Effect of gastric cancer screening on long-term survival of gastric cancer patients: results of Korean national cancer screening program

Advances in the application of hydrogel adhesives for wound closure and repair in abdominal digestive organs

The abdominal cavity houses the majority of the digestive system organs, which frequently suffer from diseases with limited responsiveness to pharmacological treatments, such as bleeding, perforation, cancer, and mechanical obstruction. Invasive procedures, including endoscopy and surgery, are typically employed to manage these conditions. Currently, sutures and staplers remain the gold standard for internal wound closure. However, these methods inevitably cause secondary tissue damage. Unlike superficial organs such as the skin, the abdominal cavity presents a relatively confined environment where postoperative complications tend to be more severe. To achieve wound closure and repair, hydrogel adhesives have garnered attention due to their minimal invasiveness, robust sealing, and ease of application. Nonetheless, the application of hydrogel adhesives within the abdominal cavity faces several challenges, including adhesion in moist environments, selective adhesion, and resistance to acids and digestive enzymes. To date, there has been no comprehensive review focused on the use of hydrogel adhesives for wound closure in abdominal digestive organs. This review introduces the design principles of hydrogel adhesives tailored for abdominal organs and provides a detailed overview of recent advances in their applications for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection, gastric perforation, hepatic bleeding, pancreatic leakage, and intestinal anastomotic leakage. Additionally, the current challenges and future directions of hydrogel adhesives are discussed. This review aims to provide valuable insights for the development of next-generation hydrogel adhesives for wound closure and repair in abdominal digestive organs.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Oral Microbiome Signatures as Potential Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Risk Assessment

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The oral microbiota was investigated for distinguishable characteristics between GC, premalignant gastric conditions (Pre-GC), and control participants.

METHODS

Mouthwash samples from GC, Pre-GC, and control participants at a tertiary care center were prospectively collected. Following DNA extraction and sequencing, analyses of oral microbiome biodiversity and composition were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to evaluate the discriminative power of oral microbiome signatures.

RESULTS

Oral samples from 98 participants included 30 (30.6%) GC, 30 (30.6%) Pre-GC and 38 (38.8%) controls. Of these, 61 (62.2%) were female, 31 (31.6%) were Hispanic, and 18 (18.3%) were smokers. GC compared to controls demonstrated notable differences in beta diversity (Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity, p<0.02). 32 bacterial genera were found to be differentially abundant when comparing GC and controls, and 23 bacterial genera demonstrated differential abundance when comparing Pre-GC and controls (W-statistic >2). Minimal compositional differences between GC and Pre-GC were found, with only three differentially abundant bacterial genera (W-statistic >2). Models were constructed from the most significant bacterial signatures (W-statistic >5). These models discriminated between GC and control oral samples with an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.808, 0.952) and between Pre-GC and control oral samples with an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI 0.887, 0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral rinses of GC and Pre-GC participants exhibited distinct but similar microbiome profiles, distinguishing them from controls. This compositional difference raises the possibility of utilizing these microbial signatures to predict GC risk.

Sprayable Hydrogel Sealant for Gastrointestinal Wound Shielding

Naturally occurring internal bleeding, such as in stomach ulcers, and complications following interventions, such as polyp resection post-colonoscopy, may result in delayed (5-7 days) post-operative adverse events-such as bleeding, intestinal wall perforation, and leakage. Current solutions for controlling intra- and post-procedural complications are limited in effectiveness. Hemostatic powders only provide a temporary solution due to their short-term adhesion to GI mucosal tissues (less than 48 h). In this study, a sprayable adhesive hydrogel for facile application and sustained adhesion to GI lesions is developed using clinically available endoscopes. Upon spraying, the biomaterial (based on polyethyleneimine-modified Pluronic micelles precursor and oxidized dextran) instantly gels upon contact with the tissue, forming an adhesive shield. In vitro and in vivo studies in guinea pigs, rabbits, and pig models confirm the safety and efficacy of this biomaterial in colonic and acidic stomach lesions. The authors' findings highlight that this family of hydrogels ensures prolonged tissue protection (3-7 days), facilitates wound healing, and minimizes the risk of delayed complications. Overall, this technology offers a readily adoptable approach for gastrointestinal wound management.

Randomized controlled trial comparing the costs of gastric cancer screening systems between serological risk-based upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and the existing barium photofluorography: gastric cancer screening labeled by serum examination in place of aged gastric cancer organized screening systems (GALAPAGOS study)

BACKGROUND

Although the risk of gastric cancer can be stratified according to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) IgG antibody titer and pepsinogen levels (ABC classification), a population-based gastric cancer screening system combining serological tests and endoscopy has not been introduced. This study aimed to compare the total testing cost per participant between the ABC classification method and the existing protocol.

METHODS

Using the minimization method with sex and age as allocation factors, 1206 participants were randomly assigned to the following two methods for a 5-year intervention: barium photofluorography as primary examination followed by detailed examination with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (Ba-Endo) and risk-based upper gastrointestinal endoscopy by ABC classification (ABC-Endo). The primary endpoint was the total testing cost per participant over a 5-year period. The secondary endpoint was the expense required to detect one gastric cancer.

RESULTS

The total testing cost per participant was 39,711 yen in Ba-Endo (604 participants) and 45,227 yen in ABC-Endo (602 participants), with the latter being significantly higher (p < 0.001). During the intervention period, gastric cancer was found in 11 and eight participants in Ba-Endo and ABC-Endo, respectively. The expenses required to detect one gastric cancer were 2,240,931 yen in Ba-Endo and 3,486,662 yen in ABC-Endo.

CONCLUSIONS

The testing cost per participant turned out to be higher in the ABC-Endo group than in the Ba-Endo group. This superiority trial, based on the hypothesis that the cost of testing is lower for ABC-Endo than for Ba-Endo, was rejected.

Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009-2022

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the socioeconomic inequality in gastric cancer (GC) screening in Korea. Socioeconomic inequality was assessed using both organized and opportunistic screening according to income and educational level.

Methods

GC screening data were obtained from the 2009-2022 Korean National Cancer Screening Survey. The final analysis included 47,163 cancer-free men and women. The weighted cancer screening rate was estimated using joinpoint regression. The inequality indices were measured in terms of both the absolute slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII) using the Poisson regression model.

Results

The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [-3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), -7.63-0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69-11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59-2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. Furthermore, income inequality was not found in organized GC screening; however, overall SII and RII for opportunistic screening were 7.72% (95% CI, 5.39-10.5) and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.42-1.81), respectively.

Conclusion

Organized screening rates have grown gradually over time and account for the majority of GC screenings in South Korea. While no socioeconomic inequalities were found in organized screening, significant socioeconomic inequalities were found in opportunistic screening.

A Novel Prognostic Biomarker CCR8 for Gastric Cancer and Anti-CCR8 Blockade Attenuate the Immunosuppressive Capacity of Tregs In Vitro

Objective: To investigate the immunotherapeutic roles and functions of C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 8 (CCR8) molecule in gastric cancer (GC). Materials and Methods: Clinicopathological features of 95 GC cases were collected by a follow-up survey. The expression level of CCR8 was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and analyzed with the cancer genome atlas database. The relationship between CCR8 expression and Clinicopathological features of GC cases was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Flow cytometry was used to determine the expression of cytokines and the proliferation of CD4+ regulator T cells (Tregs) and CD8+ T cells. Results: An upregulated expression of CCR8 in GC tissues was associated with tumor grade, nodal metastasis, and overall survival (OS). Tumor-infiltrated Tregs with higher expression of CCR8 produced more IL10 molecules in vitro. In addition, anti-CCR8 blocking downregulated IL10 expression produced by CD4+ Tregs, and reversed the suppression by Tregs on the secretion and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. Conclusion: CCR8 molecule could be a prognostic biomarker for GC cases and a therapeutic target for immune treatments.

Risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer and death in persons with negative screening results: results from the National Cancer Screening Program in South Korea

BACKGROUND

The Korea National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) offers upper endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) biannually for people aged ≥ 40 years. This study aimed to assess the effect of negative screening results on the incidence of and mortality from upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort of 15,850,288 men and women was constructed using data from 3 national databases. The participants were followed until the end of 2017 for data on cancer incidence and in 2019 for data on the vital status. Cox proportional hazard model with time-varying exposure was used to assess the association.

RESULTS

By the end of the follow-up period, 230,783 upper GI cancer cases and 99,348 upper GI cancer deaths were recorded. Negative gastric cancer screening was significantly associated with a lower risk of upper GI cancer in both UGIS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.80-0.82) and upper endoscopy (aHR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.67-0.68) groups. The HRs for upper GI mortality were 0.55 (95% CI = 0.54-0.56) and 0.21 (95% CI = 0.21-0.22) for the UGIS and upper endoscopy groups, respectively. The most significant reductions in the risk of upper GI cancer (UGIS: aHR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.74-0.77; upper endoscopy: aHR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.59-0.61) and death (UGIS: aHR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.52-0.55; upper endoscopy: aHR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.19-0.20) were observed among individual aged 60-69 years.

CONCLUSION

Negative screening cases, especially in upper endoscopy of the KNCSP, were associated with an overall reduction in the risk of and mortality from upper GI cancer.

The NCC mathematical modeling framework for decision-making of six major cancers

Objective

Mathematical modeling and simulation is a useful research method to inform decision-making. This article aims to describe the National Cancer Center (NCC) modeling framework and how well it reproduces observed empirical data for six major cancers.

Methods

We developed the NCC modeling framework for six major cancers in China (lung, liver, stomach, colorectal, esophageal, and breast), which simulates the life-histories represented by states among normal, precancerous lesion, stage-specific invasive cancer, and death for six cancers separately. Each NCC simulation model could be illustrated as an integrated framework of 3 modules: a demography module, natural history module, and screening module. Combined with costs and health utilities data, the models could have many detailed outputs for informing decisions, including the harm of screening (e.g., false positives, complications, and overdiagnosis), healthcare costs, and benefits (quality-adjusted life years gained, cancer incidence and mortality, and investment returns). We calibrated the models to Chinese population-based observations on cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution. All models are validated by comparing model simulated results to data observed from nationwide cancer registration and a large prospective cohort study.

Results

The simulated results from the calibrated models consistently match the epidemiological patterns in six major cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distributions in China. Model projected age-specific cancer incidence and mortality were close to the observed data in the national cancer registration. The NCC modeling framework reproduced the cumulative cancer cases and deaths observed in the prospective cohort study at 7.0 and 10.8 years of follow-up. Model estimated net survival rates also consistent with population-based statistics.

Conclusion

The NCC modeling framework's ability to reproduce the observed population-level cancer statistics and the cancer cases in a prospective cohort study suggests its results are reliable to inform decision-making related to six major cancers in China.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gastric Cancer Screening in South Korea: Results From the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (2017-2021)

PURPOSE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly disrupted cancer screening services worldwide. We aimed to measure the impact of COVID-19 on gastric cancer screening rates based on age, sex, household income, and residential area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey from 2017 to 2021 for adults aged 40-74 years. We evaluated the gastric cancer screening rate within two years in accordance with the National Cancer Screening Program protocol recommendations and that within the previous year. We compared the trends in the pre- and post-COVID-19 outbreak periods.

RESULTS

Before the COVID-19 outbreak, there was little change in the gastric cancer screening rates until 2019. After the COVID-19 outbreak, the screening rate as per recommendation decreased from 70.8% in 2019 to 68.9% in 2020 and that for one year decreased from 32.7% in 2019 to 27.2% in 2020. However, as the COVID-19 pandemic continued after 2020, both gastric cancer screening rates as per recommendations and for one year rebounded. Although a similar trend was observed for the upper endoscopy screening rate, the upper gastrointestinal series screening rate decreased from 7.8% in 2020 to 3.1% in 2021. During the pandemic, the screening rate decreased among younger adults (40-49), those residing in metropolitan regions, and those with high incomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a decline in gastric cancer screening rate during the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate surged in 2021. Further studies are needed to estimate the impact of cancer screening delays on future cancer-related mortalities.

Decreasing Incidence of Gastric Cancer with Increasing Time after Helicobacter pylori Treatment: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori (HP) has been shown to reduce the risk of gastric cancer (GC) development. However, previous studies have focused on patients at high risk of GC. This study aimed to assess the effect of HP treatment on the incidence of GC in the general population. Materials and Methods: Medical records were obtained from the Common Data Model-converted sample Cohort of the National Health Insurance Service of Korea (NHIS-CDM). The target cohort included those who had been prescribed HP treatment and the comparator cohort included those who had not. The association between HP treatment and the risk of GC development was assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model. The incidences of GC according to the period after HP treatment in different age groups were analyzed using proportional trend tests. Results: After large-scale 1:4 propensity score matching, 2735 and 5328 individuals were included in the target and comparator cohorts, respectively. During the median follow-up of 6.5 years, the GC incidence was lower in the HP treatment cohort than in the comparator cohort, but this was statistically insignificant (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50−1.13; p-value = 0.19). This trend was also observed among the older age (≥65 years, HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.44−1.68; p-value = 0.69) and male cohorts (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.51−1.27; p-value = 0.38). Among 58,684 individuals who were treated for HP from the whole NHIS-CDM cohort, the incidence of GC consistently decreased over time and showed a marked decrease with increasing age (p for trend < 0.05). Conclusions: In all age groups of the general population, HP treatment could be recommended to reduce the risk of GC.