Uncertainty and the unmet informational needs of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP): a cross-sectional multi-site study

The evolution of molecular management of carcinoma of unknown primary

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is significant need to improve diagnostic and therapeutic options for patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). In this review, we discuss the evolving landscape of molecular profiling in CUP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular profiling is becoming accepted into the diagnostic work-up of CUP patients with tumour mutation profiling now described in international CUP guidelines. Although tissue-of-origin (ToO) molecular tests utilising gene-expression and DNA methylation have existed some time, their clinical benefit remains unclear. Novel technologies utilising whole genome sequencing and machine learning algorithms are showing promise in determining ToO, however further research is required prior to clinical application. A recent international clinical trial found patients treated with molecularly-guided therapy based on comprehensive-panel DNA sequencing had improved progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone, confirming utility of performing genomic profiling early in the patient journey. Small phase 2 trials have demonstrated that some CUP patients are responsive to immunotherapy, but the best way to select patients for treatment is not clear.

SUMMARY

Management of CUP requires a multifaceted approach incorporating clinical, histopathological, radiological and molecular sequencing results to assist with identifying the likely ToO and clinically actionable genomic alternations. Rapidly identifying a subset of CUP patients who are likely to benefit from site specific therapy, targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy will improve patient outcomes.

Factors influencing the supportive care needs of female patients with genital cancer in South Korea

Genital cancers are particularly important compared to other cancers because of the psychological impact they have on the individual. This study investigated the complexity in illness and quality of life among female genital cancer patients and determined the effects of these factors on supportive care needs to provide evidential data for the development of nursing intervention strategies to reduce supportive care needs in female genital cancer patients. This cross-sectional study collected data from July 22 to August 17, 2021. The study subjects were 103 female outpatients and inpatients aged 19 years or older who were treated for cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, or other female genital cancers such as vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer in a university hospital in Korea. The data were analyzed with t-tests and Scheffé's test using SPSS 26.0. The factors affecting supportive care needs were examined using hierarchical regression. The average age of the subjects was 56.41 (±9.91) years. Cervical cancer was the most common diagnosis at 42.7%, followed by ovarian cancer at 34.0%, and endometrial cancer at 21.4%. The factors affecting supportive care needs included a middle school education or below (β = 0.21, P = .028), unemployment (β = 0.23, P = .018), complexity in illness (β = 0.32, P < .001), and quality of life (β = -0.68, P < .001). Developing a strategy for managing the complexity in illness and quality of life caused by various variables including disease stage and type of treatment is necessary to reduce the supportive care needs of female genital cancer patients. Improving their quality of life through effective communication with healthcare providers is essential.

Exploring the experience of meaning-centered group psychotherapy among Chinese cancer patients during active treatment: a descriptive qualitative study

Objective

Meaninglessness poses a significant psychological challenge for cancer patients, negatively affecting their quality of life and increasing the risk of suicide. Meaning-Centered Group Therapy (MCGP) is an intervention designed specifically to enhance the meaning of life of cancer patients. Extensive research has documented its effectiveness across various cultures and populations. However, limited research has been conducted on the subjective experiences and perspectives of participants engaged in MCGP. Thus, the purpose of this study was to employ a qualitative design to explore the experiences and viewpoints of Chinese cancer patients who have undergone MCGP.

Methods

Within a two-week timeframe following the conclusion of MCGP, semi-structured interviews were administered to twenty-one participants who had engaged in the therapy. The interview data were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis.

Results

Four main themes were identified: (a) Self-perceived personal change, (b) Overall experience of group therapy, (c) Barriers to participation of MCGP, and (d) Suggestions for future interventions.

Conclusion

Despite the barriers to participation in the MCGP process, the overall experience for Chinese cancer patients undergoing active treatment is valuable and positive, providing multiple benefits. Future studies could explore the adaptation of MCGP to a broader range of cancer populations and diverse study populations.

Current status and influencing factors of participating satisfaction during surgical treatment decision-making among breast cancer patients with immediate breast reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Breast reconstruction (BR) is a positive contribution to aesthetic effect among breast cancer patients. Identification of influenced factors for participating satisfaction may provide insights on the decision-making theory to promote patient's autonomy in surgical choice. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of participating satisfaction with surgical treatment decision-making and its predictors among breast cancer patients with immediate BR.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted including 163 breast cancer patients with immediate BR in Mainland China. Data was collected using patients' participation satisfaction in medical decision-making scale (PSMDS), Big five Short-Form (BFI) Scale, Patient Participation Competence Scale(PPCS) and Patients' Preference (MPP) scale. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

Scores of PSMD were 86.38 ± 15.74. Multiple regression analyses indicated autonomous decision-making, marital statue, information acquisition competence, agreeableness, and decision-making preferences as indicators, explaining 29.6% of the response variation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The level of PSMD in breast cancer patients with immediate BR need to be improved. Patients with greater autonomous decision-making, married, higher information acquisition competence, agreeableness, and collaborative role are more likely to have an preferable PSMD. A comprehensive assessment and effective decision-making support are needed initially for BC patients to promote positive participation when making surgical decision.