Feasibility and pilot testing of a personalized eHealth intervention for pain science education and self-management for breast cancer survivors with persistent pain: a mixed-method study

A prediction model for moderate to severe pain in primary hepatic carcinoma after chemotherapy: a multi-center prospective case‒control study

The incidence of moderate to severe pain after chemotherapy with primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) patients is high. Although standardized treatment can effectively relieve pain, the control effect is poor. More attention should be paid to the prevention of pain at the beginning of symptoms, so as to reduce the incidence of pain and promote the health of patients. However, there are lack of a prospective design to predict pain before it occurs. The study is a prospective case‒control study. Population was PHC patients who received chemotherapy from April to August to 2024 in three grade 3 and first-class hospital. Data were collected in two periods (on the day of admission and within 24 h of chemotherapy). According to the Brief Pain Inventory, the patients were divided into case group and control group. Then the patients were randomly divided into a training group and an internal validation group at a 2:1 ratio. Single-factor logistics regression was used to analyze the risk factors, and the back-propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN) model was constructed and verified. A total of 467 patients consisting of 312 training samples and 155 validation samples. BP-ANN model showed the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of prediction were 0.808, 70.6%, 81.7%, 93%, respectively. Internal verification also indicated these indicators were 0.783, 78.8%, 70.8%, and 94.2%, respectively. Significant predictors identified were age > 57.5, BMI > 19.9, symptoms of insomnia prior to illness, worker, Renvastinib, Child-Pugh = B, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase, other platinum drugs, cancer staging of IV, ECOG = 2, NRS-2002 = 3, Oxaliplatin, and Donafenib. The BP-ANN model holds high predictive value for the moderate to severe pain of PHC patients after chemotherapy. In the future, the model can be further visualized to facilitate clinical screening and to provide a basis for subsequent intervention.

Investigating the Analgesic Mechanisms of Acupuncture for Cancer Pain: Insights From Multimodal Bioelectrical Signal Analysis

Purpose

Cancer pain management remains a significant clinical challenge. While acupuncture has shown potential in alleviating cancer pain, its underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. This study investigates the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying acupuncture's analgesic effects using multimodal bioelectrical signal analysis.

Patients and Methods

Fifteen cancer pain patients underwent acupuncture while wearing portable, multi-sensor devices to capture bioelectrical signals. Pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before and during needle retention. Neurophysiological changes were evaluated using Principal Component Analysis, Joint Time-Frequency Analysis, power spectrum analysis, spectral analysis, and dynamic functional network analysis.

Results

There was a significant reduction in NRS scores from pre-treatment to the retention period, indicating pain relief. Principal component analysis showed significant differences in bioelectrical signals between these periods. Power spectrum analysis revealed decreased signal power during retention. Functional network analysis demonstrated a reduction in connectivity strength between electroencephalography and electromyography signals. Spectral analysis identified distinct real-time and staged characteristics of bioelectrical signals, with correlation analysis confirming a positive relationship between NRS score changes and bioelectrical signal alterations.

Conclusion

Acupuncture alleviates cancer pain by reducing functional connectivity between injured tissues and the brain, with immediate effects. Prolonging needle retention may enhance therapeutic outcomes. These findings provide new insights into the neurophysiological basis of acupuncture's analgesic effects, supporting its role in cancer pain management.

Patients' Experiences of Digital Health Interventions for the Self-Management of Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

BACKGROUND

Research regarding the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) for people living with chronic pain is widely documented, although it is often measured against changes in clinical outcomes. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the full impact of DHIs, it is vital to understand the experience of individuals who are using them. An exploration of qualitative data regarding the experience of people living with chronic pain engaging with DHIs could provide a more in-depth account of how individuals interact and engage with such tools, uncovering the overall impact DHIs can have on the lives of people living with chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis aimed to appraise and synthesize relevant qualitative evidence on patients' experiences of engaging with DHIs for the self-management of chronic pain symptoms.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of qualitative and mixed methods studies published between 2013 and 2023 was conducted across 6 databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Eligible studies included adult patients aged ≥18 years with a chronic pain diagnosis (ie, >12 weeks) reporting on the experience of engaging in a DHI for the self-management of chronic pain. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist for qualitative research was used to appraise each study. Following a 3-step inductive thematic synthesis approach, the researcher performed line-by-line coding of each eligible article to identify descriptive themes. Through iterative evaluation of the descriptive themes, analytical themes that facilitated a deeper understanding of the data were derived.

RESULTS

In total, 37 qualitative and mixed methods studies were included in the review. Thematic synthesis revealed three overarching themes encompassing five subthemes: (1) personal growth, with 2 subthemes (gaining new insights and renewed mindset); (2) active involvement, with 3 subthemes (motivation, improved access, and health care decision-making); and (3) connectedness and support.

CONCLUSIONS

A positive experience with DHIs among people living with chronic pain is achieved through an improved understanding of their condition, greater self-awareness of how symptoms impact their lives, and an increase in motivation to play an active role in their health care. DHIs promote the confidence and independence of people living with chronic pain, as well as facilitate a sense of ongoing support between routine appointments. However, DHIs may disempower people living with chronic pain by placing too much focus on their pain and should be used as an adjunct to existing care as opposed to replacing in-person appointments. To appropriately meet the needs of people living with chronic pain, the content and features of DHIs should be personalized. Development of future DHIs should use a co-design approach involving key stakeholders to ensure the needs of people living with chronic pain are met.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023445100; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023445100.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/52469.

Feasibility of a comprehensive supervised exercise program during and after treatment of head and neck cancer: a mixed-methods study

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the feasibility of a comprehensive supervised exercise program (CSEP) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients during and after (chemo)radiotherapy, integrating quantitative and qualitative data to identify participation barriers and facilitators.

METHODS

To investigate the feasibility of the CSEP, a mixed-method study was performed. For the quantitative part, first, adherence to and safety of the CSEP were considered as quantitative feasibility outcome measures. Second, two questionnaires evaluated acceptability, adherence, feasibility, therapeutic support, and overall evaluation at 12 weeks and 6 months after the start of the radiotherapy. Additionally, focus groups were held to discuss acceptability, adherence, expectations, feasibility, therapeutic support, and overall evaluation. The quantitative and qualitative data were integrated and discussed via a joint display table.

RESULTS

Quantitative data were available from 32 participants. Three focus groups with in total 11 participants were organized. Overall adherence to the CSEP was 72%, and no serious adverse events were reported, confirming the program's safety. Adherence and feasibility posed challenges; hospital sessions had higher adherence due to better motivation and guidance, whereas home sessions faced issues like lack of motivation and time constraints. Participants highlighted the program's individualization as a significant strength.

CONCLUSION

The CSEP was positively received, deemed safe, and feasible during and after HNC treatment, with participants recommending it to other HNC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05256238 (Registered on February 25, 2022).

Unraveling impact and potential mechanisms of baseline pain on efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients: a retrospective and bioinformatic analysis

Objective

Pain is a prevalent discomfort symptom associated with cancer, yet the correlations and potential mechanisms between pain and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy remain uncertain.

Methods

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the inpatient department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, were retrospectively enrolled. Through cox regression analysis, prognostic factors and independent prognostic factors affecting the efficacy of ICIs were identified, and a nomogram model was constructed. Hub cancer-related pain genes (CRPGs) were identified through bioinformatic analysis. Finally, the expression levels of hub CRPGs were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results

Before PSM, a total of 222 patients were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate cox analysis indicated that bone metastasis and NRS scores were independent prognostic factors for the efficacy of ICIs. After PSM, a total of 94 people were enrolled in this study. Univariate cox analysis and multivariate cox analysis indicated that age, platelets, Dnlr, liver metastasis, bone metastasis, and NRS scores were independent prognostic factors for the efficacy of ICIs. A nomogram was constructed based on 6 independent prognostic factors with AUC values of 0.80 for 1-year, 0.73 for 2-year, and 0.80 for 3-year survival. ELISA assay results indicated that the level of CXCL12 significantly decreased compared to baseline after pain was relieved.

Conclusion

Baseline pain is an independent prognostic factor affecting the efficacy of ICIs in lung cancer, potentially through CXCL12-mediated inflammation promotion and immunosuppression.

Current status and hotspots in breast cancer patient self-management research: A bibliometric and visual analysis via CiteSpace

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Patient self-management plays a pivotal role in enhancing outcomes and quality of life for individuals affected by this disease. This study employed bibliometric and visual analysis techniques utilizing CiteSpace to elucidate the current status and research hotspots in breast cancer patient self-management from January 1, 2005, to August 31, 2023.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The retrieved literature was subjected to visualization and analysis using CiteSpace, focusing on publication timeline, article count, geographical distribution, institutional affiliations, journal sources, reference co-citation networks, and keyword analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis encompassed 1413 English-language documents. The United States emerged as the most prolific contributor, while the University of Toronto demonstrated the highest institutional output. The two-map overlay revealed prominent citation paths, indicating strong interconnections between publications in "Medicine, Medicine, Clinical" and "Health, Nursing, Medicine," as well as "Psychology, Education, Health" and "Health, Nursing, Medicine." The most frequently co-cited reference was "Self-Management: Enabling and Empowering Patients Living with Cancer as a Chronic Illness." High-frequency keywords identified included quality of life, chronic disease, self-management, patient education, randomized controlled trials, education, and intervention. These keywords formed 11 distinct clusters related to intervention content, methodologies, outcome indicators, and emerging research trends. Keyword burst analysis predicted future research hotspots focusing on patient needs, psychological distress, Internet technology, and mobile applications.

CONCLUSIONS

Research in breast cancer self-management is experiencing significant growth. Enhanced collaboration between countries, regions, and institutions is imperative. Further investigation is warranted, particularly in the domains of "quality of life," "patient education," and "mobile health." These findings provide valuable insights to guide future research directions in this critical field.

Empowering beyond Pain: Pain Neuroscience Education Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivorship Care

Chronic pain is a common consequence of breast cancer (BC) and its treatments. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a non-pharmacological intervention that adopts a biopsychosocial approach and has already been proven to be effective for different chronic pain syndromes. The present review aims to critically assess clinical trials comparing the efficacy of PNE to traditional biomedical education (BME) in reducing BC-related pain and improving quality of life. We conducted a literature search in scientific databases, including all studies regarding PNE use specifically for BC-related pain. Ongoing randomized controlled and observational studies were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov and congress proceedings. A total of eight clinical trials met the review criteria. The participants were all administered physical therapy and assigned to receive either BME or PNE interventions. Among the completed clinical studies, one reported no statistically relevant differences between the two groups, whereas the other showed lower levels of pain-related indexes in the PNE population compared to the BME one. While the current literature is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of PNE for managing BC pain, we strongly support the need for further trials, as PNE could empower BC patients in both prevention of and coping with pain, offering the advantage of having no side effects.

Empowerment, Pain Control, and Quality of Life Improvement in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients through Pain Neuroscience Education: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study Protocol (EMPOWER Trial)

The treatment of early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) has improved patients' prognosis but often leads to adverse events and sequelae affecting quality of life (QoL). Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is a promising non-pharmacological intervention in this field. Preliminary data have shown the beneficial effect of PNE in BC survivors. However, there are still gaps in knowledge regarding its optimal use in eTNBC. To address this issue, a prospective pilot study will enroll 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with eTNBC at IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital. The PNE program will consist of 10 weekly sessions to be started within 4 weeks of the onset or worsening of a pain syndrome (PS). QoL, pain, and disability will be assessed before, during, at the end of, and 6 months after PNE using validated questionnaires. Peripheral venous blood samples will be taken before and at the end of PNE to evaluate inflammatory serum biomarker levels. The primary objective is to evaluate whether PNE leads to clinical improvement in QoL and pain. If successful, it will be validated in a larger multi-centric cohort, potentially leading to its widespread implementation as a standard pain management tool for eTNBC patients.

Investigating the risk factors for nonadherence to analgesic medications in cancer patients: Establishing a nomogram model

Objective

The substantial prevalence of nonadherence to analgesic medication among individuals diagnosed with cancer imposes a significant strain on both patients and healthcare resources. The objective of this study is to develop and authenticate a nomogram model for assessing nonadherence to analgesic medication in cancer patients.

Methods

Clinical information, demographic data, and medication adherence records of cancer pain patients were gathered from the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University between April 2020 and March 2023. The risk factors associated with analgesic medication nonadherence in cancer patients were analyzed using the least absolute selection operator (LASSO) regression model and multivariate logistic regression. Additionally, a nomogram model was developed. The bootstrap method was employed to internally verify the model. Discrimination and accuracy of the nomogram model were evaluated using the Concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver Operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and calibration curve. The potential clinical value of the nomogram model was established through decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve.

Results

The study included a total of 450 patients, with a nonadherence rate of 43.33%. The model incorporated seven factors: age, address, smoking history, number of comorbidities, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), use of opioids, and PHQ-8. The C-index of the model was found to be 0.93 (95% CI: 0.907-0.953), and the ROC curve demonstrated an AUC of 0.929. Furthermore, the DCA and clinical impact curves indicate that the built model can accurately predict cancer pain patients' medication adherence performance.

Conclusions

A nomogram model based on 7 risk factors has been successfully developed and validated for long-term analgesic management of cancer patients.

Managing chronic pain after breast cancer treatments: are web-based interventions the future?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Chronic post-treatment pain in breast cancer affects a high proportion of patients. Symptom burden and financial costs are increasingly impacting patients and healthcare systems because of improved treatments and survival rates. Supporting long-term breast cancer symptoms using novel methodology has been examined, yet few have explored the opportunity to utilise these interventions for prevention. This review aims to explore the need for, range of, and effectiveness of such interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three papers describe risk factors for chronic pain, with six recent papers describing the use of interventions for acute pain in the surgical setting. The evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions to improve pain management in this setting is limited but tentatively positive. The results have to take into account the variation between systems and limited testing.

SUMMARY

Multiple types of intervention emerged and appear well accepted by patients. Most assessed short-term impact and did not evaluate for reduction in chronic pain. Such interventions require rigorous effectiveness testing to meet the growing needs of post-treatment pain in breast cancer. A detailed understanding of components of web-based interventions and their individual impact on acute pain and chronic pain is needed within future optimisation trials. Their effectiveness as preventative tools are yet to be decided.

Support for Chronic Pain Management for Breast Cancer Survivors Through Novel Digital Health Ecosystems: Pilot Usability Study of the PainRELife Mobile App

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is one of the most common and critical long-term effects of breast cancer. Digital health technologies enhance the management of chronic pain by monitoring physical and psychological health status and supporting pain self-management and patient treatment decisions throughout the clinical pathway.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study aims to evaluate patients' experiences, including usability, with a novel digital integrated health ecosystem for chronic pain named PainRELife. The sample included patients with breast cancer during survivorship. The PainRELife ecosystem comprises a cloud technology platform interconnected with electronic health records and patients' devices to gather integrated health care data.

METHODS

We enrolled 25 patients with breast cancer (mean age 47.12 years) experiencing pain. They were instructed to use the PainRELife mobile app for 3 months consecutively. The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate usability. Furthermore, pain self-efficacy and participation in treatment decisions were evaluated. The study received ethical approval (R1597/21-IEO 1701) from the Ethical Committee of the European Institute of Oncology.

RESULTS

The MARS subscale scores were medium to high (range: 3.31-4.18), and the total app quality score was 3.90. Patients with breast cancer reported reduced pain intensity at 3 months, from a mean of 5 at T0 to a mean of 3.72 at T2 (P=.04). The total number of times the app was accessed was positively correlated with pain intensity at 3 months (P=.03). The engagement (P=.03), information (P=.04), and subjective quality (P=.007) subscales were positively correlated with shared decision-making. Furthermore, participants with a lower pain self-efficacy at T2 (mean 40.83) used the mobile app more than participants with a higher pain self-efficacy (mean 48.46; P=.057).

CONCLUSIONS

The data collected in this study highlight that digital health technologies, when developed using a patient-driven approach, might be valuable tools for increasing participation in clinical care by patients with breast cancer, permitting them to achieve a series of key clinical outcomes and improving quality of life. Digital integrated health ecosystems might be important tools for improving ongoing monitoring of physical status, psychological burden, and socioeconomic issues during the cancer survivorship trajectory.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/41216.

Effect of perceived injustice-targeted pain neuroscience education compared with biomedically focused education in breast cancer survivors: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (BCS-PI trial)

INTRODUCTION

Current treatments for pain in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) are mostly biomedically focused rather than biopsychosocially driven. However, 22% of BCSs with pain are experiencing perceived injustice, which is a known predictor for adverse pain outcomes and opioid prescription due to increased maladaptive pain behaviour. Educational interventions such as pain neuroscience education (PNE) are suggested to target perceived injustice. In addition, motivational interviewing can be an effective behavioural change technique. This trial aims to examine whether perceived injustice-targeted PNE with the integration of motivational interviewing is superior to biomedically focused pain education in reducing pain after 12 months in BCS with perceived injustice and pain. In addition, improvements in quality of life, perceived injustice and opioid use are evaluated, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will finally result in a recommendation concerning the use of perceived injustice-targeted PNE in BCSs with perceived injustice and pain.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This two-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial will recruit female BCS (n=156) with pain and perceived injustice. Participants will be randomly assigned to perceived injustice-targeted PNE or biomedically focused pain education in each centre. Both interventions include an online session, an information leaflet and three one-to-one sessions. The primary outcome (pain), secondary outcomes (quality of life, perceived injustice and outcomes for cost-effectiveness analysis) and explanatory outcomes (pain phenotyping, sleep, fatigue and cognitive-emotional factors) will be assessed at baseline and at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months postintervention using self-reported questionnaires online. Treatment effects over time will be evaluated using linear mixed model analyses. Additionally, a cost-utility analysis will be done from a healthcare payer and societal perspective.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ethical agreement was obtained from the Main Ethics Committee (B.U.N.1432020000068) at the University Hospital Brussels and all other participating hospitals. Study results will be disseminated through presentations, conferences, social media, press and journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04730154.

Fentanyl in cancer pain management: avoiding hasty judgments and discerning its potential benefits

Cancer pain is an important challenge in treatment and requires a rapid onset of action for its control. In particular, breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) should be adequately controlled with a stable dose of a short-acting oral opioid. Fentanyl is a synthetic, highly selective opioid with many advantageous chemical properties, including high lipophilicity and distinct pharmacokinetic properties. It is recommended for pain management in a variety of settings, including acute pain, chronic pain and BTcP. To date, its variously designed formulations allow non-invasive administration; amongst others, sublingual fentanyl has proven useful in the management of BTcP and in improving the quality of life of patients with cancer. This review provides an update on the management of BTcP with fentanyl, with consideration of safety, as it remains an important tool in the treatment of cancer pain.

Barriers and facilitators to physical activity in cancer survivors with pain: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Pain post-treatment is a debilitating symptom in the growing population of cancer survivors. While physical activity is an integral part of pain management, low levels of physical activity are often observed in this population. The aim of this systematic review is to gain insight into the barriers and facilitators to physical activity in cancer survivors afflicted with pain.

METHODS

In December 2021, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science. All studies exploring barriers and/or facilitators to physical activity in cancer survivors with pain were included. The methodological quality of the evidence was appraised with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 2018).

RESULTS

Six articles were included. Current literature was limited and mostly focused on female breast cancer survivors. The identified barriers and facilitators could be categorized into six different domains: the logistical, symptoms, cognitive, clinical, social, and knowledge domain. The barrier of pain was reported as a barrier on its own that is closely linked to other barriers in this specific population.

CONCLUSION

Barriers and facilitators to physical activity were categorized in six different domains. The barrier of pain distinguishes itself and brings along additional obstacles such as anxiety, fear, and avoidance behavior. Current evidence is limited and focuses mostly on female breast cancer survivors. Further research in larger cohorts representing various subsets of cancer survivors with pain is warranted, as well as studies that implement these insights in physical activity interventions.

Effectiveness of Therapeutic Education in Patients with Cancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Objective: To review the existing evidence on pain education in patients with pain derived from an oncological process. (2) Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the databases Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, and Scopus. The selected studies had to incorporate instruction about the neurophysiology of pain into their educational program. The target population was cancer patients who had suffered pain for at least one month. The methodological quality of the articles collected was assessed using the PEDro scale. (3) Results: Some 698 studies were initially identified, of which 12 were included in this review. Four different models of pain education programs were found in the studies' interventions. Pain intensity, pain experience, quality of life, pain tolerance, and catastrophism were the variables that appeared most frequently. (4) Conclusions: This review demonstrates that pain education in patients with cancer pain may produce effects such as decreased pain intensity and catastrophism. Knowledge about pain also seems to increase. However, no benefit was reported for patients' overall quality of life. Therefore, more research is needed to clarify the effects of these interventions on the oncology population.

Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques

Pain is frequently reported during cancer disease, and it still remains poorly controlled in 40% of patients. Recent developments in oncology have helped to better control pain. Targeted treatments may cure cancer disease and significantly increase survival. Therefore, a novel population of patients (cancer survivors) has emerged, also enduring chronic pain (27.6% moderate to severe pain). The present review discusses the different options currently available to manage pain in (former) cancer patients in light of progress made in the last decade. Major progress in the field includes the recent development of a chronic cancer pain taxonomy now included in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the update of the WHO analgesic ladder. Until recently, cancer pain management has mostly relied on pharmacotherapy, with opioids being considered as the mainstay. The opioids crisis has prompted the reassessment of opioids use in cancer patients and survivors. This review focuses on the current utilization of opioids, the neuropathic pain component often neglected, and the techniques and non-pharmacological strategies available which help to personalize patient treatment. Cancer pain management is now closer to the management of chronic non-cancer pain, i.e., "an integrative and supportive pain care" aiming to improve patient's quality of life.

Central Sensitization in Cancer Survivors and Its Clinical Implications: State of the Art

Although the prevalence of cancer pain is 47% after treatment, cancer pain is often underestimated, and many patients are undertreated. The complexity of cancer pain contributes to the lack of its management. Recently, as the mechanism of cancer pain, it has become clear that central sensitization (CS) influences chronic pain conditions and the transition from acute to chronic pain. In this state-of-the-art review, we summarized the association of CS or central sensitivity syndrome with pain and the treatment for pain targeting CS in cancer survivors. The management of patients with CS should not only focus on tissue damage in either the affected body regions or within the central nervous system; rather, it should aim to target the underlying factors that sustain the CS process. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is gaining popularity for managing chronic musculoskeletal pain and could be effective for pain and CS in breast cancer survivors. However, there is a study that did not demonstrate significant improvements after PNE, so further research is needed. Precision medicine involves the classification of patients into subgroups based on a multifaceted evaluation of disease and the implementation of treatment tailored to the characteristics of each patient, which may play a central role in the treatment of CS.