Lumbar sequestrectomy via a translaminar approach

Trans-Tubular Translaminar Microscopic-Assisted Nucleotomy for Lumbar Disc Herniations in the Hidden Zone

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study in a high-flow spine center in Germany.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of the trans-tubular translaminar microscopic-assisted percutaneous nucleotomy in cases of cranially migrated lumbar disc herniations (LDH).

METHODS

Between January 2013 and January 2018, 66 consecutive patients with cranio-laterally migrated LDH were operated upon. The following outcome measures were evaluated: (1) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain; (2) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Macnab´s criteria. All patients were operated upon with trans-tubular Translaminar Microscopic-assisted Percutaneous Nucleotomy (TL-MAPN). Perioperative radiographic and clinical evaluations were reported. The mean follow-up period was 32 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 59 years. L4/L5 was the commonest affected level (27 patients). The mean preoperative VAS for leg pain was 6.44 (±2.06), improved to 0,35 (±0.59) postoperatively. Dural injury occurred in 1 patient, treated with dural patch. Improved neurological function was reported in 41/44 Patients (neurological improvement rate of 93%) at the final follow up. There was a significant improvement in the mean ODI values, from 50.19 ± 4.92 preoperatively to 10.14 ± 2.22 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Sixty four out of 66 patients (96%) showed an excellent or good functional outcome according to Macnab´s criteria. No recurrent herniations were observed.

CONCLUSION

The translaminar approach is a viable minimal invasive technique for cranially migrated LDH. The preservation of the flavum ligament is one of the main advantages of this technique. It is an effective, safe and reproducible minimally invasive surgical alternative in treatment of cranially migrated LDHs.

Advantages of a Microsurgical Translaminar Approach (Keyhole Laminotomy) for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation

BACKGROUND

To prevent risk of iatrogenic instability after surgery for upper lumbar disc herniation, we adapted a microsurgical translaminar approach (keyhole laminotomy), which allows less destructive laminotomy. We compared results of translaminar and interlaminar approaches.

METHODS

The study enrolled 48 patients who underwent single-level discectomy in the upper lumbar spine (L1-2 or L2-3). Patients were allocated to 2 groups: a translaminar group (n = 20) or an interlaminar group (n = 28). Mean patient age was 57.04 ± 12.77 years, and median follow-up duration was 3.5 years (range, 1.0-7.0 years). Clinical and radiologic data were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, surgical level, and preoperative symptoms, were nonsignificantly different. At 1 year after surgery, improvement in leg pain as determined by visual analog scale was nonsignificantly different. Improvement in visual analog scale for back pain was significantly greater in the translaminar group compared with interlaminar group (mean 4.00 ± 1.56 vs. 2.45 ± 2.01, P < 0.001). Surgical outcome was not different between groups. Mean decrease in disc height at operated level was not significantly different between groups. Mean increase in segmental range of motion at surgical levels was significantly greater in the interlaminar group (-3.38 ± 4.03° vs. 1.10 ± 3.03°, P = 0.010), and mean recovery of total lumbar lordosis was significantly greater in the translaminar group (9.80 ± 5.96° vs. 0.43 ± 8.45°, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

The translaminar approach provides a safe and effective alternative to the classic interlaminar approach for upper lumbar disc herniation.