Pre-diagnosis health-related quality of life and survival in older women with endometrial cancer

The challenge of ovarian cancer care in the oldest old

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the eighth most common cancer in women, with a poor prognosis, particularly in older women. The aim of this study was to describe an octogenarian population with OC and to examine the differences in net survival (NS) according to age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational population-based study from a gynecological cancer registry, patients aged > 18 years with an identified epithelial ovarian cancer stage IA to IVB diagnosed between 1998 and 2018 were included. Patients with non-available FIGO stage were excluded. Patients were stratified into three age groups: <70, 70-79 and ≥80 years, then by OC stage (FIGO I-II, IIIA-IIIB, IIIC-IV). Sociodemographic and cancer-related variables were compared using univariate test (Khi²). The 5-year NS was calculated using the Pohar-Perme method.

RESULTS

Among the 721 patients included: 462 (64.1 %) were younger than 70 years, 176 (24.4 %) were aged between 70 and 79 years, and 83 (11.85 %) were aged 80 years or older. Patients ≥80 years had a trend for lower rate of serous carcinoma than the other age subgroups. As age increased, patients were less likely to undergo surgery and chemotherapy. While 73 % of women <70 years received a combination of surgery and chemotherapy, the rate was 62 % among women 70-79 years and 27 % among women ≥80 years (p<.0001). When focusing on FIGO IIIC-IV stages, the 5-year NS rate for women <70 years was 45.1 % (95 % CI 39.1-52.0). For women 70-79 years, it was 25.9 % (95 % CI 18.6-36.1), and for those ≥80 years, it was 19.5 % (95 % CI 10.0-38.0) (p<.005).

DISCUSSION

The oldest patients had less optimal treatment and a lower NS compared to patients in their seventies or younger. Frailty should be carefully assessed to optimize care in the oldest patients with OC.

Temporal trends in self-reported general and mental health status among colorectal cancer patients: racial/ethnic disparities in a population-based analysis

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcomes are essential to patient-centered cancer care. We sought to determine the relationships between colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and trends in self-reported general health status (GHS) and mental health status (MHS) among racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

We used population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) data to identify CRC patients diagnosed from 1996 to 2011 who reported GHS and/or MHS on a CAHPS survey within 6 years before or after diagnosis and were 65 or older at survey completion. Multivariable logistic regression assessed relationships of patient race/ethnicity and CRC diagnosis with the odds of reporting fair or poor GHS or MHS.

RESULTS

Five thousand five hundred forty-five patients reported GHS and/or MHS within 6 years before CRC diagnosis and 4,604 reported GHS and/or MHS within 6 years after diagnosis. 80.9% were non-Hispanic white (NHW), 7.1% were non-Hispanic black (NHB), 6.7% were Hispanic, and 5.3% were non-Hispanic Asian. Being diagnosed with CRC was associated with increased odds of reporting fair or poor GHS (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.40-1.72) and MHS (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.13-1.58). For GHS, this trend held for all race/ethnicities except NHBs, and for MHS, this trend held for NHWs and Hispanics only.

CONCLUSION

CRC diagnosis is an important driver of increased likelihood of fair and poor GHS and MHS, but the relationship is complicated by effect modification by race/ethnicity. Efforts to further understand the race/ethnicity-specific relationships between CRC diagnosis and declines in GHS and MHS are necessary to promote equitable care for all patients.