How does pain experience relate to the need for pain relief? A secondary exploratory analysis in a large sample of cancer patients

Relationship between prescribed opioids, pain management satisfaction, and pain intensity in oncology outpatients

BACKGROUND

Pain is the most severe and commonest symptom for patients with cancer. Patients' pain management satisfaction is an essential indicator of quality care and further affects their willingness to seek care.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the correlations between patients' prescribed opioids, pain management satisfaction, and pain intensity.

METHODS

This study adopted a cross-sectional correlation design, recruited a total of 123 patients with cancer pain through convenience sampling, and used two research scales, namely the Chinese version of the Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale and the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that the correlations of prescribed opioid dosage with pain management satisfaction (r =  - .10, p > .05) and pain intensity (worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now; r =  - .05 to .01, p > .05) were nonsignificant. The correlations of pain management satisfaction with pain intensity (r = .24 to .32, p < .01), pain interference (r = .32, p < .01), and pain relief (r =  - .25, p < .01) were all significant, but that with the worst pain (r = .06, p > .05) was nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical professionals providing cancer pain management should focus on medicines strategies and individuals' pain relief requirements. In particular, patients with the worst pain require extra investigations into their needs, and their satisfaction with their level of pain should be further evaluated.

Interpreting and Acting on PRO Results in Clinical Practice: Lessons Learned From the PatientViewpoint System and Beyond

INTRODUCTION

We have used several methods to aid in the interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, and to suggest recommendations for acting on them, both within the PatientViewpoint system and in work done since.

METHODS FOR INTERPRETING PRO SCORES

For identifying possibly concerning change scores, PatientViewpoint uses questionnaires' minimally important differences or score worsening >½ SD. For poor scores in absolute terms, PatientViewpoint primarily uses distributions based on normative data (eg, worst quartile, >2 SD from the mean). To advance methods for score interpretation, we explored using needs assessments to identify health-related quality-of-life scores associated with unmet needs and requiring follow-up. We also investigated the ability of PRO scores to predict patients' most bothersome issues.

METHODS FOR ADDRESSING PRO RESULTS

To develop suggestions for addressing issues identified by PRO questionnaires, we conducted a targeted literature review, interviewed experts from different disciplines, developed draft recommendations based on the literature and interviews, and finalized the recommendations in a consensus meeting with all experts.

DISCUSSION

The needs assessment method requires strongly correlated content in the needs assessment and health-related quality-of-life questionnaire. Additional research is needed to explore using the worst scores in absolute terms to identify patients' most bothersome issues. The approach described for developing suggestions for addressing PRO results focuses on local resources and is best-suited for a local context.

KEY POINTS

A combination of pragmatic solutions and exploratory research can inform interpreting and acting on PRO scores.

Prevalence and possible predictors of sexual dysfunction and self-reported needs related to the sexual life of advanced cancer patients

Background: Sexual dysfunction and problems are common late effects after treatment of cancer. However, little is known about the prevalence and risk factors for sexual dysfunction in patients with advanced cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and predictors of sexual problems and needs in a large sample of Danish patients with advanced cancer. Methodology: The data derived from a representative cross-sectional study of patients with advanced cancer. Patients who had been in contact with 1 of 54 hospital departments were invited to fill out a questionnaire on symptoms and problems. Five items asked about sexuality. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with sexual functioning in explorative analyses. Results: A total of 1,447 patients completed the questionnaire and of those, 961 patients (66%) completed the sexuality items. More than half of the patients (60%) had not been sexually active within the previous month, despite a high prevalence of desire for sexual intimacy (62%). More than half of the patients (57%) experienced that their physical condition or treatment had impaired their sex life. Of those, 52% experienced an unmet need for help with sexual problems from the health care system. Older patients were less likely to report sexual problems than younger patients. Having prostate or gynecologic cancer was associated with the feeling that one's sexual life was negatively influenced. Conclusion: Sexual problems are common among patients with advanced cancer and should be addressed by the health care system.

Nausea in advanced cancer: relationships between intensity, burden, and the need for help

PURPOSE

This study aimed at expanding the knowledge of nausea in patients with advanced cancer by elucidating (a) the prevalences of patients having nausea, experiencing nausea as a problem, and having a need for help with their nausea, respectively, (b) determining variables associated with nausea, and (c) investigating the relation between nausea and the need for help regarding nausea.

METHODS

In 2004-2006, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Three-Levels-of-Needs Questionnaire (3LNQ) were mailed to 2364 patients with advanced cancer who had been in contact with one of the 54 hospital departments within the past year. Further information was collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Patient-response rate was 61%. Twenty-two percent reported having had some degree of nausea within the past week, with a mean nausea score of 10.4 and a two-item combined nausea and vomiting score of 7.5 (0-100, 100 = "very much"). Factors associated with nausea on the multivariate level were contact type (inpatient/outpatient) and treatment status (receiving ongoing oncologic treatment yes/no). "Nausea intensity" and "nausea problem burden" showed acceptable abilities to distinguish between patients having or not having an unmet need for help regarding nausea with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.81 and 0.82, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Around one in four patients with advanced cancer reported nausea within the past week, highest in patients who were inpatients or undergoing active oncologic treatment. Almost all patients reporting nausea on the EORTC QLQ-C30 experienced this to be a problem, and the 3LNQ can therefore be restricted to cases where additional details are needed.