The influence of preoperative MRI findings on lumbar fusion clinical outcomes

Effect of Baseline Adjacent Segment Degeneration on Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

End-stage degenerative segments above fusion levels have been associated with lower rates for surgical adjacent segment disease. We aimed to explore how this degeneration translates into patient reported outcomes.

METHODS

A consecutive series of lumbar fusion patients for degenerative pathologies were enrolled. Preoperative cranial adjacent segment degeneration status was determined using the Combined Imaging Score (CIS). Based on CIS, patients were trichotomized into mild (CIS <7), advanced (CIS 7-10), and end-stage (CIS >10) degeneration tertiles. In analysis, tertiles were adjusted for age, sex, and fusion length to control for potential confounders. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was collected at baseline, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years.

RESULTS

197 patients were included. Postoperative improvements were similar across all CIS tertiles at all time-points, except for the marginal 10-point difference at 2-years, in favor of higher degeneration. Despite similar changes, end-stage degeneration (CIS >10) implied marginally lower disability levels at baseline and throughout follow-up.The 10-year all-cause mechanical reoperation rate was lowest in the third tertile (28%, 27%, 22%). Reoperation history was associated with greater disability among advanced degeneration (CIS 7-10); the ODI score difference 9 points, P = .009. Postoperative sagittal alignment was not reflected on physical performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative adjacent segment degeneration status was only marginally reflected on 10-year disability outcomes. End-stage adjacent segment degeneration signaled lower reoperation risk and favorable functional outcomes. Our findings support the assumption that collapsed, end-stage degenerative segments without stenosis can be safely excluded from fusion constructs.

Delphi-Based Expert Consensus Statements for the Management of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Neurotomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

A modified Delphi strategy was implemented for obtaining recommendations that could be useful in the management of percutaneous radiofrequency treatment of lumbar facet joint syndrome, as the literature on the argument was poor in quality.

METHODS

An Italian research team conducted a comprehensive literature search, defined the investigation topics (diagnosis, treatment, and outcome evaluation), and developed an explorative semi-structured questionnaire. They also selected the members of the panel. After an online meeting with the participants, the board developed a structured questionnaire of 15 closed statements (round 1). A five-point Likert scale was used and the cut-off for consensus was established at a minimum of 70% of the number of respondents (level of agreement ≥ 4, agree or strongly agree). The statements without consensus were rephrased (round 2).

RESULTS

Forty-one clinicians were included in the panel and responded in both rounds. After the first round, consensus (≥ 70%) was obtained in 9 out of 15 statements. In the second round, only one out of six statements reached the threshold. The lack of consensus was observed for statements concerning the use of imaging for a diagnosis [54%, median 4, interquartile range (IQR) 3-5], number of diagnostic blocks (37%, median 4, IQR 2-4), bilateral denervation (59%, median 4, IQR 2-4), technique and number of lesions (66%, median 4, IQR 3-5), and strategy after denervation failure (68%, median 4, IQR 3-4).

CONCLUSION

Results of the Delphi investigations suggest that there is a need to define standardized protocols to address this clinical problem. This step is essential for designing high-quality studies and filling current gaps in scientific evidence.

Evaluating the Impact of Modic Changes on Operative Treatment in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Modic changes (MCs) are believed to be potential pain generators in the lumbar and cervical spine, but it is currently unclear if their presence affects postsurgical outcomes. We performed a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All studies evaluating cervical or lumbar spine postsurgical outcomes in patients with documented preoperative MCs were included. A total of 29 studies and 6013 patients with 2688 of those patients having preoperative MCs were included. Eight included studies evaluated cervical spine surgery, eleven evaluated lumbar discectomies, nine studied lumbar fusion surgery, and three assessed lumbar disc replacements. The presence of cervical MCs did not impact the clinical outcomes in the cervical spine procedures. Moreover, most studies found that MCs did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion, lumbar discectomy, or lumbar disc replacement. A meta-analysis of the relevant data found no significant association between MCs and VAS back pain or ODI following lumbar discectomy. Similarly, there was no association between MCs and JOA or neck pain following ACDF procedures. Patients with MC experienced statistically significant improvements following lumbar or cervical spine surgery. The postoperative improvements were similar to patients without MCs in the cervical and lumbar spine.

High-Intensity Zones on MRI of the Cervical Spine in Patients: Epidemiology and Association With Pain and Disability

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to address the prevalence, distribution, and clinical significance of cervical high-intensity zones (HIZs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to pain and other patient-reported outcomes in the setting of patients that will undergo an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of ACDF patients surgically treated at a single center from 2008 to 2015. Based on preoperative MRI, HIZ subtypes were identified as either traditional T2-hyperintense, T1-hypointense ("single-HIZs"), or combined T1- and T2-hyperintense ("dual-HIZs"), and their level-specific prevalence was assessed. Preoperative symptoms, patient-reported outcomes, and disc degeneration pathology were assessed in relation to HIZs and HIZ subtypes.

RESULTS

Of 861 patients, 58 demonstrated evidence of HIZs in the cervical spine (6.7%). Single-HIZs and dual-HIZs comprised 63.8% and 36.2% of the overall HIZs, respectively. HIZs found outside of the planned fusion segment reported better preoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI; P = .049) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Arm (P = .014) scores relative to patients without HIZs. Furthermore, patients with single-HIZs found inside the planned fusion segment had worse VAS Neck (P = .045) and VAS Arm (P = .010) scores. In general, dual-HIZ patients showed no significant differences across all clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the clinical significance of HIZs in the cervical spine, noting level-specific and clinical outcome-specific variations. Single-HIZs were associated with significantly more pain when located inside the fusion segment, while dual-HIZs showed no associations with patient-reported outcomes. The presence of single-HIZs may correlate with concurrent spinal pathologies and should be more closely evaluated.

Impact of High-intensity Zones on Their Corresponding Lumbar Spine Segments: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare disks with and without high-intensity zones (HIZ) to understand the impact of an HIZ on the stability of corresponding lumbar spinal segments.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have established a relationship between back pain and the presence of HIZ on T2-weighted images of magnetic resonance imaging. These previous studies, however, used either plain radiographs or static (neutral position) magnetic resonance imaging to assess their chosen variables.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 140 consecutive patients with MR images taken in weight-bearing neutral, flexion, and extension positions. We separated segments into those with HIZ and without HIZ and assessed the grade of disk degeneration for each segment. Subsequently, a matched control group was selected from the segments without HIZ. Multiple factors were compared in a univariate analysis. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between angular range of motion (ROM) >10 degrees and translational motion >2 mm with multiple independent variables.

RESULTS

Upon assessment of the 700 lumbar segments, 70 (10%) segments had an HIZ and 68 patients had a single HIZ. On univariate analysis, the presence of an HIZ was not found to be significantly associated with degree of fatty muscle degeneration (P=0.969), muscle volume (P=0.646), degree of facet joint osteoarthritis (P=0.706), intervertebral disk height (P=0.077), Modic change (P=0.951), lower endplate shape (P=0.702), upper endplate shape (P=0.655), or degree of disk degeneration (P=0.607). Multifactorial analysis showed that none of the independent variables significantly correlated with angular ROM >10 degrees. For translational motion, the only significant correlation was the Goutallier classification (P=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of HIZ did not significantly affect spinal stability as measured by angular ROM and translational motion and was not associated with significant changes in several quantitative measurements of spine pathology.

Development of a Multivariate Prediction Model for Successful Oswestry Disability Index Changes in L5/S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease

OBJECTIVE

Lower back pain associated with degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has been shown to be effective for treating refractory DDD, but it remains unclear which patients may benefit most from the procedure. This study aims to develop a predictive model for clinical success in L5/S1 ALIF for DDD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 68 patients with refractory DDD who underwent L5/S1 ALIF was performed. Clinical success was defined as an improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of 20 points postoperatively. Exploratory analyses were performed on 16 preoperative clinical and radiographic parameters, followed by a multivariate logistic regression. Evaluation of the predictive model was performed.

RESULTS

After exploratory analyses, 4 parameters were suitable for inclusion in the multivariate model. Workers' compensation status (odds ratio [OR], 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.001-0.262; P = 0.004) and preoperative ODI (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23; P = 0.002) were statistically significant parameters. Furthermore, posterior disc height and disc depth contributed significantly to the model variance (OR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.44-1.09 and OR, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.81-1.15, respectively). The model had a sensitivity of 81.5%, specificity of 83.3%, C-statistic of 0.921, and a calibration plot similar to the 45° reference line.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis confirms workers' compensation and low preoperative ODI as risk factors for successful L5/S1 ALIF performed for DDD. It also identifies novel prognostic factors, namely posterior disc height and disc depth. This model can aid in patient counseling and selection in the management of L5/S1 DDD.

Surgical outcomes of full endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation over a 10-year period: A retrospective study

Objective

Full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has become popular in recent years. Previous studies have proven the efficacy, but few have discussed the possible risk factors of poor outcome. In this study, we reviewed patients who underwent FELD at Changhua Christian Hospital in the past 10 years and sought to identify factors associated with poor surgical outcomes and re-operations.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records from mid-2009 to mid-2018. Patients had undergone FELD and follow-up for ≥1 year were included. Factors included in the outcome evaluations were age, sex, surgical time, body mass index, surgical methods, disc herniation type, extension of herniation, degree of canal compromised, disc degenerative grade, smoking and alcohol use, surgical lumbar level, symptom duration, Oswestry low back disability index, and visual analog scale score. We had evolved from inside-out methods to outside-in methods after 2016, thus, we included this factor in the analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were poor/fair MacNab score and re-operation.

Results

From mid-2009 to mid-2018, 521 patients met our criteria and were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1685 days (range, 523–3923 days). Thirty-one (6.0%) patients had poor surgical outcomes (fair/poor MacNab score) and 45 (8.6%) patients required re-operation. Prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.047), higher lumbar level (P = 0.026), longer preoperative symptoms (P < 0.001), and surgery before 2017 (outside-in technique, P = 0.020) were significant factors associated with poor outcomes in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.030), and higher lumbar level (P = 0.046) were statistically significant. The most common adverse symptom was numbness. Factors possibly associated with higher re-operation rate were older age (P = 0.045), alcohol use (P = 0.073) and higher lumbar level (P = 0.069). Only alcohol use showed statistically significant re-operation rates in multivariate analyses (P = 0.035).

Conclusions

For treating LDH by FELD, we concluded that prolapsed disc, higher disc degenerative grade, higher lumbar level, and longer preoperative symptom duration were possibly associated with unsatisfactory surgical outcomes (poor/fair MacNab score). The outside-in technique might be superior to the inside-out technique. Older age and alcohol use might be associated with a higher re-operation rate.

Use of "Inside-Out" Technique for Direct Visualization of a Vacuum Vertically Unstable Intervertebral Disc During Routine Lumbar Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression-A Correlative Study of Clinical Outcomes and the Prognostic Value of Lumbar Radiographs

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to record the frequency of lumbar intervertebral disc vacuum phenomenon on routine lumbar plain films taken prior to transforaminal endoscopic decompression surgery for sciatica-type leg and back pain and to correlate it with visualized intradiscal pathology and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective case series study of 200 consecutive patients with an average mean follow-up of 41.85 months who underwent lumbar endoscopic transforaminal decompression at 236 lumbar levels was conducted. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of vacuum phenomenon on preoperative x-ray to predict the presence of an empty vacuum disc found during transforaminal microdiscectomy using the "inside-out" approach were calculated using the YESS™ technique. Clinical outcomes were assessed by both Macnab criteria and visual analog score (VAS) reduction.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients evaluated, 124 (62%) were deemed to have a vacuum disc on intraoperative probing using the "inside-out" technique. During needle insertion the more severely degenerative discs are met with negative pressures manifested by an air discogram. According to Macnab criteria, all patients who also had extruded disc herniations had excellent results (8 of 200), with the mean VAS decreasing from 6.1 ± 2.6 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 1.4 at the final follow-up (P < .01). This indicates a more severely degenerative disc causing nonspecific back pain due to lack of anterior column support from the intervertebral disc, accentuating foraminal stenosis. Patients with contained disc herniations (62 of 200) had excellent and good results 82.2% of the time. The mean VAS decreased from 6.9 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 2.2 ± 1.1 at final follow-up (P < .01). This identifies the disc as a contributing factor in low back pain. It can also identify the disc and annulus in combination with foraminal stenosis as a contributing factor. In the spinal stenosis group (130 of 200), 81.5% of patients had excellent to good results, and the mean VAS decreased from 6.3 ± 1.5 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 1.2 at final follow-up (P < .01). An analysis of lumbar x-ray vacuum phenomenon in patients with visualized vacuum disc showed true-positive (35 patients) and false-negative (89 patients), compared with an x-ray negative grading in patients without intraoperatively visualized vacuum disc of false-positive (2 patients); and true-negative (74 patients); this allowed for calculation of sensitivity (28.2%), specificity (97.4%), and positive predictive value (94.6%) of preoperative diagnostic x-ray in relation to intraoperatively visualized presence of the vacuum disc during subsequent endoscopic decompression surgery. Direct endoscopic visualization of the inside of the vacuum disc revealed longitudinal fissuring of the intervertebral disc as the most common finding in 77 of the 124 patients (62.1%) with a vacuum disc. Cavitation with delamination was the second most common observation (21 patients). Fair outcomes were associated with cavitation and delamination of the intervertebral disc from the endplates (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A vacuum phenomenon seen on lumbar x-rays is highly specific for a source of one component that is actually a multiple source of nonspecific common back pain. A vacuum disc being found during "inside-out" transforaminal discectomy actually encompasses the disc, annulus, and foraminal stenosis as a multifactorial source of nonspecific common back pain. Further studies of better prognosticators of failed endoscopic transforaminal discectomy are required and are underway by the coauthors.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes in Nonspecific Low-Back Pain Patients With and Without Modic Changes Who Receive Chiropractic Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference in outcomes in patients with nonspecific low back pain, both with and without Modic changes (MCs), who received chiropractic care.

METHODS

This prospective outcomes study included 112 patients with low back pain without disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were treated with spinal manipulative therapy. At baseline, the numerical rating scale (NRS) and Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) for disability were collected. The NRS, BQ, and Patient's Global Impression of Change (primary outcome) were collected at the follow-up time points of 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months to assess overall improvement. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed for the presence of MCs and, if present, classified as Modic I or II. The χ² test was used to compare the proportion of patients reporting clinically relevant "improvement" between patients with and without MCs and between Modic I and Modic II patients. The unpaired Student t test was used to compare NRS and BQ at baseline and change scores at all follow-up time points.

RESULTS

For the primary outcome measure, the proportion of patients reporting relevant "improvement" (Patient's Global Impression of Change), and for the secondary outcome measures (NRS and BQ change scores), there were no significant differences between Modic positive and Modic negative patients or between Modic I and Modic II patients.

CONCLUSION

Neither the presence nor absence of MCs nor the Modic change category were related to treatment outcomes for patients with low back pain without disc herniation who received chiropractic care.

The usefulness of radiological grading scales to predict pain intensity, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life after surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to determine the relationship of radiological grading scales of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) with postoperative pain intensity, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

Response to surgical treatment at 6 weeks (W6) on the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry-Disability (ODI) and Roland-Morris Disability Index (RMDI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, EuroQol (EQ) 5D, and Short-Form Health-Survey (SF-12) physical component summary (PCS) was compared between patients with different Modic (MOD) and Pfirrmann (PFI) grades. Longitudinal outcomes at day 3 (D3), W6, 6 months (M6), and 1 year (Y1) were compared.

RESULTS

The study included 338 patients (mean age, 58.6 years), of which n = 202 (59.8%) had MOD 1-3 and n = 217 (64.2%) PFI 4-5 changes. Patients with MOD 1-3 were as likely as patients without MOD changes to be treatment-responders at W6 in terms of VAS leg pain, ODI, RMDI, TUG, EQ5D, and SF-12 PCS. Similarly, patients with PFI 4-5 were as likely as patients with PFI 1-3 changes to be treatment-responders at W6. Longitudinal outcomes were similar at D3, W6, M6, and Y1 between patients with and without MOD changes. Patients with PFI 4-5 fared similar to those with PFI 1-3 except for inferior HRQoL on the SF-12 PCS metric at Y1.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no distinct relationship between commonly used radiological grading scales of lumbar DDD with clinical outcome. Therefore, no prognosis should be made on the grounds of preoperative PFI and MOD classifications for patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar DDD.

Comparison of Outcomes in MRI Confirmed Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients With and Without Modic Changes Treated With High Velocity, Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in outcomes between Modic positive and negative lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients treated with spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).

METHODS

This prospective outcomes study includes 72 MRI confirmed symptomatic LDH patients treated with SMT. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain and Oswestry disability data were collected at baseline. NRS, patient global impression of change to assess overall improvement, and Oswestry data were collected at 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year. MRI scans were analyzed for Modic change present/absent and classified as Modic I or II when present. Chi-squared test compared the proportion of patients reporting relevant 'improvement' between patients with and without Modic changes and those with Modic I vs. II. NRS and Oswestry scores were compared at baseline and change scores at all follow-up time points using the unpaired Student t test.

RESULTS

76.5% of Modic positive patients reported 'improvement' compared to 53.3% of Modic negative patients (P = .09) at 2 weeks. Modic positive patients had larger decreases in leg pain (P = .02) and disability scores (P = .012) at 2 weeks. Modic positive patients had larger reductions in disability levels at 3 (P = .049) and 6 months (P = .001). A significant difference (P = .001) between patients with Modic I vs. Modic II was found at 1 year, where Modic II patients did significantly better.

CONCLUSION

Modic positive patients reported higher levels of clinically relevant improvement 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months compared to Modic negative patients. However, at 1 year Modic I patients were significantly less likely to report 'improvement', suggesting they may be prone to relapse.

Lumbar spinal degenerative "microinstability": hype or hope? Proposal of a new classification to detect it and to assess surgical treatment

PURPOSE

The stage of unstable dysfunction, also defined as "active discopathy" by Nguyen in 2015 and configuring the first phase of the degenerative cascade described by Kirkaldy-Willis, has specific pathoanatomical and clinical characteristics (low back pain) in the interested vertebral segment, without the presence of spondylolisthesis in flexion-extension radiography. This clinical condition has been defined as "microinstability" (MI). The term has currently not been recognized by the scientific community and is subject of debate for its diagnostic challenge. MI indicates a clinical condition in which the patient has a degeneration of the lumbar spine, causing low back pain, and radiological examinations do not show a spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

We elaborated a clinical score test based on preoperative radiological examinations (static and dynamic X-Rays, CT and MRI) to detect and assess MI. Then, we enrolled 74 patients, all the levels from L1 to S1 were analysed, for a total amount of 370 retrospectively analysed levels. We excluded patients with degenerative scoliosis, as it is related to an advanced stage of degeneration. The test has been developed with the aim of furnishing quantitative data on the basis of the aforementioned radiological examinations and of elaborating a diagnosis and a treatment for the degenerative pathology in dysfunctional phase, responsible for low back pain.

RESULTS

We performed a statistical analysis on the results obtained from the test in terms of significativity and predictive value with a 1-year follow-up, calculating the p value and the χ (2) value.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with low back pain and negative dynamic X-Rays, an accurate analysis of the radiological exams (CT, MRI, X-Rays) allows to formulate a diagnosis of suspect MI with a good predictive value. This situation opens many clinical and medicolegal scenarios. The preliminary results seem to validate the test with a good predictive value, especially towards ASD, but they need further studies. On the basis of the results obtained, the test seems to allow a good classification of the dysfunctional phase of the degenerative cascade, identifying and classifying MI as a pathologic entity, defining its pathoanatomical and clinical relevance and elaborating a treatment algorithm.

A study on the cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion in accordance with Modic changes with a 2-year minimum follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim of this research is to analyze the influence of Modic types on the clinical results of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with a mean age of 55.8 ± 6.5 years were included in this study. Patients with Modic changes were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, 23 patients were classified as Modic-1, 39 patients were classified as Modic-2, and 44 patients were classified as Modic-0. Clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively and repeated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after operation.

RESULTS

In this study, all patients were followed up for a mean period of 30.2 months (range, from 24 to 36 months). Significant clinical improvement (P < 0.05) was observed in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and axial symptoms between the preoperative evaluation and the final follow-up. Comparing the result of mean JOA score after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the Modic-1 group and other groups, statistically significant differences could be found at 12 months after surgery (P < 0.05). Comparing the outcome visual analog scale (VAS) of axial symptoms among different groups after ACDF, patients with Modic-1 changes showed significantly lower VAS of axial symptoms postoperatively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

After anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion, both Modic-1 and Modic-2 groups showed excellent clinical outcomes over a 2-year follow-up. Better clinical results were achieved in patients with Modic-1 changes compared to the group of patients with Modic-2 and Modic-0 changes on magnetic resonance images.

A novel classification system of lumbar disc degeneration

The Pfirrmann and modified Pfirrmann grading systems are currently used to classify lumbar disc degeneration. These systems, however, do not incorporate variables that have been associated with lumbar disc degeneration, including Modic changes, a high intensity zone, and a significant reduction in disc height. A system that incorporates these variables that is easy to apply may be useful for research and clinical purposes. A grading system was developed that incorporates disc structure and brightness, presence or absence of Modic changes, presence or absence of a high intensity zone, and reduction in disc height (disc height less than 5mm). MRI of 300 lumbar discs in 60 patients were analyzed twice by two neurosurgeons. Intra and inter-observer reliabilities were assessed by calculating Cohen's κ values. There were 156 grade zero ("normal"), 50 grade one, 57 grade two, 26 grade three, 10 grade four, and one grade five ("worst") discs. Inter-observer reliability was substantial (κ = 0.66 to 0.77) for disc brightness/structure, Modic changes, and disc height. Inter-observer reliability was moderate (κ = 0.41) for high intensity zone. Intra-observer reliability was moderate to excellent (κ = 0.53 to 0.94) in all categories. Agreement on the total grade between reviewers occurred 71% of the time and a difference of one grade occurred in an additional 25% of cases. Lumbar disc degeneration can be graded reliably by this novel system. The advantage of this system is that it incorporates disc brightness/structure, Modic changes, high intensity zone, and a rigid definition of loss of disc height. This system might be useful in research studies evaluating disc degeneration. Further studies are required to demonstrate possible clinical utility in predicting outcomes after spinal treatments such as fusion.

Are Modic changes related to outcomes in lumbar disc herniation patients treated with imaging-guided lumbar nerve root blocks?

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after imaging-guided transforaminal lumbar nerve root blocks in MRI confirmed symptomatic disc herniation patients with and without Modic changes (MC).

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with MRI confirmed symptomatic lumbar disc herniations and an imaging-guided lumbar nerve root block injection who returned an outcomes questionnaire are included. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain data was collected prior to injection and 20-30 min after injection. NRS and overall improvement were assessed using the patient's global impression of change (PGIC) scale at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month post injection. The proportion of patients with and without MC on MRI as well as Modic I and Modic II was calculated. These groups were compared for clinically relevant 'improvement' using the Chi-squared test. Baseline and follow-up NRS scores were compared for the groups using the unpaired t-test.

RESULTS

346 patients are included with MC present in 57%. A higher percentage of patients without MC reported 'improvement' and a higher percentage of patients with MC reported 'worsening' but this did not reach statistical significance. The numerical scores on the PGIC and NRS scales showed that patients with MC had significantly higher pain and worse overall improvement scores at 1 month (p=0.048 and p=0.03) and a significantly lower 1 month NRS change score (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MRI confirmed symptomatic lumbar disc herniations and MC report significantly lower levels of pain reduction after a lumbar nerve root block compared to patients without MC.

Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

INTRODUCTION

Decompression with fusion is usually recommended in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). However, elderly patients with LSS and DLS often have other comorbidities, and surgical treatment must be both safe and effective. The aim of this study was to investigate whether decompression surgery alone alleviates low back pain (LBP) in patients with LSS and DLS, and to identify the predictors of postoperative residual LBP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 75 patients (33 males and 42 females) with a mean age of 71.8 years (range 53-86 years) who underwent decompression surgery for LSS with DLS (Cobb angle ≥ 10°) and had a minimum follow-up period of 1 year, were retrospectively reviewed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for the assessment of lumbar spinal diseases (JOA score). Radiographic measurements included coronal and sagittal Cobb angles, apical vertebral rotation (Nash-Moe method), and anteroposterior and lateral spondylolisthesis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the predictors of residual LBP after surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients had preoperative LBP, of which 29 (59.1 %) experienced postoperative relief of LBP. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the degree of apical vertebral rotation on preoperative radiography was significantly associated with postoperative residual LBP (odds ratio, 8.16, 95 % confidence interval, 1.55-83.81, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

A higher degree of apical vertebral rotation may therefore be an indicator of mechanical LBP in patients with LSS and DLS. Decompression with fusion should be recommended in these patients.

MRI assessment of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration with lumbar degenerative disease using the Pfirrmann grading systems

Background

To evaluate by MRI intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with lumbar degenerative disease using the Pfirrmann grading system and to determine whether Modic changes correlated with the Pfirrmann grades and modified Pfirrmann grades of disc degeneration.

Methods

The clinical data of 108 surgical patients with lumbar degenerative disease were reviewed and their preoperative MR images were analyzed. Disc degeneration was evaluated using the Pfirrmann grading system. Patients were followed up and low back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the effect of back pain on the daily quality of life was assessed using Oswestry disability index (ODI).

Results

Forty-four cases had normal anatomical appearance (Modic type 0) and their Pfirrmann grades were 3.77±0.480 and their modified Pfirrmann grades were of 5.81±1.006. Twenty-seven cases had Modic type I changes and their Pfirrmann grades were 4.79±0.557 and their modified Pfirrmann grades were 7.00±0.832. Thirty-six cases exhibited Modic type II changes and their Pfirrmann grades and modified Pfirrmann grades were 4.11±0.398 and 6.64±0.867, respectively. One case had Modic type III changes. Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant difference in modified Pfirrmann grade among Modic type 0, I and II changes (P<0.01) but no significant difference between Modic type I and II changes (P>0.05). Binary regression analysis showed that Modic changes correlated most strongly with disc degeneration. Follow up studies indicated that the VAS and ODI scores were markedly improved postoperatively. However, no difference was noted in VAS and ODI scores among patients with different Modic types.

Conclusion

Modic changes correlate with the Pfirrmann and modified Pfirrmann grades of disc degeneration in lumbar degenerative disease. There is no significant correlation between Modic types and surgical outcomes.