1
|
Rowe A, Crawford-Williams F, Goodwin BC, Myers L, Stiller A, Dunn J, Aitken JF, March S. Survivorship care plans and information for rural cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:441-448. [PMID: 35334076 PMCID: PMC10036447 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01204-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to investigate the amount and type of survivorship care information received by cancer survivors living in rural Australia and whether this varies according to demographic factors or cancer type. METHODS Self-reported receipt of a survivorship care plan (SCP) and information on various aspects of survivorship care (e.g., managing side effects, healthy lifestyles, psychosocial advice and monitoring for recurrence) were collected from 215 cancer survivors who had returned home to a rural area in Queensland Australia after receiving cancer treatment in a major city within the previous 5 years (72% in the previous 12 months). Logistic regression was used to assess for differences across demographic factors and cancer type. RESULTS Only 35% of participants reported receiving a SCP and proportions of those reporting the receipt of specific information varied from 74% for information on short-term side effects to less than 30% for information on finances, chemoprevention and monitoring for signs of recurrence. No significant differences were found in the receipt of survivorship care information across demographic factors or cancer type. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that cancer survivors living in rural areas are not consistently provided with adequate survivorship care information, particularly that pertaining to long-term health and recovery. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Without improved systems for delivering survivorship care information to patients returning home to rural communities after treatment, these cancer survivors risk missing out on necessary information and advice to maintain their health, wellbeing and long-term recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlen Rowe
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
| | - Fiona Crawford-Williams
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
| | - Belinda C Goodwin
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia.
| | - Larry Myers
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
| | - Anna Stiller
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Springfield, QLD, 4300, Australia
| | - Sonja March
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Millar MM, Herget KA, Ofori-Atta B, Codden RR, Edwards SL, Carter ME, Belnap B, Kirchhoff AC, Sweeney C. Cancer survivorship experiences in Utah: an evaluation assessing indicators of survivors' quality of life, health behaviors, and access to health services. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:337-347. [PMID: 36723708 PMCID: PMC10367944 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01671-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The 2016-2020 Utah Comprehensive Cancer Prevention and Control Plan prioritized strategies to address cancer survivorship experiences. In this paper we present estimates for nine indicators evaluating these priorities, trends over time, and assess disparities in survivorship experiences across demographic subgroups. METHODS We surveyed a representative sample of Utah cancer survivors diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 with any reportable cancer diagnosis. We calculated weighted percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each indicator. We assessed change over time using a test for trend across survey years in a logistic regression model and used Rao-Scott F-adjusted chi-square tests to test the association between demographic characteristics and each survivorship indicator. RESULTS Most of the 1,793 respondents (93.5%) reported their pain was under control, 85.7% rated their overall health as good, very good, or excellent, but 46.5% experienced physical, mental, or emotional limitations. Only 1.7% of survivors aged 75 or older were current smokers, compared to 5.8% of 65-74-year-olds and 7.9% of survivors aged 55-74 (p < 0.006). No regular physical activity was reported by 20.6% and varied by survivor age and education level. The proportion who received a survivorship care plan increased from 34.6% in 2018 to 43.0% in 2021 (p = 0.025). However, survivors under age 55 were significantly less likely to receive a care plan than older survivors. CONCLUSION This representative survey of cancer survivors fills a gap in understanding of the cancer survivorship experience in Utah. Results can be used to evaluate and plan additional interventions to improve survivorship quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan M Millar
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | | | | | - Rachel R Codden
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sandra L Edwards
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Brad Belnap
- Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Utah Cancer Control Program, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Carol Sweeney
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim K, Xu W, Hong SJ, Starkweather A, Brown RF, Walsh S. Perceived discrimination and physical activity mediate the associations between receiving a survivorship care plan and cancer pain. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 78:102155. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
4
|
Duangchan C, Steffen A, Matthews AK. Thai oncology nurses' perspectives toward survivorship care plan components and implementation for colorectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4089-4098. [PMID: 35066665 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06766-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe oncology nurses' perspectives regarding survivorship care plan (SCP) components and implementation for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors in Thailand. METHODS A cross-sectional, descriptive online study was conducted between October and November 2020. Thai oncology nurses were recruited using Facebook and the Line application. Study participants (n = 160) rated the usefulness of four standard SCP components (treatment summaries, surveillance, late/long-term effects, and health promotion and psychosocial needs; n = 23 items) and gave input on the implementation of SCPs in clinical practice (n = 11 items). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Most oncology nurses supported providing CRC survivors with SCPs (93.2%) and felt that SCPs were an important part of their practice (93.7%). Nurses rated all four SCP components as "very useful," including treatment summaries (76.4%), surveillance (81.9%), late/long-term effects (85.7%), and health behavior and psychosocial concerns (80.2%). In terms of implementation, most nurses indicated that oncologists should prepare (84.4%) and provide SCPs (95%), but 61.9% and 69.4% of nurses, respectively, also believed that they should perform these tasks. In addition, most nurses indicated that they should play a significant role in the ongoing management of CRC survivors (95.7%) and that evidence-based surveillance guidelines are needed (96.2%). CONCLUSION Oncology nurses believed that the four SCP components were helpful to the long-term management of CRC survivors, supported SCP provision, and expressed their perceived responsibilities for preparing and delivering SCPs. The findings suggested opportunities for oncology nurses to play a significant role in developing and implementing SCPs. However, additional efforts are needed to expand nurses' roles in survivorship care and establish practice guidelines that will facilitate integration of SCPs into nursing practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherdsak Duangchan
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Faculty of Nursing, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Alana Steffen
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alicia K Matthews
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dibble KE, Kaur M, Lyu J, Connor AE. Evaluation of health perceptions and healthcare utilization among population-based female cancer survivors and cancer-free women. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:49-62. [PMID: 34613541 PMCID: PMC8738151 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01498-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer survivors are more likely to report having a poor health status when compared to the general population. Few studies have focused on the impact of cancer on health status and healthcare utilization/access outcomes among women from medically underserved populations. METHODS 25,741 women with and without a history of cancer from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2016 contributed data. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression for associations between cancer status and perceived health and healthcare utilization/access outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity, poverty status, education, and comorbidities. RESULTS 1,897 (7.0%) women had a history of cancer with breast cancer as the most common (n = 671, 35.7%). While most survivors were non-Hispanic white (69.4%), 13.9% were Hispanic, 12.0% were non-Hispanic Black, and 4.6% were additional racial/ethnic groups. Survivors were 1.32 times more likely to be hospitalized within the last year (95% CI 1.11-1.58) and 1.32 times more likely to see a mental health provider within the last year (95% CI 1.05-1.66) compared to cancer-free women. Race/ethnicity was a significant effect modifier in the association between being a survivor and seeing a mental health provider, with Hispanic survivors having the highest odds (aOR 3.44; 95% CI 2.06-5.74; p-interaction < 0.00). CONCLUSION Our study identifies disparities in healthcare utilization among female cancer survivors, highlighting the importance of evaluating these associations among medically underserved populations. These findings can educate healthcare professionals working with these populations to inform gaps in survivorship care utilization/access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate E. Dibble
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E6133, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Maneet Kaur
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Junrui Lyu
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Avonne E. Connor
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|