Treating an oft-unrecognized and troublesome entity: using gastric electrical stimulation to reduce symptoms of malignancy-associated gastroparesis

Electrogastrography in Adult Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a delay in gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction, lacking a clear pathophysiological mechanism, but with multiple histological abnormalities including loss of interstitial cells of Cajal, which may alter slow waves. We can assess slow waves with electrogastrography.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and range of abnormalities in gastric slow waves in adults with gastroparesis using electrogastrography.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. We included studies with patients older than 18 years with gastroparesis, assessed using electrogastrography. We evaluated the percentage of duration of the recording in which the dominant power was in normogastria, tachygastria, and bradygastria; dominant frequency; power ratio; change in post-stimulus dominant power; and dominant frequency instability coefficient. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Data were synthesized using narrative summary and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3730 articles were reviewed, including 31 articles with 1545 patients and 340 controls. Compared to controls, gastroparetics patients had less normogastria (fasting: 50.3% versus 65.8%) (post-stimulus: 54.3% versus 66.5%), more bradygastria (fasting: 37.7% versus 13%) (post-stimulus: 31.9% versus 16.3%), and more tachygastria (fasting: 16.1% versus 4.6%) (post-stimulus: 18.3% versus 5.2%). Gastroparetics had less change in post-stimulus dominant power (1.45 dB versus 5.03 dB) and less power ratio (1.4 versus 5.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastroparetic patients present abnormalities in the frequency and changes in the post-stimulus power of slow waves, possibly secondary to a reduced number of interstitial cells of Cajal, as described in these patients.

Abnormalities on Electrogastrography in Nausea and Vomiting Syndromes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Comparison to Other Gastric Disorders

BACKGROUND

Functional nausea and vomiting syndromes and gastroparesis, collectively grouped as nausea and vomiting syndromes (NVS), are overlapping conditions with incompletely understood pathophysiology. Gastric slow wave abnormalities are thought to contribute.

AIMS

This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the prevalence of slow wave abnormalities measured by electrogastrography (EGG) in patients with NVS.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE classic, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched for articles using EGG in adults (≥ 18 years) with NVS. EGG metrics of interest were percentage time in bradygastria, normogastria, and tachygastria as well as dominant frequency and dominant power. Outcomes were also compared with functional dyspepsia (FD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD), and control cohorts.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and sixty NVS patients and 308 controls were included from 24 studies. Overall, 64% of patients had EGG abnormalities. Average percent time in normogastria was low during fasting (50%; 95% CI 40-63%) and fed (53%; 95% CI 41-68%) states in patients, with substantial periods in fasting bradygastria (34.1%; 95% CI 25-47%) and postprandial tachygastria (21%; 95% CI 17-26%). Across gastric disorders, pooling of 84 studies showed a comparably high prevalence of EGG abnormalities in NVS (24 studies; n = 760) and GORD (13 studies; n = 427), compared to FD (47 studies; n = 1751) and controls (45 studies; n = 1027).

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency-based gastric slow wave abnormalities are prominent in NVS. The strength and consistency of these associations across many studies suggests that gastric dysrhythmia may be an important factor in NVS, motivating the development of more reliable methods for their clinical assessment.

Nausea and Vomiting in 2021: A Comprehensive Update

GOAL

A comprehensive review of treatments for nausea and vomiting (N/V).

BACKGROUND

N/V are common symptoms encountered in medicine. While most cases of acute N/V related to a specific cause can be straightforward to manage, other cases of acute N/V such as chemotherapy-induced N/V and especially chronic unexplained N/V can be difficult to control, leading to a significant decline in the patient's quality of life and increased cost of medical care from repeated hospitalizations.

STUDY

Traditional management has relied on pharmacotherapy which may be inadequate in a certain proportion of these patients. Many of the medications used in the management of N/V have significant side effect profiles making the need for new and improved interventions of great importance.

RESULTS

This review covers a broad review of the pathophysiology of N/V, pharmacotherapy, including safety concerns and controversies with established pharmaceuticals, newer immunotherapies, bioelectrical neuromodulation (including gastric electrical stimulation), behavioral and surgical therapies, and complementary medicine.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of emerging understandings of the pathophysiology of N/V, improved therapies are becoming available.

Electroceuticals in the Gastrointestinal Tract

The field of electroceuticals has attracted considerable attention over the past few decades as a novel therapeutic modality. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract (GIT) holds significant potential as a target for electroceuticals as the intersection of neural, endocrine, and immune systems. We review recent developments in electrical stimulation of various portions of the GIT (including esophagus, stomach, and small and large intestine) and nerves projecting to the GIT and supportive organs. This has been tested with varying degrees of success for several dysmotility, inflammatory, hormonal, and neurologic disorders. We outline a vision for the future of GI electroceuticals, building on advances in mechanistic understanding of GI physiology coupled with novel ingestible technologies. The next wave of electroceutical therapies will be minimally invasive and more targeted than current approaches, making them an indispensable tool in the clinical armamentarium.

Gastrointestinal Motility Issues in Cancer Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper seeks to highlight GI motility disorders that are frequently present in patients with a malignancy. GI dysmotility can occur due to the cancer itself or as a consequence of medical and surgical treatments. Often, symptoms are nonspecific and the diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. The goal of the paper is to review the common motility problems seen in patients with cancer, their clinical manifestations, and options for management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies show that newer endoscopy techniques such as endoscopic mucosal dissection can cause esophageal dysmotility. Opioid-induced constipation is frequently encountered in patients with cancer. Motility disorders in cancer patient can lead to clinical morbidity, poor quality of life, and malnutrition. Newer diagnostic tests and medical and surgical treatments may be helpful in improving the diagnosis and management of these disorders.

Gastric Electrical Stimulation Is an Effective Treatment Modality for Refractory Gastroparesis in a Postsurgical Patient with Pancreatic Cancer

Gastroparesis-related hospital visits contribute significantly to healthcare costs. Gastroparesis can lead to chronic symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, bloating, early satiety, and abdominal pain. It can result in a significant impairment of quality of life. Diabetes and postsurgery are common causes for gastroparesis, but most cases of gastroparesis are idiopathic in presumed etiology. Malignancy-related gastroparesis has also recently been described in the literature, and pancreatic cancer is a malignancy commonly associated with gastroparesis. Whipple surgery for pancreatic cancer is often complicated by gastroparesis during its postoperative course. We report a case where gastric electrical stimulation was an effective treatment option in the treatment of refractory malignancy-related gastroparesis.

Gastric Electrical Stimulator for Treatment of Gastroparesis

Patients with gastroparesis sometimes suffer from intractable nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, and bloating, as well as a host of other symptoms that can often be difficult to control. Initially, patients are treated conservatively; some do well with conservative management but unfortunately some do not. Over the years, studies have shown the benefits of gastric electrical stimulation, which often results in symptomatic improvement and improvement in gastric emptying times. This article discusses the history of gastric electrical stimulation and its use in clinical practice to help those suffering from gastroparesis that is refractory to conservative medical management.