Changing trends in surgical outcomes after major hepatobiliary resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience over 25 years

The association of perioperative blood transfusion with survival outcomes after major cancer surgery: a population-based cohort study in South Korea

PURPOSE

The correlation between perioperative blood transfusions and the prognosis after major cancer surgery remains controversial. We investigated the association between perioperative blood transfusion and survival outcomes following major cancer surgeries and analyzed trends in perioperative blood transfusions.

METHODS

Data for this population-based cohort study were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. Adult patients who underwent major cancer surgery between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, were included. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 253,016 patients, of which 55,094 (21.8%) received perioperative blood transfusions. In the multivariable logistic regression model, select factors, including neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, an increased preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index, moderate or severe liver disease, liver cancer surgery, and small bowel cancer surgery, were associated with an increased likelihood of blood transfusion. In the multivariable Cox regression model, patients who received blood transfusion had a significantly higher risk of 90-day mortality (hazard ratio: 5.68; 95% confidence interval: 5.37, 6.00; P < 0.001) than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

We identified potential risk factors for perioperative blood transfusions. Blood transfusion is associated with an increased 90-day mortality risk after major cancer surgery.

Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic bile leakage in hepatic resection with bilioenteric reconstruction - A international multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) after bilioenteric reconstruction (BR) is a feared complication after bile duct resection, especially in combination with liver resection. Literature on surgical outcome is sparse. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for AL after combined liver and bile duct resection with a focus on operative or endoscopic reinterventions.

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients who underwent liver resection and BR between 2004 and 2018 in 11 academic institutions in Europe were collected from prospectively maintained databases.

RESULTS

Within 921 patients, AL rate was 5.4% with a 30d mortality of 9.6%. Pringle maneuver (p<0.001),postoperative external biliary (p=0.007) and abdominal drainage (p<0.001) were risk factors for clinically relevant AL. Preoperative biliary drainage (p<0.001) was not associated with a higher rate of AL. AL was more frequent in stented patients (76.5%) compared to PTCD (17.6%) or PTCD+stent (5.9%,p=0.017). AL correlated with increased incidence of postoperative liver failure (p=0.036), cholangitis, hemorrhage and sepsis (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter data provides the largest series to date of LR with BR and could help in the management of these patients which are often challenging and hampering the patients' postoperative course negatively.

Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma - Novel Benchmark Values for Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From 24 Expert Centers

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to define robust benchmark values for the surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (PHC) to enable unbiased comparisons.

BACKGROUND

Despite ongoing efforts, postoperative mortality and morbidity remains high after complex liver surgery for PHC. Benchmark data of best achievable results in surgical PHC treatment are however still lacking.

METHODS

This study analyzed consecutive patients undergoing major liver surgery for PHC in 24 high-volume centers in 3 continents over the recent 5-year period (2014-2018) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year in each patient. Benchmark patients were those operated at high-volume centers (≥50 cases during the study period) without the need for vascular reconstruction due to tumor invasion, or the presence of significant co-morbidities such as severe obesity (body mass index ≥35), diabetes, or cardiovascular diseases. Benchmark cutoff values were derived from the 75th or 25th percentile of the median values of all benchmark centers.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eight (39%) of a total of 1829 consecutive patients qualified as benchmark cases. Benchmark cut-offs included: R0 resection ≥57%, postoperative liver failure (International Study Group of Liver Surgery): ≤35%; in-hospital and 3-month mortality rates ≤8% and ≤13%, respectively; 3-month grade 3 complications and the CCI: ≤70% and ≤30.5, respectively; bile leak-rate: ≤47% and 5-year overall survival of ≥39.7%. Centers operating mostly on complex cases disclosed better outcome including lower post-operative liver failure rates (4% vs 13%; P = 0.002). Centers from Asia disclosed better outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for PHC remains associated with high morbidity and mortality with now the availability of benchmark values covering 21 outcome parameters, which may serve as key references for comparison in any future analyses of individuals, group of patients or centers.

Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopic surgery (Lap) and robotic surgery (Rob) for radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is not clear. We summarized the safety and feasibility of Lap and Rob for HC.

METHODS

A search of all HC studies in English published on PubMed up to April 2020 was conducted. References from retrieved articles were reviewed to broaden the search.

RESULTS

In total, 23 reports were enrolled: 15 involving Lap, seven using Rob and one study reporting a minimally invasive approach (Lap or Rob, not specified). A total of 205 cases of HC were documented (Lap/Rob/not specified, 99/101/5): 37 cases of Bismuth type-I (Lap/Rob, 17/20), 22 cases of Bismuth type-II (Lap/Rob, 15/7), 68 cases of type-III (Lap/Rob, 39/29) and 13 cases of type-IV (Lap/Rob, 9/4). The pooled prevalence of R0 resection was 80.1% (Lap/Rob, 85.9%/71.0%). The weighted mean for operative time, blood loss and post-operative hospital stay was 458.4 min (Lap/Rob, 423.3/660.8 min), 615.3 mL (Lap/Rob, 521.0/1188.5 mL) and 14.0 days (Lap/Rob, 14.0/13.7 days), respectively. The pooled prevalence of conversion to open surgery, post-operative complications, and perioperative mortality was 9.1% (Lap/Rob, 12.2%/3.8%), 47.2% (Lap/Rob, 38.4%/61.3%) and 3.0% (Lap/Rob, 4.0%/2.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

With innovations in technology and gradual accumulation of surgical experience, the feasibility and safety of performing Lap and Rob for HC will improve.

Effect of structured use of preoperative portal vein embolization on outcomes after liver resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to reduce the risk of liver failure and subsequent mortality after major liver resection. Although a cut‐off value of 2·7 per cent per min per m² has been used with hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) for future remnant liver function (FRLF), patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) potentially benefit from an additional cut‐off of 8·5 per cent/min (not corrected for body surface area). Since January 2016 a more liberal approach to PVE has been adopted, including this additional cut‐off for HBS of 8·5 per cent/min. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of this approach on liver failure and mortality.

Methods

This was a single‐centre retrospective study in which consecutive patients undergoing liver resection under suspicion of PHC in 2000–2015 were compared with patients treated in 2016–2019, after implementation of the more liberal approach. Primary outcomes were postoperative liver failure (International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C) and 90‐day mortality.

Results

Some 191 patients with PHC underwent liver resection. PVE was performed in 6·4 per cent (9 of 141) of the patients treated in 2000–2015 and in 32 per cent (16 of 50) of those treated in 2016–2019. The 90‐day mortality rate decreased from 16·3 per cent (23 of 141) to 2 per cent (1 of 50) (P = 0·009), together with a decrease in the rate of liver failure from 19·9 per cent (28 of 141) to 4 per cent (2 of 50) (P = 0·008). In 2016–2019, 24 patients had a FRLF greater than 8·5 per cent/min and no liver failure or death occurred, suggesting that 8·5 per cent/min is a reliable cut‐off for patients with suspected PHC.

Conclusion

The major decrease in liver failure and mortality rates in recent years and the simultaneous increased use of PVE suggests an important role for PVE in reducing adverse outcomes after surgery for PHC.

Complications after liver surgery: a benchmark analysis

BACKGROUND

The best achievable short-term outcomes after liver surgery have not been identified. Several factors may influence the post-operative course of patients undergoing hepatectomy increasing the risk of post-operative complications. We sought to identify risk-adjusted benchmark values [BMV] for liver surgery.

METHODS

The National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to develop Bayesian models to estimate risk-adjusted BMVs for overall and liver related (post-hepatectomy liver failure [PHLF], biliary leakage [BL]) complications. A separate international multi-institutional database was used to validate the risk-adjusted BMVs.

RESULTS

Among the 11,243 patients included in the NSQIP database, the incidence of complications, PHLF, and BL was 36%, 5%, and 8%, respectively. The risk-adjusted BMVs for complication (range, 16-72%), PHLF (range, 1%-20%), and BL (range, 4%-22%) demonstrated a high variability based on patients characteristics. When tested using an international database including nine institutes, the risk-adjusted BMVs for complications ranged from 26% (Institute-4) to 43% (Institute-1), BMVs for PHLF between 3% (Institute-3) and 12% (Institute-5), while BMVs for BL ranged between 5% (Institute-4) and 9% (Institute-7).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple factors influence the risk of complications following hepatectomy. Risk-adjusted BMVs are likely much more applicable and appropriate in assessing "acceptable" benchmark outcomes following liver surgery.

Morbidity and mortality after major liver resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are known to be high. However, reported postoperative outcomes vary, with notable differences between Western and Asian series. We aimed to determine morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and assess differences in outcome regarding geographic location and hospital volume.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through November 20, 2017. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis and metaregression were performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies were included, representing 4,634 patients. Pooled 30-day and 90-day mortality were 5% (95% CI 3%-6%) and 9% (95% CI 6%-12%), respectively. Pooled overall morbidity and severe morbidity were 57% (95% CI 50%-64%) and 40% (95% CI 34%-47%), respectively. Western studies compared with Asian studies had a significantly higher 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and overall morbidity: 8% versus 2% (P < .001), 12% versus 3% (P < .001), and 63% versus 54% (P = .048), respectively. This effect on mortality remained significant after correcting for hospital volume. Univariate metaregression analysis showed no influence of hospital volume on mortality or morbidity, but when corrected for geographic location, higher hospital volume was associated with higher severe morbidity (P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are high. The Western series showed a higher mortality compared with the Asian series, even when corrected for hospital volume. Standardized reporting of outcomes is necessary. Underlying causes for differences in outcomes between Asian and Western centers, such as differences in treatment strategies, should be further analyzed.

The Surgical Management of Klatskin Tumours: Has Anything Changed in the Last Decade?

Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinomas requires complex pre-, intra- and post-operative decision-making. Despite the significant progress in liver surgery over the years, several issues such as the role of pre-operative biliary drainage, portal vein embolisation, staging laparoscopy and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy remain unresolved. Operative strategies such as vascular resection, caudate lobe resection and liver transplant have also been practiced in order to improve R0 resectability and improved survival. The review aims to consolidate evidence from major studies in the last 11 years. Survival data were only included from studies that reported the results in at least 30 patients with 1-year follow-up. A significant number of patients may be prevented an unnecessary laparotomy if they underwent a staging laparoscopy. There remain no guidelines as to when portal vein embolisation or pre-operative biliary drainage should be employed but most studies agree with pre-operative biliary drainage being an absolute indication if portal vein embolisation is performed. Concomitant hepatectomy and caudate lobectomy increases R0 resection but vascular resection cannot be routinely recommended. Liver transplant at specialised centres in selective patients has had impressive results. Guidelines are required for pre-operative biliary drainage and portal vein embolisation and randomised trials are required in order to define the role of vascular resection in achieving a R0 resection and increasing survival.

Improved surgical outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: changes in surgical procedures and related outcomes based on 40 years of experience at a single institution

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the changes in procedures for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) surgery and patient survival following HC surgery over a 40-year period.

METHODS

Between 1974 and 2014, 239 consecutive patients underwent surgery for HC. The changes in perioperative therapy and short- and long-term surgical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The rates of major hepatectomy (in particular, right hepatectomy) and R0 resection significantly increased. Blood loss, transfusion rate, morbidity, and surgical mortality all significantly decreased. The 5-year disease-specific survival was 9.29 % (n = 38) in 1974-1988, 41.1 % (n = 88) in 1989-2003 and 55.6 % (n = 57) in 2004-2008 (p = 0.0001: 1974-1988 vs 1989-2003, p < 0.0001:1974-1988 vs 2004-2008, p = 0.076: 1989-2003 vs 2004-2008). According to a multivariate analysis, Bismuth classification IV (HR vs I, 2.86), period 1989-2003 (HR vs 1974-1988, 0.31), 2004-2008 (HR vs 1974-1988, 0.26), and R1 or R2 resection (HR vs R0, 2.22) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The surgical outcomes for HC over the 40-year period clearly improved as a result of aggressive surgery and progress in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and diagnostic tools.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2015: the 2nd English edition

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery launched the clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas in 2008. Novel treatment modalities and handling of clinical issues have been proposed after the publication. New approaches for editing clinical guidelines, such as the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, also have been introduced for better and clearer grading of recommendations.

METHODS

Clinical questions (CQs) were proposed in seven topics. Recommendation, grade of recommendation and statement for each CQ were discussed and finalized by evidence-based approach. Recommendation was graded to grade 1 (strong) and 2 (weak) according to the concept of GRADE system.

RESULTS

The 29 CQs covered seven topics: (1) prophylactic treatment, (2) diagnosis, (3) biliary drainage, (4) surgical treatment, (5) chemotherapy, (6) radiation therapy, and (7) pathology. In 27 CQs, 19 recommendations were rated strong and 11 recommendations weak. Each CQ included the statement of how the recommendation was graded.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides recommendation for important clinical aspects based on evidence. Future collaboration with cancer registry will be a key for assessment of the guidelines and establishment of new evidence. Free full-text articles and a mobile application of this guideline are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/biliary-tract2.html.

Curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors for clinical decision making

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) has largely evolved, and increased resectability rates are reported. Large series of patients with resections for HC were published in the last years, and potential predictors for survival were explored. However, the usefulness of these predictors in clinical decision making is controversial.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present review is to explore the main prognostic factors after curative-intent surgery for HC, as emerged from the current literature. Furthermore, the impact of these predictors on clinical decision making is assessed.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical approach has improved the survival rates in patients with HC and implies bile duct resection associated with liver resection and loco-regional lymph node dissection. The AJCC staging system remains the main tool to assess the prognosis after resection of HC. Margin-negative resections and absence of lymph node metastases are the main prognostic factor after curative-intent surgery for HC. Response to chemotherapy is also a prognostic factor. Markers of systemic inflammatory response might predict prognosis of patients with HC, but their usefulness in clinical decision making remains unclear.

Combined portal vein resection in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the efficacy and safety of portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

METHODS

A thorough search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, the Chinese BioMedical Literature (CBM), and the Chinese Medical Current Contents (CMCC) databases was performed to identify comparative studies concerning combined portal vein resection (PVR) versus surgery without portal vein resection (Without PVR) and no surgical tumour resection (NR) in the treatment of HCCA.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with a total of 1921 HCCA cases were included. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that PVR was associated with a poorer overall survival than Without PVR (HR = 1.90; 95%CI 1.59-2.28; P < 0.00001) but was significantly better than NR (HR = 0.33; 95%CI 0.26-0.41; P < 0.00001). The PVR group exhibited significantly higher rates of advanced disease and a higher proportion of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.50; 95%CI 1.06-2.13; P = 0.02) and perineural invasion (OR = 2.95; 95%CI 1.80-4.84; P < 0.0001), and the PVR group exhibited a lower curative resection rate (OR = 0.65; 95%CI 0.46-0.91; P = 0.01). No significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to postoperative mortality and morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined PVR is safe and feasible in the treatment of HCCA when the portal vein is grossly involved. For advanced HCCA when the portal vein is grossly involved, surgical resection including PVR can benefit the overall survival in certain patients. However, further randomised controlled trials are necessary to determine the prognostic effects of the addition of PVR to the surgical procedure.

Combined portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) frequently invades into the adjacent portal vein, and portal vein resection (PVR) is the only way to manage this condition and achieve negative resection margins. However, the safety and effectiveness of PVR is controversial. Studies analyzing the effect of PVR on the surgical and pathological outcomes in the management of HCCA with gross portal vein involvement were considered eligible for this meta-analysis. The outcome variables analyzed included postoperative morbidity, mortality, survival rate, proportion of R0 resection, lymph node metastasis, microscopic vascular invasion, and perineural invasion. From 11 studies, 371 patients who received PVR and 1,029 who did not were identified and analyzed. Data from patients who received combined PVR correlated with higher postoperative death rates (OR = 2.31; 95 % CI, 1.21-4.43; P = 0.01) and more advanced tumor stage. No significant difference was detected in terms of morbidity, proportion of R0 resection, or 5-year survival rate. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that in centers with more experience or studies published after 2007, combined PVR did not cause significantly higher postoperative death. No strong evidence could suggest that combined PVR leads to more morbidity or mortality for patients with HCCA when the portal vein is grossly involved. In addition, combined PVR is oncologically valuable because R0 resection and 5-year survival did not differ significantly between two cohorts, despite the fact that the PVR cohort consisted of patients with more advanced HCCA.

Role of caudate lobectomy in type III A and III B hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a 15-year experience in a tertiary institution

BACKGROUND

Concomitant liver resection for type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma could improve the R0 resection rate and long-term outcome. In the present study, we examine the specific role of caudate lobectomy in liver resection for type III(A) and III(B) hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the prognostic factors for survival in this group of patients.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with type III(A) and III(B) hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection in Samsung Medical Center from January 1995 to July 2010. Patients were divided into those with and without caudate lobectomy (CL). The log rank test and Cox regression analysis were employed to investigate for prognostic factors of survival.

RESULTS

There were 127 patients in this cohort, 57 without CL (44.9%) and 70 with CL (55.1%). The demographics and symptoms of presentation were comparable. The median preoperative bilirubin level was significantly higher in the group undergoing CL (p = 0.017). Patients with CL had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (CL: 64.0 months vs without CL: 34.6 months) (p = 0.010) and disease-free survival (DFS) (CL: 40.5 months vs without CL: 27.0 months) (p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis showed that presence of symptoms (p = 0.025) and positive lymph node (LN) metastasis (p < 0.001) were negative prognostic factors for OS. Furthermore, multivariate analysis for DFS found that caudate lobectomy (p = 0.016) and positive LN metastasis (p = 0.001) were positive and negative prognostic factors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Caudate lobectomy contributed to improvement of DFS and OS in type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Other prognostic factors include positive LN metastasis and presence of symptoms.

Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer: Advances and current limitations

The aim of this review is to describe recent advances and topics in the surgical management of bile duct cancer. Radical resection with a microscopically negative margin (R0) is the only way to cure cholangiocarcinoma and is associated with marked survival advantages compared to margin-positive resections. Complete resection of the tumor is the surgeon's ultimate aim, and several advances in the surgical treatment for bile duct cancer have been made within the last two decades. Multidetector row computed tomography has emerged as an indispensable diagnostic modality for the precise preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer, in terms of both longitudinal and vertical tumor invasion. Many meticulous operative procedures have been established, especially extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, to achieve a negative resection margin, which is the only prognostic factor under the control of the surgeon. A complete caudate lobectomy and resection of the inferior part of Couinaud's segment IV coupled with right or left hemihepatectomy has become the standard surgical procedure for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is the first choice for distal bile duct cancer. Limited resection for middle bile duct cancer is indicated for only strictly selected cases. Preoperative treatments including biliary drainage and portal vein embolization are also indicated for only selected patients, especially jaundiced patients anticipating major hepatectomy. Liver transplantation seems ideal for complete resection of bile duct cancer, but the high recurrence rate and decreased patient survival after liver transplant preclude it from being considered standard treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy have a potentially crucial role in prolonging survival and controlling local recurrence, but no definite regimen has been established to date. Further evidence is needed to fully define the role of liver transplantation and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy.

Advances in understanding the mechanisms of impaired hepatic regeneration in patients with obstructive jaundice

The regenerative capacity of the liver is extraordinary. However, it has been observed preoperatively in some patients, such as those with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, that obstructive jaundice may affect hepatocyte proliferation and even cause hepatic failure after hepatectomy. The extent of impaired hepatic regeneration caused by biliary obstruction may determine whether surgical treatment should be conducted. Nowadays, the mechanisms of impaired hepatic regeneration in patients with obstructive jaundice have been studied extensively. The possible mechanisms include restricted portal venous flow, increased hepatocyte apoptosis, and altered expression of liver regeneration-associated factors. Thus, regulation of these factors might have beneficial effects on liver regeneration after hepatectomy in patients with obstructive jaundice.

Value of indocyanine green clearance of the future liver remnant in predicting outcome after resection for biliary cancer

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to predict hepatic functional reserve accurately before major hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to analyse the usefulness of the future liver remnant plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green (ICGK-F, calculated as plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green (ICGK) x proportion of the future liver remnant) in predicting death after major hepatectomy.

METHODS

Data on ICGK and ICGK-F were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively for 274 patients who underwent right hepatectomy, right trisectionectomy or left trisectionectomy for biliary cancer between 1991 and 2008. The mortality rate and incidence of postoperative complications were analysed. Patients were separated into two groups according to year of operation (85 patients operated on between 1991 and 2000; 189 from 2001 to 2008).

RESULTS

In multiple logistic regression analyses, an ICGK-F less than 0.05 had the strongest impact on the incidence of postoperative mortality (odds ratio 8.06; P < 0.001). The postoperative mortality rate was significantly lower in the later period (P < 0.001). In patients with an ICGK-F value between 0.040 and 0.049, the mortality rate in the early period was 30 per cent, whereas it was only 8 per cent in the later period.

CONCLUSION

An ICGK-F of 0.05 is a useful cut-off value for predicting mortality and morbidity. With careful perioperative patient management in an experienced institution, this cut-off value can be lowered further.

Role of preoperative optimization of the liver for resection in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma type III

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival after complete resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains disappointing. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of liver optimization on postoperative outcome of hilar cholangiocarcinoma type III.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective, single-center analysis, outcomes in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma type III who underwent resection after preoperative liver optimization (preoperative transhepatic biliary drainage [PTBD], bile replacement, and/or portal vein embolization [PVE]) were compared with nonoptimized controls.

RESULTS

Of 41 patients undergoing surgery, 38 patients undergoing curative intent procedures were identified, of whom 15 underwent preoperative optimization. After PTBD, direct bilirubin decreased from 218.0 ± 184.2 to 75.9 ± 42.7 μmol/L (P = 0.03), and there was a trend toward decreased AST and ALT levels. Overall, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 47.9 ± 9.1 and 41.9 ± 9.8%. The primary endpoint, 5-year survival after surgery, was not significantly different between groups. Preoperative jaundice was identified as an independent prognostic factor for poor outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12, P = 0.02). Four patients (10.5%) without preoperative optimization died of liver failure within the first 30 days postsurgery, preceded in three cases by intra-abdominal abscesses. PTBD was associated with a lower rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses; however this factor was not independently predictive of higher survival.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative optimization of the liver in hilar cholangiocarcinoma Type III reduced the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses, but its impact on postoperative survival remains unclear.

Surgical Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma—A Single Center Experience

This study aimed to evaluate outcome after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). In a 72-month period a total of 25 patients operated on for ICC were followed-up with postoperatively. Eleven right hemihepatectomies (8 extended), seven left hemihepatectomies (3 extended), one segmental resection, two bisegmentectomies (II + III), and four nonanatomical resections were performed. Median observation period was 2.7 (range: 0.2-6.9) years. Analysis focused on age, gender, tumor-size, operating time, histologic resection margin, Tumor-Node-Metastasis-stage, reoperations, postoperative complications, tumor recurrence, survival rate and a putative relation between p53 accumulation, ki67 index, MUC1 positivity, and prognosis. Mean tumor size was 6.49 ± 3.93 cm. Eighteen patients (72%) underwent lymph node dissection. Major postoperative complications occurred in 10 patients. Seventeen patients (68%) showed tumor recurrence. Mean time to tumor recurrence was 6.7 (5.7-15.4) months. We found no correlation between p53 accumulation/ki67 index counts/Mucin 1 cell surface associated antibody (MUC1) positivity and ICC prognosis. A total of 13 patients died (52%) including one early and 12 late deaths. Mean time from surgery to death was 14.6 (7.4-30.9) months. Survival rate at 1 year was 84 per cent, at 3 years 57 per cent, and at 5 years 45 per cent. In our review only a small number of these 25 patients are indeed cured.

Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector-row computed tomography for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic reliability of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for the evaluation of tumor spread in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Images obtained from a 16-detector row scanner of 22 patients were interpreted. The diagnostic accuracy of longitudinal ductal spread, vertical invasion (including hepatic parenchyma), and lymph node metastasis was assessed with reference to histopathological findings.

RESULTS

The location of the tumor was correctly diagnosed in 95% of cases (21/22), but in five of these cases, the cut end of the intrahepatic bile duct was positive, resulting in 77% diagnostic accuracy for longitudinal spread. Among the patients with a negative bile duct surgical margin, there was a significant difference in the measurement of tumor spread between MDCT and microscopic investigation (P < 0.001). For vertical invasion, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MDCT were 69%, 100%, 100%, and 69% for the liver parenchyma, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MDCT for lymph node metastasis were 50%, 75%, 43%, and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for tumor location and vertical invasion was satisfactory, but ductal spread was underestimated in comparison with microscopic measurements.

Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus are defined as "perihilar cholangiocarcinoma". The principle of surgical treatment is hemi-hepatectomy or trisectionectomy of the liver, caudate lobectomy, and resection of the extrahepatic bile duct for complete resection of the tumor. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model, we analyzed the results in 125 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who had undergone major hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Right hepatectomy, right trisectionectomy, left hepatectomy, and left trisectionectomy were performed in 66, 8, 49, and 2 patients, respectively. Curative resection was achieved in 79 patients (63.2%). Mortality and morbidity rates were 8.0 and 48.7%, respectively. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of all patients were 73.2, 36.7, and 34.7%, respectively. The median survival was 26.8 months. Multivariate analysis showed that the independent prognostic factors for overall survival were gender, histopathological grading, curative resection, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) pT.

CONCLUSIONS

Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma was acceptable and showed satisfactory outcomes. For long-term survival in these patients, the surgeon should aim for complete resection of the tumor with negative margins.

Abdominal wall recurrence of Hilar bile duct cancer 12 years after a curative resection: report of a case

A 74-year-old woman was diagnosed with hilar bile duct cancer, and underwent a curative resection of the bile duct and the left and caudate lobes of the liver in 1995. Ten years later (April 2005), she noted a small mass in the abdominal wall. The mass slowly enlarged to reach 4 cm in diameter by January 2007. With a diagnosis of a possible recurrence of bile duct cancer, a laparotomy was thus performed. The abdominal wall tumor was buried in the rectus abdominis muscle and was tightly attached to the ileum. The lesion was resected en bloc with the associated rectus muscle and ileocecal region. A histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed tubular adenocarcinoma that closely resembled the original primary bile duct cancer. In addition, the immunohistochemical staining pattern of the abdominal tumor was identical to that of the original bile duct cancer. This indicated that the abdominal tumor represented a local recurrence (probably due to peritoneal implantation) at 12 years after the resection of the hilar bile duct cancer. This case emphasizes that long-time surveillance is required for patients with bile duct cancer, even if they have survived without recurrence for more than 5 years after a curative resection.