Preferential superior surface motion in wear simulations of the Charité total disc replacement

Spinal implant wear particles: Generation, characterization, biological impacts, and future considerations

The generation of wear debris from orthopedic implants is a known cause of implant failure, particularly in joint replacements. While much research has focused on wear particles from knee and hip implants, spinal implants, such as total disc replacements (TDRs), have received less attention despite their increasing clinical use. Spinal implants face unique biomechanical challenges, including a wider range of motion and higher loads, leading to complex tissue interactions. Studies reveal that TDR wear particles, though similar in size to those from knee implants, cause a stronger immune response, with more macrophages and giant cells found in the surrounding tissue. This may explain the high revision rates seen in spinal surgeries, with some interventions failing in over 30% of cases within 10 years. The younger population undergoing spinal surgery, combined with the productivity losses associated with implant failure, underscores the need for greater understanding. This review discusses recent research on the generation, characterization, and biological impacts of spinal implant wear debris. It draws on retrieval analysis, wear simulation, in vivo models, and a survey conducted with the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative to assess current clinical practices and highlight gaps in knowledge. Additionally, this critical review explores future strategies to reduce the biological impact of wear particles and improve the safety and longevity of spinal implants through better therapeutics and design innovations. By combining literature and clinical insights, this paper aims to guide future research in addressing the complexities of spinal implant wear and its biological consequences.

We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

BACKGROUND

Replacement of a diseased lumbar intervertebral disc with an artificial device, a procedure known as lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR), has been practiced since the 1980s.

METHODS

Comprehensive review of published literature germane to LTDR, but comment is restricted to high-quality evidence reporting implantation of lumbar artificial discs that have been commercially available for at least 15 years at the time of writing and which continue to be commercially available.

RESULTS

LTDR is shown to be a noninferior (and sometimes superior) alternative to lumbar fusion in patients with discogenic low back pain and/or radicular pain attributable to lumbar disc degenerative disease (LDDD). Further, LTDR is a motion-preserving procedure, and evidence is emerging that it may also result in risk reduction for subsequent development and/or progression of adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the substantial logistical challenges to the safe introduction of LTDR to a health care facility, the procedure continues to gain acceptance, albeit slowly.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with LDDD who are considering an offer of spinal surgery can only provide valid and informed consent if they have been made aware of all reasonable surgical and nonsurgical options that may benefit them. Accordingly, and in those cases in which LTDR may have a role to play, patients under consideration for other forms of spinal surgery should be informed that this valid procedure exists.

ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this Policy Statement is to educate patients, physicians, medical providers, reviewers, adjustors, case managers, insurers, and all others involved or affected by insurance coverage decisions regarding lumbar disc replacement surgery.

PROCEDURES

This Policy Statement was developed by a panel of physicians selected by the Board of Directors of ISASS for their expertise and experience with lumbar TDR. The panel's recommendation was entirely based on the best evidence-based scientific research available regarding the safety and effectiveness of lumbar TDR.

Severe impingement of lumbar disc replacements increases the functional biological activity of polyethylene wear debris

BACKGROUND

Wear, oxidation, and particularly rim impingement damage of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene total disc replacement components have been observed following surgical revision. However, neither in vitro testing nor retrieval-based evidence has shown the effect(s) of impingement on the characteristics of polyethylene wear debris. Thus, we sought to determine (1) differences in polyethylene particle size, shape, number, or biological activity that correspond to mild or severe rim impingement and (2) in an analysis of all total disc replacements, regardless of impingement classification, whether there are correlations between the extent of regional damage and the characteristics of polyethylene wear debris.

METHODS

The extent of dome and rim damage was characterized for eleven retrieved polyethylene cores obtained at revision surgery after an average duration of implantation of 9.7 years (range, 4.6 to 16.1 years). Polyethylene wear debris was isolated from periprosthetic tissues with use of nitric acid and was imaged with use of environmental scanning electron microscopy. Subsequently, particle size, shape, number, biological activity, and chronic inflammation scores were determined.

RESULTS

Grouping of particles by size ranges that represented high biological relevance (<0.1 to 1-μm particles), intermediate biological relevance (1 to 10-μm particles), and low biological relevance (>10-μm particles) revealed an increased volume fraction of particles in the <0.1 to 1-μm and 1 to 10-μm size ranges in the mild-impingement cohort as compared with the severe-impingement cohort. The increased volume fractions resulted in a higher specific biological activity per unit particle volume in the mild-impingement cohort than in the severe-impingement cohort. However, functional biological activity, which is normalized by particle volume (mm3/g of tissue), was significantly higher in the severe-impingement cohort. This increase was due to a larger volume of particles in all three size ranges. In both cohorts, the functional biological activity correlated with the chronic inflammatory response, and the extent of rim penetration positively correlated with increasing particle size, number, and functional biological activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that severe rim impingement increases the production of biologically relevant particles from motion-preserving lumbar total disc replacement components.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effect of anterior-posterior shear on the wear of CHARITÉ total disc replacement

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro study of the wear rates of the CHARITÉ lumbar total disc replacement (TDR).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of anterior-posterior shear on the in vitro wear rates of the CHARITÉ lumbar TDR.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Current standards prescribe only 4-degrees of freedom (DOF) inputs for evaluating the in vitro wear of TDRs, despite the functional spinal unit incorporating 6 DOF. Anterior-posterior shear has been highlighted as a significant load, particularly in the lumbar spine. A previous study investigated the effect of an anterior-posterior shear on the ProDisc-L, finding that wear rates were not significantly different from 4-DOF wear tests.

METHODS

Six CHARITÉ lumbar discs were mounted in a 5 active DOF spine wear simulator and tested under 4-DOF (ISO18192) conditions. Six further CHARITÉ lumbar discs were tested under 5-DOF conditions, consisting of 4-DOF conditions plus an anterior-posterior shear displacement of +2/-1.5 mm. The displacement was decreased and then increased by a factor of 2 to investigate the effect of the magnitude of displacement. Micro-computed tomographic scans of the discs were taken before and after wear testing, and the height loss of the discs was calculated. These were compared with the same measurements taken from explanted CHARITÉ discs, micro-computed tomography scanned at another institution.

RESULTS

Wear rates for 4 DOF (12.2 ± 1.0 mg/MC) were not significantly different from 4-DOF tests on the ProDisc-L. Wear rates were significantly increased (P < 0.01) for "standard" 5-DOF conditions (22.3 ± 2.0 mg/MC), decreased 5 DOF (24.3 ± 4.9 mg/MC), and increased 5 DOF (29.1 ± 7.6 mg/MC). The height loss of the explants and in vitro tested discs were not significantly different (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The addition of anterior-posterior shear to wear testing inputs of the CHARITÉ lumbar TDR increases the wear rate significantly, which is in direct contrast to the previous 5-DOF testing on the ProDisc. This study highlights the importance of clinically relevant testing regimens, and that test inputs may be different for dissimilar design philosophies.