Is it possible to use transaminases for deciding on surgical or non-operative treatment for blunt liver trauma?

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on liver injury following hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

The protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) against liver ischemia-reperfusion injury caused by hepatectomy remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RIPC strategies. PubMed, SinoMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness and safety of RIPC strategies. The primary outcomes were operation time, index of liver function on postoperative day (POD) 1, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. The pooled odds ratios and weighted mean differences at 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. A total of 459 patients were included in seven RCTs. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alanine aminotransferase (AST) values on POD1 were significantly different between the RIPC group and the N-RIPC group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.02, respectively). However, the heterogeneity was significant (I² = 84% and I² = 86%), and the results of a sensitivity analysis were unstable. There was no significant difference in the total bilirubin levels (P = 0.25) between the two groups on POD1. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the AST and ALT levels on POD1 between the RIIPC group and the N-RIPC group, regardless of whether the vascular control technique was used (all P > 0.05). Based on current evidence, RIPC does not alleviate liver injury caused by IRI after hepatectomy.

Combination of liver enzymes, amylase and abdominal ultrasound tests have acceptable diagnostic values as an alternative test for abdominopelvic CT scan in blunt abdominal trauma

Introduction

Abdominal trauma accounts for 15–20% of all-cause mortality of trauma. Abdominopelvic CT scan with intravenous contrast is considered the most accurate non-invasive diagnostic tool in detecting intra-abdominal injuries. In previous studies, rise in liver enzymes and amylase was associated with intra-abdominal injuries but the studies were not sufficient. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic values of liver enzymes and amylase for intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma patients.

Methods

We included blunt abdominal trauma patients who referred to three teaching hospitals in 2018. The patients who had 14 years old or more and Glasgow Coma Scale above 8 were enrolled the study if the treating physician had high index of suspicion for intra-abdominal injuries and sent the patients for abdominopelvic CT scan with intravenous contrast. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values are calculated for results of liver enzymes, amylase and abdominal ultrasound.

Results

Eventually, 300 patients with blunt abdominal trauma entered the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of concurrent positive results of abdominal ultrasound, amylase and liver enzymes were 81.73 (95% CI, 73.2–88.1), 63.78 (95% CI, 65.36–70.61), 58.38 (95% CI, 56.36–70.61) and 84.89 (95% CI, 77.6–90.19), respectively.

Conclusion

Considering findings of the present study, the combination of liver enzymes, amylase and abdominal ultrasound results can be an alternative method for detecting intra-abdominal injuries in patients in whom treating physicians have limitations such as overweight, instability of hemodynamic and lack of CT scan facility.

Management of Liver Trauma

In the last 30 years, the management of liver injury has evolved significantly. The advancement of imaging studies has played an important role in the conservative approach for management. A shift from operative to nonoperative management for most hemodynamically stable patients with hepatic injury has been prompted by speed and sensitivity of diagnostic imaging and by advances in critical care monitoring. In this review article, the up-to-date recommendation on the management approach of liver trauma will be discussed.