Epidural ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus tramadol in postoperative analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal surgery: a comparison

Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Levobupivacaine with Tramadol or Morphine Addition on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Abdominal Surgery

Objective

The study was designed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural tramadol or epidural morphine as adjuvant to levobupivacaine in major abdominal surgery.

Methods

Patients in ASA I-II group aged between 18 and 65 years were included in study. Epidural catheter was introduced. Patients were randomised into three groups to receive levobupivacaine (Group L), levobupivacaine+morphine (Group LM) and levobupivacaine+tramadol (Group LT). General anaesthesia was administered to all patients. The solution intended for Group L contained 25 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine+15 mL saline, that for Group LM contained 25 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine+14.5 mL salin+100 μg morphine and that for Group LT contained 25 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine+13 mL salin+100 mg tramadol, which was administered via epidural catheter as loading dose 30 min before the end of the operation. Patient-controlled analgesia device was connected to the epidural catheter to provide postoperative analgesia. Bolus dose was adjusted to 12 mg levobupivacaine in Group L, 12 mg levobupivacaine +1.2 mg morphine in Group LM and 12 mg levobupivacaine+12 mg tramadol in Group LT. Lock-out period was adjusted to 15 min in three groups. Quality of analgesia was evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale; administered and demand doses of levobupivacaine, morphine and tramadol were compared at 30 min, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively.

Results

Visual Analogue Scale scores were significantly higher in Group L than Groups LM and LT. Nausea and vomiting observed in Group L were lesser than those in Groups LM and LT.

Conclusion

Continuous epidural analgesia using levobupivacaine combined with morphine or tramadol is an effective method for managing postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgery.

Adjuvants in pediatric regional anesthesia

SUMMARY Local anesthetics have a limited duration of action. Adjuvants are used to prolong the duration of action and to augment analgesia allowing lower concentrations of local anesthetic to be used. Adjuvants have been used more extensively with neuraxial blocks, particularly caudal epidural blocks, but more recently to supplement peripheral nerve blocks. Intrathecal adjuvants are not covered in this review since spinal anesthesia is not widely used in children except in ex-premature infants. Morphine is the historical gold-standard with which other adjuvants are compared. Clonidine is most useful and is becoming increasingly popular, while the side-effect profile of other agents reduces their utility. Concerns with regard to the neurotoxicity of ketamine in animal models has led to its withdrawal in some countries.

Contributions of peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal actions to analgesia

Pain signaling involves several main compartments that can be considered as potential sites for analgesic drug actions. When drugs are given systemically, they can act at spinal, supraspinal and peripheral sites, and several methods have been developed for identifying where they act. These include (1) localized delivery of drugs to specific sites (via intracerebral, intrathecal, and intraplantar injections), (2) systemic delivery of drugs with localized delivery of antagonists for the receptor on which the drug acts or for a system recruited by the drug, (3) use of peripherally restricted analogs, and (4) use of conditional knockout technology to selectively deplete receptors on nociceptors. Delivery of drugs simultaneously to several sites (spinal/supraspinal, peripheral/spinal, and peripheral/supraspinal) reveals "self-synergy" between sites for some agents. Knowledge of peripheral contributions to drug actions is important because of the potential to develop peripherally restricted analgesics (with a diminished side effect profile due to not entering the central nervous system), the potential to deliver drugs peripherally (e.g. topically) to act on sensory nerve endings and adjacent tissue (with a diminished side effect profile due to limited systemic absorption), and the potential to use combinations of topical and oral drug regimens to obtain improved pain relief (without increasing the side effect burden). This review considers methods used for compartmental analysis, and results of such site analysis for several major classes of analgesic drugs that are in current use.

Perioperative epidural analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal tumor surgery--a single center experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of continuous epidural analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing major abdominal tumor surgery.

METHODS

Children undergoing major abdominal tumor surgery at our institution between 2008 and 2012 (n=40) received continuous epidural analgesia via an epidural catheter. Surgical trauma scores, pain scores, and clinical data of the children were compared to a pair-matched historical control group operated on between 2002 and 2007 without epidural analgesia.

RESULTS

Pain levels in the study group on day 1 and 3 after surgery were lower compared to the control group. The differences did, however, not reach statistical significance (p=0.15 and 0.09). Children in the study group received significantly fewer additional doses of piritramide or morphine (45% versus 82%, p<0.001). Despite significantly higher surgical trauma scores in the study group (p=0.018), there were no statistical differences regarding clinical parameters, such as mechanical ventilation time, time on intensive care unit, and total hospital stay. There were no catheter-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous epidural analgesia is beneficial for children undergoing complex abdominal tumor surgery with regard to pain levels, postoperative recovery, and general clinical course. Expertise of the managing team, a careful patient selection, and a continuous quality assessment are essential for success.