Die deutsche Version der Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale (BBPDS-D): Übersetzung, kulturelle Anpassung und linguistische Validierung an Patienten mit komplexem regionalem Schmerzsyndrom

Transcultural adaptation of the bath CRPS body perception disturbance scale into French

Body perception disturbances are a typical symptom among people with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). To assess it, the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale (B-BPDS) is a comprehensive tool which was validated in English and translated/validated in German and Japanese. To date, no French version was available. We translated the B-BPDS in French using the forward-backward method to obtain a French version (B-BPDS-F). Then, we examined its internal consistency, concurrent validity and structural validity. 32 participants were included for the first evaluation and 21 for the second. Internal consistency of the B-BPDS-F was adequate after removing item 3 on attention. B-BPDS-F was significantly correlated with pain at rest, quality of life total score and anxiety/depression dimensions. Exploratory Factor Analysis showed 2 main factors which explain 63 and 31% of the total variance. ICC was found acceptable. Our results are in line with previous work and provide a valid measurement tool in French.

Central sensitization in CRPS patients with widespread pain: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Widespread pain hypersensitivity and enhanced temporal summation of pain (TSP) are commonly reported in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and discussed as proxies for central sensitization. This study aimed to directly relate such signs of neuronal hyperexcitability to the pain phenotype of CRPS patients.

METHODS

Twenty-one CRPS patients and 20 healthy controls (HC) were recruited. The pain phenotype including spatial pain extent (assessed in % body surface) and intensity were assessed and related to widespread pain hypersensitivity, TSP, and psychological factors. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed in the affected, the contralateral and a remote (control) area.

RESULTS

CRPS patients showed decreased pressure pain thresholds in all tested areas (affected: t(34)  = 4.98, P < .001, contralateral: t(35) = 3.19, P = .005, control: t(31) = 2.65, P = .012). Additionally, patients showed increased TSP in the affected area (F(3,111) = 4.57, P = .009) compared to HC. TSP was even more enhanced in patients with a high compared to a low spatial pain extent (F(3,51) = 5.67, P = .008), suggesting pronounced spinal sensitization in patients with extended pain patterns. Furthermore, the spatial pain extent positively correlated with the Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale (ρ = 0.491; P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we provide evidence that the pain phenotype in CRPS, that is, spatial pain extent, might be related to sensitization mechanism within the central nociceptive system. This study points towards central neuronal excitability as a potential therapeutic target in patients with more widespread CRPS.

[Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) - State of the Art in Diagnostics and Therapy]

The complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) usually occurs within a few weeks in 2-5% of all patients after trauma or surgery or subsequent measures of the distal extremities. There are certain risk factors for its occurrence but no "CRPS personality", instead there are factors that negatively influence the course. The prognosis is generally good ("rule of thirds"), but remaining limitations are common. The diagnosis is clinically possible according to the "Budapest criteria". Additional examinations are possible in case of doubt but are neither conclusive nor exclusive. Corticoids and bisphosphonates are used alongside drugs that have an effect on neuropathic pain. Invasive therapies do not have good evidence and have therefore lost their importance. The rehabilitative therapy is carried out actively and with a lot of self-exercises at an early stage. Invasive anesthetic, passive therapies are obsolete. Special forms of treatment are "graded exposure" (GEXP) in the case of dominant anxiety and, e.g., "graded motor imagery" (GMI) in case of neglect-like symptoms. In addition to educational and behavioral therapy elements, psychotherapy for CRPS also includes participation as part of graded exposure.

Modern Principles of Diagnosis and Treatment in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a relatively common complication, occurring in 5% of cases after injury or surgery, particularly in the limbs. The incidence of CPRS is around 5-26/100 000. The latest revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11) now categorizes CRPS as a primary pain condition of multifactorial origin, rather than a disease of the skeletal system or the autonomic nervous system.

METHODS

Method: Based on a selective search of the literature, we summarize current principles for the diagnosis and treatment of CRPS.

RESULTS

Results: Regional findings in CRPS are accompanied by systemic symptoms, especially by neurocognitive disorders of body perception and of symptom processing. The therapeutic focus is shifting from predominantly passive peripheral measures to early active treatments acting both centrally and peripherally. The treatment is centered on physiotherapy and occupational therapy to improve sensory perception, strength, (fine) motor skills, and sensorimotor integration/ body perception. This is supported by stepped psychological interventions to reduce anxiety and avoidance behavior, medication to decrease inflammation and pain, passive physical measures for reduction of edema and of pain, and medical aids to improve functioning in daily life. Interventional procedures should be limited to exceptional cases and only be performed in specialized centers. Spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion stimulation, respectively, are the interventions with the best evidence.

CONCLUSION

Conclusion: The modern principles for the diagnosis and treatment of CRPS consider both, physiological and psychological mechanisms, with the primary goal of restoring function and participation. More research is needed to strengthen the evidence base in this field.

Validation of the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale

The Bath Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Body Perception Disturbance Scale ("B-CRPS-BPDS") measures alterations in body perception. We assessed its internal consistency, known group validity, construct validity, and associations with demographic and clinical characteristics. We also evaluated changes in, and baseline predictors of B-CRPS-BPDS scores at follow-up. We included people with CRPS (N = 114) and pain-free controls (N = 69). People with CRPS obtained higher scores than pain-free controls on all B-CRPS-BPDS items, except the item on attention. Because this item also had an insufficient corrected item-total correlation, we propose a revised B-CRPS-BPDS (r-B-CRPS-BPDS) excluding this item. The internal consistency of the r-B-CRPS-BPDS was good. The r-B-CRPS-BPDS showed a large positive relationship with "motor neglect-like symptoms", indicating good construct validity. The r-B-CRPS-BPDS showed positive relationships with pain intensity, fear of movement, depression, and upper limb disability. There were no independent relationships with handedness, affected side, affected limb, disease duration, CRPS severity score, tension, anger, fatigue, confusion, and vigour. Finally, r-B-CRPS-BPDS scores did not consistently change over time. Our results demonstrate the utility of the r-B-CRPS-BPDS for measuring body perception disturbances in CRPS. PERSPECTIVE: This article evaluates the validity of the Bath Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Body Perception Disturbance Scale ("B-CRPS-BPDS") in CRPS, and assesses relationships with demographic and clinical variables. The proposed revised B-CRPS-BPDS appears to be a valid measure of body perception disturbances in CRPS.

Validation of the Japanese version of the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale for CRPS

PURPOSE

Body perception disturbance is a common symptom and may be one of the key targets of treatment intervention in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). As a comprehensive assessment tool of body perception in patients with CRPS, the Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale (BPDS) was developed, and its adequate reliability and validity have been reported. However, there is no available Japanese version. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a Japanese version of BPDS (BPDS-J) and to investigate the validity of this scale in Japanese patients with CRPS.

METHODS

We developed BPDS-J using a forward-backward method. We then assessed 22 patients with CRPS type 1 of the upper limb using BPDS-J, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and a two-point discrimination threshold (TPD) on the middle finger. We investigated the internal consistency of BPDS-J and the correlation between BPDS-J and clinical outcomes as a concurrent validity measure.

RESULTS

BPDS-J had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.73) and was significantly correlated with the TPD ratio (r = 0.65, adjusted p = 0.01) and TSK (r = 0.51, adjusted p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

BPDS-J has good internal consistency and concurrent validity for assessing body perception disturbance in Japanese patients with CRPS. Disturbed body perception may be worth evaluating when managing patients with CRPS using BPDS.