Commentary on "Pediatric Idiopathic Steroid-sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome Diagnosis and Therapy - Short version of the updated German Best Practice Guideline (S2e)"

To biopsy or not to biopsy a teenager with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome? Biopsy first

Kidney biopsy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of several glomerular diseases. While it is generally considered a routine and safe procedure in children, it should be conducted with the primary objective of addressing the following question: do the prognosis and treatments vary based on the findings of kidney biopsy? In children presenting with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), guidelines suggest to consider kidney biopsy for individuals older than 12 years, primarily due to the possible increased incidence of different glomerulonephritis compared to younger patients, who predominantly manifest with minimal change disease. However, these guidelines also advocate for uniform therapeutic strategies, typically steroids, irrespective of the age or histological findings. Whether the age of more than 12 years may be a recommendation for performing kidney biopsy at presentation of INS is debatable. Instead, kidney biopsy could be reserved for steroid-resistant cases. On the other hand, when kidney biopsy is performed in INS, particularly in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, histology may reveal additional lesions, that are strongly associated with a poorer response to treatment and worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, current guidelines on treatments of nephrotic syndrome may appear overly restrictive, despite the relevant findings provided by kidney biopsy. Therefore, in the present manuscript, which is part of a pro-con debate on the management of nephrotic syndrome in adolescents, we emphasize the potential role of performing a kidney biopsy before initiating corticosteroid treatment.

Is kidney biopsy necessary in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome?

AIM

To investigate the need, in the Northern European setting, to perform kidney biopsy in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

In this retrospective study 124 individuals aged 1-18 years with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, followed in the paediatric hospitals in southern Sweden from 1999 to 2018, were included.

RESULTS

There was a median follow-up time of 6.5 (0.2-16.8) years. The majority (92%) of children were steroid-sensitive and of them, 60.5% were frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent. Microscopic haematuria was found at onset in 81.1% and hypertension in 8.7%. At least one kidney biopsy was performed in 93 (75%). The most common indication was a steroid-dependent or relapsing course (58.4%). One of 79 steroid-sensitive children had another histological diagnosis than minimal change nephropathy 1.3%, 95% confidence interval (0.002, 0.068). Bleeding occurred after eight biopsies (6.6%). Twenty individuals (30.7%) were transferred to adult units, 18 still on immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

We have in our cohort of unselected children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome confirmed that a kidney biopsy rarely gives important medical information in steroid-sensitive children without any other complicating factor and that the liberal policy of kidney biopsy in the Nordic countries safely can be changed.