A prospective multi-centre, randomized study comparing the addition of tapering dexamethasone to other standard of care therapies for taxane-associated pain syndrome (TAPS) in breast cancer patients

Taxane-Associated Acute Pain Syndrome: a Review of its Features and Management

OPINION STATEMENT

Taxane-associated acute pain syndrome (T-APS) is one of the most common adverse effects of taxane treatment and significantly reduces the quality of life and activities of daily living of patients. T-APS is recognized as myalgia and arthralgia, which generally appear 1-3 days after taxane administration and last for approximately 7 days, at a wide range of sites. Recently, T-APS has been suggested to be not only an acute symptom but also a chronic symptom associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The reported incidence of T-APS varies among studies, possibly owing to differences in observation points, evaluation methods, taxane administration methods, concomitant medications, or patient factors. Several factors, such as high taxane dose, paclitaxel use, metastatic setting, breast cancer, younger age, and co-administration of pegfilgrastim, are associated with symptom development. Several findings regarding T-APS management, such as prophylaxis using corticosteroids, Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are present. Corticosteroids for several days after taxane administration dose-dependently prevents and attenuates T-APS although we should be cautious about its longer administration. Prophylactic administration of Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to, a herbal compound, may be useful, although prescriptions are only available in limited areas. Etoricoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibiting NSAID, also reduces the incidence and severity of T-APS. Additionally, its prophylactic administration decreases CIPN. In contrast, evidence of symptomatic medication is limited. Taxanes are key chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of several types of cancer; therefore, further assessment of mechanisms of action and treatment of T-APS is necessary.

Quantitation of Plasma Proteins to Predict Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

PURPOSE

Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel in patients with cancer. TIPN prediction is challenging although patients with higher systemic paclitaxel exposure have higher TIPN risk. This study aimed to identify protein predictors of TIPN and paclitaxel pharmacokinetics (PK).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective study of females with early-stage breast cancer receiving weekly paclitaxel. TIPN was assessed using the sensory subscale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)20 (CIPN8). A blood sample was collected within 10 minutes before the end of the first paclitaxel infusion to measure plasma proteins using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and to estimate maximum systemic paclitaxel concentration (Cmax). A second sample was collected approximately 24 hours after the first infusion to estimate paclitaxel time above threshold (Tc>0.05). Linear mixed-effect and regression models were used to identify proteins predictive of TIPN and paclitaxel PK parameters, respectively, using a Bonferroni-adjusted α = .0006.

RESULTS

Data from 36 participants were included in the analysis testing associations of 83 proteins with TIPN or PK. Higher levels of complement C3 were associated with more severe TIPN trajectories (P = .0002). No proteins were associated with either Cmax or Tc>0.05 (all P > .0006).

CONCLUSION

Complement C3 concentration at the end of initial paclitaxel infusion may be useful for identifying patients with breast cancer and potentially other tumor types who could benefit from TIPN prevention strategies to improve long-term treatment outcomes.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Oral Dexamethasone in Combination With Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab Therapy for Previously Treated Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Docetaxel plus ramucirumab (DTX + RAM) therapy is a standard treatment for previously treated lung cancer, but many adverse events have been reported. This retrospective study was conducted to examine if the side effects of DTX + RAM therapy can be minimized by the combined use of oral dexamethasone (DEX), and to assess the therapeutic effect of DTX + RAM in patients with recurrent lung cancer.

METHODS

Forty patients with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer who underwent DTX + RAM therapy were divided into two groups based on the concomitant use of oral DEX, and the therapeutic effects and toxicities in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly better in the DEX group (P = 0.0203). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.20 months vs 2.87 months (P = 0.064) in the DEX and non-DEX groups, respectively. However, the median overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the DEX group (15.17 months vs 7.37 months, P = 0.0317). The frequency of fluid retention within six months of the start of treatment was 10.0% vs 42.5% in the DEX and non-DEX groups, respectively, with the fluid retention rate being significantly higher in the non-DEX group (P = 0.039).Conclusion: Concomitant use of oral DEX during DTX + RAM therapy may facilitate the long-term continuation of treatment and contribute to OS prolongation.

The Immunomodulatory Effects of Dexamethasone on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The immunomodulatory impact of corticosteroids and concurrent chemotherapy is poorly understood within triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). On a biochemical level, steroids have been linked to the signaling of chemotherapy-resistant pathways. However, on a clinical level, steroids play an essential role in chemotherapy tolerance through the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and hypersensitivity reactions. Given these conflicting roles, we wanted to evaluate this interplay more rigorously in the context of early-stage TNBC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with operable TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between January 2012 and November 2018, with the primary goal of examining the dose-dependent relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) rates and corticosteroid use. Secondary endpoints included the impact of steroid dosing on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), along with a breakdown in pCR rates based on steroid doses provided during each chemotherapy phase. Further adjusted analyses were performed based on patient age, diabetic status, and anatomical stage. Finally, we explored the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) seen on tissue samples at baseline and dexamethasone doses in terms of pCR rates.

RESULTS

In total, of the 174 patients screened within this study period, 116 met full eligibility criteria. Of these eligible patients, all were female, with a median age of 51.5 years (27.0 to 74.0) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.04]. The majority were nondiabetic (80.2%). For cancer stage, 69.8% (n = 81) had stage 2 breast cancer. We found no statistically significant association between pCR rates and dexamethasone use, both in terms of the total dose (p = 0.55) and mean dose per NAC cycle (p = 0.74). Similarly, no difference was noted when adjusting for diabetic status, metformin use, or age at diagnosis, regardless of the total steroid dose provided (p = 0.72) or mean dose per cycle (p = 0.49). No meaningful changes to pCR rate were seen with higher mean or higher total steroid doses during the paclitaxel (T) phase (adjusted p = 0.16 and p = 0.76, respectively) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) phase (adjusted p = 0.83 and p = 0.77, respectively). Furthermore, we found no clinically significant association between dexamethasone dose and either RFS (p = 0.45) or OS (p = 0.89). Of the 56 patients who had available pre-treatment biopsy tissue samples, 27 achieved pCR, with higher TILs at baseline being associated with higher pCR rates, regardless of the mean dexamethasone dose used.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has no clinically significant impact on pCR, RFS, or OS when given concurrently with NAC in patients with curative TNBC, regardless of diabetic status.

Integrating Systematic Reviews into Supportive Care Trial Design: The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program

PURPOSE

To review the successes and challenges of integrating systematic reviews (SRs) into the Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program.

METHODS

All REaCT program SRs were evaluated and descriptive summaries presented.

RESULTS

Twenty-two SRs have been performed evaluating standard of care interventions for the management of: breast cancer (n = 15), all tumour sites (n = 4), breast and prostate cancers (n = 2), and prostate cancer (n = 1). The majority of SRs were related to supportive care (n = 14) and survivorship (n = 5) interventions and most (19/22, 86%) confirmed the existence of uncertainty relating to the clinical question addressed in the SR. Most SRs (15/22, 68%) provided specific recommendations for future studies and results were incorporated into peer-reviewed grant applications (n = 6) and clinical trial design (n = 12). In 12/22 of the SRs, the first author was a trainee. All SRs followed PRISMA guidelines.

CONCLUSION

SRs are important for identifying and confirming clinical equipoise and designing trials. SRs provide an excellent opportunity for trainees to participate in research.

Corticosteroids in oncology: use, overuse, indications, contraindications. An Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)/ Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD)/ Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE)/ Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) multidisciplinary consensus position paper

Corticosteroids (CSs) are widely used in oncology, presenting several different indications. They are useful for induction of apoptosis in hematological neoplasms, for management of anaphylaxis and cytokine release/hypersensitivity reaction and for the symptomatic treatment of many tumour- and treatment-related complications. If the employment of CSs in the oncological setting results in several benefits for patients and satisfaction for clinicians, on the other hand, many potential adverse events (AEs), both during treatment and after withdrawal of CSs, as well as the duality of the effects of these compounds in oncology, recommend being cautious in clinical practice. To date, several gray zones remain about indications, contraindications, dose, and duration of treatment. In this article, a panel of experts provides a critical review on CSs therapy in oncology, focusing on mechanisms of action and pharmacological characteristics, current and emerging therapeutic indications/contraindications, AEs related to CSs treatment, and the impact on patient outcome.

The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program. A Canadian-Led Pragmatic Trials Program: Strategies for Integrating Knowledge Users into Trial Design

We reviewed patient and health care provider (HCP) surveys performed through the REaCT program. The REaCT team has performed 15 patient surveys (2298 respondents) and 13 HCP surveys (1033 respondents) that have addressed a broad range of topics in breast cancer management. Over time, the proportion of surveys distributed by paper/regular mail has fallen, with electronic distribution now the norm. For the patient surveys, the median duration of the surveys was 3 months (IQR 2.5-7 months) and the median response rate was 84% (IQR 80-91.7%). For the HCP surveys, the median survey duration was 3 months (IQR 1.75-4 months), and the median response rate, where available, was 28% (IQR 21.2-49%). The survey data have so far led to: 10 systematic reviews, 6 peer-reviewed grant applications and 19 clinical trials. Knowledge users should be an essential component of clinical research. The REaCT program has integrated surveys as a standard step of their trials process. The COVID-19 pandemic and reduced face-to-face interactions with patients in the clinic as well as the continued importance of social media highlight the need for alternative means of distributing and responding to surveys.