Inclusion of children in the initial conversation about their cancer diagnosis: impact on parent experiences of the communication process

Practical considerations for prognostic communication in pediatric cancer

High-quality communication is essential for the optimal care of children with cancer and their families. There are opportunities for pediatric oncologists to engage in clear and compassionate prognostic communication across the disease trajectory including at the time of diagnosis, disease recurrence or progression, and end of life. Contrary to previously held beliefs, prognostic disclosure supports parental hope and meets the needs and expectations of families who prefer honest conversations about prognosis. These communication encounters can be challenging with many oncologists having little training in this important skill. In this summary, we aim to provide practical guidance for prognostic communication in pediatric cancer across the illness trajectory giving phrases we have found helpful including a brief overview of some published communication frameworks utilized in the care of pediatric oncology patients and families.

Prognosis Communication in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

While communication plays an important role in medicine, it also often represents a challenge when the topic at hand is the prognosis of a high-risk condition. When it comes to pediatric oncology, the challenge becomes even greater for physicians who have to adapt their discourse to both the child and their family.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, an advanced search on PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library was performed, from 1 January 2017 to 31 October 2022. Demographic data for caregivers, pediatric patients and physicians were extracted, as well as diagnosis, prognosis, presence at discussion, emotional states and impact on life, trust, decision roles, communication quality and other outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles were analyzed. Most studies (17) focused on caregivers, while only seven and five studies were focused on children and physicians, respectively. Most parents reported high trust in their physicians (73.01%), taking the leading role in decision making (48%), moderate distress levels (46.68%), a strong desire for more information (78.64%), receiving high-quality information (56.71%) and communication (52.73%). Most children were not present at discussions (63.98%); however, their desire to know more was expressed in three studies. Moreover, only two studies observed children being involved in decision making. Most physicians had less than 20 years of experience (55.02%) and reported the use of both words and statistics (47.3%) as a communication method.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication research is focused more on caregivers, yet children may understand more than they seem capable of and want to be included in the conversation. More studies should focus on and quantify the opinions of children and their physicians. In order to improve the quality of communication, healthcare workers should receive professional training.

The New Oncologic Diagnosis Discussion: Perspectives of Pediatric Oncologists

PURPOSE

We aimed to understand how new diagnosis discussions are conducted in pediatric oncology, and the training provided for their conduct.

METHODS

This mixed-methods study used a sequential exploratory design. Qualitative interviews (n = 20) were conducted with pediatric oncologists (n = 15) and fellows (n = 5) at a single institution, focusing on the process used to convey the diagnosis and treatment plan to the family. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited pediatric oncology fellowship program directors (n = 38) and fellows (n = 70) were subsequently surveyed to confirm qualitative results and elucidate the training that fellows receive in conducting new diagnosis discussions.

RESULTS

Our findings suggest that new diagnosis discussions in pediatric oncology are typically conducted in three stages: (1) concern for cancer; (2) confirmation of diagnosis; and (3) treatment plan/consent, and are fundamentally similar across settings; however, pediatric oncologists skillfully tailor their approach on the basis of clinical circumstances and parental needs. Decisions regarding inclusion of the child are primarily determined by parental preference, whereas inclusion of health care team members is driven by physician role (ie, trainee v program director) and health care organization-related factors. Physician preparation for discussions involves logistical, intellectual, and emotional components. Disclosure of prognosis is nuanced. There is variability across pediatric oncology fellowship programs in the provision of training for these discussions.

CONCLUSION

We identified common practices of pediatric oncologists as they prepare for and lead new diagnosis discussions in pediatric oncology. We found variability in the training that pediatric oncology fellows receive regarding how to conduct these discussions, highlighting a need for standardized training curricula.

Parental Perspectives on Life-Altering News in Emergency Settings: A Qualitative Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Delivering life-altering news is a difficult task that is frequently the responsibility of emergency physicians. However, the existing frameworks for guiding such interactions fail to address the physician-parent-patient dynamic of pediatric emergency encounters. To date, no study has investigated the parental perspective, limiting the ability to provide evidence-based recommendations. This study describes how parents experience receiving life-altering news about their child in emergency settings.

METHODS

This qualitative study used virtual asynchronous focus groups. Through purposeful sampling of virtual support and advocacy groups, we recruited parents of children diagnosed with either malignancy or type 1 diabetes in an emergency department. Participants were then assigned to private Facebook groups established solely for this study. Questions were posted to these groups over the course of 5 days. At their convenience, participants could post responses, replies, or new questions. Three members of the research team performed thematic analysis and used team consensus to ensure validity.

RESULTS

Four focus groups were conducted with a total of 28 participants. Parents described their experiences receiving life-altering news as a process with 4 primary emergent themes: lens through which they view the experience, the ED encounter, the immediate response, and the long-term impact. Each parent entered into the ED encounter with a unique collection of personal experiences, circumstances, and knowledge. These factors shaped the lens through which they perceived the events of the ED encounter. Ultimately, this determined participants' response to the life-altering news, leading to many long-term impacts on the various dynamics within each parent's life.

CONCLUSIONS

The words used to disclose life-altering news are only a small piece of the experience for parents. Personal lenses changed how encounters were perceived, resulting in variable and long-lasting implications. We recommend the following framework for providers: understand the lens, control encounters, manage responses, and respect long-term impacts.

Adolescent Experience With Parental Cancer and Involvement With Medical Professionals: A Heuristic Phenomenological Inquiry

Experiencing the death of a loved one can be a difficult occurrence. Adolescents, in particular, experience death in a unique way. Yet there is relatively little research on adolescents’ experience with parental death and their involvement in the medical setting during a parent’s terminal illness. This qualitative study utilized heuristic inquiry, a type of phenomenological research, to investigate adolescents’ involvement in the hospital setting during parental terminal illness. Qualitative analysis of participants’ experiences resulted in two primary categories associated with adolescents’ involvement with medical professionals during parental illness: factors influencing hospital involvement and experience with health care professionals. The findings have implications for medical and mental health professionals who work with adolescent family members of terminally ill patients.