Awareness of the adverse effects associated with prophylactic corticosteroid use during docetaxel therapy

A systemic review of taxanes and their side effects in metastatic breast cancer

Taxanes-containing chemotherapy constitutes an essential backbone for both early and metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the two major taxane drugs—paclitaxel and docetaxel—have distinct safety profiles. In this review, we summarize the safety outcome and management following treatment with both taxanes from selected clinical trials. We utilized PubMed to perform literature search before April 2021. Five phase III randomized controlled trials with reports of individual taxane adverse events (AEs) were included in this review. Grade 3/4 AEs were summarized and discussed extensively. The rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia were higher with docetaxel than with paclitaxel. For non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs, peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with paclitaxel while fluid retention was more frequent with docetaxel. Compared to paclitaxel, docetaxel had a higher rate of grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AEs. Grade 3/4 myalgia were generally comparable between the two taxanes. Except for neutropenia, the incidence rate of grade 3/4 AEs of taxanes was generally manageable. Peripheral neuropathy was more common with paclitaxel while grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with docetaxel.

Current cancer therapies and their influence on glucose control

This review focuses on the development of hyperglycemia arising from widely used cancer therapies spanning four drug classes. These groups of medications were selected due to their significant association with new onset hyperglycemia, or of potentially severe clinical consequences when present. These classes include glucocorticoids that are frequently used in addition to chemotherapy treatments, and the antimetabolite class of 5-fluorouracil-related drugs. Both of these classes have been in use in cancer therapy since the 1950s. Also considered are the phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitors that provide cancer response advantages by disrupting cell growth, proliferation and survival signaling pathways, and have been in clinical use as early as 2007. The final class to be reviewed are the monoclonal antibodies selected to function as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). These were first used in 2011 for advanced melanoma and are rapidly becoming widely utilized in many solid tumors. For each drug class, the literature has been reviewed to answer relevant questions about these medications related specifically to the characteristics of the hyperglycemia that develops with use. The incidence of new glucose elevations in euglycemic individuals, as well as glycemic changes in those with established diabetes has been considered, as has the expected onset of hyperglycemia from their first use. This comparison emphasizes that some classes exhibit very immediate impacts on glucose levels, whereas other classes can have lengthy delays of up to 1 year. A comparison of the spectrum of severity of hyperglycemic consequences stresses that the appearance of diabetic ketoacidosis is rare for all classes except for the ICIs. There are distinct differences in the reversibility of glucose elevations after treatment is stopped, as the mTOR inhibitors and ICI classes have persistent hyperglycemia long term. These four highlighted drug categories differ in their underlying mechanisms driving hyperglycemia, with clinical presentations ranging from potent yet transient insulin resistant states [type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) -like] to rare permanent insulin-deficient causes of hyperglycemia. Knowledge of the relative incidence of new onset hyperglycemia and the underlying causes are critical to appreciate how and when to best screen and treat patients taking any of these cancer drug therapies.

Incidence and disease course of new-onset diabetes mellitus in breast and colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A prospective multicenter cohort study

AIMS

To investigate the incidence of and risk factors for new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) developed during chemotherapy that included steroids in cancer patients without DM.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, and observational cohort study enrolled 299 cancer patients without DM (aged > 18 years), planning 4-8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The endpoints were the incidence, remission rate, and independent determinants of new-onset DM during chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between April 2015 and March 2018, 270 subjects with colorectal cancer or breast cancer (mean age, 51.0 years) completed the follow up (mean 39 months). Of whom, 17 subjects (6.3%) developed DM within a median time of 90 days (range, 17-359 days). Male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 15.839; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.004-125.20) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) at baseline (HR, 8.307; CI, 1.826-37.786) were independent risk factors. Six months after chemotherapy completion, 11/17 subjects (64.7%) experienced DM remission, associated with a significantly higher C-peptide level at baseline (C-peptide levels, 1.3 ng/mL in subjects with remission and 0.9 ng/mL in subjects without remission, age- and sex-adjusted P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

DM incidence was 6.3% in patients who received chemotherapy with dexamethasone. Close monitoring for hyperglycemia is recommended, especially for men with IFG.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03062072).

Comparative study of oral and IV dexamethasone premedication in the prevention of docetaxel induced allergic reactions

BACKGROUND

The hypersensitivity reactions after docetaxel administration is a main concern in this study. The aim of this study is to check the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) after receiving a single dose of intravenous dexamethasone before docetaxel administration.

METHOD

In this retrospective study, 1 year data from Jan 1st 2018 to Dec 31st 2018 was retrieved from hospital information system (HIS). We examined 210 patients who visited hospital during the last 12 months during their cancer treatment and took dexamethasone orally 3 days prior to docetaxel administration or 20 mg intravenously before 15 minutes of docetaxel.

RESULTS

Out of 210 patients, only 50 patients were taking IV dexamethasone injection prior to docetaxel constitutes only 23.5% while patients who were taking oral dexamethasone were found to be 160 which constitutes 75%. There was no hypersensitivity reaction with oral and IV dexamethasone before docetaxel administration. Majority of the patients were without taking oral dexamethasone before docetaxel administration which not only saved time but also improve patient compliance.

CONCLUSION

No hypersensitivity reaction had been found either in oral or intravenous dexamethasone prior to docetaxel administration by using patient data from Hospital Information System (HIS). However, intravenous dexamethasone not only improve patient compliance but also reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions but the cost of intravenous dexamethasone is higher than the cost of oral dexamethasone. In conclusion, single dose of intravenous IV dexamethasone is preferred treatment option.

Hyperglycemia during Adjuvant Chemotherapy as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients without Diabetes

Purpose

Breast cancer treatments, including chemotherapy, administered in combination with glucocorticoids can induce hyperglycemia. This study aimed to investigate the effect of hyperglycemia during adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of breast cancer patients without a known history of diabetes.

Methods

In this study, 936 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from 2010 to 2015 were initially selected as participants. Chemotherapy-related hyperglycemia was defined as fasting plasma glucose levels ≥ 100 mg/dL or random blood glucose levels ≥ 140 mg/dL during 2 or more cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. After dividing the patients into the euglycemia and hyperglycemia groups, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and survival outcomes were analyzed by propensity score matching.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 47.4 ± 7.7 years, and the median follow-up period was 70.1 months. Eighty-two patients (19.4%) were diagnosed as having hyperglycemia. There were significant differences between the euglycemia and hyperglycemia groups with respect to age, hypertension, body mass index, axillary surgery extents, nodal stage, and total steroid dosage. T stage, vascular invasion, and hyperglycemia were identified as prognostic factors of relapse-free survival (RFS). The 5-year RFS rates were 92.0% and 82.3% in the euglycemia and hyperglycemia groups, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.011). The 5-year overall survival rates were 94.6% and 92.0% in the euglycemia and hyperglycemia groups, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.113).

Conclusion

These data suggest that hyperglycemia during adjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic factor for RFS in breast cancer patients without diabetes.

Effect of high-dose dexamethasone on patients without diabetes during elective neurosurgery: a prospective study

Introduction

The peri-operative use of high-dose dexamethasone to reduce cerebral oedema may result in worsening glycaemic control in people with diabetes and glucocorticoid-induced diabetes in susceptible individuals. This study aims to examine the incidence of glucocorticoid-induced diabetes in a cohort of neurosurgical patients receiving high-dose dexamethasone peri-operatively.

Materials and methods

Adult non-diabetic neurosurgical patients receiving high-dose dexamethasone were prospectively studied. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, HbA1c > 6.0%, and use of anti-diabetes therapies. The following data were collected: Family history of diabetes, body mass index, fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and HbA1c (prior to surgery and 6 weeks after last dose of dexamethasone). Homeostatic model assessment values were calculated. Peri-operative glucose readings were recorded and 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests performed at the end of 6 weeks. Paired student t tests and multiple linear regressions were used.

Results

Data from 21 participants (11 women) were available. The mean total dose of dexamethasone was 96 ± 34 mg, and treatment duration was 17 ± 7 days. A total of 105 random blood glucose levels were documented peri-operatively (mean 7.0 ± 1.0 mmol/L). Six weeks following cessation of dexamethasone course, none of the participants developed diabetes, defined either by fasting glucose or by 75 g OGTT. There was a statistically significant increase in the mean HOMA-β from 81.5 to 102.1% (p = 0.01) and a significant decrease in the mean fasting glucose from 5.7 to 4.8 mmol/L (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The use of high-dose dexamethasone in this cohort of neurosurgical patients did not result in glucocorticoid-induced diabetes. Hyperglycaemia was transient and had resolved by 6 weeks.

Successful downstaging of locally recurrent penile squamous cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) based regimen followed by curative surgery

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a relatively rare disease in Western world but is a significant health problem in developing countries like India. We report here a case of successful multimodality management of recurrent pSCC with pelvic lymphadenopathy in a 56-year-old male patient with poorly controlled diabetes. The patient presented with ulceroproliferative growth over the residual penile stump clinically involving root of penis and with right pelvic lymphadenopathy. The patient had a history of partial penectomy done elsewhere 20 months ago. In view of the comorbidities, locally recurrent disease and presence of right Iliac lymphadenopathy, the patient was treated with nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS), cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF regimen) in the neoadjuvant setting followed by staged surgical resection. This is the first case report showing successful treatment of recurrent pSCC with NDLS-based TPF regimen in the neoadjuvant setting followed by staged surgery in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes.

Changes in glucose-lowering drug use before and after cancer diagnosis in patients with diabetes

AIM

This study explores the changes in glucose-lowering drug (GLD) use before and after cancer diagnosis among patients with diabetes.

METHODS

New GLD users (1998-2011) living in the Dutch ECR-PHARMO catchment area were selected from the PHARMO Database Network (n=52,228). Those with a primary cancer diagnosis were considered cases (n=3281) and matched with eligible controls (n=12,891) without cancer during follow-up. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to assess changes in GLD use, such as treatment add-ons, treatments drops and initiation of insulin, for cases compared with controls associated with specific cancer types in four time windows (6-3 and 0-3months before cancer diagnosis; 0-3 and 3-6months after cancer diagnosis).

RESULTS

In the 3months before cancer diagnosis, patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (oesophageal, stomach, pancreatic, liver cancers) had higher odds of initiating insulin (OR: 9.3; 95% CI: 3.6-24.1); to a lesser extent, this was also observed in the 3months prior to that (at 6months, OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.3-12.1). Diagnosis of colorectal (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.4-8.4), pulmonary (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.1-5.4) and upper GI (OR: 13.6; 95% CI: 5.0-36.9) cancers was associated with increased odds of initiating insulin in the 3months after cancer diagnosis. During all study time windows, the odds of treatment drops were higher for patients with upper GI cancers whereas, for most other cancers, these odds were higher only after a diagnosis of cancer.

CONCLUSION

The greater odds of initiating insulin during the 6months prior to diagnosis of upper GI cancers suggest reverse causation. After cancer diagnosis, drops in use of GLDs was commonly seen.

Doceaqualip in a patient with prostate cancer who had an allergic reaction to conventional docetaxel: A case report

Docetaxel has been widely used in the treatment of several cancers, including adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. As docetaxel is insoluble in water, it must be administered with polysorbate 80 and ethanol, which are known to cause hypersensitivity reactions. Premedication with corticosteroids and antihistamines is advocated prior to docetaxel administration; however, toxicities, occasionally fatal, have been reported, even with corticosteroid premedication. We herein report the case of a patient with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with bone metastasis and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <2, who developed an allergic reaction to conventional docetaxel (Taxotere), despite being premedicated with corticosteroids and antihistamines. The patient was managed with corticosteroids and antihistamines, and was later started on Doceaqualip, a nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension. Doceaqualip was well-tolerated by the patient and 5 cycles were subsequently administered, without any adverse reactions. Adenocarcinoma also regressed, as evidenced by positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

A Pilot Study Evaluating Steroid-Induced Diabetes after Antiemetic Dexamethasone Therapy in Chemotherapy-Treated Cancer Patients

Purpose

Dexamethasone is a mainstay antiemetic regimen for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the incidence of and factors associated with steroid-induced diabetes in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with dexamethasone as an antiemetic.

Materials and Methods

Non-diabetic patients with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer who received at least three cycles of highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy with dexamethasone as an antiemetic were enrolled. Fasting plasma glucose levels, 2-hour postprandial glucose levels, and hemoglobin A_1C tests for the diagnosis of diabetes were performed before chemotherapy and at 3 and 6 months after the start of chemotherapy. The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was used as an index for measurement of insulin resistance, defined as a HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5.

Results

Between January 2012 and November 2013, 101 patients with no history of diabetes underwent laboratory tests for assessment of eligibility; 77 of these patients were included in the analysis. Forty-five patients (58.4%) were insulin resistant and 17 (22.1%) developed steroid-induced diabetes at 3 or 6 months after the first chemotherapy, which included dexamethasone as an antiemetic. Multivariate analysis showed significant association of the incidence of steroid-induced diabetes with the cumulative dose of dexamethasone (p=0.049).

Conclusion

We suggest that development of steroid-induced diabetes after antiemetic dexamethasone therapy occurs in approximately 20% of non-diabetic cancer patients; this is particularly significant for patients receiving high doses of dexamethasone.