1
|
Jensen-Battaglia M, LoCastro M, Oh H, Sanapala C, Flannery M, Mendler JH, Liesveld J, Huselton E, Loh KP. Patient-oncologist discussion of treatment decisions: Exploring the role of a patient-centered communication tool for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia and their caregivers. J Geriatr Oncol 2024:101716. [PMID: 38336521 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Jensen-Battaglia
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Marissa LoCastro
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Haejung Oh
- The Catholic University of Korea, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Marie Flannery
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Jason H Mendler
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Jane Liesveld
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Eric Huselton
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lindsay S, Kosareva P, Thomson N, Stinson J. A Codeveloped Web-Based Disability Disclosure Toolkit for Youth With Disabilities: Mixed Methods Pilot Evaluation. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e48609. [PMID: 38064264 PMCID: PMC10746977 DOI: 10.2196/48609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Youth and young adults with disabilities experience many barriers in securing employment such as discrimination, inaccessible environments, and lack of support. Youth often need to decide whether and how they should disclose their need for accommodations to employers, which can help them to do their best at work. However, few evidence-based toolkits focusing on disability disclosure exist for youth with various types of disabilities. Supporting youth to develop self-advocacy skills is salient because they are an underrepresented and marginalized group in the labor market. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to conduct a pilot evaluation of a web-based toolkit to enhance disability disclosure for youth and young adults helping to advocate for their needs and request workplace accommodations. METHODS We conducted 2 in-person focus groups to codevelop a web-based disability disclosure toolkit, which was followed by a pilot evaluation with a pre-post survey. Primary outcomes focused on the relevance of the toolkit content, preliminary perceived impact on knowledge and confidence, and open-ended feedback on the usefulness of the toolkit. Secondary outcomes focused on effectiveness (ie, measures of self-determination). RESULTS A total of 14 youths with various types of disabilities took part in the study (aged 20-25 years; n=11, 78% female) including 3 who participated in the codevelopment focus group sessions and 11 youths who participated in the surveys. Our findings involved three main themes in the codevelopment sessions that included (1) disability disclosure and workplace accommodation experiences (ie, knowing when, whether, and how to disclose their disability and request workplace accommodations), (2) usefulness of the tool (ie, relatable content, format and design, and suggestions for further development), and (3) perceived impact of the toolkit (ie, navigating disclosure decisions and how to approach employers and develop other relevant employment skills). The survey findings showed that the majority of participants (10/11, 91%) reported that the toolkit increased or changed their knowledge or understanding of disability disclosure. Most participants (8/11, 73%) reported that the toolkit helped to increase their perceived confidence in their daily activities. The majority of participants (8/11, 73%) agreed or strongly agreed that the toolkit was easy to understand and comprehensive. Regarding the preliminary impact of the toolkit, participants did not demonstrate any significant improvements in self-determination (all P>.05). CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasize the importance of codeveloping a disability disclosure toolkit with youth to enhance its relevance for their needs. Our toolkit indicates preliminary potential as an educational resource for youth and young adults with disabilities as they search for and secure employment. Further research is needed to assess the impact of the tool with larger samples to understand the impact of workplace disability disclosure decisions for youth with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Lindsay
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Polina Kosareva
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Thomson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stinson
- Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
LoCastro M, Sanapala C, Wang Y, Jensen‐Battaglia M, Wittink M, Norton S, Klepin HD, Richardson DR, Mendler JH, Liesveld J, Huselton E, O'Dwyer K, Cortes A, Rodriguez C, Dale W, Loh KP. Patient-centered communication tool for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia, their caregivers, and oncologists: A single-arm pilot study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:8581-8593. [PMID: 36533397 PMCID: PMC10134384 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a single-arm pilot study, we assessed the feasibility and usefulness of an innovative patient-centered communication tool (UR-GOAL tool) that addresses aging-related vulnerabilities, patient values, and prognostic awareness for use in treatment decision making between older adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), their caregivers, and oncologists. METHODS Primary feasibility metric was retention rate; >50% was considered feasible. We collected recruitment rate, usefulness, and outcomes including AML knowledge (range 0-14) and perceived efficacy in communicating with oncologists (range 5-25). Due to the pilot nature and small sample size, hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10. RESULTS We included 15 patients (mean age 76 years, range 64-88), 12 caregivers, and 5 oncologists; enrollment and retention rates for patients were 84% and 73%, respectively. Patients agreed that the UR-GOAL tool helped them understand their AML diagnosis and treatment options, communicate with their oncologist, and make more informed decisions. From baseline to post-intervention, patients and caregivers scored numerically higher on AML knowledge (patients: +0.6, p = 0.22; caregivers: +1.1, p = 0.05) and perceived greater efficacy in communicating with their oncologists (patients: +1.5, p = 0.22; caregivers: +1.2, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION We demonstrated that it is feasible to incorporate the UR-GOAL tool into treatment decision making for older patients with AML, their caregivers, and oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa LoCastro
- School of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of RochesterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Chandrika Sanapala
- Burrell College of Osteopathic MedicineLas CrucesNew MexicoUnited States
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Marsha Wittink
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Sally Norton
- School of NursingUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Heidi D. Klepin
- Section on Hematology and OncologyWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center BlvdWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Daniel R. Richardson
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jason H. Mendler
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Jane Liesveld
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Eric Huselton
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Kristen O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Chrystina Rodriguez
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - William Dale
- Department of Supportive CareCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao J, Abdallah M, Sanapala C, Watson E, LoCastro M, Castillo DA, Richardson D, LeBlanc TW, Loh KP. A Systematic Review of Decision Aids in Hematologic Malignancies: What Are Currently Available and What Are We Missing? Oncologist 2022; 28:105-115. [PMID: 36342114 PMCID: PMC9907042 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient decision aids (PDAs) are tools designed to facilitate decision-making. In this systematic review, we summarized existing studies on the development and evaluation of PDAs for patients with hematologic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for articles in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included studies, abstracts, and clinical trial protocols available in English involving PDAs for patients age ≥18 diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy and/or their caregivers. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of the 5281 titles/abstracts screened, 15 were included: 1 protocol, 7 abstracts, and 7 full-texts. Six were PDA developmental studies, 6 were pilot studies, and 3 were randomized trials. PDA formats included electronic with web content, videos, and/or audio, questionnaires, bedside instruments, and a combination of various formats. Average participant age ranged from 36.0 to 62.4 years. Patients and caregivers identified efficacy, adverse effects, cost, and quality of life as important decision-making factors. PDAs were associated with increased knowledge and patient satisfaction as well as decreased decisional conflict and attitudinal barriers. Research on PDAs for adult patients with hematologic malignancies and their caregivers is limited. Among the studies, PDAs appear to support patients in shared decision-making. CONCLUSION While current literature examining the use of PDAs for adults with hematologic malignancies is limited, the positive impact of PDAs on shared decision-making and patient outcomes warrants additional research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Zhao
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Maya Abdallah
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chandrika Sanapala
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin Watson
- Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marissa LoCastro
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Daniel A Castillo
- Edward G. Miner Library, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Richardson
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Department of Medicine, Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine Durham, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Corresponding author: Kah Poh Loh, MBBCh BAO, MS, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Tel: +1 585 276 4353;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adapting a patient-centered communication tool for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and their oncologist. Blood Adv 2022; 6:5707-5710. [PMID: 35930701 PMCID: PMC9618777 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
6
|
Barlet MH, Ubel PA, Weinfurt KP, Glass HC, Pollak KI, Brandon DH, Lemmon ME. Decisional Satisfaction, Regret, and Conflict Among Parents of Infants with Neurologic Conditions. J Pediatr 2022; 245:81-88.e3. [PMID: 35227757 PMCID: PMC9232962 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize decisional satisfaction, regret, and conflict among parents of critically ill infants with neurologic conditions. STUDY DESIGN In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled parents of infants with neurologic conditions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Hospital discharge surveys included the validated Family Satisfaction with the ICU (FS-ICU) decision making subscale, Decision Regret Scale (DRS), and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). We defined high satisfaction with decision making as an FS-ICU score ≥75, high decisional regret/conflict as DRS/DCS score >25, and within-couple disagreement as a difference of at least 25 points between scores. RESULTS We enrolled 61 parents of 40 infants (n = 40 mothers, n = 21 fathers); 35 mothers and 15 fathers completed surveys. Most mothers reported high satisfaction with decision making (27 of 35; 77%) and low decision regret (28 of 35; 80%); 40% (14 of 35) reported high decisional conflict. Mothers and fathers reported higher decisional conflict in the domains of uncertainty and values clarity compared with the domain of effective decision making (Bonferroni-corrected P < .05). There were no differences in decision outcomes between paired mothers and fathers; however, within any given couple, there were numerous instances of disagreement (7 of 15 for decision regret and 5 of 15 for decisional conflict). CONCLUSIONS Many parents experience decisional conflict even if they ultimately have high satisfaction and low regret, underscoring the need for decision aids targeting uncertainty and values clarity. Couples frequently experience different levels of decisional regret and conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter A. Ubel
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin P. Weinfurt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hannah C. Glass
- Department of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Debra H. Brandon
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Monica E. Lemmon
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Code Status Transitions in Patients with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood Adv 2022; 6:4208-4215. [PMID: 35537113 PMCID: PMC9327548 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with AML often undergo code status transitions near the end of life; median time from last code status change to death was 2 days. Patients participated in only 60.5% of final code status transitions, highlighting a need for earlier conversations to improve involvement.
Patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often experience intensive medical care at the end of life (EOL), including high rates of hospitalizations and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Despite this, studies examining code status transitions are lacking. We conducted a mixed-methods study of 200 patients with high-risk AML enrolled in supportive care studies at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2014 and 2021. We defined high-risk AML as relapsed/refractory or diagnosis at age ≥60. We used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize code status transitions. At diagnosis, 86.0% (172/200) of patients were “full code” (38.5% presumed, 47.5% confirmed) and 8.5% had restrictions on life-sustaining therapies. Overall, 57.0% of patients experienced a transition during the study period. The median time from the last transition to death was 2 days (range, 0-350). Most final transitions (71.1%) were to comfort measures near EOL; only 60.5% of patients participated in these last transitions. We identified 3 conversation types leading to transitions: informative conversations focusing on futility after clinical deterioration (51.0%), anticipatory conversations at the time of acute deterioration (32.2%), and preemptive conversations (15.6%) before deterioration. Younger age (B = 0.04; P = .002) and informative conversations (B = −2.79; P < .001) were associated with shorter time from last transition to death. Over two-thirds of patients were “presumed full code” at diagnosis of high-risk AML, and most experienced code status transitions focused on the futility of continuing life-sustaining therapies near EOL. These results suggest that goals-of-care discussions occur late in the illness course for patients with AML and warrant interventions to increase earlier discussions regarding EOL preferences.
Collapse
|