1
|
Scott HM, Braybrook D, Harðardóttir D, Ellis-Smith C, Harding R. Implementation of child-centred outcome measures in routine paediatric healthcare practice: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:63. [PMID: 37394520 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02143-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) are commonly used in routine adult healthcare to measure and improve outcomes, but less attention has been paid to PCOMs in children's services. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and synthesise existing evidence of the determinants, strategies, and mechanisms that influence the implementation of PCOMs into paediatric healthcare practice. METHODS The review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databased searched included CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo. Google scholar was also searched for grey literature on 25th March 2022. Studies were included if the setting was a children's healthcare service, investigating the implementation or use of an outcome measure or screening tool in healthcare practice, and reported outcomes relating to use of a measure. Data were tabulated and thematically analysed through deductive coding to the constructs of the adapted-Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results were presented as a narrative synthesis, and a logic model developed. RESULTS We retained 69 studies, conducted across primary (n = 14), secondary (n = 13), tertiary (n = 37), and community (n = 8) healthcare settings, including both child self-report (n = 46) and parent-proxy (n = 47) measures. The most frequently reported barriers to measure implementation included staff lack of knowledge about how the measure may improve care and outcomes; the complexity of using and implementing the measure; and a lack of resources to support implementation and its continued use including funding and staff. The most frequently reported facilitators of implementation and continued use include educating and training staff and families on: how to implement and use the measure; the advantages of using PCOMs over current practice; and the benefit their use has on patient care and outcomes. The resulting logic model presents the mechanisms through which strategies can reduce the barriers to implementation and support the use of PCOMs in practice. CONCLUSIONS These findings can be used to support the development of context-specific implementation plans through a combination of existing strategies. This will enable the implementation of PCOMs into routine paediatric healthcare practice to empower settings to better identify and improve child-centred outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospero CRD 42022330013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah May Scott
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK.
| | - Debbie Braybrook
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Daney Harðardóttir
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morris AC, Ibrahim Z, Heslin M, Moghraby OS, Stringaris A, Grant IM, Zalewski L, Pritchard M, Stewart R, Hotopf M, Pickles A, Dobson RJB, Simonoff E, Downs J. Assessing the feasibility of a web-based outcome measurement system in child and adolescent mental health services - myHealthE a randomised controlled feasibility pilot study. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2023; 28:128-147. [PMID: 35684987 PMCID: PMC10083915 DOI: 10.1111/camh.12571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in internet-based patient reported outcome measure (PROM) collection is increasing. The NHS myHealthE (MHE) web-based monitoring system was developed to address the limitations of paper-based PROM completion. MHE provides a simple and secure way for families accessing Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services to report clinical information and track their child's progress. This study aimed to assess whether MHE improves the completion of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) compared with paper collection. Secondary objectives were to explore caregiver satisfaction and application acceptability. METHODS A 12-week single-blinded randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial of MHE was conducted with 196 families accessing neurodevelopmental services in south London to examine whether electronic questionnaires are completed more readily than paper-based questionnaires over a 3-month period. Follow up process evaluation phone calls with a subset (n = 8) of caregivers explored system satisfaction and usability. RESULTS MHE group assignment was significantly associated with an increased probability of completing an SDQ-P in the study period (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 12.1, 95% CI 4.7-31.0; p = <.001). Of those caregivers' who received the MHE invitation (n = 68) 69.1% completed an SDQ using the platform compared to 8.8% in the control group (n = 68). The system was well received by caregivers, who cited numerous benefits of using MHE, for example, real-time feedback and ease of completion. CONCLUSIONS MHE holds promise for improving PROM completion rates. Research is needed to refine MHE, evaluate large-scale MHE implementation, cost effectiveness and explore factors associated with differences in electronic questionnaire uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C. Morris
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Zina Ibrahim
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - Margaret Heslin
- Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Argyris Stringaris
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Emotion & Development Branch, National Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Ian M. Grant
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lukasz Zalewski
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Megan Pritchard
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - Robert Stewart
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - Matthew Hotopf
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - Andrew Pickles
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - Richard J. B. Dobson
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - Emily Simonoff
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - Johnny Downs
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morris AC, Ibrahim Z, Moghraby OS, Stringaris A, Grant IM, Zalewski L, McClellan S, Moriarty G, Simonoff E, Dobson RJB, Downs J. Moving from development to implementation of digital innovations within the NHS: myHealthE, a remote monitoring system for tracking patient outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231211551. [PMID: 37954687 PMCID: PMC10638880 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231211551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This paper aims to report our experience of developing, implementing, and evaluating myHealthE (MHE), a digital innovation for Child and Adolescents Mental Health Services (CAMHS), which automates the remote collection and reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into National Health Services (NHS) electronic healthcare records. Methods We describe the logistical and governance issues encountered in developing the MHE interface with patient-identifiable information, and the steps taken to overcome these development barriers. We describe the application's architecture and hosting environment to enable its operability within the NHS, as well as the capabilities needed within the technical team to bridge the gap between academic development and NHS operational teams. Results We present evidence on the feasibility and acceptability of this system within clinical services and the process of iterative development, highlighting additional functions that were incorporated to increase system utility. Conclusion This article provides a framework with which to plan, develop, and implement automated PROM collection from remote devices back to NHS infrastructure. The challenges and solutions described in this paper will be pertinent to other digital health innovation researchers aspiring to deploy interoperable systems within NHS clinical systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C Morris
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zina Ibrahim
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Omer S Moghraby
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Argyris Stringaris
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Emotion & Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ian M Grant
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Lukasz Zalewski
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Garry Moriarty
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emily Simonoff
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Richard JB Dobson
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Johnny Downs
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manikowski A, Williamson Lewis R, Bennett T, Miller H, Mertens A, Wasilewski-Masker K, Escoffery C, Gilleland Marchak J. Implementation of Electronic Psychosocial Screening Among Caregivers in Pediatric Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1198-e1208. [DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the reach and implementation of an electronic psychosocial screening program among caregivers of pediatric oncology patients, as well as characterize caregiver distress. METHODS: Participants (N = 2,013) included caregivers of patients age 0-17.99 years presenting across 9,280 outpatient oncology visits (median = 2; range = 1-52) from September 2018 to June 2019. At check-ins, caregivers electronically completed the pediatric distress thermometer via a patient-facing electronic health record (EHR) application. Caregiver distress ratings ≥ 8 triggered electronic alerts to medical teams to refer for social work support at point of care. Patient clinical and demographic differences in reach and fidelity were evaluated using univariate chi-square and t-tests. Caregivers reporting high distress were compared with caregivers without reports of high distress using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The e-screening program was able to reach a caregiver for nearly all children seen during the study period, with 95.5% (1,923/2,013) of patients having a caregiver-completed pediatric distress thermometer. On screeners where caregivers reported high distress, medical teams made appropriate referrals to social work 95.5% (471/493) of the time. Overall, 16.9% (325/1,923) of caregivers ever indicated high distress (score ≥ 8), with caregivers of newly diagnosed (odds ratio = 3.16; 95% CI, 2.12 to 4.71) and on-therapy (odds ratio = 2.81; 95% CI, 2.11 to 3.76) patients being more likely to report high distress, compared with those who were off-treatment for the entire study. CONCLUSION: Leveraging EHR technology to provide evidence-based psychosocial screening can aid in successfully reaching a significant proportion of caregivers of pediatric oncology patients to identify and respond to ongoing psychosocial distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Manikowski
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Tonya Bennett
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Ann Mertens
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Karen Wasilewski-Masker
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jordan Gilleland Marchak
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sadeh Y, Dekel R, Brezner A, Landa J, Silberg T. Families following pediatric traumatic medical events: identifying psychosocial risk profiles using latent profile analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2022; 13:2116825. [PMID: 36186160 PMCID: PMC9518403 DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2116825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) are often experienced by children and family members after pediatric traumatic medical events (PTMEs). Assessing families' psychosocial risk factors is a crucial part of trauma-informed practice as it helps identify risk for PTSS in the aftermath of PTME. OBJECTIVES Using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 (PAT2.0), this study describes the psychosocial risk of families following PTMEs in two ways: 1. Describing the psychosocial risk defined by the PAT2.0 based on three-tiered risk levels; 2. Using latent profile analysis (LPA); identifying psychosocial risk profiles and examining how child- and injury-related factors can affect profile membership. METHODS Caregivers of 374 children following PTMEs admitted to a pediatric rehabilitation department in Israel completed the PAT2.0. Total PAT2.0 score and the seven PAT2.0 subscales (family structure/resources, social support, child problems, sibling problems, family problems, caregiver stress reactions, and family beliefs) were included in the first analysis. Mean PAT2.0 scores of three risk categories (universal, targeted, clinical) were calculated; LPA, which allows for cross-sectional latent variable mixture models to identify heterogeneity within a population, and multinomial logistic regressions using six out of the seven PAT2.0 subscales, were used to determine distinct profile differences and predictors of profile membership. RESULTS The three-tiered risk levels revealed were relatively high, as compared to levels in families of children with other clinical diagnoses. LPA yielded a three-profile solution: low family risk (63.53%); high caregiver stress, above-average levels of family risk (22.5%); and sibling problems, above-average levels of family risk (13.94%). Ethnicity and type of injury predicted group membership. CONCLUSION Families of children following PTMEs are at increased psychosocial risk. A clinically useful approach to identifying and preventing PTSS may be to evaluate specific domain patterns rather than just the total PAT2.0 risk level alone, based on the PAT2.0 subscales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaara Sadeh
- The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, the Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center at Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel Dekel
- The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Amichai Brezner
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, the Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center at Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Jana Landa
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, the Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center at Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-aviv, Israel
| | - Tamar Silberg
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, the Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center at Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evaluation of an electronic psycho-oncological adaptive screening program (EPAS) with immediate patient feedback: findings from a German cluster intervention study. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 16:1401-1413. [PMID: 34735695 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01121-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Distress screening has become mandatory and essential in comprehensive cancer care. We evaluated an electronic psycho-oncological adaptive screening (EPAS) which assesses objective indicators of care needs and subjectively perceived care needs and subsequently provides patient feedback with individualized recommendations about psychosocial care services. METHODS Patients were assessed within clusters, i.e., different oncological facilities of the competence network of the University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH). Patients in the intervention arm underwent the screening, controls received standard care. Patients were assessed at baseline (t0), 3-month (t1), and 6-month (t2) follow-up. Outcomes included information level and use of/access to nine psychosocial services at UCCH, well-being (GAD-7, PHQ-9, SF-8), and treatment satisfaction (SCCC). Conditional linear and logistic regressions were used to identify screening effects at t1 and t2. RESULTS Of 1320 eligible patients across 11 clusters, 660 were included (50%). The average age was 60 years; 46% were female. The intervention was associated with increased information level for all psychosocial services at t1 and t2 (all p < .001), increased use in some of these services at t1 and t2, respectively (p ≤ .02), and better evaluation of access (e.g., more recommendations for services provided by physicians, p < .01). At t2, the intervention was associated with a lower level of satisfaction with disease-related information (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS EPAS may improve information about psychosocial services as well as utilization of and access to these services. The effect on information level seems not to be generalizable to other aspects of oncological care. Future studies should incorporate novel technologies and condense the procedure to its core factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The screening may help to enhance self-management competencies among cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was retrospectively registered (2/2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04749056).
Collapse
|
7
|
Hanmer J, Ray KN, McCracken P, Ferrante L, Wardlaw S, Fleischman L, Wolfson D. Uptake of an Integrated Electronic Questionnaire System in Community Pediatric Clinics. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:310-319. [PMID: 33853141 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aimed to evaluate an integrated electronic questionnaire system implementation in outpatient community pediatric practices on workflow, completion rates, and recorded scores. METHODS We evaluated the implementation and outcomes of an integrated electronic questionnaire system at 45 community pediatric practices that used standardized questionnaires to screen for autism, depression, and substance use and to measure asthma control. Electronic health record (EHR) data for all well child visits were extracted for the 3 months before and after implementation. We used statistical process control charts to evaluate questionnaire completion rates and Chi-square tests to evaluate screening completion and positive screening rates. The collection and entry of questionnaire information was observed and timed. RESULTS EHR data included 107,120 encounters across 45 practices that showed significant and sustained improvement in completion rates for all questionnaires. The rate of recorded concerning questionnaires decreased for asthma control (19.3 vs. 12.8%, p < 0.001), stayed the same for autism (96.6 vs. 96.2%, p = 0.38), decreased for depression (9.5 vs. 6.7%, p ≤ 0.001), and increased for any substance use (9.8 vs. 12.8%, p < 0.001). Twelve practices were observed, and patient time and staff time managing questionnaires were decreased after implementation. DISCUSSION Electronic questionnaire administration saved staff time and patient time. We report overall improvement in questionnaire completion rates, with notable variation in improvement in completion across practices and in change in concerning recorded result rates across measures. CONCLUSION Conversion of four standard paper questionnaires to an integrated electronic system reduces patient and staff time while increasing completion rates when well integrated into routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janel Hanmer
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Kristin N Ray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Polly McCracken
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Lorraine Ferrante
- UPMC Children's Community Pediatrics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Sharon Wardlaw
- UPMC Children's Community Pediatrics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Lauren Fleischman
- UPMC Children's Community Pediatrics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - David Wolfson
- UPMC Children's Community Pediatrics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anderson LM, Papadakis JL, Vesco AT, Shapiro JB, Feldman MA, Evans MA, Weissberg-Benchell J. Patient-Reported and Parent Proxy-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Medical Specialty Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Implementation. J Pediatr Psychol 2020; 45:247-265. [PMID: 31710671 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsz082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 08/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Youth with chronic illness are at higher risk for psychosocial difficulties, leading to a call for screening via patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of the current review is to summarize PRO implementation in pediatric medical specialty settings. A literature review of PRO implementation in these settings, conceptual issues, value and approach, legal and ethical concerns, as well as a case example of PROA in type 1 diabetes are presented. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant articles published since the most recent Journal of Pediatric Psychology Special Issue on Evidence-Based Assessment in Pediatric Psychology (2008). RESULTS Thirty-two articles were identified and reviewed. The majority of studies reported that PROA was feasible, did not disrupt clinic flow, identified psychosocial issues warranting intervention, and was acceptable to families and providers. Response to elevated scores and impact on behavioral health referrals varied. CONCLUSION While many evidenced-based assessment measures are well-validated within pediatric chronic illness groups, the literature regarding implementation of PROs is still emerging. Research findings are promising, with PROs being feasible, acceptable, and leading to increased discussion of psychosocial issues when integrated into pediatric medical settings. Additional research is needed to evaluate the longitudinal impact of PROs and the optimal manner of responding to assessment data, particularly when clinically-elevated. Ultimately, identifying psychosocial issues in pediatric medical settings can promote optimal health and well-being of youth with chronic illness and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anthony T Vesco
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | | | - Marissa A Feldman
- Child Development and Rehabilitation Center, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
| | - Meredyth A Evans
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - Jill Weissberg-Benchell
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quality of life in pediatric oncology patients, caregivers and siblings after psychosocial screening: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:3659-3668. [PMID: 31811485 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05160-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether conducting psychosocial screening using a validated measure (the Psychosocial Assessment Tool, PAT) and providing a summary of PAT results to the patient's treating team improves quality of life (QOL) in newly diagnosed patients with cancer, their caregivers and siblings, in general, and in relation to the initial family psychosocial risk. METHODS Families were randomly allocated to an intervention (IG, treating team received PAT summary describing low, medium, or high psychosocial risk) or control group (CG, no summary provided to treating team) in two Canadian pediatric cancer centers. Caregivers (N = 122) of children newly diagnosed with cancer, patients (n = 36), and siblings (n = 25) completed QOL assessments at 2-4 weeks (T1) and 6 months post-diagnosis (T2). Caregivers also completed PAT and proxy QOL for patient and sibling. RESULTS In general, patient-proxy total QOL improved in IG compared to CG over time but only for high psychosocial risk patients (p < .05). Patient proxy cancer-related QOL improved over time regardless of group allocation; caregiver QOL also improved over time (ps < .05). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the benefits of psychosocial screening results only on proxy patient QOL outcomes with high psychosocial risk near diagnosis. Evaluating QOL benefits in pediatric oncology patients is critical for establishing the clinical value of psychosocial screening. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02788604 (REGISTERED WITH HTTPS://CLINICALTRIALS.GOV/CT2/SHOW/NCT02788604 ).
Collapse
|
10
|
Healthcare provider utility ratings of a psychosocial screening summary: from diagnosis to 6 months. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:1717-1723. [PMID: 31292754 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04969-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychosocial screening has been proposed as a core standard of care in pediatric oncology. However, there has been limited application of this standard thus far. Understanding healthcare provider (HCP) attitudes towards psychosocial screening is an important element towards furthering implementation initiatives of standard screening practices in pediatric oncology. OBJECTIVE To compare HCP perceptions of the utility of a psychosocial risk summary by discipline (oncologist, nurse, social worker), risk level (Universal, Targeted, Clinical) derived from the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), and time (shortly after a child's diagnosis [T1] and 6 months later [T2]). METHOD All participating HCPs (oncologists, nurses, social workers) were asked to rate how useful they found the psychosocial risk summary using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS The psychosocial risk summary was perceived as equally useful across providers (oncologists, nurses, social workers) and PAT risk levels at T1. At T2, the psychosocial risk summary was perceived as more useful by oncologists and nurses than social workers, and summaries indicating elevated risk were perceived as more useful than those indicating low risk. Overall, healthcare providers reported greater utility of psychosocial risk summary near diagnosis compared with 6 months later, largely driven by lower utility ratings reported by social workers at T2. CONCLUSION Understanding perceived utility and factors affecting perceived utility is a key component to designing effective implementation strategies for systematic psychosocial screening. Active engagement of HCPs in the screening process is critical in improving implementation of psychosocial screening throughout pediatric cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pai ALH, Swain AM, Chen FF, Hwang WT, Vega G, Carlson O, Ortiz FA, Canter K, Joffe N, Kolb EA, Davies SM, Chewning JH, Deatrick J, Kazak AE. Screening for Family Psychosocial Risk in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with the Psychosocial Assessment Tool. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:1374-1381. [PMID: 30878608 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Family psychosocial risk screening is an important initial step in delivering evidence-based care in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Establishing an evidence-based screening approach that is acceptable, reliable, and valid is an essential step in psychosocial care delivery. This is a 3-institution multimethod study. In part 1, caregivers of children about to undergo HCT (n = 140) completed the Psychosocial Assessment Tool-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (PAT-HCT), a brief parent report screener adapted for HCT, and validating questionnaires. Families received feedback on their risks identified on the PAT-HCT. In part 2, 12 caregivers completed a semistructured interview about their perceptions of the PAT and the feedback process. The reliability and validity of the PAT-HCT total and subscale scores were tested using Kuder-Richardson-20 (KR-20) and Pearson correlations. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative interview data. Internal consistency for the total score (KR-20 = .88) and the Child Problems, Sibling Problems, Family Problems, and Stress Reactions subscales were strong (KR-20 >.70). Family Structure, Social Support, and Family Beliefs subscales were adequate (KR-20 = .55 to .63). Moderate to strong correlations with the criteria measures provided validation for the total and subscale scores. Feedback was provided to 97.14% of the families who completed the PAT-HCT, and the mean rating of acceptability was >4.00 (on a 5-point scale). The qualitative data indicate that families appreciate the effort to provide screening and feedback. The PAT-HCT is a psychometrically sound screener for use in HCT. Feedback can be given to families. Both the screener and the feedback process are acceptable to caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahna L H Pai
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
| | - Avi Madan Swain
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Children's of Alabama; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Fang Fang Chen
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System; Sidney Kimmel Medical School at Thomas Jefferson University
| | - Wei-Ting Hwang
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Gabriela Vega
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System
| | - Olivia Carlson
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System
| | | | - Kimberly Canter
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System; Sidney Kimmel Medical School at Thomas Jefferson University
| | - Naomi Joffe
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
| | - E Anders Kolb
- Sidney Kimmel Medical School at Thomas Jefferson University; Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Nemours Children's Health System
| | - Stella M Davies
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital
| | - Joseph H Chewning
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Children's of Alabama; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Janet Deatrick
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
| | - Anne E Kazak
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System; Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical School at Thomas Jefferson University.
| |
Collapse
|