Feasibility of ultrasound-guided lumbar epidural access using paramedian transverse scanning with the needle in-plane: a comparison with paramedian sagittal scanning

Performance of the ratio of posterior complex length to depth measured by ultrasound as a predictor of difficult spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Ultrasound view of the interlaminar structure is likely to be associated with difficult spinal anesthesia (DSA), and a poor ultrasound view which cannot show the anterior and posterior complex predicts a difficult spinal technique. As our target site is the posterior complex, this study aimed to assess whether the ratio of posterior complex length to depth measured by ultrasound can predict DSA in cesarean delivery.

METHODS

Four anesthesiologists with 1-2 years of experience located and marked the puncture interspace using a traditional surface landmark. Subsequently, the ultrasound examiner located and measured the marked interspace via an oblique parasagittal ultrasound scan. The anesthesiologists, who were blinded to the ultrasound results, performed spinal anesthesia using a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. The total number of attempts, including skin punctures and needle passes, was recorded and the DSA was defined as 10 unsuccessful attempts. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors, and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the performance of the ratio of posterior complex length to depth for predicting DSA.

RESULTS

A total of 397 cesarean delivery parturients with successfully measured posterior complex were included in the analysis. DSA occurred in 64 parturients (16.1%). Reduced length [odds ratio (OR) = 0.010, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.002-0.062, P < 0.001] and increased depth [OR = 6.127, 95% CI, 2.671-14.056, P < 0.001] of the posterior complex were independently predictive of DSA compared with body mass index, abdominal circumference, and palpable surface landmarks. The ratio of posterior complex length to depth for predicting DSA had an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.90). The optimal cutoff was 0.23, with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 74-93%) and specificity of 72% (95% CI, 67-77%).

CONCLUSION

The ratio of posterior complex length to depth measured by ultrasound demonstrated a considerable accuracy in predicting DSA for inexperienced anesthesiologists. A higher ratio at ultrasound is an indication to evaluate the optimal puncture body position and interspace in the clinic practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200065171 https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=180855.

Landmark-guided versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia Techniques: Paramedian Sagittal Oblique and Transverse Interlaminar Approach

Background

There are different types of real-time ultrasound (US)-guided combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia techniques. We aimed to investigate the effect of real-time US-guided paramedian sagittal oblique (PSO), transverse interlaminar (TI) approach method, and landmark-guided (LG) CSE anesthesia.

Methods

Ninety patients who underwent CSE block were included in the study. Patients were randomized into LG (n = 30), PSO (n = 30), and TI (n = 30) groups. The primary outcome was number of needle manipulations. The secondary outcomes are the number of attempts, needle visibility, procedure time, procedure success rate, catheter placement difficulty, posterior complex distance, and complications.

Results

The number of needle manipulations was statistically significantly lower in the LG technique group (P < 0.000). When the number of attempts, the difficulty of catheter placement, and the procedure's success rate were compared between the three groups, we did not find a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). In addition, when the procedure times were compared, the time measured for the LG group was statistically significantly lower than in the PSO and TI groups (P < 0.000).

Conclusion

In the results of this study, the real-time US-guided CSE anesthesia application had a similar success and complication level with LG technique. The LG method had a shorter processing time and fewer needle manipulations.

Confirming identification of the epidural space: a systematic review of electric stimulation, pressure waveform analysis, and ultrasound and a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in acute pain

To review the use of epidural electric stimulation test, pressure waveform analysis, and ultrasound assessment of injection as bedside methods for confirming identification of the epidural space in adults with acute pain, the PubMed database was searched for relevant reports between May and August 2022. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy with conventional Touhy needles and epidural catheters were further selected for meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated using univariate logistic regression for electric stimulation and pressure analysis, and pooling of similar studies for ultrasound. Risk of bias and applicability was assessed using QUADAS-2. For electric stimulation, pressure waveform analysis, and ultrasound, respectively 35, 22, and 28 reports were included in the review and 9, 9, and 7 studies in the meta-analysis. Electric stimulation requires wire-reinforced catheters and an adequate nerve stimulator, does not reliably identify intravascular placement, and is affected by local anaesthetics. Sensitivity was 95% (95% CI 93-96%, N = 550) and specificity unknown (95% CI 33-94%, N = 44). Pressure waveform analysis is unaffected by local anaesthetics, but does not identify intravascular nor intrathecal catheters. Sensitivity was 90% (95% CI 72-97%, N = 694) and specificity 88% (95% CI 78-94%, N = 67). B-mode, M-mode and doppler ultrasound may be challenging, and data is still limited. Risk of bias was significant and accuracy estimates must be interpreted with caution. Electric stimulation and pressure waveform analysis seem clinically useful, although they must be interpreted cautiously. In the future, clinical trials in patients with difficult anatomy will likely be most useful. Ultrasound requires further investigation.

Dual- vs. Single-Plane Ultrasonic Scan-Assisted Positioning during Lumbar Spinal Puncture in Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of single- versus dual-plane ultrasound scan-assisted spinal anesthesia techniques to improve the success rate and efficacy of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. A total of 120 elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery were randomly assigned to either receive single-plane (Group A) or dual-plane ultrasonic scan-assisted spinal anesthesia (Group B). The primary outcome analyzed by this study was first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes analyzed included number of needle insertion attempts, needle redirections, locating time, procedural time, total time, puncture depth, quality of ultrasound images, level of block, adverse reactions, and complications. The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (88.3% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.008). In comparison with Group A, the number of needle insertion attempts (1 (1−2) vs. 1 (1−1), p = 0.005) and needle redirections (2 (1−3) vs. 1 (0−2), p < 0.001) were both significantly lower in Group B; Group B also had a shorter procedural time (249.2 ± 30.1 vs. 380.4 ± 39.4 s, p < 0.001) but a longer locating time (250.1 ± 26.2 vs. 137.8 ± 13.5 s, p < 0.001). The dual-plane ultrasonic scan-assisted spinal anesthesia technique warrants consideration for application in elderly patients.

Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Traditional landmark-guided spinal anesthesia can be challenging in elderly patients with hip fractures. Ultrasound assistance (USAS) and real-time ultrasound guidance (USRTG) techniques can facilitate lumbar neuraxial blocks. However, it remains undetermined which method is optimal for use in elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate which technique was associated with a higher success rate of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with hip fractures: USAS or USRTG technique.

METHODS

A total of 114 elderly patients (≥70 years of age) with hip fractures were randomly assigned to receive spinal anesthesia using either the USAS or USRTG technique. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, analyzed using the χ2 test. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, the number of needle attempts and passes, locating time, procedure time, total time, adverse reactions and complications, patient satisfaction, and procedural difficulty score.

RESULTS

The first-attempt success rate (80.7% vs 52.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], for the difference, 11.6-44.6) and first-pass success rate (63.2% vs 31.6%; 95% CI for the difference, 14.2-49) were both significantly higher in the USAS compared with the USRTG group (both P = .001). The number of attempts (1 [1-1] vs 1 [1-3]; P = .001) and median passes (1 vs 3; P < .001) were both significantly lower in the USAS group than in the USRTG group. The USRTG group had a shorter locating time (175 seconds [129-234 seconds] vs 315 seconds [250-390 seconds]; P < .001) but a longer procedure time (488 seconds [260-972 seconds] vs 200 seconds [127-328 seconds]; P < .001) and total time (694 seconds [421-1133 seconds] vs 540 seconds [432-641 seconds]; P = .036). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to the adverse reactions and complications. More patients in the USAS group had a high satisfaction score of 3 to 5 (P = .008). Overall, anesthesiologists rated the USRTG group procedure as "more difficult" (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with hip fractures, spinal anesthesia with the USRTG technique is not superior to the USAS technique since it has a lower success rate, longer procedure time, lower satisfaction score, and is more difficult to perform. So USAS technique may be more suitable for elderly patients.

A Modified Approach Below the Lateral Arcuate Ligament to Facilitate the Subcostal Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block

Purpose

The subcostal quadratus lumborum (QL) block was used in postoperative analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, it is difficult to precisely put the needle tip into the target fascia compartment. In the current study, we proposed a modified approach to facilitate the subcostal QL block.

Patients and Methods

Twenty-four patients scheduled for laparoscopic renal surgery were enrolled. The modified QL block was placed preoperatively. The transducer was placed just laterally to the tip of L1 transverse process to perform the parasagittal scan. The needle was inserted in-plane and advanced toward the target compartment between the QL muscle and the anterior thoracolumbar fascia and just below the lateral arcuate ligament. The 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected slowly if the saline spread cranially via the posterior pathway of lateral arcuate ligament was observed on the sonogram. Then, the paramedian transverse scanning at the level of T12-L1 was performed to observe the injectate diffusion. The dermatomal coverage of sensory block was tested at 5 min and 10 min after LA injections. The complications associated with the block were recorded.

Results

Twenty-three (95.8%) patients received the successful block. All patients achieved the sensory block dermatomes of T9–T12 and T6–L1, at 5 and 10 minutes after injection, respectively. The mean numbers of block dermatomes were 5.6±1.8 at 5 min and 6.5±2.2 at 10 min after injection. Two out of twenty-three (8.7%) patients achieved coverage as cephalad as T5 at 10 min after injections. The lunar-shaped spread of LA along the diaphragm into the T12 paravertebral space was observed in every patient. No complications occurred.

Conclusion

The modified subcostal QL block has the advantages of clear sonoanatomy, rapid onset time, and consistent dermatomal coverage and provides a new choice for postoperative analgesia of abdominal surgery.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000029210.

Chinese Association for the Study of Pain: Experts consensus on ultrasound-guided injections for the treatment of spinal pain in China (2020 edition)

Spinal pain (SP) is a common condition that has a major negative impact on a patient’s quality of life. Recent developments in ultrasound-guided injections for the treatment of SP are increasingly being used in clinical practice. This clinical expert consensus describes the purpose, significance, implementation methods, indications, contraindications, and techniques of ultrasound-guided injections. This consensus offers a practical reference point for physicians to implement successfully ultrasound-guided injections in the treatment of chronic SP.