Computed tomography findings in diseases of the adrenal gland

Impact of different peak tube voltage settings on adrenal adenomas attenuation at unenhanced CT

OBJECTIVES

To assess the influence of peak tube voltage peak setting on adrenal adenomas (AA) attenuation on unenhanced abdominal CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IRB-approved retrospective observational cohort study. We included 89 patients with imaging-defined AAs with shortest diameter > 6 mm who underwent two or more unenhanced abdominal CTs using at least two different peak tube voltage settings. Two readers independently measured adenoma attenuation on different CT acquisitions by drawing a round ROI on 3 mm thick axial MPR reconstructions encompassing at least 2/3 of the lesion's surface. The mean of the values measured by the two readers was used for further analysis. Interobserver variability was assessed (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient). Attenuation values measured on 100, 110 and 140 kVp acquisitions were compared with standard 120 kVp ones (Bland-Altman analysis).

RESULTS

We included 275 unenhanced abdominal CTs (3.1 ± 0.9/patient) in image analysis; 131 acquired at 120 kVp, 65 at 100 kVp, 59 at 110 kVp, and 20 at 140 kVp. 107 lesions were detected in 89 patients (1-4/patient), with a mean maximum diameter of 17 ± 6 mm. Interobserver agreement in attenuation measurement was excellent (ICC: 0.95, CI (92-97)). Median adenoma attenuation was significantly lower on 100 kVp images than on 120 kVp ones (-1 HU, IQR (-5 to 3.6), vs, 2.5 HU, IQR (-1.5 to 8.5); p < 0.001) whereas we didn't find statistically significant differences in adenoma attenuation between 110 kVp or 140 kVp and 120 kVp ones.

CONCLUSION

AA attenuation is significantly lower on unenhanced CT scans acquired at 100 kVp than on those acquired at "standard" 120 kVp.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

AA attenuation is significantly lower at 100 kVp in comparison to 120 kVp. This might be exploited to increase unenhanced CT sensitivity in adenoma characterisation, but further studies including non-adenoma lesions are mandatory to confirm this hypothesis.

KEY POINTS

CT scans are often acquired using peak tube voltage settings different from the "standard" 120 kVp. AA attenuation varies if CT scans are acquired using different tube peak voltage settings. At 100 kVp AAs show a significantly lower attenuation than at 120 kVp.

Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the accuracy of density characteristics and washout values of lesions detected on computed tomography (CT) at the cutoff values obtained from the literature by taking the pathological results of adrenalectomy specimens as reference and to determine the cutoff values of parameters evaluated on CT for the differentiation of adenoma and nonadenoma lesions in the study group.

METHODS

Hospital records and standard CT imaging data (noncontrast early phase [65 s] and late phase [15 min] ) of 84 patients with 87 lesions who underwent adrenalectomy between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospectively reevaluated by two radiologists in consensus. The patients were categorized as having adenoma and nonadenoma lesions according to the pathology results. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of CT parameters (density values and washout percentages) were evaluated. Differences in the CT parameters (size, noncontrast and early-late enhancement density and absolute and relative washout values) were investigated. The optimal cutoff values of CT parameters were determined by ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Noncontrast CT had a specificity of 87.75% and 95.9%, sensitivity of 60% and 48.6%, diagnostic accuracy of 77.7% and 89.47% for adenomas, at the cutoff values of ≤10 HU and ≤0 HU, respectively. For absolute washout value ≥ 60%, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 64.7%, 52.38% and 56.75%, respectively; while these rates were 76.47%, 56.52% and 62.16%, respectively, for relative washout value ≥40%. Adenomas and nonadenomas showed significant difference in terms of size (p < 0.0001), unenhanced attenuation (p < 0.0001), relative washout (p = 0.020) and delay enhancement (p < 0.001). But there were no differences in terms of absolute washout (p = 0.230) and early enhancement (p = 0.264). The cutoff values for the differentiation of adenomas and nonadenomas were as follows: size ≤44 mm, noncontrast density <20 HU, early-phase density ≥45 HU, delayed-phase density ≤44 HU, absolute washout 74.83% and relative washout 57.76%.

CONCLUSION

The current washout criteria used in the differentiation of adenoma and nonadenoma lesions in dynamic CT imaging can give false negative and positive results. According to the existing criteria, the most reliable parameter in adenoma-nonadenoma differentiation is ≤ 0 HU noncontrast CT density value.

Pitfalls and differential diagnosis on adrenal lesions: current concepts in CT/MR imaging: a narrative review

The purpose of this pictorial essay is to review the imaging findings of adrenal lesions. Adrenal lesions could be divided into functioning or non-functioning masses, primary or metastatic, and benign or malignant. Imaging techniques have undergone significant advances in recent years. The most significant objective of adrenal imaging is represented by the detection and, when possible, characterization of adrenal lesions in order to direct patient management correctly. The detection and management of adrenal lesions is based on cross-sectional imaging obtained with non-contrast CT (tumour density), contrast-enhanced CT including delayed washout (either absolute percentage washout or relative percentage one) and finally with MR chemical shift analysis (loss of signal intensity between in-phase and out-of-phase images including both qualitative and quantitative estimates of signal loss). The small incidental adrenal nodules are benign, in most of cases; some tumors such as lipid-rich adenoma and myelolipoma have characteristic features that can be diagnosed accurately in CT. On contrary, if the presenting contrast-enhanced CT shows an adrenal mass with uncertain or malignant morphologic features, particularly in patients with a known history of malignancy, further evaluations should be considered. The most significative implications for radiologists are represented by how to assess risk of malignancy on imaging and what follow-up to indicate if an adrenal incidentaloma is not surgically removed.

Likelihood ratio of computed tomography characteristics for diagnosis of malignancy in adrenal incidentaloma: systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To propose an evidence based diagnostic algorithm using mass characteristics to determine malignancy in patients with adrenal incidentaloma by CTscan.

Methods

A systematic review in Medline, Scopus, relevant reference books and desk searching was performed up to January 2016 with relevant reference checking. The summery estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio of different characteristics were calculated in two groups of the articles investigating the cases without previous malignancy and the articles investigating the oncologic cases.

Results

Thirty six articles were included in this study. In the first group with no history of malignancy a positive and negative LR of 3.1 and 0.13 in 4 cm threshold and positive and negative LR of 2.85 and 0 in 10HU density were found. In the second group with history of malignancy positive and negative LR of 2.3 and 0.27 in 3 cm threshold and positive and negative LR of 3.6 and 0.08 in 20HU density were resulted.

Conclusion

The results retrieved in this study considering the limitations show that adrenal incidentaloma with a size less than 4 cm or a mass larger than 4 cm with density less than 10HU in the first group can be managed with imaging follow up. For masses larger than 4 cm with density more than 10HU another diagnostic procedure should be performed. In the second group an adrenal mass larger than 3 cm or less than 3 cm with density more than 20HU should go under operation. But masses smaller than 3 cm with less than 20HU density can be followed by imaging.