Compensatory modulation for severe global sagittal imbalance: significance of cervical compensation on quality of life in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis

Comparison of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty With or Without Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation on Spinal Sagittal Balance in Elderly Patients With Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To compare the effects of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with or without posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) on spinal sagittal balance in elderly patients with severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (sOVCF).

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2018, 102 elderly patients with single-level thoracolumbar sOVCF were enrolled. Among them, 78 cases underwent PKP (Group A), and 24 cases underwent PPSF+KP (Group B). Clinical evaluation included perioperative parameters, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain; Radiographic evaluation included anterior vertebral height (AVH) and rate (AVHr), local kyphotic angle (LKA), and spino-pelvic sagittal balance parameters.

Results

Perioperative parameters including operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopic time and hospital stay in Group A were less than those in Group B (p < 0.05). Compared with the pre-operative results, the ODI and VAS scores of both groups decreased significantly in the three follow-ups after surgery (p < 0.05). The post-operative ODI and VAS scores of Group A were significantly better than those of Group B, but the results were opposite at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). Compared with the pre-operative values, except that there was no significant difference in pelvic incidence (PI) (p > 0.05), other radiographic parameters of both groups were improved significantly in the three follow-ups after surgery (p < 0.05). The AVH, AVHr, LKA and lumbar lordosis (LL) in Group B were better than those in Group A in the three follow-ups after surgery (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT) differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both PPSF+KP and PKP can achieve favorable clinical outcomes and maintain the spinal sagittal balance. Compared with PPSF+KP, PKP showed more significant advantages in the early post-operative period. However, in the long-term follow-up, PPSF+KP showed better clinical outcomes and may be better than PKP in maintaining spinal sagittal balance.

Variation patterns of cervical alignment in ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis following pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the sitting position: an EOS-based investigation

OBJECTIVE

Both unchanged upper cervical lordosis combined with decreased lower cervical lordosis and decreased upper cervical lordosis combined with decreased lower cervical lordosis have been reported to occur after correction surgery for adult spinal deformity. However, variations in cervical alignment after correction surgery in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have not been investigated. The current study aimed to investigate the variations in cervical alignment following the correction surgery in AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis.

METHODS

Patients with AS who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for thoracolumbar kyphosis from June 2016 to June 2019 with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the presence (ossified group) and absence (non-ossified group) of total ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) in the lower cervical spine. Radiographic parameters, including thoracolumbar, craniocervical, and global radiographic parameters, were measured on lateral sitting EOS images.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (27 males and 5 females) with a mean follow-up of 1.5 years were identified. There were 21 patients in the non-ossified group and 11 patients in the ossified group. After PSO, both groups showed a decrease in the occiput-C7 angle (p < 0.001 for both). In the non-ossified group, the C2-7 angle decreased significantly (p < 0.001), while the occiput-C2 angle remained unchanged (p = 0.570). In the ossified group, the occiput-C2 angle decreased significantly (p < 0.001), while C2-7 angle remained unchanged (p = 0.311). In addition, the change in occiput-C2 was correlated with the osteotomy angle in the ossified group (R = 0.776, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The variation patterns of cervical alignment following correction surgery for AS-related thoracolumbar kyphosis were different based on patients with or without total ossification of ALL in the lower cervical spine. When planning PSO for patients in the ossified group, restoration of the physiological upper cervical lordosis angle could be achieved by adjusting the osteotomy angle.

Impact of cervical range of motion on the global spinal alignment in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following pedicle subtraction osteotomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The head's center of gravity (COG) plumb line (PL) and C7 PL could be simultaneously positioned over the pelvis in adult spinal deformity with normal cervical mobility. However, the position of the head in relation to the global spinal alignment has yet to be investigated in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze the position of head in relation to the global spinal alignment in AS-related thoracolumbar kyphosis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective single-center study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

AS patients who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis from January 2010 to August 2016 were reviewed. Only patients with a visible ear canal on the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The chin-brow angle, cervical range of motion (ROM), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), L1 pelvic angle, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), TK+LL+PI, PI-LL, maximal kyphosis (MK), deformity angular rate, T1 pelvic angle, T1 tilt, spinosacral angle, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) COG-C7, SVA COG-femoral head (FH), and SVA C7-S were evaluated. Data regarding the health-related quality of life, including the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS)-back score, were also collected preoperatively, 2 years postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up.

METHODS

The cohort was divided into patients with occiput-trunk (OT) concordance or with OT discordance according to the SVA COG-C7 ≤30 mm or >30 mm, respectively. There was no funding in this study and there are no conflict of interest-associated biases.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients (36 males and 7 females) with a mean age of 34.2 years (range, 18-59 years) were identified. There were 17 patients accompanied with OT concordance and 26 patients with OT discordance preoperatively. The cervical ROM was significantly lower (24.0° vs 56.1°, p<.001) and SVA COG-C7 was significantly larger (71.7 mm vs 7.4 mm, p<.001) in patients with OT discordance. Furthermore, the PT was larger (41.0° vs 33.5°, p=.010) in patients with OT discordance. After surgery, the whole cohort showed an improvement in LL (-8.6° vs -52.8°, p<.001). Moreover, the CBVA (25.4° vs 1.3°, p<.001) and SVA COG-C7 (46.2 mm vs 21.6 mm, p<.001) were significantly decreased following lumbar PSO. There were 13 patients accompanied with OT discordance postoperatively, and the cervical ROM was still lower (22.5° vs 42.8°, p=.024) in these patients. Postoperative PT was larger (26.5° vs 20.1°, p=.033) in the patients with OT discordance. At the latest follow-up, there were 17 patients accompanied with OT discordance. In these 17 patients, the cervical ROM was significantly lower (21.0° vs 47.0°, p=.001) and PT was significantly higher (26.2° vs 19.2°, p=.012). The ODI and VAS-back scores demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups preoperatively, 2 years postoperatively, or at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

OT discordance in AS-related thoracolumbar kyphosis could be caused by the reduced cervical ROM. To maintain global spinal balance, the pelvis rotated further backward in response to the larger SVA COG-C7. Moreover, the larger SVA COG-C7 could be decreased after the lumbar PSO. Although there were radiographic differences between the patients with OT concordance and with OT discordance, there was no difference in clinical outcomes, and that a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed.

Percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures improves spino-pelvic alignment and global sagittal balance maximally in the thoracolumbar region

Background

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) often cause local kyphosis. Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is a common method for the treatment of local kyphosis. However, the influence of kyphoplasty on spino-pelvic alignment and global sagittal balance when performed at specific treatment sites in the spine remains unclear.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the influence of different fracture sites and PKP treatment on the spino-pelvic alignment and global sagittal balance in patients with OVCFs.

Methods

90 patients with OVCF who underwent PKP were included in the retrospective study. According to the site of the fractured vertebrae, all the cases were divided into 3 groups: Main thoracic (MT) group (T1 to T9), Thoracolumbar (TL) group (T10 to L2) and Lumbar (LU) group (L3 to L5). 26 healthy elderly volunteers (aged over 59) were enrolled as the control group. Sagittal spino-pelvic parameters were measured on the full-spine radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively. Information of sagittal spino-pelvic parameters and global sagittal balance was gathered.

Results

Compared with the Control group, TL group showed significant differences in almost all parameters, except pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL). While only local sagittal parameters (Thoracic kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), LL) were significantly different in MT group. There was no significant difference in almost all of the parameters except for PT and TPA in LU group.

Correspondingly, the sagittal parameters of TL group improved best after PKP, except for thoracic kyphosis (TK) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). In MT group, only TLK was significantly decreased, while in LU group, only local kyphosis Cobb angle and SSA were improved.

Conclusions

OVCF mainly occurs in the thoracolumbar region. Compared with MT group and LU group, OVCF occurred in the thoracolumbar region had greater influence on the spino-pelvic alignment and global sagittal balance. When PKP was performed, the improvement of sagittal balance parameters of TL group was the best in the three groups.

Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Little information exists on surgical characteristics, complications and outcomes with corrective surgery for rigid cervical kyphosis (CK). To collate the experience of international experts, the CSRS-Europe initiated an international multi-centre retrospective study.

METHODS

Included were patients at all ages with rigid CK. Surgical and patient specific characteristics, complications and outcomes were studied. Radiographic assessment included global and regional sagittal parameters. Cervical sagittal balance was stratified according to the CSRS-Europe classification of sagittal cervical balance (types A-D).

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients with average age of 58 years were included. CK etiology was ankylosing spondlitis (n = 34), iatrogenic (n = 25), degenerative (n = 9), syndromatic (n = 6), neuromuscular (n = 4), traumatic (n = 5), and RA (n = 5). Blood loss averaged 957 ml and the osteotomy grade 4.CK-correction and blood loss increased with osteotomy grade (r = 0.4/0.6, p < .01). Patients with different preop sagittal balance types had different approaches, preop deformity parameters and postop alignment changes (e.g. C7-slope, C2-7 SVA, translation). Correction of the regional kyphosis angle (RKA) was average 34° (p < .01). CK-correction was increased in patients with osteoporosis and osteoporotic vertebrae (POV, p = .006). 22% of patients experienced a major long-term complication and 14% needed revision surgery. Patients with complications had larger preop RKA (p = .01), RKA-change (p = .005), and postop increase in distal junctional kyphosis angle (p = .02). The POV-Group more often experienced postop complications (p < .0001) and revision surgery (p = .02). Patients with revision surgery had a larger RKA-change (p = .003) and postop translation (p = .04). 21% of patients had a postop segmental motor deficit and the risk was elevated in the POV-Group (p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preop patient specific, radiographic and surgical variables had a significant bearing on alignment changes, outcomes and complication occurrence in the treatment of rigid CK.

Does the preoperative lumbar sagittal profile affect the selection of osteotomy level in pedicle subtraction osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the different preoperative lumbar sagittal profiles of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and the selection of osteotomy level for one-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one consecutive AS patients with an average age of 35.3 years and a mean follow-up time of 35.9 months who underwent one-level PSO for thoracolumbar kyphosis were divided into 2 groups based on their preoperative lumbar sagittal profiles as follows: group A, lordotic lumbar sagittal profiles; and group B, kyphotic lumbar sagittal profiles. The following radiological parameters were measured and compared: chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS). Clinical evaluation included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Perioperative and mid-term complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients in group A and 43 in group B. The preoperative LL was -21.0° in group A and 2.3° in group B (P < 0.05). The preoperative SVA was 122.5 mm in group A and 184.3 mm in group B (P < 0.05). All the patients in group A (100%) underwent PSO at L1/L2, while 90% of group B patients underwent PSO at L2/L3, with no significant difference of postoperative GK, LL and SVA between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). No obvious loss of correction was observed in either group at the final follow-up. The correction of LL and SVA showed a strong but not statistically significant increasing trend as the PSO level descended from L1 to L3 (P > 0.05). The postoperative ODI was significantly lower in patients underwent PSO at L1 or L2 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in group B had significantly worse preoperative sagittal alignments compared to group A. The distribution of osteotomy levels varied between the 2 groups due to the different lumbar profiles; however, satisfactory correction was achieved in both groups. The preoperative lumbar profiles need to be considered in selecting the optimal osteotomy level. Patients with kyphotic lumbar profiles are suitable candidates for PSO at L2/L3, while L1/L2 PSO is appropriate for patients with lordotic lumbar profiles.

Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

INTRODUCTION

This article presents the current concepts of correction of spinal deformity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Untreated AS can be a debilitating disease. In a few patients, disease progression results in severe spinal deformity affecting not only the thoracolumbar, but also the cervical spine. Surgery for correction in AS patients has a long history. With the advent of modern instrumentation, standardization of surgical and anesthesiologic techniques, surgical safety and corrective results could be improved and experiences from lumbar osteotomies could be transferred to the cervical spine.

METHODS

This article presents the current concepts of correction of spinal deformity in AS patients. In particular, questions regarding the localization and number of osteotomies, the optimal surgical target angle as well as planning and prediction of postoperative alignment are discussed.

RESULTS

Insight into recent technical developments, current challenges with correction and geometric analysis of center of rotation (COR) in cervical 3-column osteotomies (3CO) will be presented.

CONCLUSION

The article should encourage readers to improve surgical correction efficacy and provide a better understanding of correction geometry in 3CO for thoracolumbar and cervical spinal deformities.

Surgical overreduction and hyperlordotic fusion of C1-C2 joint are associated with cervical sagittal malalignment

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown that hyperlordotic C1-C2 fusion was related to postoperative subaxial kyphosis. However, most of the patients in these studies were complicated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Moreover, no studies have specifically evaluated the relationship between C1-C2 fusion angle and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope or cranial tilt (CRT) after posterior C1-C2 fusion. This study aimed to investigate the cervical sagittal alignment in non-RA patients following posterior C1-C2 fusion and the correlation between C1-C2 fusion angle and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August 2004 to December 2015, twenty-eight consecutive patients with an average age of 39.2 years (range 6-70 years) who underwent posterior C1-C2 fusion from a single institution were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 30.7 months (range 12-77 months). Angles of Oc-C1, C1-C2, C2-C3 and C2-C7, cSVA, T1 slope and CRT were measured in lateral cervical radiographs in neutral position before surgery and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

C1-C2 angle significantly increased from 13.6° ± 12.4° to 22.0° ± 8.1° at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). A significant decrease was found both in Oc-C1 and C2-C7 angles from pre-operation to the final follow-up (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). Moreover, cSVA and CRT dramatically increased from pre-operation to the final follow-up (P < 0.001). C1-C2 fusion angle was significantly associated with Oc-C1, C2-C7 angle, cSVA and CRT at the final follow-up. A significant correlation was also observed between postoperative change of C1-C2 angle and that of Oc-C1, C2-C7 angle, cSVA and CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from decreased subaxial lordosis, posterior C1-C2 fusion in hyperextension may also lead to kyphotic change of atlanto-occipital alignment and increased tilting forward of the cervical spine. Therefore, intraoperative overreduction of C1-C2 angle and hyperlordotic C1-C2 fusion should be avoided to maintain the physiologic cervical sagittal alignment.

Supra-acetabular line is better than supra-iliac line for coronal balance referencing-a study of perioperative whole spine X-rays in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and ankylosing spondylitis patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The aim of spinal deformity correction is to restore the spine's functional alignment by balancing it in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Regardless of posture, the ideal coronal profile is straight, and therefore readily assessable.

PURPOSE

This study compares two radiological methods to determine which better predicts postoperative standing coronal balance.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

We conducted a single-center, radiographic comparative study between 2011 and 2015.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 199 patients with a mean age of 55.1 years were studied. Ninety patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and 109 ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were treated with posterior surgery during this period.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline clinical and radiographic parameters (sagittal and coronal) were recorded. Comparison was performed between the new supra-acetabular line (central sacral vertical line [CSVL1]) and conventional supra-iliac line (CSVL2) perpendicular methods of coronal balance assessment. These methods were also compared with the gold standard standing C7 plumb line.

METHODS

Each patient underwent standardized operative procedures and had perioperative spine X-rays obtained for assessment of spinal balance. Adjusted multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of coronal balance.

RESULTS

Significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender, and radiographic parameters) were found between patients with DLS and AS. CSVL1, CSVL2, and C7 plumb line differed in all the perioperative measurements. These three radiological methods showed a mean right coronal imbalance for both diagnoses in all pre-, intra-, and postoperative radiographs. The magnitude of imbalance was the greatest for CSVL2 followed by CSVL1 and subsequently the C7 plumb line. A larger discrepancy between CSVL and C7 plumb line measurements intraoperatively than those postoperatively suggests a postural effect on these parameters, which is greater for CSVL2. Multivariate analysis identified that in DLS, the preoperative C7 plumb line was predictive of its postoperative value. CSVL1, but not CSVL2, was predictive of the postoperative C7 plumb line in patients with AS.

CONCLUSIONS

The supra-acetabular line (CSVL1) is better, although not ideal, as compared with the supra-iliac line (CSVL2) in determining coronal balance. Because CSVL1 still cannot be relied on with a high predictive value, it is imperative that future studies continue to identify better intraoperative markers for achieving coronal balance.