Left iliac artery injury during anterior lumbar spine surgery diagnosed by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Development of multidisciplinary, evidenced-based protocol recommendations and implementation strategies for anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery following a literature review

The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure involves several surgical specialties, including general, vascular, and spinal surgery due to its unique approach and anatomy involved. It also carries its own set of complications that differentiate it from posterior lumbar fusion surgeries. The demonstrated benefits of treatment guidelines, such as Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in other surgical procedures, and the lack of current recommendations regarding the anterior approach, underscores the need to develop protocols that specifically address the complexities of ALIF. We aimed to create an evidence-based protocol for pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of ALIF patients and implementation strategies for our health system. A 12-member multidisciplinary workgroup convened to develop an evidence-based treatment protocol for ALIF using a Delphi consensus methodology and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system for rating the quality of evidence and strength of protocol recommendations. The quality of evidence, strength of the recommendation and specific implementation strategies for Methodist Health System for each recommendation were described. The literature search resulted in 295 articles that were included in the development of protocol recommendations. No disagreements remained once the authors reviewed the final GRADE assessment of the quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations. Ultimately, there were 39 protocol recommendations, with 16 appropriate preoperative protocol recommendations (out of 17 proposed), 9 appropriate intraoperative recommendations, and 14 appropriate postoperative recommendations. This novel set of evidence-based recommendations is designed to optimize the patient's ALIF experience from the preoperative to the postoperative period.

Prevention of Neurological Deficit With Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

While intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been increasingly used in spine surgery to have a real-time evaluation of the neurological injury, we aim here to assess its utility during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and its association with postoperative neurological deficit.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ALIF is a beneficial surgical approach for patients with degenerative disease of the lower lumbar spine who would benefit from increased lordosis and restoration of neuroforaminal height. One risk of ALIF is iatrogenic nerve root injury. IONM may be useful in preventing this injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 111 consecutive patients who underwent ALIF at a tertiary care academic center by 6 spine surgeons. We aimed to describe the association between IONM, postoperative weakness, and factors that predispose our center to using IONM.

RESULTS

The 111 patients had a median age of 62 years [interquartile range (IQR): 53-69 y]. Neuromonitoring was used in 67 patients (60.3%) and not used in 44 patients. Seven neuromonitoring patients had IONM changes during the surgery. Three of these patients' surgeries featured intraoperative adjustments to reduce iatrogenic neural injury. The IONM cohort underwent significantly more complex procedures [5 levels (IQR: 3-7) vs. 2 levels (IQR: 2-5), P=0.001]. There was no difference in rates of new or worsened postoperative weakness (IONM: 20.6%, non-IONM: 20.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate evidence of the potential benefits of IONM for patients undergoing ALIF. Intraoperative changes in neuromonitoring signals resulted in surgical adjustments that likely prevented neurological deficits postoperatively. IONM was protective so that more complex surgeries did not have a higher rate of postoperative weakness.

Vascular Injury in Elective Anterior Surgery of the Lumbar Spine: A Narrative Review

The incidence of anterior lumbar surgery is increasing as the population is aging. Although adverse events regarding vasculature injury are uncommon, several have been described in the current literature. Complications can be categorized based on the time of occurrence, more specifically intraoperative or postoperative, but also regarding the nature of vascular damage such as thrombosis, occlusion, or rupture. The rate of complications is higher in the setting of revision anterior surgery than with primary anterior lumbar surgery. Moreover, the incidence of revision anterior surgery is also increasing in contrast to the past. Through this narrative review, an effort is made for a thorough understanding of the complications associated with anterior lumbar surgery, which will aid in the prevention, recognition, and management of this rare complication.

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion

Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is commonly used during lumbar fusion surgery for the prevention of nerve root injury. Justification for its use stems from the belief that IOM can prevent nerve root injury during the placement of pedicle screws. A thorough literature review was conducted to determine if the use of IOM could prevent nerve root injury during the placement of instrumentation in lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. There is no evidence to date that IOM can prevent injury to the nerve roots. There is limited evidence that a threshold below 5 mA from direct stimulation of the screw can indicate a medial pedicle breach by the screw. Unfortunately, once a nerve root injury has taken place, changing the direction of the screw does not alter the outcome. The recommendations formulated in the original guideline effort are neither supported nor refuted with the evidence obtained with the current studies.

Somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring detects iliac artery occlusion during posterior spinal fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Report of a rare case of iliac artery occlusion occurring during posterior spinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify causes of an acute occlusion of iliac vessels during posterior spinal surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Acute embolic occlusion of the iliac artery is a medical and surgical emergency. Iatrogenic occlusion of major vessels to the lower extremities during posterior lumbar spine operation is a rare entity.

METHODS

We report this complication occurring during decompression and fusion in a 55-year-old female with history of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and multivessels vascular disease. The application of somatosensory evoked potentials during this case detected an asymmetry of cortical responses due to low blood flow to the affected limb.

RESULTS

This patient underwent endovascular intervention and placement of stents to restore the flow to the limbs.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to assume that continuous and direct pressure on the inguinal region during surgery on Jackson table was the primary cause of the iliac artery occlusion, particularly in these patients with known peripheral vascular disease. Early recognition and prompt vascular intervention can prevent serious sequelae.