Sagittal spinopelvic alignment in 654 degenerative spondylolisthesis

Preoperative radiographical degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis does not affect clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is sometimes found in preoperative spine radiographs before total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, whether DLS affects the clinical outcomes of THA and whether the slip is improved by THA remain unclear. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of THA in patients with DLS and change in the slip percentage of DLS after THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 369 patients who underwent primary THA due to hip osteoarthritis between December 2015 and February 2022. The patients were classified into the DLS or non-DLS group by evaluating preoperative whole-spine radiographs in the standing position. Preoperative sagittal spinal parameters, preoperative and 1-year postoperative Harris hip score, Oxford hip score, and slip percentage of DLS were evaluated. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with DLS.

RESULTS

Of the 369 patients, 101 (27.4%) were classified into the DLS group. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (odds ratio (OR) per unit: 1.04, p < 0.01) and pelvic incidence (PI) (OR per unit: 1.04, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with DLS. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes between the DLS and non-DLS groups were not significantly different. The preoperative and postoperative percentages of slip in the DLS group did not change significantly from 16.9% ± 6.2% to 16.7% ± 6.7% (p = 0.47). Patients with slip progression ≥ 2.5% of slip percentage were 19 (18.8%), who were younger (p = 0.02) and had higher PI (p = 0.01) and sacral slope (p = 0.03) than those with slip improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and PI were significantly associated factors for DLS. The slip was not improved after THA. The clinical outcomes of THA in the DLS group were not affected. Longer-term follow-up studies are essential to elucidate the hip-spine relationship.

The triadic relationship between spinal posture, loading, and degeneration

Introduction

Degenerative changes in the lumbar spine may affect many structures, among them the intervertebral discs and the facet joints. The individual load distribution within the spine linked to posture and mass distribution is a probable cause of disease. This study had a dual aim: first, to systematically summarize previously reported associations between sagittal balance parameters and the occurrence of lumbar spine degeneration. Second, to complement these insights with additional biomechanical findings meant to elucidate the link between spine load and alignment as well as selected demographic descriptors.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed to identify clinical studies that quantified the association between spinal alignment and the occurrence of disc herniation, disc degeneration, facet joint degeneration, and spondylolisthesis. Further, a previously published musculoskeletal model was used to link sagittal spinal alignment and subject characteristics to joint loading within the lumbar spine for a cohort of 144 subjects.

Results

The literature review yielded 49 publications evaluating the relationship between spinal alignment and the occurrence of pathologies in the lumbar spine. The results indicate that a straight spine might negatively affect the health status of the intervertebral disc, likely because of a lack of damping and associated high compressive loads. These loads further show a major dependence on body weight. On the other hand, facet degeneration and spondylolisthesis may be linked to higher anterior-posterior shear forces acting on the relevant spinal structures because of a generally more sagittally curved spine. A straight lumbar spine is more likely to stress the disc, whereas highly curved spines with a high pelvic incidence are more likely to stress the posterior structures. The biggest influencing factors on the resulting force and consequently potentially the wear of the anatomical structures are the intervertebral inclination from an anatomical point of view and the weight from a demographic point of view.

Discussion

Information concerning spinal loading resulting from spinal alignment and body descriptors could impact both conservative treatment and operative planning for patients afflicted by spine disease through targeted changes in posture.

Does Adherence to Treatment Guidelines from the Ghailane-Gille Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar Spine Impact Surgical Outcomes? A Match-Mismatch Study

Background/Objectives: satisfactory sagittal alignment when treating degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine (DSLS) may produce better clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to treatment focused solely on isolated segments when indicated. Ghailane et al. proposed a treatment guideline based on their classification system. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adherence to Ghailane-Gille (GG) treatment guidelines on surgical outcomes in patients with DSLS. Methods: A monocentric retrospective cohort analysis was performed from 2021 to September 2024. Data were collected from patients treated for DSLS, covering the period from baseline to one-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on GG treatment guidelines: the "Match group" (patients who underwent surgery following GG guidelines) and the "Mismatch group" (patients who did not adhere to these guidelines). Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and operative parameters were collected and compared between groups. Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with 52 in the Match group and 28 in the Mismatch group. At baseline, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score demonstrated significant variation among classification subtypes and a positive correlation. The Match group exhibited a significant reduction in ODI scores one year postoperatively and maintained high levels of satisfaction; no significant intraoperative differences were noted. Additionally, patients in the Mismatch group were more frequently classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III compared to the Match group (70% vs. 30%), suggesting clinicians' hesitance to fully implement GG guidelines in aggressive treatment strategies for those patients. Conclusions: Adhering to the GG treatment guidelines for restoring sagittal alignment in DSLS patients is associated with decreased ODI scores regardless of age, ensuring patient satisfaction at one-year follow-up. This approach could potentially benefit ASA III patients as well.

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis; slippage reduction can be a risk factor for adjacent segment disease

PURPOSE

Several risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) have been reported. High pelvic incidence (PI) has been identified as risk factors for L4 anterior slip in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Correcting the slip with L4-L5 fixation merely restores the lumbar alignment, but the PI itself remains unchanged. We hypothesized that the fused L4 vertebral body might continue to be subject to the slip-inducing force, even after fixation, and that slip correction might be a cause of ASD. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk factors for adjacent ASD following single-segment PLIF in patients with L4 spondylolisthesis, with a particular focus on the reduction of vertebral body slippage.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion at the L4-L5 level for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis were investigated. Patients were divided into two groups: the ASD group (n = 12) and the non-ASD group (n = 40). %Slip before surgery and at follow-up, Δ%Slip (Δ%Slip = %Slip before surgery-%Slip at follow-up), L4-L5 interbody height, and L4-L5 lordosis angle were evaluated.

RESULTS

Stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed Δ%Slip to be a risk factor for ASD (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.43, p = 0.015). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff value for Δ%Slip was 7.3% (sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 67.5%, and area under the curve = 0.725).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the reduction of L4 slippage may contribute to the development of ASD in patients with L4 spondylolisthesis.

Sagittal alignment of the spine and lumbar disc herniation in young adults: A historical, case-control study

OBJECTIVES

This study hypothesizes that the spinopelvic sagittal alignment can influence the development of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). To investigate this relationship, the spinopelvic data of surgical LDH patients was compared to that of a healthy historical control group.

METHODS

The spinopelvic data of LDH patients aged 15-45 years, undergoing herniated disc surgery (L4-L5/L5-S1) from 2015 to 2019, was compared to that from healthy controls reported by Roussouly et al. Sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and Roussouly classification (spinal curves type 1-4) were assessed with full body radiographs in a standing weight-bearing position (EOS® system) using KEOPS software. The prevalence of spine types (1-4) were evaluated in both groups, with subgroup analysis based on herniation level. Proportions were compared using Fisher's exact tests, means by Student's t-tests, and confidence intervals for odds ratios (OR) using the exact conditional tail interval (ECTI) method.

RESULTS

Spinopelvic data from 350 patients (190 LDH/160 healthy controls) showed that LDH patients had a significantly higher prevalence of Roussouly type 2 spines ("flat spine") (27.9% vs. 11.2%, OR 3.04, p = 0.001). The LDH group also exhibited lower mean PI (-3.0°, p = 0.009), significantly lower mean SS (-6.9°, p < 0.001), lower lumbar lordosis angle (-10.6°, p < 0.001), and higher thoracic kyphosis angle (+3.6°, p < 0.001). The ratio of OR (2.73, p = 0.01) indicated that type 2 spines pose a stronger risk for LDH surgery at L5-S1 compared to L4-L5.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients <45 years old undergoing surgery at L4-L5/L5-S1 showed a threefold higher prevalence of type 2 Roussouly spines, compared to a healthy control group, suggesting a potential role of "flat spine" and lower PI in the development of LDH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

Is There a Relation Between High Pelvic Incidence and Sagittal Angle of Posterior Lumbar Facets?

BACKGROUND

In recent years, several studies have shown the presence of a linear correlation between the pelvic incidence (PI) and spondylolisthesis. However, no study has attempted to investigate a potential association between facet sagittal angle and spinopelvic parameters, especially PI in the normal population.

METHODS

Abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans were collected. Inclusion criteria included age less than 40 years and CT done for non-orthopedic diagnostic purposes. All cases with any spinal pathology were excluded. Spinopelvic and lumbar spinal parameters were collected using the KEOPS software (SMAIO, Lyon, France), and the facet sagittal angle were evaluated on axial CT images from L1-L2 to L5-S1 using the institution PACS system (GE Centricity, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

A total of 450 patients' imaging were analyzed, with a mean age of 31.3 years (±4.9). Facet sagittal angle was found to be significantly correlated to an increase in PI but only at the L5-S1 level (odds ratio = 2.3). The effect of sex on sagittal angle of facet joints was found to be non-significant compared with high PI. Finally, at the L5-S1 level, facet tropism was associated with a higher PI but was not found to play a direct role in the angle of facet joints.

CONCLUSIONS

The PI seems to be correlated to the other spondylolisthesis risk factors: facet tropism and female sex. It carries the heaviest load in the progression towards sagittally oriented facet joints, which might lead to segmental instability and eventual spinal pathologies.

Segmental Lordosis Restoration During Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Fusion: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

The science of spinal alignment has progressed rapidly since Jean Doubousset described the cone of economy in the 1970s. It is now clearly established that global and regional spinal alignment are associated with improved patient-reported outcome and rates of success of lumbar spinal fusion. Evidence has now emerged that segmental level-by-level alignment is also associated with positive patient outcomes. As such, restoring sagittal alignment matched to spinopelvic morphology during degenerative lumbar surgery can optimize surgical outcomes by preventing adjacent segment pathology. This review focuses on the vital importance of spinal alignment in different spinal conditions, provides a guide for measurement of spinopelvic parameters, and outlines literature regarding lumbar restoration in degenerative spinal fusion.

Alignment considerations in degenerative spinal conditions: A narrative review

Background

With an aging population, degenerative spinal diseases are contributing significantly to the healthcare's burden. Spinal alignment in the context of adult spinal deformities has become an important domain of research.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of the latest considerations in spinal alignment within the context of degenerative spinal conditions, discussed current strategies for morphological assessment and finally identified potential areas for future research.

Results

This review reported that degenerative spinal conditions lead to a complex disruption of spinal alignment. It also highlighted the importance of spino-pelvic alignment with specific attention to compensatory mechanisms that occur in response to spinal deformities. Emerging technologies including Artificial Intelligence and epigenetics are showing promises in terms of patient care.

Conclusions

Understanding spinal alignment in degenerative conditions underscores the importance of dynamic and individualized assessments. Future research should integrate emerging technologies along with traditional clinical practices in order to optimize patient outcomes and minimize complications for patients suffering from degenerative spinal diseases.

The L3 Flexion Angle Predicts Failure of Non-Operative Management in Patients with Tandem Spondylolithesis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Determine impact of standard/novel spinopelvic parameters on global sagittal imbalance, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, and clinical outcomes in patients with multi-level, tandem degenerative spondylolisthesis (TDS).

METHODS

Single institution analysis; 49 patients with TDS. Demographics, PROMIS and ODI scores collected. Radiographic measurements-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, sagittal L3 flexion angle (L3FA) and L3 sagittal distance (L3SD). Stepwise linear multivariate regression performed using full length cassettes to identify demographic and radiographic factors predictive of aberrant SVA (≥5 cm). Receiver operative curve (ROC) analysis used to identify cutoffs for lumbar radiographic values independently predictive of SVA ≥5 cm. Univariate comparisons of patient demographics, (HRQoL) scores and surgical indication were performed around this cutoff using two-way Student's t-tests and Fisher's exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients with increased L3FA had worse ODI (P = .006) and increased rate of failing non-operative management (P = .02). L3FA (OR 1.4, 95% CI) independently predicted of SVA ≥5 cm (sensitivity and specifity of 93% and 92%). Patients with SVA ≥5 cm had lower LL (48.7 ± 19.5 vs 63.3 ± 6.9 mm, P < .021), higher L3SD (49.3 ± 12.9 vs 28.8 ± 9.2, P < .001) and L3FA (11.6 ± 7.9 vs -3.2 ± 6.1, P < .001) compared to patients with SVA ≤5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased flexion of L3, which is easily measured by the novel lumbar parameter L3FA, predicts global sagittal imbalance in TDS patients. Increased L3FA is associated with worse performance on ODI, and failure of non-operative management in patients with TDS.

Radiographic predictors of reaching minimal clinically important difference following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to (1) compare sagittal alignment between patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) who reached or missed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion surgery (LFS) and (2) identify radiographic predictors associated with MCID achievement in DLS patients.

METHODS

A total of 91 single-level DLS patients who underwent LFS and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were enrolled in this study. The assessed radiographic parameters included thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL), slip percentage, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis. Changes in radiographic parameters were determined by subtracting the preoperative value from the final follow-up measurement. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for both back and leg pain. MCID values were set at 10 points for ODI, 2.1 points for VAS back pain, and 2.8 points for VAS leg pain. Patients were assigned to the reached MCID (rMCID) and missed MCID (mMCID) groups based on the postoperative (post-op) recovery of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, 68.1% (62/91), 72.5% (66/91), and 76.9% (70/91) of patients reached MCID for ODI, VAS back pain, and VAS leg pain, respectively. Concerning ODI, the rMCID group exhibited higher post-op LL (47.93° vs. 42.95°, P = 0.044), higher post-op SLL (17.08° vs. 14.41°, P = 0.032), higher post-op SS (34.46° vs. 30.63°, P = 0.027), higher ∆LL (5.90° vs. 2.44°, P = 0.017), higher ∆SLL (4.63° vs. - 1.03°, P < 0.001), higher ∆SS (4.76° vs. 1.23°, P = 0.002), lower post-op PT/PI (36.95% vs. 42.01%, P = 0.049), lower ∆PT (- 3.71° vs. 1.05°, P < 0.001), lower ∆PT/PI (- 7.45% vs. 1.97%, P < 0.001), and lower ∆PI-LL (- 5.43° vs. - 3.71°, P = 0.011) than the mMCID group. Regarding VAS back pain, the rMCID group showed higher post-op SLL (17.06° vs. 14.05°, P = 0.021), higher post-op SS (34.34° vs. 30.33°, P = 0.027), higher ∆SLL (3.93° vs. - 0.09°, P < 0.001), and lower ∆PT (- 2.91° vs. - 0.30°, P = 0.039) than the mMCID group. For VAS leg pain, higher ∆SLL (3.55° vs. 0.41°, P = 0.003) was observed in the rMCID group than in the mMCID group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher ∆SLL, higher ∆SS, and higher post-op SS were independent predictors for the achievement of MCID in patients with DLS.

CONCLUSION

DLS patients who reached MCID following LFS demonstrated improved post-op spinopelvic alignment. Higher ∆SLL, higher ∆SS, and higher post-op SS were the critical parameters associated with MCID achievement in patients with DLS.

Sagittal Alignment in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Surgical Planning

➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis.➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases.➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine.➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.

Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: role of sagittal alignment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L4-5 level.

METHODS

Patients with untreated degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5 were retrospectively identified from the clinical practice of spine surgeons at an academic medical center. All patients had standing X-rays that were reviewed by the senior surgeon to confirm the presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. Radiographs were analyzed for the following: lumbar lordosis (LL), lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1; LLL), L5-S1 lordosis, pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT). From these measurements, lumbar distribution index (LLL/LL × 100; LDI), ideal lumbar lordosis (PI × 0.62 + 29; ILL), PI-LL mismatch, and relative lumbar lordosis (LL-ILL; RLL) were calculated. These parameters were used to evaluate the sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Normal alignment was defined based on previous studies and clinical experience.

RESULTS

117 participants met inclusion criteria, with an average age of 67.2 years. The majority of the cohort demonstrated hypolordotic sagittal alignment of the L5-S1 segment when assessed in relation to ILL, PI, and LL (73.5%, 61.5%, and 50.4% respectively). Evaluation of the lower lumbar spine (L4-S1) demonstrated normal sagittal alignment when evaluated via LDI and LLL (65%, 52.1%, respectively), suggesting the presence of compensatory hyperextension at L4-5 in response to the L5-S1 hypolordosis. Consequently, normal sagittal alignment of the regional lumbar spine was maintained when evaluated using LL, PI-LL mismatch, and RLL (51.3%, 47%, and 62.4% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that there is a high incidence of relative hypolordosis at the L5-S1 level among patients who present with degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. The L5-S1 hypolordosis is associated with L4-5 hyperlordosis, such that the lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1; LLL) and regional lumbar lordosis (LL) are still within normal range. It is probable that L5-S1 hypolordosis was the initial pathologic event that incited compensatory L4-5 hyperlordosis, which in turn may have led to facet degeneration and laxity, and eventually to development of spondylolisthesis.

A Retrospective Study of the Effect of Spinopelvic Parameters on Fatty Infiltration in Paraspinal Muscles in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

The effect on fat infiltration (FI) of paraspinal muscles in degenerative lumbar spinal diseases has been demonstrated except for spinopelvic parameters. The present study is to identify the effect of spinopelvic parameters on FI of paraspinal muscle (PSM) and psoas major muscle (PMM) in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study of 160 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and lumbar stenosis (LSS) who had lateral full-spine x-ray and lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging was conducted. PSM and PMM FIs were defined as the ratio of fat to its muscle cross-sectional area. The FIs were compared among patients with different pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence (PI), respectively.

RESULTS

The PSM FI correlated significantly with pelvic parameters in DLS patients, but not in LSS patients. The PSM FI in pelvic retroversion (PT > 25°) was 0.54 ± 0.13, which was significantly higher in DLS patients than in normal pelvis (0.41 ± 0.14) and pelvic anteversion (PT < 5°) (0.34 ± 0.12). The PSM FI of DLS patients with large PI ( > 60°) was 0.50 ± 0.13, which was higher than those with small ( < 45°) and normal PI (0.37 ± 0.11 and 0.36 ± 0.13). However, the PSM FI of LSS patients didn't change significantly with PT or PI. Moreover, the PMM FI was about 0.10-0.15, which was significantly lower than the PSM FI, and changed with PT and PI in a similar way of PSM FI with much less in magnitude.

CONCLUSION

FI of the PSMs increased with greater pelvic retroversion or larger pelvic incidence in DLS patients, but not in LSS patients.

Association between spinopelvic alignment and the development of degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic parameter may result in the development of degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, previous studies show conflicting results; some found a significant relationship of some of these parameters with degenerative spondylolisthesis, while others did not. Previously, there was no meta-analysis regarding the association between spinopelvic alignment and degenerative spondylolisthesis. This meta-analysis aims to determine the association between spinopelvic alignment and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are based on the selected item reporting method for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Methodological quality is based on the cross-sectional checklist of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) quality check methodology and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for cohort studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Rev-Man 5.3. Subgroup analyses were performed based on ethnicity and study design to ascertain racial relations and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 3236 articles were obtained. Of these, we found that pelvic incidence (mean difference [MD] = 11.94 [1.81-22.08], P = 0.02), pelvic tilt (MD = 4.47 [0.81-8.14]), P = 0.02), and age (MD = 11.94 [1.81-22.08], P = 0.02) were associated with the development of degenerative spondylolisthesis.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis proves that pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and age are associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Differences in Lumbopelvic Alignment in Adolescent Male Soccer Players With Bilateral and Unilateral Lumbar Bone Stress Injuries: An MRI Evaluation

Background

Differences in the physical characteristics of bilateral and unilateral lumbar bone stress injuries (BSIs) are unknown.

Purpose

To compare bilateral and unilateral lumbar BSIs in adolescent male soccer players, with a focus on lumbopelvic alignment.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 78 players (age range, 12-15 years) from a local soccer club who had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations were included in the study. Lumbopelvic alignment and lumbar BSI were evaluated using short-tau inversion recovery and 3-dimensional LAVA on 3-T MRI; lumbar BSI was defined as the presence of bone marrow edema and/or the complete and incomplete fracture in the pars region on the MRI. Pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic outflare angles were assessed on the kicking and pivoting sides, and asymmetry for each parameter was calculated by subtracting the kicking side from the pivoting side. In addition, the lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), and SS relative to LL (calculated by subtracting LL from the SS) were assessed. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare lumbopelvic alignment in players with bilateral BSI, unilateral BSI, or no abnormal findings (controls).

Results

No significant differences were found regarding lumbopelvic alignment between the players with bilateral versus unilateral lumbar BSI. PT asymmetry was significantly greater in both players with bilateral lumbar BSI and unilateral lumbar BSI compared with controls (P = .018 and P = .016, respectively). In addition, SS relative to LL was significantly greater in players with bilateral lumbar BSI compared with controls (P < .001).

Conclusion

Although there were no significant lumbopelvic alignment differences between bilateral and unilateral BSI, players with bilateral BSI exhibited increased sacral anterior tilt relative to the LL, and the pelvis was more posterior on the pivoting side than on the kicking side in both players with bilateral BSI and unilateral BSI. Our results suggest that lumbopelvic alignment assessment may contribute to the management strategy for players with lumbar BSI and to the identification of players at high risk of lumbar BSI.

Functional outcomes correlate with sagittal spinal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a debilitating condition associated with poor preoperative functional status. Surgical intervention has been shown to improve functional outcomes in this population though the optimal surgical procedure remains controversial. The importance of maintaining and/or improving sagittal and pelvic spinal balance parameters has received increasing interest in the recent DLS literature. However, little is known about the radiographic parameters most associated with improved functional outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for DLS.

PURPOSE

To identify the effect of postoperative sagittal spinal alignment on functional outcome after DLS surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two-hundred forty-three patients in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) prospective DLS study database.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline and 1-year postoperative leg and back pain on the 10-point Numeric Rating Scale and baseline and 1-year postoperative disability on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

METHODS

All enrolled study patients had a DLS diagnosis and underwent decompression in isolation or with posterolateral or interbody fusion. Global and regional radiographic alignment parameters were measured at baseline and 1-year postoperatively including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (LL). Both univariate and multiple linear regression was used to assess for the association between radiographic parameters and patient-reported functional outcomes with adjustment for possible confounding baseline patient factors.

RESULTS

Two-hundred forty-three patients were available for analysis. Among participants, the mean age was 66 with 63% (153/243) female with the primary surgical indication of neurogenic claudication in 197/243 (81%) of patients. Worse pelvic incidence-LL mismatch was correlated with more severe disability [ODI, 0.134, p<.05), worse leg pain (0.143, p<.05) and worse back pain (0.189, p<.001) 1-year postoperatively. These associations were maintained after adjusting for age, BMI, gender, and preoperative presence of depression (ODI, R2 0.179, β, 0.25, 95% CI 0.08, 0.42, p=.004; back pain R2 0.152 (β, 0.05, 95% CI 0.022, 0.07, p<.001; leg pain score R2 0.059, β, 0.04, 95% CI 0.008, 0.07, p=.014). Likewise, reduction of LL was associated with worse disability (ODI, R2 0.168, β, 0.04, 95% CI -0.39, -0.02, p=.027) and worse back pain (R2 0.135, β, -0.04, 95% CI -0.06, -0.01, p=.007). Worsened SVA correlated with worse patient reported functional outcomes (ODI, R2 0.236, β, 0.12, 95% CI 0.05, 0.20, p=.001). Similarly, an increase (worsening) in SVA resulted in a worse NRS back pain (R2 0.136, β, 0.01, 95% CI .001, 0.02, p=.029) and worse NRS leg pain (R2 0.065, β, 0.02, 95% CI 0.002, 0.02, p=.018) scores regardless of surgery type.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative emphasis on regional and global spinal alignment parameters should be considered in order to optimize functional outcome in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treatment.

Bivertebral pedicle-supralaminar autostable claw for proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in early-onset scoliosis

BACKGROUND

The various methods for the proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) are associated with high rates of mechanical complications related to material failure or proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). The bivertebral autostable claw (BAC) has been proven reliable in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis but has not been assessed when used with magnetic growing rods. The objective of this study was to describe the operative technique and outcomes of BAC proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in children with EOS.

HYPOTHESIS

The BAC provides stable and effective proximal fixation in children with early-onset scoliosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 24 patients who had surgery in 2015-2019 for early-onset scoliosis with magnetic growing rod implantation and BAC proximal fixation. Radiological variables were measured in the coronal and sagittal planes before surgery, during the early postoperative period (<3months) and at last follow-up (≥2years).

RESULTS

No neurological complications were recorded. At last follow-up, four patients had radiological PJK, including one patient with clinical PJK due to material failure.

DISCUSSION

BAC proximal fixation is both effective and sufficiently stable (4.2% pull-out) to withstand the forces applied during distraction sessions and daily activities in children with EOS. Moreover, the polyaxial connecting rods ensure better BAC adaptation to the local proximal kyphosis, which is often marked in this population.

CONCLUSION

The BAC is a reliable proximal fixation device that is well-suited to magnetic growing rod fixation in children with EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational cohort study.

Factors Predisposing to The Formation of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis-A Narrative Review

The relationship between various factors predisposing to the formation of spondylolisthesis, including degenerative spondylolisthesis, has been analyzed by many authors. However, not all observations are consistent. In this review, we identified factors whose impact on the prevalence of spondylolisthesis was most often mentioned in the literature. These included gender, age, bone mineral density, ethnic origin, and oophorectomy. The results were inclusive in terms of physical activity, pregnancy status, and use of hormone replacement therapy. Associations between diabetes and smoking were very poorly marked. The literature so far has identified a number of factors significantly affecting the incidence of degenerative spondylolisthesis. These include age, gender, body weight, ethnic origin, bone mineral density, and hormonal balance. Radiological parameters, which include iliac crest, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis, may also be of great importance for assessing changes in the occurrence and progression. However, the authors do not agree on the real significance of individual factors. The aim of this review was to identify the factors predisposing to the formation of degenerative spondylolisthesis, the importance of which has been suggested in the current literature. The systematization of knowledge in this field can allow a more accurate adjustment of the treatment plan for each patient affected by this condition.

Characteristics of Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Severe and Rigid Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

There has been increasing concern about the importance of sagittal alignment in the evaluation and treatment of spinal scoliosis. However, recent studies have only focused on patients with mild to moderate scoliosis. To date, little is known about the sagittal alignment in patients with severe and rigid scoliosis (SRS). This study was performed to evaluate the sagittal alignment in patients with SRS, and to analyze how it was altered after corrective surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included 58 patients with SRS who underwent surgery from January 2015 to April 2020. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed, and the sagittal parameters mainly included thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacrum slope (SS), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). The sagittal balance state was evaluated according to whether the PI minus the LL (PI-LL) was less than 9°, and the patients were divided into thoracic hyperkyphosis and normal groups based on whether the TK exceeded 40°. The Student's t test, Pearson's test, and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to compare related parameters between the different groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 2.8 years. Preoperatively, the mean PI was 43.6 ± 9.4°, and the mean LL was 65.2 ± 13.9°. Sixty-nine percent of patients showed sagittal imbalance, and they showed larger TK and LL values and smaller PI and SVA values than those with sagittal balance. Additionally, most patients (44/58) presented with thoracic hyperkyphosis; this group had smaller PI and SVA values than the normal patients. Patients with syringomyelia-associated scoliosis were more likely to present with thoracic hyperkyphosis. The TK and LL values were significantly decreased, and 45% of patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance recovered after surgery. These patients had a larger PI (46.4 ± 9.0° vs 38.3 ± 8.8°, P = 0.003) and a smaller TK (25.5 ± 5.2° vs 36.3 ± 8.0°, P = 0.000) at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative sagittal imbalance appears in the majority of SRS patients, accounting for approximately 69% of our cohort. Patients with small PI values or syringomyelia-associated scoliosis were more likely to present with thoracic hyperkyphosis. Sagittal imbalance can generally be corrected by surgery, except in patients with a PI less than 39°. To achieve good postoperative sagittal alignment, we recommend controlling the TK to within 31°.

The effect of sagittal alignment, coronal balance, and segmental stability on preoperative patient-reported outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between spinal alignment and preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and to identify the independent risk factors for worse preoperative PROs.

METHODS

In total, 101 patients suffering from DLS were retrospectively studied within a single medical center. Age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index were uniformly recorded. PRO-related indicators include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association's (JOA) score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. Sagittal alignment, coronal balance, and stability of the L4/5 level were evaluated through whole-spine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and dynamic lumbar X-ray.

RESULTS

Increasing age (P = 0.005), higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (P < 0.001), and global coronal imbalance (GCI) (P = 0.023) were independent risk factors for higher ODI. Patients with GCI had lower JOA scores (P = 0.001) than those with balanced coronal alignment. Unstable spondylolisthesis (P < 0.001) and GCI (P = 0.009) were two vital predictors of VAS-back pain. Increasing age (P = 0.031), local coronal imbalance (LCI) (P < 0.001), and GCI (P < 0.001) were associated with higher VAS-leg pain. Moreover, patients with coronal imbalance also exhibited significant sagittal malalignment based on the subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

DLS patients with higher SVA, unstable spondylolistheses, a combination of LCI/GCI, or increasing age were predisposed to have more severe subjective symptoms before surgery.

A gait functional classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) based on spatio-temporal parameters (STP)

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic decisions for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are mostly based on static measurements performed on two-dimensional standing full-spine radiographs. However, the trunk plays an essential role in the human locomotion, and the functional consequences during daily activities of this specific and common spinal deformity are not factored in.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does patients with AIS have specific gait patterns based on spatio-temporals parameters measurements ?

METHODS

90 AIS patients (aged 10-18 years) with preoperative simplified gait analysis were retrospectively included for analysis between 2017 and 2020. Spatio-temporal parameters (STP) were measured on a 3-m baropodometric gaitway and included the measurement of 15 normalized gait parameters. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify group of patients based on the similarities of their gait patterns, and functional variables' inter-group differences were also measured. The subject distribution was calculated to identify the structural characteristics of the subjects according to their gait patterns.

RESULTS

Three gait patterns were identified. Cluster 1 (46%) was defined by asymmetry, Cluster 2 (16%) by instability, and Cluster 3 (36%) by variability. Each cluster was significantly different from the other ones on at least 6 different parameters (p < 0.05). Furthermore, each cluster was associated with one type of curve: Lenke 1 for Cluster 1 (57.5%), Lenke 6 for Cluster 2 (40%) and Lenke 5 for Cluster 3 (43.5%).

SIGNIFICANCE

Patients with severe AIS have a dynamic signature during gait identified on STP. Understanding consequences of this deformity on gait may be an interesting avenue to study the pathological mechanisms involved in their dynamic motor organization. Furthermore, these results might also be a first step to study the effectiveness of the different therapies.

A Review of the Main Classifications of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to review the main classifications and to present author's recommendations.

METHODS

Review of English language medical literature.

RESULTS

In recent decades, classification systems of lumbar spondylolisthesis have been proposed based on many factors, from essential causes to combinations of imaging features and clinical manifestations; the latter type of system is more clinically practical. We have systematically listed the main types of classification systems in chronological order to make it easier for clinicians to find the type of diagnosis and treatment suitable for their patients and develop an appropriate treatment plan.

CONCLUSIONS

Classification systems for lumbar spondylolisthesis have been proposed that have been based on the study of the essential causes or the combination of imaging features and clinical manifestations; the latter type of system is more clinically practical. We still have much work to do in exploring a more applicable classification of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Risk Factors for Symptomatic Bilateral Lumbar Bone Stress Injury in Adolescent Soccer Players: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Lumbar bone stress injury (BSI) is a high-risk long time-loss injury for adolescent soccer players. However, the risk factors for lumbar BSI are unclear.

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors for bilateral lumbar BSI for adolescent soccer players.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Adolescent soccer players underwent orthopaedic examination, whole-body dual energy x-ray scan, lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and muscle tightness testing at baseline. Lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope, maturity stage of lumbar vertebral body, and bone marrow edema (BME) at the L5 were examined via MRI. In addition, bone mineral density and content; trunk lean body mass via dual energy x-ray scan; and bilateral muscle tightness including the iliopsoas, hamstrings, and quadriceps were measured. Lumbar BSI was diagnosed as positive bilateral BME and extension-based lumbar pain. All participants were examined twice, one at 6 months and one at 1 year, after the baseline examination. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for bilateral lumbar BSI.

RESULTS

A total of 69 (26.3%) players were diagnosed with bilateral lumbar BSI. Asymptomatic BME (odds ratio [OR], 4.260; 95% CI, 2.153-8.431), apophyseal stage of the lumbar vertebral body (OR, 3.438; 95% CI, 1.698-6.959), sacral slope relative to LL ≥5° (OR, 4.067; 95% CI, 2.021-8.181), and hamstring tightness ≥50° (OR, 3.221; 95% CI, 1.385-7.489) were significantly associated with bilateral lumbar BSI.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of bilateral lumbar BSI was common at 26.2%. Asymptomatic BME, sacral anterior tilt relative to LL, immature lumbar epiphyses, and hamstring tightness were found to be risk factors for bilateral lumbar BSI. The results of this study suggest that regular MRI examination could facilitate the early detection of BME, and improvement in hamstring flexibility and lumbosacral alignment may prevent bilateral lumbar BSI in young athletes.

Sacroiliac joint degeneration in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and related risk factors: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the degree of radiological sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). The related risk factors for SIJ degeneration were also investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the lumbar and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of 303 patients with DLS admitted from January 2018 to December 2021. One hundred and fifty-six age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched patients without lumbar anomality who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scans were included in the control group. Sagittal parameters were measured on full-length lateral radiographs. Two protocols (Backlund's grade and Eno's classification) were used to assess SIJ degeneration. Univariate analysis and bivariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify the factors affecting SIJ degeneration in patients with DLS.

RESULTS

According to Backlund's grade and Eno's classification, SIJ degeneration was more severe in the DLS group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Multi-segment degenerative changes (P = 0.032), two-level DLS (P = 0.033), a history of hysterectomy (P < 0.001), lower extremity pain (P = 0.016), and pelvic pain (P = 0.013) were associated with more significant SIJ degeneration as assessed by Backlund's grade. The results of Pearson's correlation analysis showed positive correlation between the sagittal vertical axis and SIJ degeneration (r = 0.232, P = 0.009). The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that a history of hysterectomy was significantly correlated with SIJ degeneration in patients with DLS (r = 1.951, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

SIJ degeneration was more severe in patients with than without DLS. We should take SIJ degeneration into consideration when diagnosing and treating DLS especially those who had undergone previous hysterectomy or showed sagittal malalignment.

Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system

BACKGROUND

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common pathologies addressed by surgeons. Recently, data demonstrated improved outcomes with fusion in conjunction with laminectomy compared to laminectomy alone. However, given not all degenerative spondylolistheses are clinically comparable, the best treatment option may depend on multiple parameters. Specifically, the impact of spinopelvic alignment on patient reported and clinical outcomes following fusion versus decompression for grade I spondylolisthesis has yet to be explored.

PURPOSE

This study assessed two-year clinical outcomes and one-year patient reported outcomes following laminectomy with concomitant fusion versus laminectomy alone for management of grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis. The present study is the first to examine the effect of spinopelvic alignment on patient-reported and clinical outcomes following decompression alone versus decompression with fusion.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective sub-group analysis of observational, prospectively collected cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

679 patients treated with laminectomy with fusion or laminectomy alone for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and comorbid spinal stenosis performed by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons at three medical centers affiliated with a single, tertiary care center.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Global Physical Health (GPH), and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores at baseline and post-operatively at 4-6 and 10-12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative parameters (estimated blood loss and operative time), and two-year clinical outcomes including reoperations, duration of postoperative physical therapy, and discharge disposition.

METHODS

Radiographs/MRIs assessed stenosis, spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt; from this data, two cohorts were created based on pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PILL), denoted as "high" and "low" mismatch. Patients underwent either decompression or decompression with fusion; propensity score matching (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were used to create matched cohorts of "cases" (fusion) and "controls" (decompression). Binary comparisons used McNemar test; continuous outcomes used Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Between-group comparisons of changes in PROMIS GPH and GMH scores were analyzed using mixed-effects models; analyses were conducted separately for patients with high and low pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PILL) mismatch.

RESULTS

49.9% of patients (339) underwent lumbar decompression with fusion, while 50.1% (340) received decompression. In the high PLL mismatch cohort at 10-12 months postoperatively, fusion-treated patients reported improved PROs, including GMH (26.61 vs. 20.75, p<0.0001) and GPH (23.61 vs. 18.13, p<0.0001). They also required fewer months of outpatient physical therapy (1.61 vs. 3.65, p<0.0001) and had lower 2-year reoperation rates (12.63% vs. 17.89%, p=0.0442) compared to decompression-only patients. In contrast, in the low PLL mismatch cohort, fusion-treated patients demonstrated worse endpoint PROs (GMH: 18.67 vs. 21.52, p<0.0001; GPH: 16.08 vs. 20.74, p<0.0001). They were also more likely to require skilled nursing/rehabilitation centers (6.86% vs. 0.98%, p=0.0412) and extended outpatient physical therapy (2.47 vs. 1.34 months, p<0.0001) and had higher 2-year reoperation rates (25.49% vs. 14.71%,p=0.0152).

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar laminectomy with fusion was superior to laminectomy in health-related quality of life and reoperation rate at two years postoperatively only for patients with sagittal malalignment, represented by high PILL mismatch. In contrast, the addition of fusion for patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and spinopelvic harmony (low PILL mismatch) resulted in worse quality of life outcomes and reoperation rates.

Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Grade Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Stabilization with Rigid Percutaneous Pedicle Screws

The armamentarium of surgical treatment options for lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) includes decompression alone, stabilization with interlaminar devices, or instrumented fusion, through open or minimally invasive approaches. Despite its safe profuse use in distinctive lumbar spine disorders, using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) alone to stabilize LS has never been described before. We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data, enrolling 24 patients with LS and scrutinizing clinical and radiological outcomes. A statistically significant decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) scores (p < 0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (p < 0.001) was observed, as was a reduction in the intake of acetaminophen after surgery (p = 0.022). In the long-term, PPS effectively reduced the index-level range of motion (p < 0.001), reduced preoperative slippage (p = 0.03), and maintained foraminal height, thus accounting for the positive clinical outcomes. It induced a significant segmental kyphotic effect (p < 0.001) that was compensated for by a favorable increase in the pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) index (0.028).

The Association Between Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment and Persistent Low Back Pain After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Mild L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study

Introduction

The aim of this study was to explore the association between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and persistent low back pain (PLBP) following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for mild L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Methods

By retrieving medical records from January 2015 to April 2020, 200 patients following PLIF for mild L5-S1 spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: PLBP group and non-PLBP group. The baseline characteristics and radiographic parameters were analyzed and compared between groups.

Results

The PLBP group comprised 26 patients, and the non-PLBP group comprised 174 patients. No significant differences in preoperative spinopelvic parameters were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative variations of LL, SL, LSA, SD, and HOD spinopelvic parameters, regardless of group (p < 0.05). Postoperative PT and SS differed significantly between the PLBP group and non-PLBP group (p < 0.05). In the PLBP group, there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative PT; the same applied to SS. However, significant differences were found for the variations in preoperative and postoperative PT and SS between the two groups. The ΔPT was found as an independent risk factor for postoperative PLBP.

Conclusion

Patients with mild L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with PLBP after posterior lumbar spinal fusion had decreased SS and increased PT.

Whether Anterolateral Single Rod Can Maintain the Surgical Outcomes Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Double-Segment Disc Disease

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with anterolateral single‐rod screw fixation (AF) in treating two‐segment lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) and to determine whether AF can maintain the surgical results.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent OLIF combined with AF (OLIF‐AF) for LDDD at the L3‐5 levels between October 2017 and May 2018. A total of 84 patients, including 44 males and 40 females, with a mean age of 62.8 ± 6.8 years, who completed the 12‐month follow‐up were eventually enrolled. Clinical outcomes, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) score for the low back and leg, and radiographic parameters, including the cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the spinal canal, disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH), degree of upper vertebral slippage (DUVS), segmental lumbar lordosis (SL), fusion rate, and lumbar lordosis (LL), were recorded before surgery and 1 and 12 months after surgery. Surgical‐related complications, including cage subsidence (CS), were also evaluated. The local radiographic parameters were compared between L3‐4 and L4‐5. The clinical results and all radiographic parameters were compared between patients with and without CS.

Results

Significant improvements were observed in radiographic parameters 1 day postoperatively (p < 0.05). Local radiological parameters in L4‐5 had a significant decrease at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.05), while they were well‐maintained at L3‐4 throughout the follow‐up period (p > 0.05). CS was observed in 26 segments (15.5%). Endplate injury was observed in four segments (2.4%). There was no significant difference in the fusion rate between the segments with and without CS (p = 0.355). The clinical results improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.05), and no significant difference was observed between the groups with and without CS (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Anterolateral fixation combined with OLIF provides sufficient stability to sustain most radiological improvements in treating double‐segment LDDD. Subsidence was the most common complication, which was prone to occur in L4‐5 compared to L3‐4, but did not impede the fusion process or diminish the surgical results.

The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis

Background: Pelvic incidence (PI) has been described as a parameter that may be a risk factor for lumbar spondylolisthesis (SPL). Studies have reported PI measurement is more precise in CT scans. Very limited studies have measured PI using CT scans to evaluate SPL. We analyzed the reliability of CT scans to measure PI to evaluate SPL and compared it to patients without SPL.

Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study of PI in a consecutive cohort of patients’ pelvic/abdominal CT scans from an emergency room visit at a Level 1 trauma center between 2013 and 2016. Inclusion criteria was >18 years and had no lumbar or pelvis fracture. A total of 361 patients met the criteria for our study. We documented age, average PI, and SPL (type, grading, and location). Sagittal CT scans were used to measure PI (between hip axis to an orthogonal line originating at the center of superior end plate axis of first sacral vertebra). Patients were categorized: with SPL (n=45) and without SPL (n=316). Subgroups were comprised based on the location of SPL (L4/L5 and L5/S1) and type of SPL. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests used; p≤0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: Patients with SPL were significantly older versus patients without SPL, p=0.006. There were no statistical differences in PI between patients with and without SPL (p=0.29); between subgroups of patients with SPL at L4/L5 and without SPL (p=0.52); between subgroups with type of SPL at L4/L5 and without SPL (p=0.47); and between SPL patients at L5/S1 and without SPL (p=0.40). Patients with isthmic SPL at L5/S1 had nearly significant higher PIs (p=0.06) compared to those without SPL or with degenerative SPL at L5/S1. There was a trend towards higher PI in Grade 2 SPL patients at L5/S1, p=0.18.

Conclusions: Patients with SPL were significantly older than patients without SPL. The two trends observed were that PI was higher in patients with isthmic SPL at L5/S1 and an increased PI with Grade 2 isthmic SPL at L5/S1. Our reported CT PI measurements correlated with reported PI measured using standard radiographs in patients with SPL. CT scans may be a reliable modality to evaluate adult SPL.

How does spinopelvic alignment influence short-term clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion in patients with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis?

Context

Aims

Settings and Design

Materials and Methods

Statistical Analysis Used

Results

Conclusion

Management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: development of appropriate use criteria

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Outcomes of treatment in care of patients with spinal disorders are directly related to patient selection and treatment indications. However, for many disorders, there is absence of consensus for precise indications. With the increasing emphasis on quality and value in spine care, it is essential that treatment recommendations and decisions are optimized.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the North American Spine Society Appropriate Use Criteria was to determine the appropriate (ie reasonable) multidisciplinary treatment recommendations for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis across a spectrum of more common clinical scenarios.

STUDY DESIGN

A Modified Delphi process was used.

METHODS

The methodology was based on the Appropriate Use Criteria development process established by the Research AND Development Corporation. The topic of degenerative spondylolisthesis was selected by the committee, key modifiers determined, and consensus reached on standard definitions. A literature search and evidence analysis were completed by one work group simultaneously as scenarios were written, reviewed, and finalized by another work group. A separate multidisciplinary rating group was assembled. Based on the literature, provider experience, and group discussion, each scenario was scored on a nine-point scale on two separate occasions, once without discussion and then a second time following discussion based on the initial responses. The median rating for each scenario was then used to determine if indications were rarely appropriate (1 - 3), uncertain (4-6), or appropriate (7-9). Consensus was not mandatory.

RESULTS

There were 131 discrete scenarios. These addressed questions on bone grafting, imaging, mechanical instability, radiculopathy with or without neurological deficits, obesity, and yellow flags consisting of psychosocial and medical comorbidities. For most of these, appropriateness was established for physical therapy, injections, and various forms of surgical intervention. The diagnosis of spondylolisthesis should be determined by an upright x-ray. Scenarios pertaining to bone grafting suggested that patients should quit smoking prior to surgery, and that use of BMP should be reserved for patients who had risk factors for non-union. Across all clinical scenarios, physical therapy (PT) had an adjusted mean of 7.66, epidural steroid injections 5.76, and surgery 4.52. Physical therapy was appropriate in most scenarios, and most appropriate in patients with back pain and no neurological deficits. Epidural steroid injections were most appropriate in patients with radiculopathy. Surgery was generally more appropriate for patients with neurological deficits, higher disability scores, and dynamic spondylolisthesis. Mechanical back pain and presence of yellow flags tended to be less appropriate, and obesity in general had relatively little influence on decision making. Decompression alone was more strongly considered in the presence of static versus dynamic spondylolisthesis. On average, posterior fusion with or without interbody fusion was similarly appropriate, and generally more appropriate than stand-alone interbody fusion which was in turn more appropriate than interspinous spacers.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary appropriate treatment criteria were generated based on the Research AND Development methodology. While there were consistent and significant differences between surgeons and non-surgeons, these differences were generally very small. This document provides comprehensive evidence-based recommendations for evaluation and treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The document in its entirety will be found on the North American Spine Society website (https://www.spine.org/Research-Clinical-Care/Quality-Improvement/Appropriate-Use-Criteria).

Compensatory Pelvic Retro-Rotation Associated with a Decreased Quality of Life in Patients with Normal Sagittal Balance

Study Design

Cross-sectional observational study.

Purpose

To examine whether pelvic rotation as a compensatory mechanism for sagittal imbalance is related to quality of life (QOL).

Overview of Literature

Poor sagittal alignment is associated with compensatory pelvic retroversion and decreased QOL. Whether the compensatory pelvic tilt (PT) influences QOL is unclear.

Methods

Overall, 134 subjects aged ≥20 years with lower back pain were included (104 females; mean age, 70±9.8 years). Sagittal vertical alignment (SVA) and PT were analyzed radiographically. Patients were stratified into three groups based on SVA values: good alignment (group G), intermediate alignment (group I), and poor sagittal alignment (group P). Patients in group I were further categorized into two groups: low PT and high PT. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was used for clinical assessment, and the scores were compared between groups.

Results

As SVA increased, PT and lumbar lordosis (LL) increased and decreased, respectively. PT and LL differed significantly between groups G and P (p<0.01 for each comparison). Within group I, there was no significant difference in SVA between the high PT and low PT groups, suggesting that the high PT group had acquired a compensated sagittal balance. Importantly, all domains in the JOABPEQ (except for lower back pain) were significantly lower in the high PT group than in the low PT group (p<0.05 for every comparison).

Conclusions

This study showed that focusing solely on SVA as a single indicator can cause important losses in QOL to be overlooked in patients with lumbar disorders. Although pelvic retroversion can compensate for sagittal balance, it is associated with a significant decrease in QOL. To improve the assessment of patients with lumbar disorders, PT should be considered besides SVA.

Comparative Study between Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterolateral Fusion for Treatment of Spondylolisthesis: Clinical Outcomes and Spino-Pelvic Sagittal Balance Parameters

Objective This retrospective study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of posterolateral fusion (PLF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF + PLF) for the treatment of patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis.

Methodology A total of 77 adult patients ≥18 years with low-grade spondylolisthesis, Meyerding grades I and II, were assigned into two groups: 36 patients treated with PLF and 41 patients treated with TLIF + PLF. The PLF group is composed of the patients that were operated with pedicle screw and the TLIF + PLF group is composed of the ones that were operated with fixation and TILF by autografting. Clinical evaluation was performed using the spino-pelvic sagittal balance, Numeric Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, blood loss, operation times, and postoperative hospital stay of the PLF vs TLIF groups. The incidences of postoperative low back pain and radicular pain in the two groups were also recorded. Radiography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively to assess spino-pelvic parameters.

Results Significant restoration of spino-pelvic sagittal balance was observed in the TLIF group after surgery, and all spino-pelvic sagittal balance parameters showed significant improvement in the TLIF group after surgery, while in the PLF group, all spino-pelvic sagittal parameters had improved except the segmental angle lordosis (p = 0.316), which showed no significant difference after surgery in the PLF group. Postoperative pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt significantly improved in the TLIF group in comparison to PLF groups. Hence, TLIF can achieve better postoperative spino-pelvic sagittal balance parameters than PLF. There was no difference in the complication rates for each group. Both groups achieved significant improvement in postoperative clinical outcomes, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative low back pain or radicular pain between the two groups.

Conclusion Both surgical procedures PLF and TLIF were effective. PLF and TLIF can result in improved clinical and radiological outcomes for patients treated for low-grade spondylolisthesis. TLIF can achieve better restoration of spino-pelvic sagittal balance parameters than PLF alone.

Different Types of Double-Level Degenerative Lumber Spondylolisthesis: What Is Different in the Sagittal Plane?

BACKGROUND

Degenerative lumber spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a common orthopedic condition, described as a condition that compared with the lower vertebra, the superior vertebra slides forward or backward in the sagittal plane without accompanying isthmic spondylolisthesis. Information pertaining to different types of double-level DLS is scarce. This study aims to analyze parameters of patients with different types of double-level DLS to provide a reference for guiding surgical treatment and restoring sagittal balance of patients with DLS.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2020, records of patients with double-level DLS were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with double-level DLS were divided into 3 types: anterior, posterior, and combined; the anterior and combined types were studied. The sagittal spinopelvic parameters included C7 tilt, maximal thoracic kyphosis, maximal lumbar lordosis (LLmax), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). After descriptive analysis, demographic and radiographic data were compared.

RESULTS

Forty and 18 patients were included in the anterior and combined type groups, respectively. Both groups had different levels of chronic low back pain, but the incidence of radiating leg pain and neurogenic claudication was significantly higher in the anterior type. Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale low back scores were also higher in the anterior type. In the anterior type, C7 tilt (7.14 ± 2.15 vs. 5.41 ± 2.28, P = 0.007), LLmax (50.02 ± 14.76 vs. 36.96 ± 14.56, P = 0.003), PI (68.28 ± 9.16 vs. 55.53 ± 14.19, P < 0.001), PT (28.68 ± 7.31 vs. 19.38 ± 4.70, P < 0.001), and PT/PI (42.45 ± 11.22 vs. 36.04 ± 9.87, P = 0.041) were significantly higher. In the anterior type, PI correlated positively with LLmax (r = 0.59) and SS (r = 0.71). LLmax and SS (r = 0.65) had a positive correlation. PT/PI and SS (r = -0.77) had a negative correlation. In the combined type, PI correlated positively with LLmax (r = 0.61) and SS (r = 0.88), and PT/PI correlated negatively with SS (r = -0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with double-level DLS, the sagittal spinopelvic parameters differed between the anterior and combined types. Overall, spinal surgeons should focus on correcting sagittal deformities, relieving postoperative clinical symptoms, and improving quality of life during fusion surgery.

Impact of L4/5 Posterior Interbody Fusion With or Without Decompression on Spinopelvic Alignment and Health-related Quality-of-Life Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective case control study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the impact of single-level interbody fusion at L4/5 with or without concomitant decompression on various spinopelvic parameters and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recently, focus has swayed from a regional concern to a global sagittal alignment, more comprehensive approach in multilevel, corrective fusion for adult spinal deformity. However, only a few comprehensive studies have investigated the relationships between the various related spinopelvic parameters and HRQOL outcomes using single-level interbody fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 119 patients with lumbar degenerative disorders (mean age, 68 y; 38 males and 81 females) who underwent L4/5 single-level posterior interbody fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Participants were divided into 2 groups according to preoperative sagittal modifiers of the SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification. The correlation between spinopelvic parameters and HRQOL outcomes was investigated. Negative or positive values indicated lordosis. HRQOL outcomes were assessed using visual analog scale scores, Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaires (JOABPEQ), and short form-36 (SF-36).

RESULTS

L4/5 local lordosis increased from 6.4±4.4 degrees preoperatively to 11.3±4.5 degrees at 2 years postoperatively (P<0.0001). Further analysis of the results also showed a correlation between change in L4/5 local lordosis and change in lumbar lordosis (LL) (rs=0.229, P=0.0143). The high pelvic incidence-LL (≥20 degrees, n=28) and high sagittal vertical axis groups (≥5 cm, n=29) had lower scores in walking ability, social life domains of JOABPEQ, and physical component summary scores of SF-36 preoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively. Fusion status did not affect the HRQOL outcomes, except that concomitant decompression at the adjacent disk level yielded lower SF-36 physical component summary scores 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in L4/5 local lordosis possibly triggers a simultaneous sequence of change in total LL after posterior single-level fusion. HRQOL outcomes were negatively affected by both preoperative and postoperative pelvic incidence-LL mismatch and global sagittal malalignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Pathomechanisms and Predisposing Factors for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Narrative Review

The pathomechanism of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is not fully understood and is likely to be multifactorial. The primary cause of DLS likely is age-related degeneration of all of the components of the segments and their surroundings. Subsequently, additional factors, such as anatomical, hormonal, and mechanical stress factors, may drive the spinal segments to DLS. Reported predisposing factors that have shown a consistent association with DLS include older age, female sex, sagittal facet joint orientation, and high pelvic incidence. Future prospective epidemiological studies that include large groups of subjects and use multivariate analyses of the possible predisposing factors are needed.

Evaluation of spinopelvic parameters in lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc

Background:

Sacro-pelvic morphology and orientation are usually described in terms of pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). Orientation and morphology of pelvis can affect degenerative changes in the lumbar spine. Thus, here we investigated the relationships between various sagittal spinopelvic parameters and the degree of disc degeneration in young adults.

Material and Methods:

A hospital-based cross-sectional study with a total of 60 cases was done. Patients presenting with back or leg pain having prolapsed disc on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. A standing X-ray of LS spine from dorso-lumbar junction to mid-thigh was taken. Various spinopelvic parameters were assessed from the scannogram using the software.

Results:

The mean age was 39.27 years. L5S1 was the most common level. Mean SS, PT, PI, and LL were 37.78°, 13.52°, 51.33°, and 41.01°. Disc pathologies at L1L2, L2L3, and L4L5 level showed a positive correlation with PT, PI, and LL. Disc pathology at the L5S1 level shows a positive correlation with PT and LL. A statistically significant correlation between SS and degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4L5 was found from data with P = 0.023.

Discussion:

An increase in SS statistically significantly increases the chance of development of degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4L5. An increase in PT, PI, and LL will cause an increase in disc pathology at L1L2. An increase in SS, PT, PI, and LL will cause an increase in disc pathology at L2L3. An increase in SS, PT, PI, and LL will cause an increase in disc pathology at L4L5. An increase in PT and LL will cause an increase in disc pathology at L5S1.

Conclusion:

Standing lateral view radiograph from dorso-lumbar junction to the mid-thigh is as good as standing whole spine radiograph for measurement of spinopelvic parameters. Degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4L5 has a statistically significant correlation with an increase in SS.

Long-term results after thoracoscopic anterior spondylodesis with or without posterior stabilization of unstable incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a prospective cohort study

Background

Minimally invasive, thoracoscopic anterior spondylodesis (MIAS) is an established treatment for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Good restoration of the local sagittal alignment and good functional results have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of MIAS in patients with incomplete burst fractures and to analyze the influence on global sagittal alignment, clinical outcomes, and adjacent segment degeneration.

Methods

From 2002 to 2003, 18 patients were treated with MIAS for incomplete thoracolumbar burst fractures. Mono-segmental spondylodesis was performed with an iliac crest bone graft and bisegmental spondylodesis with a titanium cage. In this single-center prospective cohort study, 15 patients were available for follow-up (FU) after an average of 12.9 years (12.1–14.4). Seven patients were treated with a combined anterior and posterior instrumentation and eight patients with anterior spondylodesis only. The primary clinical outcome parameter was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); secondary parameters were the Short Form 36 (SF36) and the visual analog scale (VAS spine). Full spine radiographs were assessed for bisegmental Cobb angle, alignment parameters, and signs of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).

Results

ODI evaluation showed a mean impairment of 11.7% with minimal limitations in 13 patients. Neither a significant deterioration over time nor significant differences between both therapy strategies were found in the clinical scores at the latest follow-up. The mean bisegmental increase of regional malalignment of reduction was 8.8° (± 7.3°) with no significant correlation to any clinical outcome scores. The majority of patients had no signs of adjacent segment degeneration. Two patients showed minor radiologic changes. All patients had a balanced sagittal spine profile.

Conclusions

In conclusion, MIAS leads to good clinical results with—in majority—minimal spine-related impairment at the latest follow-up. No significant deterioration at 12-year FU was detectable compared to the 6-year results for the SF36 and VAS spine scores. There was no association between sagittal alignment, clinical outcome scores, and ASD.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (Nr.00015656).

Global sagittal spinal alignment in patients with degenerative low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

Global sagittal spinal alignment undergoes changes on the basis of sagittal malalignment (trunk inclined forward) in natural degenerative progression. We hypothesized that this change would associate with the disease state of the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS). This study aimed to evaluate the global sagittal spinal alignment of low-grade DS by classifying in accordance with sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

METHODS

The DS group was classified into three types according to the adult spinal deformity classification: type 1, SVA < 40 mm; type 2, 40 mm ≤ SVA < 95 mm; and type 3, 95 mm ≤ SVA. Age and sagittal spinal parameters (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI)) were compared among three types.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in age, LL, PI, and PT among the three types. In comparison between two types, there was a statistically significant difference between type 1 and type 2 and between type 1 and type 3, but not between type 2 and type 3 in these parameters. PI tended to increase as the type increases. Furthermore, there was significant difference between types 1 and 3.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated the features of the DS types classified by sagittal alignment. Large PI is one of the risk factors for SVA deterioration of DS. PI may be involved in the onset and progression of DS.

How does sagittal spinopelvic alignment of lumbar multisegmental spondylolysis differ from monosegmental spondylolysis?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in patients with monosegmental spondylolysis (mono_lysis) and multisegmental spondylolysis (multi_lysis).

METHODS

A total of 453 adult patients treated for symptomatic low-grade spondylolytic spondylolisthesis were retrospectively studied at a single center. Patients were divided into 2 subgroups, the mono_lysis group and the multi_lysis group, based on the number of spondylolysis segments. A total of 158 asymptomatic healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study as the control group. Radiographic parameters measured on standing sagittal radiographs and the ratios of L4-S1 segmental lordosis (SL) to lumbar lordosis (L4-S1 SL/LL) and pelvic tilt to pelvic incidence (PT/PI) were compared between all experimental groups.

RESULTS

There were 51 patients (11.3%) with a diagnosis of multi_lysis in the spondylolysis group. When compared with the control group, the spondylolysis group exhibited larger PI (p < 0.001), PT (p < 0.001), LL (p < 0.001), and L4-S1 SL (p = 0.025) and a smaller L4-S1 SL/LL ratio (p < 0.001). When analyzing the specific spondylolysis subgroups, there were no significant differences in PI, but the multi_lysis group had a higher L5 incidence (p = 0.004), PT (p = 0.018), and PT/PI ratio (p = 0.039). The multi_lysis group also had a smaller L4-S1 SL/LL ratio (p = 0.012) and greater sagittal vertical axis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high-PI spinopelvic pattern was involved in the development of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, and a larger L5 incidence might be associated with the occurrence of consecutive multi_lysis. Unlike patients with mono_lysis, individuals with multi_lysis were characterized by an anterior trunk, insufficiency of L4-S1 SL, and pelvic retroversion.

The Effect of Surgical Decompression and Fusion on Functional Balance in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of lumbar decompression and fusion surgery on balance and stability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and compare them to controls.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DLS is a condition in which one vertebra subluxates relative to an adjacent vertebra in the absence of a disruption in the neural arch. While the existing literature demonstrates that decompression and fusion can successfully alleviate pain and reduce disability in patients with DLS, no studies to date have used quantitative dynamic testing to determine the effect of surgery on cone of economy (CoE) measures in this patient population.

METHODS

Forty-five DLS patients performed a series of functional balance tests a week before and 3 months after surgery and were compared to 28 controls. The outcome measures included range of sway (RoS) and total sway for the center of mass (CoM) and head in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes, along with leg and back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Fear/Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ), Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK), and Demoralization scale.

RESULTS

RoS for the CoM (P < 0.005) and head (P < 0.017) decreased in all planes postoperatively. Reductions in CoM (P = 0.001) and head total sway (P = 0.001) were also observed after surgery. Furthermore, patients with DLS reported strong improvements in VAS low back (P = 0.001), VAS leg (P = 0.001), ODI (P = 0.001), FABQ Physical (P = 0.003), TSK (P = 0.001), and demoralization (P = 0.044) with surgical intervention. Although total sway was reduced after surgery, it did not return to the level of normal controls as demonstrated with more total sway of their CoM (P = 0.002) and head (P = 0.001) as well as more sagittal head RoS (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that surgical intervention for degenerative spondylolisthesis is effective at reducing disability, back and leg pain, demoralization, kinesiophobia, and fear-avoidance beliefs related to physical activity in patients with DLS. Furthermore, such patients exhibit a significantly more stable stance after surgery. However, balance parameters did not completely normalize by 3 months postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Influence of comorbid knee osteoarthritis on surgical outcome and sagittal spinopelvic/lower-extremity alignment in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to clarify the influence of comorbid severe knee osteoarthritis (KOA) on surgical outcome in terms of sagittal spinopelvic/lower-extremity alignment in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).

METHODS

In total, 110 patients aged at least 65 years (27 men, 83 women; mean age 74.0 years) who underwent short-segment lumbar fusion were included in the present study. Using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system, patients were categorized into those with no to mild KOA (the mild-OA group: KL grades 0-2), moderate KOA (moderate-OA group: KL grade 3), or severe KOA (severe-OA group: KL grade 4). Surgical results were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system, and spinopelvic/lower-extremity parameters were compared among the 3 groups. Adjacent-segment disease (ASD) was assessed over a mean follow-up period of 4.7 years (range 2-8.1 years).

RESULTS

The study cohort was split into the mild-OA group (42 patients), the moderate-OA group (28 patients), and the severe-OA group (40 patients). The severe-OA group contained significantly more women (p = 0.037) and patients with double-level listhesis (p = 0.012) compared with the other groups. No significant differences were found in mean postoperative JOA scores or recovery rate among the 3 groups. The mean postoperative JOA subscore for restriction of activities of daily living was only significantly lower in the severe-OA group compared with the other groups (p = 0.010). The severe-OA group exhibited significantly greater pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and knee flexion angle (KFA), along with a smaller degree of lumbar lordosis than the mild-OA group both pre- and postoperatively (all p < 0.05). Overall, the rate of radiographic ASD was observed to be higher in the severe-OA group than in the mild-OA group (p = 0.015). Patients with ASD in the severe-OA group exhibited significantly greater pelvic tilt, pre- and postoperatively, along with less lumbar lordosis, than the patients without ASD postoperatively (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A lack of lumbar lordosis caused by double-level listhesis and knee flexion contracture compensated for by far greater pelvic retroversion is experienced by elderly patients with DLS and severe KOA. Therefore, corrective lumbar surgery and knee arthroplasty may be considered to improve sagittal alignment, which may contribute to the prevention of ASD, resulting in favorable long-term surgical outcomes.

Analysis of Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance and Persistent Low Back Pain (PLBP) for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (DS) following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF)

Objective

To investigate the change of spinopelvic sagittal balance and clinical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), especially the relationship between sagittal spinopelvic parameters and persistent low back pain (PLBP).

Methods

107 patients who were diagnosed with DS and underwent PLIF in our department were enrolled retrospectively in the present study. Sagittal spinopelvic parameters including lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), height of the disc (HOD), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT) were recorded pre- and postoperatively. Sagittal balance and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without PLBP. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the change of sagittal balance parameters and clinical functions. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the risk factors of PLBP.

Results

It showed significant improvements of SL, HOD, and PT postoperatively. Both the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) had significant improvement postoperatively. Change of PT and SL also differed observably between patients with and without PLBP. SL and PT were correlated with NRS and ODI, and insufficient restoration of PT was an independent factor for PLBP.

Conclusion

The sagittal balance parameters and clinical outcomes can be improved markedly via PLIF for treating DS. Restoration of SL and PT was correlated with satisfactory outcomes, and adequate improvement of PT may have positive impact on reducing PLBP.

Bivertebral autostable claws for the proximal fixation in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective monocentric study.

OBJECTIVES

To report radiologic outcomes of a consecutive series of AIS patients, operated with a bivertebral autostable claw for the upper instrumentation over a 5-year period. The upper fixation represents the weakest part of long constructs because of local anatomy and the high pull-out forces. Various implants have been proposed, but proximal junctional failures (PJF) and shoulder imbalance still occur with variable incidence. The autostable claw is a new implant, safe, and low profile, combining the mechanical strength of hooks with the initial stability of pedicle screws.

METHODS

All AIS patients operated between January 2010 and July 2015 for a Lenke 1 or 2 curve with the bivertebral autostable claw were included. A minimum 2-year follow-up was required. Full-spine biplanar stereoradiographs were performed preoperatively, within 8 weeks postoperative and at latest examination. Local and global sagittal and coronal parameters were analyzed and complications were reported.

RESULTS

237 patients (191 Lenke 1 and 46 Lenke 2) were included, with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 0.6 years. PJF occurred in 2 patients (0.8%), and radiologic PJKs were observed in 8.4% of the series. Shoulder balance was efficiently restored or maintained in 88.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The bivertebral autostable claw is a safe and robust alternative to pedicle screws for proximal fixation in AIS long constructs. Compression and/or distraction can be applied to level shoulders, and mechanical failures remain rare at 4-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The correlation between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and degree of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Recently, several authors reported that a high pelvic incidence (PI) might be a predisposing factor to the development of anterior slip in the vertebral body in degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The purpose of this study was to analyze patients with DS using a multiple linear regression model, in terms of the correlation between the sagittal spinopelvic parameters and the severity of slip in each lumbar spine, including both anterior and posterior directions.

METHODS

Standing lateral radiographs were taken of 104 patients (59 women and 45 men) with lower back pain. The spinopelvic parameters, including PI, sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT), angle of thoracic kyphosis (TK), angle of lumbar lordosis (LL), and sagittal vertical axis offset (SVA) were measured. Additionally, the %Slip was measured at each level between the L1 and L5. The slip direction was presented as plus to the anterior, and minus to the posterior.

RESULTS

The PI, SS, and/or LL correlate with L3, L4, and/or L5%Slips. The TK and SVA did not correlate with %Slip. A multiple linear regression model shows that PI and LL were significant predictors for L4 %Slip. The ROC curve demonstrated a PI cutoff value of 51.3° and an LL cutoff value of 45.0° to be predictors of anterior slip at L4. Also, our regression models revealed that PI for L3 %Slip and SS for L5 %Slip constitute significant risk factors, while determination coefficients were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that high PI and LL are significant predictors for L4 anterior slip. At L4, the anterior slip risk-factor cutoff value was 51.3° for PI and 45.0°for LL. Additionally, our results suggest that high PI and SS could comprise risk factors for L3 anterior slip and L5 anterior slip, respectively.

Scoliosis in Patients With Friedreich Ataxia: Results of a Consecutive Prospective Series

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective monocentric study.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the radiologic characteristics and evolution of spinal shapes in a pediatric cohort of patients with Friedreich ataxia (FA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

FA is a spinocerebellar degenerative disorder responsible for gait impairment in children and young adults, and several orthopedic deformities can occur during growth, including scoliosis. However, curves' characteristics and their natural evolution have been poorly described, and the subsequent therapeutic management remains controversial.

METHODS

Sixty six FA patients were prospectively included between 2008 and 2017. Clinical, functional, and radiologic records were conducted twice a year. Coronal curve types, segmental measurements, and skeletal maturity were assessed.

RESULTS

A scoliotic deformity was reported in 71% of the patients at a mean age of 11.7 ± 3.1 years. Average follow-up was 6 years, including 75% of patients with closed triradiate cartilage at latest examination. Mean Cobb angle was 34° ± 2°. Main right thoracic curves were the most frequent curves observed (36%), followed by double major (21%), thoracolumbar and left thoracic curves (13%), main lumbar (11%), and long C-shape curves (6%). Hyperkyphosis (>40°) was present in 66%, with an average kyphosis angle of 50° ± 3°, and anterior misalignment (>5°) occurred in 53%. The severity of the Cobb angle was neither correlated to the FA severity scores nor the age at FA diagnosis. An arthrodesis was performed in 9 patients, including 5 patients (45%) who were ambulatory at least 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of scoliosis in FA was high (71%), and thoracic hyperkyphosis, with anterior misalignment, was frequently observed, which might be related to the anterior imbalance frequently encountered in patients with an ataxia. Posterior fusion including sacral instrumentation was only performed in nonambulatory patients, and the loss of ambulation was not associated with spinal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Sagittal Alignment With Downward Slope of the Lower Lumbar Motion Segment Influences Its Modes of Failure in Direct Compression: A Mechanical and Microstructural Investigation

STUDY DESIGN

Microstructural investigation of compression-induced herniation of ovine lumbar discs with and without added component of anterior-inferior slope.

OBJECTIVE

Does increased shear arising from a simulated component of motion segment slope imitating sacral slope weaken the lateral annulus and increase risk of overt herniation at this same region.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An increase in sacral slope secondary to lordosis and pelvic incidence increases shear stresses at the lumbosacral junction and has been associated with an increase in spondylolisthetic disorders and back injury. The small component of forward shear induced when a segment is compressed in flexion is suggested to cause differential recruitment of the lateral annular fibers leading to its early disruption followed by intra-annular nuclear tracking to the posterolateral/posterior regions. However, the influence of even greater forward shear arising from the added component of slope seen where pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis are increased in the lower lumbar spine is less understood.

METHODS

Ovine motion segments were compressed at 40 mm/min up to failure; 9 with a horizontal disc alignment and 26 with a segment slope of 15° and then analyzed structurally.

RESULTS

All the horizontal discs failed (11.8 ± 2.4 kN) via vertebral fracture without any evidence of soft tissue failure even in the lateral aspects of the discs. The increased forward shear resulting from the slope decreased the failure load (6.4 ± 1.6 kN). The sloping discs mostly suffered mid-span, noncontinuous disruption of the lateral annulus with some extruding nuclear material directly from these same lateral regions.

CONCLUSION

The increased level of forward shear generated in moderately sloping lumbar segments when compressed was abnormally damaging to the lateral regions of the disc annulus. This is consistent with the view that shear differentially loads the oblique-counter oblique fiber sets in the lateral annulus, increasing its vulnerability to early disruption and overt herniation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Do Curve Characteristics Influence Stenosis Location and Occurrence of Radicular Pain in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the various locations of spinal stenosis (LSS) in lumbar scoliosis and its related clinical symptoms.

INTRODUCTION

Adults with lumbar scoliosis often present with pain and disability. Association of scoliosis and stenosis is not rare, but remains sparsely explored. Consequences of scoliosis on stenosis location and treatment remain debatable.

METHODS

Patients operated for symptomatic LSS with lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle >20°) from 2015 to 2016 were included. All patients completed preoperative clinical and neurologic examination. Coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters, rotatory subluxation (RS), and spondylolisthesis were analyzed on full spine radiographs. Computed tomographic scan multiplanar reconstructions were performed to measure central, foraminal, and lateral recess stenosis, from T10 to the sacrum.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were included (69 ± 9 years old, 77% female). Sixty percent had neurogenic claudication, and L5 was the most common radicular pain (41%). The mean Cobb angle was 33° ± 16°. Overall, 35 (46%) patients had coronal malalignment; in 69%, side of the coronal tilt corresponded to side of the concavity of the lumbosacral curve. Sixty patients had RS (most frequent level L3-L4). In 50% of the cohort, RS was located at the junction between the lumbar and lumbosacral curves. In 70% (n = 53) of the patients, central stenosis occurred at the junction between the lumbar and lumbosacral curves. Foraminal and lateral stenosis were most frequently observed in the concavity of the distal lumbosacral curve. L5 radicular pain was significantly more frequent in case of lumbosacral contra-curve and right coronal malalignment.

CONCLUSION

LSS is frequent in lumbar scoliosis. Relationships exist between curve characteristics and symptomatic LSS in lumbar scoliosis; especially, concavity of the lumbosacral contra-curve and the junctional level between the lumbar curve and the lumbosacral contra-curve. Therefore, accurate analysis of stenosis in ASD seems mandatory, to at least perform decompression because perfect planned treatment for stenosis and scoliosis correction might not always be possible because of the patient's general health status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.