1
|
Kalavacherla S, Stone LE, McCann CP, Saripella M, Pham MH. A systematic review of pseudarthrosis and reoperation rates in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity correction. World Neurosurg X 2024; 22:100282. [PMID: 38444873 PMCID: PMC10914570 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/objective The recent development of minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) has made possible the correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) with less blood loss and shorter hospital stays. However, minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws at the proximal level of the construct can increase pseudarthrosis risk, leading to implant failure, kyphosis, and reoperations. We aggregate existing literature to describe pseudarthrosis rates at the proximal thoracic or thoracolumbar junction in MIS and subsequent reoperation rates. Methods After a three-tied search strategy in PubMed, we identified 9 articles for study inclusion, describing outcomes from MIS correction of ASD, pseudarthrosis as complication, and surgery on 4+ levels. Baseline patient characteristics and combined rates of pseudarthrosis and reoperation were calculated. Results A total of 482 patients were studied with an average [range] age of 65.5 [60.4,72], 6.3 [4.4,11] levels fused per patient, follow-up time of 28.3 [12,39] months, and 64.8% females. Pseudarthrosis was reported in 28 of 482 pooled patients (5.8%) of which 15 of 374 pooled patients (4.0%) ultimately underwent a reoperation for pseudarthrosis. Post-operative characteristics included an estimated blood loss (EBL) of 527.1 [241,1466] mL, operating time of 297.9 [183,475] minutes, and length of stay of 7.7 [5,10] days. Among the papers comparing MIS to open surgery, all reported a significantly lower EBL in patients treated with MIS. Conclusion This analysis demonstrate a measurable pseudarthrosis risk when using MIS to treat ASD, overwhelming requiring reoperation. The benefits of MIS must be considered against the drawbacks of pseudarthrosis when determining ASD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren E. Stone
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Carson P. McCann
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Megana Saripella
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Martin H. Pham
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noureldine MHA, McBride P, Liaw D, Coughlin E, Mhaskar R, Alikhani P. Pelvic Incidence as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Anterior Column Realignment with Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release to Restore Lordosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Cohort Study. World Neurosurg 2024; 182:e772-e779. [PMID: 38092350 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify variables that may contribute to the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients with long lumbo-sacral and thoraco-lumbo-pelvic constructs undergoing anterior column realignment (ACR) with anterior longitudinal ligament release (ALLR). METHODS Data of patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent ACR with ALLR at L3-4 were collected retrospectively from medical records and a prospectively maintained spine research database between 2016 and 2022. RESULTS Eleven (41%) developed PJF at a mean of 24 ± 21 months from the index surgery. The cohort was then divided into 2 groups for analysis, 13 subjects in the high pelvic incidence (PI) group (defined as PI ≥ 55°) and 14 subjects in the low PI group (defined as PI < 55°). Visual Analog Scale for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 9.5 to 2.1 and 61 to 10 in the high PI group, and from 8.9 to 2.4 and 60.9 to 10.3 in the low PI group, respectively. PI (P = 0.004), sacral slope (P = 0.005), and postoperative PI-lumbar lordosis mismatch (P = 0.02) were found to be significant predictors of PJF. The receiver operator curve revealed a cutoff PI value ≤ 53° (95% confidence interval: 52°-64°), below which the risk of PJF becomes significantly higher in patients undergoing ACR with ALLR at L3-4. CONCLUSIONS PI may be a predictor of PJF and highly correlates with ACR-ALLR levels. In patients undergoing L3-4 ACR-ALLR, a PI value of ≤53° is associated with a significantly elevated risk of PJF. Preoperative planning of ACR-ALLR level based on normal sagittal alignment in otherwise healthy individuals may mitigate the risk of PJF development in patients with adult spinal deformity treated with ACR-ALLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hassan A Noureldine
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Paul McBride
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Deborah Liaw
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Emily Coughlin
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Rahul Mhaskar
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Puya Alikhani
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ishihara M, Taniguchi S, Adachi T, Tani Y, Paku M, Ando M, Saito T. Surgical Approaches and Short-Term Results of Circumferential Minimally Invasive Correction Surgery for Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2023; 178:37-47. [PMID: 37419315 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We present the surgical approaches and short-term (2 years postoperative) results pertaining to circumferential minimally invasive spine surgery (CMIS) with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screw application for adult idiopathic scoliosis (AS). METHODS We enrolled eight patients with AS who underwent CMIS (2018-2020) and examined the number of fused levels, upper instrumented vertebra, lower instrumented vertebra, number of LLIF-treated segments, number of preoperative intervertebral fusions, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, various spinopelvic parameters, Oswestry Disability Index, low back pain, visual analog scale (VAS), leg VAS, bone fusion rate, and perioperative complications. RESULTS The upper instrumented vertebra was T4, T7, T8, and T9 in two cases, whereas lower instrumented vertebra was the pelvis in all the cases. The average numbers of fixed vertebrae and segments that underwent LLIF were 13.3 ± 2.0 and 4.6 ± 0.7, respectively. All spinopelvic parameters improved significantly after surgery (thoracic kyphosis: P < 0.05, lumbar lordosis, cobb angle, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis: P < 0.001), and good alignment was achieved. The Oswestry Disability Index and VAS scores improved significantly (P < 0.001). The bone fusion rates achieved in the lumbosacral and thoracic spine were 100% and 88%, respectively. Only 1 patient showed postoperative coronal imbalance. CONCLUSIONS The 2-year postoperative results of CMIS for AS were good, and spontaneous bone fusion was confirmed in the thoracic spine without bone grafting. In this procedure, sufficient intervertebral release with LLIF and a percutaneous pedicle screw device translation technique enabled adequate global alignment correction. Therefore, correcting the global imbalance of the coronal and sagittal planes is more crucial than correcting scoliosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Ishihara
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Shinichirou Taniguchi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Adachi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoichi Tani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaaki Paku
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Muneharu Ando
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takanori Saito
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Management of severe adult spinal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgical strategies without posterior column osteotomies: a 13-year experience. Spine Deform 2022; 10:1157-1168. [PMID: 35334105 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00478-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (CMIS) without posterior column osteotomies for severe adult spine deformity (ASD) correction. METHODS All patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up undergoing staged CMIS correction of ASD from January 2007 to July 2018 were identified. All included patients had fusion of 3 or more interbody levels that spanned the L5-S1 junction. Only patients with severe deformity, Coronal Cobb > 50° or at least one SRS-Schwab ++ sagittal modifier (SVA > 95 mm, or PI-LL > 20, or PT > 30) were included. All complications were noted. RESULT 136 patients met inclusion criteria; mean age of patients was 63.6 years (21-85, SD 13.7). The mean follow-up was 82.8 months (24-159, SD 36.6). The mean number of levels fused was 7 (3-16, SD 3). A total of 40 (29.4%) major complications were noted at final follow-ups: 2 (1.4%) intra-operative, 12 (8.9%) peri-operative (≤ 6 weeks from index), 26 (19.1%) post-operative (> 6 weeks from index). There was a total of 53 (40.0%) minor complications. Seven (5.1%) patients who developed radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis. Three patients (2.2%) developed proximal junctional failure. There were 8 (5.9%) cases of pseudarthrosis. Five of these occurred in patients undergoing AxiaLIF. All patients experienced improvements in patient-perceived outcomes (VAS, TIS, ODI, and SRS-22) and radiographic parameters at last follow-up when compared to pre-op (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Rates of complications with CMIS correction of severe ASD are lower than published rates of complications seen with open ASD correction. Specifically, the incidence of catastrophic complications is lower. Furthermore, CMIS is associated with significant improvements in clinical and functional outcomes, low rates of pseudarthrosis and proximal junctional kyphosis. Therefore, in the appropriately selected patient, CMIS may be an excellent alternative approach to addressing severe ASD.
Collapse
|
5
|
Elysee JC, Lovecchio F, Lafage R, Ang B, Huang A, Bannwarth M, Kim HJ, Schwab F, Lafage V. Supine Imaging Is a Superior Predictor of Long-Term Alignment Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J 2022; 12:631-637. [PMID: 32975440 PMCID: PMC9109569 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220960753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To investigate correlations between preoperative supine imaging and postoperative alignment. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of a single-institution database of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Patients were stratified by fusion location in the lumbar or thoracic spine. Outcomes of interest were postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK). Sagittal alignment parameters were compared and correlation analyses were performed. Multilinear stepwise regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of postoperative LL or TK. Regression analyses were repeated within the lumbar and thoracic fusion cohorts. RESULTS A total of 99 patients were included (mean age 63.2 years, 83.1% female, mean body mass index 27.3 kg/m2). Scoliosis Research Society classification demonstrated moderate to severe sagittal and/or coronal deformity (pelvic tile modifier, 18.2% ++; sagittal vertical axis, 27.3% ++, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, 29.3% ++, SRS type, 29.3% N type curve and 68.7% L or D type curve). A total of 73 patients (73.7%) underwent lumbar fusion and 50 (50.5%) underwent thoracic fusion. Correlation analyses demonstrated a significant association between pre- and postoperative LL and TK. Multilinear regression demonstrated that LL supine and pelvic incidence were significant predictors of postoperative LL (r2 = 0.568, P < .001). LL supine, TK supine, and age were significant predictors of postoperative TK (r2 = 0.490, P < .001). CONCLUSION Preoperative supine films are superior to standing in predicting postoperative alignment at 1-year follow-up. Anticipation of undesired alignment changes through supine imaging may be useful in mitigating the risk of iatrogenic malalignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Bryan Ang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Bryan Ang, Hospital for Special Surgery, 525
East 71st Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Alex Huang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ishihara M, Taniguchi S, Kawashima K, Adachi T, Paku M, Tani Y, Ando M, Saito T. Bone Fusion Morphology after Circumferential Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screws without Bone Grafting in the Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Study. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58040496. [PMID: 35454335 PMCID: PMC9031519 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58040496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the process and morphology of thoracic and lumbosacral bone fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent circumferential minimally invasive spine surgery (CMIS) by lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) without bone grafting in the thoracic spine and who have risk factors for bone fusion failure in the thoracic spine. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 61 patients with spinal deformities (46 women and 15 men) who underwent CMIS with LLIF and PPSs at our hospital after 2016 and completed a 3-year postoperative follow-up. The rate and morphology of bone fusion and rod fracture rate in the thoracic and lumbosacral vertebrae were evaluated. Patients were divided into the thoracic spine spontaneous bone fusion group and the bone fusion failure group. The data of various spinopelvic parameters and the incidence of complications were compared. The vertebral body conditions in the thoracic spine were classified as less degenerative (type N), osteophyte (type O), and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) (type D). Results: After three postoperative years, the bone fusion rates were 54%, 95%, and 89% for the thoracic, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine, respectively. Screw loosening in the thoracic vertebrae was significantly higher in the bone fusion failure group, while no significant differences were observed in the spinopelvic parameters, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and rate of proximal junctional kyphosis and rod fractures. Type N vertebral body condition and screw loosening were identified as risk factors for spontaneous bone fusion failure in the thoracic spine. Conclusion: This study indicated that spontaneous bone fusion is likely to be obtained without screw loosening, and even if bone fusion is not obtained, there is no effect on clinical results with the mid-term (3-year) results of CMIS without bone grafting in the thoracic spine.
Collapse
|
7
|
Conditions for Achieving Postoperative Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis < 10° in Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061586. [PMID: 35329912 PMCID: PMC8951564 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (CMIS) using lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, and to clarify the conditions for achieving postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) < 10°. Demographics and other parameters of ASD patients who underwent CMIS and who were divided into groups G (achieved postoperative PI-LL < 10°) and P (PI-LL ≥ 10°) were compared. Of the 145 included ASD patients who underwent CMIS, the average fused level, bleeding volume, operative time, and number of intervertebral discs that underwent LLIF were 10.3 ± 0.5 segments, 723 ± 375 mL, 366 ± 70 min, and 4.0 segments, respectively. The rod material was titanium alloy in all the cases. The PI-LL significantly improved from 37.3 ± 17.9° to 1.2 ± 12.2° postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative PI, postoperative LL, preoperative PI-LL, PI-LL after LLIF, and postoperative PI-LL were significantly larger in group P. PI-LL after LLIF was identified as a significant risk factor of postoperative PI-LL < 10° by logistic regression, and the cut-off value on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 20°. Sufficient correction was achieved by CMIS. If PI-LL after LLIF was ≤20°, it was corrected to the ideal alignment by the PPS procedure.
Collapse
|
8
|
Endo H, Murakami H, Yamabe D, Chiba Y, Oikawa R, Yan H, Doita M. Comparison of Hybrid Posterior Fixation and Conventional Open Posterior Fixation Combined with Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11041020. [PMID: 35207292 PMCID: PMC8880613 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11041020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared radiological and clinical outcomes between multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) + hybrid posterior fixation (PF) and multilevel LLIF + conventional open PF in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for ASD in a single institution between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-six patients (hybrid PF, 30; open PF, 26) who underwent ASD correction surgery were enrolled between 2014 and 2018. We evaluated patients’ demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiographical parameters in each group. There was significantly less estimated blood loss in the hybrid PF group (662.8 mL vs. 1088.8 mL; p = 0.012). The CRP level 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the hybrid PF group (2.9 mg/dL vs. 4.3 mg/dL; p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other demographic variables, visual analog scores for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis. There was a significantly higher percentage of major complications in the open PF group (42.3% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.039). Thus, LLIF + hybrid PF for ASD corrective surgery may be comparable to LLIF + open PF in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chou D, Lafage V, Chan AY, Passias P, Mundis GM, Eastlack RK, Fu KM, Fessler RG, Gupta MC, Than KD, Anand N, Uribe JS, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Kim HJ, Smith JS, Sciubba DM, Park P, Mummaneni PV. Patient outcomes after circumferential minimally invasive surgery compared with those of open correction for adult spinal deformity: initial analysis of prospectively collected data. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 36:203-214. [PMID: 34560634 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.spine201825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Circumferential minimally invasive spine surgery (cMIS) for adult scoliosis has become more advanced and powerful, but direct comparison with traditional open correction using prospectively collected data is limited. The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected, multicenter adult spinal deformity data. The authors directly compared cMIS for adult scoliosis with open correction in propensity-matched cohorts using health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures and surgical parameters. METHODS Data from a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity database were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, minimum 1-year follow-up, and one of the following characteristics: pelvic tilt (PT) > 25°, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 10°, Cobb angle > 20°, or sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 5 cm. Patients were categorized as undergoing cMIS (percutaneous screws with minimally invasive anterior interbody fusion) or open correction (traditional open deformity correction). Propensity matching was used to create two equal groups and to control for age, BMI, preoperative PI-LL, pelvic incidence (PI), T1 pelvic angle (T1PA), SVA, PT, and number of posterior levels fused. RESULTS A total of 154 patients (77 underwent open procedures and 77 underwent cMIS) were included after matching for age, BMI, PI-LL (mean 15° vs 17°, respectively), PI (54° vs 54°), T1PA (21° vs 22°), and mean number of levels fused (6.3 vs 6). Patients who underwent three-column osteotomy were excluded. Follow-up was 1 year for all patients. Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (p = 0.50), Scoliosis Research Society-total (p = 0.45), and EQ-5D (p = 0.33) scores were not different between cMIS and open patients. Maximum Cobb angles were similar for open and cMIS patients at baseline (25.9° vs 26.3°, p = 0.85) and at 1 year postoperation (15.0° vs 17.5°, p = 0.17). In total, 58.3% of open patients and 64.4% of cMIS patients (p = 0.31) reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI at 1 year. At 1 year, no differences were observed in terms of PI-LL (p = 0.71), SVA (p = 0.46), PT (p = 0.9), or Cobb angle (p = 0.20). Open patients had greater estimated blood loss compared with cMIS patients (1.36 L vs 0.524 L, p < 0.05) and fewer levels of interbody fusion (1.87 vs 3.46, p < 0.05), but shorter operative times (356 minutes vs 452 minutes, p = 0.003). Revision surgery rates between the two cohorts were similar (p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS When cMIS was compared with open adult scoliosis correction with propensity matching, HRQOL improvement, spinopelvic parameters, revision surgery rates, and proportions of patients who reached MCID were similar between cohorts. However, well-selected cMIS patients had less blood loss, comparable results, and longer operative times in comparison with open patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Chou
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Alvin Y Chan
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Peter Passias
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | - Munish C Gupta
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Khoi D Than
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Neel Anand
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Juan S Uribe
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Adam S Kanter
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Shay Bess
- 13Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- 15Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Justin S Smith
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- 17Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - Paul Park
- 18Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zileli M, Akıntürk N, Yaman O. Complications of adult spinal deformity surgery: A literature review. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2022; 13:17-26. [PMID: 35386240 PMCID: PMC8978850 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_159_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Adult spinal deformity incidence increases accordingly as the population ages. Even though surgery is the best option for the treatment, the complications due to surgery are pretty challenging. This study aims to review the complication rates of adult spinal deformity surgery. Methods: A literature review of the last decade was performed searching for the query “Adult spine deformity and complication.” This search yielded 2781 results, where 79 articles were chosen to investigate the complications of adult spinal deformity surgery. In addition, the demographic data, surgical interventions, and complications were extracted from the publications. Results: A total of 26,207 patients were analyzed, and 9138 complications were found (34.5%). Implant failure, including screw loosening, breakage, distal and proximal junctional kyphosis, were the most common complications. The neurologic complications were about 10.8%, and the infection rate was 3.6%. Cardiac and pulmonary complications were about 4.8%. Discussion: Age, body mass index, smoking, osteoporosis, and other comorbidities are the significant risk factors affecting adult spinal deformity surgery. Presurgical planning and preoperative risk factor assessment must be done to avoid complications. Furthermore, intra and postoperative complications affect the patients’ quality of life and length of stay, and hospital readmissions. Revision surgery also increases the risk of complications. Conclusion: Good patient evaluation before surgery and careful planning of the surgery are essential in avoiding complications of adult spinal deformity.
Collapse
|
11
|
Chan AK, Eastlack RK, Fessler RG, Than KD, Chou D, Fu KM, Park P, Wang MY, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Nunley PD, Anand N, Uribe JS, Mundis GM, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Le VP, Mummaneni PV. Two- and three-year outcomes of minimally invasive and hybrid correction of adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 36:595-608. [PMID: 34740175 DOI: 10.3171/2021.7.spine21138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies have demonstrated the short-term radiographic and clinical benefits of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (i.e., minimally invasive anterior or lateral interbody fusion with an open posterior approach) techniques to correct adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, it is not known if these benefits are maintained over longer periods of time. This study evaluated the 2- and 3-year outcomes of cMIS and hybrid correction of ASD. METHODS A multicenter database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing cMIS or hybrid surgery for ASD. Patients were ≥ 18 years of age and had one of the following: maximum coronal Cobb angle (CC) ≥ 20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 5 cm, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) ≥ 10°, or pelvic tilt (PT) > 20°. Radiographic parameters were evaluated at the latest follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared at 2- and 3-year time points and adjusted for age, preoperative CC, levels operated, levels with interbody fusion, presence of L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and upper and lower instrumented vertebral level. RESULTS Overall, 197 (108 cMIS, 89 hybrid) patients were included with 187 (99 cMIS, 88 hybrid) and 111 (60 cMIS, 51 hybrid) patients evaluated at 2 and 3 years, respectively. The mean (± SD) follow-up duration for cMIS (39.0 ± 13.3 months, range 22-74 months) and hybrid correction (39.9 ± 16.8 months, range 22-94 months) were similar for both cohorts. Hybrid procedures corrected the CC greater than the cMIS technique (adjusted p = 0.022). There were no significant differences in postoperative SVA, PI-LL, PT, and sacral slope (SS). At 2 years, cMIS had lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (adjusted p < 0.001), greater ODI change as a percentage of baseline (adjusted p = 0.006), less visual analog scale (VAS) back pain (adjusted p = 0.006), and greater VAS back pain change as a percentage of baseline (adjusted p = 0.001) compared to hybrid techniques. These differences were no longer significant at 3 years. At 3 years, but not 2 years, VAS leg pain was lower for cMIS compared to hybrid techniques (adjusted p = 0.032). Those undergoing cMIS had fewer overall complications compared to hybrid techniques (adjusted p = 0.006), but a higher odds of pseudarthrosis (adjusted p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS In this review of a multicenter database for patients undergoing cMIS and hybrid surgery for ASD, hybrid procedures were associated with a greater CC improvement compared to cMIS techniques. cMIS was associated with superior ODI and back pain at 2 years, but this difference was no longer evident at 3 years. However, cMIS was associated with superior leg pain at 3 years. There were fewer complications following cMIS, with the exception of pseudarthrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Chan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Richard G Fessler
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Khoi D Than
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dean Chou
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul Park
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Adam S Kanter
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Neel Anand
- 10Department of Orthopaedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Juan S Uribe
- 11Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and
| | | | - Shay Bess
- 12Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Vivian P Le
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pham MH, Shah VJ, Diaz-Aguilar LD, Osorio JA, Lehman RA. Minimally invasive multiple-rod constructs with robotics planning in adult spinal deformity surgery: a case series. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 31:95-103. [PMID: 34599407 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06980-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiple-rod constructs (MRCs) are often used in deformity correction for increased stability and rigidity. There are currently no reports showing minimally invasive placement of MRCs in adult deformity surgery and its technical feasibility through preoperative software planning. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively from medical records of six consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive MRCs with robotics planning by a single surgeon at an academic center between March-August 2020. RESULTS A total of six patients (4 females, mean age 69.7 years) underwent minimally invasive long-segment (6 +) posterior fixation with multiple rods (3 +) using the Mazor X Stealth Edition robotics platform. Average follow-up was 14.3 months. All patients underwent oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) as a first stage, followed by second stage posterior fixation in the same day. The mean number of levels posteriorly instrumented was 8.8. One patient underwent 3 rod fixation (1 iliac, 2 S2AI) and 5 patients underwent quad rod fixation (2 iliac, 2 S2AI). The mean time to secure all rods was 8 min 36 s. Mean improvement in spinopelvic parameters was -4.9 cm sagittal vertical axis, 18.0° lumbar lordosis, and -10.7° pelvic tilt with an average pelvic incidence of 62.5°. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was 100-250 cc with no blood transfusions, and all but one patient ambulated on postoperative day 1 or 2. CONCLUSION Spinal robotics brings us into a new era of minimally invasive construct design. To our knowledge, this is the first description of the technical feasibility of MRCs in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin H Pham
- Department of Neurosurgery, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9300 Campus Point Drive, MC7893, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA.
| | - Vrajesh J Shah
- Department of Neurosurgery, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9300 Campus Point Drive, MC7893, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar
- Department of Neurosurgery, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9300 Campus Point Drive, MC7893, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Joseph A Osorio
- Department of Neurosurgery, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9300 Campus Point Drive, MC7893, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Ronald A Lehman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Daniel and Jane Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lovecchio F, Elysee JC, Lafage R, Varghese J, Bannwarth M, Schwab F, Lafage V, Kim HJ. The impact of preoperative supine radiographs on surgical strategy in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 36:71-77. [PMID: 34507286 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.spine201739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Preoperative planning for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is essential to prepare the surgical team and consistently obtain postoperative alignment goals. Positional imaging may allow the surgeon to evaluate spinal flexibility and anticipate the need for more invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine whether spine flexibility, defined by the change in alignment between supine and standing imaging, is associated with the need for an osteotomy in ASD surgery. METHODS A single-center, dual-surgeon retrospective analysis was performed of adult patients with ASD who underwent correction of a thoracolumbar deformity between 2014 and 2018 (pelvis to upper instrumented vertebra between L1 and T9). Patients were stratified into osteotomy (Ost) and no-osteotomy (NOst) cohorts according to whether an osteotomy was performed (Schwab grade 2 or higher). Demographic, surgical, and radiographic parameters were compared. The sagittal correction from intraoperative prone positioning alone (sagittal flexibility percentage [Sflex%]) was assessed by comparing the change in lumbar lordosis (LL) between preoperative supine to standing radiographs and preoperative to postoperative alignment. RESULTS Demographics and preoperative and postoperative sagittal alignment were similar between the Ost (n = 60, 65.9%) and NOst (n = 31, 34.1%) cohorts (p > 0.05). Of all Ost patients, 71.7% had a grade 2 osteotomy (mean 3 per patient), 21.7% had a grade 3 osteotomy, and 12.5% underwent both grade 3 and grade 2 osteotomies. Postoperatively, the NOst and Ost cohorts had similar pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch (mean PI-LL 5.2° vs 1.2°; p = 0.205). Correction obtained through positioning (Sflex%) was significantly lower for in the osteotomy cohort (38.0% vs 76.3%, p = 0.004). A threshold of Sflex% < 70% predicted the need for osteotomy at a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 56%, and positive predictive value of 77%. CONCLUSIONS The flexibility of the spine is quantitatively related to the use of an osteotomy. Prospective studies are needed to determine thresholds that may be used to standardize surgical decision-making in ASD surgery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mummaneni PV, Hussain I, Shaffrey CI, Eastlack RK, Mundis GM, Uribe JS, Fessler RG, Park P, Robinson L, Rivera J, Chou D, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Nunley PD, Wang MY, Marca FL, Than KD, Fu KM. The minimally invasive interbody selection algorithm for spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-8. [PMID: 33711811 DOI: 10.3171/2020.9.spine20230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for spinal deformity uses interbody techniques for correction, indirect decompression, and arthrodesis. Selection criteria for choosing a particular interbody approach are lacking. The authors created the minimally invasive interbody selection algorithm (MIISA) to provide a framework for rational decision-making in MIS for deformity. METHODS A retrospective data set of circumferential MIS (cMIS) for adult spinal deformity (ASD) collected over a 5-year period was analyzed by level in the lumbar spine to identify surgeon preferences and evaluate segmental lordosis outcomes. These data were used to inform a Delphi session of minimally invasive deformity surgeons from which the algorithm was created. The algorithm leads to 1 of 4 interbody approaches: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), anterior column release (ACR), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Preoperative and 2-year postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS Eleven surgeons completed 100 cMISs for ASD with 338 interbody devices, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The type of interbody approach used at each level from L1 to S1 was recorded. The MIISA was then created with substantial agreement. The surgeons generally preferred LLIF for L1-2 (91.7%), L2-3 (85.2%), and L3-4 (80.7%). ACR was most commonly performed at L3-4 (8.4%) and L2-3 (6.2%). At L4-5, LLIF (69.5%), TLIF (15.9%), and ALIF (9.8%) were most commonly utilized. TLIF and ALIF were the most selected approaches at L5-S1 (61.4% and 38.6%, respectively). Segmental lordosis at each level varied based on the approach, with greater increases reported using ALIF, especially at L4-5 (9.2°) and L5-S1 (5.3°). A substantial increase in lordosis was achieved with ACR at L2-3 (10.9°) and L3-4 (10.4°). Lateral interbody arthrodesis without the use of an ACR did not generally result in significant lordosis restoration. There were statistically significant improvements in lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence-LL mismatch, coronal Cobb angle, and Oswestry Disability Index at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The use of the MIISA provides consistent guidance for surgeons who plan to perform MIS for deformity. For L1-4, the surgeons preferred lateral approaches to TLIF and reserved ACR for patients who needed the greatest increase in segmental lordosis. For L4-5, the surgeons' order of preference was LLIF, TLIF, and ALIF, but TLIF failed to demonstrate any significant lordosis restoration. At L5-S1, the surgical team typically preferred an ALIF when segmental lordosis was desired and preferred a TLIF if preoperative segmental lordosis was adequate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen V Mummaneni
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Ibrahim Hussain
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 3Departments of Neurological Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, California
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, California
| | - Juan S Uribe
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Paul Park
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | - Dean Chou
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Adam S Kanter
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Pierce D Nunley
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Frank La Marca
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan; and
| | - Khoi D Than
- 3Departments of Neurological Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the utility and cost-effectiveness of multilevel lateral interbody fusion (LIF) combined with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) (L group) and conventional PSF (with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) (P group) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The clinical and radiographic outcomes of multilevel LIF for ASD have been reported favorable; however, the cost benefit of LIF in conjunction with PSF is still controversial. METHODS Retrospective comparisons of 88 surgically treated ASD patients with minimum 2-year follow-up from a multicenter database (L group [n = 39] and P group [n = 49]) were performed. Demographic and radiographic data, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the direct hospitalization cost for the initial surgery and 2-year total hospitalization cost were analyzed. RESULTS Analyses of sagittal spinal alignment showed no significant difference between the two groups at baseline and 2 years post-operation. Surgical time was longer in the L group (L vs. P: 354 vs. 268 minutes, P < 0.01), whereas the amount of blood loss was greater in the P group (494 vs. 678 mL, P = 0.03). The HRQoL was improved similarly at 2 years post-operation (L vs. P: SRS-22 total score, 3.86 vs. 3.80, P = 0.54), with comparable revision rates (L vs. P: 18% vs. 10%, P = 0.29). The total direct cost of index surgery was significantly higher in the L group (65,937 vs. 49,849 USD, P < 0.01), which was mainly due to the operating room cost, including implant cost (54,466 vs. 41,328 USD, P < 0.01). In addition, the 2-year total hospitalization cost, including revision surgery, was also significantly higher in the L group (70,847 vs. 52,560 USD, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION LIF with PSF is a similarly effective surgery for ASD when compared with conventional PSF. However, due to the significantly higher cost, additional studies on the cost-effectiveness of LIF in different ASD patient cohorts are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hussain I, Fu KM, Uribe JS, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity. Spine Deform 2020; 8:1143-1158. [PMID: 32761477 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00180-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be associated with substantial suffering due to pain and disability. Surgical intervention for achieving neural decompression and restoring physiological spinal alignment has shown to result in significant improvement in pain and disability through patient-reported outcomes. Traditional open approaches involving posterior osteotomy techniques and instrumentation are effective based on clinical outcomes but associated with high complication rates, even in the hands of the most experienced surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques may offer benefit while decreasing associated morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ASD has evolved over the past 20 years, driven by improved understanding of open procedures along with novel technique development and technologic advancements. Early efforts were hindered due to suboptimal outcomes resulting from high pseudarthrosis, inadequate correction, and fixation failure rates. To address this, multi-center collaborative groups have been established to study large numbers of ASD patients which have been vital to understanding optimal patient selection and individualized management strategies. Different MIS decision-making algorithms have been described to better define appropriate candidates and interbody selection approaches in ASD. The purpose of this state of the review is to describe the evolution of MIS surgery for adult deformity with emphasis on landmark papers, and to discuss specific MIS technology for ASD, including percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation, hyperlordotic grafts, three-dimensional navigation, and robotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Hussain
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Juan S Uribe
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurologic Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang MY, Park P, Tran S, Anand N, Nunley P, Kanter A, Fessler R, Uribe J, Eastlack R, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Mundis GM, Brusko GD, Mummaneni PV. Intermediate-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with less invasive adult spinal deformity surgery: patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162:1393-1400. [PMID: 32291591 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04320-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little information exists regarding longer-term outcomes with minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), particularly regarding long-segment and deformity procedures. We aimed to evaluate intermediate-term outcomes of MISS for adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS This retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database examined outcomes at 4 or more years following circumferential MIS (cMIS) or hybrid (HYB) surgery for ASD. A total of 53 patients at 8 academic centers satisfied the following inclusion criteria: age > 18 years and coronal Cobb > 20°, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 10°, or sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 5 cm. RESULTS Radiographic outcomes demonstrated improvements of PI-LL from 16.8° preoperatively to 10.8° and coronal Cobb angle from 38° preoperatively to 18.2° at 4 years. The incidence of complications over the follow-up period was 56.6%. A total of 21 (39.6%) patients underwent reoperation in the thoracolumbar spine, most commonly for adjacent level disease or proximal junctional kyphosis, which occurred in 11 (20.8%) patients. Mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and years 1 through 4 were 49.9, 33.1, 30.2, 32.7, and 35.0, respectively. The percentage of patients meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (defined as 12% or more from baseline) decreased over time, with leg pain reduction more durable than back pain reduction. CONCLUSIONS Intermediate-term clinical and radiographic improvement following MISS for ASD is sustained, but extent of improvement lessens over time. Outcome variability exists within a subset of patients not meeting MCID, which increases over time after year two. Loss of improvement over time was more notable in back than leg pain. However, average ODI improvement meets MCID at 4 years after MIS ASD surgery.
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang MY, Uribe J, Mummaneni PV, Tran S, Brusko GD, Park P, Nunley P, Kanter A, Okonkwo D, Anand N, Chou D, Shaffrey CI, Fu KM, Mundis GM, Eastlack R. Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery: Analysis of Patients Who Fail to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference. World Neurosurg 2020; 137:e499-e505. [PMID: 32059971 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is well known that clinical improvements following surgical intervention are variable. While all surgeons strive to maximize reliability and degree of improvement, certain patients will fail to achieve meaningful gains. We aim to analyze patients who failed to reach minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in an effort to improve outcomes for minimally invasive deformity surgery. METHODS Data were collected on a multicenter registry of minimally invasive surgery adult spinal deformity surgeries. Patient inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, coronal Cobb ≥20 degrees, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis ≥10 degrees, or a sagittal vertical axis >5 cm. All patients had minimum 2 years' follow-up (N = 222). MCID was defined as 12.8 or more points of improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index. Up to 2 different etiologies for failure were allowed per patient. RESULTS We identified 78 cases (35%) where the patient failed to achieve MCID at long-term follow-up. A total of 82 identifiable causes were seen in these patients with 14 patients having multiple causes. In 6 patients, the etiology was unclear. The causes were subclassified as neurologic, medical, structural, under treatment, degenerative progression, traumatic, idiopathic, and floor effects. In 71% of cases, an identifiable cause was related to the spine, whereas in 35% the cause was not related to the spine. CONCLUSIONS Definable causes of failed MIS ASD surgery are often identifiable and similar to open surgery. In some cases the cause is treatable and structural. However, it is also common to see failure due to pathologies unrelated to the index surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Y Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
| | - Juan Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stacie Tran
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, USA
| | - G Damian Brusko
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Pierce Nunley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam Kanter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Neel Anand
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Kai-Ming Fu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Adams OE, Cruz SA, Balach T, Dirschl DR, Shi LL, Lee MJ. Do 30-Day Reoperation Rates Adequately Measure Quality in Orthopedic Surgery? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020; 46:72-80. [PMID: 31899155 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unplanned reoperation rates represent an important metric in monitoring quality in orthopedic surgery. Previous studies have focused on 30-day reoperation rates, not accounting for complications that may arise beyond this time. This study aimed to understand the frequency, timing, and procedure type of orthopedic reoperations, as well as the complications leading up to these reoperations over a 1-year period. METHODS A single-center, retrospective cohort study reviewed all orthopedic surgeries performed within a three-year period and subsequently identified reoperations within a year following the initial case. Exclusion criteria for reoperations included those that were planned, involved a different body part, or had a different laterality from the first operation. The cases were analyzed by procedure type, timing of reoperation, and causes of reoperation. RESULTS Of the 10,449 orthopedic surgeries performed between 2012 and 2015, 947 (9.1%) were unplanned reoperations within 1 year. Most (775; 81.8%) unplanned reoperations occurred after 30 days. Infections/wound complications (58.2%) were the most common reason for unplanned reoperations at 1 month from the initial operation, and mechanical complications (49.5%) predominated at the 6-months-to-1-year time frame. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that the current paradigm of focusing on reoperations occurring within 30 days of the initial operation captures only a fraction of unplanned reoperations. Stratification of this metric by time and precipitating complication type provides additional information that quality improvement programs may target. A 1-year unplanned reoperation rate could be used as a broad indicator of surgical quality across institutions.
Collapse
|
20
|
Burks SS, Uribe JS, Kolcun JPG, Fortunel A, Godzik J, Bach K, Wang MY. Proximal fusion constructs in minimally invasive scoliosis surgery are successful without interbody or intertransverse fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 31:851-856. [PMID: 31419804 DOI: 10.3171/2019.5.spine19192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used in adult deformity surgery as surgeon familiarity improves and long-term data are published. Concerns raised in such cases include pseudarthrosis at levels where interbody grafts are not utilized. Few previous studies have specifically examined the thoracolumbar component of long surgical constructs, which is commonly instrumented without interbody or intertransverse fusion. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent hybrid minimally invasive deformity corrections in two academic spine centers over a 9-year period. Inclusion criteria were at least 2 rostral levels instrumented percutaneously, ranging from T8 to L1 as the upper end of the construct. Fusion assessment was made using CT when possible or radiography. Common radiographic parameters and clinical variables were assessed pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 36 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics included a 1:1.8 male/female ratio, average age of 65.7 years, and BMI of 30.2 kg/m2. Follow-up imaging was obtained at a mean of 35.7 months. The average number of levels fused was 7.5, with an average of 3.4 instrumented percutaneously between T8 and L1, representing a total of 120 rostral levels instrumented percutaneously. Fusion assessment was performed using CT in 69 levels and radiography in 51 levels. Among the 120 rostral levels instrumented percutaneously, robust fusion was noted in 25 (20.8%), with 53 (44.2%) exhibiting some evidence of fusion. Pseudarthrosis was noted in 2 rostral segments (1.7%). There were no instances of proximal hardware revision. Eight patients exhibited radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK; 22.2%), none of whom underwent surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS In the present series of adult patients with scoliosis undergoing thoracolumbar deformity correction, rostral segments instrumented percutaneously have a very low rate of pseudarthrosis, with radiographic evidence of bone fusion occurring in more than 60% of patients. The rate of PJK was acceptable and similar to other published series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Shelby Burks
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and
| | - Juan S Uribe
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, The Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - John Paul G Kolcun
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and
| | - Adisson Fortunel
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and
| | - Jakub Godzik
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, The Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Konrad Bach
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, The Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neurologic Injury in Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Staged Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MOLIF) Using Hyperlordotic Tantalum Cages and Posterior Fusion Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy (PSO). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44:E939-E949. [PMID: 30896591 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the safety of MOLIF versus PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Complex adult spinal deformity (CASD) represents a challenging cohort of patients. The Scoli-RISK-1 study has shown a 22.18% perioperative risk of neurological injury. Restoration of sagittal parameters is associated with good outcome in ASD. Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) is an important technique for sagittal balance in ASD but is associated with significant morbidity. The multilevel oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MOLIF) is an extensile approach from L1 to S1. METHODS Single surgeon series from 2007 to 2015. Prospectively collected data. Scoli-RISK-1 criteria were refined to only include stiff or fused spines otherwise requiring a PSO. Roentograms were examined preoperatively and 2 year postoperatively. Primary outcome measure was the motor decline in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) at hospital discharge, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years. Demographics, blood loss, operative time, spinopelvic parameters, and spinal cord monitoring (SCM) events. RESULTS Sixty-eight consecutive patients were included in this study, with 34 patients in each Group. Group 1 (MOLIF) had a mean age 62.9 (45-81) and Group 2 (PSO) had a mean age of 66.76 years (47-79); 64.7% female versus PSO 76.5%; Body Mass Index (BMI) Group 1 (MOLIF) 28.05 and Group 2 (PSO) 27.17. Group 1 (MOLIF) perioperative neurological injury was 2.94% at discharge but resolved by 6 weeks. Group 2 (PSO) had five neurological deficits (14.7%) with no recovery by 2 years. There were four SCM events (SCM). In Group 1 (MOLIF), there was one event (2.94%) versus three events (8.88%) in Group 2 (PSO). CONCLUSION Staged MOLIF avoids passing neurological structures or retraction of psoas and lumbar plexus. It is safer than PSO in CASD with stiff or fused spines with a lower perioperative neurological injury profile. MOLIF have less SCM events, blood loss, and number of levels fused. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
22
|
Anand N, Agrawal A, Burger EL, Ferrero E, Fogelson JL, Kaito T, LaGrone MO, Le Huec JC, Lee JH, Mudiyam R, Sasao Y, Sembrano JN, Trobisch PD, Yang SH. The Prevalence of the Use of MIS Techniques in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Amongst Members of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) in 2016. Spine Deform 2019; 7:319-324. [PMID: 30660228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Revised: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Electronic survey administered to Scoliosis Research Society members. OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is a paucity of data available on the practice pattern, prevalence of minimally invasive spine surgery, and the preferred minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of adult spine deformity. METHODS An electronic nine-question survey regarding individual usage pattern of minimally invasive spine surgery techniques was administered in 2016 to the members of the Scoliosis Research Society. Determinants included complexity in condition of patient population, prevalence of use of minimally invasive techniques in the surgeon's practice, prevalence of use of a particular MIS technique, strategy elected during surgery, adoption of staging of procedures and timing between staging of procedures. RESULTS A total of 357 surgeons responded (61.3% response rate), and 154 (43.1%) of the respondents said that they use MIS as a part of their surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. However, of these 154 respondents, 67 (43.5%) said that their MIS usage in deformity practice was between 1% and 20%. Only 11 (7.2%) said that they used MIS 81% to 100% of the time. The top MIS approaches that surgeons chose were MIS lateral lumbar interbody fusion 109 (70.59%) and MIS percutaneous screws 91 (58.8%). CONCLUSIONS The low rate of adoption of these techniques among the SRS members may be due to the false perception that there is not enough data to support that MIS techniques are better. This and the fact that a practitioner needs to be facile at different MIS techniques may be the true impediment to the adoption of MIS techniques in the treatment of ASD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel Anand
- Director of Spine Trauma, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | - Evalina L Burger
- Department of Orthopaedics UC Denver, University of Colorado, USA
| | | | | | - Takashi Kaito
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | | | | | - Jung-Hee Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee Hospital, College of Medicine, The Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Yutaka Sasao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Kangawa, Japan
| | - Jonathan N Sembrano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Per D Trobisch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center's Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Shu-Hua Yang
- Department of Orthopaedics, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Eastlack RK, Srinivas R, Mundis GM, Nguyen S, Mummaneni PV, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS, Anand N, Park P, Nunley P, Uribe JS, Akbarnia BA, Chou D, Deviren V. Early and Late Reoperation Rates With Various MIS Techniques for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Global Spine J 2019; 9:41-47. [PMID: 30775207 PMCID: PMC6362559 DOI: 10.1177/2192568218761032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A multicenter retrospective review of an adult spinal deformity database. OBJECTIVE We aimed to characterize reoperation rates and etiologies of adult spinal deformity surgery with circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (HYB) techniques. METHODS Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb >20°, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20°, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10°. Patients with either cMIS or HYB surgery, ≥3 spinal levels treated with 2-year minimum follow-up were included. RESULTS A total of 133 patients met inclusion for this study (65 HYB and 68 cMIS). Junctional failure (13.8%) was the most common reason for reoperation in the HYB group, while fixation failure was the most common reason in the cMIS group (14.7%). There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) than distal junctional failure (DJF) within HYB (12.3% vs 3.1%), but no significant differences in PJF or DJF rates when compared to cMIS. Early (<30 days) reoperations were less common (cMIS = 1.5%; HYB = 6.1%) than late (>30 days) reoperations (cMIS = 26.5%; HYB = 27.7%), but early reoperations were more common in the HYB group after propensity matching, largely due to infection rates (10.8% vs 0%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Adult spinal deformity correction with cMIS and HYB techniques result in overall reoperation rates of 27.9% and 33.8%, respectively, at minimum 2-year follow-up. Junctional failures are more common after HYB approaches, while pseudarthrosis/fixation failures happen more often with cMIS techniques. Early reoperations were less common than later returns to the operating room in both groups, but cMIS demonstrated less risk of infection and early reoperation when compared with the HYB group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K. Eastlack
- Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA,Robert K. Eastlack, Department of Orthopaedics, Scripps Clinic, 10666 N Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| | | | - Gregory M. Mundis
- Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA,San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Adam S. Kanter
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Paul Park
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | - Dean Chou
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lafage R, Obeid I, Liabaud B, Bess S, Burton D, Smith JS, Jalai C, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Ames C, Kim HJ, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Lafage V, _ _. Location of correction within the lumbar spine impacts acute adjacent-segment kyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 30:69-77. [DOI: 10.3171/2018.6.spine161468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEThe surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) often involves modifying lumbar lordosis (LL) to restore ideal sagittal alignment. However, corrections that include large changes in LL increase the risk for development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Little is known about the impact of cranial versus caudal correction in the lumbar spine on the occurrence of PJK. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the location of the correction on acute PJK development.METHODSThis study was a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database. Surgically treated ASD patients with early follow-up evaluations (6 weeks) and fusions of the full lumbosacral spine were included. Radiographic parameters analyzed included the classic spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence [PI], pelvic tilt [PT], PI−LL, and sagittal vertical axis [SVA]) and segmental correction. Using Glattes’ criteria, patients were stratified into PJK and noPJK groups and propensity matched by age and regional lumbar correction (ΔPI−LL). Radiographic parameters and segmental correction were compared between PJK and noPJK patients using independent t-tests.RESULTSAfter propensity matching, 312 of 483 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 64 years, 76% women, 40% with PJK). There were no significant differences between PJK and noPJK patients at baseline or postoperatively, or between changes in alignment, with the exception of thoracic kyphosis (TK) and ΔTK. PJK patients had a decrease in segmental lordosis at L4-L5-S1 (−0.6° vs 1.6°, p = 0.025), and larger increases in segmental correction at cranial levels L1-L2-L3 (9.9° vs 7.1°), T12-L1-L2 (7.3° vs 5.4°), and T11-T12-L1 (2.9° vs 0.7°) (all p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSAlthough achievement of an optimal sagittal alignment is the goal of realignment surgery, dramatic lumbar corrections appear to increase the risk of PJK. This study was the first to demonstrate that patients who developed PJK underwent kyphotic changes in the L4–S1 segments while restoring LL at more cranial levels (T12–L3). These findings suggest that restoring lordosis at lower lumbar levels may result in a decreased risk of developing PJK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renaud Lafage
- 1Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Shay Bess
- 3Spine Division, Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Douglas Burton
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Justin S. Smith
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Cyrus Jalai
- 3Spine Division, Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard Hostin
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
| | | | - Christopher Ames
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, San Francisco Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco; and
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 1Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Eric Klineberg
- 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Frank Schwab
- 1Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 1Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bohl MA, Hlubek RJ, Xu DS, Cavallo C, Preul MC, Chang SW, Turner JD, Uribe JS, Kakarla UK. Posterior open-wedge anterior longitudinal ligament release: Cadaveric technique analysis. Clin Anat 2018; 32:348-353. [DOI: 10.1002/ca.23317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A. Bohl
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - Randall J. Hlubek
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - David S. Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - Claudio Cavallo
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - Mark C. Preul
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - Steve W. Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - Jay D. Turner
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - Juan S. Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| | - Udaya Kumar Kakarla
- Department of Neurosurgery; Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Phoenix Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vanaclocha V, Vanaclocha-Saiz A, Rivera-Paz M, Atienza-Vicente C, Ortiz-Criado JM, Belloch V, Santabárbara-Gómez JM, Gómez A, Vanaclocha L. S 1 Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Sagittal Balance Correction. A Feasibility Study on Human Cadaveric Specimens. World Neurosurg 2018; 123:e85-e102. [PMID: 30465963 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Revised: 11/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A cadaveric feasibility study was carried out. Osteotomies to correct fixed sagittal imbalance are usually performed at L3/ L4. OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy to correct spinal deformity and spinopelvic parameters, achieving better results with more limited exposure. The data obtained will allow a fixation construct specific for this osteotomy to be designed. METHODS S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy was performed on 12 cadaveric specimens. Baseline and postprocedural computed tomography and biomechanical studies were performed. Data were analyzed with a fixation system SolidWorks model, and the redesigned fixation construct was described and analyzed with an ANSYS model. RESULTS S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy is technically feasible. The fixation can be achieved with L4, L5, and iliac screws connected with bars. The system can be reinforced with a polyetheretherketone cage placed anteriorly in the S1 body osteotomy site, a cross-connecting bar, a double iliac screw, or an anterior interbody cage placed at the L5-S1 disc. The fixation strength is improved by angulating the iliac rod channel 10°, adding a semi-sphere to the locking screw contact surface and 2 fins to its saddle. The redesigned construct showed suitable stress and deformation levels, achieving the expected biomechanical requirements. DISCUSSION Compared with surgery on higher levels, S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy allows greater correction with shorter fixation, because the osteotomy is performed at a more caudal level, modifying the spinopelvic parameters. CONCLUSIONS S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy is technically feasible. Finite element analysis results indicate that it has appropriate biomechanical properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amelia Gómez
- Instituto de Medicina Legal de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Leyre Vanaclocha
- Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Uribe JS, Schwab F, Mundis GM, Xu DS, Januszewski J, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Hu SS, Vedat D, Eastlack R, Berjano P, Mummaneni PV. The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 29:565-575. [DOI: 10.3171/2018.4.spine171206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVESpinal osteotomies and anterior column realignment (ACR) are procedures that allow preservation or restoration of spine lordosis. Variations of these techniques enable different degrees of segmental, regional, and global sagittal realignment. The authors propose a comprehensive anatomical classification system for ACR and its variants based on the level of technical complexity and invasiveness. This serves as a common language and platform to standardize clinical and radiographic outcomes for the utilization of ACR.METHODSThe proposed classification is based on 6 anatomical grades of ACR, including anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release, with varying degrees of posterior column release or osteotomies. Additionally, a surgical approach (anterior, lateral, or posterior) was added. Reliability of the classification was evaluated by an analysis of 16 clinical cases, rated twice by 14 different spine surgeons, and calculation of Fleiss kappa coefficients.RESULTSThe 6 grades of ACR are as follows: grade A, ALL release with hyperlordotic cage, intact posterior elements; grade 1 (ACR + Schwab grade 1), additional resection of the inferior facet and joint capsule; grade 2 (ACR + Schwab grade 2), additional resection of both superior and inferior facets, interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum, lamina, and spinous process; grade 3 (ACR + Schwab grade 3), additional adjacent-level 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy; grade 4 (ACR + Schwab grade 4), 2-level distal 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and disc space resection; and grade 5 (ACR + Schwab grade 5), complete or partial removal of a vertebral body and both adjacent discs with or without posterior element resection. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were 97% and 98%, respectively, across the 14-reviewer cohort.CONCLUSIONSThe proposed anatomical realignment classification provides a consistent description of the various posterior and anterior column release/osteotomies. This reliability study confirmed that the classification is consistent and reproducible across a diverse group of spine surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan S. Uribe
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Frank Schwab
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | | | - David S. Xu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Adam S. Kanter
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David O. Okonkwo
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Serena S. Hu
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rothrock RJ, McNeill IT, Yaeger K, Oermann EK, Cho SK, Caridi JM. Lumbar Lordosis Correction with Interbody Fusion: Systematic Literature Review and Analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 118:21-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
29
|
|
30
|
Liu G, Liu S, Zuo YZ, Li QY, Wu ZH, Wu N, Yu KY, Qiu GX. Recent Advances in Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in Adult Scoliosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018; 130:2608-2615. [PMID: 28799527 PMCID: PMC5678262 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.212688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Conventional open spinal surgery of adult scoliosis can be performed from anterior, posterior, or combined approach. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) was developed for the purpose of reducing the undesirable effects and complications. This review aimed to make a brief summary of recent studies of the approach and clinical outcomes of MISS in adult scoliosis. Data Sources: We conducted a systematic search from PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and other literature databases to collect reports of surgical methods and clinical outcomes of MISS in treatment of adult scoliosis. Those reports were published up to March 2017 with the following key terms: “minimally invasive,” “spine,” “surgery,” and “scoliosis.” Study Selection: The inclusion criteria of the articles were as followings: diagnosed with adult degenerative scoliosis (DS) or adult idiopathic scoliosis; underwent MISS or open surgery; with follow-up data. The articles involving patients with congenital scoliosis or unknown type were excluded and those without any follow-up data were also excluded from the study. The initial search yielded 233 articles. After title and abstract extraction, 29 English articles were selected for full-text review. Of those, 20 studies with 831 patients diagnosed with adult DS or adult idiopathic scoliosis were reviewed. Seventeen were retrospective studies, and three were prospective studies. Results: The surgical technique reported in these articles was direct or extreme lateral interbody fusion, axial lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Among the clinical outcomes of these studies, the operated levels was 3–7, operative time was 2.3–8.5 h. Both the Cobb angle of coronal major curve and evaluation of Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale decreased after surgery. There were 323 complications reported in the 831 (38.9%) patients, including 150 (18.1%) motor or sensory deficits, and 111 (13.4%) implant-related complications. Conclusions: MISS can provide good radiological and self-evaluation improvement in treatment of adult scoliosis. More prospective studies will be needed before it is widely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Sen Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Beijing Key Laboratory for Genetic Research of Skeletal Deformity, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yu-Zhi Zuo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Qi-Yi Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhi-Hong Wu
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Genetic Research of Skeletal Deformity; Department of Central Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Nan Wu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Beijing Key Laboratory for Genetic Research of Skeletal Deformity, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ke-Yi Yu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Gui-Xing Qiu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Beijing Key Laboratory for Genetic Research of Skeletal Deformity, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bae J, Lee SH. Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity. Neurospine 2018; 15:18-24. [PMID: 29656622 PMCID: PMC5944633 DOI: 10.14245/ns.1836022.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to present the current techniques and outcomes of adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery using the minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) approach. We performed a systemic search of PubMed for literature published through January 2018 with the following terms: "minimally invasive spine surgery," "adult spinal deformity," and "degenerative scoliosis." Of the 138 items that were found through this search, 57 English-language articles were selected for full-text review. According to the severity of the deformity and the symptoms, various types of MISS have been utilized, such as MISS decompression, circumferential MISS, and hybrid surgery. With proper indications, the MISS approach achieved satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes for ASD, with reduced complication rates. Future studies should aim to define clear indications for the application of various surgical options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junseok Bae
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Ho Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Complications in adult spine deformity surgery: a systematic review of the recent literature with reporting of aggregated incidences. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2018; 27:2272-2284. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5535-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
33
|
Bae J, Theologis AA, Strom R, Tay B, Burch S, Berven S, Mummaneni PV, Chou D, Ames CP, Deviren V. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 28:40-49. [PMID: 29087808 DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.spine161370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is an effective endeavor that can be accomplished using a variety of surgical strategies. Here, the authors assess and compare radiographic data, complications, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcome scores among patients with ASD who underwent a posterior spinal fixation (PSF)-only approach, a posterior approach combined with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF+PSF), or a posterior approach combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF+PSF). METHODS The medical records of consecutive adults who underwent thoracolumbar fusion for ASD between 2003 and 2013 at a single institution were reviewed. Included were patients who underwent instrumentation from the pelvis to L-1 or above, had a sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of < 10 cm, and underwent a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Those who underwent a 3-column osteotomy were excluded. Three groups of patients were compared on the basis of the procedure performed, LLIF+PSF, ALIF+PSF, and PSF only. Perioperative spinal deformity parameters, complications, and HRQoL outcome scores (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Scoliosis Research Society 22-question Questionnaire [SRS-22], 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], visual analog scale [VAS] for back/leg pain) from each group were assessed and compared with each other using ANOVA. The minimal clinically important differences used were -1.2 (VAS back pain), -1.6 (VAS leg pain), -15 (ODI), 0.587/0.375/0.8/0.42 (SRS-22 pain/function/self-image/mental health), and 5.2 (SF-36, physical component summary). RESULTS A total of 221 patients (58 LLIF, 91 ALIF, 72 PSF only) met the inclusion criteria. Average deformities consisted of a SVA of < 10 cm, a pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch of > 10°, a pelvic tilt of > 20°, a lumbar Cobb angle of > 20°, and a thoracic Cobb angle of > 15°. Preoperative SVA, LL, pelvic incidence-LL mismatch, and lumbar and thoracic Cobb angles were similar among the groups. Patients in the PSF-only group had more comorbidities, those in the ALIF+PSF group were, on average, younger and had a lower body mass index than those in the LLIF+PSF group, and patients in the LLIF+PSF group had a significantly higher mean number of interbody fusion levels than those in the ALIF+PSF and PSF-only groups. At final follow-up, all radiographic parameters and the mean numbers of complications were similar among the groups. Patients in the LLIF+PSF group had proximal junctional kyphosis that required revision surgery significantly less often and fewer proximal junctional fractures and vertebral slips. All preoperative HRQoL scores were similar among the groups. After surgery, the LLIF+PSF group had a significantly lower ODI score, higher SRS-22 self-image/total scores, and greater achievement of the minimal clinically important difference for the SRS-22 pain score. CONCLUSIONS Satisfactory radiographic outcomes can be achieved similarly and adequately with these 3 surgical approaches for patients with ASD with mild to moderate sagittal deformity. Compared with patients treated with an ALIF+PSF or PSF-only surgical strategy, patients who underwent LLIF+PSF had lower rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and mechanical failure at the upper instrumented vertebra and less back pain, less disability, and better SRS-22 scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junseok Bae
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; and
| | | | | | - Bobby Tay
- Departments of2Orthopaedic Surgery and
| | | | | | | | - Dean Chou
- 3Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 3Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Orientation of the Upper-most Instrumented Segment Influences Proximal Junctional Disease Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:1570-1577. [PMID: 28441306 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospective database. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to define the role of sagittal orientation of the construct at the upper instrumented levels in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PJK following ASD surgery remains challenging. The final alignment of the upper instrumented vertebral segments has been proposed as a risk factor for PJK, but has not been fully investigated. METHODS ASD patients with 2-year follow-up and long posterior fusion to the pelvis were analyzed. Radiographic measurements included pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis, and two upper-most instrumented vertebra (UIV) parameters: UIV slope (UIV vs. horizontal) and inclination of the proximal-end of the construct. UIV parameters were secondarily evaluated with regard to the compensatory impact of post-PJK increased PT (PREF). A comparison between PJK and non-PJK patients was performed, according to the UIV location (upper thoracic [UT] or thoracolumbar). RESULTS A total of 252 patients (mean age, 61.5 years, 83% females) were included. PJK incidence was 56% at 2-years. PJK patients had a greater change in LL and thoracic kyphosis than non-PJK patients. In the UT group, there was no difference in UIV slope for PJK versus non-PJK. However, PJK patients had a smaller inclination of the upper instrumented segments versus vertical (P < 0.001) and the PREF (P = 0.005). Similarly, in the LT group, PJK patients had a posterior inclination versus the vertical (P < 0.001) and the PREF (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION Analysis revealed that a more posterior construct inclination was present in patients who developed PJK. These results support previous hypotheses suggesting that PJK may develop in response to excessive spinal realignment. Proper rod contouring, especially at the proximal end, may reduce the risk of PJK. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
35
|
Safaee MM, Winkler EA, Chou D. Mini-open spinal column shortening for the treatment of adult tethered cord syndrome. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 44:315-319. [PMID: 28789957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is a challenging entity characterized by adhesions at the caudal spinal cord that prevent upward movement during growth and result in stretching of the cord with a concomitant constellation of neurologic symptoms. Although growth in height stops in adulthood, some patients still develop progressive symptoms; many underwent detethering as a child or adolescent, resulting in significant scar tissue and re-tethering. Recent strategies have focused on spinal column shortening to reduce tension on the spinal cord without exposing the previous de-tethering site. Mini-open and minimally invasive approaches avoid the large dissection and exposure associated with traditional approaches and are associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and similar outcomes when compared to conventional open approaches. We describe a technique for mini-open spinal column shortening. Using intraoperative navigation pedicle screws were placed at T10, T11, L1, and L2. A mini-open 3-column "egg shell" decancellation osteotomy of T12 was performed through a transpedicular approach with preservation of the superior and inferior endplates. This procedure was performed on a 28year old male with recurrent TCS and neurogenic bladder. Postoperative imaging showed a reduction in spinal column length of 1.5cm and evidence of decreased tension on the spinal cord. At last follow-up he was recovering well with improved urinary function. Spinal column shortening for adult TCS can be safely achieved through a mini-open approach. Future studies should compare the efficacy of this technique to both traditional de-tethering and open spinal column shortening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Safaee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
| | - Ethan A Winkler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lau D, Chou D. Minimally invasive instrumentation without fusion during posterior thoracic corpectomies: a comparison of percutaneously instrumented nonfused segments with open instrumented fused segments. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 27:35-41. [DOI: 10.3171/2016.12.spine16598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEDuring the mini-open posterior corpectomy, percutaneous instrumentation without fusion is performed above and below the corpectomy level. In this study, the authors' goal was to compare the perioperative and long-term implant failure rates of patients who underwent nonfused percutaneous instrumentation with those of patients who underwent traditional open instrumented fusion.METHODSAdult patients who underwent posterior thoracic corpectomies with cage reconstruction between 2009 and 2014 were identified. Patients who underwent mini-open corpectomy had percutaneous instrumentation without fusion, and patients who underwent open corpectomy had instrumented fusion above and below the corpectomy site. The authors compared perioperative outcomes and rates of implant failure requiring reoperation between the open (fused) and mini-open (unfused) groups.RESULTSA total of 75 patients were identified, and 53 patients (32 open and 21 mini-open) were available for followup. The mean patient age was 52.8 years, and 56.6% of patients were male. There were no significant differences in baseline variables between the 2 groups. The overall perioperative complication rate was 15.1%, and there was no significant difference between the open and mini-open groups (18.8% vs 9.5%; p = 0.359). The mean hospital stay was 10.5 days. The open group required a significantly longer stay than the mini-open group (12.8 vs 7.1 days; p < 0.001). Overall implant failure rates requiring reoperation were 1.9% at 6 months, 9.1% at 1 year, and 14.7% at 2 years. There were no significant differences in reoperation rates between the open and mini-open groups at 6 months (3.1% vs 0.0%, p = 0.413), 1 year (10.7% vs 6.2%, p = 0.620), and 2 years (18.2% vs 8.3%, p = 0.438). The overall mean follow-up was 29.2 months.CONCLUSIONSThese findings suggest that percutaneous instrumentation without fusion in mini-open transpedicular corpectomies offers similar implant failure and reoperation rates as open instrumented fusion as far out as 2 years of follow-up.
Collapse
|
37
|
Lumbar Radiculopathy in the Setting of Degenerative Scoliosis: MIS Decompression and Limited Correction are Better Options. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2017; 28:335-339. [PMID: 28600008 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has emerged as an efficient treatment alternative, but it is fraught with potential perioperative morbidity, incompletely mitigated by emerging minimally invasive surgical techniques. In mild-to-moderate ASD balanced in the sagittal plane, there are situations in which the counterintuitive simple decompression through a foraminotomy or laminectomy, or even a short-segment fusion may be an attractive treatment. This article presents a case example and the authors' treatment rationale and reviews the limited available literature supporting it.
Collapse
|