Expectations from an integrative medicine consultation in breast cancer care: a registry protocol-based study

Trends in integrative medicine and health consults: differences between cancer survivors and patients without cancer

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to compare patients with and without cancer who sought an integrative health (IH) consult and reasons for seeking a consult.

DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional study that employed a secondary analysis of an integrative health database supplemented by a retrospective medical record review.

SETTING/LOCATION

Integrative Medicine and Health program in a Southwestern United States academic medical center.

SUBJECTS

Eight hundred thirty-nine adults over the age of 18 seeking IH consultation.

RESULTS

The number of complementary therapies reported prior to consult were not significantly different between groups. The most reported complementary therapies used by cancer survivors were multivitamins, exercise, and turmeric. Patients without cancer reported significantly higher pain levels than cancer survivors. Cancer survivors reported significantly higher energy, sleep levels, overall health, spiritual wellbeing, and significantly better relationships compared to patients without cancer. Cancer survivors reported fatigue and cancer as the top reasons for IH consult.

CONCLUSION

Participants without cancer reported higher levels of pain and lower levels of energy, sleep, overall health, spiritual wellbeing, and relationships compared to cancer survivors. However, cancer survivors still reported levels of unmanaged symptoms. Complementary therapy use prior to IMH consult was similar between groups; however, IMH providers recommended more treatments for patients without cancer. Our results highlight that more evidence is needed to guide IMH recommendations, especially for cancer survivors who may still be in treatment. Additionally, our results support evidence-based recommendations that all cancer survivors should be assessed for complementary therapy use and provided counseling by qualified providers on their advantages and limitations.

Integrating Complementary and Traditional Practices in Middle-Eastern Supportive Cancer Care

The Middle East is a promising arena in which researchers can explore the interchange between cross-cultural traditional medicine and supportive cancer care, as provided within an integrative oncology setting. Integrative oncology research and clinical practice in this part of the world have been focusing, for the most part, on the use of herbal medicine and mind-body-spiritual modalities, both of which are deeply rooted in traditional medical care. A regional, multinational, and interdisciplinary collaboration is currently being undertaken as part of the academic activities of the Middle-East Research Group in Integrative Oncology (MERGIO). This group is part of the Middle-East Cancer Consortium, a body supported by the National Cancer Institute. MERGIO currently facilitates a number of innovative educational, basic science, and clinical research projects that are investigating the effectiveness and safety of traditional herbal remedies. In order to create a structured, pragmatic "bedside-to-bench" and subsequent "back-to-bedside" approach, MERGIO has designed a patient-tailored integrative oncology model of supportive-palliative care. This approach addresses both patients' individual health belief models and the larger social-cultural-religious context, as defined by the health-related values of the patient's community.