Sacro-femoral-pubic angle: a coronal parameter to estimate pelvic tilt

The role of pelvic coronal parameters in determining sagittal balance: a prospective radiographic analysis of pelvic spinopelvic alignment in Chinese asymptomatic Han adolescents

Background

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a complex three-dimensional spinal deformity where sagittal alignment significantly influences clinical outcomes. This study aims to analyze spinopelvic balance parameters in asymptomatic adolescents without scoliosis, examining the correlation between pelvic coronal parameters and sagittal balance parameters to validate their use as preliminary indicators in assessing pelvic rotation.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted involving 354 adolescents (199 females, 155 males) aged 6-18 years who underwent full-length anteroposterior (AP) and lateral spine radiographs at The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University between October 2022 and December 2023. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Radiographic assessments included measuring pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic sacral angle (PSA), and other related parameters. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

Results

Significant gender differences were observed in Risser sign distribution and pelvic tilt, with females exhibiting more advanced skeletal maturity. Positive correlations were found between pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt (r = 0.41), and pelvic incidence and sacral slope (r = 0.57), while negative correlations were noted between pelvic incidence and pelvic sacral angle (r = -0.43). Strong correlations between sagittal parameters and newly introduced coronal parameters, such as sacral-femoral-pubic angle and Pubo-Hilgenreiner Distance, were also identified.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that parameters like Iliac tilt, Pelvic sacral angle, Sacral-femoral-pubic angle, and Pubo-Hilgenreiner Distance correlate well with traditional spinopelvic parameters and can be used to assess pelvic sagittal balance in clinical settings. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to further validate these findings.

Does Pelvic Tilt Change After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate preoperative pelvic tilt utilizing the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle on standing pelvic x-rays, and (2) determine if the SFP angle changes after a unilateral or bilateral PAO.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of PAOs performed by a single hip preservation surgeon from November 2018 to November 2023. Standing x-rays were reviewed at 4 time points: preoperative, subacute postoperative, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Data collected included demographics, lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle, and sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle (a surrogate metric for pelvic tilt). Linear mixed models and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate preoperative to postoperative differences in pelvic tilt for the unilateral and bilateral PAO groups, respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria, consisting of 53 unilateral and 21 bilateral PAO patients (18.5±4.1 vs. 21.3±5.1 y, 90.6% vs. 95.2% female, LCEA 17.5 deg±6.5 deg vs. 18.0 deg±5.5 deg and 18.0 deg±6.3 deg, respectively). The Average preoperative pelvic tilt, calculated from the SFP angle, for the unilateral and bilateral PAO patients were 9.1 degrees±5.5 degrees and 8.1 degrees±5.6 degrees, respectively. These values increased postoperatively at average 7-week (-0.3 deg±3.4 deg and 1.3 deg±3.7 deg), 6-month (1.1 deg±3.8 deg and 2.7 deg±3.4 deg), and 12-month (1.0 deg±4.1 deg and 2.7 deg±3.0 deg) follow-up. Significant differences in pelvic tilt were observed from preoperative x-rays to 6 months ( P =0.002) and 12 months ( P =0.001) for the bilateral PAO patients, whereas the unilateral group demonstrated similar pelvic tilt at all time points ( P =0.09).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing bilateral PAO demonstrated an average increase in pelvic tilt of 2.7 degrees as measured by SFP angle at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, suggesting a compensatory adaptation after surgery that may have implications in rehabilitation regimens and planned surgical corrections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic study.

Erect Weight-Bearing Pelvic Radiographs are Superior to Supine Radiographs for Diagnosis of Mixed Type Acetabular Retroversion Plus Developmental Dysplasia Hip Deformity

PURPOSE

this study focused on the mixed-type deformities of acetabular retroversion (AR) and developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) deformity and aimed to ascertain the changes in pelvic tilt from a supine to a standing position in these cases and identify potential underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on cases with symptomatic DDH from January 1, 2019, to April 30, 2023. DDH was defined as lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <20°. AR was diagnosed by using a crossover index threshold of 0.2 in standing pelvic X-ray. Two observers assessed the supine and weight-bearing pelvic radiographs, along with computed tomography (CT) scans. The evaluated parameters included pelvic tilt (sacrofemoral-pubic angle [SFP], symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance [PSSC], pubic symphysis to sacroiliac [PSSI]), AR (crossover index, posterior wall sign), acetabular coverage (LCEA, ischial spine sign [ISS]), and axial rotation of the hemipelvis (pelvic width index, obturator index, and ilio-ischial angle). Acetabular orientation and coverage was measured by CT through anterior sector angle (ASA), posterior sector angle (PSA) and acetabular anteversion (AA). Cases with AR plus DDH were defined as mixed-type deformity. Comparative analyses between mixed-type deformities and DDH cases were performed along with subgroup and correlation analyses within mixed-type cases. Inter-observer and intraobserver reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

A total of 85 were included. Out of that 26 cases (30.59%) had mixed-type deformity, where transition from the supine to standing position led to an increased posterior pelvic tilt (SFP [supine: 64.35 ± 4.6°, standing: 74.75 ± 4.16°, P < .001], PSSC [supine: 6.37 ± 2.47, standing: 2.08 ± 1.32, P < .001] and PSSI [supine: 9.47 ± 1.66, standing: 6.33 ± 1.08, P < .001]). Compared to cases with DDH, CT examination revealed a significantly greater anterior acetabular coverage and less posterior superior coverage, with smaller PSA and greater ASA (P < .05) for cases with AR. The superior iliac wing angle (mixed type: 45.63 ± 9.22°, isolated type: 50.70 ± 8.77°, P = .013), inferior iliac wing angle(mixed type: 60.77 ± 8.24°, isolated type: 65.24 ± 8.02°, P = .013), and ischiopubic angle (IPA) (mixed type: 32.27 ± 3.19°, isolated type: 36.71 ± 5.38°, P < .001) were significantly reduced in AR cases, suggesting external rotation of the hemipelvis. Subgroup analysis showed that cases with a higher crossover index had a significantly higher PSSC and a significantly lower IPA.

CONCLUSIONS

AR was observed in 31% of DDH cases and was associated with a notable posterior pelvic tilt during postural transitions. This tilt appeared to be a compensatory mechanism affecting the AR diagnosis. Key changes in the acetabular coverage, including increased anterior coverage and decreased superior posterior coverage, were also observed. Additionally, external rotation of the hemipelvis in mixed-type cases correlated strongly with the extent of AR and anterior acetabular coverage, suggesting that it may be a key contributor to the underlying mechanism of this mixed-type deformity.

Can we identify abnormal pelvic tilt using pre-THA anteroposterior pelvic radiographs?

BACKGROUND

Patients with increased pelvic tilt (PT) are at risk for instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Identification of increased PT using anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs could avoid additional spinopelvic radiographs. This study aimed to (1) describe which AP pelvic parameters most accurately estimate sagittal PT, and (2) determine thresholds for these parameters that can identify patients with increased PT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive, cohort study in a tertiary referral hospital on 225 patients (age: 66 ± 12 years-old; 52% female) listed for THA. Patients underwent pre-operative standing AP pelvic radiographs to measure distance- and angular- based parameters from several anatomical landmarks. Sagittal PT was measured on a standing lateral spinopelvic radiograph and considered high when ≥ 20°.

RESULTS

No AP pelvic parameters correlated strongly with sagittal PT. Ratio between horizontal and vertical diameter of the pelvic foramen (C/D ratio) (rho - 0.341; p < 0.001); and vertical distance between trans-SIJ and trans-ASIS line (SITA) (rho 0.307; p < 0.001) correlated moderately with sagittal PT. Sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle < 60° had highest sensitivity (85%), but lowest specificity (52%) to differentiate between patients with and without increased PT. If SITA > 62 mm, C/D ratio < 0.5 and SFP < 60°, specificity increased (88%), but sensitivity was low (49%).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of computerized models, AP pelvic parameters cannot accurately predict sagittal PT. However, an SFP < 60° should alert a hip surgeon that a patient may have an increased PT, and would benefit from additional lateral spinopelvic imaging prior to THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Assessment of Pelvic Tilt in Anteroposterior Radiographs by Area Ratio Based on Deep Learning

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostics.

OBJECTIVES

Based on deep learning semantic segmentation model, we sought to assess pelvic tilt by area ratio of the lesser pelvic and the obturator foramen in anteroposterior (AP) radiographs.

BACKGROUND

Pelvic tilt is a critical factor in hip and spinal surgery, commonly evaluated by medical professionals through sagittal pelvic radiographs. The inherent pelvic asymmetry, as well as potential obstructions from clothing and musculature in roentgenography, may result in ghosting and blurring artifacts, thereby complicating precise measurement.

METHODS

PT directly affects the area ratio of the lesser pelvis to the obturator foramen in AP radiographs. An exponential regression analysis of simulated radiographs from ten male and ten female pelvises in specific tilt positions derived a formula correlating this area ratio with PT. Two blinded investigators evaluated this formula using 161 simulated AP pelvic radiographs. A deep learning semantic segmentation model was then fine-tuned to automatically calculate the area ratio, enabling intelligent PT evaluation. This model and the regression function were integrated for automated PT measurement and tested on a dataset of 231 clinical cases.

RESULTS

We observed no disparity between men and women in the aforementioned area ratio. The test results from two blinded investigators analyzing 161 simulated radiographs revealed a mean absolute error of 0.19° (SD ±4.71°), with a correlation coefficient between them reaching 0.96. In addition, the mean absolute error obtained from testing 231 clinical AP radiographs using the fine-tuned semantic segmentation model mentioned earlier is -0.58° (SD ±5.97°).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that using deep learning neural networks enabled a more accurate and robust automatic measurement of PT through the area ratio of the lesser pelvis and obturator foramen.

Evaluating pelvic tilt using the pelvic antero-posterior radiographs: A novel method

Pelvic tilt (PT) is an important parameter for orthopedic surgeries involving hip and spine, typically determined from sagittal pelvic radiographs. However, various challenges can compromise the feasibility of measurement from sagittal imaging, including obscured landmarks, anatomical variations, hardware interference, and limited medical resources. Addressing these challenges and with the aim of reducing radiation exposure to patients, our study developed a novel method to estimate PT from antero-posterior (AP) radiographs, using vertical distances from the pelvic outlet and obturator foramen. We correlated these measurements with PT, defined both anatomically (anterior pelvic plane, PTa) and mechanically (centers of femoral heads and sacral plate, PTm). The study explored creating linear, exponential, and multivariate regression models based on twelve 3D CT-derived pelvic models (six men, six women), simulating AP radiograph projections with controlled PTs. We then validated these models against 105 pairs of patient stereoradiographs. Statistical analysis revealed that combined exponential-linear models yielded the most accurate results, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.75 for PTa and 0.77 for PTm, and mean absolute errors of 3.7° ± 2.6° for PTa and 4.5° ± 3.4° for PTm, showing excellent measurement reliability (all ICCs > 0.9) without significant gender discrepancies. In conclusion, this study presents a validated, simple, and accessible method for estimating PT using AP radiograph parameters, supported by the Supporting Information S1: Excel Tool, showing great potential for clinical application in hip and spine procedures.

Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?

BACKGROUND

There are few data on the impact of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) on sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Prior studies have attempted to delineate the relationship by performing measurements on AP radiographs and using mathematical models to determine changes in postoperative pelvic tilt. This information is clinically significant to a surgeon when evaluating acetabular/pelvic position intraoperatively and understanding spinopelvic alignment changes postoperatively; therefore, radiographic changes from PAO should be described in more detail.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this study, we asked: (1) Does the performance of PAO result in consistent changes in spinopelvic alignment, as measured on EOS radiographs? (2) Does this differ for unilateral versus bilateral PAOs? (3) Does this differ in the setting of a mobile spine versus an immobile spine? (4) Does this differ based on preoperative pelvic tilt?

METHODS

Mean preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative (15 ± 8 months from surgery, minimum 11 months, maximum 65 months) EOS hip-to-ankle standing and sitting radiographs for 55 patients in a prospectively collected registry who underwent PAO with a single surgeon from January 1, 2019, to January 11, 2022, were measured for pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, lateral center-edge angle, L1 pelvic angle, and pubic symphysis to the sacroiliac index. Normality was assessed and paired sample t-tests (normally distributed data) or Wilcoxon signed rank tests (not normally distributed data) were utilized to assess if any measurements changed from preoperative to postoperative. Patients were then divided based on whether they had unilateral or bilateral dysplasia and unilateral or bilateral surgery, and these subgroups were analyzed the same way as the entire cohort. Two more subgroups were then formed based on lumbar mobility, defined as a change in sitting-to-standing lumbar lordosis less or greater than 1 SD from the population mean preoperatively, and the subgroups were analyzed the same way as the entire cohort. Finally, two additional subgroups were formed, preoperative standing pelvic tilt less than 10° and more than 20°, and analyzed the same as the entire cohort.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the median (IQR) standing lateral-center edge angle increased 17°, from a median of 21° (10°) to a median of 38° (8° [95% confidence interval (CI) 16° to 20°; p < 0.001). The median sitting lateral center-edge angle increased 17°, from a median of 18° (8°) to a median of 35° (8° [95% CI 14° to 19°]; p < 0.001). Standing pelvic incidence increased from 50° ± 11° to 52° ± 12° (mean difference 2° [95% CI 1° to 3°]; p = 0.004), but there were no changes for other measured parameters. There were no changes in any of the spinopelvic parameters for patients with unilateral dysplasia receiving a unilateral PAO, but patients with bilateral dysplasia who underwent bilateral PAOs demonstrated an increase in pelvic incidence from 57° (14°) to 60° (16°) (95% CI 1° to 5°; p = 0.02) and a decrease in pubic symphysis to sacroiliac index from 84 mm (24 mm) to 77 mm (23 mm) (95% CI -7° to -2°; p = 0.007). Patients with mobile lumbar spines preoperatively did not exhibit any changes in sagittal spinopelvic alignment, but patients with immobile lumbar spines preoperatively experienced several changes after surgery. Patients with less than 10° of standing pelvic tilt demonstrated a median (IQR) 2° increase in pelvic incidence from median 43° (9°) to 45° (12° [95% CI 0.3° to 4°]; p = 0.03), but they did not experience any other changes in sagittal spinopelvic alignment parameters postoperatively. Patients with preoperative pelvic tilt more than 20° did not experience any change in sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

CONCLUSION

PAO increases pelvic incidence, potentially because of anterior translation of the hip center. There were no changes in other spinopelvic parameters postoperatively except after bilateral PAO. Additionally, patients lacking spine mobility preoperatively, indicated by a minimal change in lumbar lordosis between standing and sitting positions, may experience several changes in spinopelvic alignment, including increased mobility of their spine after PAO. This may be because of decreased compensatory spine splinting after increasing acetabular coverage, but further research including patient-reported outcomes is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?

BACKGROUND

The radiographic appearance of the acetabulum differs between the supine and standing positions in patients with hip conditions. The pelvis undergoes a change in tilt when transitioning between positions, resulting in variations in version and acetabular coverage. However, the extent of these variations in well-functioning volunteers without compensatory patterns caused by pain is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed this study to (1) quantify differences in radiographic acetabular measurements when transitioning between supine and standing among asymptomatic, well-functioning volunteers; (2) assess differences in pelvic tilt between positions; and (3) test whether individual anatomic parameters are associated with the change in tilt.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center study performed at an academic referral center. One hundred volunteers (students, staff, and patients with upper limb injuries) with well-functioning hips (Oxford hip score ≥ 45) were invited to participate. A total of 45% (45) of them were female, their mean age was 37 ± 14 years, and their mean BMI was 25 ± 2 kg/m 2 . Supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs were analyzed to determine numerous acetabular parameters including the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), anterior wall index (AWI), posterior wall index (PWI), crossover sign (COS), crossover ratio (COR), posterior wall sign (PWS), ischial spine sign (ISS), and femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof index (FEAR), as well as pelvic parameters including the sacrofemoral-pubic angle (SFP). Spinopelvic parameters were measured from lateral standing spinopelvic radiographs. Radiographic measurements were performed by one hip preservation research fellow and a fellowship-trained staff surgeon. Differences in parameters were determined, and correlations between postural differences and morphological parameters were tested. Clinically important differences were defined as a difference greater than 3° for acetabular angle measurements and 0.03 for acetabular ratio measurements, based on previous studies.

RESULTS

Lateral coverage angles did not show a clinically important difference between positions. AWI decreased when standing (0.47 ± 0.13 versus 0.41 ± 0.14; p < 0.001), whereas acetabular retroversion signs were more pronounced when supine (COS: 34% [34 of 100], PWS: 68% [68 of 100], and ISS: 34% [34 of 100] versus COS: 19% [19 of 100], PWS: 38% [38 of 100], and ISS: 14% [14 of 100]; all p values < 0.05). Pelvic tilt increased by a mean of 4° ± 4° when standing, but the range of change was from -15° to 7°. The change in AWI (ρ = 0.47; p < 0.001), PWI (ρ = -0.45; p < 0.001), and COR (ρ = 0.52; p < 0.001) between positions correlated with ΔSFP. Volunteers with spinal imbalance (pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis > 10°) demonstrated greater change in pelvic tilt (ΔSFP) (-7° ± 3° versus -4° ± 4°; p = 0.02) and a greater reduction in AWI (by 10%). These volunteers demonstrated reduced standing lumbar lordosis angles (45° ± 11° versus 61° ± 10°; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular version increases from supine to standing because of an increase in pelvic tilt. The change in pelvic tilt between positions exhibited substantial variability. Individuals with reduced lumbar lordosis for a given pelvic incidence value demonstrated greater pelvic mobility. No features on supine radiographs were associated with the change in tilt.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Performing standing radiographs in addition to supine views can help identify aberrant physiologic patterns in patients with diagnostic dilemmas and might thus help with management. Normative data of pelvic tilt change can help clinicians identify patients who demonstrate excessive change in tilt that contributes to abnormal hip pathomechanics.

Change in cup orientation from supine to standing posture: a prospective cohort study of 419 total hip arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Arthroplasty surgeons traditionally assess cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) on supine radiographs. Contemporary hip-spine analyses provide information on standing, functional cup orientation. This study aims to (i) characterize cup orientations when supine and standing; (ii) determine orientation differences between postures; and (iii) identify factors associated with magnitude of orientation differences.

METHODS

This is a 2-center, multi-surgeon, prospective, consecutive cohort study. 419 primary THAs were included (57% women; mean age: 64 years, standard deviation [SD] 11). All patients underwent supine and standing antero-posterior pelvic and lateral spinopelvic radiographs. Cup orientation and spinopelvic parameters were measured. Target cup orientation was defined as inclination/anteversion of 40°/20° ± 10°. A change in orientation (Δinclination/Δanteversion) between postures > 5° was defined as clinically significant. Variability was defined as 2 x SD.

RESULTS

Inclination increased from 40° (supine) to 42° (standing) corresponding to a Δinclination of 2° (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-3). Anteversion increased from 25° (supine) to 30° (standing) corresponding to a Δanteversion of 5° (CI 5-6). When supine, 69% (CI 65-74) of THAs were within target, but only 44% (CI 39-49) were within target when standing, resulting in a further 26% (CI 21-30) being out of target when standing. From supine to standing, a clinically significant change in anteversion (> 5°) was seen in 47% (CI 42-52) of cases. Δanteversion was higher in women than in men (6°, CI 5-7 vs 5°, CI 4-5) corresponding to a difference of 1° (CI 1-2), which was dependent on tilt change, standing cup anteversion, age, and standing pelvic tilt.

CONCLUSION

Cup inclination and version increase upon standing but significant variability exists due to patient factors.

Spinopelvic interactions in total hip arthroplasty: 295 patients followed for a minimum follow-up of 10 years

BACKGROUND

Concurrent spinal pathology is frequent in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study we examined whether spinopelvic interactions affect THA outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

295 patients with a mean age of 63.3 (range 56‒80) years receiving a THA between 2006 and 2009 were assessed. Of these, 195 had mild lumbar disc degeneration and 100 had advanced lumbar spondylosis. We analysed the changes in the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the survival rate for postoperative low back pain (LBP) and dislocation. Changes in acetabular component position, sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) and pelvic obliquity (PO) angles were assessed with radiological images.

RESULTS

The mean HHS was lower in female patients (p = 0.009), patients >65 years of age (p < 0.001) and those with advanced lumbar spondylosis (p = 0.002). 52 (71.2%) of the patients reporting preoperative LBP experienced improvement after THA while 47 (21.1%) of those without preoperative LBP postoperatively reported new onset LBP. Female patients (p = 0.025; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.831; 95% CI, 1.081-3.101) and those with preoperative LBP (p = 0.007; HR 2.068; 95% CI, 1.221-3.504) were at a higher risk of developing postoperative LBP at 10 years. 4 out of 9 THA dislocations were late and had shown decreasing SFP angle values over time. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion angles increased over time, whereas the SFP angle was associated with sex and age and the PO angle with age and the severity of any preoperative lumbar degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent spinal pathology influences THA outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Sex, age, and associated lumbar degeneration can affect clinical and radiological changes over time. A decrease in SFP angle values over time was found in patients sustaining late dislocation.

Influence of acetabular and femoral morphology on pelvic tilt

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether anterior pelvic plane-pelvic tilt (APP-PT) is associated with distinct hip pathomorphologies. We asked: is there a difference in APP-PT between young symptomatic patients being evaluated for joint preservation surgery and an asymptomatic control group? Does APP-PT vary among distinct acetabular and femoral pathomorphologies? And does APP-PT differ in symptomatic hips based on demographic factors?

Methods

This was an institutional review board-approved, single-centre, retrospective, case-control, comparative study, which included 388 symptomatic hips in 357 patients who presented to our tertiary centre for joint preservation between January 2011 and December 2015. Their mean age was 26 years (SD 2; 23 to 29) and 50% were female. They were allocated to 12 different morphological subgroups. The study group was compared with a control group of 20 asymptomatic hips in 20 patients. APP-PT was assessed in all patients based on supine anteroposterior pelvic radiographs using validated HipRecon software. Values in the two groups were compared using an independent-samples t-test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the influences of diagnoses and demographic factors on APP-PT. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for APP-PT was defined as > 1 SD.

Results

There were no significant differences in APP-PT between the control group and the overall group (1.1° (SD 3.0°; -4.9° to 5.9°) vs 1.8° (SD 3.4°; -6.9° to 13.2°); p = 0.323). Acetabular retroversion and overcoverage groups showed higher mean APP-PTs compared with the control group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.014) and were the only diagnoses with a significant influence on APP-PT in the stepwise multiple regression analysis. All differences were below the MCID. The age, sex, height, weight, and BMI showed no influence on APP-PT.

Conclusion

APP-PT showed no radiologically significant variation across different pathomorphologies of the hip in patients being assessed for joint-preserving surgery.

Unveiling the learning curve of periacetabular osteotomy

Aims

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is widely recognized as a demanding surgical procedure for acetabular reorientation. Reports about the learning curve have primarily focused on complication rates during the initial learning phase. Therefore, our aim was to assess the PAO learning curve from an analytical perspective by determining the number of PAOs required for the duration of surgery to plateau and the accuracy to improve.

Methods

The study included 118 consecutive PAOs in 106 patients. Of these, 28 were male (23.7%) and 90 were female (76.3%). The primary endpoint was surgical time. Secondary outcome measures included radiological parameters. Cumulative summation analysis was used to determine changes in surgical duration. A multivariate linear regression model was used to identify independent factors influencing surgical time.

Results

The learning curve in this series was 26 PAOs in a period of six months. After 26 PAO procedures, a significant drop in surgical time was observed and a plateau was also achieved. The mean duration of surgery during the learning curve was 103.8 minutes (SD 33.2), and 69.7 minutes (SD 18.6) thereafter (p < 0.001). Radiological correction of acetabular retroversion showed a significant improvement after having performed a total of 93 PAOs, including anteverting PAOs on 35 hips with a retroverted acetabular morphology (p = 0.005). Several factors were identified as independent variables influencing duration of surgery, including patient weight (β = 0.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 0.7); p < 0.001), learning curve procedure phase of 26 procedures (β = 34.0 (95% CI 24.3 to 43.8); p < 0.001), and the degree of lateral correction expressed as the change in the lateral centre-edge angle (β = 0.7 (95% CI 0.001 to 1.3); p = 0.048).

Conclusion

The learning curve for PAO surgery requires extensive surgical training at a high-volume centre, with a minimum of 50 PAOs per surgeon per year. This study defined a cut-off value of 26 PAO procedures, after which a significant drop in surgical duration occurred. Furthermore, it was observed that a retroverted morphology of the acetabulum required a greater number of procedures to acquire proficiency in consistently eliminating the crossover sign. These findings are relevant for fellows and fellowship programme directors in establishing the extent of training required to impart competence in PAO.

Evaluating Pelvic Tilt Using the Pelvic Antero-Posterior Projection Images: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pelvic tilt (PT) is a routinely evaluated parameter in hip and spine surgeries, and is usually measured on a sagittal pelvic radiograph. This may not always be feasible due to limitations such as landmark visibility, pelvic anomaly, and hardware presence. Tremendous efforts have been dedicated to using pelvic antero-posterior (AP) radiographs for assessing sagittal PT. Thus, this systematic review aimed to collect these methods and evaluate their performances.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases in June 2023 with backward reference trailing (Google Scholar archive). There were 30 studies recruited. Risk of bias was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. The relevant data were tabulated in a standardized form for evaluating either the absolute PT or relative PT. Disagreement was resolved by discussing with the senior author.

RESULTS

There were 19 parameters from pelvic AP projection images involved, with 4 studies which used artificial intelligence, eyeball, or statistical shape method not involving a specific parameter. In comparing the PT values from pelvic sagittal images with those extrapolated from antero-posterior projection images, the highest correlation coefficient was found to be 0.91. The mean absolute difference (error) was 2.6°, with a maximum error reaching 10.9°. Most studies supported the feasibility of using AP parameters to calculate changes in PT.

CONCLUSIONS

No individual AP parameter was found to precisely estimate absolute PT. However, relative PT can be derived by evaluating serial AP radiographs of a patient in varying postures, employing any AP parameters.

Concurrent Learning Approach for Estimation of Pelvic Tilt from Anterior-Posterior Radiograph

Accurate and reliable estimation of the pelvic tilt is one of the essential pre-planning factors for total hip arthroplasty to prevent common post-operative complications such as implant impingement and dislocation. Inspired by the latest advances in deep learning-based systems, our focus in this paper has been to present an innovative and accurate method for estimating the functional pelvic tilt (PT) from a standing anterior-posterior (AP) radiography image. We introduce an encoder-decoder-style network based on a concurrent learning approach called VGG-UNET (VGG embedded in U-NET), where a deep fully convolutional network known as VGG is embedded at the encoder part of an image segmentation network, i.e., U-NET. In the bottleneck of the VGG-UNET, in addition to the decoder path, we use another path utilizing light-weight convolutional and fully connected layers to combine all extracted feature maps from the final convolution layer of VGG and thus regress PT. In the test phase, we exclude the decoder path and consider only a single target task i.e., PT estimation. The absolute errors obtained using VGG-UNET, VGG, and Mask R-CNN are 3.04 ± 2.49, 3.92 ± 2.92, and 4.97 ± 3.87, respectively. It is observed that the VGG-UNET leads to a more accurate prediction with a lower standard deviation (STD). Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed multi-task network leads to a significantly improved performance compared to the best-reported results based on cascaded networks.

The Association of Sacro-Femoro-Pubic Angle and Postoperative Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Spino-pelvic orientation may affect dislocation risk following total hip arthroplasty (THA). It can be measured on lateral lumbo-pelvic radiographs. The sacro-femoro-pubic (SFP) angle, measured on an antero-posterior (AP) pelvis radiograph, is a reliable proxy for pelvic tilt, a measurement of spino-pelvic orientation measured on a lateral lumbo-pelvic radiograph. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between SFP angle and dislocation following THA.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective case-control study was conducted at a single academic center. We matched 71 dislocators (cases) to 71 nondislocators (controls) following THA performed by 1 of 10 surgeons between September 2001 and December 2010. Two authors (readers) independently calculated SFP angle from single preoperative AP pelvis radiographs. Readers were blinded to cases and controls. Conditional logistic regressions were used to identify factors differentiating cases and controls.

RESULTS

The data did not show a clinically relevant or statistically significant difference in SFP angles after adjusting for gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, prosthetic head size, age at time of THA, measurement laterality, and surgeon.

CONCLUSION

We did not find an association between preoperative SFP angle and dislocation following THA in our cohort. Based on our data, SFP angle as measured on a single AP pelvis radiograph should not be used to assess dislocation risk prior to THA.

The Sacro-femoral-pubic Angle Is Unreliable to Estimate Pelvic Tilt: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The accurate measurement of pelvic tilt is critical in hip and spine surgery. A sagittal pelvic radiograph is most often used to measure pelvic tilt, but this radiograph is not always routinely obtained and does not always allow the measurement of pelvic tilt because of problems with image quality or patient characteristics (such as high BMI or the presence of a spinal deformity). Although a number of recent studies have explored the correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle using AP radiographs (SFP method), which aimed to estimate pelvic tilt without a sagittal radiograph, disagreement remains about whether the SFP method is sufficiently valid and reproducible for clinical use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the correlation between SFP and pelvic tilt in the following groups: (1) overall cohort, (2) male and female cohort, and (3) skeletally mature and immature cohorts (young and adult groups, defined as patients older or younger than 20 years). Additionally, we assessed (4) the errors of SFP-estimated pelvic tilt angles and determined (5) measurement reproducibility using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (record ID: CRD42022315673). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were screened in July 2022. The following keywords were used: sacral femoral pubic, sacro femoral pubic, or SFP. The exclusion criteria were nonresearch articles such as commentaries or letters and studies that only investigated relative pelvic tilt rather than absolute pelvic tilt. Although the included studies had different patient recruitment strategies, study quality-wise, they all used an adequate amount of radiographs for landmark annotation and applied a correlation analysis for the relationship between the SFP angle and pelvic tilt. Thus, no risk of bias was found. Participant differences were mitigated via subgroup and sensitivity analyses to remove outliers. Publication bias was assessed using the p value of a two-tailed Egger regression test for the asymmetry of funnel plots, as well as the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method for potential missing publications to impute true correlations. The extracted correlation coefficients r were pooled using the Fisher Z transformation with a significance level of 0.05. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 1247 patients. Four studies were used in the sex-controlled subgroup analysis (312 male and 460 female patients), and all nine studies were included in the age-controlled subgroup analysis (627 adults and 620 young patients). Moreover, a sex-controlled subgroup analysis was conducted in two studies with only young cohorts (190 young male patients and 220 young female patients).

RESULTS

The overall pooled correlation coefficient between SFP and pelvic tilt was 0.61, with high interstudy heterogeneity (I 2 = 76%); a correlation coefficient of 0.61 is too low for most clinical applications. The subgroup analysis showed that the female group had a higher correlation coefficient than the male group did (0.72 versus 0.65; p = 0.03), and the adult group had a higher correlation coefficient than the young group (0.70 versus 0.56; p < 0.01). Three studies reported erroneous information about the measured pelvic tilt and calculated pelvic tilt from the SFP angle. The mean absolute error was 4.6° ± 4.5°; in one study, 78% of patients (39 of 50) were within 5° of error, and in another study, the median absolute error was 5.8º, with the highest error at 28.8° (50 female Asian patients). The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.87 and 0.97 for the SFP angle and between 0.89 and 0.92 for the pelvic tilt angle, and the interrater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.84 and 1.00 for the SFP angle and 0.76 and 0.98 for the pelvic tilt angle. However, large confidence intervals were identified, suggesting considerable uncertainty in measurement at the individual radiograph level.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of the best-available evidence on this topic found the SFP method to be unreliable to extrapolate sagittal pelvic tilt in any patient group, and it was especially unreliable in the young male group (defined as patients younger than age 20 years). Correlation coefficients generally were too low for clinical use, but we remind readers that even a high correlation coefficient does not alone justify clinical application of a metric such as this, unless further subgroup analyses find low error and low heterogeneity, which was not the case here. Further ethnicity-segregated subgroup analyses with age, sex, and diagnosis controls could be useful in the future to determine whether there are some subgroups in which the SFP method is useful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement with Concurrent Disorders of Spinopelvic Anatomy: A Narrative Review

Despite the high success rate of primary total hip replacement (THR), a significant early revision rate remains, which is largely attributed to instability and dislocations. Despite the implants being placed according to the safe zone philosophy of Lewinnek, occurrence of THR dislocation is not an uncommon complication. Large diagnostic and computational model studies have shown variability in patients' mobility based on the individual anatomic and functional relationship of the hip-pelvis-spine complex. The absolute and relative position of hip replacement components changes throughout motion of the patient's body. In the case of spinopelvic pathology such as spine stiffness, the system reaches abnormal positional states, as shown with computerized models. The clinical result of such pathologic hip positioning is edge loading, implant impingement, or even joint dislocation. To prevent such complications, surgeons must change the dogma of single correct implant positioning and take into account patients' individualized anatomy and function. It is essential to broaden the standard diagnostics and their anatomical interpretation, and correct the pre-operative surgical planning. The need for correct and personalized implant placement pushes forward the development and adaptation of novel technologies in THR, such as robotics. In this current concepts narrative review, we simplify the spinopelvic biomechanics and pathoanatomy, the relevant anatomical terminology, and the diagnosis and management algorithms most commonly used today.

Pelvic tilt after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy-a long-term follow-up study

Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are believed to present with increased anterior pelvic tilt to compensate for reduced anterior femoral head coverage. If true, pelvic tilt in dysplastic patients should be high preoperatively and decrease after correction with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). To date, the evolution of pelvic tilt in long-term follow-up after PAO has not been reported. We therefore asked the following questions: (i) is there a difference in pelvic tilt between patients with DDH and an asymptomatic control group? (ii) How does pelvic tilt evolve during long-term follow-up after Bernese PAO compared with before surgery? This study is a therapeutic study with the level of evidence III. We retrospectively compared preoperative pelvic tilt in 64 dysplastic patients (71 hips) with an asymptomatic control group of 20 patients (20 hips). In addition, immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up (at 18 ± 8 [range 7-34 years) pelvic tilt was assessed and compared. Dysplastic patients had a significantly higher mean preoperative pelvic tilt than controls [2.3 ± 5.3° (-11.2° to 16.4°) versus 1.1 ± 3.0° (-4.9 to 5.9), P = 0.006]. Mean pelvic tilt postoperatively was 1.5 ± 5.3° (-11.2 to 17.0º, P = 0.221) and at long-term follow-up was 0.4 ± 5.7° (range -9.9° to 20.9°, P = 0.002). Dysplastic hips undergoing PAO show a statistically significant decrease in pelvic tilt during long-term follow-up. However, given the large interindividual variability in pelvic tilt, the observed differences may not achieve clinical significance.

Does pelvic tilt change with a peri-acetabular osteotomy?

Change in pelvic tilt (PT) during and after peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) is important for surgical planning. The aims of this study were to (i) determine how PT varies throughout the course of treatment in patients undergoing PAO, (ii) test what factors influence the change in PT and (iii) assess whether changes in PT influenced achieved correction. This is an retrospective, single-centre, consecutive case series of 111 patients treated with PAO for global (n = 79), posterior (n = 49) or anterior dysplasia (n = 6) (mean age: 27.3 ± 7.7 years; 85% females). PT was determined on supine, anteroposterior pelvic radiographs pre-, intra-, 1 day, 6 weeks and 1 year post-operatively, using the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, a validated, surrogate marker of PT. An optimal acetabular correction was based on the lateral centre-edge angle (25°-40°), acetabular index (-5° to 10°) and cross-over ratio (<20%). There was a significant difference across pre- (70.1° ± 4.8°), 1-day (71.7° ± 4.3°; P < 0.001) and early post-operative SFP (70.6° ± 4.7°; P = 0.004). The difference in SPF between pre-operative and 1-year post-operative was -0.5° ± 3.1° (P = 0.043), with 9% of cases having a difference of >5°. The difference in SFP did not correlate with age, sex, body mass index, type of dysplasia or achievement of optimal acetabular correction (P = 0.1-0.9). In the early post-operative period, PT is reduced, leading to a relative appearance of acetabular retroversion, which gradually corrects and is restored by annual follow-up. The degree of change in PT during PAO did not adversely affect fragment orientation. PT does not significantly change in most patients undergoing PAO and therefore does not appear to be a compensatory mechanism.

Correlations Analysis of Different Pelvic Tilt Definitions: A Preliminary Study

Background: Pelvic tilt (PT) is described as the pelvic orientation along the transverse axis, yet 4 PT definitions were established based on radiographic landmarks: anterior pelvic plane (PTa), the center of femoral heads to sacral plate (PTm), pelvic outlet (PTh), and sacral slope (SS). These landmarks quantify a similar concept, yet understanding of their relationships is lacking, and their differences are sometimes ignored. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the correlations and differences of PT definitions for education and research purposes. Methods: This study reviewed 105 sagittal pelvic radiographs of patients (68 men and 37 women) awaiting hip surgery at a single clinic. Hip hardware and spine pathologies were examined for subgroup analysis. Two observers annotated 4 PTs in a gender-dependent manner and repeated it after 6 months. The linear regression model and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied with a 95% confidence interval. Results: The SS showed no correlation to the other 3 PT definitions, except for females in the hip hardware subgroup (n = 17). PTm demonstrated very strong linear correlation to PTh (r > 0.9) under the linear model PTm = 0.951 × PTh - 68.284. Conclusion: The PTm and PTh can be calculated from each other under a simple linear regression equation, which enables comparisons between them. SS presented poor correlations to the other PT parameters, except for the female subgroup with hip implant that required further analysis; PTa-related comparisons showed high anatomical variations between patients.

Do polyethylene wear particles affect the development of pseudotumor in total hip arthroplasty? A minimum 15-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Adverse local tissue reactions have been problematic as an implant-related complication in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite the absence of significant metal wear and corrosion, granulomatous pseudotumor has been reported to be caused by polyethylene wear. We performed a long-term follow-up study investigating the relationship between polyethylene wear and pseudotumor formation in THA.

METHODS

This study included 57 patients (64 hips) that underwent primary THA with metal-on-polyethylene or ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing over a minimum follow-up of 15 years. They were stratified into pseudotumor and non-pseudotumor groups and their linear wear rates of polyethylene liner and serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion levels were compared. Pseudotumor was diagnosed on metal artifact reduction sequence-MRI according to its composition and wall thickness using the Hauptfleisch classification.

RESULTS

The incidence of pseudotumor was 34% (22/64 hips) at the mean follow-up of 16.9 years. Metal ion levels did not differ between the pseudotumor and non-pseudotumor groups, and none of the patients exceeded the Co/Cr ratio of 2.0 μg/L. Moreover, the wear rate in the pseudotumor group was 1.8 times greater than in the non-pseudotumor group (0.14 vs. 0.08 mm/year, P < 0.001). According to an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves, the cutoff level of the wear rate to discriminate between pseudotumor and non-pseudotumor patients at 15 years was 0.11 mm/year (area under the curve = 91%; sensitivity = 95%; specificity = 78%; accuracy = 87%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results might provide new insights into excessive polyethylene wear potentially leading to the future development of both pseudotumor and osteolysis. Further studies are needed to clarify the direct relationship between polyethylene wear and pseudotumor and the mutual effects of osteolysis and pseudotumor in particle reactions.

Measurement of pelvic tilt and rotation on AP radiographs using HipRecon: Validation and comparison to other parameters

In this paper, we present and evaluate HipRecon, a noncommercial software package that simultaneously calculates pelvic tilt and rotation from an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph. We asked: What is the (1) accuracy and precision, (2) robustness, and (3) intra-/interobserver reliability/reproducibility of HipRecon to analyze both pelvic tilt and rotation on conventional AP pelvis radiographs? (4) How does the prediction of pelvic tilt on AP pelvis radiographs using HipRecon compare to established measurement methods? We compared the actual pelvic tilt of 20 adult human cadaveric pelvises with the calculated pelvic orientation based on an AP pelvis radiograph using HipRecon software. The pelvises were mounted on a radiolucent fixture and a total of 380 AP pelvis radiographs with different configurations were acquired. In addition, we investigated the correlation between actual tilt and the tilt calculated using HipRecon and seven other established measurement methods. The calculated software accuracy was 0.2 ± 2.0° (-3.6-4.1) for pelvic tilt and 0.0 ± 1.2° (-2.2-2.3, p = 0.39) for pelvic rotation. The Bland-Altman analysis showed values that were evenly and randomly spread in both directions. HipRecon showed excellent consistency for the measurement of pelvic tilt and rotation (intraobserver intraclass-correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.99-0.99] and interobserver ICC 0.99 [95% CI: 0.99-0.99]). Of all eight analyzed methods, the highest correlation coefficient was found for HipRecon (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). In the future, HipRecon could be used to detect changes in patient-specific pelvic orientation, helping to improve clinical understanding and decision-making in pathologies of the hip.

Reliability and Validity Analysis of Pelvic Sagittal Inclination Calculated by Inverse Cosine Function Method on Pelvic Anteroposterior Radiographs

Objective

Evaluation of sagittal pelvic tilt is significant for hip surgeons. However, the accurate measurement of pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) is still a challenge. The objective of this study is to propose a new method for measurement of PSI from pelvic anteroposterior radiograph based on the inverse cosine function obtained from individualized pelvic model.

Methods

Collecting the imaging data of 30 patients with both pelvic CT and full‐length spine radiographs. Establishing pelvic model by customized 3D reconstruction software. The length of three groups of longitudinal and transverse line segments (A′p and B′) were measured from full‐length spine anteroposterior radiographs. The corresponding anatomical parameters, including A, B, b, ∠α, ∠γ, were measured and calculated on the same patient's pelvic model. The estimated PSI (ePSI) based on three groups of anatomical landmarks, including ePSI‐1, ePSI‐2, and ePSI‐3, were calculated by equation, ePSI=arccosA′pb*B′−∠α, and compared with the actual PSI (aPSI) measured by Surgamap software. For the reliability and validation evaluation, three observers measured these parameters in two rounds. Intra‐class correlation and inter‐class correlation were both calculated. Bland–Altman method was used to evaluate the consistency between the estimated PSI (ePSI) and the actual PSI (aPSI).

Results

ePSI‐1 and ePSI‐2 showed excellent intra‐observer reliability (0.921–0.997, p < 0.001) and inter‐observer reliability (0.801–0.977, p < 0.001). ePSI‐3 had a fair inter‐observer reliability (0.239–0.823, p < 0.001). ePSI‐1 showed the strongest correlation with aPSI (r = 0.917, p < 0.001). Mean (maximum) absolute difference of ePSI‐1, ePSI‐2, and ePSI‐3 is 2.62° (7.42°), 4.23° (13.78°), and 7.74° (31.47°), respectively. The proportion of cases with absolute difference less than 5° in three groups were 86.7% (ePSI‐1), 66.7% (ePSI‐2), 56.7% (ePSI‐3).

Conclusion

This new method based on inverse cosine function has good reliability and validity when used in the evaluation of PSI on pelvic anteroposterior radiographs.

Pelvic tilt from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion of the hip

AIMS

Acetabular retroversion is a recognized cause of hip impingement and can be influenced by pelvic tilt (PT), which changes in different functional positions. Positional changes in PT have not previously been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion.

METHODS

Supine and standing anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs were retrospectively analyzed in 69 patients treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in the angle of PT was measured both by the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle and the pubic symphysis to sacroiliac (PS-SI) index.

RESULTS

In the supine position, the mean PT (by SFP) was 1.05° (SD 3.77°), which changed on standing to a PT of 8.64° (SD 5.34°). A significant increase in posterior PT from supine to standing of 7.59° (SD 4.5°; SFP angle) and 5.89° (SD 3.33°; PS-SI index) was calculated (p < 0.001). There was a good correlation in PT change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (0.901 in the preoperative group and 0.815 in the postoperative group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing radiographs compared to supine: crossover index (0.16 (SD 0.16) vs 0.38 (SD 0.15); p < 0.001), crossover sign (19/28 hips vs 28/28 hips; p < 0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p < 0.001), and posterior wall sign (12/28 hips vs 24/28 hips; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Posterior PT increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion. The features of acetabular retroversion were less evident on standing radiographs. The low PT angle in the supine position is a factor in the increased appearance of acetabular retroversion. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs to highlight signs of acetabular retroversion, and to assist with optimizing acetabular correction at the time of surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):786-791.

The accuracy in determining pelvic tilt from anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in patients awaiting hip arthroplasty

Spinopelvic mobility affects outcome after THA. Whether the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, measured on AP radiographs, can be reliably used to estimate pelvic tilt (PT) in hip osteoarthritis patients is unknown. This study aimed to (1) validate the use of the SFP angle in the calculation of PT from AP radiographs, and (2) identify individual patient factors affecting the estimation of PT. A cohort of 100 patients awaiting THA for end-stage hip osteoarthritis was prospectively studied. AP and lateral radiographs, taken in the standing and relaxed-seated positions were evaluated for spinopelvic measurements (SFP, PT, and pelvic incidence [PI]). To validate the SFP angle, estimated PT values using the formula [PT = 75°-SFP] were compared to the true, measured values from the lateral radiographs. Despite good agreement for the estimated and true PT (16.2 ± 5.9° vs. 15.5 ± 8.6°; p = .315), a significantly poorer agreement could be found between the two methods at high or low values of PT. Patient-specific PI correlated with the difference between the two measurement methods (Pearson's r = -0.644; p < .001). However, the change in SFP angle equaled approximately the change in pelvic tilt (∆PT = 2°-∆SFP; Pearson's r = -0.934; p < .001). Absolute values for the sagittal PT should not be estimated from AP pelvic radiographs in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty. However, the relative change in PT between different positions equals approximately the change in SFP angle. This may allow functional cup orientation after THA to be determined between different postures from an AP radiograph of the pelvis. The SFP angle has moderate accuracy in determining a patient's pelvic tilt; however, it can accurately determine a patient's change in pelvic tilt in different positions.

Reliability and Reproducibility of Sacro-Femoro-Pubic Angle Measurements on Anteroposterior Pelvis Radiographs

Background

The sacro-femoro-pubic (SFP) angle is a surrogate measurement for pelvic tilt obtained on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. It is unknown whether the SFP angle can be measured reliably by senior surgeons and trainees alike.

Methods

We conducted an intrareader and interreader reliability study using preoperative AP pelvis radiographs. Using our hospital electronic database, we randomly selected 31 subjects undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. An attending orthopedic surgeon and two orthopedic surgery residents performed two separate SFP angle measurements for each subject. Intrareader and interreader agreement were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results

Pairwise intrareader and interreader ICCs ranged from 0.91 to 0.99. Overall ICC was 0.94. Interreader ICCs between the attending surgeon and each orthopedic resident were 0.93 and 0.98, and the ICC between orthopedic residents was 0.91. Interreader mean differences for SFP angle measurements were 2.32 degrees or less: -2.03 (standard deviation: 2.23) and 0.29 (1.64) between the attending surgeon and each orthopedic resident, and 2.32 (2.44) between orthopedic residents.

Conclusion

SFP angle may be measured reliably on AP pelvis radiographs by senior clinicians and trainees. SFP angle measurement may prove helpful as an alternative to pelvic tilt measurements when lateral pelvic radiographs are not available.

Rear drop: a new radiographic landmark for estimation of pelvic tilt on pelvis AP radiographs

Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph is often done by indirect methods based on the midline pelvic landmarks. The purpose of this cadaveric study is to describe a new radiographic landmark and reference measurements to estimate the coronal tilt of the pelvis, independent of the midline references. The new radiologic reference is called 'rear drop', and its anatomic location is described with the cadaveric pelvis AP radiographs in various pelvic inclination. The parameters derived from the new reference were used to assess the pelvic tilt, and the results were compared with the previously established method using 'sacrococcygeal joint to symphysis distance' (SCSD). The shape of the new figure is used to determine the position of the pelvis, and its relationship with the previously described acetabular retroversion indicators was statistically analyzed. The new reference figure corresponds to the posteroinferior edge of the horseshoe shape of the acetabular margin. The newly derived reference parameters, rear to tear distance and rear to tear angle, changes with pelvic tilt and are strongly correlated with SCSD. The shape of the rear drop changes with the changing pelvic tilt and correlates statistically with the previously described acetabular retroversion indicators. Rear drop and its derivative measurements can be used as a reliable and reproducible indicator to estimate the coronal pelvic tilt, free of midline reference points. This new reference will be a base for future clinical studies on pelvic tilt, rotation and their application in intraoperative hip fluoroscopy.

Posterior pelvic tilt evolution in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A minimum 5-years follow-up clinico-radiological study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pelvic tilt influences the relative position between total hip arthroplasty (THA) components. Changes in lumbar spine over time may affect clinical and radiological outcomes of THA during follow-up. We assessed the evolution of pelvic tilt and cup position after THA for a minimum follow-up of five years and the possible appearance of complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes 48 patients operated between 2008 and 2012. Clinical data, complication and radiological analysis included sacro-femoral-pubic and acetabular abduction angles on the anteroposterior pelvic view; and cup anteversion angle on the lateral cross-table hip view according to Woo and Morrey. All assessments were done pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, one, two and five years post-operatively.

RESULTS

Mean sacro-femoral-pubic decreased from 60.6∘ preoperatively to 58.8∘ at five years (p > .05), more in females (from 63.3 to 59.3) than males (58.7 to 58.3). Acetabular abduction increased from 47.3 at six-week postoperatively to 48.2 at five years (p > .05) and acetabular anteversion varied from 24.3∘ to 36.1∘ (p < .04). There were four dislocations: one late recurrent dislocation which required cup revision.

CONCLUSION

Despite the sacro-femoral-pubic angle tendency to decrease and anteversion tendency to increase after five years, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the potential increasing in long term complications.

Multivariate analysis of the relationship between gluteal muscle contracture and coxa valga

Background

Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) is a disease characterized by the limited function of the hip joint, knee pain, and abnormal gait. There is a lack of research on the effect of GMC on the hip joint structure to date. This study aims to analyze the association between GMC and the deformity of the hip and pelvis.

Methods

Standing anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 214 patients (152 with gluteal muscle contracture and 62 without gluteal muscle contracture) were retrospectively collected. Neck–shaft angle, lateral center edge angle, Tönnis angle, femoral head coverage index, acetabular depth, Sacro-femoral-pubic angle, and obturator foramen ratio were respectively measured and included in the following statistical analysis. The collected data were analyzed using logistical regression and multiple linear regression to explore the factors influencing coxa valga and SFP angle.

Results

GMC was identified as a common factor significantly associated with coxa valga and increased SFP angle. There is a difference of risk factors in logistic regression for coxa valga between the left and right sides.

Conclusion

GMC is a significant risk factor for coxa valga and increased SFP angle. Given that GMC can cause coxa valga and likely alter the pelvis’s position, GMC should be paid attention to and treated early.

Bestimmung einer Beckenasymmetrie – Sinn oder Unsinn

Pathologien des tiefen Rückens, der Becken- sowie Knie- und Hüftgelenke werden immer wieder mit einer Messung der Beinlänge und Feststellung einer Beckenasymmetrie in Verbindung gebracht. Aufgrund dieser Messungen werden therapeutische Wege eingeschlagen. Zu diesem Thema wurden auf der Basis einer systematischen Literatursuche in zwei maßgeblichen Datenbanken 28 Artikel ermittelt. Die inhaltliche Analyse beschäftigt sich v. a. mit der Variationsanatomie des Beckens sowie der Reliabilität palpatorischer und apparativer Bestimmungen von knöchernen Referenzpunkten am Becken. Hieraus ergeben sich maßgebliche Erkenntnisse: Eine Variationsanatomie des Beckens ist häufig und kommt auch bei nichtsymptomatischen Personen vor. Die palpatorische und apparative Bestimmungen der knöchernen Referenzpunkte sind gering bis moderat reliabel. Der Rückschluss von einer festgestellten Beckenasymmetrie auf den Einfluss bestehender oder noch zu erwartender Rücken‑, Hüft- oder Beckengelenkbeschwerden ist nach derzeitiger Studienlage zumindest umstritten und daher nicht empfehlenswert.

What is the pelvic tilt in acetabular dysplasia and does it change following peri-acetabular osteotomy?

To quantify the pelvic tilt (PT) in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and determine if it represents a compensatory mechanism to improve femoral head coverage, we studied a cohort of 16 patients undergoing 32 bilateral staged PAOs for acetabular dysplasia and compared this to a matched cohort of 32 patients undergoing PAO for unilateral acetabular dysplasia all with >1 year follow-up. The change in PT was determined with two validated methods, namely, the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle and the pubic symphysis to sacroiliac index (PS-SI). Despite an improvement in the lateral centre-edge and Tönnis angles to within normal limits following PAO, patients with unilateral and bilateral acetabular dysplasia have similar PT pre-operatively (8° ± 5°) and post-operatively (9° ± 5°). A change of >5° was observed in only six patients (13%) using the SFP angle, and five patients (10%) using the PS-SI, all increased (posterior rotation of the pelvis). No patients were observed to have a change in PT >10°. The observed PT in our study group is equivalent to that found in the normal population and in patient with symptomatic acetabular retroversion. These findings all suggest that PT is morphological rather than a result of a compensatory mechanism, and even if it was compensatory, it does not appear to reverse significantly following PAO. The target for acetabular reorientation, therefore, remains constant.

Pelvic motion the key to understanding spine-hip interaction

Pelvic motion acting as a hinge between the spine and hips is essential to maintain proper balance during bipedalism. Pelvic rotation is recruited as a compensation mechanism when spinal malalignment occurs.This pelvic rotation can affect functional acetabular orientation, and consequently functional cup positioning if a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is needed. Pelvic retroversion, frequently associated with degenerative spinal changes, implies an increase of acetabular version.Patients with flexible lumbar spines (spine users) protect the hip joint. Patients with stiff, degenerated or fused lumbar spines (hip users) demand higher hip mobility, placing the THA at risk.Pelvises in retroversion place the THA at risk for anterior dislocation when standing. In contrast, pelvises in anteversion or with low pelvic incidence (PI) can place THA at risk for posterior dislocation when sitting.Try to set the cup in an anatomic position. However, bear in mind that low PI pelvises may need more acetabular ante-inclination, and high PI pelvises more acetabular retroversion.If surgery is needed, start first by addressing the hip, except in patients with compensation (high pelvic retroversion), who may need spine surgery first to place the pelvis, and consequently the acetabulum, in a proper position. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:522-533. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200032.

Does Functional Cup Orientation Change at Minimum of 10 Years After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Cup orientation has been shown to influence the postoperative risk of impingement and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and may change over time due to changes in pelvic tilt that occur with aging. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant change in acetabular cup inclination and anteversion over a 10-year period following THA.

METHODS

A retrospective, multisurgeon, single-center cohort study was conducted of 46 patients that underwent THA between 1995 and 2002. A total of 46 patients were included, with a median age at surgery of 56 years, and a median time between initial postoperative radiograph and the most recent one being 13.5 years (minimum 10 years). Cup orientation was measured from postoperative and follow-up supine anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs. Using a validated software, inclination and anteversion were calculated at each interval and the change in cup anteversion and inclination angle was determined. Furthermore, the difference in the sacro-femoral-pubic angle was measured, reflecting the difference in pelvic tilt between intervals.

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected between measurements taken from initial postoperative radiograph and measurements a minimum of 10 years later (P > .45), with the median (interquartile range) change in anteversion, inclination, and sacro-femoral-pubic being 0° (-1° to 3°), 1° (-3° to 2°), and 0° (-2° to 3°), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study found no significant change in functional cup orientation a minimum of 10 years after THA. No shifts in functional cup orientation as a result of altering spinopelvic alignment seemed to be present over a 10-year period.

Can measurements from an anteroposterior radiograph predict pelvic sagittal inclination?

Pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) is often evaluated in patients with hip pathology using lateral radiographs. However, it would be useful if PSI could be predicted from an anteroposterior radiograph since this film is ubiquitous in the evaluation of hip pathology. Herein, computer-modeling was applied to predict PSI from radiographic measurements assessed in the anteroposterior plane. Three-dimensional surface models of the pelvis, femur, and sacrum were reconstructed from computed tomography images of 50 women with hip dysplasia. This study cohort was selected as changes in PSI alter femoral head coverage, which is relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of hip dysplasia, a known cause of hip osteoarthritis. Five radiographic parameters commonly used to independently estimate PSI were evaluated after bone surfaces were projected to an anteroposterior plane, including the symphysis to sacrococcygeal joint distance (S-S distance), the pelvic foramen aspect ratio (PF ratio), the distance between the symphysis and a line connecting the femoral head centers (S-H distance), the sacro-femoral-pubic angle (SFP angle), and the pelvic vertical ratio (PVR). Regression models determined the ability of these parameters to predict PSI from -20° to 20° at 1° increment. All five parameters showed a strong correlation with the PSI (all r > 0.9). From the regression models, PSI was estimated with a median (maximum) absolute error of 3.6° (18.4°), 3.8° (17.7°), 5.2° (17.9°), 5.8° (28.8°), and 3.2° (23.5°) for the S-S distance, PF ratio, S-H distance, SFP angle, and PVR, respectively. The regression model for S-S distance had a mean slope of 2.18 that ranged from 1.98 to 2.41 when the sacrococcygeal joint was located superior to the symphysis. Results indicated that substantial errors occur when estimating the actual value of PSI from an anteroposterior radiograph. However, the change in PSI could be estimated from the S-S distance, which may aid surgeons to successfully increase head coverage through periacetabular osteotomy and to locate the acetabular cup in a functional position for total hip arthroplasty.

How to judge pelvic malposition when assessing acetabular index in children? Three simple parameters can determine acceptability

BACKGROUND

The acetabular index (AI) is the most commonly used parameter for diagnosing hip dysplasia. Pelvic malposition can result in misinterpretation of AI measurement especially in younger children. We aimed to investigate the correlation between pelvic orientation and acetabular index (AI) by using digital reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and identify reliable parameters predictive of pelvic orientation on plain radiographs.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 33 children (52 hips) who received dual source CT examinations. Virtual pelvic models were reconstructed after scanning. After orientating in the standard neutral position, the models were rotated and tilted around corresponding axes. DRRs were generated at every 3° during the process. The acetabular index, the horizontal diameter (Dh) and vertical diameter (Dv) of bilateral obturator foramina, the vertical distance (h) between upper border of pubic symphysis, and Hilgenreiner's line were measured on each DRR by two independent observers. Rotation index (Rr = right Dh/left Dh), tilt index (Rt = h/Dv), intra-observer error, and inter-observer error of AI were calculated.

RESULTS

For tilt and rotation up to 12.0°, AI increased with anterior tilt and decreased with posterior tilt. And for rotation, it increased on the side toward which the pelvis rotated and decreased on the opposite side. AI varied dramatically if angulation exceeded 6.0°. Malposition below this limit demonstrated the intra- and inter-observer errors were ± 2.0° and ± 3.0° respectively and caused no significant effect on AI measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

For children up to age 6 years, an acceptable pelvic plain radiograph can be determined when Rt is approximately between 0.9 and 1.4 and Rr between 0.7 and 1.5. For the first time, we have identified parameters derived from a group of subjects which can predict this degree of malposition. The parameters obturator diameters (Dh), obturator height (Dv), and distance (h) between symphysis and Hilgengreiner's line can be feasibly measured on X-ray and employed in clinical practice to assess the acceptability of the pediatric pelvic radiograph prior to measurement of the AI.

Spinopelvic Characteristics in Acetabular Retroversion: Does Pelvic Tilt Change After Periacetabular Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND

Acetabular retroversion may lead to impingement and pain, which can be treated with an anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (aPAO). Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation; as pelvic tilt angle reduces, acetabular version reduces. Thus, acetabular retroversion may be a deformity secondary to abnormal pelvic tilt (functional retroversion) or an anatomic deformity of the acetabulum and the innominate bone (pelvic ring).

PURPOSE

To (1) measure the spinopelvic morphology in patients with acetabular retroversion and (2) assess whether pelvic tilt changes after successful anteverting PAO (aPAO), thus testing whether preoperative pelvic tilt was compensatory.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 48 hips (42 patients; 30 ± 7 years [mean ± SD]) with acetabular retroversion that underwent successful aPAO was studied. Spinopelvic morphology (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, anterior pelvic plane, and sacral slope) was measured from computed tomography scans including the sacral end plate in 21 patients, with adequate images. In addition, the change in pelvic tilt with aPAO was measured via the sacrofemoral-pubic angle with supine pelvic radiographs at an interval of 2.5 ± 2 years.

RESULTS

The spinopelvic characteristics included a pelvic tilt of 4° ± 4°, a sacral slope of 39° ± 9°, an anterior pelvic plane angle of 11° ± 5°, and a pelvic incidence of 42° ± 10°. Preoperative pelvic tilt was 4° ± 4° and did not change postoperatively (4° ± 4°) (P = .676).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic tilt in acetabular retroversion was within normal parameters, illustrating "normal" sagittal pelvic balance and values similar to those reported in the literature in healthy subjects. In addition, it did not change after aPAO. Thus, acetabular retroversion was not secondary to a maladaptive pelvic tilt (functional retroversion). Further work is required to assess whether retroversion is a reflection of a pelvic morphological abnormality rather than an isolated acetabular abnormality. Treatment of acetabular retroversion should focus on correcting the deformity rather than attempting to change the functional pelvic position.

The Berbeo-Sardi Angle (BSA): An Innovative Method to Effectively Estimate Pelvic Retroversion in Anteroposterior Radiographs-A Correlation With Traditional Parameters

STUDY

Design: Diagnostic studies-concordance between diagnostic tests.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to develop a novel spinopelvic parameter (Berbeo-Sardi angle [BSA], the angle formed at the intersection of a line that connects the inferior margin of the sacroiliac joint to the midpoint of a horizontal line joining both femoral heads) measurable in anteroposterior radiographs that indirectly estimates pelvic retroversion and correlates with traditional measurements like pelvic tilt (PT).

SUMMARY

Sagittal balance appraisal and surgical planning rely on the interpretation of spinopelvic parameters. An increased PT reflects pelvic retroversion as a compensatory mechanism to limit sagittal imbalance and correlates with increased pain and disability. However, poor imaging techniques and incorrect patient positioning frequently hamper landmark identification in lateral radiographs, and with no measurable angles in anteroposterior radiographs, it is often impossible to determine PT and pelvic retroversion.

METHODS

Whole-spine radiographs from 105 consecutive patients were used to retrospectively measure conventional spinopelvic parameters and the BSA. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess a quantitative correlation between the PT and BSA as indirect measures of pelvic retroversion.

RESULTS

Average values for pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, PT, and BSA were 46.5° (±10.23), 48.56° (±12.30), 29.97° (±9.77), 16.94° (±8.03), and 54.47° (±4.05), respectively. We encountered a moderately strong correlation (r = -0.66) between PT and BSA. Receiver operating characteristic plot analysis revealed that a BSA threshold of 46° has a sensitivity of 90% to identify pathologic PT values (>20°), whereas a BSA ≥60° has a specificity of 90% to rule out pelvic retroversion using anteroposterior radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a moderately strong correlation between the BSA, an innovative spinopelvic parameter measurable in anteroposterior radiographs, and PT. BSA seems to show great promise in simplifying spinopelvic appraisal by easily estimating pelvic retroversion associated with sagittal imbalance, while avoiding image-quality issues often encountered in lateral radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Posterior Use of BMP-2 in Cervical Deformity Surgery Does Not Result in Increased Early Complications: A Prospective Multicenter Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the rate of short-term complications following the posterior use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in cervical deformity (CD) surgery.

METHODS

CD patients from 2013 to 2015 were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter database. Patients were divided into those receiving rhBMP-2 (BMP) and no rhBMP-2 (NOBMP). The relationship between BMP use, demographic variables surgical variables, radiographic parameters and complications was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (47 BMP, 53 NOBMP) were included. Follow-up time averaged 7.6 months (range 3-12 months). An average of 13.6mg of BMP was used per person with 1.49 mg per level. Compared with the NOBMP group, patients in the BMP group were older (P = .03). BMP was more commonly used in patients that and had longer prior fusions (6.0 vs 2.5, P < .01). There were no differences between groups with regards to a history of surgery, Charlson Comorbidity Index, estimated blood loss, operation time, fusion levels, and surgical approach. The maintenance of radiographic parameters at 6-month follow-up was similar. There were no differences in terms of total complication incidence, total complications per person, major complications per person or any specific complication. Linear regression and Pearson correlation analysis did not reveal any strong r² values (r² = 0.09, 0.08, 0.06) between the use of BMP and complications (major or operative).

CONCLUSIONS

BMP use was not directly associated with an increased incidence of early complications in this prospective cohort of operative adult CD patients. Its use was associated with increased number of levels instrumented and fused.

Assessment of pelvic tilt in anteroposterior radiographs by means of tilt ratios

INTRODUCTION

In anteposterior (AP) radiographs, cup position in total hip arthroplasty and acetabular anatomy in hip-preserving surgery are highly influenced by pelvic tilt. The sagittal rotation of the anterior pelvic plane is an important measurement of pelvic tilt during hip surgery. Thus, correct evaluation of cup position and acetabular parameters requires the assessment of pelvic tilt in AP radiographs.

METHODS

Changes in pelvic tilt inversely change the height of the lesser pelvis and the obturator foramen in AP radiographs. Tilt ratios were calculated by means of these two parameters in simulated radiographs for ten male and ten female pelvises in defined tilt positions. A tilt formula obtained by exponential regression analysis was evaluated by two blinded investigators by means of 14 simulated AP radiographs of the pelvis with pelvic tilts ranging from + 15° to - 15°.

RESULTS

No differences were found between male and female tilt ratios for each 5° step of simulated pelvic tilt. Pelvic tilt and tilt ratios correlated exponentially. Using the tilt formula, the two blinded investigators were able to assess pelvic tilt with high conformity, a mean relative error of + 0.4° (SD ± 4.6°), and a mean absolute error of 3.9° (SD ± 2.3°). Neutral pelvic tilt is indicated by a tilt ratio of 0.5 when the height of the lesser pelvis is twice the height of the obturator foramen.

CONCLUSION

The analysis and interpretation of cup position and acetabular parameters may be improved by our method for assessing pelvic tilt in AP radiographs.

Assessment of the Relationship between Pelvic Tilt and the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Angle in Middle-Aged and Elderly Asian Individuals

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pelvic tilt (PT) and the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, which is easier to identify than PT, in middle-aged and elderly Asian subjects from the general population.

Overview of Literature

Measuring PT is important in the diagnosis and treatment of adult spinal deformity. However, identifying femoral heads, which are necessary to determine PT, using sagittal radiographs is often difficult.

Methods

Standing coronal and sagittal pelvic radiographs of individuals aged more than 50 years were taken during a local medical examination. The subjects were divided into female, male, and total groups at the time of evaluation. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between PT and the SFP angle, which were obtained from the X-rays.

Results

The present study included 291 subjects. There were no statistically significant differences between the left and right SFP angles, and there was gender difference regarding the SFP angle. However, a gender difference was observed regarding PT. The correlation between PT and the SFP angle was substantiated in each group. Pearson's correlation coefficients between PT and the SFP angle in the total, female, and male groups were 0.696, 0.853, and 0.619, respectively. In the linear regression analysis, PT was calculated as follows: PT=60.1-0.77×(SFP angle) in the total group, PT=62.8-0.80×(SFP angle) in the female group, and PT=51.5-0.64×(SFP angle) in the male group.

Conclusions

A significant correlation between PT and the SFP angle was observed in middle-aged and elderly Asian subjects from the general population.

Pelvic Tilt Evaluation From Frontal Radiographs: The Validity, Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Parameter

BACKGROUND

The sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) parameter, calculated using the SFP angle measured on a frontal pelvis radiograph, has previously been shown to have a strong correlation with sagittal pelvic tilt (PT) measured on a lateral x-ray. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity, interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the SFP parameter in predicting the sagittal PT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 100 patients with frontal and lateral radiographs of the pelvis. Two observers independently measured the SFP angle on frontal x-ray (midpoint of S1 end plate to centroid of acetabula to upper midpoint of the pubic symphysis) and PT on lateral x-ray (midpoint of sacral plate to the centroid of acetabula to vertical plane). The SFP parameter was defined using the equation: SFP parameter = 75 - SFP angle. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were calculated using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity of the SFP parameter was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The intraobserver reproducibility of the SFP parameter was excellent (ICC >0.90) for both observers. The interobserver reliability of all measurements was substantial for the SFP parameter (ICC >0.80) and PT (ICC >0.70). The concurrent validity of the SFP parameter was substantial (r = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Calculating PT from a frontal radiograph using the equation for the SFP parameter is a valid, reliable, and reproducible formula that may be used to predict sagittal PT.

Epidemiology and associated radiographic spinopelvic parameters of symptomatic degenerative lumbar scoliosis: are radiographic spinopelvic parameters associated with the presence of symptoms or decreased quality of life in degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the epidemiology of radiographic degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and symptomatic DLS and clarify the impact of radiographic spinopelvic parameters on the presence of symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in DLS subjects.

METHODS

We obtained the age, gender, screening for chronic low back pain (CLBP) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), QOL assessments and X-rays of the thoracolumbar spine from 254 patients from the general population for this study. The prevalence of DLS and symptomatic DLS were estimated and factors associated with symptoms, and the QOL in the DLS subjects was analysed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of radiographic and symptomatic DLS was 19.2 and 7.8 %, respectively. A female gender (p = 0.018) and decreased sacral slope (p = 0.025) were associated with the presence of CLBP in the DLS subjects. A higher age was also associated with the presence of LSS in these subjects (p = 0.007), whereas the Cobb angle was found to be close the limit for significance (p = 0.063). The sacro-femoral-pubic angle and Cobb angle correlated with the EuroQol-5 dimensions utility score (r = 0.314, p = 0.014) and EuroQol-visual analogue scale score (r = -0.291, p = 0.043), respectively. Lumbar lordosis and body mass index correlated with the lumbar function (r = 0.285, p = 0.047) and visual analogue scale for leg pain (r = 0.328, p = 0.022) on the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Questionnaire, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of radiographic DLS in this study was approximately 20 % and roughly 40 % of the DLS subjects had symptoms. Some spinopelvic parameters may impact the occurrence of symptoms and the QOL in DLS subjects.

A new sagittal parameter to estimate pelvic tilt using the iliac cortical density line and iliac tilt: a retrospective X-ray measurement study

Background

When spinal kyphosis increases, the compensatory mechanism activates and the pelvic position changes. Increasing the pelvic tilt, which is the orientation of the pelvis with respect to the femoral head, is known to associate with the clinical symptoms in kyphosis in the aging population. It is often difficult to detect the femoral head on radiographs, limiting the ability to determine the pelvic tilt. Therefore, there is a need to establish another parameter independent of the femoral head which closely correlates with the pelvic tilt.

Methods

Eighty-two adult patients with full-length lateral standing spine radiographs were recruited (mean age: 73.0 years). A new parameter, the iliac cortical density line (a component of the arcuate line of the ilium) and the iliac tilt (defined as the angle between the iliac cortical density line and the vertical), was analyzed to determine the correlation with the pelvic tilt.

Results

Both the pelvic tilt (PT) and iliac tilt (IT) could be identified in 67 patients, and a significant correlation was observed between the PT and IT (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001). The PT could be estimated using the following formula: PT = IT − 12.9 (in females), PT = IT − 16.7 (in males).

Conclusions

The iliac tilt, which can be easily and directly measured using the iliac cortical density line, is a new parameter that can reliably estimate the pelvic tilt even when the femoral head is not detectable on the radiograph.

Evaluation of demographic factors affecting predictability of the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in healthy adolescents

The objectives of the present study are to evaluate the correlation between pelvic tilt (PT) and the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle in Asian healthy adolescents, to provide the normal value of SFP angle as reference data in Asian adolescents, and to clarify whether the predictability of PT could be affected by gender and ontogenesis. In all, 100 girls with a mean age of 12.66 years (range 8-18 years) and 70 boys with a mean age of 13.35 years (range 8-18 years) were recruited in this retrospective study. SFP angles and PT were obtained on long-cassette standing upright radiographs. The subjects were grouped based on age. Independent-sample t-tests were performed to compare age, SFP angle, and PT between genders. In all age groups, the relationship between SFP angle and PT was analyzed by Pearson's correlation analysis and linear regression analysis, respectively. Reliability analysis showed high intra- and inter-observer agreements in PT and SFP, with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.8. SFP angle averaged 71.64° ± 4.91 in all the normal subjects, of which the mean PT was 72.03°± 4.94 in the female group and 71.09°± 4.83 in the male group. SFP and PT were strongly correlated in all the age groups according to Pearson's correlation analysis. The overall coefficient was 0.679 in girls and 0.584 in boys. The present study is the first to describe the normal value of SFP angle in healthy Asian adolescents to serve as a reference data. In all age groups, SFP angles can be used to predict PT when lateral radiographs do not permit assessment of PT. The predictability of SFP angle for PT was not affected by gender or maturation status.

Can pelvic tilt be predicated by the sacrofemoral-pubic angel in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective radiographical study.

OBJECTIVE

To construct a predictive model for pelvic tilt (PT) based on the sacrofemoral-pubic (SFP) angle in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (or AS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PT is a key pelvic parameter in the regulation of spine sagittal alignment that can be used to plan the appropriate osteotomy angle in patients with AS with thoracolumbar kyphosis. However, it could be difficult to measure PT in patients with femoral heads poorly visualized on lateral radiographs. Previous studies showed that the SFP angle could be used to evaluate PT in adult patients with scoliosis. However, this method has not been validated in patients with AS.

METHODS

A total of 115 patients with AS with thoracolumbar kyphosis were included. Full-length anteroposterior and lateral spine radiographs were all available, with spinal and pelvic anatomical landmarks clearly identified. PT, SFP angle, and global kyphosis were measured. The patients were randomly divided into group A (n=65) and group B (n=50). In group A, the predictive model for PT was constructed by the results of the linear regression analysis. In group B, the predictive ability and accuracy of the predictive model were investigated.

RESULTS

In group A, the Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between the SFP angle and PT (r=0.852; P<0.001). The predictive model for PT was constructed as PT=72.3-0.82×(SFP angle). In group B, PT was predicted by the model with a mean error of 4.6° (SD=4.5°) with a predictive value of 78%.

CONCLUSION

PT can be accurately predicted by the SFP angle using the current model: PT=72.3-0.82×(SFP angle), when the femur heads are poorly visualized on lateral radiographs in patients with AS with thoracolumbar kyphosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Objective parallel-forms reliability assessment of 3 dimension real time body posture screening tests

BACKGROUND

Screening tests play a significant role in rapid and reliable assessment of normal individual development in the entire population of children and adolescents. Body posture screening tests carried out at schools reveal that 50-60% of children and adolescents demonstrate body posture abnormalities, with 10% of this group at risk for progressive spinal deformities. This necessitates the search for effective and economically feasible forms of screening diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of clinical evaluation of body posture compared to objective assessment with the Zebris CMS-10 system (Zebris Medical GmbH).

METHODS

The study enrolled 13-15-year-old pupils attending a junior secondary school (mean age 14.2 years). The study group consisted of 138 participants, including 71 girls and 67 boys, who underwent a clinical evaluation of the body posture and an examination with the Zebris CMS 10 system.

RESULTS

Statistically significant discrepancies between the clinical and objective evaluation were noted with regard to lumbar lordosis in boys (n = 67) and thoracic kyphosis in girls (n = 71). No statistically significant differences in both groups were noted for pelvic rotation and trunk position in the frontal plane.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The finding of significant discrepancies between the results of assessment in the sagittal plane obtained in the clinical examination and Zebris CMS-10-based assessment suggests that clinical evaluation should be used to provide a general estimation of accentuation or reduction of spinal curvatures in the sagittal plane.2. The clinical evaluation of posture is reliable with regard to assessment in the frontal plane.3. The Zebris CMS-10 system makes the clinical examination significantly more objective with regard to assessment of the physiological curvatures and may be used to make screening tests more objective with regard to detecting postural defects.

Estimation of sagittal pelvic orientation from frontal standard radiograph using the sacral-femoral-pubic angle: feasibility study in the pediatric population

PURPOSE

Pelvic tilt is usually measured on a full spine sagittal view. The sacral-femoral-pubic angle (SFP) has been previously described as a reproducible method to estimate pelvic tilt on a pelvis AP view. The aim of our study is to determine the reliability of the extrapolated pelvic tilt (ePT) using the SFP angle in the pediatric population.

METHODS

We selected 240 full spine X-rays in our pediatric imaging database. The cohort was equally distributed according gender and age. The following parameters were measured: SFP angle on the AP view, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS) on the sagittal view. Concordance between the measured pelvic tilt (mPT) and the calculated (ePT) value of PT was tested by a correlation test. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested for each parameter using ANOVA.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 240 children aged from 1 to 20 years (mean age 10.7 years). Mean SFP angle was 68.98° ± 6.8, mPT was 6.67° ± 8.56, ePT was 6.04° ± 6.79. The mean PI (45.04° ± 11.09) and SS (38.63° ± 8.12) were comparable to previously published pediatric data according to age groups. Intra- and inter-observer reliability showed acceptable correlation. Concordance between mPT and ePT was higher in older children (patients >10 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Estimated value of pelvic tilt using the SFP angle showed acceptable correlation to the pelvic tilt measured on sagittal view of the pelvis in children over 10 years. However, correlation rates were lower than previous publication in adult population. This simple method could accurately estimate the pelvic orientation on a single frontal view of the pelvis, which may be of particular interest in understanding the relationship between pelvic orientation and hip pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.