Effect of an electronic quality checklist on prescription patterns of prophylactic antiemetic and pain flare medications in the context of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases

Framework Development: Standardizing Definition of Advanced Practice Radiation Therapy Activities for Clinical Workload Quantification

Purpose

Advanced practice (AP) in radiation therapy (RT) is being implemented around the globe. In an effort to advance the understanding of the similarities and differences in APRT roles in Ontario, Canada, a community of practice (CoP) sought ways to provide quantitative data on the nature of APRT clinical activities and the frequency with which these activities were being executed.

Methods

In 2017, a consensus building project involving 20 APRTs and 14 radiation therapy (RT) department managers in Ontario was completed to establish a mechanism to quantify APRTs' clinical impact. In Round 1 & 2, expert feedback was gathered to generate an Advanced Practice (AP) Activity List. In Round 3: 20 APRTs completed an online survey to assess the importance and applicability of each AP Activity to their role using Likert scale (0-5). A final AP Activity List & Definitions was generated.

Results & discussion

Round 1: Forty-seven AP activities were identified. Round 2: 3/14 RT managers provided 145 feedback statements on Round 1 AP Activity List. The working group used RT managers' feedback to clarify AP activities and definitions, specifically merging 33 unique AP activities to create 11 inclusive AP activities and eliminating 8 activities identified from Round 1. The most inclusive AP activity created was #1 New Patient Consultation, this AP Activity is merged from 7 unique AP activities. Incorporating RT managers' feedback with the internal AP clinical workload lists from 2 Ontario cancer centres resulted in a revised AP Activity List with 20 AP inclusive activities. Round 3: 14/20 APRTs provided Likert scores on this revised list. The most applicable AP activities (mean score) were #16 Technical Consultation (4.0), #15 Contouring Target Volume (3.8) and #2 Planning Consultation (3.8); the least applicable was #18 MR Applicator Assessment (0.9).

Conclusions

This is the first systematic attempt to build consensus on AP clinical activities. Non-clinical APRT activities related to research, education, innovation, and program development were not in the scope of this project. The Final AP Activity List & Definitions serves as a framework that allows standardized and continuous monitoring of AP clinical activities and impact.

Pharmacologic Pain Management: What Radiation Oncologists Should Know

Individuals with cancer experience a host of symptoms, especially when the malignancy is advanced. Pain occurs from the cancer itself or related treatments. Undertreated pain contributes to patient suffering and lack of engagement in cancer-directed therapies. Adequate pain management includes thorough assessment; treatment by radiotherapists or anesthesia pain specialists; anti-inflammatory medications, oral or intravenous opioid analgesics, and topical agents; and attention to the emotional and functional effects of pain, which may involve social workers, psychologists, speech therapists, nutritionists, physiatrists and palliative medicine providers. This review discusses typical pain syndromes arising in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and provides concrete recommendations for pain assessment and pharmacologic treatment.

A Canadian experience of palliative advanced practice radiation therapy TIPS: Training, implementation, practice and sustainability

The concept of the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist (APRT) was created in 2004, in response to pressures on the radiation treatment sector in Ontario. This led to development, piloting and integration of the Clinical Specialist Radiation Therapist (CSRT) into Ontario's cancer care framework. A national certification process, competency profile and protected title of APRT(T) were established in 2017, under the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists (CAMRT), in collaboration with Cancer Care Ontario/Ontario Health. This report describes the approach to development, validation and measuring impact of the CSRT role in Ontario, specifically in palliative care (pCSRT). It also presents information to assist jurisdictions interested in developing a pCSRT position, describing competency development, assessment, and assumption of practice, and providing some keys to success. This is foundational for consistent expansion of the pCSRT role to other regions to continue to increase system capacity while improving the quality of cancer care.