[Prediction and prevention of chronic postoperative pain]

[Structure and process evaluation of complex interventions in pain therapy : Description of a methodological approach using the example of POET-Pain]

To evaluate the quality of care, particularly in the case of new forms of healthcare interventions, the healthcare services to be provided are defined and documented in advance. The presented explanatory sequential mixed methods design combines quantitative and qualitative data collection and the analysis enables a deeper understanding of a new healthcare intervention. Using the example of the POET-Pain project, which investigates the effect of a perioperative transitional pain service (TPS), the methodological application of the explanatory sequential mixed methods design is demonstrated in order to present the structural and process evaluation of the new healthcare intervention (in this case TPS) and to understand its influence on the quality of care. The mixed methods design presented enables the results of the quantitative phase to be interpreted and expanded in depth using qualitative data, which leads to a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter (second pillar of health services research).

[The guidelines of the Federal Joint Committee on acute pain management : Background and consequences for the practice in hospitals]

The quality of postoperative pain therapy in Germany shows a heterogeneous treatment practice and large differences in quality between individual institutions, The patient representatives in the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) have therefore decisively campaigned for many years that instruments of non-legislative standards are employed in order to noticeably improve the quality of perioperative pain therapy for patients in Germany. As a result of these efforts, in October 2020 a binding specification for internal quality management was included in the quality management guidelines (QM-RL) by the G‑BA. This describes in concrete terms the structural and procedural requirements for an internal quality management of acute pain for all institutions in which operations and comparable potentially painful interventions are carried out. This article describes the content of this regulation and the resulting consequences for the institutions, the medical and administrative management and especially the role of anesthesia.

[Diagnostics and therapy of neuropathic pain]

Neuropathic pain is pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Scientific studies have shown that neuropathic pain is the result of complex altered signalling processes in the peripheral and central nervous system. Current forms of treatment of neuropathic pain are causally oriented but also aim at symptomatic analgesia by pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods. Furthermore, psychological pain management techniques are used in a supportive role. This review summarizes the contemporary diagnostics of neuropathic pain using frequent diseases as examples and presents the evidence from randomized controlled trials on the treatment of neuropathic pain. Treatment guidelines for pharmacological management of neuropathic pain include evidence-based use of antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids, capsaicin and lidocaine.

[Procedure Specific Pain Therapy - the PROSPECT Idea]

Acute pain therapy following operative or interventional procedures has become a compulsory component of a modern perioperative patient management. A structured pain regimen has several clear advantages: it leads to an improvement of the patients' quality of life in the short term, it reduces perioperative morbidity in the medium term, it reduces pain chronification in the long term, at the same time improving the economic efficiency due to an accelerated mobilization, a reduction of the hospitalization and an avoidance of complication inherent costs.This article provides detailed information on the change of paradigm, away from a generalized and rather unspecific acute pain therapy towards a problem oriented procedure specific regimen. It points out two examples of the PROSPECT (PROcedure SPECific pain managemenT) methodology and explains its background.

[Psychosocial factors in the prevention of pain]

The question of pain prevention is becoming increasingly important, both in society and in science. According to the International Society for the Study of Pain, general areas for which pain prevention measures can be recommended have been defined. These approaches are mostly limited to unspecific recommendations with the aim of improving general health behaviour. Common to all of them is that they essentially address psychosocial and psychobehavioral aspects. In contrast to genetic factors or other non-modifiable environmental factors, psychosocial and psychobehavioral aspects are potentially modifiable variables, making them possible starting points for prevention programs. Furthermore, recent studies provide important knowledge about psychological and social risk factors of pain chronification and thus offer new approaches for future pain prevention strategies. At the same time, the efficacy and successful implementation of such programs is so complex that valid statements on effectiveness and benefit can only be made through care-related evaluation. This review addresses psychological and social factors in the prevention of pain. A selective literature search was carried out to this end. Based on selected studies, psychological and social predictors of pain development are presented and their potential for future pain prevention programs discussed. The article concludes with a discussion of possible implications.