Extensive laminectomy for multilevel cervical stenosis with ligamentum flavum hypertrophy: more than 10 years follow-up

Safety and efficacy of ultrasonic bone scalpel compared with a high-speed drill in spinal surgery: our experience in sixty cases

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UBS (Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel) and HSD (High-speed drill) for performing anterior or posterior decompressions in patients with pathologies in cervical and lumbar regions.

METHODS

Between October 2022 and June 2024, 60 patients underwent surgery in which a UBS (Sonopet UST-2001; Stryker Neuro Spine ENT, MI, USA) and High-speed Midas Rex MR8 (Medtronic, Fort Worth, TX, USA) drill was used. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study included 27 men and 33 women with a mean age of 59,5 ± 14.6 years (range: 28-85). The following patient data were recorded: preoperative and postoperative JOA scores, intraoperative blood loss, and operative time for decompression in lumbar and cervical region.

RESULTS

In UBS group, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 166.0 ± 64.3 ml. The mean preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were 4.5 ± 1.0 and 8.6 ± 1.8 and the mean postoperative follow-up duration was 6.1 ± 4.4 months in UBS group. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 221.2 ± 93.4 ml in HSD group. The mean preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were 5.2 ± 1.1 and 8.2 ± 1.2 in HSD group. In the HSD group, the blood loss (BL) value was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to the UBS group. The preoperative/postoperative JOA score improvement in the UBS group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in the HSD group.

CONCLUSIONS

The UBS can be safely used in spinal surgery. It reduces intraoperative blood loss and provide better clinical improvement. Authors would like to emphasize that the UBS resects the bone with oscillatory movements rather than rolling motions and this mechanism of action is important in reducing the risk of dura mater injury.

Identification of milling status based on vibration signals using artificial intelligence in robot-assisted cervical laminectomy

BACKGROUND

With advances in science and technology, the application of artificial intelligence in medicine has significantly progressed. The purpose of this study is to explore whether the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) machine learning method can identify three milling states based on vibration signals: cancellous bone (CCB), ventral cortical bone (VCB), and penetration (PT) in robot-assisted cervical laminectomy.

METHODS

Cervical laminectomies were performed on the cervical segments of eight pigs using a robot. First, the bilateral dorsal cortical bone and part of the CCB were milled with a 5 mm blade and then the bilateral laminae were milled to penetration with a 2 mm blade. During the milling process using the 2 mm blade, the vibration signals were collected by the acceleration sensor, and the harmonic components were extracted using fast Fourier transform. The feature vectors were constructed with vibration signal amplitudes of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 kHz and the KNN was then trained by the features vector to predict the milling states.

RESULTS

The amplitudes of the vibration signals between VCB and PT were statistically different at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 kHz (P < 0.05), and the amplitudes of the vibration signals between CCB and VCB were significantly different at 0.5 and 1.5 kHz (P < 0.05). The KNN recognition success rates for the CCB, VCB, and PT were 92%, 98%, and 100%, respectively. A total of 6% and 2% of the CCB cases were identified as VCB and PT, respectively; 2% of VCB cases were identified as PT.

CONCLUSIONS

The KNN can distinguish different milling states of a high-speed bur in robot-assisted cervical laminectomy based on vibration signals. This method is feasible for improving the safety of posterior cervical decompression surgery.

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Laminectomy for Treating Cervical Stenosis: A Technical Note and Preliminary Results

Objective: The objective of this study was to introduce a surgical technique for the percutaneous decompression of cervical stenosis (CS) using a unilateral biportal endoscopic approach and characterize its early clinical and radiographic results. Materials and Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients with CS who needed surgical intervention were recruited. All enrolled patients underwent unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy (UBEL). All patients were followed postoperatively for >1 year. The preoperative and final follow-up evaluations included the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for neurological assessment, visual analogue scale (VAS) for axial pain and C2-C7 Cobb angle for cervical sagittal alignment. The postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: Thirteen males and six females were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up period was 16.3 ± 2.6 months. The mean operative time was 82.6 ± 18.4 min. Postoperative MRI and CT revealed ideal neural decompression of the treated segments in all patients. Preoperative VAS and JOA scores improved significantly after the surgery, and cervical lordosis was preserved on the postoperative images. Conclusions: UBEL was an effective surgical method for CS, which may also minimize iatrogenic damage to the posterior tension band (PTB) and help to maximize the preservation of the cervical lordosis.

The cervical sagittal curvature change in patients with or without PCSM after laminoplasty

Objective

After laminoplasty, the cervical sagittal curvature of some patients tend to be lordotic, this phenomenon cannot be explained by the theory of laminoplasty, and the reason remains unknown. We explored the possible role played by pinching cervical spondylotic myelopathy (PCSM) in the cervical sagittal curvature change in patients after laminoplasty.

Methods

From April 2017 to May 2019, we studied 122 patients undergoing laminoplasty with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). All patients were divided into Group A (anterior compression only, without PCSM) and Group B (both anterior and posterior compression, with PCSM). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure pain, and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score was derived. The cervical global angle (CGA) and the range of cervical motion (ROM) were compared. The clinical and imaging results were compared between Group A and Group B.

Results

After laminoplasty, both the mean VAS and mJOA scores improved significantly in Group A and Group B, the mJOA recovery rate of Group B was better than that of Group A (P < 0.05). The mean CGA and ROM decreased in Group A, but increased in Group B. MRI revealed that the ligamentum flavum of Group A was significantly thinner than that of Group B (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Because of the hypertrophic and folded ligamentum flavum compressing the dorsal spinal cord, patients with PCSM may maintain a compulsive kyphotic posture. After laminoplasty, the cervical sagittal curvature of these patients tend to be lordotic due to the release of dorsal spinal cord compression.

Bridging the cervicothoracic junction during posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical efficacy of crossing the cervicothoracic junction during posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

From October 2009 to October 2017, 46 consecutive patients with multilevel cervical OPLL underwent posterior cervical laminectomy and crossing the cervicothoracic junction fusion were obtained in the study. Their medical records were retrospectively collected. Cervical lordosis and cervical sagittal balance were used to assess radiographic outcomes. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), axial symptom, C5 root palsy, blood loss, and operation time were used to assess clinical outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 20.7 ± 8.3 months.

RESULTS

The operation time was 205.2 ± 39.8 min and the intraoperative blood loss was 352.2 ± 143.7 ml. Analysis of the final follow-up data showed significant differences in JOA score (P < 0.01), C2-C7 lordosis angle (P < 0.01), and C2-C7 SVA (P < 0.01). CT confirmed that grafted bone was completely fused in all patients and progression of OPLL was observed in two patients (4.3%) at final follow-up. No adjacent segment disease (ASD) or instrument failure occurred in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical laminectomy and crossing the cervicothoracic junction fusion are effective and safe methods to treat multilevel cervical OPLL. Randomized controlled studies compared constructs ending at cervical vertebrae or thoracic vertebrae are needed to confirm these results.

Long-term functional outcome of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a major global cause of spinal cord dysfunction. Surgical treatment is considered a safe and effective way to improve functional outcome, although information about long-term functional outcome remains scarce despite increasing longevity. The objective of this study was to describe functional outcome 10 years after surgery for DCM.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study was undertaken in a university-affiliated neurosurgery department. All patients who underwent surgery for DCM between 2008 and 2010 as part of the multicenter Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy International trial were included. Participants were approached for additional virtual assessment 10 years after surgery. Functional outcome was assessed according to the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA; scores 0-18) score at baseline and 1, 2, and 10 years after surgery. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as 1-, 2-, or 3-point improvement for mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy, respectively. Outcome was considered durable when stabilization or improvement after 2 years was maintained at 10 years. Self-evaluated effect of surgery was assessed using a 4-point Likert-like scale. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were compared between groups that worsened and improved or remained stable using descriptive statistics. Functional outcome was compared between various time points during follow-up with linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Of the 42 originally included patients, 37 participated at follow-up (11.9% loss to follow-up, 100% response rate). The mean patient age was 56.1 years, and 42.9% of patients were female. Surgical approaches were anterior (76.2%), posterior (21.4%), or posterior with fusion (2.4%). The mean follow-up was 10.8 years (range 10-12 years). The mean mJOA score increased significantly from 13.1 (SD 2.3) at baseline to 14.2 (SD 3.3) at 10 years (p = 0.01). A minimal clinically important difference was achieved in 54.1%, and stabilization of functional status was maintained in 75.0% in the long term. Patients who worsened were older (median 63 vs 52 years, p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (70.0% vs 25.9%, p < 0.01). A beneficial effect of surgery was self-reported by 78.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment for DCM results in satisfactory improvement of functional outcome that is maintained at 10-year follow-up.

Patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy exhibit neurophysiological improvement upon extension and flexion: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 1-year follow-up

Background

Cervical extension and flexion are presumably harmful to patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) because they worsen medullary compression visible on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Dynamic somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are an objective tool to measure the electrophysiological function of the spinal cord at different neck positions. In contrast to previous hypotheses, a considerable proportion of patients with DCM present improved SSEPs upon extension and flexion compared to a neutral position.

Methods

Patients with DCM who underwent preoperative dynamic SSEP examinations and subsequent decompression surgeries between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. We compared extension and flexion SSEPs with neutral SSEPs in each patient and classified them into extension-improved (EI) or extension-nonimproved (EN) and flexion-improved (FI) or flexion-nonimproved (FN) groups. Preoperative clinical evaluations, decompression surgical methods and one-year follow-up clinical data were recorded. Cervical spondylolisthesis and cervical alignment types were evaluated on plain cervical lateral radiographs. The number of stenotic segments, Mühle stenosis grade and disc degeneration stage of the most severe segment, and presence of ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and intramedullary T2 weighted imaging (T2WI) hyperintensity were evaluated on lateral and axial MRI. Data were compared between the EN and EN groups or FI and FN groups with T-tests, chi-square tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Prediction criteria were determined with logistic regression analyses.

Results

Forty-nine patients were included, and 9 (18.4%) and 11 (22.4%) showed improved extension and flexion SSEPs compared to their own neutral SSEPs, respectively. Interestingly, EI or FI patients had significantly better one-year postoperative mJOA recoveries than EN or FN patients (T-test, P < 0.001). Moreover, the disease duration (T-test, P = 0.024), involved segment number (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001), and cervical alignment type (chi-square test, P = 0.005) varied significantly between the EI and EN groups. The FI group presented a significantly higher Mühle stenosis grade than the FN group (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.038). Furthermore, ≤ 2 involved segments and straight or sigmoid cervical alignment were significant criteria predicting improved extension SSEPs (probability: 85.7%), while Mühle stenosis Grade 3 and disease duration ≤6 months were significant criteria predicting improved flexion SSEPs (probability: 85.7%).

Conclusions

Our findings provide evidence for neurophysiological improvement in patients with DCM at extension and flexion and its significance in predicting prognoses. Moreover, certain clinical and radiographic criteria may help predict neurophysiological improvement upon extension or flexion.

Trial registration

“[2020]151”. Retrospectively registered on April 30, 2020.

Effect of Minimally Invasive Selective Laminectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy on Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the slippage, sagittal alignment, and range of motion (ROM) after selective laminectomy (SL) in patients who had cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Clinical outcomes have been reported for both decompression and fusion surgeries for DS of the lumbar spine. However, only a few reports have examined cervical spine spondylolisthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 178 patients who underwent SL for CSM. Those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were excluded. Slippage >2 mm was defined as spondylolisthesis, and spondylolisthesis progression was defined as an additional displacement >2 mm on a neutral radiograph. The slippage, translational motion, C2-C7 angle, local kyphosis, and ROM were examined before and ≥2 years after surgery. Radiologic parameters were evaluated according to the slip direction and the number of laminae removed.

RESULTS

DS was observed in 29 patients (16.3%); 24 patients, comprising 9 and 15 in the anterolisthesis and retrolisthesis groups, respectively, were successfully followed up for more than 2 years. Preoperative and postoperative radiologic changes in slippage, translational motion, C2-C7 angle, local kyphosis, and ROM were not remarkable in either group regardless of the number of laminae removed. Revision surgery for the progression of DS and alignment deterioration was not required in any patient of either group.

CONCLUSIONS

SL does not affect DS, sagittal alignment, or ROM irrespective of the slip direction and the number of laminae removed, even after >2 years after surgery. Given the preservation of the posterior elements, SL may be an effective treatment for CSM with DS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Surgical Outcomes Following Laminectomy With Fusion Versus Laminectomy Alone in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

.: Post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

.: To compare clinical outcomes following laminectomy and fusion versus laminectomy alone in an international series of individuals suffering from degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

.: Significant controversy exists regarding the role of instrumented fusion in the context of posterior surgical decompression for DCM. A previous study comparing laminectomy and fusion with laminoplasty showed no differences in outcomes between groups after adjusting for preoperative characteristics.

METHODS

.: Based on the operation they received, 208 of the 757 patients prospectively enrolled in the AO Spine North America or International studies at 26 global sites were included in the present study. Twenty-two patients were treated with laminectomy alone and 186 received a laminectomy with fusion. Patients were evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale (mJOA), Nurick score, Neck Disability Index, and SF36 quality of life measure. Baseline and surgical characteristics were compared using a t test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categorical variables. A mixed model analytic approach was used to evaluate differences in outcomes at 24 months between patients undergoing laminectomy and fusion versus laminectomy alone.

RESULTS

.: Surgical cohorts were comparable in terms of preoperative patient characteristics. Patients undergoing laminectomy with instrumented fusion had a significantly longer operative duration (P < 0.0001, 231.44 vs. 107.10 min) but a comparable length of hospital stay. In terms of outcomes, patients treated with laminectomy with fusion exhibited clinically meaningful improvements (in functional impairmentΔmJOA = 2.48, ΔNurick = 1.19), whereas those who underwent a laminectomy without fusion did not (ΔmJOA = 0.78; ΔNurick = 0.29). There were significant differences between surgical cohorts in the change in mJOA and Nurick scores from preoperative to 24-months postoperative (mJOA: -1.70, P = 0.0266; Nurick: -0.90, P = 0.0241). The rate of perioperative complications was comparable (P = 0.879).

CONCLUSION

.: Our findings suggest that cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion is more effective than laminectomy alone at improving functional impairment in patients with DCM. These results warrant confirmation in larger prospective comparative studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

The safety and efficacy of anterior versus posterior decompression surgery in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The safety and efficacy of anterior and posterior decompression surgery in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) have not been validated in any prospective randomized trial.

METHODS

In this first prospective randomized trial, the patients who had symptoms or signs of DCM were randomly assigned to undergo either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or posterior laminectomy with or without fusion. The primary outcome measures were the change in the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Nurick myelopathy grade 1 year after surgery. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative and postoperative complications, hospital stay, and Odom's criteria. The follow-up period was at least 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients (mean age 53 ± 8.3 years, 72.3% men) underwent prospective randomization. There was a significantly better outcome in the NDI and VAS scores in the anterior group at 1 year (p < 0.05). Nurick myelopathy grading showed nonsignificant improvement using the posterior approach group (p = 0.79). The mean operative duration was significantly longer in the anterior group (p < 0.001). No significant difference in postoperative complications was found, except postoperative dysphagia was significantly higher in the anterior group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative patient satisfaction (Odom's criteria) (p = 0.52). The mean hospital stay was significantly longer in the posterior group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with multilevel DCM, the anterior approach was significantly better regarding postoperative pain, NDI, and hospital stay, while the posterior approach was significantly better in terms of postoperative dysphagia and operative duration.

The effect of minimally invasive dorsal cervical decompression for myelopathy on spinal alignment and range of motion

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive dorsal cervical decompression (miDCD) has been reported as a novel alternative to open dorsal decompression techniques such as laminectomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy and fusion. Only limited data have been presented regarding the effects of a minimally invasive approach on cervical motion and alignment. The object of the current study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of radiographic outcomes following miDCD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients who had undergone miDCD for myelopathy were included. Exclusion criteria included prior cervical spine surgery, prior cervical spine fracture, fusion of the cervical spine during miDCD, and/or acute spinal cord injury. Analysis of x-rays included the following data elements: degrees of flexion, degrees of extension, and total range of motion; C2-C7 angle as a measure of cervical lordosis; C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis; effective lordosis; and C7 slope. Patient reported outcome measures included neck Visual Analog Score (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS), Nurick score, and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Myelopathy scale (mJOA).

RESULTS

Pre-operative to post-operative comparisons of all radiographic parameters - including total range of motion, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, effective lordosis, and C7 slope angle - remained stable. Several clinical outcomes demonstrated statistical improvement, namely neck VAS, Nurick score, mJOA, NDI, and SF-12 PCS.

CONCLUSIONS

miDCD can maintain cervical range of motion and alignment better than traditional laminectomy or laminoplasty techniques.

Extensor muscle-preserving laminectomy in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy compared with laminoplasty

Background

Laminectomy and laminoplasty are popularly used in posterior cervical spine surgery but still have involved complications. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of microscope-assisted extensor muscle-preserving laminectomy (MA-EMPL) and open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

Methods

A prospective study was designed to enroll twenty patients with MCSM underwent MA-EMPL, and recruit twenty-four patients with MCSM received ODLP (control). Radiographic measurements, outcome indicators including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue score (VAS) were used to evaluate technical effectiveness. Surgical complications were documented to assess technical safety.

Results

Postoperative cervical curvature index and range of neck motion (ROM) were not significantly changed except ROM in ODLP group. Postoperative JOA score and VAS in both groups showed improvements at final follow-up. There was no statistical difference in postoperative neurological recovery rates between two groups (67.6%±17.8% vs. 70.15%±19.6%, P=0.632). However, VAS was significantly lower at postoperative 1 month in MA-EMPL group compared with ODLP group (P<0.001). The incidences of C5 palsy were 0 vs. 16.7% between MA-EMPL group and ODLP group. There was no axial symptom occurred in MA-EMPL group while six patients in ODLP group (0 vs. 25%, P=0.049). In addition, the mean blood loss and hospital stay were lesser in MA-EMPL group compared with ODLP group (P<0.001, P=0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

MA-EMPL is an effective, safe and minimally invasive method in treatment of MCSM. Compared with ODLP, MA-EMPL has advantage to decrease intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative VAS and axial symptom, as well as preserve postoperative ROM.

Cervical Laminectomy With or Without Lateral Mass Instrumentation: A Comparison of Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

BACKGROUND

Cervical decompressive laminectomy is a common posterior approach for addressing multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, there is a concern that cervical laminectomy can lead to kyphotic deformity with subsequent neurological decline. In this context, cervical laminectomy with fusion using lateral mass instrumentation has become increasingly utilized with the aim of reducing the risk of developing postoperative kyphotic deformity, which is thought to predispose to poorer neurological outcomes in the long term.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the evidence for stand-alone cervical laminectomy with laminectomy with posterior fusion in terms of clinical outcomes and the incidence of adverse events, particularly the development of postoperative cervical kyphosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Initial Medline search using MeSH terms yielded 226 articles, 23 of which were selected. An additional PubMed search and the reference list of individual papers were utilized to identify the remaining papers of relevance.

RESULTS

Cervical laminectomy both with and without fusion offers effective decompression for symptomatic multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The incidence of postlaminectomy kyphosis is lower following posterior fusion; however, there seems to be no clinical-radiologic correlation given that patients who develop postoperative kyphosis often do not progress to clinical myelopathy. Furthermore, there are specific additional risks of posterior instrumentation that need to be considered.

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected patients with normal preoperative cervical sagittal alignment, stand-alone cervical laminectomy may offer acceptably low rates of postoperative kyphosis. In patients with preoperative loss of cervical lordosis and/or kyphosis, posterior fusion is recommended to reduce the risk of progression to postoperative kyphotic deformity, bearing in mind that radiologic evidence of kyphosis may not necessarily correlate with poorer clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the specific risks associated with posterior fusion (instrumentation failure, pseudarthrosis, infection, C5 nerve root palsy, and vertebral artery injury) need to be considered and weighed up against potential benefits.

Postoperative Walking Ability of Non-ambulatory Cervical Myelopathy Patients

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify the postoperative improvement of walking ability and prognostic factors in nonambulatory patients with cervical myelopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many researchers have reported the surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy. However, regarding severe gait disturbance,, it has not been clarified yet how much improvement can be expected.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-one nonambulatory patients with cervical myelopathy were treated surgically and followed for an average of 3 years. Walking ability was graded according to the lower-extremity function subscore (L/E subscore) in Japanese Orthopedic Association score. We divided patients based on preoperative L/E subscores: group A, L/E subscore of 1 point (71 patients); and group B, 0 or 0.5 point (60 patients). The postoperative walking ability was graded by L/E subscore: excellent, ≥2 points; good, 1.5 points; fair, 1 point; and poor, 0.5 or 0 points. We compared preoperative and postoperative scores. The cutoff value of disease duration providing excellent improvement was investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 patients were graded as excellent (38.2%), and 21 patients were graded as good (16.0%). In group B, 17 patients (28.3%) were graded as excellent. Seventeen patients who were graded as excellent had shorter durations of myelopathic symptoms and/or gait disturbance (7.9 and 3.8 months respectively) than the others (29.5 and 8.9 months, respectively) (P < 0.05). Receiver-operating characteristic curve showed that the optimal cutoff values of the duration of myelopathic symptoms and gait disturbance providing excellent improvement were 3 and 2 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Even if the patients were nonambulatory, 28.3% of them became able to walk without support after operation. If a patient becomes nonambulatory within 3 months from the onset of myelopathy or 2 months from the onset of gait disturbance, surgical treatment should be performed immediately to raise the possibility to improve stable gait.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Long-Term Sustainability of Functional Improvement Following Central Corpectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine predictors of long-term outcome and sustainability of initial functional improvement in patients undergoing corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are limited data on the predictors of outcome and sustainability of initial functional improvement on long-term follow-up after cervical corpectomy.

METHODS

We studied the functional outcome at more than 1-year follow-up after central corpectomy in 352 patients with CSM or OPLL. Functional status was evaluated with the Nurick grading system. Analysis was directed at identifying factors associated with both improvement in functional status and the achievement of a "cure" (improvement to a follow-up Nurick grade of 0 or 1). A survival analysis was performed to identify factors associated with sustained functional improvement in patients with serial follow-up evaluations.

RESULTS

Nurick grade improved from 3.2 ± 0.1 to 1.9 ± 0.1 over a mean follow-up period of 57.1 months (range 12-228 mo). On multivariate analysis, age ≥50 years (P = 0.008) and symptom duration ≥1 year (P < 0.001) were negatively associated with functional improvement by ≥1 Nurick grade. Independent factors negatively associated with "cure" after surgery included age 50 years or older (P = 0.005), preoperative Nurick grade of 4 or higher (P < 0.001) and symptom duration of 1 or more years (P < 0.001). Early improvement in functional status was maintained in 90.5% and 76.3% of patients at 5 and 10 years follow-up, respectively. On survival analysis, patients with shorter preoperative symptom duration (<1 yr) were more likely to demonstrate sustained improvement in functional status after surgery (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Initial gains in functional status after central corpectomy for CSM and OPLL are maintained in more than 75% of patients at 10 years after surgery. Overall, the most favorable long-term outcomes are achieved in younger patients who present early and with good preoperative functional status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Use of a Pediatric Craniotome Drill for Cervical and Thoracic Spine Decompression: Safety and Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Laminectomy, using a high-speed drill with an unprotected cutting drill bit, can be rapid and effective, but it has been associated with known complications. Another technique uses a pediatric craniotome drill with the footplate attachment. At present, there are no studies comparing clinical outcomes between these 2 stated decompressive techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted at a single institution. Two cohorts of patients were considered based on the technical method of laminectomy for decompression. One group had decompression with utilization of a high-speed drill, whereas the other group had decompression with a pediatric craniotome drill with a footplate attachment. The outcomes from each group were compared based on the length of operation, estimated blood loss, and associated complications.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were included in the final analysis. Forty-five of the patients underwent laminectomy using a footplate and 46, using a high-speed drill. The footplate group was associated with significantly shorter operative time (159 vs. 205 minutes; P = 0.008). In addition, the footplate technique demonstrated less estimated blood loss (254 vs. 349 mL), and less incidence of durotomies (2.2% vs. 10.9%); however, neither of these 2 outcomes achieved statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being an older technique, there was a shorter operative time in the footplate group without increased blood loss or incidence of durotomy. Although comparable results are operator dependent, this technique is a safe alternative for performing cervical and thoracic laminectomies.