Exploratory analyses of the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT): a randomized trial of early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus standard care in advanced cancer patients

The benefits of early palliative care on psychological well-being, functional status, and health-related quality of life among cancer patients and their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer and their caregivers experience significant psychological, physical, and emotional burdens throughout the disease trajectory which reduces their quality of life (QoL). Early palliative care (EPC) has been proposed as a strategy to alleviate physical, psychological and emotional burdens and improve health outcomes. While evidence generally supports the benefits of EPC, variations in reported outcomes highlight the need for a deeper understanding of its impact across different patient populations and healthcare settings.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the pooled effects of EPC on psychological, functional status, and QoL outcomes in both cancer patients and their caregivers. The secondary aim was to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients and their family caregivers.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Four databases, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane, were searched up to January 2024. This study included randomized controlled trial (RCT) and pilot-RCT studies reporting psychological outcomes (anxiety, depression), functional status, QoL, and satisfaction in cancer patients and their caregivers. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the short-term (< 24 weeks) versus long-term (≥ 24 weeks) effects of EPC. Mean differences (MD) and standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated using a fixed-effects model according to the Mantel-Haenszel model and a random-effects model according to the DerSimonian and Laird method.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies met our inclusion criteria. For cancer patients, EPC significantly reduced anxiety (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.02; -0.23, p = 0.002) and improved QoL (SMD 0.13, 95%CI: 0.06; 0.19, p = 0.0004). However, there was no significant reduction in depression (SMD -0.15, 95% CI: -0.36; 0.05, p = 0.14) and improvement in functional status (MD = 2.14, 95% CI: -0.78; 5.06, p = 0.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that long-term EPC significantly reduced anxiety and depression while improving QoL, but had no significant effects on functional status. For caregivers, EPC did not significantly impact either physical or mental QoL (Short form/SF-36 physical: MD = 0.81, 95% CI: -0.46; 2.09, p = 0.21; SF-36 Mental: MD = 0.53, 95% CI: -1.03; 2.08, p = 0.51). Moreover, satisfaction was more likely to be higher in patients and their caregivers who received EPC than in those who received usual care (MD 2.45, 95% CI: 0.90; 4.01, p = 0.002, MD 4.09, 95% CI: 0.60; 7.58, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

EPC reduces long term psychological burden and improve QoL and care satisfaction experience among patients with cancer. Therefore, EPC should be more broadly introduced into cancer care earlier to address patient's psychological burdens.

Promising results of a resource- and activity-oriented intervention integrating rehabilitation into palliative care in people with advanced cancer: A feasibility study testing outcome measures

OBJECTIVES

People with advanced cancer express the need for support to balance everyday activities to experience quality of life. The Balance, Activity and Quality of Life Intervention was developed to address this need using a resource- and activity-oriented approach that integrates rehabilitation into palliative care. To inform a future full-scale evaluation, the objective of this feasibility study was to test if the selected outcome measures of health-related quality of life, including physical function and fatigue, and occupational balance could capture any possible changes of the Balance, Activity and Quality of Life Intervention in people with advanced cancer.

METHODS

Repeated-measurement feasibility study without a control group (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04772690). Twenty-two home-living adults with advanced cancer participated in the study. The intervention was delivered at the research clinic of REPHA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care. Data regarding health-related quality of life, including physical function and fatigue, and occupational balance were collected with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 and the Occupational Balance Questionnaire at baseline, after a 5-day intervention stay and at 6- and 12-week follow-up.

RESULTS

The outcome measure of health-related quality of life captured a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.0046) after the 5-day intervention stay, with 64% of the participants experiencing clinically relevant improvements. No other statistically significant changes were found. Missing data were minor.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Health-related quality of life is a promising outcome measure to capture the possible changes of the Balance, Activity and Quality of Life Intervention. The results indicate that a resource- and activity-oriented approach may be helpful when integrating rehabilitation into palliative care.

Supportive care interventions in metastatic bone disease: scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patients with secondary metastatic involvement of the musculoskeletal system due to primary cancers are a rapidly growing population with significant risks for health-related end-of-life morbidities. In particular, bone metastases or metastatic bone disease (MBD) imparts significant adversity to remaining quality of life. No rigorous review of clinical trials on the use of supportive care interventions for MBD has been conducted. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics of supportive care interventions for MBD and critically appraise study designs, key findings, and quality of evidence of the research.

METHODS

We searched for published clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in PubMED, CINAHL and Google Scholar for articles published between September 2017 and September 2022. Some examples of Medical Subject Headings terms were: 'secondary neoplasm', 'metastatic bone disease', 'palliative care' and 'supportive care intervention'. Quality of published evidence was evaluated based on treatment types and study design.

RESULTS

After reviewing 572 publications, 13 articles were included in the final review and evaluation including seven clinical trials, two trial protocols and four systematic reviews. Feasible interventions included enhanced palliative care consultation, palliative radiotherapy and alternative medicines. Interventions addressed primary endpoints of fatigue (N=4, 31%), pain (N=3, 23%) or cancer-related symptoms (N=3, 23%) with patient-reported outcome instruments. No interventions reported on fracture complications or endpoints, specifically. The quality of most studies was moderate to strong.

CONCLUSION

Supportive care interventions for MBD are feasible and the impact is measurable via patient-reported outcome measures. While the evidence for interventions was moderate to strong, there are very few specific controlled trials for skeletal-related events and impacts of social determinants of health. Further clinical trials are needed to define supportive care interventions for MBD that demonstrate reduced risk of fracture and that mitigate the reduced quality of life when negative musculoskeletal outcomes arise.

Palliative Care in the Ageing European Population: A Cross-Country Comparison

With Europe's ageing population and rising demand for palliative care, it is crucial to examine the use of palliative care among older adults during their last years of life and understand the factors influencing their access and end-of-life circumstances. This study employed a cohort of SHARE participants aged 65 years or older who had passed away between Wave 6 (2015) and Wave 7 (2017). Information on death circumstances, palliative care utilization, and associated variables were analysed. The study revealed that nearly 13.0% of individuals across these countries died under palliative care, with Slovenia having the lowest rate (0.3%) and France the highest (30.4%). Palliative care utilization in the last 30 days before death was observed in over 24.0% of participants, with the Czech Republic having the lowest rate (5.0%) and Greece the highest (48.8%). A higher risk of using or dying in palliative care was significantly associated with cognitive impairment (low verbal fluency), physical inactivity, and good to excellent self-perceived health. This work highlights the urgent need for enhanced global access to palliative care and advocates for the cross-country comparison of effective practices within Europe, tailored to the unique healthcare needs of older adults.

Meta-Analysis of Effects of Early Palliative Care on Health-Related Outcomes Among Advanced Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Early palliative care (PC) has received more attention for improving health-related outcomes for advanced cancer patients in recent years, but the results of previous studies are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to use meta-analysis and trial sequence analysis to evaluate the effect of early PC on health-related outcomes of advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

All English publications were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2023, with a restriction that the study type was a randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

The results showed that early PC positively affected quality of life, satisfaction with care, and symptom burden reduction. However, early PC had no significant effect on anxiety or survival. Trial sequence analysis results showed that the effect of early PC on the quality of life was stable.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review suggested that early PC could positively affect health-related outcomes for advanced cancer patients. Early PC can be used widely in clinical settings to improve health-related outcomes of advanced cancer. However, because of the trial sequence analysis results, further well-designed, clinical, randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

Facilitators and Barriers for Initiating Conversations About End of Life

Background

Conducting a conversation about wishes for treatment at end of life (EOL) has been shown to improve EOL care for patients and relatives. Still, only a minority of physicians conduct the conversation, which might lead to unwanted interventions and treatments.

Objectives

The purpose of this survey was to examine which factors facilitate and hinder physicians across a wide range of health care facilities to initiate the conversation about wishes for treatment at EOL.

Design

A questionnaire survey based on a Delphi-developed questionnaire.

Setting/Subjects

The questionnaire was sent to both hospital physicians and general practitioners (GPs) in a Danish region.

Results

More than 3000 physicians were invited to participate in the survey. Of these, 782 responded, 622 working at a hospital department, and 160 from general practice clinics. Results showed that senior physicians, GPs, and physicians working in a medical department feel best equipped to conduct the conversation. Moreover, senior physicians pointed to their experience as physicians as being of great importance for conducting the conversation, whereas junior physicians found training in conducting the conversation as an important factor.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that different factors depending on the health care setting and the seniority of the physician facilitate or hinder physicians from conducting the conversation about wishes for treatment at EOL. Being aware of these differences and making a concerted effort depending on setting and seniority might help implement and conduct the conversation.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and palliative-care clinician reported outcomes (ClinROs) mutually improve pain and other symptoms assessment of hospitalized cancer-patients

OBJECTIVES

Patients with malignant diseases are known to have a high symptom burden including pain, and insufficient treatment of pain in this population has been frequently documented. To promote the integration of specialized palliative care and hematology and oncology, this study investigated disease, treatment, and comorbidity related symptoms as well as functional capacity and health-related quality of life (HQoL) by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinician-reported outcome measures (ClinROs) among inpatients in a comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out in a large comprehensive cancer centre of both oncological and hematological inpatients. It combined the use of PROMs and ClinROs.

RESULTS

A high symptom burden was reported with fatigue and appetite loss as the most frequent symptoms, and role function being the most impaired function. Further, a low HQoL score was associated with a high number of symptoms/impairments. More than half of all patients reported pain in the last 24 h. Out of 95 patients with average pain >0 in the last 24 h, 71% were treated with opioids and 24% were treated with adjuvant analgesic (AA) defined as antiepileptics, antidepressants and prednisolone. Out of 57 patients with average pain >0 in the last 24 h and possible neuropathic pain, 33% were treated with AAs. A high odds ratio for moderate/severe pain in patients with possible neuropathic pain mechanisms was observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This study did not only emphasize the need for systematic use of PROMs to identify symptoms and needs for inpatients, but also displayed why PROMs supported by ClinROs are a prerequisite to deliver truly individualized and high-quality patient-centered care. This study calls for continuous training of health care professionals to deliver high-quality treatment of pain. Further, it contributes to the growing recognition, that palliative care and standard care must be integrated to strengthen patient-centered care.

Use of Theoretical Frameworks in the Development and Testing of Palliative Care Interventions

CONTEXT

Palliative care (PC) research has grown over the last 20 years. Yet, the causal components and pathways of PC interventions remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To document the prevalence and application of theoretical frameworks in developing and testing PC interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of previously published systematic reviews of PC randomized clinical trials. Trials were evaluated for explicit mention of a theoretical framework, process or delivery model, or clinical practice guideline that supported the development of the intervention. We used a structured data extraction form to document study population, outcomes, and whether and how authors used a theoretical framework, process/delivery model, or clinical practice guideline. We applied an adapted coding scheme to evaluate use of theoretical frameworks.

RESULTS

We reviewed 85 PC trials conducted between 1984 and 2021. Thirty-eight percent (n = 32) of trials explicitly mentioned a theoretical framework, process or delivery model, or clinical practice guideline as a foundation for the intervention design. Only nine trials included a theoretical framework, while the remaining 23 cited a process/delivery model or clinical practice guideline.

CONCLUSION

Most PC trials do not cite a theoretical foundation for their intervention design. Future work should focus on developing and validating new theoretical frameworks and modifying existing theories and models to better explain the mechanisms of the variety of PC interventions.

The quality of end of life care for Danish cancer patients who have received specialized palliative: a national survey using the Danish version of VOICES-SF

BACKGROUND

National recommendations state that Danish patients with complex palliative needs should have access to specialized palliative care but little is known about the perceived quality of this care or end of life care in general.

AIM

To assess how end of life care was evaluated by the bereaved spouses and to investigate whether the perceived quality was associated with (1) quantity of specialized palliative care provided, (2) place of death, and (3) emotional state when completing the questionnaire.

DESIGN

The bereaved spouses of 1584 cancer patients who had received specialized palliative care were invited to answer the Views Of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services - Short Form (VOICES-SF) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) approximately 3-9 months after the patient's death.

RESULTS

A total of 787 (50%) of the invited spouses participated. In the last 3 months of the patient's life, the quality of all services taken together was rated as good, excellent, or outstanding in 83% of the cases and it was significantly associated with place of death (p = 0.0051, fewest considered it "fair" or "poor" if the patient died at home). In total, 93% reported that the patient died at the right place although only 74% died at the patient's preferred place. Higher levels of anxiety (p = 0.01) but not depression at the time of questionnaire completion was associated with lower satisfaction with the overall quality of care.

CONCLUSION

The quality of care was rated very highly by bereaved spouses of patients receiving specialized palliative care.

Current Guidelines for Integration of Palliative Care in Oncology

Multiple cancer societies and professional medical organizations recommend integration of palliative care into routine oncology care. A growing body of literature supports the benefits of palliative care in patients with cancer. Palliative care improves pain and other symptoms, enhances quality of life, and reduces depression. The best method and timing for integration of palliative care is unclear. Multiple barriers exist that prevent optimal palliative care integration; these barriers will require additional education and research to overcome.

Effects of an Interprofessional Communication Approach on Support Needs, Quality of Life, and Mood of Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial

Background

To address the support needs of newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer with limited prognosis, the Milestone Communication Approach (MCA) was developed and implemented. The main elements of the MCA are situation‐specific conversations along the disease trajectory conducted by an interprofessional tandem of physician and nurse. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of MCA on addressing support needs, quality of life, and mood as compared with standard oncological care.

Patients and Methods

A randomized trial was conducted with baseline assessment and follow‐up assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months in outpatients with newly diagnosed lung cancer stage IV at a German thoracic oncology hospital. The primary outcome was the Health System and Information Needs subscale of the Short Form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS‐SF34‐G) at 3‐month follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included the other subscales of the SCNS‐SF34‐G, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy lung module, the Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety, and the Distress Thermometer.

Results

At baseline, 174 patients were randomized, of whom 102 patients (MCA: n = 52; standard care: n = 50) provided data at 3‐month follow‐up. Patients of the MCA group reported lower information needs at 3‐month follow‐up (mean ± SD, 33.4 ± 27.5; standard care, 43.1 ± 29.9; p = .033). No effects were found for secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

MCA lowered patient‐reported information needs but did not have other effects. MCA contributed to tailored communication because an adequate level of information and orientation set the basis for patient‐centered care.

Implications for Practice

By addressing relevant issues at predefined times, the Milestone Communication Approach provides individual patient‐centered care facilitating the timely integration of palliative care for patients with a limited prognosis. The needs of patients with lung cancer must be assessed and addressed throughout the disease trajectory. Although specific topics may be relevant for all patients, such as information about the disease and associated health care, situations of individual patients and their families must be considered. Additionally, using the short form of the Supportive Care Needs Survey in clinical practice to identify patients’ problems might support individually targeted communication and preference‐sensitive care.

Addressing patient information needs in a timely fashion is of paramount importance for preference‐sensitive decisions and patient‐centered care. This article evaluates the Milestone Communication Approach to oncological care.

Effect of continual quality improvement of palliative care consultation teams by iterative, customer satisfaction survey-driven evaluation

Background

Current consensus recognizes the benefits of early intervention in palliative care consultation teams (PCCTs). As consultants, we should now attempt to improve the quality of our teams by utilizing a method mainly used in the business field. We aimed to investigate the effects of iterative evaluation of customer satisfaction surveys, filled by physicians and ward nurses in this study, for quality improvement of PCCTs.

Methods

In October 2019, the participants filled the first questionnaire survey about palliative care and PCCTs at a 678-bed hospital, and improvement areas were uncovered. Refinements were planned and implemented, and then reevaluated using the second questionnaire survey in March 2020.

Results

In addition to the characteristics of our clients evaluated from approximately 500 valid responses, the first survey showed that the response rate of the questionnaire, knowledge of palliative care and PCCTs, and publicity of the PCCT were recognized as issues needing attention. We planned to contrive ways to collect questionnaires, hold monthly workshops for palliative care, launch newsletters of palliative care, and go on client rounds. The second survey revealed improvements in the physicians’ response rate (p = 0.02), the accuracy rate of application of PCCTs in Japan (p < 0.01), and ward nurses’ confidence in opioid use (p = 0.04) and tendency toward easier accessibility to the PCCT (p = 0.07).

Conclusion

Continual quality improvements through iterative, customer satisfaction survey-driven evaluation are a widely established practice in the business field. By using this appropriately, we could enable PCCTs to improve their quality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00741-2.

Nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialised palliative care intervention programme for patients with advanced lung cancer: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

It has been suggested that palliative care integrated into standard cancer treatment from the early phase of the disease can improve the quality of life of patients with cancer. In this paper, we present the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialised palliative care intervention programme for patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A total of 206 patients will be randomised (1:1) to the intervention group or the control group (usual care). The intervention, triggered with a brief self-administered screening tool, comprises comprehensive need assessments, counselling and service coordination by advanced-level nurses. The primary outcome is the Trial Outcome Index of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes include participants' quality of life (FACT-Lung), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), illness perception (Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire), medical service use and survival. A mixed-method approach is expected to provide an insight about how this intervention works.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center Japan (approval number: 2016-235). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations and will be reflected on to the national healthcare policy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000025491.

How Effective Is Palliative Care in Improving Patient Outcomes?

OPINION STATEMENT

As palliative care (PC) continues its rapid growth, an emerging body of evidence is demonstrating that its approach of interdisciplinary supportive care benefits many patient populations, including in the oncology setting. As studies and data proliferate, however, questions persist about who, what, why, when, and how PC as well as the ideal time for a PC consult and length of involvement. When comparing outcomes from chemotherapy trials, it is important to consider the dosing regimens used in the various studies. In the same way, it is important to account for the "dose" of the PC interventions utilized across studies, and apples to apples comparisons are needed in order to draw accurate conclusions about PC's benefits. Studies which include a true interdisciplinary PC intervention consistently show improvements in patient quality of life, as well as cost savings, with further study needed for other outcomes. These benefits cannot be extrapolated to care which may be labeled "palliative care," but which does not meet the standard of true interdisciplinary PC. The ultimate question is: Does PC indeed improve outcomes?