Factors influencing quality of life in patients with benign primary brain tumors: prior to and following surgery

An Overview of Reviews on Predictors of Neurorehabilitation in Surgical or Non-Surgical Patients with Brain Tumours

(1) Background. People suffering from brain cancer, regardless of histological tumour characteristics, often experience motor disturbances, cognitive-behavioural difficulty, language impairments, and functional and social limitations. The current treatment approach entails surgery and adjuvant therapy such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy combined with intensive rehabilitation. The primary focus of rehabilitation is usually motor and functional recovery, without specifically addressing the patient's quality of life. The present systematic review identifies and evaluates the predictors of functional and cognitive rehabilitation outcomes and their influence on quality of life in adult patients with brain cancer. (2) Methods. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Elsevier, Cochrane) were searched for reviews about functional, cognitive, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with central nervous system tumours, including articles published between January 2018 and May 2024. (3) Results. The search retrieved 399 records, 40 of which were reviewed. Five main areas of predictive factors were identified: diagnosis, therapy, complications, outcomes (in the motor, cognitive, and quality-of-life categories), and tailored rehabilitation. (4) Conclusions. These indicators may inform integrated care pathways for patients with primary central nervous system tumours.

Reliability and validity of the telephone-based version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale for assessing depression in individuals with primary brain tumour

This study aimed to examine interrater reliability and construct validity of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) semi-structured interview for assessing depression in adults with a primary brain tumour.

Fifty adults with a primary brain tumour (mean age = 45.86, SD = 12.48) reporting at least mild distress (Distress Thermometer [DT] ≥ 4) were recruited from a multidisciplinary brain tumour clinic and administered a telephone-based cognitive screener, MADRS, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) depression subscale and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Audiotaped interviews were transcribed and then scored by two independent raters.

Interrater reliability for the MADRS total score was excellent (ICC = 0.98) and ranged from good to excellent (ICC = 0.83-0.96) for MADRS items. The MADRS total score was significantly associated with the DT, DASS depression, and GAD-7 (r = 0.50-0.76, p < 0.001), thus providing evidence of construct validity. Individuals with poorer cognitive function reported higher levels of depression.

The findings provide psychometric support for the MADRS as a semi-structured interview for assessing depression after brain tumour. Further research investigating the sensitivity and specificity of the MADRS is recommended.

Quality of Life after Surgical Treatment of Brain Tumors

Quality of life is one of the parameters that characterize the success of brain tumor treatments, along with overall survival and a disease-free life. Thus, the main aim of this research was to evaluate the quality of life after the surgical treatment of brain tumors. The research material included 236 patients who were to undergo surgery for brain tumors. The participants completed the quality of life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and EORTC QLQ-BN20 on the day of admission to the department, on the fifth day after the removal of the brain tumor, and thirty days after the surgical procedure. Descriptive statistics, Student's t-test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, the Shapiro-Wolf test, ANOVA, and Fisher's least significant difference post hoc test were performed. The mean score of the questionnaire before the surgical procedure amounted to 0.706, 5 days after surgery it amounted to 0.614, and 30 days after surgery to 0.707. The greatest reduction in the quality of life immediately after the procedure was observed in patients with low-grade glial tumors (WHO I, II) and extracerebral tumors (meningiomas and neuromas). Thirty days after surgery, an improvement in the quality of life was observed in all included groups. The greatest improvement was recorded in the group of patients operated on for meningioma and neuroblastoma, and the lowest in patients treated for metastatic tumors. Contemporary surgical procedures used in neurosurgery reduce the quality of life in patients with brain tumors only in the early postoperative period. Histopathological diagnoses of these tumors impact the quality of life of patients.

Preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery

PURPOSE

To identify the preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated before brain tumor surgery and after 3 months. The cognitive evaluation included MOCA for the general cognitive status, TMT for attention and executive functions, ROWL-IR and ROWL-DR for memory, and the F-A-S for verbal fluency. Anxiety, depression, social support, resilience, personality, disability, and quality of life were evaluated with the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): HADS, OSS-3, RS-14, TIPI, WHODAS-12, and EORTC-QLQ C30. Functional status was measured with KPS. Regression analyses were performed to identify preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment; PROMs and cognitive tests were compared with the normative values.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were enrolled (64 glioma; 85 meningioma). Increasing age, lower education, higher disability, and lower ROWL-DR scores were predictors of functional impairment in glioma patients while higher TMT scores and disability were predictors in meningioma patients. In multiple regression, only a worse performance in TMT remains a predictor in meningioma patients. Cognitive tests were not significantly worse than normative values, while psychosocial functioning was impaired.

CONCLUSION

TMT could be used in the preoperative evaluation and as a potential predictor in the research field on outcome predictors. Psychosocial functioning should be studied further and considered in a clinical context to identify who need major support and to plan tailored interventions.

Type-D personality and quality of life in patients with primary brain tumours

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of type-D personality on quality of life (QoL) in patients with primary brain tumours.

METHODS

We performed descriptive cross-sectional study between July 2018 and March 2019. A convenience sample of 293 patients was recruited from an outpatient neurosurgery clinic.

RESULTS

Type-D personality was identified in 34.1% of subjects. Type-D patients had poorer QoL and experienced more severe symptoms and interference with life. Poor QoL was associated with lower education, no spouse and lower family income. Symptoms were the most significant factor affecting QoL, followed by type-D personality, income and education.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms, type-D personality and demographic factors should be considered when assessing QoL in patients with primary brain tumours. Interventions that reflect these characteristics, including type-D personality, may help improve QoL for patients with primary brain tumours.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Brain Tumor Patients Treated with Surgery: Preliminary Result of a Single Institution

Background

Alongside the extent of removal and patients’ survival in the management of brain tumors, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has become an important consideration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change of HRQOL in brain tumor patients before and after surgery and to assess the associated factors that contribute to the change of HRQOL.

Methods

A total of 258 patients who underwent surgical treatment were enrolled in this study. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the 20-item EORTC QLQ-Brain Neoplasm (QLQ-BN20) were used to assess HRQOL. Patients were asked to fill out the questionnaires before and 3-6 months after surgery.

Results

Global QOL (p<0.001) and emotional function (p<0.018) were significantly improved after surgery. Physical function (p=0.015) was significantly aggravated. Among the symptoms, headache, pain and nausea and vomiting were significantly decreased (p<0.01, p=0.041, p<0.001, respectively), while dyspnea, communication deficit and weakness of the legs were increased (p=0.005, p=0.040, and p=0.014, respectively). Preoperative neurologic deficit (p=0.019) and tumor diameter (p=0.016) were significantly related to the patients who showed aggravation of global QOL after brain tumor surgery. In the aggravated global QOL group, common complaints and concerns included role function, appetite loss, financial difficulty and future uncertainty.

Conclusion

In brain tumor patients, HRQOL has improved after surgery. Role function, appetite loss, financial difficulty and future uncertainty were important factors for HRQOL in brain tumor patients treated with surgery. Although there is National Health Insurance and Medical Aid program in Korea, financial difficulty and future uncertainty are much more important in influencing QOL than previously thought. The results of this short-term follow up preliminary study suggest that several factors were related to HRQOL, Further research is needed to evaluate the long term change of HRQOL and enhance the global QOL by analyze related factors.

Suicidal ideation, depression, and health-related quality of life in patients with benign and malignant brain tumors: a prospective observational study in 83 patients

OBJECTIVE

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychosocial burden are of relevance in patients with intracranial tumors. We investigated the prevalence of suicidal ideation (SI), depression, and their association with HRQoL in patients with intra- (IA) and extraaxial (EA) tumors during the first 9 months after diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients were recruited immediately following surgery, and re-evaluated after 3, 6, and 9 months (EORTC QLQ-C30/BN20, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Appendix). Patients with a personal history of psychological comorbidity were excluded. Sociodemographic and clinical data were evaluated.

RESULTS

IA patients had lower functioning scores and experienced more symptoms. Global Health Status was significantly lower at baseline (p = 0.038), but improved over time (p < 0.001). Seventeen patients (21.5 %) admitted to having had SI at least once during the study period (IA: n = 10/EA: n = 7). The highest rates were observed after 6 (IA: 18.8 %) and 9 months (EA: 10.0 %). Patients reporting SI had significantly higher BDI scores [p = 0.22 (baseline), p = 0.031 (3 months), p < 0.001 (6 months)]. After 6 months, HRQoL differed greatest between patients with and without SI. Most patients experienced good familial support (76 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intracranial tumors suffer from decreased HRQoL and SI regardless of histopathology. SI is associated with higher BDI scores, but not evident depression (BDI ≥ 18). Thus, patients should be screened specifically and regularly. Lower HRQoL and greatest prevalence of SI at 6 months may help clinicians to find the right time for careful monitoring of patients at risk.

Quality of life, disability, well-being, and coping strategies in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures: preoperative results in an Italian sample

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to present the preliminary results of QoL, well-being, disability, and coping strategies of patients before neurosurgical procedure.

METHODS

We analysed data on preoperative quality of life (EUROHIS-QoL), disability (WHODAS-II), well-being (PGWB-S), coping strategies (Brief COPE), and functional status (KPS score) of a sample of patients with brain tumours and cerebrovascular and spinal degenerative disease admitted to Neurological Institute Carlo Besta. Statistical analysis was performed to illustrate the distribution of sociodemographic and clinical data, to compare mean test scores to the respective normative samples, and to investigate the differences between diagnoses, the correlation between tests, and the predictive power of sociodemographic and clinical variables of QoL.

RESULTS

198 patients were included in the study. PGWB-S and EUROHIS-QoL scores were significantly lower than normative population. Patients with spinal diseases reported higher scores in WHODAS-II compared with oncological and cerebrovascular groups. Finally sociodemographic and clinical variables were significant predictors of EUROHIS-QoL, in particular PGWB-S and WHODAS-II.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results show that preoperatory period is critical and the evaluation of coping strategies, quality of life, disability, and well-being is useful to plan tailored intervention and for a better management of each patient.

Symptom distress and quality of life after stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with pituitary tumors: a questionnaire survey

Background

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment for recurrent or residual pituitary adenomas. The persistence of symptoms and treatment related complications may impair the patient’s quality of life (QOL).

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine symptom distress, QOL, and the relationship between them among patients with pituitary tumors who had undergone SRS.

Methods

This study used a cross-sectional design and purposive sampling. We enrolled patients diagnosed with pituitary tumors who had undergone SRS. Data were collected at the CyberKnife Center at a medical center in Northern Taiwan in 2012. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection. Our questionnaire consisted of 3 parts the Pituitary Tumor Symptom Distress Questionnaire, the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Short-Form (WHOQOL-BREF), and a demographic questionnaire.

Results

Sixty patients were enrolled in the study. The most common symptoms reported by patients after SRS were memory loss, fatigue, blurred vision, headache, sleep problems, and altered libido. The highest and lowest scores for QOL were in the environmental and psychological domains, respectively. Age was positively correlated with general health and the psychological domains. Level of symptom distress was negatively correlated with overall QOL, general health, physical health, and the psychological and social relationships domains. The scores in the psychological and environmental domains were higher in males than in females. Patients with ≤6 symptoms had better overall QOL, general health, physical health, and psychological and social relationships than those with >6 symptoms.

Conclusion

Symptom distress can affect different aspects of patient QOL. Levels of symptom distress, number of symptoms, age, and gender were variables significantly correlated with patient QOL. These results may be utilized by healthcare personnel to design educational and targeted interventional programs for symptom management to improve patient QOL.

Effects of surgical resection on the evolution of quality of life in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma: a report on 19 patients surviving to follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Although aggressive tumor resection favors survival in neuro-oncology, its effects on quality of life (QOL) are largely unspecified. The objective of the present study, therefore, was to study the relationship between tumor resection and QOL.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal study among 35 patients presenting with a suspected, and later confirmed, glioblastoma multiforme tumor. Following surgery, all patients received radiation therapy with concomitant temozolomide. Tumor volumes were segmented manually, and extent of resection was calculated by comparing pre- and post-operative volumes. QOL was obtained at intake and 3 months later, using the Sherbrooke Neuro-Oncology Assessment Scale. Change in QOL was determined by computing the difference between intake and follow-up data. Confounds were controlled for by detrending change in QOL scores from the effects of age, initial tumor volume, tumor location, and baseline QOL.

RESULTS

Results showed that larger tumors at intake provoke increased pain (mostly headaches; r = 0.41, p = 0.015) and decreased social support/acceptance of disease (r = 0.43, p = 0.009). Results also showed that compared to biopsies, craniotomies were associated with preserved well-being across nearly all domains of QOL. When extent of resection was analyzed more specifically, results confirmed that larger resections prevented the decay in functional well-being (r = 0.616, p = 0.005) and neurocognitive function (r = 0.51, p = 0.026) typically observed as time progresses. Larger resections were also independently associated with prolonged survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the data were obtained from a relatively small sample of patients, results indicate that aggressive resections avert decay in QOL, and thus prolong optimized survival.

Factors influencing quality of life in adult patients with primary brain tumors

We performed a literature review with respect to factors influencing health-related quality of life (QOL) in adults with primary brain tumors. A comprehensive, peer-reviewed literature search was performed including studies examining QOL in adults with high-grade gliomas and low-grade gliomas and in routine neuro-oncology practice. The interpretation and implication of QOL domain scores may be different in high-grade, low-grade, and benign brain tumors. Several patient-related, treatment-related, and sociocultural factors influence QOL scores. Pretreatment baseline QOL domain scores have been shown to be a predictive parameter for survival function. Implementation of QOL scores in routine clinical practice is underused. QOL is an important outcome measure in the treatment of patients with brain tumors and should be incorporated as a surrogate end point along with traditional end points, such as disease-free and overall survival in most current trials.

Sporadic intracranial haemangioblastomas: surgical outcome in a single institution series

BACKGROUND

Haemangioblastomas are benign vascular tumours that may appear sporadically or in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Despite their higher incidence, sporadic haemangioblastomas have been less studied than syndromic ones. In this article, we evaluate the specific features, outcome and quality of life of patients with intracranial sporadic haemangioblastomas (ISHs) operated on in our institution.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2010, 38 patients harbouring 38 ISHs were operated on in our department. Their clinical, biological, radiological and surgical features were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were contacted for a quality-of-life (QOL) survey assessed by the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF36). The mean duration of follow-up was 40 months (13-108 months).

RESULTS

ISH represented 0.9 % of primary intracranial neoplasms treated in our centre during this period. Patients comprised 23 men and 15 women with a mean age of 47 years. None had polycythaemia. Cerebellar locations accounted for 79 % of ISHs, and brainstem ISH with involvement of the floor of the fourth ventricle represented 11 % of ISHs. At last follow-up, two patients harbouring solid medulla oblongata haemangioblastoma had died following severe bulbar syndrome and five patients had died of unrelated causes. One patient had multiple surgeries for three recurrences. Tumoral control was achieved in all cases at last follow-up. Results of the SF-36 questionnaire were as follows: median physical functioning score 100 (range 0-100), median physical problems score 100 (range 0-100), median bodily pain score 100 (range 45-100), median social functioning score 100 (range 25-100), median general mental health score 84 (range 40-92), median emotional problems score 100 (range 0-100), median vitality score 70 (range 35-80) and median general health perceptions score 70 (range 35-100). Mean QOL scores were similar to the general healthy population.

CONCLUSION

Surgery of ISH provides good QOL and tumoral control except for those located in the medulla oblongata. We recommend considering a careful multimodal therapeutic approach, including radiosurgery for these specific locations.

Development of anxiety and depression in patients with benign intracranial meningiomas: a prospective long-term study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to provide the first prospective longitudinal assessment of anxiety and depression in patients with a benign intracranial meningioma (WHO° I).

METHODS

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was applied prior to (t1) and directly after (t2) neurosurgery as well as 6 months after surgery (t3). The research was conducted in a single treatment centre in Germany. Numerous sociodemographic, medical, psychological and cognitive accompanying measures were assessed. The study population consisted of 52 meningioma patients. Additionally, a control group of 24 patients with malignant brain tumours (astrocytoma WHO° III) was assessed.

RESULTS

In meningioma patients, anxiety was high prior to surgery but declined significantly after successful neurosurgical treatment. Low levels of depression were observed at all times. In contrast, astrocytoma patients showed constantly high levels of anxiety whilst depression increased over the course of the disease. Numerous medical, psychosocial and psychological factors were associated with psychiatric morbidity in meningioma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, psychiatric morbidity of patients with benign intracranial meningiomas was comparable to that of the general population after successful neurosurgical treatment. Numerous associated factors suggest complex relationships within a biopsychosocial model. However, due to the small sample size and recruitment in a single institution, our results are of limited generalisability and need cross-validation in future studies.