Sacrum pubic incidence and sacrum pubic posterior angle: two morphologic radiological parameters in assessing pelvic sagittal alignment in human adults

Sacrum1-pubic angle: a novel and alternative morphologic radiological parameter for assessing spinopelvic sagittal alignment in human adults

OBJECTIVE

Spinopelvic sagittal balance ensures efficient posture and minimizes energy expenditure by aligning the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities. Deviations can cause clinical issues like back pain and functional limitations. Key radiographic parameters, including pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL), are essential for evaluating spinal pathologies and planning surgeries. Accurate PI measurement is challenging in certain conditions, necessitating alternative parameters. This study aimed to introduce a new, easily measurable parameter and examine its reliability and correlation with established sagittal parameters.

METHODS

This study analyzed 107 asymptomatic adult volunteers (57 males and 50 females), with an average age of 36.75 years. Whole-spine radiographs in the standing position were taken using EOS technology. The established spinopelvic sagittal parameters and a novel parameter, sacrum1-pubic angle (S1PA), were measured. The correlation coefficient of each parameter, the regression equation of PI using S1PA, and the regression equation of PTα using PTβ were obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) was calculated to evaluate the measurement reliability.

RESULTS

Morphologic (S1PA, PI) and positional parameters (PTα, PTβ, PTγ, SS, LL) showed no significant gender differences (p > 0.05). S1PA had strong correlations with PI (r = -0.883, p < 0.001) and other parameters. PTα demonstrated a strong correlation with PTβ (r = -0.929, p < 0.001). PI could be predicted according to the regression equation: PI = 71.672 - 4.537 × S1PA (R² = 0.779, p < 0.001). The PTα could be predicted using the following equation: PTα = 67.245 - 0.865 × PTβ (R² = 0.864, p < 0.001). Reliability analysis showed high intra- and inter-rater agreement in all the spinopelvic parameters.

CONCLUSION

The S1PA is a dependable parameter for evaluating the morphology and orientation of the pelvis. PI could be precisely predicted using the S1PA. These insights are valuable for clinicians, enhancing their ability to assess spinopelvic sagittal alignment accurately.

Inadequate Annotation and Its Impact on Pelvic Tilt Measurement in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Accurate pre-surgical templating of the pelvic tilt (PT) angle is essential for hip and spine surgeries, yet the reliability of PT annotations is often compromised by human error, inherent subjectivity, and variations in radiographic quality. This study aims to identify challenges leading to inadequate annotations at a landmark dimension and evaluating their impact on PT.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 115 consecutive sagittal radiographs for the measurement of PT based on two definitions: the anterior pelvic plane and a line connecting the femoral head's centre to the sacral plate's midpoint. Five annotators engaged in the measurement, followed by a secondary review to assess the adequacy of the annotations across all the annotators.

RESULTS

The outcomes indicated that over 60% images had at least one landmark considered inadequate by the majority of the reviewers, with poor image quality, outliers, and unrecognized anomalies being the primary causes. Such inadequacies led to discrepancies in the PT measurements, ranging from -2° to 2°.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that landmarks annotated from clear anatomical references were more reliable than those estimated. It also underscores the prevalence of suboptimal annotations in PT measurements, which extends beyond the scope of traditional statistical analysis and could result in significant deviations in individual cases, potentially impacting clinical outcomes.

Posterior Pubic Incidence: A Novel Morphologic Spinopelvic Parameter Nearly Equal to Pelvic Incidence

BACKGROUND

Pelvic incidence (PI) and Jackson's angle are 2 major spinopelvic parameters that define the position of the sacrum within the pelvis. These parameters are measured on standing lateral radiography, and the identification of the hip axis is essential for measurements. Moreover, identifying the hip axis in patients with hip diseases or femoral head deformity is challenging. In this study, we described a novel parameter named posterior pubic incidence (PPI) that could be measured using the posterior pubic edge instead of the hip axis.

METHODS

Group A comprised 50 volunteers who underwent standing lateral lumbosacral radiography. Group B comprised 54 patients with abdominal or urologic problems who underwent supine computed tomography. The PI, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, PPI, and posterior pubic tilt were measured. The differences between PI and PPI were evaluated. Linear regression analysis was used to predict the PI value from PPI.

RESULTS

The mean PI and PPI values were 47.41° ± 12.32° and 49.32° ± 11.94° in group A and 49.19° ± 9.99° and 49.99° ± 9.25° in group B, respectively. The mean absolute differences in groups A and B were 2.41° ± 1.63° and 1.9° ± 1.62°, respectively. High correlations were obtained between PI/PPI and pelvic tilt/posterior pubic tilt. PI could be calculated as PI° = PPI° - 2° on plain radiography and as PI° = PPI° - 1° on computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI was strongly correlated with PI, which was nearly equal to PI, and may replace PI in formulas containing PI.

Does Sacrococcygeal Skeletal Morphology and Morphometry Influence Pressure Injury Formation in Adults?

GENERAL PURPOSE

To present a study that investigated sacrococcygeal skeletal structure as a possible nonmodifiable intrinsic risk factor for pressure injury and identify possible issues caused by its morphology.

TARGET AUDIENCE

This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES

After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Recognize the background information the authors considered when planning and conducting their study of sacrococcygeal skeletal structure as a possible pressure injury risk factor.2. Identify the characteristics of the two groups of study participants.3. Choose the results of the study clinicians may consider when implementing evidence-based practice.

Radiophobia Overreaction: College of Chiropractors of British Columbia Revoke Full X-Ray Rights Based on Flawed Study and Radiation Fear-Mongering

Fears over radiation have created irrational pressures to dissuade radiography use within chiropractic. Recently, the regulatory body for chiropractors practicing in British Columbia, Canada, the College of Chiropractors of British Columbia (CCBC), contracted Pierre Côté to review the clinical use of X-rays within the chiropractic profession. A "rapid review" was performed and published quickly and included only 9 papers, the most recent dating from 2005; they concluded, "Given the inherent risks of radiation, we recommend that chiropractors do not use radiographs for the routine and repeat evaluation of the structure and function of the spine." The CCBC then launched an immediate review of the use of X-rays by chiropractors in their jurisdiction. Member and public opinion were gathered but not presented to their members. On February 4, 2021, the College announced amendments to their Professional Conduct Handbook that revoked X-ray rights for routine/repeat assessment and management of patients with spine disorders. Here, we highlight current and historical evidence that substantiates that X-rays are not a public health threat. We also point out critical and insurmountable flaws in the single paper used to support irrational and unscientific policy that discriminates against chiropractors who practice certain forms of evidence-based X-ray-guided methods.

Sacral incidence to pubis: a novel and alternative morphologic radiological parameter to pelvic incidence in assessing spinopelvic sagittal alignment

Background

Although pelvic incidence (PI) is a key morphologic parameter in assessing spinopelvic sagittal alignment, accurate measurements of PI become difficult in patients with severe hip dislocation or femoral head deformities. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of our novel morphologic parameters and the correlations with established sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

Methods

One hundred healthy volunteers (25 male and 75 female), with an average age of 38.9 years, were analysed. Whole-body alignment in the standing position was measured using a slot-scanning X-ray imager. We measured the established spinopelvic sagittal parameters and a novel parameter: the sacral incidence to pubis (SIP). The correlation coefficient of each parameter, regression equation of PI using SIP, and regression equation of lumbar lordosis (LL) using PI or SIP were obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated as an evaluation of the measurement reliability.

Results

Reliability analysis showed high intra- and inter-rater agreements in all the spinopelvic parameters, with ICCs > 0.9. The SIP and pelvic inclination angle (PIA) demonstrated strong correlation with PI (R = 0.96) and pelvic tilt (PT) (R = 0.92). PI could be predicted according to the regression equation: PI = − 9.92 + 0.905 * SIP (R = 0.9596, p < 0.0001). The ideal LL could be predicted using the following equation using PI and age: ideal LL = 32.33 + 0.623 * PI – 0.280 * age (R = 0.6033, p < 0.001) and using SIP and age: ideal LL = 24.29 + 0.609 * SIP – 0.309 * age (R = 0.6177, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both SIP and PIA were reliable parameters for determining the morphology and orientation of the pelvis, respectively. Ideal LL was accurately predicted using the SIP with equal accuracy as the PI. Our findings will assist clinicians in the assessment of spinopelvic sagittal alignment.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000042979; January 13, 2021).

Different spinal subtypes with varying characteristics of lumbar disc degeneration at specific level with age: a study based on an asymptomatic population

Background

The relationship between spinal sagittal subtypes and lumbar disc degeneration is unclear. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relationship between lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration and age in asymptomatic healthy individuals with different sagittal alignments.

Methods

In this cross-sectional observational study, we examined 209 asymptomatic young and middle-aged volunteers (123 women and 86 men) who were divided into the following three groups according to age: groups A (20–30 years), B (31–40 years), and C (41–50 years). The volunteers underwent full-spine standing lateral radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 3.0 T) of the lumbar spine. Based on panoramic radiography, two observers measured the spinopelvic parameters and classified the spine into Roussouly subtypes. The degree of disc degeneration was assessed based on T2-weighted images according to the Pfirrmann classification.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in the degree of degeneration of type I spine between groups B and C at L4-L5 (P < 0.03) and L5-S1 (P < 0.01) and between groups A and C at L1-L2 (P < 0.04) and L4-L5 (P < 0.01). The degeneration degree of type II spine at all levels were significantly different between groups A and C. No statistically significant difference was found between groups A and B in all subtypes except for type II spine at L1-L2 (P < 0.04). A significant difference was found at four levels between groups B and C in type III spine (P < 0.05) and between groups A and C. For type IV spine, there was a significant difference in the degree of degeneration at L4-L5 (P < 0.02) between groups A and C. Moreover, almost all single parameters were not strongly correlated with the degree of disc degeneration.

Conclusion

The different spinal subtypes have characteristics of lumbar disc degeneration at specific levels with age. We considered that spinal classification could be used as a predictor of lumbar disc degeneration. Our data may be helpful to increase awareness of the relationship between spinal subtypes and lumbar disc degeneration.

Level of evidence

3

What does the shape of our back tell us? Correlation between sacrum orientation and lumbar lordosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis (LL) have been studied extensively in recent years via X-ray examinations and strongly correlate with each other. This raises, first, the question of the reproducibility of this correlation in multiple standing phases and, second, if this correlation can be achieved using non-radiological measurement tools.

PURPOSE

This study aimed (1) to determine the extent to which the back-shape measurements correspond to the correlations between the sacral slope and LL found in previous radiological investigations, (2) to identify a possible effect of age and gender on this correlation, and (3) to evaluate the extent to which this correlation is affected by repeated standing phases.

STUDY DESIGN/SAMPLE

This is an observational cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 410 asymptomatic subjects (non-athletes), 21 asymptomatic soccer players (athletes), and 176 patients with low back pain (LBP) were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The correlation between sacrum orientation (SO) and LL was determined in six repetitive upright standing postures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A non-invasive strain-gauge based measuring system was used.

RESULTS

Back-shape measurements yielded a similar correlation to that measured in previous X-ray examinations. The coefficient of determination (R²) between SO and LL ranged between 0.76 and 0.79 for the asymptomatic cohort. Athletes showed the strongest correlation (0.76≤R²≤0.84). For patients with LBP, the correlation substantially decreased (0.18≤R²≤0.39). R² was not strongly affected by repeated standing phases.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between SO and LL can be assessed by surface measurements of the back shape and is not influenced by natural variations in the standing posture.

Grayscale inversion radiographic view provided improved intra- and inter-observer reliabilities in measuring spinopelvic parameters in asymptomatic adult population

Background

Recently, a grayscale inversion view was reported to improve intra- and inter-observer reliabilities in measuring coronal curvature with Cobb and pedicle methods in scoliosis patients. However, the grayscale transformation has never been applied to the measurements of spinopelvic parameters. The purpose of this study was to compare the measurement reliabilities of the spinoplevic sagittal parameters between the ‘Standard View’ and the ‘Grayscale Inversion View’ in normal adult populations.

Methods

A total of 30 asymptomatic subjects aged between 30 and 40 years were included in this study. Whole-spine posteroanterior radiographs were used to measure the spinoplevic sagittal parameters including thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT) in both standard view and grayscale inversion view. Two independent observers measured the parameters twice at a 2-week interval. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were compared between the two radiographic views. The absolute differences between the two sets of measurements on each view were calculated and compared.

Results

The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of PI, PT and SVA were greater in the grayscale inversion view than in the standard view (0.972 vs 0.817, 0.937 vs 0.833 and 0.964 vs 0.901 for observer 1, respectively; 0.990 vs 0.826, 0.995 vs 0.842 and 0.969 vs 0.919 for observer 2, respectively). Overall, the improvement of ICC was greater in parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment than in those of sagittal spinal alignment. As for the mean absolute differences between two measurements, significant differences existed between the two views in terms of PI, PT and SVA (p = 0.014, 0.016 and 0.011 for observer 1, respectively; p = 0.014, 0.025 and 0.046 for observer 2, respectively).

Conclusions

A grayscale inversion view provided improved intra- and inter-observer reliabilities in measuring spinoplevic alignment when compared with a standard view. This view was more useful in subjects whose pelvic anatomical structures can’t be identified clearly on the standard X-ray view.

Reliability of a new method for measuring coronal trunk imbalance, the axis-line-angle technique

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Accurate determination of the extent of trunk imbalance in the coronal plane plays a key role in an evaluation of patients with trunk imbalance, such as patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. An established, widely used practice in evaluating trunk imbalance is to drop a plumb line from the C7 vertebra to a key reference axis, the central sacral vertical line (CSVL) in full-spine standing anterioposterior radiographs, and measuring the distance between them, the C7-CSVL. However, measuring the CSVL is subject to intraobserver differences, is error-prone, and is of poor reliability. Therefore, the development of a different way to measure trunk imbalance is needed.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to describe a new method to measure coronal trunk imbalance, the axis-line-angle technique (ALAT), which measures the angle at the intersection between the C7 plumb line and an axis line drawn from the vertebral centroid of the C7 to the middle of the superior border of the symphysis pubis, and to compare the reliability of the ALAT with that of the C7-CSVL.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A prospective study at a university hospital was used.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample consisted of sixty-nine consecutively enrolled men and women patients, aged 10-18 years, who had trunk imbalance defined as C7-CSVL longer than 20 mm on computed full-spine standing anterioposterior radiographs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data were analyzed to determine the correlation between C7-CSVL and ALAT measurements and to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities.

METHODS

Using a picture archiving and communication system, three radiologists independently evaluated trunk imbalance on the 69 computed radiographs by measuring the C7-CSVL and by measuring the angle determined by the ALAT. Data were analyzed to determine the correlations between the two measures of trunk imbalance, and to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of each of them.

RESULTS

Overall results from the measurements by the C7-CSVL and the ALAT were significantly moderately correlated. Intraobserver assessments by measuring the C7-CSVL and by doing the ALAT failed to find any significant differences between the findings from the first and second assessments by the same radiologist. Interobserver assessments significantly differed between radiologists 1 and 2 for the first assessment measuring the C7-CSVL, and between radiologists 2 and 3 for the second assessment measuring the C7-CSVL. Interobserver assessments by doing the ALAT failed to find any significant differences among the three radiologists for either of the two assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that using the ALAT, which is simple and convenient, is of great value in measuring trunk imbalance. For measuring trunk imbalance, the ALAT has essential advantages compared with measuring the C7-CSVL. We encourage spine surgeons to consider using the ALAT in evaluating trunk imbalance.