Quality of life and perceived burden of the primary caregiver of patients aged 70 and over with cancer 5 years after initial treatment

Gender Differences in Disease Burden, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life Among People Living With Heart Failure and Multimorbidity: Cross-Sectional Study

AIM

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalisation and often coexists with seven comorbid conditions on average. This study aimed to examine the gender differences in disease burden, symptom burden, and quality of life among older adults with heart failure and multimorbidity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

This study utilised a baseline survey from an ongoing cohort study in 2022-2023. Adults aged ≥ 50 years with heart failure and more than one chronic condition were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital using an electronic patient portal. Disease burden was measured using a modified Disease Burden Impact Scale. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and EuroQoL-5D-5L assessed symptom burden and quality of life. Gender differences in baseline outcomes were examined using Pearson's Chi-square tests, Welch's t-tests, and multiple linear regressions.

RESULTS

Among 353 participants who completed the baseline survey, the mean (±SD) age was 70 (±9.5) years, and 50.1% were women (mean age: 67 ± 9 vs. men: 72 ± 10). In adjusted models, women had 4.9 points higher disease burden (p = 0.003) and reported higher symptom scores of pain (p = 0.018), tiredness (p = 0.021), nausea (p = 0.007), and loss of appetite compared to men (p = 0.036). Women had significantly more moderate/severe problems in usual activities and pain/discomfort and 0.07 points lower EuroQoL index than men (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

There were gender differences in disease/symptom burdens and quality of life. Women living with heart failure and multimorbidity had higher burdens but lower quality of life.

IMPACT

Identifying gender differences among people with heart failure and multimorbidity can be the first step to explaining health disparities. Research should take more inclusive and equitable approaches to address these differences. Healthcare providers, including nurses, should implement targeted strategies for effective multimorbidity management by considering these differences and disparities in clinical settings.

REPORTING METHOD

STROBE checklist, cross-sectional.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Support roles, carer burden, and decision-making preferences of carers of older adults with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer value the perspectives of significant others and their carers regarding decision-making about treatment. Understanding the support provided by carers, and their perspectives on involvement in treatment decision-making, can help us improve our communication with patients and their supports. We aimed to describe the roles, burden, and decision-making preferences of carers of older adults with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional survey of carers of older adults (≥65y) with cancer at three centres in Sydney, Australia. Type, frequency, and perspectives on providing care were evaluated using Likert scales. Preferred and perceived role in treatment decision-making by modified Control Preferences Scale, and carer burden by Zarit Burden Index (ZBI-12), were evaluated. Preferred role in decision-making and carer burden were compared between groups (culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds [CALD], sex, and carer age ≥ 65) by chi-squared or t-tests.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fourteen returned surveys were included (23 partially completed). Carer characteristics: median age 55y (range 24-90), female (74 %), child (49 %) and spouse (35 %) of the care-recipient. Care-recipient characteristics: median age 75y (range 65-96), receiving anti-cancer treatment (85 %), and CALD background (44 %). Carers were frequently involved in communication and information gathering (45 % -80 %) and supported instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (43 % - 81 %) more frequently than basic activities of daily living (ADLs) (2-13 %). Most (91 %) preferred to be present when treatment options were discussed. Their preferred role in treatment decision-making was passive in 66 %, collaborative in 30 %, and active in 4 %, with most (72 %) playing their preferred role. The preferred role was associated with carer age (p = 0.01) and CALD background (p = 0.04), with younger (<65y) carers and those caring for CALD older adults preferring a more passive role. Carer burden was 'low' in 29 %, 'moderate' in 31 %, and 'high' in 39 %, and providing psychological support was rated most challenging.

DISCUSSION

Carers of older adults with cancer play varied support roles, particularly in communication and information gathering. Carers prefer to be present for discussions about treatment options, though favour a passive role in treatment decision-making, upholding patient autonomy. Understanding the communication preferences of carers is an important consideration when supporting the patient in deciding treatment options and direction of care.

Decrease in Primary Caregivers' Quality of Life During the Care of a Relative with Palliative Care Needs: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The quality of life is a complex concept that is insufficiently assessed in clinical practice. It is influenced by different factors, as follows: the individual's characteristics, personal values and beliefs, physical and mental state, and relationship to other members of their community. The quality of life of the primary caregiver influences their health and the quality of their care interventions. This study aims to investigate how the quality of life of caregivers changes during palliative patients' care.

METHODS

This is a prospective longitudinal study that assesses the different aspects of the quality of life of primary caregivers who care for patients with palliative needs. The tool used in this study was the Medical Outcomes Scale-Short Form 36 (MOS-SF36).

RESULTS

This study included 140 caregivers, of which 63 were involved in the care of patients with cancer and 77 were involved in the care of patients with non-oncological diseases. Almost 9 out of 10 caregivers were a family member of the patient and over two-thirds of these were women. The caregivers of patients with non-malignant diseases had a decreased quality of life in the following aspects: limitations in their usual role due to emotional problems, social functioning, energy, and their perception of their general health. In the group of oncological patients, the caregivers displayed limitations in their daily role due to physical health, emotional problems, and social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The large number of responsibilities, the long time spent caring, and the uncertainty about the evolution of the disease as well as the marginalization and lack of time for oneself are some of the elements that increase caregiver burden. Along with this, the quality of life of caregivers decreases significantly in different aspects, such as physical, psycho-emotional, and social, with the perception of deteriorating general health.

Health literacy, eHealth literacy and their association with burden, distress, and self-efficacy among cancer caregivers

Purpose

Health literacy skills are vital for cancer caregivers in helping cancer survivors to navigate their diagnosis, treatment, and recovery but little is known. This study explored health literacy and eHealth literacy among cancer caregivers and the relationship between health literacy/eHealth literacy and potential associated factors.

Methods

Informal caregivers who had cared for an individual with cancer completed a survey which collected demographic data and measured caregiver health literacy, eHealth literacy, self-efficacy, burden, and distress.

Results

Seven percent of caregivers had inadequate health literacy. Caregivers scored lowest on health literacy domains related to caregiver social support, information seeking and understanding care recipient preferences. eHealth literacy was associated with self-efficacy and burden while, different health literacy domains were associated with burden ('Understanding care recipient needs and preferences'), self-efficacy ('Cancer-related communication with the care recipient' and 'Understanding care recipients needs and preferences') and distress ('Proactivity and determination to seek information', 'Understanding care recipient needs and preferences', 'Understanding the healthcare system').

Conclusion

Findings highlight key areas of need regarding cancer caregiver health literacy which future research can target. Given the observed relationship between aspects of health literacy and burden, distress and self-efficacy future work could be carried out on how to alleviate high levels of burden and distress and how to enhance self-efficacy among cancer caregivers by addressing health literacy skills.

Implications for cancer survivors

Findings from this study will inform the development of health literacy interventions to support caregivers to build their health literacy skills and enable this group to better support cancer survivors as a result.

Global Research on Care-Related Burden and Quality of Life of Informal Caregivers for Older Adults: A Bibliometric Analysis

As global populations continue to undergo demographic aging, the role of caregivers in providing essential support and assistance to older adults has become increasingly prominent. This demographic shift has led to a growing reliance on informal caregivers, often family members, who take on the responsibilities of caring for older adults. This not only affects immediate family dynamics but also holds broader implications for societal sustainability. The primary objective of this bibliometric analysis is to comprehensively examine the worldwide research output related to the quality of life and caregiver burden among individuals providing care to older adults. By understanding the worldwide research output related to caregivers and their quality of life and burden, we can assess the long-term sustainability of caregiving practices. We retrieved studies with titles containing the terms “caregivers”, “burden”, “quality of life”, and “aged” from the Web of Science (WOS) database. The collected publications were then subjected to analysis using the “bibliometric” package in the R programming environment. A total of 44 publications from 2006–2023 were included in the analysis. Spain emerged as the leading contributor in terms of the number of publications, accounting for 21.9%, followed by the USA at 16.5% and China at 13.6%. The most prolific institution was Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan, responsible for 25% of the publications. Among the authors, Cura-Gonzalez I.D. had the highest number of articles, contributing four publications, or 9.1% of the total output. An analysis of co-occurring keywords revealed that the predominant focus of the research revolved around caregiver burden, quality of life, health, care, stress, and impact, reflecting enduring areas of interest within this field. This bibliometric analysis may serve as a tool to provide insights into the current state of research on caregiver burden and quality of life among those caring for older adults. The results of this study can contribute to the assessment of research strategies and the encouragement of global cooperation in the field of care for older adults. By considering the multidimensional nature of caregiving challenges and promoting international cooperation, strides can be made towards sustainable caregiving practices that ensure the wellbeing of both caregivers and the aging population, thus safeguarding the sustainability of healthcare systems worldwide.

A qualitative exploration of the dynamics of guilt experience in family cancer caregivers

Caregiving for cancer patients can cause stress among family caregivers. Caregiving stress is also associated with guilt as they cannot provide adequate care for cancer patients. However, guilt among family caregivers of cancer patients is poorly understood. This qualitative study aimed to explore the dynamics of guilt feelings in families that care for cancer patients. This study involved 45 family caregivers of cancer patients. Thematic data analysis was conducted. There were six themes emerging. Caregiving can be challenging, guilt and blame, guilt due to lack of self-capacity, guilt for neglecting others, no guilt at all, and discussion of guilt and blame as a caregiver. This study offers insight into social workers regarding the challenges and experiences faced by family caregivers of cancer patients. Appropriate health interventions and support should be provided to family caregivers of cancer patients to improve their well-being.