Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch predisposes to adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion

Impact of iatrogenic alterations on adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and disease (ASDis) remain significant challenges following lumbar spinal fusion surgery, with reported incidences of 36% for ASDeg and 11% for ASDis within two to seven years post-operation. However, the mechanisms leading to the development of ASDeg are still poorly understood. This comprehensive review aims to elucidate the multifactorial etiology of ASDeg by examining important iatrogenic alterations associated with spinal fusion.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify clinical studies quantifying the occurrence of ASDeg and ASDis after lumbar fusion surgery. An EMBASE and citation search up to April 2023 yielded 378 articles. Data extracted encompassed study design, fusion type, sample size, patient age, and incidence of ASDeg and ASDis. A total of 87 publications were analyzed in the context of iatrogenic alterations caused by surgical access (muscle damage, ligament damage, facet joint damage) and instrumentation (fusion angle, immobilization).

RESULTS

Ligament damage emerged as the most impactful iatrogenic factor promoting ASDeg and ASDis development. Similarly, muscle damage had a significant impact on long-term musculoskeletal health, with muscle-sparing approaches potentially reducing ASDis rates. Immobilization led to compensatory increased motion at adjacent segments; however, the causal link to degeneration remains inconclusive. Fusion angle showed low evidence for a strong impact due to inconsistent findings across studies. Facet joint violations were likely contributing factors but not primary initiators of ASDeg.

CONCLUSION

Based on the analyzed literature, ligament and muscle damage are the most impactful iatrogenic factors contributing to ASDeg and ASDis development. Minimally invasive techniques, careful retractor placement, and ligament-preserving decompression may help mitigate these effects by reducing undue muscle and ligament trauma. Although it is not possible to definitively advocate for one or more techniques, the principle of selecting the most tissue-sparing approach needs to be scaled across surgical planning and execution. Further research is necessary to fully elucidate these mechanisms and inform surgical practices to mitigate ASDeg risk.

Sarcopenia Predicts Early Adjacent Segment Disease Development After Anterior and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sarcopenia has recently been shown to increase risk of early adjacent segment disease (ASD) development after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. We sought to evaluate whether sarcopenia increases risk of ASD after retroperitoneal approaches for lumbar interbody fusion (eg, anterior lumbar interbody fusion or oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion).

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 104 adult patients aged older than 18 years who underwent short-segment fusion through anterior lumbar interbody fusion or oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion approach from 2013 to 2023. The primary outcome was development of ASD within 3 years of surgery. Patients who had prior surgery for ASD, underwent long-construct deformity correction, had an ongoing oncological process, or lacked sufficient follow-up were excluded. Psoas and vertebral body volumetric measurements were calculated at the L4 pedicle level using preoperative MRI. Spinopelvic parameters of pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL mismatch were recorded from standing upright radiographs. Odds ratios were calculated with logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients undergoing fusion through retroperitoneal approaches, 25 (24.04%) developed ASD within 3 years. Patient demographics and medical comorbidities did not predict early ASD. Left and right psoas area (cm2) and psoas:vertebral body ratio strongly predicted ASD development (P < .0001). Nineteen patients were categorized as sarcopenic, defined as bilateral psoas:vertebral body ratios >1 SD below the study population gender mean. 16 of the 19 sarcopenic patients developed ASD within 3 years, compared with 9 of the 85 nonsarcopenic patients (84.21% vs 10.59%, P < .0001). Postoperative pelvic tilt and PI-LL mismatch were predictive of ASD on univariate but not multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia significantly predicts ASD development within 3 years after lumbar fusion through retroperitoneal approaches. Irrespective of approach, sarcopenia is a risk factor of ASD formation and should be evaluated preoperatively. Morphometric analysis provides a simple screening tool and can be used to tailor preoperative and postoperative therapies to improve outcomes.

Impact of spinal alignment on adjacent segment disease and degeneration after short-segment lumbosacral fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adjacent segment disease (ASDis) and degeneration (ASDeg) are common complications following lumbar fusion, ranging from asymptomatic radiographic changes to debilitating symptoms requiring revision surgery. While the impact of spinopelvic alignment (SPA) on postoperative outcomes and ASDis prevention is well-studied in long-construct fusions, its role in short-segment lumbosacral fusions, particularly over the long term, remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association between global and distal lumbar SPA with the development of ASDis and ASDeg in the long-term follow-up of patients undergoing short-segment lumbosacral fusion. Secondary outcomes were patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in relation to adjacent segment changes.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective single-center cohort study with minimum follow-up of 5 years.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 86 patients who underwent L4-S1 spinal fusion between 2003 and 2015, with a mean follow-up of 12±4 years.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the development of adjacent segment changes, classified into 2 groups: (1) surgically-treated ASDis, and (2) ASDeg, defined as radiographic evidence of adjacent segment changes without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included PROMs: the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D5L).

METHODS

Pre- and postoperative standing radiographs were annotated and the following global lumbar SPA parameters analyzed: Pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL-mismatch, lumbar pelvic angle (LPA). Additionally, the following distal lumbar SPA parameters were analyzed: Distal lordosis (DL) between L4-S1, lordosis distribution index (LDI=DL/LL), PI-DL-difference, DL-PI-ratio, adjacent segment lordosis (ASL). Postoperative ODI and EQ5D5L were assessed via a telephone interview.

RESULTS

Among 86 patients with a mean follow-up of 12±4 years the incidence of ASDis was 27.9% (n=24), while 7.0% (n=6) showed ASDeg. No significant differences in pre- and postoperative global lumbar SPA were found in patients who developed ASDis or ASDeg compared to patients who did not. PI (53.6° vs. 59.6°) and preoperative SS (34.9° vs. 40.3°) trended to be lower in the ASDis group compared to controls, although non-significant. Pre- and postoperative distal lumbar SPA parameters did not differ between groups. Patients with adjacent segment changes, regardless of whether they underwent revision surgery, reported worse PROMs. ODI scores were elevated in both the ASDis group (28, IQR 15-42) and the ASDeg group (34, IQR 14-47) compared to controls (10, IQR 2-24; p=.005). EQ5D5L scores were lower in both the ASDis (70, IQR 53-83) and the ASDeg groups (60, IQR 55-85) compared to controls (85, IQR 75-90; p=.025).

CONCLUSION

In this long-term follow-up study of patients undergoing short-segment lumbosacral fusion, neither preoperative nor postoperative SPA was significantly associated with the development of ASDis or ASDeg. These findings suggest that other factors may have a greater influence on ASDis risk. Patients who developed adjacent segment changes, whether or not they required revision surgery, experienced worse long-term postoperative PROMs, indicating the importance of ASDis prevention.

Analyzing the L4-5 Segmental Alignment Change of Two Minimally Invasive Prone-Based Interbody Fusions

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveRestoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) is a principal objective during spinal fusion procedures, traditionally focusing on achieving an LL within 10° of the pelvic incidence (PI). Recent studies have demonstrated a relatively constant L4-S1 alignment of 35-40° at L4-S1 and at least 15° at L4-5, regardless of PI. Based on these results, this study was created to examine the success rate of achieving a minimum of 15° at L4-5 through two differing prone-based techniques: Prone Lateral (pLLIF) and Trans Foraminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF).MethodsOne hundred patients with a primary single-level L4-5 interbody fusion (50 pLLIF and 50 TLIF) were retrospectively analyzed. Pre and post-operative radiographs were measured to examine the segmental change at each level in the lumbar spine and calculate the success rate for achieving a minimum L4-5 segmental lordosis of 15° at the final follow-up.ResultsThe overall success rate of achieving an L4-5 segmental alignment >15° at the final follow-up was 70%. Prone LLIF was significantly more likely than TLIF to achieve this goal, achieving L4-5 > 15° 84% of the time vs TLIFs 56% (P = 0.002). Prone LLIF demonstrated an average L4-5 increase of 5.6 ± 5.9° which was larger than the mean increase for TLIF 0.4 ± 3.8° (P < 0.001). In both techniques, there was an inverse correlation between pre-operative L4-5 angle and L4-5 angle change.ConclusionProne lateral lumbar interbody fusion demonstrates a high success rate for achieving a post-operative L4-5 angle >15° and achieves this at a higher rate than TLIF.

Iatrogenic posterior translation of the construct at the uppermost instrumented vertebrae is associated with proximal junctional kyphosis

PURPOSE

To determine if iatrogenic posterior translation (UIV SPi) at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) is associated with increased mechanical complications and secondarily to generate and validate a UIV SPi threshold for increased complications.

METHODS

Two patient databases were utilized: one for generating a UIV SPi threshold and another for validation. Patients with a UIV between T8-L1 and a LIV at ilium were included. A receiver operating curve (ROC) curve analyses was performed to generate a threshold that predicted proximal junctional complications. This UIV SPi angle (-16.0°) was rounded to -15.0° for practical clinical use and validated in a separate cohort. Patients were stratified as above (most translated, MT) or below (least translated, LT) the threshold for comparative demographic and outcomes analyses.

RESULTS

Generation of the threshold on 192 patients (122 LT, 70 MT) revealed that the MT group had higher absolute postoperative UIV SVA (MT=-56.1 ± 23.1 mm vs. LT=-10.4 ± 31.8 mm, p < 0.001), higher PT (25.7° vs. 19.3°, p < 0.001), and 2.8-5.8 times greater odds of postoperative proximal junctional complications at 2-years (p < 0.05). Validation on 135 patients (95 LT, 40 MT) revealed that the MT group had 11.7 times greater odds of radiographic PJK and had 4.5 times greater odds of all-cause reoperations (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with UIV posterior translation, despite similar PI-LL and T1PA, exhibit a high PT and experience higher odds of proximal junctional complications. Our findings support limiting the UIV SPi to < 15° of posterior translation to mitigate postoperative mechanical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Long-Term Risk of Adjacent-Segment Disease in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treated with Posterior Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Posterior interbody fusion can be associated with adjacent-segment disease (ASD) some years after surgery. The aim of this study is to confirm the rate of ASD in isthmic spondylolisthesis treated by posterior fusion.

METHODS

The records of patients treated by posterior lumbar fusion between January 2014 and June 2022 were collected. Inclusion criteria encompassed adults diagnosed with isthmic spondylolisthesis and available preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiologic images.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients included in the study, the majority were female (53.6%) with a mean age of 48.5 years. In 111 (79.3%) patients the spondylolisthesis was located at L5-S1; in 20 (14.3%) patients at L4-L5; 5 (3.6%) cases presented the defect at L4-L5-S1, and in 4 (2.8%) cases at L3-L4. In 75 (53.6%) patients, the listhesis was classified as grade I (Meyerding); in 50 (35.7%) cases as grade II; in 12 (8.6%) cases as grade III; and in 3 (2.1%) cases as grade IV. The average follow-up of this study was 67 (10-111) months. Two cases (1.43%, 95% confidence interval 0.17%-5.07%) of ASD were observed. Evaluations of clinical symptoms revealed a notable reduction in the average Numeric Rating Scale score from 8 to 1.9 at the last follow-up. Postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch <10 correlating with a favorable outcome (Numerical Rating Scale ≤3).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms data already present in the literature regarding the low incidence of ASD in patients who underwent surgery for isthmic spondylolisthesis. The posterior approach seems to remain a safe and effective technique in these patients.

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis; slippage reduction can be a risk factor for adjacent segment disease

PURPOSE

Several risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) have been reported. High pelvic incidence (PI) has been identified as risk factors for L4 anterior slip in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Correcting the slip with L4-L5 fixation merely restores the lumbar alignment, but the PI itself remains unchanged. We hypothesized that the fused L4 vertebral body might continue to be subject to the slip-inducing force, even after fixation, and that slip correction might be a cause of ASD. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk factors for adjacent ASD following single-segment PLIF in patients with L4 spondylolisthesis, with a particular focus on the reduction of vertebral body slippage.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion at the L4-L5 level for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis were investigated. Patients were divided into two groups: the ASD group (n = 12) and the non-ASD group (n = 40). %Slip before surgery and at follow-up, Δ%Slip (Δ%Slip = %Slip before surgery-%Slip at follow-up), L4-L5 interbody height, and L4-L5 lordosis angle were evaluated.

RESULTS

Stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed Δ%Slip to be a risk factor for ASD (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.43, p = 0.015). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff value for Δ%Slip was 7.3% (sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 67.5%, and area under the curve = 0.725).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the reduction of L4 slippage may contribute to the development of ASD in patients with L4 spondylolisthesis.

How to prevent preoperative adjacent segment degeneration L5/S1 segment occuring postoperative adjacent segment disease? A retrospective study of risk factor analysis

OBJECTIVE

L5/S1 segment is one of the most common lumbar degenerative segments with high clinical failure rate. When the clinically responsible segment consists of one or more segments including L4/L5 segment, whether to merge the severely degraded L5/S1 segment together is a common problem plaguing clinicians. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors for preoperative adjacent segment degeneration L5/S1 segment occuring Postoperative adjacent segment disease(ASDis), analyze the correlation between the high risk factors and the occurrence of adjacent segment disease, clarify the preventive measures and direction, and provide references for clinical selection of personalized treatment.

METHODS

The data of 119 patients with L5/S1 segment degeneration who underwent fixed to L4/5 posterior lumbar fusion surgery and were followed up in the orthopedic ward of Shandong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the occurrence of ASDis at the last follow-up, all patients were divided into ASDis group (17 cases) and asymptomatic group (102 cases). The age, gender, BMI, bone mineral density and underlying diseases of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Perioperative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, number of surgical fusion segments, postoperative time on the ground, and hospital stay were recorded and compared. The improvement of VAS score and ODI index before and after operation were recorded and compared. X-ray and CT measurements were used to compare preoperative L5/S1 intervertebral space height, endplate Modic changes, gas in articular process, disc herniation calcification, sacral vertebrae lumbalization of patients, intraoperative L4/5 immediately corrected intervertebral space height, and sagittal position parameters of L5/S1 segment Segmental lordosis (SL), Pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS),lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL and so on. Pfirmann grade, paravertebral muscle CSA, fat infiltration FI, paravertebral muscle rFCSA, psoas major CSA, and vertebral body area were measured and compared by MRI before surgery. The relative paravertebral cross-sectional area (rCSA), relative psoas major cross-sectional area (rCSA) and relative functional paravertebral cross-sectional area (rFCSA) were calculated. logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for preoperative adjacent segment degeneration L5/S1 segment occuring Postoperative ASDis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was described and the area under the curve was calculated.

RESULTS

All patients successfully completed the operation. Proportion of patients with osteoporosis combined with ASDis [yes/no, (9/8) vs. (21/81), P = 0.004], BMI [(27.55 ± 3.99) vs. (25.18 ± 3.83), P = 0.021], the number of fusion segments [(1.76 ± 0.75) vs. (1.28 ± 0.52), P = 0.020], the correction height of L4/5 intervertebral space [(2.71 ± 1.21) mm vs. (2.10 ± 1.10) mm, P = 0.037] were significantly higher than those in asymptomatic group. Bone mineral density T value in ASDis group [(-1.54 ± 1.68) g/cm2 vs. (-0.01 ± 2.02) g/cm2, P = 0.004] was significantly lower than that in asymptomatic group. There were no significant differences in operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss and walking time between the two groups (P > 0.05). Preoperative imaging: In ASDis group, paravertebral muscle CSA [(4478.37.3 ± 727.54) mm vs. (4989.47 ± 915.98) mm, P = 0.031], paravertebral muscle rCSA [(3.14 ± 0.82) vs. (3.87 ± 0.89), P = 0.002], paravertebral muscle rFCSA [(2.37 ± 0.68) vs. (2.96 ± 0.77), P = 0.003] were significantly lower than those in non-sedimentation group. Endplate Modic changes (I/II/III/ no, (3/5/4/7) vs (23/16/5/56), P = 0.048) and vertebral canal morphological classification (0/1/2 grade, (7/5/5) vs (69/25/8), P = 0.019) in ASDis group were significantly different from those in asymptomatic group. The proportion of patients with gas in L5/S1 segment in ASDis group [yes/no, (6/11) vs. (13/89), P = 0.019] was significantly higher than that in asymptomatic group. ASDis group of preoperative LL Angle [(34.10 + 13.83)° vs. (41.75 + 13.38) °, P = 0.032) and SL Angle [(15.83 + 5.07) vs. (22.77 + 4.68) °, P = 0.022],2 days after surgery LL Angle [(38.11 + 11.73) vs. (43.70 + 10.02) °, P = 0.038) and SL Angle [(15.75 + 3.92) vs. (19.82 + 5.46) °, P = 0.004), at the time of the last follow-up LL Angle [(37.19 + 11.99) vs. (43.70 + 11.34) °, P = 0.032) and SL Angle [(13.50 + 3.27) vs. (16.00 + 4.78) °, P = 0.041) were significantly less than the asymptomatic group. Postoperative imaging: There were no significant differences in the time of intervertebral bone fusion and the number of patients with failed internal fixation between the two groups (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, VAS score [(3.24 ± 1.39) vs. (1.63 ± 0.84), P < 0.001] and ODI score [(21.00 ± 9.90) vs. (15.79 ± 4.44), P = 0.048] in ASDis group were significantly higher than those in asymptomatic group. Bivariate logistic regression showed that BMI value (OR = 1.715, P = 0.001) and number of surgically fused segments (OR = 4.245, P = 0.030) were risk factors for preoperative adjacent segment degeneration L5/S1 segment occuring Postoperative ASDis. The degree of spinal stenosis grade 0 (OR = 0.028, P = 0.003), the paraverteal muscle rFCSA (OR = 0.346, P = 0.036), and the Angle of Postoperative L5/S1 segment SL (OR = 0.746, P = 0.007) were protective factors for preoperative adjacent segment degeneration L5/S1 segment occuring Postoperative ASDis. Under ROC curve, the area of Postoperative L5/S1 segment SL Angle was 0.703, the area of paravertebral muscle rFCSA was 0.716, the area of BMI was 0.721, and the area of number of fusion segments was 0.518.

CONCLUSION

Excessive number of surgical fusion segments, spinal canal stenosis greater than grade 0, excessive BMI, too small Postoperative L5/S1 segment SL Angle, and too small paravertal muscle rFCSA are risk factors for preoperative adjacent segment degeneration L5/S1 segment occuring Postoperative ASDis. Prevention should be focused on the above aspects to reduce the incidence of L5/S1 segment ASDis.

Influence of Frailty on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Analysis of a Controlled Cohort of 408 Patients

Background/Objectives: The concept of frailty has been recognized as an important issue which can influence postoperative outcomes. We aimed to investigate the influence of frailty on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spine disease. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 408 patients in whom 506 expandable interbody devices were implanted. The patients were grouped into vulnerable/frail versus well/fit according to the Canadian Frailty Index. Results: The frail patients were older and had a larger number of fused segments (3.0 vs. 2.4 segments, p = 0.009). In the univariate analysis, the frail patients were more likely to experience a postoperative adverse event (AE) until discharge (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.22-2.92; p = 0.004), three (OR 1.57, 1.07-2.3; p = 0.021), and 12 months postoperatively (OR 3.77, 1.96-7.24; p < 0.001). Following the multivariable logistic regression analysis, frailty remained an independent risk factor for postoperative AEs at 12 months (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.69-6.99; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Frailty negatively influenced the rate of AEs until 12 months, while the odds of having a favorable outcome at any time remained unaffected in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion with TLIF. Future efforts are needed to evaluate whether preoperative medical optimization or prehabilitation may positively impact patient outcomes.

Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Case-Series.

OBJECTIVES

Due to heterogeneity in previous studies, the effect of MI-TLIF on postoperative segmental lordosis (SL) and lumbar lordosis (LL) remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to identify radiographic factors associated with lordosis after surgery in a homogenous series of MI-TLIF patients.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review identified consecutive patients who underwent single-level MI-TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis from 2015-2020. All surgeries underwent unilateral facetectomies and a contralateral facet release with expandable interbody cages. PROs included the ODI and NRS-BP for low-back pain. Radiographic measures included SL, disc height, percent spondylolisthesis, cage positioning, LL, PI-LL mismatch, sacral-slope, and pelvic-tilt. Surgeries were considered "lordosing" if the change in postoperative SL was ≥ +4° and "kyphosing" if ≤ -4°. Predictors of change in SL/LL were evaluated using Pearson's correlation and multivariable regression.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients with an average follow-up of 22.5 (range 12-61) months were included. Patients experienced significant improvements in ODI (29% ± 22% improvement, P < .001) and NRS-BP (3.3 ± 3 point improvement, P < .001). There was a significant increase in mean SL (Δ3.43° ± 4.37°, P < .001) while LL (Δ0.17° ± 6.98°, P > .05) remained stable. Thirty-eight (52%) patients experienced lordosing MI-TLIFs, compared to 4 (5%) kyphosing and 31 (43%) neutral MI-TLIFs. A lower preoperative SL and more anterior cage placement were associated with the greatest improvement in SL (β = -.45° P = .001, β = 15.06° P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, the majority of patients experienced lordosing or neutral MI-TLIFs (n = 69, 95%). Preoperative radiographic alignment and anterior cage placement were significantly associated with target SL following MI-TLIF.

Analysis of Personalized Interbody Implants in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter cohort.

OBJECTIVES

A report from the International Spine Study Group (ISSG) noted that surgeons failed to achieve alignment goals in nearly two-thirds of 266 complex adult deformity surgery (CADS) cases. We assess whether personalized interbody spacers are associated with improved rates of achieving goal alignment following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

ASD patients were included if their surgery utilized 3D-printed personalized interbody spacer(s) and they met ISSG CADS inclusion criteria. Planned alignment was personalized by the surgeon during interbody planning. Planned vs achieved alignment was assessed and compared with the ISSG CADS series that used stock interbodies.

RESULTS

For 65 patients with personalized interbodies, 62% were women, mean age was 70.3 years (SD = 8.3), mean instrumented levels was 9.9 (SD = 4.1), and the mean number of personalized interbodies per patient was 2.2 (SD = .8). Segmental alignment was achieved close to plan for levels with personalized interbodies, with mean difference between goal and achieved as follows: intervertebral lordosis = .9° (SD = 5.2°), intervertebral coronal angle = .1° (SD = 4.7°), and posterior disc height = -0.1 mm (SD = 2.3 mm). Achieved pelvic incidence-to-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) correlated significantly with goal PI-LL (r = .668, P < .001). Compared with the ISSG CADS cohort, utilization of personalized interbodies resulted in significant improvement in achieving PI-LL <5° of plan (P = .046) and showed a significant reduction in cases with PI-LL >15° of plan (P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports use of personalized interbodies as a means of better achieving goal segmental sagittal and coronal alignment and significantly improving achievement of goal PI-LL compared with stock devices.

L3-L4 Hyperlordosis and Decreased Lower Lumbar Lordosis Following Short-Segment L4-L5 Lumbar Fusion Surgery is Associated With L3-L4 Revision Surgery for Adjacent Segment Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES

Reoperation at L3-L4 for adjacent segment disease (ASD) is common after L4-L5 spine fusion. L4-S1 lower lumbar lordosis (LLL) accounts for the majority of global lumbar lordosis (GLL) and is modifiable during surgery. We sought to determine if a reduction in LLL leads to an increase in L3-L4 focal lumbar lordosis (L3-L4 FLL) and resulting risk of ASD at L3-L4.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of a prospective cohort with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent L4-L5 or L4-L5-S1 fusion between 2006 and 2012. Radiographic parameters-GLL, LLL, L3-L4 FLL, upper lumbar lordosis, lordosis distribution index, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence-were extracted from preoperative and postoperative lumbar spine radiographs. Statistical comparisons were made between those who underwent revision for post-fusion adjacent level stenosis at L3-L4 (REVISION) and those who did not (NO REVISION).

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 104 patients. The REVISION cohort included 19 individuals. No significant differences in baseline demographics or operative details for the index procedure were found between groups. Postoperatively, when compared to the NO REVISION cohort, the REVISION cohort had a decrease in LLL (-2.6° vs + 1.5°, P = .011) and LDI (-5.1% vs + 1.3%, P = .039), and an increase in L3-L4 FLL (+2.6° vs -.6°, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in LLL and compensatory increase in L3-L4 FLL after initial lower lumbar fusion surgery resulted in more reoperation at L3-L4 for post-fusion adjacent level spinal stenosis.

Characterization of Lumbar Lordosis: Influence of Age, Sex, Vertebral Body Wedging, and L4-S1

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic review.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of the study were to determine the contributions to lumbar lordosis (LL) through both the vertebrae and the intervertebral disc (IVD), and to investigate the relationships between lumbar sagittal spine measurements and age and gender.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A small body of literature exists on the relative contributions of vertebral body and IVD morphology to LL, the effects of L4-S1 on overall LL, and the relationships/correlations between lumbar sagittal spine measurements.

METHODS

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively evaluated. Measurements included LL, pelvic incidence (PI), and % contributions of vertebral body wedging/IVD wedging/L4-S1 to LL. Patients were separated into groups by age and sex, demographic data were collected, and statistical analysis was completed.

RESULTS

LL decreased with age, although PI remained similar. Females demonstrated increased LL and vertebral body wedging % than males. Males demonstrated increased L4-S1% than females. Despite a decrease in LL with age, patients maintained L4-S1% and IVD wedging %. There was a significant negative relationship between PI and IVD wedging, PI and L4-S1%, and LL and L4-S1%.

CONCLUSIONS

During aging, the lumbar spine loses LL linearly. This occurs in the IVD and vertebral bodies. Females have increased LL compared with males, because of an increase in vertebral body wedging and IVD/vertebral wedging cranial to L4. In patients with high PI or LL, increased LL occurs from cranial to L4 and from vertebral body wedging.

Risk Factors of Proximal Junctional Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify surgical, patient-specific, and radiographic risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF), a complex complication following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The literature on the risk factors for PJF after ASD surgery was included. The study patients were diagnosed with ASD and underwent surgery for ASD. PJF is defined as the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis, accompanied by one or more of the following characteristics: a fracture of the vertebral body at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV + 1 level, disruption of the posterior ligaments, or dislodgement of the instrumentation at the UIV. proximal junctional kyphosis, on the other hand, is determined by 2 criteria: a proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle 1) of 10° and 2) at least 10° greater than the preoperative value.

RESULTS

Our pooled analysis of 11 unique studies (2037 patients) revealed significant differences in several preoperative and postoperative measures between PJF and non-PJF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In ASD patients, the presence of concurrent osteoporosis or paravertebral muscle wasting significantly increases the risk of developing PJF. The use of bicortical screws, UIV screw angle exceeding 1°, and positioning the UIV in the lower thoracic or lumbar region also further elevate this risk. Lower preoperative SS, higher preoperative PI-LL, higher preoperative pelvic tilt, higher preoperative SVA, higher postoperative LL, and a greater change in LL characterize patients with PJF.

Distal Lumbar Lordosis is Associated With Reoperation for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Conditions

STUDY DESIGN

A single centre retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have suggested that distal lordosis (L4-S1, DL) remains constant across all pelvic incidence (PI) subgroups, whilst proximal lordosis (L1-L4, PL) varies. We sought to investigate the impact of post-operative DL on adjacent segment disease (ASD) requiring reoperation in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions.

METHODS

Patients undergoing 1-3 level lumbar fusion with the two senior authors between 2007-16 were included. Demographic and radiographic data were recorded. Univariate, multivariate binary logistic regression, and Kaplan Meier survivorship analyses were performed.

RESULTS

335 patients were included in the final analysis. Most had single (67%) or two (31%) level fusions. The mean follow-up was 64-month. Fifty-seven patients (17%) underwent reoperation for ASD at an average of 78-month post-operatively (R group). The R group had a significantly lower mean post-operative DL (27.3 vs 31.1 deg, P < .001) and mean PI (55.5 vs 59.2 deg, P < .05). On univariate analysis, patients with a post-operative DL of <35 deg had higher odds of reoperation for ASD than those with a post-operative DL of ≥35 deg (OR 2.7, P = .016). In the multivariate model, post-operative DL, low/average PI, and spondylolisthesis were all significantly associated with reoperation for ASD.

CONCLUSION

This study provides preliminary support to an association between post-operative distal lumbar lordosis and risk of reoperation for ASD in patients undergoing fusions for degenerative conditions. Further multicentre prospective study is needed to independently confirm this association and identify the impact of restoration of physiological distal lumbar lordosis on long term patient outcomes.

Segmental Lordosis Restoration During Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Fusion: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

The science of spinal alignment has progressed rapidly since Jean Doubousset described the cone of economy in the 1970s. It is now clearly established that global and regional spinal alignment are associated with improved patient-reported outcome and rates of success of lumbar spinal fusion. Evidence has now emerged that segmental level-by-level alignment is also associated with positive patient outcomes. As such, restoring sagittal alignment matched to spinopelvic morphology during degenerative lumbar surgery can optimize surgical outcomes by preventing adjacent segment pathology. This review focuses on the vital importance of spinal alignment in different spinal conditions, provides a guide for measurement of spinopelvic parameters, and outlines literature regarding lumbar restoration in degenerative spinal fusion.

Lateral Anterior Column Release in Short Lumbar Fusion… Is It Worth It?

BACKGROUND

Radiographic adjacent segment disease (ASD) ranges from 10% to 84%, depending on technique. Occurrence of symptomatic ASD is lower, with a range of 1.9% to 13%. ASD can be very debilitating and necessitate further procedures, leading to high morbidity. Herein, we explore the occurrence of adjacent segment disease when performing anterior column release in lateral interbody fusion.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, 120 total patients who underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at our facility from 2013 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, allowing for a minimum of 3 years for follow-up time. Surgical variables and spinopelvic parameters were measured and collected by our team. Statistical measures of significance were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty total patients were included. 73.3% of patients had percutaneous screws, and 11.7% had open. Thirteen patients underwent LLIF with anterior column release (ACR). The mean lumbar lordosis (LL) was 50.1 ± 12.9, pelvic incidence (PI) was 52.8 ± 11.2, sacral slope was 33.6 ± 9.2, pelvic tilt was 18.1 ± 6.8, and sagittal vertical axis was 6.8 mm ± 30.5.Twenty four total patients had ASD after LLIF. In univariable analysis, ACR (P < 0.001) and PI-LL Mismatch (P < 0.035) were risk factors for developing ASD. In multivariable analysis, greater PI-LL mismatch was predictive of ASD (P < 0.005, OR = 1.097, and 95% confidence interval = 1.029-1.171), as was ACR (P < 0.001, OR = 9.667, and 95% confidence interval = 2.669-35.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher PI-LL mismatch after lumbar interbody fusion, and performance of an ACR during LLIF increased the likelihood of developing symptomatic ASD in our patients. Considering ACR to achieve the goal of correcting spinopelvic parameters should be carefully evaluated when undertaking a lateral approach.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of adjacent segment disease after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common and serious complication that can develop in the mid- to long-term after lumbar fusion surgery. However, the underlying mechanisms of ASD are not yet fully understood. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for ASD in patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.

METHODS

Patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent TLIF between January 2015 and December 2016 were included in the retrospective study. The participants were divided into two groups: ASD and non-ASD. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors influencing ASD after TLIF surgery. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's discrimination, calibration and clinical value, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 11.5% (59/513) of patients developed ASD. Higher BMI, lower BMD, higher disc grade, and reduced disc height were identified as independent risk factors for ASD after TLIF. The model demonstrated good discrimination in both the training and validation sets, with calibration and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests confirming accuracy, and DCA demonstrating clinical applicability.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram model demonstrated promise in predicting ASD in patients who underwent TLIF, aiding clinicians in selecting the most suitable surgical approach and optimizing surgical decisions.

Lumbar Apex Position as an Independent Risk Factor for Adjacent Segment Diseases in Patients Undergoing Short-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether lumbar apex position had an impact on the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have demonstrated that solely concentrating on lumbar lordosis value is not suitable, and neglecting the significance of lumbar apex can lead to mechanical complications. However, the relationship between lumbar apex and ASD is still not well understood.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 234 consecutive patients who underwent L3-5 or L4-5 TLIF for degenerative diseases were reviewed. The study evaluated the associations between sagittal parameters and pelvic incidence (PI). Patients were labeled "matched" when lumbar apex position aligned with the theoretical target, and "mismatched" when it did not. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the independent risk factors of ASD. In addition, a focused subanalysis was performed based on the lumbar apex position (ideal match, cranial from ideal, and caudal from ideal).

RESULTS

After an average follow-up period of 70.6 months, 68 cases were identified as having ASD. Postoperatively, 64.7% (44 of 68) of the patients with ASD exhibited a mismatched lumbar apex, compared with 41% (68 of 166) of those without ASD ( P < 0.001). PI correlated significantly with proximal lordosis (PL) and lordosis distribution index (LDI) but not with distal lordosis (DL). Multivariate analysis identified age, L3-5 fusion, postoperative DL, and postoperative mismatched lumbar apex as independent risk factors of ASD. Upon the subanalysis, it was discovered that there were unique compensatory strategies in the cranial and caudal groups, with notable variations in postoperative DL, PL, and LDI among three groups (all P value of <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lumbar apex position significantly influenced the risk of ASD. To restore the lumbar apex to its ideal position, a proper value and distribution of DL should be attained.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch Is Not Associated with Early Reoperation for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To compare the 2-year reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease between patients with pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch postoperatively and patients with normal PI-LL measurements.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Spinopelvic radiographic parameters immediately postoperation were measured, and PI-LL mismatch was determined using the age-adjusted thresholds defined in Lafage et al. After propensity score matching, early reoperation rates were compared between the PI-LL mismatch and normal PI-LL cohorts. Early reoperation was defined as symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) requiring reoperation within 2 years of the index surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 219 patients were identified. The average age was 59 years of age, with 59.8% female. The PI-LL mismatch cohort (n = 148) was younger (57.5 vs. 63.5 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of Black patients (31.8% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.001) than the normal PI-LL cohort, respectively. A total of 100 patients in the PI-LL mismatch cohort were propensity score matched to 66 patients in the normal PI-LL cohort, resulting in no difference in age (P = 0.177), sex (P = 0.302), race (P = 0.727), or body mass index (P = 0.892). Using these matched cohorts, the rate of early reoperation for ASD was 8.0% in the PI-LL mismatch cohort and 9.1% in the normal PI-LL cohort (P = 0.805), with a mean time to reoperation of 1.28 and 1.33 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

After propensity score matching, PI-LL mismatch was not associated with early reoperation for ASD in patients undergoing 1- to 2-level lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions.

Sarcopenia Predicts the Development of Early Adjacent Segment Disease After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Predicting the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar spine fusion would help guide preoperative and postoperative therapies to prevent reoperation. We sought to evaluate whether sarcopenia predicts the development of early ASD after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 109 patients who underwent TLIF from 2013 to 2023. Patients older than 18 years who underwent elective posterior midline approach TLIF were included. Patients with prior lumbar instrumented fusions, cases of trauma, central nervous system infection, cancer, or long-construct thoracolumbar deformity corrections and those who lacked sufficient follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was radiographic ASD development within 3 years of surgery. Psoas volumetric measurements were recorded from the most recent preoperative MRI. Odds ratios were calculated with logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In 109 patients undergoing elective TLIF, 22 (20.2%) developed ASD within 3 years. Gender, body mass index, and extent of surgery were not associated with ASD development. Multivariate analysis showed left/right psoas cross-sectional area, and psoas:vertebral body ratio (P:VBR) predicted early ASD (P < .0001). Sarcopenia was further categorized as having bilateral P:VBR ≥1 SD below gender mean (T-score -1). Of 18 sarcopenic patients, 15 developed early ASD (83.33%) vs 7 of 91 nonsarcopenic patients (7.69%; P < .0001). Postoperative mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis was predictive of ASD on univariate (P = .0480) but not multivariate analysis. Pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis postoperatively were not associated with early ASD.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia, measured by decreased psoas area and P:VBR, predicts ASD formation within 3 years of surgery. Morphometric analysis of psoas size is a simple tool to identify patients at risk of developing ASD. This information can potentially guide preoperative and postoperative therapies, affect surgical decision making, and effectively counsel patients on risks of reoperation.

Risk factors and clinical significance of posterior slip of the proximal vertebral body after lower lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) after fusion surgery is frequently manifests as a cranial segment instability, disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis, spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis. The risk factors and mechanisms of ASD have been widely discussed but never clearly defined.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors and clinical significance of retrograde movement of the proximal vertebral body after lower lumbar fusion.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery between September 2015 and July 2021 and who were followed up for more than 2 years. Ninety-one patients with degenerative lumbar diseases were included (22 males and 69 females), with an average age of 52.3 years (40-73 years). According to whether there was retrograde movement of the adjacent vertebral body on postoperative X-rays, the patients were divided into retrograde and nonretrograde groups. The sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis were evaluated before surgery, after surgery, and at the final follow-up. At the same time, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the patients' quality of life.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (20.9%) who experienced retrograde movement of proximal adjacent segments were included in this study. The pelvic incidence (PI) of the patients in the retrograde group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the nonretrograde group before surgery, after surgery and at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in lumbar lordosis (LL) between the two groups before the operation, but LL in the retrograde group was significantly greater than that in the nonretrograde group postoperatively and at the final follow-up. No significant differences were detected in terms of the |PI-LL|, and there was no significant difference in the preoperative lordosis distribution index (LDI) between the two groups. The LDIs of the retrograde group were 68.1% ± 11.5% and 67.2% ± 11.9%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of the nonretrograde group (75.7% ± 10.4% and 74.3% ± 9.4%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Moreover, the patients in the retrograde group had a greater incidence of a LDI < 50% than those in the nonretrograde group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the ODI or VAS scores between the two groups before the operation, but the ODI and VAS scores in the retrograde group were significantly worse than those in the nonretrograde group after the operation and at the last follow-up, (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of posterior slippage after lower lumbar fusion was approximately 20.9%. The risk factors are related to a higher PI and distribution of lumbar lordosis. When a patient has a high PI and insufficient reconstruction of the lower lumbar spine, adjacent segment compensation via posterior vertebral body slippage is one of the factors that significantly affects surgical outcomes.

Restoring L4-S1 Lordosis Shape in Severe Sagittal Deformity: Impact of Correction Techniques on Alignment and Complication Profile

BACKGROUND

Severe sagittal plane deformity with loss of L4-S1 lordosis is disabling and can be improved through various surgical techniques. However, data are limited on the differing ability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) to achieve alignment goals in severely malaligned patients.

METHODS

Severe adult spinal deformity patients with preoperative PI-LL >20°, L4-S1 lordosis <30°, and full body radiographs and PROMs at baseline and 6-week postoperative visit were included. Patients were grouped into ALIF (1-2 level ALIF at L4-S1), PSO (L4/L5 PSO), and TLIF (1-2 level TLIF at L4-S1). Comparative analyses were performed on demographics, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, complications, and PROMs.

RESULTS

Among the 96 included patients, 40 underwent ALIF, 27 underwent PSO, and 29 underwent TLIF. At baseline, cohorts had comparable age, sex, race, Edmonton frailty scores, and radiographic spinopelvic parameters (P > 0.05). However, PSO was performed more often in revision cases (P < 0.001). Following surgery, L4-S1 lordosis correction (P = 0.001) was comparable among ALIF and PSO patients and caudal lordotic apex migration (P = 0.044) was highest among ALIF patients. PSO patients had higher intraoperative estimated blood loss (P < 0.001) and motor deficits (P = 0.049), and in-hospital ICU admission (P = 0.022) and blood products given (P = 0.004), but were otherwise comparable in terms of length of stay, blood transfusion given, and postoperative admission to rehab. Likewise, 90-day postoperative complication profiles and 6-week PROMs were comparable as well.

CONCLUSIONS

ALIF can restore L4-S1 sagittal alignment as powerfully as PSO, with fewer intraoperative and in-hospital complications. When feasible, ALIF is a suitable alternative to PSO and likely superior to TLIF for correcting L4-S1 lordosis among patients with severe sagittal malalignment.

Sagittal spinal alignment measurements and evaluation: Historical perspective

Spinal alignment analysis play an important role in evaluating patients and planning surgical corrections for adult spinal deformity. The history of these parameters is relatively short with the first parameter, the Cobb angle, introduced in 1948 as part of an effort to improve scoliosis evaluation. New developments in the field were limited for nearly 30 years before better imaging technology encouraged new theories and later data about spinal alignment and the relationship between the spine and pelvis. These efforts would ultimately contribute to the creation of foundational spinal alignment parameters, including pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. By the 1990s, spinal alignment had become a sustained area of investigation for spinal surgeons and researchers. Novel alignment parameters have since been introduced as our knowledge has evolved and has allowed for valuable research that demonstrates the clinical and surgical value of alignment measurement. This manuscript will explore the history of spinal alignment analysis over the decades.

Predicting Immediate Lordosis Restoration After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and the Effect of Posterior Column Osteotomies

OBJECTIVE

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can be combined with posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) to maximize lordotic correction. This study compares radiographic changes in regional and segmental lordosis in patients undergoing ALIF with and without PCOs.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old who underwent ALIF at 1 or 2 segments at a single institution (January 2014-July 2020) were included. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were determined, and a propensity-matched analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (53 [54%] men) underwent ALIF at 129 levels (mean [SD], 1.3 [0.46] levels; median [range] age, 61 [32-83] years). PCOs were performed in 13 (13%) patients at 19 (15%) segments. PCOs included 13 Schwab grade 1 and 6 grade 2 osteotomies. All measures, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neural foramen height, increased significantly after surgery (P ≤ 0.003). In the propensity-matched analysis, PCO was associated with greater increases in lumbar lordosis (14.9° vs. 8.2°, P = 0.02), segmental lordosis (14.0° vs. 9.6°, P = 0.03), and disc angle (15.0° vs. 10.2°, P = 0.046). The change in disc angle more closely approximated the inherent lordosis of the cage when PCO was performed (94% vs. 62%, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing PCOs and ALIFs significantly increased the radiographic correction of overall and segmental lordosis in the selected patient cohort. The disc angle achieved with ALIF without PCOs was approximately 60% of the cage lordosis. The addition of PCO allowed for greater segmental compression, enabling the disc angle to reach nearly 100% of the inherent interbody cage lordosis.

Reliability of the Biomechanical Assessment of the Sagittal Lumbar Spine and Pelvis on Radiographs Used in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Biomechanical analysis of the sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine and pelvis on radiographs is common in clinical practices including chiropractic, physical therapy, scoliosis-related thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) management, orthopedics, and neurosurgery. Of specific interest is the assessment of pelvic morphology and the relationship between angle of pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis to pain, disability, and clinical treatment of spine conditions. The current state of the literature on the reliability of common methods quantifying these parameters on radiographs is limited. Methods: The objective of this systematic review is to identify and review the available studies on the reliability of different methods of biomechanical analysis of sagittal lumbo-pelvic parameters used in clinical practice. Our review followed the recommendations of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The design of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379873). Results: The search strategy yielded a total of 2387 articles. A total of 1539 articles were screened after deduplication and exclusion by automation tools, leaving 473 full-text articles that were retrieved. After exclusion, 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. The preponderance of the evidence showed good to excellent reliability for biomechanical assessment of sagittal lumbo-pelvic spine alignment. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review of the literature show that sagittal radiographic analysis of spinal biomechanics and alignment of the human lumbo-pelvic spine is a reliable tool for aiding diagnosis and management in clinical settings.

Modern Concepts in Sagittal Curve Measurement: Comparison of Spline-Based and Fixed Landmark Measurements in a Cohort of 1520 Healthy Subjects

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare the spline-based measurement of sagittal spinal curvatures to fixed landmarks in a normative population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent research has stressed the importance of considering sagittal curvature in its entirety using a spline reconstruction. To date, no data supports the superiority of this method in comparison to classic measurement methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Full-spine biplanar radiographs of subjects over 20 years old who had normal radiographs were analyzed. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured following two modalities: either using predefined landmarks (TK T1T12 , TK T5T12 , and LL L1S1 ) or spline-based measurement (TK Spline and LL spline ).

RESULTS

A total of 1520 subjects were included (mean 54yo). The mean difference between TK spline and TK T1T12 was 1.4° and between TK spline and TK T5T12 was 11.7° ( P <0.001). LL spline was significantly larger than LL L1S1 (55° vs . 54°, P<0.001 ). LL spline and LL L1S1 were correlated ( R =0.950, P <0.001). Pelvic incidence had no influence on the difference between LL spline and LL L1S1 ( R =-0.034, P= 0.184). Using LL L1S1 measurements, LL was underestimated in 17% of the cases. The comparison of outlier distributions according to age groups ( P =0.175), sex ( P =0.937), or pelvic incidence groups ( P =0.662) found no difference. There were significantly more outliers in Roussouly type 1 compared with other types (56%, P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the use of TK T1T12 and LL L1S1 is acceptable to assess spinal sagittal curvatures. However, TK T5T12 is not accurate for the thoracic curve and should be used with caution. LL L1S1 can be used to accurately assess the lumbar curve, except in Roussouly type 1.

What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?

INTRODUCTION

Degenerative spondylolisthesis causes translational and angular malalignment, resulting in a loss of segmental lordosis. This leads to compensatory adjustments in adjacent levels to maintain balance. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are common techniques at L4-5. This study compares compensatory changes at adjacent L3-4 and L5-S1 levels six months post LLIF versus TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.

METHODS

A retrospective study included patients undergoing L4-5 LLIF or TLIF with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation (no posterior osteotomy) for grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Pre-op and 6-month post-op radiographs measured segmental lordosis (L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI), along with PI-LL mismatch. Multiple regressions were used for hypothesis testing.

RESULTS

113 patients (61 LLIF, 52 TLIF) were studied. TLIF showed less change in L4-5 lordosis (mean = 1.04°, SD = 4.34) compared to LLIF (mean = 4.99°, SD = 5.53) (p = 0.003). L4-5 angle changes didn't correlate with L3-4 changes, and no disparity between LLIF and TLIF was found (all p > 0.16). In LLIF, greater L4-5 lordosis change predicted reduced compensatory L5-S1 lordosis (p = 0.04), while no significant relationship was observed in TLIF patients (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

LLIF at L4-5 increases lordosis at the operated level, with compensatory decrease at L5-S1 but not L3-4. This reciprocal loss at adjacent L5-S1 may explain inconsistent improvement in lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) post L4-5 fusion.

Flexible posterior vertebral tethering for the management of Scheuermann's kyphosis: correction by using growth modulation-clinical and radiographic outcomes of the first 10 patients with at least 3 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

The present prospective cohort study was intended to present the minimum 3 years' results of flexible posterior vertebral tethering (PVT) applied to 10 skeletally immature patients with SK to question, if it could be an alternative to fusion.

METHODS

Ten skeletally immature patients with radiographically confirmed SK, who had flexible (minimum 35%) kyphotic curves (T2-T12), were included. A decision to proceed with PVT was based on curve progression within the brace, and/or persistent pain, and/or unacceptable cosmetic concerns of the patient/caregivers, and/or non-compliance within the brace.

RESULTS

Patients had an average age of 13.1 (range 11-15) and an average follow-up duration of 47.6 months (range 36-60). Posterior vertebral tethering (PVT) was undertaken to all patients by utilizing Wiltse approach and placing monoaxial pedicle screws intermittently. At the final follow-up: mean pre-operative thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis improved from 73.6°-45.7° to 34.7°-32.1°. Mean sagittal vertical axis, vertebral wedge angle and total SRS-22 scores improved significantly. A fulcrum lateral X-ray obtained at the latest follow-up, showed that the tethered levels remained mobile.

CONCLUSION

This study, for the first time in the literature, concluded, that as a result of growth modulation applied to skeletally immature patients with SK, flexible PVT was detected to yield gradual correction of the thoracic kyphosis by reverting the pathological vertebral wedging process, while keeping the mobility of the tethered segments in addition to successful clinical-functional results. The successful results of the present study answered the role of the PVT as a viable alternative to fusion in skeletally immature patients with SK.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The research focused on the postoperative effect of using interbody fusion cage in lumbar posterior lamina decompression and interbody fusion with pedicle screw by comparing the postoperative effect of using 3D printing (Ti6Al4V) and PEEK material interbody fusion cage.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients with lumbar degenerative diseases from the Department of Spine Surgery of Tianjin Hospital were included in the study cohort. They were divided into 3D group (n = 39) and PEEK group (n = 52) according to the use of interbody fusion cage. The imaging data of the patients were collected and the postoperative data of the 2 groups were compared to evaluate patients' health status and the recovery of lumbar structure and function after operation.

RESULTS

Combined with the degree of fusion, the clinical effect of 3D printing titanium alloy interbody fusion cage was comprehensively judged. At the last follow-up, the JOA score, ODI index, VAS, prolo function score, and SF-36 scale of the 2 groups showed that the clinical symptoms were better than those before operation (P < .05). The height of intervertebral disc, the area of intervertebral foramen and the physiological curvature of lumbar vertebrae increased in varying degrees after operation (P < .05). At the last follow-up, the vertebral cage fusion rates were as high as 89.13% and 90.91% in the 3D and PEEK groups, with collapse rates of 6.5% and 4.5%, respectively. There were 10 cases of cage displacement in 3D group and 7 cases of cage displacement in PEEK group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cage can obtain good clinical effect in the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Posterior lumbar lamina decompression, bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with 3D printed cage interbody fusion is excellent in rebuilding the stability of lumbar vertebrae. 3D printed interbody fusion cage can be an ideal substitute material for intervertebral bone grafting. The stable fusion time of interbody fusion cage after lumbar fusion is mostly from 3 months to half a year after operation.

Early Compensatory Segmental Angle Changes at L3-L4 and L4-L5 After a L5-S1 Interbody Fusion for a Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

The retrospective study included patients who underwent an L5-S1 anterior (ALIF) or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for grade 1 spondylolisthesis from 2018 to 2022.

OBJECTIVE

To compare early reciprocal changes at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 adjacent levels 6 months after ALIF or TLIF at L5-S1.

BACKGROUND

Degenerative and chronic isthmic spondylolistheses often result in decreased segmental lordosis (SL) at L5-S1. This can lead to lordotic overcompensation at adjacent levels to maintain spinopelvic balance. However, the fate of adjacent angles after interbody fusion is not well understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preoperative and 6-month postoperative measurements of SL (L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence (PI) were obtained from sagittal standing radiographs. Preliminary t tests were performed for descriptive purposes, and multiple regression was used for hypothesis testing.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (50 ALIF and 48 TLIF). A greater amount of lordosis achieved at L5-S1 was significantly associated with a greater reduction of SL at L4-L5 ( r = -0.65, P < 0.001) or L3-L4 ( r = -0.46, P < 0.001). A greater preoperative PI was associated with a greater reduction of SL at L4-L5 ( r = -0.42, P < 0.001) and at L3-L4 ( r = -0.44, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

At 6 months after a lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1, greater compensatory changes with lordosis reduction are observed at the supra-adjacent L4-L5 and L3-L4 levels in patients achieving greater L5-S1 SL. In addition, preoperative PI played a role in influencing lordotic correction.

Comparison of Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score and SRS-Schwab ASD Classification in the Analysis of Surgical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity

Study design

The GAP score predicted post-operative mechanical complications more effectively whereas SRS-Schwab classification improved evaluation of postoperative PROMs.

Objective

The study compared the GAP Score and SRS-Schwab Classification in predicting surgical outcomes for adult spinal deformity (ASD) and elucidated whether both systems should be included in the preoperative planning.

Materials and methods

Radiographic measurements and health-related quality of life scores at baseline, 6 weeks after surgery, and the last follow-up were collected from a cohort of 69 ASD patients subjected to long segment spinal fusion surgery after they were grouped by GAP score and SRS-Schwab classification respectively. Fisher's exact test and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the incidence of mechanical complications and the discriminant capacity during revision surgery between the two groups. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were compared by one-way ANOVA, and the proportions of MCID achieved for PROMs compared by chi-square test between the two groups.

Results

The overall incidence of mechanical complications and revision surgery were 42% and 8.7%. Both GAP score and its categories predicted mechanical complications and revision surgery, but the GAP score system could not predict the improvements of PROMs. The SRS-Schwab classification could predict the occurrence of postoperative mechanical complications and improvements of postoperative PROMs between the aligned, moderately misaligned and severely misaligned groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Hence, a comprehensive surgical strategy for postoperative planning may improve patients' quality of life and minimize mechanical complications.

Graphical Abstract

Comprehensive assessment of global spinal sagittal alignment and related normal spinal loads in a healthy population

Abnormal postoperative global sagittal alignment (GSA) is associated with an increased risk of mechanical complications after spinal surgery. Typical assessment of sagittal alignment relies on a few selected measures, disregarding global complexity and variability of the sagittal curvature. The normative range of spinal loads associated with GSA has not yet been considered in clinical evaluation. The study objectives were to develop a new GSA assessment method that holistically describes the inherent relationships within GSA and to estimate the related spinal loads. Vertebral endplates were annotated on radiographs of 85 non-pathological subjects. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to derive a Statistical Shape Model (SSM). Associations between identified GSA variability modes and conventional alignment measures were assessed. Simulations of respective Shape Modes (SMs) were performed using an established musculoskeletal AnyBody model to estimate normal variation in cervico-thoraco-lumbar loads. The first six principal components explained 97.96% of GSA variance. The SSM provides the normative range of GSA and a visual representation of the main variability modes. Normal variation relative to the population mean in identified alignment features was found to influence spinal loads, e.g. the lower bound of the second shape mode (SM2-2σ) corresponds to an increase in L4L5-compression by 378.64 N (67.86%). Six unique alignment features were sufficient to describe GSA almost entirely, demonstrating the value of the proposed method for an objective and comprehensive analysis of GSA. The influence of these features on spinal loads provides a normative biomechanical reference, eventually guiding surgical planning of deformity correction in the future.

Quantifying the Spinal Lordosis Ratio Unique to the Type of Spinal Sagittal Alignment in a Normal Population

STUDY DESIGN

Data collection of radiological parameters in non-pathological adult spines.

OBJECTIVES

Establishing a baseline database for measurements of the spinal lordosis ratio between upper and lower arcs of the lumbar spine unique to each type of spine described by Roussouly's classification. Illustrating the importance of correct rationing of the upper and lower arcs.

METHODS

Standardised standing true lateral plain radiographs of the spine (including base of skull and proximal femurs) from 373 adult volunteers were obtained. Exclusion criteria : any history of disease involving the spine, pelvis, hips or lower limbs. Incidental detection of any spinal deformity on radiography also excluded further participation in this study. Sacro-pelvic parameters data collected : Pelvic Incidence (PI), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Sacral Slope (SS), location of Inflection Point, number of vertebras in the spinal lordosis and type of Roussouly's spine. Values of upper arc, lower arc and spinal lordosis ratio (SLR) was determined.

RESULTS

Bivariate analysis revealed statistically significant (P < .0001) correlation between the types of sagittal spinal alignments based on Roussouly's classification and the SLR. Type 1: SLR .76 ± .17, Type 2: SLR .60 ± .18, Type 3 with anteverted pelvis: SLR .53 ± .11, Type 3: SLR .49 ± .12, Type4: SLR .41 ± .11.

CONCLUSION

With this data we are able to quantify the ratio of lumbar lordosis unique to each type of Roussouly's spine. It functions as a guide when planning lumbar spine surgeries in order to restore the SLR correctly and thus prevent post-op complications such as proximal junction kyphosis.

Sagittal Full-Spine vs. Sectional Cervical Lateral Radiographs: Are the Measurements of Cervical Alignment Interchangeable?

(1) Background: This study assessed the relationship between cervical spine parameters taken on standing full-spine lateral radiographic images compared to sectional lateral cervical radiographs. (2) Methods: Full-spine (FS) and sectional lateral cervical (LC) radiographs from four spine treatment facilities across the USA retrospectively provided data collected on 220 persons to assess the comparison of three sagittal cervical radiographic measurements between the two views. The measures included cervical lordosis using the absolute rotation angle from C2-C7, sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7, and atlas plane angle to horizontal. Linear correlation and R2 models were used for statistical comparison of the measures for the two views. (3) Results: The mean values of the three measurements were statistically different from each other: C2-C7 translation (FS = 19.84 ± 11.98 vs. LC = 21.18 ± 11.8), C2-C7 lordosis (FS = -15.3 ± 14.63 vs. LC = -18.32 ± 13.16), and atlas plane (FS = -19.99 ± 8.88 vs. LC = -22.56 ± 8.93), where all values were p < 0.001. Weak-to-moderate-to-strong correlations existed between the full-spine and sectional lateral cervical radiographic variables. The R2 values varied based on the measurement were R2 = 0.768 (p < 0.001) for sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7 (strong), R2 = 0.613 (p < 0.001) for the absolute rotation angle C2-C7 (moderate), and R2 = 0.406 (p < 0.001) for the atlas plane line (weak). Though a linear correlation was identified, there were consistent intra-person differences between the measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views, where the full-spine view consistently underestimated the magnitude of the variables. (4) Conclusion: Key sagittal cervical radiographic measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views show striking intra-person differences. The findings of this study confirm that full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views provide different biomechanical magnitudes of cervical sagittal alignment, and caution should be exercised by health care providers as these are not interchangeable. We recommend the LC view for measurement of cervical sagittal alignment variables.

Can the Mismatch of Measured Pelvic Morphology vs. Lumbar Lordosis Predict Chronic Low Back Pain Patients?

Background: Measures of lumbar lordosis (LL) and elliptical modeling variables have been shown to discriminate between normal and chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Pelvic morphology influences an individual's sagittal lumbar alignment. Our purpose is to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of lumbar sagittal radiographic alignment and modeling variables to identify if these can discriminate between normal controls and CLBP patients. Methods: We conducted a computer analysis of digitized vertebral body corners on lateral lumbar radiographs of normal controls and CLBP patients. Fifty normal controls were attained from a required pre-employment physical examination (29 men; 21 women; mean age of 27.7 ± 8.5 years), with no history of low back pain, a normal spinal examination, no pathologies, anomalies, or instability. Additionally, 50 CLBP patients (29 men; 29.5 ± 8 years of age) were randomly chosen and matched to the characteristics of the controls. The inclusion criteria required no abnormalities on lumbar spine radiographs. The parameters included the following: ARA L1-L5 lordosis, ARA T12-S1 lordosis, Cobb T12-S1, b/a elliptical modelling ratio, sacral base angle (SBA), and S1 posterior tangent to vertical (PTS1). Two measures of pelvic morphology were determined for each person-the angle of pelvic incidence (API) and posterior tangent pelvic incidence angle (PTPIA)-and the relationships between API - ARA T12-S1, API - Cobb T12-S1, and API - ARA L1-5 was determined. Descriptive statistics and correlations among the primary variables were determined. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) for primary variables were analyzed. Results: The mean values of LL were statistically different between the normal and CLBP groups (p < 0.001), indicating a hypo-lordotic lumbar spine for the CLBP group. The mean b/a ratio was lower in the chronic pain group (p = 0.0066). The pelvic morphology variables were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). API had a stronger correlation to the SBA and Cobb T12-S1 than PTPIA did, while PTPIA had a stronger correlation to the S1 tangent and ARA T12-S1 than API did. While CLBP patients had a stronger correlation of ARA T12-S1 and Cobb T12-S1 relative to the pelvic morphology, they also had a reduced correlation of ARA L1-L5 lordosis relative to their SBA and pelvic morphology measures. API - T12-S1, API - L1-L5, and API - Cobb T12-S1 were statistically different between the groups, p < 0.001. Using ROC curve analyses, it was identified that ARA L1-L5 lordosis of 36° and ARA T12-S1 of 68° have a good sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between normal and CLBP patients. ROC curve analyses identified that lordosis ARAT12-S1 < 68° (AUC = 0.83), lordosis ARAL1-L5 < 36° (AUC = 0.78), API - ARA T12-S1 < -18° (AUC = 0.75), API - ARAL1-L5 > 35° (AUC = 0.71), and API - Cobb T12-S1 < -5° (AUC = 0.69) had moderate to good discrimination between groups (AUC = 0.83, 0.78, 0.75, and 0.72). Conclusions: Pelvic morphology is similar between normal and CLBP patients. CLBP patients have an abnormal 'fit' of their API - ARAT12-S1 and L1-L5 lumbar lordosis relative to their pelvic morphology and sacral tilt shown as a hypolordosis.

Sagittal Alignment in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Surgical Planning

➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis.➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases.➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine.➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.

Mid-Term Results of Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch

BACKGROUND

Recent literature suggests that sagittal imbalance is a risk factor for adjacent segment disease following fusion surgery. This study explored the influence of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch on the mid-term results and reoperation rate after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

METHODS

The participants of this study included 253 patients (80 men and 173 women; mean age 68.2 years) who underwent L4-5 single-segment PLIF. Preoperative PI-LL mismatch was defined as a PI-LL of 30° or greater. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL mismatch group; group M, Control group; group C), and the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 253 cases, 25 were classified in group M and 228 in group C. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 5 years postoperatively was 23.0 ± 3.6 in group M and 23.5 ± 5.1 in group C, and the recovery rate was 66.2 ± 32.6% in group M and 64.6 ± 21.4% in group C and there was no significant difference in the recovery rate between the 2 groups. All radiographic parameters except sacral slope were significantly worse in group M. One patient (4.3%) in Group M and 18 patients (7.8%) in Group C required revision surgery at 2.4 years (range 0.0-5.0) and there was no significant difference in the revision rate between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The mid-term results of L4-5 single-level PLIF were compared with and without PI-LL mismatch, with the threshold defined as 30°; however, there were no significant differences in both the Japanese Orthopaedic Association recovery and reoperation rates between the 2 groups.

Preoperative Disc Angle is an Important Predictor of Segmental Lordosis After Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of interbody cages inserted via posterior approach on segmental lordosis in the setting of preoperative lordotic vs kyphotic discs in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on assessment and management of LDS patients from 2 contributing centres. Patients were analyzed preoperatively and at 12-month follow-up with standing lumbar radiographs. Index level segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL), disc angle and global lumbar lordosis was measured. Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on index level disc angle and procedure: preoperative lordotic posterolateral fusion (group L-PLF); preoperative kyphotic PLF (group K-PLF); preoperative lordotic interbody fusion (IF) (group L-IF); preoperative kyphotic IF (group K-IF).

RESULTS

A total of 100/111 (90%) patients completed follow-up with 40 in group L-IF and 48 in group K-IF. There were 18 patients in group L-PLF and 5 in group K-PLF. Among patients with preoperatively lordotic disc angles who had a worsening of SLL, group L-IF had worse SLL than group L-PLF patients, with differences persisting at one-year (mean difference 2.30, 95% CI, .3, 4.3, P = .029). Patients in group K-IF achieved improvement in SLL at one-year more frequently than group L-IF (67% vs 44%, P = .046), with similar mean improvement magnitude between groups L-IF and K-IF (-1.1, 95% CI, -3.7, 1.6, P = .415).

CONCLUSION

Segmental lordosis worsening was greater with preoperative index lordotic disc angles when an interbody cage was used. Patients who have a kyphotic disc preoperatively gain more lordosis with interbody cage use.

Development of End-to-End Artificial Intelligence Models for Surgical Planning in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly used technique for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. In this study, we developed a fully computer-supported pipeline to predict both the cage height and the degree of lumbar lordosis subtraction from the pelvic incidence (PI-LL) after TLIF surgery, utilizing preoperative X-ray images. The automated pipeline comprised two primary stages. First, the pretrained BiLuNet deep learning model was employed to extract essential features from X-ray images. Subsequently, five machine learning algorithms were trained using a five-fold cross-validation technique on a dataset of 311 patients to identify the optimal models to predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL. LASSO regression and support vector regression demonstrated superior performance in predicting interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL, respectively. For cage height prediction, the root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated as 1.01, and the model achieved the highest accuracy at a height of 12 mm, with exact prediction achieved in 54.43% (43/79) of cases. In most of the remaining cases, the prediction error of the model was within 1 mm. Additionally, the model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting PI-LL, with an RMSE of 5.19 and an accuracy of 0.81 for PI-LL stratification. In conclusion, our results indicate that machine learning models can reliably predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL.

Influences of lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae for anterior lumbar interbody fusion

Lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are frequent congenital variances of the spine and are associated with increased spinal degeneration. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data whether bony alterations associated with LSTV result in reduced segmental restoration of lordosis when performing ALIF. 58 patients with monosegmental stand-alone ALIF in the spinal segment between the 24th and 25th vertebra (L5/S1)/(L5/L6) where included. Of these, 17 patients had LSTV and were matched to a control population by age and sex. Pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc height and depth were compared. LSTV-patients had a significantly reduced segmental lordosis L4/5 (p = 0.028) and L5/S1/(L5/L6) (p = 0.041) preoperatively. ALIF resulted in a significant increase in segmental lordosis L5/S1 (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, the preoperatively reduced segmental lordosis was no longer significantly different in segments L4/5 (p = 0.349) and L5/S1/(L5/6) (p = 0.576). ALIF is associated with a significant increase in segmental lordosis in the treated segment even in patients with LSTV. Therefore, ALIF is a sufficient intervention for restoring the segmental lordosis in these patients as well.

Erector Spinae Atrophy Correlates with Global Sagittal Imbalance and Postoperative Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Incidence in Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between lumbar erector muscle atrophy and global sagittal imbalance in lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK) and with postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Lumbar erector muscle atrophy has been studied in LDK. However, its role in the compensatory mechanism is still under intense discussion, and the role of erector spinae (ES) muscle is always overlooked.

METHODS

This study enrolled 51 patients with LDK out of 382 patients with adult degenerative spinal deformity. Baseline information was reviewed including demographic data and complications. Sagittal spinopelvic alignments and global imbalance parameters were assessed on full-length X-ray images of the spine. Muscularity and the fatty infiltration area of the ES and multifidus (MF) were measured at the L4/5 level on preoperative magnetic resonance image to evaluate the lumbar erector muscle atrophy. Stratification by sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was performed: group 1 with SVA <100 mm and group 2 with SVA >100 mm, and these groups were compared. Spearman correlation and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze and define risk factors of postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

RESULTS

Group 2 had lower ES and MF muscularity than group 1. ES muscularity correlated with SVA (r=-0.510, p<0.003), lumbar lordosis (r=-0.415, p<0.018), and postoperative PJK (r=-0.508, p<0.022). MF muscularity did not correlate with the above parameters. Multivariable logistic regression analysis verified ES muscularity (odds ratio [OR], 0.001; p<0.039) and SVA (OR, 1.034; p<0.048) as the risk factors for postoperative PJK.

CONCLUSIONS

ES atrophy, besides the MF, is an important predictor in distinguishing decompensated LDK from well-compensated ones. It plays an important role in compensatory mechanism, not only correlates with global sagittal imbalance but also ties to PJK after deformity corrective surgery.

Pelvic Incidence as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Anterior Column Realignment with Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release to Restore Lordosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify variables that may contribute to the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients with long lumbo-sacral and thoraco-lumbo-pelvic constructs undergoing anterior column realignment (ACR) with anterior longitudinal ligament release (ALLR).

METHODS

Data of patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent ACR with ALLR at L3-4 were collected retrospectively from medical records and a prospectively maintained spine research database between 2016 and 2022.

RESULTS

Eleven (41%) developed PJF at a mean of 24 ± 21 months from the index surgery. The cohort was then divided into 2 groups for analysis, 13 subjects in the high pelvic incidence (PI) group (defined as PI ≥ 55°) and 14 subjects in the low PI group (defined as PI < 55°). Visual Analog Scale for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 9.5 to 2.1 and 61 to 10 in the high PI group, and from 8.9 to 2.4 and 60.9 to 10.3 in the low PI group, respectively. PI (P = 0.004), sacral slope (P = 0.005), and postoperative PI-lumbar lordosis mismatch (P = 0.02) were found to be significant predictors of PJF. The receiver operator curve revealed a cutoff PI value ≤ 53° (95% confidence interval: 52°-64°), below which the risk of PJF becomes significantly higher in patients undergoing ACR with ALLR at L3-4.

CONCLUSIONS

PI may be a predictor of PJF and highly correlates with ACR-ALLR levels. In patients undergoing L3-4 ACR-ALLR, a PI value of ≤53° is associated with a significantly elevated risk of PJF. Preoperative planning of ACR-ALLR level based on normal sagittal alignment in otherwise healthy individuals may mitigate the risk of PJF development in patients with adult spinal deformity treated with ACR-ALLR.

Validation of Roussouly classification in predicting the occurrence of adjacent segment disease after short-level lumbar fusion surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent studies demonstrated that restoring sagittal alignment to the original Roussouly type can remarkably reduce complication rates after adult spinal deformity surgery. However, there is still no data proving the benefit of maintaining ideal Roussouly shape in the lumbar degenerative diseases and its association with the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Thus, this study was performed to validate the usefulness of Roussouly classification to predict the occurrence of ASD after lumbar fusion surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 234 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent 1- or 2-level fusion surgery. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between ASD and non-ASD groups. The patients were classified by both "theoretical" [based on pelvic incidence (PI)] and "current" (based on sacral slope) Roussouly types. The patients were defined as "matched" if their "current" shapes matched the "theoretical" types and otherwise as "mismatched". The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with ASD. Finally, clinical data and spinopelvic parameters of "theoretical" and "current" types were compared.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up duration of 70.6 months, evidence of ASD was found in the 68 cases. Postoperatively, ASD group had more "current" shapes classified as type 1 or 2 and fewer as type 3 than the non-ASD group (p < 0.001), but the distribution of "theoretical" types was similar between groups. Moreover, 80.9% (55/68) of patients with ASD were mismatched, while 48.2% (80/166) of patients without ASD were mismatched (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.058)], 2-level fusion (OR = 2.9830), postoperative distal lordosis (DL, OR = 0.949) and mismatched Roussouly type (OR = 4.629) as independent risk factors of ASD. Among the four "theoretical" types, type 2 had the lowest lumbar lordosis, DL, and segmental lordosis. When considering the "current" types, current type 2 was associated with higher rates of 2-level fusion, worse DL, and greater pelvic tilt compared with other current types.

CONCLUSIONS

DL loss and mismatched Roussouly type were significant risk factors of ASD. To decrease the incidence of ASD, an appropriate value of DL should be achieved to restore sagittal alignment back to the ideal Roussouly type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Correlation analysis of surgical outcomes and spino-pelvic parameters in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Objectives

The study aims to analyze factors that affect the postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients and explore the appropriate pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) value for Chinese DLS patients.

Methods

DLS patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. General information, spino-pelvic parameters, and HRQOL were collected. Correlation analysis was used to explore the spino-pelvic parameters that affect the postoperative HRQOL. Thresholds of each parameter were obtained using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Regardless of the effect of age, DLS patients were classified into three groups according to the SRS-Schwab classification: group 0 means PI-LL < 10°, group+means PI-LL = 10-20°, and group ++ means PI-LL > 20°. Postoperative HRQOL was analyzed using variance methods. The ROC curve was used to measure the appropriate PI-LL threshold. When considering the effect of age, the patients with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) < 75% percentile were considered to have a satisfactory clinical outcome, which was drawn to an equation between PI-LL, age, and PI by multiple linear regression equation.

Results

A total of 71 patients were included. Compared with the control group, there were significant differences in both postoperative ODI and Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) scores when the postoperative Cobb angle ≤11°, postoperative lumbar lordosis index (LLI) > 0.8, postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≤ 5 cm, postoperative T1 pelvic angle (TPA) ≤ 16° and postoperative global tilt (GT) ≤ 22°, respectively. Regardless of the effect of age, there was a statistical difference in postoperative HRQOL between group 0 and group ++. The PI-LL threshold derived from the ROC curve was 14.4°. Compared with the PI-LL > 14° group, the PI-LL ≤ 14° group achieved a lower postoperative ODI score and a higher postoperative SRS-22 score. Considering the influence of age, the equation for ideal PI-LL was PI-LL = 0.52age + 0.38PI-39.4 (R = 0.509, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

PI-LL was an important parameter that affects the postoperative HRQOL of DLS patients. Sufficient LL should be restored during the operation (LL ≥ PI-14°). The appropriate PI-LL value was affected by age. Smaller LL needed to be restored as the age increased.

Postoperative lordosis distribution index, patient reported outcome measures, and revision surgery following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Objective

Lordosis Distribution Index (LDI) is a new radiographic parameter associated with postoperative residual symptoms in patients undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). Recently, it has been applied on patients undergoing instrumented spine surgery, however not correlated to Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMs). This study investigates whether the obtained the postoperative LDI after TLIF surgery correlates with the clinical outcome measured with PROMs.

Methods

This study was based on prospectively obtained data in patients undergoing TLIF throughout 2017 at a Danish university hospital. Medical records and the DaneSpine Database were accessed to obtain preoperative, operative and follow-up data. Primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included revision rate and additional PROMs.

Results

126 patients were included. 70 patients were classified with normolordosis (56 %), 42 hypolordosis (33 %) and 14 hyperlordosis (11 %). All groups experienced significant radiological changes undergoing surgery. Average reduction in ODI at 12 months postoperatively was -15.3 (±20.0). Minimally clinical important difference was achieved in 68 patients (54.0 %). No significant difference in PROMs between LDI-groups was observed in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. Revision surgery was performed in 8 patients with normolordosis (11.4 %), 7 hypolordosis (16.7 %) and 4 hyperlordosis (28.6 %).

Conclusions

We found no significant correlation between postoperative LDI subgroups of normolordotic, hypo- or hyperlordotic patients and the clinical outcome of posterolateral fusion and TLIF surgery. A trend towards lower rate of revision surgery in the normolordotic group compared to the hypo- and hyperlordotic group was observed.

Do adult spinal deformity patients who achieve and maintain PI-LL < 10 have better patient-reported and clinical outcomes compared to patients with PI-LL ≥ 10? A propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate whether patients with spinopelvic mismatch (PI-LL ≥ 10) report worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared to patients who achieve PI-LL < 10 at 2-year postop.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to analyze patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion due to deformity, as defined by one or more of the following criteria: PI-LL ≥ 25°, T1 pelvic angle ≥ 30°, sagittal vertical axis ≥ 15 cm, thoracic scoliosis ≥ 70°, thoracolumbar scoliosis ≥ 50°, coronal malalignment ≥ 7 cm, or those who underwent a three-column osteotomy or fusion with ≥ 12 levels. Key outcomes were total Scoliosis Research Society-22r, Oswestry Disability Index (PROs), and reoperation at 1- and 2-year postop. Patients were dichotomized based on their 2-year alignment: PI-LL ≥ 10° and PI-LL < 10°. A multivariable logistic regression model identified factors associated with achieving PI-LL < 10°, and independent predictors were matched using propensity score matching. Binary outcomes within matched cohorts were analyzed using the McNemar test, while continuous outcomes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-four patients with 2-year follow-up were included; mean age was 50.5 (standard error mean (SEM): 1.4) years, body mass index was 24.1(SEM 1.0), and number of operative levels was 13.5 (SEM 0.3). 84 (51.2%) and 80 (48.8%) patients achieved PI-LL < 10 and PI-LL ≥ 10 at 2-year follow-up, respectively. Baseline pelvic incidence [odds ratio (OR): 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99)] and baseline PI-LL [OR: 0.95 (95% CI 0.9-0.99)] were independent predictors of achieving PI-LL < 10 at 2 years. When comparing propensity matched pairs, no significant differences were found in baseline PROs. At both 1- and 2-year follow-up, outcomes on the SRS-22r scale were nearly identical for both groups (function [4.1(0.1) vs 4.0 (0.1), P = 0.75] ,Pain [3.9 (0.2) vs 3.9 (0.2), P = 0.86], appearance [4.2 (0.2) vs 3.8 (0.2), P = 0.08], mental health [4.1 (0.2) vs 4.1 (0.1), P = 0.96], satisfaction [4.4 (0.2) vs 4.4 (0.2), P = 0.72], and total [90.2 (2.5) vs 88.1 (2.5), P = 0.57]). Additionally, ODI scores at 2 years were comparable [18.1 (2.9) vs 22.4 (2.9), P = 0.30]. The 90-day reoperation rate was 2.6% (one patient) in both matched cohorts (P > 0.99). There was no significant difference in 1-year (P > 0.9999) or 2-year (P = 0.2207) reoperation rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients who achieve and maintain PI-LL < 10 2-years postop following adult spinal deformity surgery have nearly identical SRS-22r and ODI outcomes, and comparable 2-year reoperation rates as compared to patients who have PI-LL ≥ 10.

Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion (PTP LIF) with Anterior Docking: Preliminary functional and radiographic outcomes

Background

Disadvantages of lateral interbody fusion (LIF) through a direct, transpsoas approach include difficulties associated with lateral decubitus positioning and limited sagittal correction without anterior longitudinal ligament release or posterior osteotomy. Prior technical descriptions advocate anchoring or docking the retractor into the posterior to middle aspect of the disc space.

Methods

72 patients who underwent 116 total levels of Prone Transpsoas (PTP) LIF with anterior docking with a single surgeon between December 2021 and May 2023 were included. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, as well as postoperative functional and radiographic outcomes were recorded. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who underwent single-level PTP LIF with single-level percutaneous fixation (SLP). Patients in the SLP subgroup did not undergo direct decompression, release, or osteotomy.

Results

N=41 (56.9%) of cases included the L4-5 level. No vascular, bowel, or other visceral complications occurred. No patients developed a permanent motor deficit. Both the total cohort and the SLP group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in functional outcomes including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as well as all radiographic parameters measured. Mean total operative time (incision to completion of closure for lateral and posterior fusion) in the SLP group was 104.3 minutes with a significant downward trend with increasing surgeon experience. The SLP group demonstrated a 9.9° increase in segmental lordosis (SL), a 7.5° increase in lumbar lordosis (LL), 5.3° reduction in pelvic tilt (PT), and a decrease in pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) from 11.0° preoperatively to 3.9°, postoperatively (p<.01).

Conclusions

PTP LIF with anterior docking may address shortcomings associated with traditional lateral interbody fusion by producing safe and reproducible access with improved restoration of segmental lordosis and optimization of spinopelvic parameters.

Reduction of adolescent grade IV L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with anterior joystick manipulation during a combined anterior and posterior surgical approach: A case report

Background

High-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis poses a clinical challenge in the pediatric and adolescent population. Current surgical management using posterior-based approaches may lead to incomplete reduction and restoration of listhesis, disc height, and lordosis. Combined anterior and posterior approach addresses these issues but has been infrequently reported, mainly in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Neither offers good disc space visualization and control of spinal alignment during reduction.

Case Description

A healthy 17-year-old female presented with 9 months of progressively worsening lower back pain radiating down the left lower extremity and 3 inches of height loss. Diagnosis of grade IV L5-S1 spondylolisthesis was made using plain radiographs, CT, and MRI. Management with combined anterior and posterior fusion, involving the manual manipulation of segments using an anterior pedicle screw joystick, was pursued.

Outcome

Satisfactory alignment, solid arthrodesis, no complications, and improved patient reported outcomes.

Conclusions

Combined anterior and posterior fusion with anterior joystick manipulation allowed for full reduction of grade IV spondylolisthesis and restoration of disc/foraminal height and L5-S1 segmental lordosis without neurological complication. Although less commonly performed in children and adolescents, this surgical approach can assist in restoring optimal alignment in isthmic spondylolisthesis.

PreOperative Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity Goals: Level Selection and Alignment Goals

Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) is a complex pathologic condition with significant impact on quality of life, including pain, loss of function, and fatigue. Achieving realignment goals is crucial for long-term results. Reliable preoperative planning strategies, including nomograms, measurement tools, and level selection, are key to maximizing the likelihood of achieving a good outcome following ASD corrective surgery. This review covers recent literature on such strategies, including review of the different targets for realignment and their association with outcomes (both patients-reported outcomes and complications), selection of upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, and the latest innovation in preoperative planning for deformity surgery.