Virtual navigation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: an exploration of patients’ views

Perspectives of healthcare professionals on patient Internet use during the cancer experience

In this study, we document cancer healthcare professionals' views of patients' use of cancer-related Internet information (CRII) and their views on how it informs the ways patients interact with healthcare professionals and services from the point of view of health professionals. We used an interpretive descriptive approach, conducting interviews and focus groups with oncology healthcare professionals (n = 21) at a University-affiliated western Canadian cancer treatment centre. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. We present an initial understanding of how CRII alters, informs and modulates patients' cancer experience and relates to their interactions with healthcare professionals and services. Findings were synthesised into two thematic categories: pragmatic concerns and priorities; and processes and practices. Healthcare professionals were supportive of patients' needs for more information, particularly at key points in the cancer trajectory when information may be lacking. Participants concurred that CRII could positively benefit patients and, if shared with their healthcare professional, could benefit the patient-healthcare professional relationship. Oncology healthcare professionals provide pivotal information to patients; thus, they are well situated to engage patients in discussions about CRII and incorporate this into patient encounters. These actions may open new lines of communication with patients, strengthen the patient-professional relationship and empower patients to be engaged in their own care.

Digital Health in Melanoma Posttreatment Care in Rural and Remote Australia: Systematic Review

Background

The melanoma incidence and mortality rates in rural and remote communities are exponentially higher than in urban areas. Digital health could be used to close the urban/rural gap for melanoma and improve access to posttreatment and support care services.

Objective

The aim of this review was to understand how digital health is currently used for melanoma posttreatment care and determine the benefits for Australian rural and remote areas.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, and Scopus was conducted in March 2018. Findings were clustered per type of intervention and related direct outcomes.

Results

Five studies met the inclusion criteria, but none investigated the benefits of digital health for melanoma posttreatment care in rural and remote areas of Australia. Some empirical studies demonstrated consumers’ acceptance of digital intervention for posttreatment care. The findings did not take into consideration individual, psychological, and socioeconomic factors, even though studies show their significant impacts on melanoma quality of aftercare.

Conclusions

Digital interventions may be used as an adjunct service by clinicians during melanoma posttreatment care, especially in regions that are less-resourced by practitioners and health infrastructure, such as rural and remote Australia. Technology could be used to reduce the disparity in melanoma incidence, mortality rates, and accessibility to posttreatment care management between urban and rural/remote populations.

E-health tools in oncology nursing: Perceptions of nurses and contributions to patient care and advanced practice

As oncology nurses confront a rapidly evolving field with increased workplace pressure, the integration of evidence-based connected health platforms within practice presents promise. This study explores nurses' perceptions regarding the utility of e-health tools, with a focus on the Oncology Interactive Navigator (OIN^TM), as a potential contributor to their practice and interactions with patients. Focus groups with oncology nurses were conducted at two time points: prior to exposure to the OIN^TM (T1, n=8) and four weeks post unrestricted tool access (T2, n=7). Using qualitative constant comparison analysis, three themes emerged: (1) Key factors driving e-health use are multidimensional and evolving; (2) Dual role of e-health in meeting patient needs and supporting practice; (3) E-health as a catalyst for professional development and networking. E-health is appealing to oncology nurses, as it serves to advance practice and support patient care. Future research should explore best practices for optimal clinical implementation among all stakeholders involved.

The promise of virtual navigation in cancer care: Insights from patients and health care providers

Virtual navigation (VN) in health care is a proactive process by which patients obtain information and support via Internet resources to manage their illness demands. The objective of this analysis was to explore converging and diverging perspectives of key stakeholders: patients with cancer and Health Care Providers (HCPs), about a cancer-related VN tool called the Oncology Interactive Navigator (OIN™). A qualitative secondary analysis was performed combining data sets from two prior studies exploring perspectives of VN among patients (study 1, n=20) and HCPs (study 2, n=13). An inductive approach was used to explore converging and diverging views across groups. Findings explore how patients' and HCPs' views converge and diverge and the processes necessary to ensure optimal uptake of VN innovations in cancer care.

Toward the development of a lupus interactive navigator to facilitate patients and their health care providers in the management of lupus: results of web-based surveys

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus is an inflammatory autoimmune disease associated with high morbidity and unacceptable mortality. Information and management tools are needed to help persons with lupus cope with their illness and facilitate health care providers in the delivery of care.

Objective

The objective of the study was to assess the needs and find solutions to support persons with lupus and their health care providers.

Methods

Web-based surveys were distributed across Canada to persons with lupus and their relatives (n=3119), rheumatologists (n=517), and arthritis health professionals (AHPs) (n=226) by Lupus Canada, the Canadian Rheumatology Association, and the Arthritis Health Professions Association, respectively.

Results

The survey sample comprised 665 (21.3%) persons with lupus, 98 (19.0%) rheumatologists, and 74 (32.7%) AHPs. Among the participants with lupus, 92.4% were female, the average age was 46.8 (SD 12.7) years, 79.2% were Caucasian, and 58.8% were employed. All Canadian provinces and territories were represented. The majority (43.3%) of respondents were from Ontario. Mean disease duration was 10.2 (SD 9.5) years, and 41.9% rated their global assessment as fair or poor. There was high agreement between lupus participants and health care providers regarding disease-specific information topics. All groups rated topics related to lupus, fatigue, medications, and stress as most important. Ratings differed among lupus participants and their health care providers regarding perceived helpfulness of some of the patient tools, such as the option to view test results. Needs differed for persons with lupus based on age, sex, depression, stress, and disease activity. Differences in health care provider needs were based on amount of experience in treating lupus.

Conclusions

Information and support tools needed for persons with lupus and their health care providers were identified. These results will help guide us in the development of a Web-based Lupus Interactive Navigator as an intervention tool to help persons with lupus self-manage their disease and to facilitate heath care providers in clinical management.

Nonmelanoma skin cancer: disease-specific quality-of-life concerns and distress

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To provide a better understanding of the disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) concerns of patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Skin cancer clinic of Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

SAMPLE

56 patients with basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Descriptive and inferential statistics applied to quantitative self-report data.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Importance of appearance, psychological distress, and QOL.

FINDINGS

The most prevalent concerns included worries about tumor recurrence, as well as the potential size and conspicuousness of the scar. Skin cancer-specific QOL concerns significantly predicted distress manifested through anxious and depressive symptomology. In addition, the social concerns related to the disease were the most significant predictor of distress.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study provide healthcare professionals with a broad picture of the most prevalent NMSC-specific concerns, as well as the concerns that are of particular importance for different subgroups of patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses are in a position to provide pivotal psychosocial and informational support to patients, so they need to be aware of the often-overlooked psychosocial effects of NMSC to address these issues and provide optimal care.

The Knowledge Exchange-Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs

Purpose

The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implementation of two cancer navigation programs in Canada.

Methods

The KE-DS Model guided the collection and analysis of interviews with program personnel and narrative data. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted wherein we compared and contrasted the planning and implementation of these two navigation programs.

Results

The planning and implementation of these two programs was conceptualized differently and adapted to meet local contingencies. The KE-DS Model highlighted three factors that influenced program delivery. First, the structure of health services was shaped by the interaction of professionals and services operating in the region, and the existing health services influenced the program’s approach to navigation. Second, while there were similarities in the professional roles and responsibilities of the navigators, these roles and responsibilities also reflected local context in their approaches to patient assessment, referral, education, coordination of services, and advocacy. Third, these two distinct approaches to navigation have responded to the needs of diverse populations being served by improving access to care.

Conclusions

Evidence generated using the KE-DS Model could ensure a more robust and structured approach to the planning and implementation of future navigation programs. The Model prompts users to make explicit the different types of evidence utilized during program planning and implementation. The systematic collection of new information on program implementation using the KE-DS Model in future initiatives will contribute to an improved understanding of the science of knowledge exchange.