Direct cardiovascular complications and indirect collateral damage during the COVID-19 pandemic : A review

Low Prevalence of Late Myocardial Injury on Cardiac MRI Following COVID-19 Infection

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings indicative of myocardial injury in patients who recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently unclear, with a high variability in the reported prevalence.

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence of myocardial injury after a COVID-19 infection.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective, bicentric study.

SUBJECTS

Seventy consecutive patients who recovered from COVID-19 and were previously hospitalized. Mean age was 57 years and 39% of the patients were female. Ten healthy controls and a comparator group of 75 nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients were employed.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5-T, steady-state free precession (SSFP) gradient-echo sequence, modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence with balanced SSFP readout, T2-prepared spiral readout sequence and a T1-weighted inversion recovery fast gradient-echo sequence was acquired ~4-5 months after recovery from COVID-19.

ASSESSMENT

The SSFP sequence was utilized for the calculation of left and right ventricular volumes and ejection fractions (LVEF and RVEF) following manual endocardial contouring. T1 and T2 mapping was performed by pixel-wise exponential fitting, and T1 and T2 values were computed by manual contouring of the left ventricular endocardial and epicardial walls. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images were graded qualitatively as LGE present or absent.

STATISTICAL TESTS

T-tests and the χ2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively between the COVID-19 and NICM groups. Inter-rater agreement was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient for continuous variables and Cohen's kappa test for LGE.

RESULTS

Reduced RVEF occurred in 10%, LGE and elevated native T1 in 9%, reduced LVEF in 4%, and elevated T2 in 3% of COVID-19 patients, respectively. Patients with NICM had lower mean LVEF (41.6% ± 6% vs. 60% ± 7%), RVEF (46% ± 5% vs. 61% ± 9%), and a significantly higher prevalence of LGE (27% vs. 9%) when compared to those post-COVID-19.

DATA CONCLUSION

Abnormal cardiac MRI findings may show a low prevalence in patients who recovered from COVID-19 and were previously hospitalized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Acute myocardial infarction during late COVID-19 era: patient characteristics, presentation and outcomes

COVID-19 pandemic has unquestionably influenced care of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Still, its impact on patients (pts) characteristics, presentation, treatment, and outcomes remains not well established in late pandemic times. To address this issue, we performed a prospective study of type-1 AMI patients admitted in a tertiary care hospital. Pts were enrolled during 6-months in 2019 [n=122; pre-COVID-19 (PC) group] and in 2021 [n=196; late-COVID-19 (C) group]. Data was based on pts interview and review of medical records. Age and gender distribution, as well as ST/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI) proportion and access to coronariography and revascularization were similar between groups. Group C patients presented more pre-existing established cardiovascular disease (CVD) (43% vs 30%; p=0.03); more frequent description of typical chest pain (94% vs 84%; p=0,002); higher levels of pain intensity, in a 0-10 scale (8±2 vs 7±2; p=0.02); higher frequencies of AMI complications (27% vs 15%; p=0.01) and worse Killip (K) class evolution (K≥2 in 22% C vs13% PC patients; p=0.05). In conclusion, late pandemic AMI patients presented worse in-hospital outcomes in our study, though pre-hospital and hospital care were comparable to pre-pandemic times. COVID patients had a higher burden of pre-existing established CVD and a more typical and intense symptom presentation. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that "sicker" patients continued to look for help when presenting AMI symptoms, while "less sick" patients and the ones with less typical and intense symptoms possibly avoided contact with health care services during late pandemic period.

Cardiovascular disease and COVID-19, a deadly combination: A review about direct and indirect impact of a pandemic

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to present with respiratory symptoms, which can lead to severe pneumonia and respiratory failure. However, it can have multisystem complications such as cardiovascular manifestations. The cardiovascular manifestations reported comprise myocarditis, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, deep vein embolism, acute heart failure, and myocardial infarction. There is also an indirect impact of the pandemic on the management of cardiovascular care that has been shown clearly in multiple publications. In this review, we summarize the deadly relation of COVID-19 with cardiovascular events and the wider impact on several cardiovascular care areas by the pandemic situation

Risk of Cardiovascular Events After COVID-19

We aimed to determine absolute and relative risks of either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection for late cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality. We conducted a retrospective double cohort study of patients with either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19+ cohort) and its documented absence (COVID-19- cohort). The study investigators drew a simple random sample of records from all patients under the Oregon Health & Science University Healthcare (n = 65,585), with available COVID-19 test results, performed March 1, 2020 to September 13, 2020. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years and no established Oregon Health & Science University care. The primary outcome was a composite of CV morbidity and mortality. All-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. The study population included 1,355 patients (mean age 48.7 ± 20.5 years; 770 women [57%], 977 White non-Hispanic [72%]; 1,072 ensured [79%]; 563 with CV disease history [42%]). During a median 6 months at risk, the primary composite outcome was observed in 38 of 319 patients who were COVID-19+ (12%) and 65 of 1,036 patients who were COVID-19- (6%). In the Cox regression, adjusted for demographics, health insurance, and reason for COVID-19 testing, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with the risk for primary composite outcome (hazard ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.78, p = 0.029). Inverse probability-weighted estimation, conditioned for 31 covariates, showed that for every patient who was COVID-19+, the average time to all-cause death was 65.5 days less than when all these patients were COVID-19-: average treatment effect on the treated -65.5 (95% confidence interval -125.4 to -5.61) days, p = 0.032. In conclusion, either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk for late CV outcomes and has a causal effect on all-cause mortality in a late post-COVID-19 period.