Cervicocephalic relocation test to evaluate cervical proprioception in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Normative values of spinal and peripheral proprioception in position sense among healthy adolescents and young adults

Establishing normative values and understanding how proprioception varies among body parts is crucial. However, the variability across individuals, especially adolescents, makes it difficult to establish norms. This prevents further investigation into classifying patients with abnormal proprioception. Therefore, the primary objective was to address the knowledge gap using three-dimensional motion analysis to capture position sense in adolescents and young adults. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between position sense and age, as well as the interrelationships of position senses across various anatomical sites. Healthy participants aged 10 to 25 years were included. Six position sense tests were implemented on the trunk, neck, elbow, and knee. Data were captured using a three-dimensional motion capture system. The proprioceptive measure was the absolute repositioning error (the difference between the destinated starting position and the corresponding self-reproduced ending position) of each test. A total of 103 participants were recruited. We found that only spinal proprioception was associated with chronological age, whereas peripheral proprioception was not. Subgroup analyses revealed that subjects aged 10 to 13 years had the poorest proprioceptive performance. The normative values of proprioception of various body parts were, trunk flexion-extension test = 25° ± 12°; trunk lateral-flexion test = 23° ± 10°; trunk axial-rotation test = 26° ± 11°; left neck rotation test = 2° ± 1°; right neck rotation test = 3° ± 1°; left elbow flexion test = 5° ± 3°; right elbow flexion test = 5° ± 2°; left knee extension test = 3° ± 2°; right knee extension test = 3° ± 1°. The normative values of proprioception in position sense provided in this study may help identify individuals with proprioceptive deficits and inform targeted interventions to improve proprioception.

The Effect of Schroth Method on Postural Control and Balance in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Literature Review

The objective of this review was to offer new information on the effectiveness of Schroth method on postural control and balance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar databases were searched from June 2022 to August 2022 for prospective controlled trials and randomized controlled trials related to effects of Schroth exercises on postural control and balance in patients with AIS. The key words AIS, Schroth, balance, postural control, and proprioception were used. Studies written in English language, in the last decade were included. Seven studies were included in the review, with a total of 244 study subjects. Three studies investigated the effectiveness of Schroth exercises on balance and postural control. Two studies included investigated the effectiveness of Schroth method in combination with additional treatments of bracing and hippotherapy, while two other studies investigated effectiveness of Schroth when compared with Pilates and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). The treatment duration varied from a week to 6 months. From the findings of this review, it is supported that Schroth method can have positive effects on balance and postural control in AIS patients. Further investigation is necessary.

Reliability of a three-dimensional spinal proprioception assessment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Although it is evident that some patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have proprioceptive deficit in peripheral joints, knowledge on the proprioceptive function of the deformed spine is limited. Nonetheless, spinal proprioception in AIS may be affected three-dimensionally, prior studies only focussed on evaluating peripheral proprioception in single plane. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a novel spinal proprioception assessment using three-dimensional motion analysis in patients with AIS.

METHODS

Participants were included if they had a primary diagnosis of AIS who did not receive or failed conservative treatments. Three trunk repositioning tests involving flexion-extension, lateral-flexion, and axial-rotation were conducted. A three-dimensional kinematics of the trunk was used as the outcome measures. The proprioceptive acuity was quantified by the repositioning error. The intra-examiner and test-retest reliability were analysed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients with AIS were recruited. Regarding the trunk flexion-extension test, the single measure ICC showed moderate reliability (0.46) and the average measures ICC demonstrated good reliability (0.72). As for the trunk lateral-flexion test, the reliability of single measure and average measures ICC was moderate (0.44) and good (0.70) reliability, respectively. For the trunk axial-rotation test, the single measure ICC indicated fair reliability (0.32), while the average measures ICC showed moderate reliability (0.59).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate the reliability of novel three-dimensional spinal proprioception assessments in patients with AIS. The trunk flexion-extension repositioning test may be preferable clinical test given its highest reliability.

Timely Revisit of Proprioceptive Deficits in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

The present review aimed to summarize the evidence regarding differences in proprioception between children with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

Seven electronic databases were searched from their inception to April 10, 2021. Articles were included if they involved: (1) AIS patients aged between 10 and 18 years, (2) measurements of proprioceptive abilities, and (3) comparisons with non-AIS controls. Animal studies, case reports, commentaries, conference proceedings, research protocols, and reviews were excluded. Two reviewers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, risks of bias assessments, and quality of evidence evaluations. Relevant information was pooled for meta-analyses.

RESULTS

From 432 identified citations, 11 case-control studies comprising 1121 participants were included. The meta-analyses showed that AIS participants displayed proprioceptive deficits as compared to non-AIS controls. Moderate evidence supported that AIS participants showed significantly larger repositioning errors than healthy controls (pooled mean difference = 1.27 degrees, P < .01). Low evidence substantiated that AIS participants had significantly greater motion detection threshold (pooled mean difference = 1.60 degrees, P < .01) and abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials (pooled mean difference = .36 milliseconds, P = .01) than non-AIS counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent findings revealed that proprioceptive deficits occurred in AIS patients. Further investigations on the causal relationship between AIS and proprioception, and the identification of the subgroup of AIS patients with proprioceptive deficit are needed.

A perception bias of the gravitational vertical is confirmed in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

PURPOSE

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is the most frequent spine deformity in adolescence. The cause of AIS remains unknown. Several studies show that AIS can be associated with a perception bias of gravitational vertical. In particularly, AIS patients with a right thoracic convexity exhibit deviation of the Subjective Postural Vertical. The origin of this disturbance could be located in trunk proprioceptive graciveptors. We wanted to verify this result with a population of lumbar and thoracolumbar AIS with left convexity.

METHODS

It was a multicenter, cross-sectional case-control study. Thirty adolescents with left lumbar or thoraco-lumbar AIS (age 14.3 ± 1.7 years; Cobb angle 27.6° ± 6.1°) and 30 controls matched for age (14.0 ± 1.5 years), were compared for Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) measured in static and dynamic (optokinetic stimulation) conditions, and Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV).

RESULTS

For SVV, there was no difference in the two groups, for static and dynamic conditions. The SPV was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.0001). The SPV was shifted to the left for most of the AIS patients (med - 2.4°[- 3.6; - 1.7]) compared with controls (med 0°[- 0.5; 1.7]). Adolescents with AIS perceived verticality with significant greater uncertainty in postural modality than controls (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms a significant directional bias in the orientation of SPV in left lumbar or thoraco-lumbar AIS. This confirmation paves the way to a new physiopathological model focused on trunk proprioception.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effect of vision loss on plasticity of the head and neck proprioception

AIM

To investigate whether head and neck proprioception and motor control could be compensatory enhanced by long-term vision loss or impairment.

METHODS

Individuals who were blind, low vision or sighted were included in the study, which would undergo the head repositioning test (HRT). The constant error (CE), absolute error (AE), variable error (VE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of each subject were statistically analyzed. Data were analyzed using the SAS 9.4. Tukey-Kramer for one-way ANOVA was used for comparison of blind, low vision, and sighted subjects, as well as to compare subjects with balanced vision, strong vision in the left eye and strong vision in the right eye. Independent sample t-test was used to compare subjects with congenital blindness and acquired blindness, as well as left and right hand dominance subjects.

RESULTS

A total of 90 individuals (25 blind subjects, 31 low vision subjects, and 34 sighted subjects) were included in the study. Among the blind subjects, 14 cases had congenital blindness and 11 cases had acquired blindness. Among the blind and low vision subjects, 21 cases had balanced binocular vision, 17 cases had strong vision in the left eye and 18 cases had strong vision in the right eye. Among all subjects, 11 cases were left hand dominance, and 79 cases were right hand dominance. There were significant differences in AE, VE, and RMSE in head rotation between blind, low vision, and sighted subjects (P<0.01), in AE, VE, and RMSE between blind and sighted (P<0.01), and in VE and RMSE between low vision and sighted (P<0.05). No significant difference between blind and low vision (P>0.05). Significant differences in CE and AE of head right rotation and CE of general head rotation between congenital and acquired (P<0.05). No significant differences between left and right hand dominance and in balance or not of binocular vision (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Long-term vision loss or impairment does not lead to compensatory enhancement of head and neck proprioception and motor control. Acquired experience contributes to HRT performance in the blind and has long-lasting effects on plasticity in the development of proprioception and sensorimotor control.

Head Position and Posturography: A Novel Biomarker to Identify Concussion Sufferers

Balance control systems involve complex systems directing muscle activity to prevent internal and external influences that destabilize posture, especially when body positions change. The computerized dynamic posturography stability score has been established to be the most repeatable posturographic measure using variations of the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration in Balance (mCTSIB). However, the mCTSIB is a standard group of tests relying largely on eyes-open and -closed standing positions with the head in a neutral position, associated with probability of missing postural instabilities associated with head positions off the neutral plane. Postural stability scores are compromised with changes in head positions after concussion. The position of the head and neck induced by statically maintained head turns is associated with significantly lower stability scores than the standardized head neutral position of the mCTSIB in Post-Concussion Syndrome (PCS) subjects but not in normal healthy controls. This phenomenon may serve as a diagnostic biomarker to differentiate PCS subjects from normal ones as well as serving as a measurement with which to quantify function or the success or failure of a treatment. Head positions off the neutral plane provide novel biomarkers that identify and differentiate subjects suffering from PCS from healthy normal subjects.

Rare variant of HSPG2 is not involved in the development of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence from a large-scale replication study

BACKGROUND

Rare variants of HSPG2 have recently been reported to function as a potential contributor to the susceptibility of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in the Caucasians. A replication study in the different population is warranted to validate the role of HSPG2 in AIS. The aim of this study was to determine the association between HSPG2 and AIS in the Chinese patients and to further investigate its influence on the phenotype of the patients.

METHODS

SNVs p.Asn786Ser of HSPG2 was genotyped in 1752 patients and 1584 normal controls using multiple ligase detection reactions. The mRNA expression of HSPG2 in the paraspinal muscles was quantified for 90 patients and 26 controls. The The Student's t test was used to analyze the inter-group comparison of the HSPG2 expression. The relationship between the HSPG2 expression and the curve magnitude of the patients was analyzed by the Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

No case of mutation in the reported SNV p.Asn786Ser of HSPG2 was found in our cohort. The mRNA expression of HSPG2 in patients was comparable with that in the controls (0.0016 ± 0.0013 vs. 0.0019 ± 0.0012, p = 0.29). 42 patients with curve magnitude > 60 degrees were assigned to the severe curve group. The other 58 patients were assigned to the moderate curve group. These two groups were found to have comparable HSPG2 expression (0.0015 ± 0.0011 vs. 0.0017 ± 0.0014, p = 0.57). And there was no remarkable correlation between the expression level of HSPG2 and the curve severity (r = 0.131, p = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

HSPG2 gene was not associated with the susceptibility or the phenotypes of AIS in the Chinese population. The whole HSPG2 gene can be sequenced in more AIS patients to identify potentially causative mutations.

Do Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis Have an Erroneous Perception of the Gravitational Vertical?

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, case-control study.

OBJECTIVES

Demonstrate altered perception of verticality in AIS compared with matched controls.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains to be found. AIS is associated with neurosensorial anomalies, in particular, altered control of orthostatic posture. During kinetic activity, the upright posture, in humans, is determined in reference to the gravitational vertical (GV). We hypothesized that in AIS, there is a discordance in the perception of the GV and the true GV. In AIS, the longitudinal axis of the body would thus be misoriented because of an erroneous perception of the GV.

METHODS

Thirty adolescents with right thoracic AIS (age 14.23 ± 1.75 years; Cobb angle 31.97°± 12.83°) and 30 controls matched for age (13.93 ± 1.85 years), body mass index, Tanner stage, and handedness were compared for subjective visual vertical (SVV) measured in static and dynamic (optokinetic stimulation) conditions, and subjective postural vertical (SPV).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the two groups, AIS and controls, for SVV. The SPV was significantly different between the two groups (p = .00023). The SPV was shifted to the right for most of the AIS patients (2.13°± 2.22°) compared with controls (-0.08°±1.40°). There was a significant correlation between SPV and clinical frontal tilt in the AIS patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that patients with right thoracic AIS have an erroneous perception of the GV. In most AIS patients, SPV was shifted to the right, with no alteration of the SVV. AIS might be the consequence of a reoriented longitudinal body axis aligned with an erroneous vertical reference. The underlying mechanism might involve dysfunction of trunk graviceptors. The primary or secondary nature of this dysfunction remains an open question.

Comparison of segmental spinal movement control in adolescents with and without idiopathic scoliosis using modified pressure biofeedback unit

Background

Postural rehabilitation emphasizing on motor control training of segmental spinal movements has been proposed to effectively reduce the scoliotic spinal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, information regarding the impairments of segmental spinal movement control involving segmental spinal stabilizers in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis remains limited. Examination of segmental spinal movement control may provide a window for investigating the features of impaired movement control specific to spinal segments that may assist in the development of physiotherapeutic management of AIS.

Objectives

To compare segmental spinal movement control in adolescents with and without idiopathic scoliosis using modified pressure biofeedback unit.

Methods

Segmental spinal movement control was assessed in twenty adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AISG) and twenty healthy adolescents (CG) using a modified pressure biofeedback unit. Participants performed segmental spinal movements that primarily involved segmental spinal stabilizing muscles with graded and sustained muscle contraction against/off a pressure cuff from baseline to target pressures and then maintained for 1 min. Pressure data during the 1-minute maintenance phase were collected for further analysis. Pressure deviation were calculated and compared between groups.

Results

The AISG had significantly greater pressure deviations for all segmental spinal movements of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine than the CG.

Conclusion

Pressure biofeedback unit was feasible for assessing segmental spinal movement control in AIS. AISG exhibited poorer ability to grade and sustain muscle activities for local movements of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, suggesting motor control training of segmental spinal movements involving segmental spinal stabilizing muscles on frontal, sagittal, and transverse planes were required.

Clinical balance tests, proprioceptive system and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spinal column of unknown etiology. Multiple factors could be involved, including neurosensory pathways and, potentially, an elective disorder of dynamic proprioception. The purpose of this study was to determine whether routine balance tests could be used to demonstrate an elective alteration of dynamic proprioception in AIS.

METHODS

This was a multicentre case-control study based on prospectively collected clinical data, in three hospitals pediatric, with spine consultation, from January 2013 through April 2015. From an original population of 547 adolescents, inclusion and non-inclusion criteria indentified 114 adolescents with right thoracic AIS (mean age 14.5 ± 1.9 years, Cobb angle 35.7 ± 15.3°) and 81 matched adolescents without scoliosis (mean age 14.1 ± 1.9 years). Participants performed three routine clinical balance tests to assess the static and dynamic proprioception: the Fukuda-Utenberger stepping test (angle of rotation in degrees and distance of displacement in cm) to assess dynamic balance; the sharpened Romberg test and the unipedal stance test (eyes closed) to assess static balance.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between AIS subjects and controls for the static tests, but there was a significant difference for the dynamic test for both measures: distance of displacement (p < 0.01) and angle of rotation (p < 0.0001). This result confirms our initial these: the dynamic proprioception is altered electively in AIS.

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm recent AIS studies. Our results might be related to immature central integration of dynamic proprioceptive input leading to a poorly adapted motor response, particularly for postural control of the, in AIS. These balance tests can be performed in routine practice. Their validity as a biomarker for screening and monitoring purposes should be assessed.