Determining resectability for hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography

Optimizing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia-patient selection and special considerations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common affliction in Asia. The treatment of HCC depends on the tumor status as well as the underlying liver function. Resection is the cornerstone of surgical management of HCC. For those unfit to undergo resection, local ablative therapy is a viable alternative. For patients with multiple small unresectable HCCs, liver transplantation offers another option, having the simultaneous benefit of removing the cancer in addition to replacing the pre-malignant and cirrhotic liver together. However, the paucity of liver grafts limits the applicability of this operation. In assessing for the appropriate treatment, the traditional TNM staging is not widely applied to HCC. Conventionally, doctors in the West have relied on the Barcelona staging system. Asian surgeons, on the other hand, have long adopted a more aggressive approach for their patients. Borne out of the need for a system which better suited Asian patients, the Hong Kong guidelines have been established. For the surgical resection of HCC, considerations must take into account issues regarding the tumor, the underlying liver and the patient. For the tumor, the size, the presence vascular invasion and presence of extra-hepatic metastasis will determine operability. Another important issue is the liver function and, by extension, the estimated residual liver volume after resection. Thirdly, patient factors i.e., fitness to undergo general anesthesia must be properly assessed. With improved surgical technique and better patient selection, peri-operative morbidity and long-term survival results after operation have improved drastically over the past decades.

Staging laparoscopy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: is it useful?

BACKGROUND

Staging laparoscopy (SL) is not regularly performed for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It may change treatment strategy, preventing unnecessary open exploration. An additional advantage of SL is possible biopsy of the nontumorous liver to assess fibrosis/cirrhosis. This study aimed to determine whether SL for patients with HCC still is useful.

METHODS

Patients with HCC who underwent SL between January 1999 and December 2011 were analyzed. Their demographics, preoperative imaging studies, surgical findings, and histology were assessed.

RESULTS

The 56 patients (34 men and 22 women; mean age, 60 ± 14 years) in this study underwent SL for assessment of extensive disease or metastases. For two patients, SL was unsuccessful because of intraabdominal adhesions. For four patients (7.1 %), SL showed unresectability because of metastases (n = 1), tumor progression (n = 1), or severe cirrhosis in the contralateral lobe (n = 2). An additional five patients did not undergo laparotomy due to disease progression detected on imaging after SL. Exploratory laparotomy for the remaining 47 patients showed 6 (13 %) additional unresectable tumors due to advanced tumor (n = 5) or nodal metastases (n = 1). Consequently, the yield of SL was 7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 3-17 %), and the accuracy was 27 % (95 % CI, 11-52 %). A biopsy of the contralateral liver was performed for 45 patients who underwent SL, leading to changes in management for 4 patients (17 %) with cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall yield of SL for HCC was 7 %, and the accuracy was 27 %. When accurate imaging methods are available and additional percutaneous liver biopsy is implemented as a standard procedure in the preoperative workup of patients with HCC, the benefit of SL will become even less.

Pretreatment assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: expert consensus statement

Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is complex and relies on multiple factors including tumor extent and hepatic function. No single staging system is applicable to all patients with HCC. The staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer / International Union for Cancer Control should be used to predict outcome following resection or liver transplantation. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer scheme is appropriate in patients with advanced HCC not candidate for surgery. Dual phase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can be used for pretreatment assessment of tumor extent but the accuracy of these methods remains poor to characterize < 1 cm lesions. Assessment of tumor response should not rely only on tumor size and new imaging methods are available to evaluate response to therapy in HCC patients. Liver volumetry is part of the preoperative assessment of patients with HCC candidate for resection as it reflects liver function. Preoperative portal vein embolization is indicated in patients with small future liver remnant (≤ 20% in normal liver; ≤ 40% in fibrotic or cirrhotic liver). Tumor size is not a contraindication to liver resection. Liver resection can be proposed in selected patients with multifocal HCC. Besides tumor extent, surgical resection of HCC may be performed in selected patients with chronic liver disease.

Current status of laparoscopic surgery in gastrointestinal malignancies

Laparoscopy has become a significant tool in a surgeon's armamentarium since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1989. Oncological surgeons have been slow in adopting laparoscopy for fear of inadequate cancer operation and occurrence of port site metastasis. Neither of these concerns have stood the test of time. Laparoscopy is being used increasingly in oncological surgery both for staging and respective surgery. This article outlines the present use of laparoscopy in GI cancer surgery.

The evolving influence of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

With the recent introduction of laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and laparoscopic/open radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the role of preoperative laparoscopic staging may be expanded. The objective of this study was to determine the role of preoperative laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography (USG) in patients with HCC.

METHODS

From January 2001 to April 2007, a cohort of 122 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of potentially resectable HCC underwent staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic USG before performing a major laparotomy in a tertiary referral center. The patients' data were collected prospectively. We have retrospectively analyzed the effect of implementation of this staging technique in our center.

RESULTS

Preoperative laparoscopy and laparoscopic USG was successful in 119 patients (97.5%). Forty-four patients were found to be unresectable after laparoscopic staging, whereas 2 patients were found to be unresectable after exploratory laparotomy. The total number of patients who underwent curative liver resection was 73 (laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, 22 patients; open partial hepatectomy, 51 patients). The median hospital stay of the laparoscopic liver resection group was significantly shorter than that of the open resection group (8 vs 13 d; P = .002). Intraoperative treatment for patients with unresectable HCC, including local ablative therapy, or combined liver resection and local ablative therapy, was performed in 27 of 45 inoperable patients (60%) (laparoscopic approach, 8 patients; open approach, 19 patients). The median hospital stay of the laparoscopic treatment group was significantly shorter than for the open treatment group for patients with unresectable HCC (5 vs 7 d; P = .003). In this study, a laparoscopic treatment approach for HCC was performed in 25.2% of the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy and laparoscopic USG have a significant effect both on identifying surgically untreatable disease and in selecting the optimal treatment strategy. Some patients will benefit from a laparoscopic therapy approach. Therefore, it argues for more widespread use in laparoscopic staging procedures for patients with potentially resectable HCC.

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: A critical review from the surgeon's perspective

BACKGROUND

The treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is surgical resection but only a small percentage of patients are operative candidates. Percutaneous radiofrequency interstitial thermal ablation (RFA) has proved to be effective in the treatment of unresectable HCC. However, there is a sub-group of patients who may benefit from a laparoscopic rather than a percutaneous approach. Laparoscopic RFA offers the combined advantages of improved tumor staging based on the intracorporeal ultrasound examination and safer access to liver lesions that are difficult or impossible to treat with a percutaneous approach. The aim of our review was to evaluate the advantages and limitations of the laparoscopic approach, according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic RFA of HCC proved to be a safe and effective technique, at least in terms of the short- and mid-term results. This technique may be indicated in selected cases of HCC when percutaneous RFA is very difficult or contraindicated.

[The role of laparoscopy assessing the resectability of hepatic malignancies]

INTRODUCTION

Regarding the prognosis of hepatic malignancies, surgical resection can provide a 40% 5-year survival, however liver transplantation (OLTX) shows even better results. Unfortunately, many patients have non-resectable disease due to either the number and the position of the tumours or its distant spread. It is relatively frequent that it turns out only at the time of the surgical exploration that the patient is inoperable. Hence, in addition to preoperative clinical evaluation and imaging, laparoscopy can be valuable in further staging and assessment of resectability in selected cases.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

310 patients underwent hepatic resection between 1 January 2000 and 31 March 2006. A retrospective analysis was carried out of 39 patients, who underwent laparoscopy prior to the planned hepatectomy. 22 patients (56%) were diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while 17 patients (44%) had hepatic metastases.

RESULTS

Altogether 70% of the patients were found to have non-resectable tumour on laparoscopy. However, when these patients underwent laparotomy, non-resectable disease was found in 50% of them. Laparoscopy was helpful to demonstrate non-resectability of the tumour when carcinosis peritonei or multifocal lesions were present, but central or venous invasion could not be assessed adequately with this technique.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy can be an important component of the preoperative staging of malignant hepatic tumours. Further, it can help to avoid unnecessary laparotomies. However, this procedure is recommended in selected patients only, and its general use is not indicated.

Delayed Colonic Perforation After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Colonic perforation secondary to RFA of the liver is an uncommon complication that has been reported to have an incidence between 0.1% and 0.3%. Lesions adjacent (within 1 cm) to the colonic wall and those in patients with history of upper abdominal surgery or chronic cholecystitis are particularly at risk. More importantly, thermal injury leading to colonic perforation has proved to have a fatal outcome. We present a case of percutaneous RFA in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma that was abutting the colonic hepatic flexure. Colonic perforation was diagnosed on the eighth day postablation when the patient was readmitted with peritonitis.

INLINE RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION: FIRST EXPERIMENT WITH STAPLING DEVICE

BACKGROUND

In liver surgery, the increase in advancement of laparoscopic equipment has allowed the feasibility and safety of complex laparoscopic liver resection. However, blood loss and the potential risk of gas embolism seem to be the main obstacles. In this study, we successfully used the InLine radiofrequency ablation (RFA) device to carry out laparoscopic hand-assisted liver resection in pigs.

METHODS

Under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation, pigs underwent InLine RFA-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. After installation of Hand Port and trocars, the InLine RFA device was introduced through Hand Port system and inserted into the premarked resection line. Then the generator was turned on and the power was applied according to the power setting. The resection was finally carried out using diathermy or stapler. For the control group, resection was simply carried out by diathermy or stapler.

RESULTS

Eight Landrace pigs underwent 23 liver resections. Blood loss was reduced significantly in the InLine group (P<0.001) when compared with control group in both surgical methods (diathermy and stapler).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we successfully carried out InLine RFA-assisted laparoscopic liver resection in both stapled and diathermy group. We showed that there was a highly significant difference between InLine and other liver resection techniques laparoscopically.

Diagnostic laparoscopy in the evaluation of the viral hepatitis patient with potentially resectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite significant recent improvements in liver imaging, preoperative evaluation of the potentially resectable patient with viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is often inaccurate. Diagnostic laparoscopy may change management for patients with under-appreciated nodular cirrhosis or intrahepatic metastases, preventing unnecessary open exploration. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of routine laparoscopy as a separate procedure prior to resection in the evaluation of patients with potentially resectable HCC.

METHODS

Patients with potentially resectable HCC were evaluated preoperatively with routine blood tests and axial imaging. All study patients also underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography. Laparoscopy was performed in an inpatient hospital setting, with 23 hour stays in most cases.

RESULTS

Among 65 patients evaluated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma between July 2001 and November 2003, 20 patients with potentially resectable disease were evaluated by diagnostic laparoscopy. All patients had viral Hepatitis: 16 with Hepatitis B and 4 with Hepatitis C. All study patients had cirrhosis; 18 classified as Child's-Pugh A and 2 as Child's-Pugh B. Diagnostic laparoscopy changed the management in 9/20 (45%) cases. Management was changed because of severe nodular cirrhosis in 4 cases, inaccurate assessment of intrahepatic metastases in 2 cases, inability to identify an HCC in 1 case, peritoneal carcinomatosis in 1 case, and inability to tolerate induction to general anesthesia in 1 case.

DISCUSSION

Diagnostic laparoscopy is useful in the evaluation of the potentially resectable patient with HCC. Information obtained from laparoscopy may change the clinical management in up to 45% of cases.

Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database

OBJECTIVE

To assess the trends in perioperative outcome of hepatectomy for hepatobiliary diseases.

METHODS

Data of 1222 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatobiliary diseases from July 1989 to June 2003 in a tertiary institution were collected prospectively. Perioperative outcome of patients in the first (group I) and second (group II) halves of this period was compared. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Diagnoses included hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 734), other liver cancers (n = 257), extrahepatic biliary malignancies (n = 43), hepatolithiasis (n = 101), benign liver tumors (n = 61), and other diseases (n = 26). The majority of patients (61.8%) underwent major hepatectomy of > or = 3 segments. The overall hospital mortality and morbidity were 4.9% and 32.4%, respectively. The number of hepatectomies increased from 402 in group I to 820 in group II, partly as a result of more liberal patient selection. Group II had more elderly patients (P = 0.006), more patients with comorbid illnesses (P = 0.001), and significantly worse liver function. Nonetheless, group II had lower blood loss (median 750 versus 1450 mL, P < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (17.3% versus 67.7%, P < 0.001), morbidity (30.0% versus 37.3%, P = 0.012), and hospital mortality (3.7% versus 7.5%, P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine, major hepatic resection, and transfusion were the significant predictors of hospital mortality, whereas concomitant extrahepatic procedure, thrombocytopenia, and transfusion were the predictors of morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative outcome has improved despite extending the indication of hepatectomy to more high-risk patients. The role of hepatectomy in the management of hepatobiliary diseases can be expanded. Reduced perioperative transfusion is the main contributory factor for improved outcome.

Influence of laparoscopy on postoperative recurrence and survival in patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatic resection

Background

Use of laparoscopy in patients with gastrointestinal cancer has been associated with port-site and peritoneal tumour metastases. The effect of laparoscopy on tumour recurrence and long-term survival in patients undergoing resection of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unknown.

Methods

Between June 1994 and December 2001, 59 patients with ruptured HCC underwent surgical exploration with a view to hepatic resection. Laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 33 patients; the other 26 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy without laparoscopy. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

Exploratory laparotomy was avoided in 12 of 13 patients with irresectable HCC who had a laparoscopy. The hospital stay of these 12 patients was significantly shorter than that of eight patients found to have irresectable HCC at exploratory laparotomy (median 11 versus 15 days; P = 0·043). Twenty patients had a laparoscopy followed by open resection of HCC, whereas 18 patients underwent laparotomy and resection without laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in disease-free (16 versus 19 per cent; P = 0·525) and overall (32 versus 48 per cent; P = 0·176) survival at 3 years between the two groups. The tumour recurrence pattern was similar between the two groups, and there were no port-site or wound metastases.

Conclusion

Use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with ruptured HCC helps avoid unnecessary exploratory laparotomy. The present data suggest that laparoscopy does not have an adverse effect on tumour recurrence or survival in patients who undergo resection.

Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection and postoperative outcome

Hepatic resection and liver transplantation are considered the only curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation for HCCs < or =5 cm in diameter has been shown to produce favorable survival results, but its application is limited by the lack of donors. Hepatic resection remains the treatment of choice for patients who are not transplantation candidates because of large tumor, macroscopic vascular invasion, or advanced age. For small HCCs associated with Child's A cirrhosis, hepatic resection should still be considered the first-line treatment, but salvage transplantation for intrahepatic recurrence may be a feasible strategy. Recent improvement in surgical techniques and perioperative care has increased the safety and expanded the indication of hepatic resection for HCC to include large tumors that require extended hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients. Selection of appropriate candidates for hepatectomy depends on careful assessment of the tumor status and liver function reserve. Evaluation of the general fitness of patients is also critical because comorbid illness is an important cause of postoperative mortality, even if the patients have good liver function reserve. With careful patient selection and surgical expertise, the current operative mortality of hepatectomy for HCC is about 5% or less in major centers. Improved long-term survival results after resection of HCC have also been reported recently, with an overall 5-year survival rate of about 50%. The improved perioperative and long-term survival results have strengthened the role of hepatectomy as the mainstay of treatment for HCC despite the availability of a number of other treatment options for localized HCC.

Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic approach for liver resections is still limited and controversial. Nevertheless the advantages connected with a mini-invasive approach are significant, especially in cirrhotic patients. In recent years the progress of laparoscopic procedures and the development of new and dedicated technologies have made endoscopic hepatic surgery feasible and safe. The aim of this study was to report the results of our experience in laparoscopic liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2003, 16 patients (10 male, 6 female; age 48-69 years; mean age 60.1 years) with HCC and associated severe but well compensated liver cirrhosis underwent laparoscopic hepatic resections at our department. Mean tumour size was 2.9 cm (range 1-3.9). Seven of these lesions were in the left liver and nine in the right lobe. Laparoscopy was performed under CO(2) pneumoperitoneum. The liver was always examined using laparoscopic ultrasound (US) to confirm the extension of the lesions and their relationships to the vasculature. The Pringle manoeuvre was not used. The transection of liver parenchyma was obtained by the use of a harmonic scalpel. The specimens were placed in a plastic bag and removed without contact to the abdominal wall.

RESULTS

There was one conversion to laparotomy for inadequate exposure. In the remaining 15 patients we performed 13 non-anatomical resections, I segmentectomy and I anatomical left lobectomy. The mean operative time was 152 min (range 80-180). Mean blood loss was 280 ml and none of the patients required blood transfusions. In two patients the resection margin was <1 cm but the capsule was not infiltrated at histology. One patient died on the third postoperative day from a severe respiratory distress syndrome. Major morbidities occurred in two patients who developed moderate postoperative ascites, which resolved successfully with conservative treatment. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.8 days. Mean follow-up time has been 18 months, and to date no recurrences at the site of resection or port-site metastases have been observed.

DISCUSSION

Limited laparoscopic liver resections in cirrhotic patients are technically feasible with a low complication rate when careful selection criteria are followed (hepatic involvement limited and located in the left or anterior right segments, tumour size smaller than 5 cm, Child-Pugh class A). This approach could be considered the best option for the treatment of small esophitic or subcapsular HCC on well compensated cirrhosis and a useful option when it is necessary to perform a left lateral anatomical resection or non-anatomical resection in well selected patients. In fact the mini-invasive approach can minimise the postoperative morbidity rate, which is still too high in this group of patients. It must be performed in highly specialised units by surgeons assisted by all requested technologies and with extensive experience in hepatobiliary and advanced laparoscopic surgery.

New considerations for an overall approach to treat hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of cases and organ shortage justify reconsidering the global therapeutic approach for hepatocelluar carcinoma in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

Recent literature was reviewed, focused on new therapeutic technologies such as radiofrequency.

RESULTS

For small tumors, liver transplantation offers theoretically the best chance for cure. However, organ shortage may eliminate this advantage, because of tumor progression while waiting for a graft. For small tumors, arising on compensated cirrhosis, resection or radiofrequency ablation may provide efficient local tumor control without precluding subsequent transplantation in case of tumor recurrence and/or cirrhosis decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

For small tumors and compensated cirrhosis, resection or radiofrequency could represent acceptable first line treatments. In addition to permit safe and immediate tumor control, this strategy would allow a preferential redistribution of grafts to patients with decompensated cirrhosis in whom transplantation is the only possibility.