Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk of stroke among patients with cancer is two times that of the general population due to a combination of cancer-, chemotherapy-, radiotherapy-, and surgery-related factors. There is a paucity of data regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to review the stroke recurrence in patients treated with different antithrombotic therapies (antiplatelets, warfarin, heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants). Our secondary objective was to review the bleeding risk across different antithrombotic therapies.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles that adequately assessed secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cancer were selected from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception until March 2, 2025. We performed a network meta-analysis for stroke recurrence, major bleeding, and mortality. The treatments were ranked by P-SCORE. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on median D-dimer levels, multiple territories of stroke, and exclusion of studies with high risk of bias.

RESULTS

We included 11 studies (four RCTs, six retrospective studies, and one case series) with a total of 1319 patients. In the primary analysis, antiplatelets were the highest-ranked treatment for reducing stroke recurrence (RR 0.44 [0.20; 0.96]), followed by LMWH (RR 0.50 [0.26; 0.96]), both significantly superior to no treatment. However, LMWH consistently ranked higher than antiplatelets in all subgroup analyses. There was no difference regarding major bleeding or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelets can be considered an option for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cancer, especially in patients with a higher bleeding risk. Future research with high-quality studies is needed to confirm our preliminary findings and should focus on identifying subgroups of patients with cancer who may benefit most from specific antithrombotic therapies.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Edoxaban in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a medical condition characterized by forming a blood clot, or thrombus, in one of the deep veins, typically in the legs. It is a type of venous thromboembolism, which refers to the formation of blood clots in the veins. It is caused by Virchow's triad (stasis, hypercoagulation, and endothelial injury).

OBJECTIVE

Our main objective is to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and edoxaban in treating lower extremity DVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving 406 patients subjected to DVT treatment using direct oral anticoagulants (edoxaban and rivaroxaban) at our hospital. We recruited adult patients (aged 18 years and more) diagnosed with lower extremity DVT and received treatment with either rivaroxaban or edoxaban as the primary anticoagulant therapy for DVT. We excluded patients who received treatment with other anticoagulant medications (warfarin and heparin) as the primary therapy for DVT.

RESULTS

The groups showed statistically significant differences in red blood cell count and hemoglobin levels, with the edoxaban group having high values. However, the 2 groups observed no statistically significant differences in creatinine clearance, white blood cell count, platelet count, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels. The difference in the incidence of pulmonary embolism between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). The edoxaban group had fewer pulmonary embolism patients than the rivaroxaban group. The reduction in recurrent thrombosis was significantly higher in the rivaroxaban group compared to the edoxaban group. There were no significant differences in the major bleeding at various sites across the 2 treatment groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetic profile includes rapid absorption and a relatively short half-life. It means that once administered, rivaroxaban quickly reaches its peak concentration in the blood and is subsequently eliminated from the body within a relatively short period. Edoxaban's pharmacokinetic profile may include slower absorption and a longer half-life than rivaroxaban. It can result in a slower rate of achieving peak concentration and a more prolonged presence in the bloodstream. These results emphasize the need for careful consideration of anticoagulant therapy in patients with underlying cancer and underscore the importance of managing risks while providing adequate anticoagulation to prevent thrombotic events.

Edoxaban, Rivaroxaban, or Apixaban for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in the Real World: Insights from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2

BACKGROUND

 Real-world data on clinical characteristics and outcomes related to the use of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is lacking.

METHODS

 The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE from 31 centers in Japan from January 2015 to August 2020. Our study population comprised 1,197 patients with active cancer who were divided into the edoxaban (N = 643, 54%), rivaroxaban (N = 297, 25%), and apixaban (N = 257, 22%) groups.

RESULTS

 The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE (9.3, 10.2, and 8.5%, respectively, p = 0.82) and all-cause death (67.5, 66.8, and 63.8%, respectively, p = 0.22) did not differ among the groups. Despite adjusting for confounders, the risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the groups. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group than those in the other groups (22.6, 14.0, and 22.8%, p = 0.04; and 37.6, 26.8, and 38.3%, p = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, in the rivaroxaban group, the risk for major bleeding was numerically lower (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.01) and that of clinically relevant all bleeding was significantly lower (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.92) than those in the edoxaban group.

CONCLUSION

 The risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the different DOACs ; however, the risk of bleeding events could differ, with a potentially lower risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban.

Validation of the Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban as Postoperative Thromboembolism Prophylaxis for Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism is a preventable complication of gynecologic cancer surgery that leads to postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study compared apixaban with enoxaparin to identify whether apixaban had the same safety and efficacy for patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.

METHODS

The study identified patients with a gynecologic malignancy who underwent surgery and were prescribed apixaban at discharge between June 2020 and April 2023. International Classification of Diseases 10 codes were used to identify patients who had a thromboembolism within 90 days or a bleeding event within 60 days after surgery. The rates of events for patients prescribed apixaban were compared with those for a historical cohort of patients who received enoxaparin. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and t tests were used to compare continuous variables. A logistic regression was performed to compare the odds of thromboembolism between the two groups.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics differed in terms of body mass index (BMI), race, route of surgery, and type of cancer. Of the 490 patients in the apixaban cohort, 12 (2.4%) had a thromboembolism compared with 3 (2.1%) of the 138 patients in the enoxaparin group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-4.70; p > 0.999). The odds ratio was adjusted for BMI, age, and route of surgery. A bleeding event occurred for 1 (0.2%) of the 490 patients in the apixaban group and for 1 (0.7%) of the 138 patients in the enoxaparin group.

CONCLUSIONS

This validation study showed that apixaban is a safe and effective method of postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. The data provide support to previous data and guideline updates recommending the use of apixaban for postoperative prophylaxis.

Apixaban versus low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The optimal treatment regimen for patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) remains unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of (VKAs) versus direct apixaban and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CA-VTE.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the efficacy and safety of apixaban and LMWH in patients with CA-VTE. Major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and bleeding-related mortality were among outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs.

Results

The analysis included 12 011 patients from 3 RCTs and 2 observational studies. Compared to LMWH, apixaban significantly decreased the risk of major bleeding [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.54, 0.83); P=0.0003, I2=0%] without significantly changing the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding [RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.64, 0.1.45); P=0.85, I2=57%]. Patients on apixaban had a noticeably reduced the risk of recurrence of PE than those taking LMWH, according to a meta-analysis [RR 0.56 (95% CI 0.32, 0.99); P=0.05, I2=0%]. There was no discernible difference between apixaban and LMWH in bleeding-related mortality events [RR 0.20 (95% CI 0.01, 4.18); P=0.30, I2=NA%], and recurrence of DVT [RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.22, 1.59); P=0.23, I2=32%].

Conclusion

Due to its lower risk of severe bleeding and reduced PE recurrence, apixaban may be a preferable treatment option for CA-VTE, but additional research is required to validate these conclusions and evaluate its long-term efficacy and safety.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with malignant central nervous system neoplasm: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Central nervous system (CNS) malignant neoplasms may lead to venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding, which result in rehospitalization, morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the incidence of VTE and bleeding in this population.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023423949) were based on a standardized search of PubMed, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane (n = 1653) in July 2023. After duplicate removal, data screening and collection were conducted by independent reviewers. The combined rates and 95% confidence intervals for the incidence of VTE and bleeding were calculated using the random effects model with double arcsine transformation. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex, age, income, and type of tumor. Heterogeneity was calculated using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Egger's test and funnel graphs were used to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

Only 36 studies were included, mainly retrospective cohorts (n = 30, 83.3%) from North America (n = 20). Most studies included were published in high-income countries. The sample size of studies varied between 34 and 21,384 adult patients, mostly based on gliomas (n = 30,045). For overall malignant primary CNS neoplasm, the pooled incidence was 13.68% (95%CI 9.79; 18.79) and 11.60% (95%CI 6.16; 18.41) for VTE and bleeding, respectively. The subgroup with elderly people aged 60 or over had the highest incidence of VTE (32.27% - 95%CI 14.40;53.31). The studies presented few biases, being mostly high quality. Despite some variability among the studies, we observed consistent results by performing sensitivity analysis, which highlight the robustness of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed variability in the pooled incidence for both overall events and subgroup analyses. It was highlighted that individuals over 60 years old or diagnosed with GBM had a higher pooled incidence of VTE among those with overall CNS malignancies. It is important to note that the results of this meta-analysis refer mainly to studies carried out in high-income countries. This highlights the need for additional research in Latin America, and low- and middle-income countries.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism is associated with significant patient morbidity, mortality, and can lead to delays in treatment for patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify the incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of biomedical databases, including Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase was performed on December 6, 2022 and updated on December 21, 2023 for peer reviewed articles. Studies were included if they were cohort studies or randomized controlled trials that evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results across studies.

RESULTS

A total of 2636 studies were screened, and 11 were included in the review. Ten were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the included studies ranged from 0% to 18.9%. The pooled incidence rate of venous thromboembolism was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 13%). This remained significant when restricted to only studies with a low risk of bias (pooled incidence of 11%, 95% CI 9% to 14%). Body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 was a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism with a pooled odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.76) CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study demonstrated a 10% incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This suggests that there may be a role for universal thromboprophylaxis in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022339602.