Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al

Is polymethyl methacrylate a viable option for salvaging lateral mass screw failure in the subaxial cervical spine?

Study Design Biomechanical analysis of lateral mass screw pullout strength. Objective We compare the pullout strength of our bone cement-revised lateral mass screw with the standard lateral mass screw. Methods In cadaveric cervical spines, we simulated lateral mass screw "cutouts" unilaterally from C3 to C7. We salvaged fixation in the cutout side with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or Cortoss cement (Orthovita, Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States), allowed the cement to harden, and then drilled and placed lateral mass screws back into the cement-augmented lateral masses. On the contralateral side, we placed standard lateral mass screws into the native, or normal lateral, masses and then compared pullout strength of the cement-augmented side to the standard lateral mass screw. For pullout testing, each augmentation group was fixed to a servohydraulic load frame and a specially designed pullout fixture was attached to each lateral mass screw head. Results Quick-mix PMMA-salvaged lateral mass screws required greater force to fail when compared with native lateral mass screws. Cortoss cement and PMMA standard-mix cement-augmented screws demonstrated less strength of fixation when compared with control-side lateral mass screws. Attempts at a second round of cement salvage of the same lateral masses led to more variations in load to failure, but quick-mix PMMA again demonstrated greater load to failure when compared with the nonaugmented control lateral mass screws. Conclusion Quick-mix PMMA cement revision equips the spinal surgeon with a much needed salvage option for a failed lateral mass screw in the subaxial cervical spine.

Cost effectiveness of subaxial fusion--lateral mass screws versus transarticular facet screws

As health care reform continues to evolve, demonstrating the cost effectiveness of spinal fusion procedures will be of critical value. Posterior subaxial cervical fusion with lateral mass screw and rod instrumentation is a well-established fixation technique. Subaxial transarticular facet fixation is a lesser known fusion technique that has been shown to be biomechanically equivalent to lateral mass screws for short constructs. Although there has not been a widespread adoption of transarticular facet screws, the screws potentially represent a cost-effective alternative to lateral mass rod and screw constructs. In this review, the authors describe an institutional experience with the use of lateral mass screws and provide a theoretical cost comparison with the use of transarticular facet screws.

A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation

STUDY DESIGN

This is a biomechanical study evaluating 3 revision strategies for failed cervical lateral mass screw fixation.

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to compare, following a Magerl trajectory screw failure in the subaxial cervical spine, the pullout strength of (1) a revision screw in the same trajectory, (2) a Roy-Camille trajectory, and (3) pedicle screw fixation. We additionally analyzed the contributions of bone mineral density (BMD) and peak insertional torque to pullout strength.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Biomechanical studies that have examined revision screw strategies for lateral mass fixation have found either unsatisfactory or highly variable performance.

METHODS

Fresh frozen cervical spinal segments were harvested and BMD testing performed. Bicortical (3.5-mm Vertex) lateral mass screws were placed in a Magerl trajectory in 57 fresh frozen human subaxial cervical vertebrae. All screws were then stripped and revision screws (4.0-mm Vertex) placed using either the same screw path or conversion to a Roy-Camille trajectory. In line pullout testing was performed on each of the revision screws (57 in Magerl revision group, 55 in Roy-Camille). Specimens that had not fractured during testing then had cervical pedicle screws (3.5-mm Vertex) placed and in-line pullout testing repeated (64 pedicles were instrumented) The pullout failure results of the Magerl revision, Roy-Camille revision, and pedicle screw revision groups were compared.

RESULTS

No significant difference was noted in insertional torque (0.28-Nm Magerl, 0.35 Nm Roy-Camille, P > 0.05) or pullout (382-N Magerl, 351 N Roy-Camille, P > 0.05) between the Magerl and Roy-Camille revision groups. Pedicle screw revision had greater pullout strength (566 N) when compared with either the Magerl (382 N) or Roy-Camille (351 N) revision groups (P < 0.01) but also had a 20% pedicle wall breech rate by visual inspection. Insertional torque and pullout strength increased with increased BMD and were significantly correlated in all 3 revision groups (P < 0.05). Similarly, increased BMD was associated with increased pullout strength as demonstrated by the significant positive correlation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conversion of a stripped lateral mass screw to an alternate trajectory appears to offer no biomechanical advantage over placement of an increased diameter salvage screw using the same trajectory. Pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical fixation but was associated with a significant breech rate.

Mri-Based Morphological Predictorsof Spect Positive Facet Arthropathyin Patients With Axial Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

A major barrier to understanding facetogenic low back pain has been the lack of radiographic diagnostic criteria. This study investigates the correlation between radiographic findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) scans in patients clinically found to have facetogenic axial back pain.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with severe axial back pain underwent lumbar MRI and SPECT scans. Two hundred thirty facets were identified and were graded from 1 to 4 using synovial area, size, cartilaginous discontiguity, osteophytic overgrowth, and joint space obliteration. Twenty-nine "hot" joints were identified on SPECT scans. MRI features of 230 lumbar facets were correlated with SPECT results.

RESULTS

Four basic morphological patterns were identified on the basis of synovial appearance on MRI scans, light, mottled, narrowed, and obliterated, and formed the basis for the grading 1 to 4, respectively (sensitivity for "hot facet", 0.93). The mottled group had 0.90 specificity (P = 0.0001). Osteophytic overgrowth demonstrated 0.94 specificity (P = 0.0004). Facet hypertrophy was not associated with increased tracer uptake.

CONCLUSION

We identify four types of synovial architecture on T2-weighted MRI scans with overall high sensitivity for predicting SPECT positivity. These four grades likely represent a continuum of facet degeneration, from a normal to obliterated joint. One particular subtype, Grade 2, demonstrated a high specificity for SPECT and synovial fluid increase suggestive of inflammation. Facet hypertrophy was not predictive of bone scan positivity, perhaps suggesting the protective nature of a hypertrophied facet. Synovial abnormalities correlate with SPECT findings and a grading scale is proposed delineating the degeneration of a lumbar facet over time. A subtype of SPECT(+) inflamed joint is proposed. Further studies will be needed to improve our understanding of the natural history of the lumbar facet.

Effectiveness of cemented rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation

OBJECT

Among the various ways to optimize the fixation of bone implants is to use bone cement, for example, in a total hip prosthesis. No data exist, however, concerning the effectiveness of cemented rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether cemented rescue screws increase fixation strength in comparison with uncemented standard screws.

METHODS

Six cervical spine segments (C4-7) were explanted during routine autopsy studies from fresh human cadavers. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured for each vertebral body (VB) using quantitative computerized tomography scanning, and 24 VBs were dissected from the segments. Two initial pilot holes were drilled into each VB parallel to the sagittal plane. Based on their BMD, the specimens were assigned to one of two groups in which torque and pullout force were tested. The test was begun with standard screws and was repeated with cannulated slotted rescue screws into which bone cement was injected. The mean values of peak torque and pullout forces resulting from the left and right measurements were used for statistical analysis. A t-test was performed to determine the effect of screw type on peak torque and pullout force. Moment correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the effect of BMD on peak torque and pullout force for each type of screw. The mean insertional peak torque was 67.1 N/cm for the standard screw and 102.6 N/cm for the cemented screw (p < 0.05). The mean pullout force was 526.9 N for standard osteoporosis screws and 531.5 N for cemented screws (p > 0.05). The effect of increased holding strength as measured by peak torque and pullout force was more pronounced in the presence of low bone density.

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented rescue screws that have been inserted into a fatigued pilot hole in the cervical VB strengthen the screw-bone interface compared with the strength initially conferred by a standard screw.

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Pullout Strength of Cervical Screws

OBJECTIVE

In the process of anterior cervical fusion, little is known about the biomechanics of anterior cervical screw pullout. In this study, three different aspects of cervical screw fixation were evaluated: self-tapping (ST) versus self-drilling (SD) screws, the effect of screw geometry (length, diameter, thread pitch), and the use of rescue screws.

METHODS

Nine screws consisting of different diameters, lengths, and thread pitch (cancellous and cortical) were tested in peak pullout force in an artificial bone model using an MTS 858 Mini Bionix test system. Rescue screws (4.5 mm) were then inserted in the failed holes of 4.0-mm screws and extracted to determine their holding strength.

RESULTS

Length of screws and thread pitch both had a significant effect on the pullout force. Each 1 mm of increased screw length translates to 16 N of increased force to pullout in the foam bone model. Pullout strength did not vary significantly according to screw diameter or between SD and ST screws. However, the SD screw has an advantage because it can decrease the length of surgery. A decrease in pullout force of between 43% and 70% was found when using rescue screws.

CONCLUSIONS

In situations in which the use of rescue/salvage screws is required, the surgeon should anticipate a significant decrease in the holding force compared with the original screw. Future directions for research include an evaluation of pullout force for screw and plate constructs.