Neoral induction in pediatric renal transplantation

Renal diseases and transplantation in children

The diseases that are most commonly responsible for renal damage and end-stage renal disease are unique in children. The devastating effect of chronic renal failure on the mental and physical development of children offers many challenging management problems. Although less than perfect, successful renal transplantation is considered the best available treatment option for children, with the alternative of dialysis often made difficult by access problems, growth retardation and renal osteodystrophy. Children comprise between 5 and 8% of our transplant programme, and we consider transplantation and dialysis to be complementary rather than competitive.

Cyclosporine drug monitoring with C0 and C2 concentrations in children with stable renal allograft function

Cyclosporin A (CsA) has a narrow therapeutic window and necessitates monitoring of blood concentration. We aimed to evaluate trough (C0) and second hour (C2) level after ingestion of drug monitoring in renal allograft recipients. In this retrospective study, 12 children eight boys and four girls; mean age at transplantation 14.6 +/- 3.7 yr (ranges: 7.0-19.0), mean age post-transplant 17.8 +/- 4.9 yr (ranges: 9.0-24.0) who were transplanted >6 months were enrolled in this evaluation. Ten were recipients of a living related donor and two deceased donor grafts. While six children were receiving CsA, steroids and azathioprine, the other six received CsA, steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. Clinical course, blood pressure, renal and liver function tests were recorded. Mean C0 and C2 were 96.2 +/- 59.5 and 504 +/- 305.4 ng/mL respectively. Mean serum creatinine level was 1.2 +/- 0.45 mg/dL and mean creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 89.2 +/- 36.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was a correlation between serum creatinine level, CsA dose and C2 levels,whereas,there was no correlation between age, blood pressure, CrCl and C2 levels. However, no correlation was found between C0 levels and any of the above parameters. In conclusion, our data suggest that C2 levels are correlated better with dose and serum creatinine level.

Renal transplantation: the present and the future

Children receiving kidney transplants in the modern era in developed countries have excellent overall results. Graft survival and patient survival in children is now virtually equal to that in adult organ recipients. Deceased donor source kidneys are no longer associated with significantly inferior outcomes. These advances are in large part due to development in more potent immunosuppressive agents and newer combinations. These advances have also come at a price in the form of increased post-transplant infections. The transplant community is now moving to minimization protocols to reduce the adverse effects of many of the medications and to reduce the incidence of infections. Newer techniques of diagnosis of acute rejection, degree of immunosuppression and DNA-based viral surveillance are changing the face of clinical practice. Newer technologies such as stem cell transplantation, tissue engineering and xenotransplantation promise even more changes in the future.

Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations

Immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant recipients is changing as a consequence of the increasing number of available immunosuppressive agents. Generic and other new formulations are now emerging onto the market, clinical experience is growing, and it is expected that clinicians should tailor immunosuppressive protocols to individual patients by optimising dosages and drugs according to the maturation and clinical status of the child. Most information about the clinical pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in paediatrics is centred on cyclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal and liver transplant recipients; data regarding other immunosuppressants and transplant types are limited. Although the clinical pharmacokinetics of these drugs in paediatric transplant recipients are still under investigation, it is evident that the pharmacokinetic parameters observed in adults may not be applicable to children, especially in younger age groups. In general, patients younger than 5 years old show higher clearance rates irrespective of the organ transplanted or drug used. Another important factor that frequently affects clearance in this patient population is the post-transplant time. In accordance with these findings, and in contrast with the usual under-dosage in children, the need for higher dosages in younger recipients and during the early post-transplant period seems evident. To achieve the best compromise between prevention of rejection and toxicity, dosage individualisation is required and this can be achieved through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This approach is particularly useful to ensure the cost-effective management of paediatric transplant recipients in whom the pharmacokinetic behaviour, target concentrations for clinical use and optimal dosage strategies of a particular drug may not yet be well defined. Although TDM may be a tool for improving immunosuppressive therapy, there is little information concerning its positive contribution to clinical events, including outcomes, for paediatric patients. Substantial information to support the use of TDM exists for cyclosporin and, to a lesser extent, for tacrolimus, but a diversity of options affects their implementation in the clinical setting. The role of TDM in therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus has yet to be defined regarding both methods and clinical indications. Pharmacodynamic monitoring appears more suited to other immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, corticosteroids and monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. If coupled with pharmacokinetic measurements, such monitoring would allow earlier and more precise optimisation of therapy. Very few population pharmacokinetic studies have been carried out in paediatric transplant patients. This type of study is needed so that techniques such as Bayesian forecasting can be applied to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant patients.