1
|
Sun V, Thomson CA, Crane TE, Arnold KB, Guthrie KA, Freylersythe SG, Braun-Inglis C, Jones L, Carmichael JC, Messick C, Flaherty D, Ambrale S, Cohen SA, Krouse RS. Baseline characteristics and recruitment for SWOG S1820: altering intake, managing bowel symptoms in survivors of rectal cancer (AIMS-RC). Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:371. [PMID: 38775966 PMCID: PMC11111552 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08527-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many survivors of rectal cancer experience persistent bowel dysfunction. There are few evidence-based symptom management interventions to improve bowel control. The purpose of this study is to describe recruitment and pre-randomization baseline sociodemographic, health status, and clinical characteristics for SWOG S1820, a trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Symptoms in Rectal Cancer (AIMS-RC) intervention. METHODS SWOG S1820 aimed to determine the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of AIMS-RC, a symptom management intervention for bowel health, comparing intervention to attention control. Survivors with a history of cancers of the rectosigmoid colon or rectum, within 6-24 months of primary treatment completion, with a post-surgical permanent ostomy or anastomosis, and over 18 years of age were enrolled. Outcomes included total bowel function, low anterior resection syndrome, quality of life, motivation for managing bowel health, self-efficacy for managing symptoms, positive and negative affect, and study feasibility and acceptability. RESULTS The trial completed accrual over a 29-month period and enrolled 117 participants from 34 institutions across 17 states and one US Pacific territory. At baseline, most enrolled participants reported self-imposed diet adjustments after surgery, persistent dietary intolerances, and bowel discomfort post-treatment, with high levels of constipation and diarrhea (grades 1-4). CONCLUSIONS SWOG S1820 was able to recruit, in a timely manner, a study cohort that is demographically representative of US survivors of rectal cancer. Baseline characteristics illustrate the connection between diet/eating and bowel symptoms post-treatment, with many participants reporting diet adjustments and persistent inability to be comfortable with dietary intake. CLINICALTRIALS GOV REGISTRATION DATE 12/19/2019. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT#04205955.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Sciences and Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| | | | - Tracy E Crane
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kathryn B Arnold
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katherine A Guthrie
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah G Freylersythe
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Lee Jones
- Research Advocate, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Joseph C Carmichael
- Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Craig Messick
- Department of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Devin Flaherty
- ValleyHealth/Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, VA, USA
| | - Samir Ambrale
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
- FHP Health Center, Guam, USA
| | - Stacey A Cohen
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert S Krouse
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rocha HB, Carneiro BC, Vasconcelos PA, Pereira R, Quinta-Gomes AL, Nobre PJ. Promoting Sexual Health in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Survivors: Results from a Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:253. [PMID: 38275533 PMCID: PMC10815307 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment negatively impact sexual health. However, there is still a lack of interventions targeting the sexual healthcare needs of colorectal cancer patients and survivors. This systematic review aimed to identify and summarize the efficacy of available psychological interventions aimed at improving colorectal cancer patients' and survivors' sexual health. METHODS This review followed PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. A database search was conducted for studies published until July 2023 on EBSCO Host, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Manuscripts were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. RESULTS From the 1499 records screened, four studies describing psychological interventions to improve the sexual health of the target population were identified. All studies reported on e-health programs and showed evidence of their efficacy in the improvement of participants' sexual function. The studies presented low scores on the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. CONCLUSIONS Despite the evidence that tele/e-health psychological interventions have the potential to effectively promote sexual health in colorectal cancer patients and survivors, more robust research is needed to allow for generalization. Future research should further assess the efficacy of e-health interventions (eMental Health) in promoting sexual health in patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
|
3
|
Dressler J, Njor SH, Jørgensen LN, Rasmussen M. Less Invasive Primary Treatment for Colorectal Cancer After Implementation of National Screening: A Nationwide Cohort Study. World J Surg 2023; 47:2877-2887. [PMID: 37610467 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07142-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening on type of primary treatment remains sparsely investigated. This study evaluated the difference in primary treatment strategy between patients diagnosed with screen-detected (SD-CRC) and non-screen-detected colorectal cancer (NSD-CRC) in a national CRC screening program. METHODS This was a retrospective national register-based cohort study. Data on patients aged between 50 and 75 years and diagnosed with SD-CRC or NSD-CRC were retrieved from the national colorectal cancer screening database and the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Outcomes related to surgical invasiveness were compared between the two cohorts. Differences were expressed as relative risks using log-binomial generalized linear regression models. UICC stage IV specific outcomes were analyzed using the same method. All analyses were adjusted for sex, age, type of cancer (colonic/rectal), and Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS The study included 4707 patients with SD-CRC and 7328 with NSD-CRC. Therapeutic flexible endoscopy (SD-CRC: n = 636 vs. NSD-CRC: n = 334, RR: 2.50, P < 0.001), (robotic-assisted) laparoscopic resection ((n = 616 vs. n = 773, RR: 1.27, P < 0.001), n = 2759 vs. n = 3471, RR: 1.11, P < 0.001), and radical resection (n = 3890 vs. n = 4834, RR: 1.02, P = 0.002) were significantly more frequent in the SD-CRC group. The rates of emergency priority (n = 32 vs. n = 562, RR: 0.09, P < 0.001), open surgery (n = 391 vs. n = 1410, RR: 0.53, P < 0.001), supplementary organ resection (n = 259 vs. n = 860, RR: 0.56, P < 0.001), and stoma formation (n = 526 vs. n = 1040, RR: 0.89, P = 0.007) were significantly lower in the SD-CRC group. The rate of patients undergoing surgery with UICC stage IV disease was significantly higher in the SD-CRC group (SD-CRC: n = 262, NSD-CRC: n = 994, RR: 1.43, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION SD-CRC remained associated with less invasive primary surgical treatment following adjustment for potential healthy user bias. UICC stage IV disease may be less advanced in patients with SD-CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannie Dressler
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 11, Entrance 8, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
| | - Sisse H Njor
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars N Jørgensen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 11, Entrance 8, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Rasmussen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 11, Entrance 8, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rutherford C, Kim B, White K, Ostroff C, Acret L, Tracy M, Mahadeva J, Willcock SM. Experiences of colorectal cancer survivors in returning to primary coordinated healthcare following treatment. Aust J Prim Health 2023; 29:463-470. [PMID: 36872459 DOI: 10.1071/py22201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in screening and treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) have improved survival rates, leading to a large population of CRC survivors. Treatment for CRC can cause long-term side-effects and functioning impairments. General practitioners (GPs) have a role in meeting survivorship care needs of this group of survivors. We explored CRC survivors' experiences of managing the consequences of treatment in the community and their perspective on the GP's role in post-treatment care. METHODS This was a qualitative study using an interpretive descriptive approach. Adult participants no longer actively receiving treatment for CRC were asked about: side-effects post-treatment; experiences of GP-coordinated care; perceived care gaps; and perceived GP role in post-treatment care. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS A total of 19 interviews were conducted. Participants experienced side-effects that significantly impacted their lives; many they felt ill-prepared for. Disappointment and frustration was expressed with the healthcare system when expectations about preparation for post-treatment effects were not met. The GP was considered vital in survivorship care. Participants' unmet needs led to self-management, self-directed information seeking and sourcing referral options, leaving them feeling like their own care coordinator. Disparities in post-treatment care between metropolitan and rural participants were observed. CONCLUSION There is a need for improved discharge preparation and information for GPs, and earlier recognition of concerns following CRC treatment to ensure timely management and access to services in the community, supported by system-level initiatives and appropriate interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bora Kim
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Nursing & Midwifery and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Notre Dame University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cheri Ostroff
- Consumer Representative, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and University of South Australia, Centre for Workplace Excellence, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Louise Acret
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marguerite Tracy
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Janani Mahadeva
- MQ Health General Practice, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon M Willcock
- MQ Health General Practice, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chelmow D, Cejtin H, Conageski C, Farid H, Gecsi K, Kesterson J, Khan MJ, Long M, O'Hara JS, Burke W. Executive Summary of the Lower Anogenital Tract Cancer Evidence Review Conference. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:708-724. [PMID: 37543740 PMCID: PMC10424818 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sponsored a project conducted by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to develop educational materials for clinicians on the prevention and early diagnosis of gynecologic cancers. For this final module, focusing on the cancers of the lower anogenital tract (vulva, vagina, and anus), a panel of experts in evidence assessment from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASCCP, and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology reviewed relevant literature and current guidelines. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members. Representatives from stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations met virtually in September 2022 to review and provide comment. This article is the executive summary of the review. It covers prevention, early diagnosis, and special considerations of lower anogenital tract cancer. Knowledge gaps are summarized to provide guidance for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chelmow
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Stroger Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, and Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, UPMC-Central PA, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania; and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Borre M, Fassov J, Poulsen JL, Christensen P, Laurberg S, Drewes AM, Krogh K. Dietary Intervention Improves Gastrointestinal Symptoms after Treatment of Cancer in the Pelvic Organs. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4766. [PMID: 37510881 PMCID: PMC10380860 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common in patients receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or surgery for cancer in the pelvic organs. The aim of the present prospective cohort study was to report the efficacy of dietary intervention in patients with chronic GI sequelae to treatment of cancer in pelvic organs and insufficient symptomatic effect of medical treatment. Eighty-eight patients were offered specialist dietitian guidance. Gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life were assessed before and after intervention by validated questionnaires. The main dietary interventions were low-fat diet (n = 44; 50%), modification of dietary fiber content (n = 19; 33%), dietary restrictions with a low-FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet (n = 18; 20%), gluten-free diet (n = 1; 1%), and other dietary advice (n = 6; 7%). Compared to baseline, dietary intervention improved quality of life (EQ5D scale) (p < 0.01), bowel function for the last four weeks (p < 0.02), stool frequency (p < 0.03), constipation (p < 0.05), incomplete rectal emptying at defecation (p < 0.02), and performing usual activities (p < 0.0). In conclusion, this observational study using tailored dietary intervention showed that symptoms can be reduced and quality of life can be improved in patients with chronic GI sequelae following treatment of cancer in the pelvic organs not responding sufficiently to medical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Borre
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.F.); (K.K.)
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.L.P.); (P.C.); (S.L.); (A.M.D.)
| | - Janne Fassov
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.F.); (K.K.)
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.L.P.); (P.C.); (S.L.); (A.M.D.)
| | - Jakob Lykke Poulsen
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.L.P.); (P.C.); (S.L.); (A.M.D.)
- Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.L.P.); (P.C.); (S.L.); (A.M.D.)
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.L.P.); (P.C.); (S.L.); (A.M.D.)
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.L.P.); (P.C.); (S.L.); (A.M.D.)
- Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Klaus Krogh
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.F.); (K.K.)
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (J.L.P.); (P.C.); (S.L.); (A.M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ren Q, Chen Y, Shao X, Guo L, Xu X. Lymph nodes primary staging of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:162. [PMID: 37143144 PMCID: PMC10157899 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01124-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for lymph node (LN) metastasis primary staging in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-DTA statement. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) were searched for studies on 18F-FDG PET/MRI for diagnosing LN metastasis. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and area under the curve (AUC) were applied to assess the diagnostic performance. Heterogeneity was identified and processed using meta-regression and sensitivity analysis. All data analyses were performed via STATA 15 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. RESULTS There were finally 7 studies included, involving a total of 184 patients. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.108 (P = 0.818), with no threshold-effect observed. The pooled SEN was 0.81 (95%CI 0.66-0.90) and the SPE was 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-0.96). In sub-groups, prospective groups demonstrated to have the highest SEN of 0.92 (95%CI 0.79-1.00). The studies conducted by Catalano et al. and Kang et al. were considered to be potential sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET/MRI has shown remarkable diagnostic performance in identification of LN metastases in newly diagnosed CRC patients. It would be of great application value for the primary staging of CRC lymph node metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingwei Ren
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang, China
| | - Yanyan Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dongyang Women & Children Hospital, No. 40, Wuning East Road, Dongyang, 322100, China.
| | - Xuejun Shao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang, China
| | - Lanzhong Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dongyang Women & Children Hospital, No. 40, Wuning East Road, Dongyang, 322100, China
| | - Xinxin Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thong MSY, Doege D, Weißer L, Koch-Gallenkamp L, Jansen L, Bertram H, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Nennecke A, Waldmann A, Zeissig SR, Brenner H, Arndt V. Persisting Deficits in Health-Related Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Survivors 14–24 Years Post-Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:3373-3390. [PMID: 36975470 PMCID: PMC10047200 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors >10 years post-diagnosis is understudied. We aimed to compare the HRQOL of CRC survivors 14–24 years post-diagnosis to that of age- and sex-matched non-cancer controls, stratified by demographic and clinical factors. (2) Methods: We used data from 506 long-term CRC survivors and 1489 controls recruited from German population-based multi-regional studies. HRQOL was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire. We estimated differences in the HRQOL of CRC survivors and controls with multiple regression, adjusted for age at survey, sex, and education, where appropriate. (3) Results: CRC survivors reported poorer social functioning but better health status/QOL than controls. CRC survivors, in general, had higher levels of symptom burden, and in particular diarrhea and constipation, regardless of demographic or clinical factors. In stratified analyses, HRQOL differed by age, sex, cancer type, and having a permanent stoma. (4) Conclusions: Although CRC survivors may have a comparable health status/QOL to controls 14–24 years after diagnosis, they still live with persistent bowel dysfunction that can negatively impact aspects of functioning. Healthcare providers should provide timely and adapted follow-up care to ameliorate potential long-term suffering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa S. Y. Thong
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-6221-42-2334
| | - Daniela Doege
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Linda Weißer
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Koch-Gallenkamp
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heike Bertram
- Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Andrea Eberle
- Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology—BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | | | | | - Annika Waldmann
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Sylke Ruth Zeissig
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry (ICE-B), Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
- Cancer Registry of Rhineland-Palatinate, 55116 Mainz, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pelosi AC, Rostirola GC, Pereira JS, Silva KC, Fontanari MER, Oliveira MSP, dos Reis IGM, Messias LHD. Remote and Unsupervised Exercise Strategies for Improving the Physical Activity of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:723. [PMID: 36900728 PMCID: PMC10000866 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11050723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) burden across the world is expected to increase by ~2.2 million new cases and ~1.1 million deaths by 2030. Regular physical exercise is recommended to prevent CRC, but the myriad of protocols preclude further discussion on how to manage its variables for this population. Home-based exercise guided by remote monitoring provides an alternative to surpass the barriers of supervised exercise. However, no meta-analysis was conducted to verify the effectiveness of this intervention for improving physical activity (PA). We performed a systematic review of remote and unsupervised strategies imposed on CRC patients for improving PA and compared, via a meta-analysis, their effectiveness against CRC patients submitted to usual care or no intervention. The databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched on 20 September 2022. Eleven studies attained the criteria for eligibility in the qualitative approach, and seven were included in the meta-analysis. No significant effect (p = 0.06) of remote and unsupervised exercise intervention was observed. However, a sensitivity analysis including three studies that only considered CRC patients was performed, demonstrating a significant effect in favor of exercise (p = 0.008). Based on our sensitivity analysis, remote and unsupervised exercise strategies were effective to improve the PA of CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Leonardo Henrique Dalcheco Messias
- Research Group on Technology Applied to Exercise Physiology (GTAFE), Laboratory of Multidisciplinary Research, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista 12916-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Haas S, Mikkelsen AH, Kronborg CJS, Oggesen BT, Møller PF, Fassov J, Frederiksen NA, Krogsgaard M, Graugaard-Jensen C, Ventzel L, Christensen P, Emmertsen KJ. Management of treatment-related sequelae following colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:458-488. [PMID: 35969031 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Colorectal cancer survivors are one of the most rapidly growing groups of patients living with and beyond cancer. In a national multidisciplinary setting, we have examined the extent of late treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors and present the scientific evidence for management of these conditions in this patient category with the aim of facilitating identification and treatment. METHOD A systematic search for existing guidelines and relevant studies was performed across 16 and 4 databases, respectively, from inception to 2021. This yielded 13 guidelines and 886 abstracts, of which 188 were included in the finalized guideline (231 included for full text review). Secondarily, bibliographies were cross-referenced and 53 additional articles were included. RESULTS Symptoms have been divided into overall categories including psychosocial, bowel-related, urinary, sexual (male and female), pain/neuropathy and fatigue symptoms or complaints that are examined individually. Merging and grading of data resulted in 22 recommendations and 42 management strategies across categories. Recommendations are of a more general character, whereas management strategies provide more practical advice suited for initiation on site before referral to specialized units. CONCLUSION Treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors are common and attention needs to be focused on identifying patients with unmet treatment needs and the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Haas
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Pia F Møller
- Department of Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Janne Fassov
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lise Ventzel
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bakkers C, van de Vlasakker VCJ, Rovers KPB, Lurvink RJ, Nienhuijs SW, Burger JWA, Creemers GJM, Bonhof CS, Mols F, de Hingh IHJT. The Impact of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) versus Conventional Surgery on Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Comparative Cohort Study between the CAIRO6 Trial and the PROCORE Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030788. [PMID: 36765746 PMCID: PMC9913313 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose-To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal metastases to PROs of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing conventional surgery. Methods-Data were extracted from the CAIRO6 trial (CRS-HIPEC group) and the PROCORE study (conventional surgery group). Nine predefined PROs (derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) were compared at baseline, in the early postoperative period and one year postoperatively, with correction for treatment with systemic therapy using linear mixed modeling. Results-In total, 331 patients were included: 71 in the CRS-HIPEC group and 260 in the conventional surgery group. All predefined PROs (fatigue, diarrhea, C30 summary score, Global Health Status, physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning) did not differ significantly between the groups at all three timepoints, and differential effects over time for all PROs did not differ significantly between the groups. Significant worsening of fatigue, C30 summary score, physical and role functioning (both groups), and cognitive and social functioning (conventional surgery group only) was present in the early postoperative period. All scores returned to baseline at one year postoperatively, except for physical and cognitive functioning in the conventional surgery group. Emotional functioning improved postoperatively in both groups compared to baseline. Conclusion-Despite a more extensive procedure with greater risk of morbidity, CRS-HIPEC in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases did not have a greater negative impact on PROs than conventional surgery in patients with CRC. Further, systemic therapy did not affect these PROs. These findings may facilitate future patient counseling and shared decision making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koen P. B. Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J. Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W. Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W. A. Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M. Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia S. Bonhof
- Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, P.O. Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, P.O. Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-40-239-7150
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Information Provision, Decision Self-efficacy, and Decisional Conflict in Adopting Health Behaviors Among Patients Treated for Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study. Cancer Nurs 2023; 46:45-56. [PMID: 34817417 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health promotion is necessary to mitigate the negative consequences of colorectal cancer and its treatment. Rates of behavior modification are low in populations of cancer patients. Studies are needed to determine the factors, such as decisional conflict, which influence adoption of healthy behaviors following a cancer diagnosis. OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of information provision, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict on the adoption of healthy behaviors among patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS This cross-sectional study focused on 251 patients with colorectal cancer in South Korea. Information provision, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict were measured using validated instruments. Patients rated their decisional conflict related to the adoption of behaviors that include regular exercise and a balanced diet. RESULTS Most participants (73%) reported low satisfaction with the amount of information received. Of the participants, 64% had low decision self-efficacy, and 80% experienced decisional conflict. The perception of a higher level of information provision was associated with greater decision self-efficacy (odds ratio, 4.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-13.35). Higher decision self-efficacy was associated with lower decisional conflict (odds ratio, 5.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.33-11.59). CONCLUSION Receiving adequate information is important for promoting patients' confidence in making decisions about their health and reducing decisional conflict in the adoption of healthy lifestyle changes following a cancer diagnosis. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE Oncology nurses should assess patient information needs and promote decision self-efficacy, thus empowering patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer to make lifestyle decisions that improve their health and quality of life.
Collapse
|
13
|
Borre M, Fassov J, Juul T, Laurberg S, Christensen P, Bräuner AB, Thorlacius Ussing O, Lauritzen MB, Drewes AM, Faaborg PM, Krogh K. Diet and bowel symptoms among colon cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:1192-1199. [DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2101901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Borre
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Janne Fassov
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Therese Juul
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annette Boesen Bräuner
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Viborg, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Ole Thorlacius Ussing
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Michael Bødker Lauritzen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
| | - Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Pia Møller Faaborg
- Department of Surgery, Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Klaus Krogh
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sun V, Crane TE, Freylersythe S, Slack SD, Yung A, Krouse RS, Thomson CA. Altering Intake and Managing Symptoms: Feasibility of a Diet Modification Intervention for Post-Treatment Bowel Dysfunction in Rectal Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2022; 26:283-292. [PMID: 35604741 DOI: 10.1188/22.cjon.283-292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bowel dysfunction is a common long-term effect of rectal cancer treatment that affects a survivor's quality of life, with few empirically based interventions for symptom management. OBJECTIVES The objective was to determine the acceptability of diet modification for bowel dysfunction in postsurgical rectal cancer survivors. METHODS 11 rectal cancer survivors who were at least six months post-treatment and reported moderate to severe bowel symptoms completed 10 telephone coaching sessions focusing on diet and symptom management over four months. Feasibility was assessed by study enrollment rate and intervention completion rate. FINDINGS Diet modification coaching for bowel symptom management is feasible for post-treatment rectal cancer survivors. The intervention can be evaluated for efficacy because of potential to serve as a scalable and accessible approach for effective bowel symptom management.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rosenberg J, Oggesen BT, Hamberg MLS, Danielsen AK. Establishment of a nurse-led clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer surgery: a descriptive study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:6243-6250. [PMID: 35445868 PMCID: PMC9022613 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07061-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Survival rates after colorectal and anal cancer are increasing and more patients have late complications to treatment. This represents a clinical field under development, and we have established a specialized clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer. With this paper, we want to give our experiences and present the organizational setup with a nurse as the primary contact person. Methods We have established a multidisciplinary clinic for the treatment of late complications and the clinic is organized with specialized nurses as the front persons. The structure includes a stepwise increase in expertise level when needed, and the patient has one common entry regardless of symptoms. Initial screening is performed by an electronic questionnaire which is followed up by a consultation with the nurse. The nurse can provide primary treatment according to local algorithms developed in the clinic and refer the patient to more specialized care if needed. Results Experiences from the first year of service show that more than half of the patients needs this and wants consultation in the late complication clinic. We also found that most of the consultations were performed successfully by phone instead of by physical visits, and the most common clinical problem was bowel symptoms including diarrhea and urge. Conclusion We have established a nurse-led clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer. There seems to be a high need for this function in a department taking care of colorectal and anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Birthe Thing Oggesen
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu Y, Ni X, Wang R, Liu H, Guo Z. Application of rational emotive behavior therapy in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Nurs Sci 2022; 9:147-154. [PMID: 35509702 PMCID: PMC9052253 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore the effects of our rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) program on symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sleep state in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing chemotherapy. Methods From October 2020 to May 2021, fifty-six patients with CRC in a hospital in the Hunan Province were randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 28) and a control group (n = 28). The patients in the intervention group completed a 6-week REBT program based on routine nursing care, including four courses: 1) establish a relationship and formulate health files; 2) group communications and study symptom management; 3) continuously provide health knowledge and strengthen healthy behavior; and 4) review the treatment and summary. The control group maintained routine nursing care. The simplified Chinese version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS–SF–SC), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale were used to investigate and compare the intervention effects of the two groups at baseline (T1, before the intervention), four weeks (T2), and six weeks (T3) after the intervention. Results The intervention group was significantly improved in symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sleep state, compared with the control group. At T2, MSAS–SF–SC (24.43 ± 4.26 vs.28.07 ± 3.91), symptom distress (17.29 ± 4.04 vs. 19.39 ± 3.59), symptom frequency (7.14 ± 1.51 vs. 8.68 ± 1.42), HADS (13.68 ± 3.38 vs. 15.86 ± 3.79), anxiety (3.89 ± 1.85 vs. 5.18 ± 2.18), and depression (9.79 ± 2.06 vs. 10.68 ± 2.23), showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At T3, MSAS–SF–SC (23.89 ± 3.54 vs. 30.14 ± 3.94), symptom distress (17.61 ± 3.52 vs. 21.32 ± 3.57), symptom frequency (6.29 ± 1.49 vs. 8.82 ± 1.47), HADS (11.82 ± 2.57 vs. 16.29 ± 3.13), anxiety (3.21 ± 1.64 vs. 5.61 ± 1.77), and depression (8.61 ± 1.52 vs. 10.68 ± 1.81), showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The sleep state of the intervention group was better than the control group at T3, with decreased score of PSQI [4.00 (3.00,8.00) vs. 9.00 (7.00,12.50), Z = −3.706, P < 0.001]. Conclusion The 6-week REBT program can effectively improve the symptom, anxiety, depression, and sleep state of patients with CRC undergoing chemotherapy, which could as a care plan for patients with CRC who are repeatedly admitted to the hospital for chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxin Liu
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoyan Ni
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Rong Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Huini Liu
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Zifen Guo
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
- Institute of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cuthbert C, Nixon N, Vickers M, Samimi S, Rawson K, Ramjeesingh R, Karim S, Stein B, Laxdal G, Dundas L, Huband D, Daze E, Farrer C, Cheung WY. Top 10 research priorities for early-stage colorectal cancer: a Canadian patient-oriented priority-setting partnership. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E278-E287. [PMID: 35351780 PMCID: PMC9259415 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer, one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers, is now being detected earlier and treatments are improving, which means that patients are living longer. Partnering with Canadian clinicians, patients and researchers, we aimed to determine research priorities for those living with early-stage colorectal cancer in Canada. METHODS We followed the well-established priority-setting partnership outlined by the James Lind Alliance to identify and prioritize unanswered questions about early-stage (i.e., stages I-III) colorectal cancer. The study was conducted from September 2018 to September 2020. We surveyed patients, caregivers and clinicians from across Canada between June 2019 and December 2019. We categorized the responses using thematic analysis to generate a list of unique questions. We conducted an interim prioritization survey from April 2020 to July 2020, with patients, caregivers and clinicians, to determine a shorter list of questions, which was then reviewed at a final meeting (involving patients, caregivers and clinicians) in September 2020. At that meeting, we used a consensus-based process to determine the top 10 priorities. RESULTS For the initial survey, 370 responses were submitted by 185 individuals; of the 98 individuals who provided demographic information, 44 (45%) were patients, 16 (16%) were caregivers, 7 (7%) were members of an advocacy group, 26 (27%) were health care professionals and 5 (5%) were categorized as "other." The responses were refined to create a list of 66 unique unanswered questions. Twenty-five respondents answered the interim prioritization survey: 13 patients (52%), 2 caregivers (8%), 3 advocacy group members (12%) and 7 health care professionals (28%). This led to a list of the top 30 questions. The final consensus meeting involved 20 individuals (10 patients [50%], 3 caregivers [15%] and 7 health care professionals [35%]), who agreed to the top 10 research priorities. The priorities covered a range of topics, including screening, treatment, recurrence, management of adverse effects and decision-making. INTERPRETATION We determined the top research priorities for early-stage colorectal cancer using a collaborative partnership of stake-holders from across Canada. The priorities covered a broad range of topics that could be addressed by future research, including improved screening practices, the role of personalized medicine, the management of adverse effects of treatment, decision-making and prevention of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Cuthbert
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Nancy Nixon
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Michael Vickers
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Setareh Samimi
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Krista Rawson
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Ravi Ramjeesingh
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Safiya Karim
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Barry Stein
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Garry Laxdal
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Lorilee Dundas
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Diane Huband
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Emily Daze
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Christie Farrer
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Poço Gonçalves J, Veiga D, Araújo A. Chronic pain, functionality and quality of life in cancer survivors. Br J Pain 2021; 15:401-410. [PMID: 34840788 DOI: 10.1177/2049463720972730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing number of cancer survivors associated to a longer average life-span after diagnosis of an oncological disease facilitates the observation of deleterious long-term effects of both oncological disease and its treatment. Among these effects, chronic pain emerges as one of the most prevalent and, with its onset, there is a decrease in these patients' functionality and quality of life. The main focus in oncological disease treatment has been tumour eradication and average life expectancy extension after diagnosis, neglecting these deleterious long-term effects. This study aims at assessing the prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in cancer survivors as well as pain interference in their quality of life and functionality. The study selected cancer survivors (n = 85) after dismissal from oncology service to assess the presence and characteristics of chronic pain, their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pain-related disability through a combination of different questionnaires. Chronic pain prevalence was 23.5%. In total, 85% of patients reported neuropathic pain descriptors and 45% presented diagnostic criteria for neuropathic pain. Of these patients, 45% were followed-up for pain surveillance and 35% underwent analgesic medication. There was a median pain disability index of 20.50 (14.50-35.00) and an average HRQoL of 0.5338 in chronic pain patients and 0.8872 in patients without pain. We found that chronic pain was the main negative predictor of HRQoL and was associated with decreased functionality. This study also concluded that these patients often were not offered the appropriate long-term medical follow-up. These findings highlight a need to raise awareness among health professionals to the importance of timely diagnosis and treatment of pain and its impact on HRQoL and functionality of long-term cancer survivors as well as the need to change clinical practice in order to improve healthcare provided to these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Poço Gonçalves
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Dalila Veiga
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - António Araújo
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version. Qual Life Res 2021; 31:1871-1881. [PMID: 34837128 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03036-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale is one of the most commonly used and validated measures to assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in this population. However, there are some aspects related to its structure that still deserve consideration. The aim of this study was to test the substantive improvement over the original QLACS structure resulting from several proposals reflected in the literature. METHOD Using a cross-sectional design and Confirmatory Factorial Analysis, we explored those proposals. Reliability, convergent validity, and factor invariance across three cancer survivorships phases (re-entry, early, and long term) were also analyzed. 1.862 post-treatment survivors of diverse cancer types completed the Spanish versions of QLACS, Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), and Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS). RESULTS The original model with twelve domains, grouped (with the exception of benefits) into a single total score, versus two subtotal (Generic and Cancer-specific) obtained a good fit. The values of Cronbach's alpha, Composite reliability, Average Variance Extracted indexes, and Pearson correlations supported the internal consistency and temporal stability (interval of 2-3 weeks) of the QLACS. Results also showed its adequate convergent validity and an invariant factor structure across survival periods (re-entry survivorship, early survivorship, long-term survivorship). CONCLUSION In its original structure, albeit the replacement of the scores on the two subscales by a total score, our results support QLACS as a valid and useful tool for the assessment of HRQoL in post-treatment cancer survivors throughout the different survival phases.
Collapse
|
20
|
Andreu Y, Martinez P, Soto-Rubio A, Fernández S, Bosch C, Cervantes A. Colorectal cancer survival: prevalence of psychosocial distress and unmet supportive care needs. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1483-1491. [PMID: 34529142 PMCID: PMC8443896 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06513-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of distress and unmet supportive care needs in post-treatment colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Also, to explore the association between both variables and to identify potential associated sociodemographic and cancer-related risk factors. Methods A cross-sectional study of 200 CRC survivors who at least 1 month before had completed the primary treatment for CRC was conducted. The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) and the Spanish version of Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs (S-CaSUN) were used. Results One in five CRC survivors showed clinical distress and 86% expressed at least one unmet need. Distress was positively associated with the prevalence of needs in all domains. All comprehensive care and information needs were expressed by at least 20% of survivors and some by more than 50%. Other needs also mentioned by 20% of survivors were financial support, ongoing case manager, and concerns about cancer recurrence. The risk factors associated were lower socioeconomic status, younger age, and a primary treatment that includes more than surgery. Conclusions The findings highlight the relevance of extending psychosocial care beyond the CRC primary medical treatment. A person-centered approach that addresses informational, emotional, social, and physical needs can increase satisfaction with care and also prevent psychological morbidity in CRC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Andreu
- Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Martinez
- Area of Health Sciences, Valencian International University, 46002, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Ana Soto-Rubio
- Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Silvia Fernández
- Asociación Carena, Valencia, Spain.,Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carles Bosch
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrés Cervantes
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grant M, Sun V, Tallman NJ, Wendel CS, McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Simons C, Mo J, Raza S, Donahue D, Passero F, Henson J, MacDougall L, Friedlaender J, Pitcher P, Fry D, Yonsetto P, Holcomb MJ, Hornbrook MC, Weinstein RS, Krouse RS. Cancer survivors' greatest challenges of living with an ostomy: findings from the Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) randomized trial. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1139-1147. [PMID: 34435212 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06449-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An ostomy results in lifelong quality of life changes for a cancer survivor. We describe the greatest challenges reported from a randomized trial of cancer survivors with stomas (ostomies). METHODS Cancer survivors with ostomies participating in a multi-site randomized prospective trial of an Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) program versus usual care (UC) were surveyed at six months post accrual. An open-ended question requested greatest challenges after ostomy surgery. Quantitative descriptive and qualitative analyses were used to examine greatest challenges reported. RESULTS A total of 118 trial participants identified greatest challenges with 55 in the OSMT and 63 in the UC. Six conceptual domains were used to code comments-physical, psychological, social, and spiritual quality of life; ostomy-specific issues, and healthcare issues. The OSMT contributed 187 comments, and UC contributed 235 comments. Ostomy specific issues and social well-being had the most comments overall with UC contributing more comments in all domains except physical well-being. Word Clouds revealed post-operative and treatment-related issues and going out in public as the most common challenges in both groups. Word Clouds compared types of ostomies revealing bowel function challenges (colostomy group), difficulties going out in public (ileostomy group), and positive support (urostomy group). CONCLUSIONS Fewer challenges submitted by the OSMT group provide the beginning evidence of the OSMT program impact. Dominant challenges across both groups were social well-being and ostomy care. Challenges varied by type of ostomy. Findings support long-term care and support for all cancer survivors with ostomies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02974634.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Grant
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | - Virginia Sun
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nancy J Tallman
- Unaffilated, Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurse, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Ruth McCorkle
- School of Nursing and School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ercolano
- School of Nursing and School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Julia Mo
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sabreen Raza
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dan Fry
- , Patient Stakeholder, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pete Yonsetto
- Arizona Telemedicine Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Michael J Holcomb
- Arizona Telemedicine Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Robert S Krouse
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and the Corporal Michael J Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Role of 18F-FDG PET-derived parameters for predicting complete response to chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell anal carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 41:1089-1094. [PMID: 32732599 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of metabolic parameters, calculated on pretreatment positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG), for predicting complete response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of patients affected by squamous cell anal carcinoma (SCAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical records of 20 patients affected by SCAC and treated with CRT were retrospectively evaluated. F-FDG PET/CT was performed at time 0 (baseline) and time 1 (12 weeks after CRT). The following parameters were extracted from PET at time 0: standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Response was assessed according to PET response criteria in solid tumors and classified as complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR) and progressive metabolic disease (PMD). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to analyze the predictive value of each PET-derived parameter on CMR. RESULTS Sixteen patients were finally enrolled. All presented increased F-FDG uptake in the primary tumor and 11 (68.7%) also showed metastatic lymph nodes. At PET/CT performed at time 1, 11 subjects (68.7%) presented CMR, three (18.7%) had PMR and the remaining two (12.5%) showed PMD (i.e. hepatic metastases). Among baseline PET-derived parameters, both MTV and TLG efficiently predicted response to CRT with an area under the curve of 0.9 (cutoff 62.3 cm, sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%, P = <0.0001) and 0.87 (cutoff 654.1 g, sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%, P = 0.004), respectively. CONCLUSION Among PET-derived parameters, both MTV and TLG presented a high predictive value on subjects' outcome after CRT.
Collapse
|
23
|
Puschel K, León A, Arancibia V, Aubel P, Velásquez Eng C, Sáez Ps S, Vinés E, León A, Thompson B, Are C. The interdisciplinary and psychosocial gap in cancer survivorship: A longitudinal study in a Latin American Cancer Center. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:876-885. [PMID: 34133760 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There is lack of information on the quality of care provided to the rapidly increasing population of cancer survivors in Latin America. Our study attempts to address this gap and to identify areas needed to be improved. METHODS A random sample of 210 breast and colorectal cancer survivors were selected from a hospital-based registry in Chile. Cancer registry information, electronic chart review, and personal interviews were used to assess medical and nonmedical care over a 5-year period. Survivorship care practices were compared to a standardized reference based on the US Institute of Medicine domains and the American Cancer Association guidelines. RESULTS Over 80% of breast and colorectal cancer survivors received appropriate medical care, ongoing testing surveillance and risk factors assessment. Only a third of survivors were assessed for psychosocial disorders and 25% of them received interdisciplinary care. Overall, 66.1% of breast and 58.6% of colorectal cancer survivors reached the expected quality level of cancer survivorship care according to the reference standard (p < .001). CONCLUSION Medical care practices reached a high standard in a leading cancer center in Latin America. However, a much stronger psychosocial assessment and interdisciplinary care is needed to improve survivorship cancer quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Puschel
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Augusto León
- Department of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Victor Arancibia
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paula Aubel
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Cristián Velásquez Eng
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sebastián Sáez Ps
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eugenio Vinés
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Augusto León
- Resident in Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
| | - Beti Thompson
- Public Health Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Chandrakanth Are
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Health-Related Quality of Life in Very Long-Term Cancer Survivors 14-24 Years Post-Diagnosis Compared to Population Controls: A Population-Based Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112754. [PMID: 34206134 PMCID: PMC8199519 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Little is known about the health-related quality of life in very long-term cancer survivors 10 and more years post-diagnosis. Therefore, we compared the health-related quality of life of survivors of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer (14–24 years post-diagnosis) with that of same-aged non-cancer controls, according to age, sex, and disease status (disease-free vs. stage IV, recurrence, metastasis, or second cancer). We found that the overall global health status/quality of life of cancer survivors more than a decade after diagnosis was slightly higher than that of population controls of the same age, but more symptoms and lower functioning were reported. Differences were small but statistically significant. Results differed by age, sex, and disease status. The findings point out the need for a comprehensive survivorship care program in order to monitor and treat potential late and long-term effects after the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Survivorship care should be risk-adapted to survivors’ needs according to sociodemographic and clinical factors. Abstract (1) Background: Little is known about the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in very long-term cancer survivors (VLTCS) 10 and more years post-diagnosis. The objective was to compare cancer survivors’ HRQoL 14–24 years post-diagnosis with that of same-aged non-cancer controls, stratified by age, sex, and disease status (disease-free vs. stage IV, recurrence, metastasis, or second cancer). (2) Methods: We recruited 2704 very long-term survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer, and 1765 controls in German multi-regional population-based studies. The HRQoL was assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Differences in the HRQoL were estimated with multiple regression, controlling for age, sex (where appropriate), and education. (3) Results: The overall global health status/quality of life of VLTCS more than a decade after diagnosis was slightly higher than that of population controls of the same age, but more symptoms and lower functioning were reported. Differences were small but statistically significant. Results differed by age, sex, and disease status. (4) Conclusions: The findings point out the need for a comprehensive survivorship care program in order to monitor and treat potential late and long-term effects after the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Survivorship care should be risk-adapted to survivors’ needs according to sociodemographic and clinical factors.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sun V, Reb A, Debay M, Fakih M, Ferrell B. Rationale and Design of a Telehealth Self-Management, Shared Care Intervention for Post-treatment Survivors of Lung and Colorectal Cancer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:414-420. [PMID: 33415649 PMCID: PMC7994229 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-01958-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Survivors of lung and colorectal cancer have high post-treatment needs; the majority are older and suffer from greater comorbidities and poor quality of life (QOL). They remain underrepresented in research, leading to significant disparities in post-treatment outcomes. Personalized post-treatment follow-up care and care coordination among healthcare teams is a priority for survivors of lung and colorectal cancer. However, there are few evidence-based interventions that address survivors' post-treatment needs beyond the use of a follow-up care plan. This paper describes the rationale and design of an evidence-informed telehealth intervention that integrates shared care coordination between oncology/primary care and self-management skills building to empower post-treatment survivors of lung and colorectal cancer. The intervention design was informed by (1) contemporary published evidence on cancer survivorship, (2) our previous research in lung and colorectal cancer survivorship, (3) the chronic care self-management model (CCM), and (4) shared post-treatment follow-up care between oncology and primary care. A two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial will determine the efficacy of the telehealth intervention to improve cancer care delivery and survivor-specific outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04428905.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | - Anne Reb
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Marc Debay
- Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Betty Ferrell
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Larsen HM, Mekhael M, Juul T, Borre M, Christensen P, Mohr Drewes A, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Laurberg S, Krogh K, Ladefoged Fassov J. Long-term gastrointestinal sequelae in colon cancer survivors: prospective pilot study on identification, the need for clinical evaluation and effects of treatment. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:356-366. [PMID: 33511684 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of the present pilot study was to describe the type and frequency of long-term gastrointestinal symptoms within a well-defined cohort of colon cancer survivors, their wish for clinical evaluation and treatment outcomes. METHOD A screening survey was sent to colon cancer survivors 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery. Based on their main symptoms, patients who wished to have a consultation were referred to the gastroenterological or surgical unit of our late cancer sequelae clinic. Treatment effect was monitored by questionnaires on bowel symptoms and the EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) quality-of-life score. RESULTS Overall, 953 patients who had survived colon cancer received the screening survey and 767 replied (response rate 80.5%). Of these, 76 (9.9%; 95% CI 7.9%-12.2%) were referred for algorithm-based clinical evaluation and treatment of bowel dysfunction. The majority were women (69.7%) who had undergone a right-sided colonic resection (65.8%). Patients reported various symptoms, mainly including urgency, fragmented defaecation, loose stools and incontinence for liquid stools. Patients with emptying difficulties and low anterior resection syndrome-like symptoms were referred to the surgical unit and patients with diarrhoea were referred to the gastroenterological unit for clinical work-up. Our main endpoint, mean EQ-5D index after treatment, was improved compared with baseline (baseline 0.809, after treatment 0.846; p = 0.049). After treatment, self-rated bowel function and several bowel symptoms were improved as well. CONCLUSION This study highlights the importance of identifying colon cancer survivors in need of treatment of late gastrointestinal sequelae and clinical management in a multidisciplinary team setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene M Larsen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mira Mekhael
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mette Borre
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark.,Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ole Thorlacius-Ussing
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Klaus Krogh
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Janne Ladefoged Fassov
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Juul T, Bräuner AB, Drewes AM, Emmertsen KJ, Krogh K, Laurberg S, Lauritzen MB, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Christensen P. Systematic screening for late sequelae after colorectal cancer-a feasibility study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:345-355. [PMID: 33420746 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a new method for systematic screening for late sequelae (LS) following colorectal cancer treatment. METHOD Patients with colorectal cancer from five Danish hospitals were invited to complete a survey about LS at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery as part of their follow-up. The survey consisted primarily of validated tools, supplemented by a few ad hoc items, measuring bowel, urinary and sexual dysfunction, pain and quality of life and an additional question regarding request for contact. Patients completed surveys electronically or on paper. RESULTS Of the 1721 invited patients, 1386 (80.5%) were included (1085 with colon cancer and 301 with rectal cancer) of whom 72.5% responded electronically. Patients responding electronically were 7.6 years younger than those responding on paper (P < 0.001). Since some patients answered more than once, the dataset consisted of 2361 surveys. Patients with colon cancer requested phone contact in 19.0% of the surveys, and 8.4% were referred to treatment for LS, primarily bowel dysfunction. Among patients with rectal cancer, 30.8% requested phone contact and 16.2% were referred for treatment of LS, mainly due to bowel and sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSION This is the first paper investigating a new method of systematic screening for LS following colorectal cancer using electronic patient-reported outcome measures. The study shows that in the Danish population a high response rate can be obtained with this method and that close to three-quarters of patients respond electronically. Patients with rectal cancer had a higher need for phone contact and treatment of LS than patients with colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Annette Boesen Bräuner
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Viborg, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aalborg, Denmark.,Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Randers, Randers, Denmark
| | - Klaus Krogh
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Michael Bødker Lauritzen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
| | - Ole Thorlacius-Ussing
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nadler MB, Rose AAN, Prince R, Eng L, Lott A, Grant RC, Jones JM, Enright K. Increasing Referrals of Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer to a Cancer Rehabilitation Program: A Quality Improvement Initiative. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 17:e593-e602. [PMID: 33290162 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with cancer are at risk for initial, late, and long-term effects of cancer and its treatments. Cancer rehabilitation (CR) focuses on prevention/treatment of these sequelae and optimization of physical, social, and vocational functioning. Our center has a multidisciplinary impairment-driven outpatient CR program, but referrals of patients with GI cancer were low. AIMS We aimed (for 2019, relative to 2018) (1) to increase CR referrals of patients with GI cancer by 50% and (2) to increase the proportion of referrals coming from oncologists. Balancing measures included inappropriate referrals and cancellations. METHODS A rapid cycle improvement approach was used to optimize GI referrals to the CR program. Barriers to CR referral were identified through a literature review and informal interviews of GI clinicians. Barriers included (a) knowledge of CR program existence, (b) awareness of the referral process, (c) time, and (d) lack of CR program exposure. The team used Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles every 2 months from January to December 2019 to address barriers. A p-chart was used to analyze the results. RESULTS PDSA cycles included CR program advertisement, a presentation to GI staff, nurse-led patient identification, patient-facing posters, and clinician thank-you emails. The p-chart showed a 100% relative increase in referral numbers and an improvement in the percentage of patients referred by oncologists from 51% to 75%. There was no significant change in inappropriate referrals or cancellations. CONCLUSION Through PDSA cycles, we improved the total number of patients with GI cancer and percentage referred by an oncologist to a CR program. Future work will assess sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle B Nadler
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - April A N Rose
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Prince
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lawson Eng
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anthony Lott
- University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert C Grant
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer M Jones
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katherine Enright
- University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Carlo Fidani Regional Cancer Centre, Trillium Health Partners-Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Is 18F-FDG PET/CT an Accurate Way to Detect Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2020; 2020:5439378. [PMID: 32733174 PMCID: PMC7383332 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5439378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Aims The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) for detection of lymph node (LN) metastasis of colorectal cancer. Material and Methods. A computerized search was performed to determine the relevant articles, published before October 2019. Stata Statistical Software, version 15.0, and Meta-Disc (version 1.4) were used for the meta-analysis. Results the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.65, 0.75, 4.57, and 0.37 respectively. Studies that used SUVmax cut-off value (≤2.5) demonstrated the best accuracy. Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/CT shows a low sensitivity and high specificity for detecting the metastasis of LNs in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.
Collapse
|
30
|
Husebø AML, Karlsen B, Husebø SE. Health professionals' perceptions of colorectal cancer patients' treatment burden and their supportive work to ameliorate the burden - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:661. [PMID: 32680491 PMCID: PMC7367378 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05520-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Support is pivotal for patients in managing colorectal cancer treatment, as they might be overwhelmed by the burden of treatment. There is scarce knowledge regarding health professionals' perceptions of colorectal cancer patients' burdens and supportive needs. The study aims to describe health professionals' perspectives on treatment burden among patients receiving curative surgical treatment for colorectal cancer during the hospital stay and how they support patients to ameliorate the burden. METHODS This study has a descriptive and explorative qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews with nine health professionals recruited from a gastrointestinal-surgery ward at a university hospital in Norway. Data were analysed by using systematic text condensation. RESULTS Data analysis identified the themes "capturing patients' burdens of colorectal cancer treatment" and "health professionals' support to ameliorate the burden". Patients with colorectal cancer had to face burdens related to a challenging emotional situation, treatment complications and side effects, and an extensive need for information. A trusting patient-carer relationship was therefore perceived as the essence of health professionals' support. Health professionals focused their support on safeguarding patients, motivating patients to self-manage, and involving family and peers as supporters. Patients' journey characteristics and illness severity challenged health professionals' supportive work. CONCLUSION Support from health professionals includes providing patients emotional support and relevant treatment-related information and motivating patients for early post-surgical mobilisation. Health professionals should be aware of identifying colorectal cancer patients' information needs according to the specific treatment stages, which may ameliorate the burden of colorectal cancer treatment and enable patients to self-manage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie Lunde Husebø
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4019, Stavanger, Norway.
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Sissel Eikeland Husebø
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4011, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|