The experience of nutritional care according to patients with head and neck cancer involved with a combined dietitian, specialist nurse and speech pathologist clinic in a regional Australia: a qualitative longitudinal study

Systematic Review of Patient Preferences and Experiences Regarding Dietetic Outpatient Care

INTRODUCTION

Dietitians play a crucial role in delivering medical nutrition therapy in outpatient settings where overnight admission of patients is not required. Despite the increasing focus on value-based healthcare and patient-reported measures (PRMs), there have been no recent reports synthesising patient experiences of dietetic outpatient care. This study aims to synthesise existing literature on patient preferences and experiences of outpatient dietetic care and to provide updated guidance for dietitians to improve patient-centred care.

METHODS

A qualitative systematic review with meta-ethnography was conducted. The review included studies that reported patient experiences of dietetic care provided at outpatient settings detailed through focus groups, interviews, surveys or questionnaires, regardless of language, year or nationality. Participants' quotes and second-order concepts were extracted verbatim and synthesised. Main themes and sub-themes were then developed.

RESULTS

Five database searches yielded 5786 articles. After title and abstract screening and full-text review, 72 articles were included. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) the process of accessing and receiving dietetic care was problematic; (2) the delivery and content of dietetic advice were suboptimal at times and (3) personal attributes of the dietitian and a desire for speciality expertise influenced perceptions of the quality of dietetic care.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study provide actionable insights for dietitians to tailor their outpatient services by improving accessibility, refining the delivery of care and enhancing specialised expertise to meet individual patient needs and expectations effectively.

Exploring the lived experiences of adults using home enteral nutrition and their caregivers: A meta-aggregation qualitative systematic review

Home enteral nutrition (HEN) provides nutrition through a tube to individuals at home who cannot meet their needs by mouth. Systematic reviews have explored the experiences of HEN subpopulations, such as those with head and neck cancers. Given HEN services care for adults with various underlying conditions, a synthesis of the experiences of all adults using HEN and their caregivers is warranted. The purpose of this study is to summarize the experiences of HEN adult users and their caregivers regardless of underlying condition. Medline, PsychINFO, EmBase and CINAHL were systematically searched in January 2024. Studies with qualitative results and adult participants and focused on HEN were included. Studies with participants in nursing facilities, results using word counts, or not in English were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative checklist. Study design and participants' details were extracted. Themes were collated using the JBI meta-aggregative method. Forty studies (n = 732) were included. Three synthesized findings were identified: positive experiences (very low ConQual score), negative experiences (low ConQual score), and facilitators and coping mechanisms (moderate ConQual score). Although more negative than positive experiences were reported, users and caregivers who developed coping mechanisms or accessed supports viewed HEN as a worthwhile experience. Those with few supports or coping mechanisms did not. Based on this review, it is proposed that before starting HEN, users and caregivers should be made aware of the available supports and coping mechanisms. As negative experiences arise, healthcare providers should help users and caregivers access supports to improve their experiences.

Functional assessment of cancer therapy - head & neck (FACT-HN) translation and validation in Serbian

This study aimed to translate and validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head & Neck (FACT-HN) in a Serbian-speaking population, assessing its psychometric properties and utility in evaluating the quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. The research focuses on determining the translated questionnaire's reliability, validity, and cultural relevance. A total of 106 Serbian-speaking head and neck cancer patients completed the translated FACT-HN, along with other validated instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-HN43, CES-D, and GAD-7. The translation followed a standard internationally accepted procedure. Psychometric analyses were conducted using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, Pearson correlations, and reliability measures such as Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients. The Serbian version of the FACT-HN showed excellent internal consistency across all subscales, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.70 to 0.89. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the five-factor structure. Strong correlations were observed between the FACT-HN and other validated QoL measures, particularly with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-HN43. Convergent validity was satisfactory for all components except the Social Well-Being component. The Serbian version of the FACT-HN is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. It provides a comprehensive assessment of physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, making it valuable for clinical and research applications in Serbian-speaking populations. Further research is needed to assess its sensitivity to longitudinal treatment-related changes.

Understanding the complexity of barriers and facilitators to adherence to oral nutritional supplements among patients with malnutrition: a systematic mixed-studies review

The aim of this systematic mixed-studies review is to summarise barriers/facilitators to adherence to and/or consumption of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) among patients with disease-related malnutrition. In March 2022, the Cochrane CENTRAL, PUBMED, PsycINFO (Ovid) and CINAHL were searched for articles with various study designs, published since 2000. Articles were identified on the basis of 'population' (patients ≥18 years with malnutrition/at nutritional risk), 'intervention' (ONS with ≥2 macronutrients and micronutrients), 'comparison' (any comparator/no comparator) and 'outcome' (factors affecting adherence or consumption) criteria. A sequential exploratory synthesis was conducted: first, a thematic synthesis was performed identifying barriers/facilitators; and second, the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were used to support these findings. The five WHO dimensions of adherence guided the analysis. Study inclusion, data extraction, analysis and risk-of-bias assessment (MMAT 2018) were carried out independently by two researchers. From 21 835 screened articles, 171 were included with 42% RCTs and 20% qualitative studies. The two major populations were patients with malignancies (34%) and older adults (35%). In total, fifty-nine barriers/facilitators were identified. Patients' health status, motivation, product tolerance and satisfaction as well as well-functioning healthcare routines and support were factors impacting ONS consumption. Few barriers/facilitators (n = 13) were investigated in RCTs. Two of those were serving a small ONS volume and integrating ONS into ward routines. Given the complexity of ONS adherence, non-adherence to ONS should be addressed using a holistic approach. More studies are needed to investigate the effect of different approaches to increase adherence to ONS.

Survivorship Needs in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in Regional, Rural and Remote Areas: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Understanding survivorship issues among people with head and neck cancer (HNC) is important as survival rates increase. Most research has focused on urban patients, leaving a gap in understanding the challenges faced by those in rural areas. This study aims to summarise the literature on survivorship needs for people with HNC in rural areas.

METHODS

PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from database inception to 10 July 2024, with no restriction on publication period, country, or language. Data on study aims, country, methodology, and major findings related to HNC survivors in rural areas were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were qualitative, 11 were quantitative, and two adopted a mixed-methods approach. Results demonstrate the impact of complex treatments on physical (n = 13) and psychosocial (n = 14) functioning. This study also emphasises multifaceted challenges, including reduced access to specialised services, resulting in greater travel and financial burden, extending to caregivers. Hence, primary healthcare services are crucial in supporting these patients closer to home.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing the gaps in equitable post-treatment care requires an even distribution of healthcare funding and workforce in rural areas. Future research could target these issues to develop tailored interventions or models of care, such as shared care, to ease access and financial burden.

Experiences of cancer patients in receiving dietary advice from healthcare professionals and of healthcare professionals in providing this advice-a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review investigated qualitative and quantitative studies exploring patients and healthcare professionals' (HCP) experience of nutrition care throughout the cancer journey.

METHODS

Five databases were systematically searched for studies reporting on patient and healthcare professionals' experience of nutrition advice.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies including 374 patients and 471 healthcare professionals were included. Findings indicate that patients desire more specific nutrition advice supported by members of the multidisciplinary team and delivered in appropriate and understandable language. Healthcare professionals have highlighted a lack of time, funding, dietetic roles, and knowledge as barriers to integrating nutrition as a standard part of cancer care. Five themes were identified (current provision of nutrition advice, optimal provision of nutrition advice, tension between patient values and nutritional or HCP priorities, providing evidence-based nutrition care, and practical barriers to nutrition advice provision).

CONCLUSIONS

Further work is essential to better understand and address identified barriers and improve the provision of nutrition advice to this population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Findings from this review will guide the delivery of nutrition advice for cancer survivors.

Impact of various nutritional interventions on the physical and mental state of patients undergoing surgery for oral and maxillofacial tumor: guiding patients' informed choices

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS), parenteral nutrition (PN), and enteral nutrition (EN) on the recovery of patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery.

METHODS

The shared decision-making process assigned 37, 56, and 35 patients to the ONS, PN, and EN groups, respectively. Details such as demographic data, duration of hospitalization, cost of nutritional therapy, nutritional assessments, patients' satisfaction, and compliance, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) score, and relevant biochemical indices were systematically recorded and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Patients with healthier biochemical indices and physical states at baseline, including a higher body mass index, preferred ONS. Patients using dentures and those with medical insurance often chose EN, while patients with recurrent disease preferred PN. Patients receiving EN had a similar duration of hospitalization to patients receiving ONS and also had the lowest nutritional costs. Patients receiving ONS had higher lymphocyte counts and levels of hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein. Patients in the PN group had elevated levels of serum potassium, chlorine, and sodium, while those receiving EN reported higher HAM-A scores, indicating greater anxiety than their counterparts. Predischarge surveys showed higher satisfaction and compliance in the PN and ONS groups than in the EN group. The PN group reported more adverse symptoms. At 7 days post-discharge, patients with EN reported a greater feeling of well-being.

CONCLUSION

ONS is the optimal choice for patients in good preoperative conditions, while PN is preferred during disease recurrence or when financially feasible. EN is suitable for patients using dentures or those with limited finances despite its potential psychological discomfort. Future studies with increased sample sizes and longer follow-up duration are necessary to corroborate our findings. The Trial Registration Number is ChiCTR2100049547. The date of registration is August 2, 2021.

Preferences for oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: a discrete choice experiment

Purposes

Patients after gastrectomy have poor compliance with oral nutritional supplement (ONS) therapy. Incorporating patient preferences into treatment decisions allows possible product improvements or treatment focus adjustments. The purpose of this research was to investigate the preferences for ONS therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer, and to provide person-centered oral nutrition management strategies.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment was designed and implemented within a Chinese cancer population. The survey was administered via paper-based questionnaires during face-to-face interviews with assistance from health professionals. A mixed logit model was used to estimate respondents’ preferences for different levels of nutrition therapy attributes.

Results

One hundred ninety respondents valued “Adverse reactions-almost none” (β 3.43 [SE, 0.28]) the most, followed by “Flavor-good taste” (β 0.68 [SE, 0.13]) and “Follow-up frequency-once every 2 weeks” (β 0.52 [SE, 0.13]), and were willing to pay more for these attribute levels. Respondents would be 93.73% more likely to accept a nutrition therapy program if there were almost no adverse reactions compared to the frequent adverse reactions.

Conclusions

Health professionals should pay attention to the management and prevention of adverse reactions when prescribing nutritional products, and provide diversified ONS products when necessary to meet patient preferences. When formulating intervention strategies, health professionals should also consider the different characteristics of patients, acknowledge the importance of the role of nurse specialists in a novel model of multidisciplinary nutritional care, standardize ONS information, follow up regularly, and encourage patients’ families to participate in daily nutrition care.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07154-8.