Rocuronium Bromide Intravenous Solution Maruishi® is more suitable than ESLAX Intravenous® during rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia

[Simultaneous determination of three quaternary ammonium muscle relaxants in blood by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry]

Vecuronium, rocuronium, and pancuronium are widely used as non-depolarizing muscle relaxants. There have been occasional cases of allergic reactions and even death when using such muscle relaxants. Rapid determination of the concentration of these muscle relaxants in blood can provide valuable information for early clinical diagnosis. As quaternary ammonium compounds, these muscle relaxants are highly polar. Hence, they cannot be retained effectively on reversed-phase chromatographic columns with conventional mobile phases. These quaternary ammonium muscle relaxants are mainly separated by ion-pair chromatography. Using an ion-pairing reagent can help improve the retention capabilities of quaternary ammonium muscle relaxants. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of MS detection is significantly decreased because of ionic inhibition caused by the ion-pairing reagent in the mobile phase. Furthermore, ion-pairing reagents can pollute the MS system. A method based on high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was established for the simultaneous determination of the three quaternary ammonium muscle relaxants in blood. The blood samples were diluted and subjected to high-speed centrifugation. The supernatant was purified on a Bond Elut AL-N solid phase extraction column and then filtered through a 0.45 μm microporous membrane. The quaternary ammonium muscle relaxants were separated on a ZIC-cHILIC analytical column (50 mm×2.1 mm, 3.0 μm) with gradient elution. Acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution were used as mobile phases. The separated compounds were analyzed by tandem MS with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source in positive and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. The matrix effects of vecuronium, rocuronium, and pancuronium in blood were 88.1% to 95.4%. The calibration curves for vecuronium, rocuronium, and pancuronium showed good linear relationships in each range, and all correlation coefficients (R2) were > 0.996. The limits of detection of vecuronium, rocuronium, and pancuronium were 0.2-0.8 ng/mL, with the corresponding limits of quantification being 0.5-2.0 ng/mL. The recoveries of vecuronium, rocuronium, and pancuronium were 92.8% to 110.6%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 3.2%-9.4%. This method is sensitive, accurate, and easy to operate, and it can be used to rapidly determine vecuronium, rocuronium, and pancuronium in blood.

Generic rocuronium reduces withdrawal movements compared to original rocuronium under target-controlled infusion induction with propofol

PURPOSE

Rocuronium-induced injection pain often causes withdrawal movements leading to accidental disruption of indwelling needles. Generic rocuronium (Maruishi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan) with a novel solution has been reported to reduce the injection pain compared to original rocuronium [Esmeron^® (Eslax^®), MSD Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan], however, no reports have compared the injection pain under sedation with propofol, the most frequently used general anesthetic. This study was carried out to compare the injection pain caused by generic rocuronium and that caused by original rocuronium in patients anesthetized by propofol with a target-controlled infusion system.

METHODS

Forty patients were randomly assigned to two groups in this single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. One group was administered generic rocuronium after sedation with propofol with a target-controlled infusion system. The other group was administered original rocuronium after anesthesia with propofol. Patient's withdrawal movements were assessed with the scale. The primary outcome was the total incidence of movement after administration of rocuronium. Secondary outcome was the incidence of moderate or severe movement after administration of rocuronium.

RESULTS

The total incidence of movement after administration of generic rocuronium (11%) was significantly lower than that after the administration of original rocuronium (79%) (p < 0.01). The incidence of moderate or severe movement after administration of generic rocuronium (0%) was significantly lower than that after the administration of original rocuronium (53%) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Generic rocuronium was considered more suitable than the original rocuronium for induction of anesthesia by propofol performed with a target-controlled infusion system.