A pilot cadaveric study of temperature and adjacent tissue changes after exposure of magnetic-controlled growing rods to MRI

Contraindications to magnetically controlled growing rods: consensus among experts in treating early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe contraindications to the magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) by establishing consensus amongst expert surgeons who treat these patients frequently.

METHODS

Nine pediatric spine surgeons from an international EOS study group participated in semi-structured interviews via email to identify factors that influence decision making in the use of MCGR. A 39-question survey was then developed to specify these factors as contraindications for MCGR-these included patient age and size, etiology, medical comorbidities, coronal and sagittal curve profiles, and skin and soft tissue characteristics. Pediatric spine surgeons from the EOS international study group were invited to complete the survey. A second 29-item survey was created to determine details and clarify results from the first survey. Responses were analyzed for consensus (> 70%), near consensus (60-69%), and no consensus/variability (< 60%) for MCGR contraindication.

RESULTS

56 surgeons of 173 invited (32%) completed the first survey, and 64 (37%) completed the second survey. Responders had a mean of over 15 years in practice (range 1-45) with over 6 years of experience with using MCGR (range 2-12). 71.4% of respondents agreed that patient size characteristics should be considered as contraindications, including BMI (81.3%) and spinal height (84.4%), although a specific BMI range or a specific minimum spinal height were not agreed upon. Among surgeons who agreed that skin and soft tissue problems were contraindications (78.6%), insufficient soft tissue (98%) and skin (89%) to cover MCGR were specified. Among surgeons who reported curve stiffness as a contraindication (85.9%), there was agreement that this curve stiffness should be defined by clinical evaluation (78.2%) and by traction films (72.3%). Among surgeons who reported sagittal curve characteristics as contraindications, hyperkyphosis (95.3%) and sagittal curve apex above T3 (70%) were specified. Surgeons who indicated the need for repetitive MRI as a contraindication (79.7%) agreed that image quality (72.9%) and not patient safety (13.6%) was the concern. In the entire cohort, consensus was not achieved on the following factors: patient age (57.4%), medical comorbidities (46.4%), etiology (53.6%), and coronal curve characteristics (58.9%).

CONCLUSION

Surgeon consensus suggests that MCGR should be avoided in patients who have insufficient spinal height to accommodate the MCGR, have potential skin and soft tissue inadequacy, have too stiff a spinal curve, have too much kyphosis, and require repetitive MRI, particularly of the spine. Future data-driven studies using this framework are warranted to generate more specific criteria (e.g. specific degrees of kyphosis) to facilitate clinical decision making for EOS patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V-expert opinion.

Intramedullary Fixation of Double-Barrel Vascularised Fibula Grafts With Subsequent Lengthening for Reconstruction of the Distal Femur in Patients With Osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

The use of vascularised fibula grafts is an accepted method for reconstructing the distal femur following resection of malignant childhood tumors. Limitations relate to the mismatch of the cross-sectional area of the transplanted fibula graft and the local bone, instability of the construct and union difficulties. We present midterm results of a unique staged technique-an immediate defect reconstruction using a double-barrel vascularised fibula graft set in in A-frame configuration and a subsequent intramedullary femoral lengthening.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 10 patients (mean age 10 y) with an osteosarcoma of the distal femur, who were treated according to the above-mentioned surgical technique. All patients were evaluated with regards to consolidation of the transplanted grafts, hypertrophy at the graft-host junctions, leg length discrepancies, lengthening indices, complications as well as functional outcome.

RESULTS

The mean defect size after tumor resection was 14.5 cm, the mean length of the harvested fibula graft 22 cm, resulting in a mean (acute) shortening of 4.7 cm (in 8 patients). Consolidation was achieved in all cases, 4 patients required supplementary bone grafting. Hypertrophy at the graft-host junctions was observed in 78% of the evaluable junctions. In total 11 intramedullary lengthening procedures in 9 patients had been performed at the last follow up. The mean Muskuloskeletal Society Rating Scale (MSTS) score of the evaluable 9 patients was 85% (57% to 100%) with good or excellent results in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A-frame vascularised fibula reconstructions showed encouraging results with respect to defect reconstruction, length as well as function and should therefore be considered a valuable option for reconstruction of the distal femur after osteosarcoma resection. The surgical implementation is demanding though, which is emphasized by the considerable high number of complications requiring surgical intervention, even though most were not serious.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

The role of traditional growing rods in the era of magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical and radiographic profile of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with traditional growing rods (TGR) during the magnetically-controlled growing rod (MCGR) era.

METHODS

A US multicenter EOS database was reviewed to identify (1) patients who underwent TGR after MCGR surgery was introduced at their institution, (2) patients who underwent MCGR during the same time period. Of 19 centers, 8 met criteria with all EOS etiologies represented. Clinical notes were reviewed to determine the indication for TGR. Patient demographics and pre-operative radiographs were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 25 TGR and 127 MCGR patients were identified. The TGR patients were grouped by indication into the sagittal plane profile (n = 11), trunk height (n = 6), co-morbidities/need for MRI (n = 4), and other (ex: behavioral issues, remaining growth). Four patients had a combination of sagittal profile and short stature with sagittal profile listed as primary factor. The TGR short trunk group had a mean T1-S1 length of 192 mm vs 273 mm for the MCGR group (p = 0.0002). The TGR sagittal profile group, had a mean maximal kyphosis of 61° vs 55° for the MCGR group (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

TGR continues to have a role in the MCGR era. In this study, the most commonly reported indications for TGR were sagittal plane profile and trunk height. These results suggest that TGR is indicated in patients of short stature with stiff hyperkyphotic curves. As further experience is gained with MCGR, the indications for TGR will likely be refined.

[Nonfusion procedures in pediatric scoliosis]

The treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) in children is a complex and demanding challenge in the treatment of spinal deformities. Conservative treatment with physiotherapy is indicated in mild forms with a Cobb angle from 10° and additionally a corset treatment with a Cobb angle of more than 20°. After exhaustion of the conservative measures or a progression of spinal scoliosis of 10° or deformities of more than 35°, a surgical approach should be considered in order to prevent respiratory insufficiency as well as severe postural and thoracic deformities. In situations where growth is still ongoing fusion operations can lead to stunted growth, a crankshaft phenomenon or degeneration of alignment. Meaningful alternatives to a fusion are so-called growing rods as a distraction-based nonfusion technique, e.g. traditional growing rods (TGR) and magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) or as a further method a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) device. The advantages and disadvantages of each operative procedure must be considered with respect to the risk profile of each patient and the experience of the surgeon in order to guarantee the best possible treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging in children with implants

As access to MRI in pediatrics increases, the radiologist needs to become acquainted with the basic principles of MRI safety. As part of the image acquisition, the static magnetic field, gradient system, and the radiofrequency transmit-receive coil interact with medical and non-medical implants and can result in serious injury. The main stage of risk triage is based on the determination of whether the implant is MRI-safe, conditional, unsafe or unknown. Guiding principles include the strict adherence to manufacturer specifications for MRI-conditional implants and the assumption that an unknown implant is MR-unsafe. In this article we review considerations for common medical implants encountered in pediatrics including ventriculoperitoneal shunts, orthopedic hardware, orthodontic hardware, pacemakers, vascular stents, vagal nerve stimulators and cochlear implants. Finally, we review a set of high-yield considerations, including the non-communicative patient (sedated or non-verbal), susceptibility artifacts from unclear source, and the approach to an unknown implant.

Current status of the magnetically controlled growing rod in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: What we know after a decade of experience

The magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) has had approximately 10 years of clinical experience worldwide. Clinical effectiveness to control early-onset scoliosis is consistent even at final surgery. MCGRs have significantly lower relative percentage of infection or wound complications as compared to traditional growing rods. Most common complications include foundation failure and failure of distraction. Contouring of the rod especially at the proximal segment while accommodating for the straight actuator remains a difficult task and its failure may lead to proximal junctional kyphosis. Unique complications of MCGR include clunking, temporary diminishing distraction gains, and metallosis. Temporary reductions in distraction gains are observed as the MCGR lengthens but return to normal baseline distraction gains after rod exchange. Lack of standardization for rod configuration, distraction strategies and decisions of whether to keep the rods in situ, remove without fusion surgery or to perform spinal fusion at skeletal maturity will require further study.

Surgeon Survey Shows No Adverse Events With MRI in Patients With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGRs)

STUDY DESIGN

Surgeon survey.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) is associated with any adverse events.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Magnetically controlled growing rods have been shown to reduce the need for repeated surgical procedures and improve costs when compared to traditional growing rods, but concerns about MRI compatibility exist. MRIs are often clinically indicated in the EOS population.

METHODS

Pediatric spine surgeons who are members of the Growing Spine Study Group, Children's Spine Study Group, and early international users of this technology were surveyed regarding MRI use after performing MCGR surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 118 surgeons were surveyed. Four surgeons reported that 10 patients had an MRI with an implanted MCGR. Loss of fixation (0%, 0/10), movement of implants (0%, 0/10), unintended lengthening/shortening (0%, 0/10), or noticeable heating of MCGR (0%, 0/10) were not observed. No problems were observed with function of the MCGR following MRI, and a mean of 2.1 mm was obtained at the next lengthening (range, 0.5-3.0 mm). Two patients had brain MRIs, both of which could be interpreted. All cervical spine MRIs could be interpreted without excessive artifact (100%, 7/7). Six patients had MRIs of the thoracic or lumbar spine, but these were considered uninterpretable as a result of artifact from the MCGR device (0%, 0/6).

CONCLUSION

These are the first reported cases of MRI use in humans with MCGR. There were no adverse events observed. MCGR rods lengthened as expected following MRI. MRIs of the brain and cervical spine were able to be interpreted, but MRIs of the thoracolumbar spine could not be interpreted because of MCGR artifact. MRIs can be safely performed in patients with MCGRs; however, MRIs of thoracic and thoracolumbar spine may be of limited clinical benefit because of artifact.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails and MRI Compatibility

BACKGROUND

Magnetic intramedullary nails (IMNs) are fully implantable lengthening devices that became available in the United States in 2011 for the correction of limb length discrepancies. This device represents a major advancement in the field of limb lengthening surgery as it is typically tolerated better than external fixation. Unlike traditional IMNs, surgeons recommend routine removal following limb lengthening. One such reason involves patient safety as it pertains to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Theoretical concerns with MRI exposure include implant migration, implant heating, and involuntary elongation of the lengthening mechanism. Our study seeks to investigate the effects of MRI on intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails.

METHODS

Twenty-five intramedullary magnetic nails were studied. One nail was placed within the magnetic field to measure maximum magnetic force. Nails were then scanned using standard knee MRI protocols, 12 in 3 T and 12 in 1.5 T MRI scanners. The following parameters were measured: (1) distraction of the implants after MRI exposure, (2) temperature before and after MRI, and (3) internal distraction force before and after MRI.

RESULTS

Maximum magnetic force was found to be 2 lbs. There was no involuntary distraction of the implants after MRI. Temperature increase of 3.3°C was found in the femoral nails and 3.6°C in the tibial nails that were exposed to 3 T MRI. This increase did not reach or exceed physiological temperature of 37°C. Distraction force was reduced by 61.7% in the femoral nails and 89.6% in the tibial nails after subjected to 3 T MRI. There was no reduction in distraction force after exposure to 1.5 T MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for routine removal of magnetic IMNs for safety concerns should be reconsidered. Exposure to 3 T MRI should be avoided in patients who are still undergoing lengthening or with plans for future lengthening with magnetic IMNs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To assess patient safety and implant function after magnetic IMNs have been exposed to MRI.

MRI Safety with Orthopedic Implants

The literature within the last 10 years on MRI use in patients with orthopedic implants is reviewed. A literature search returned 15 relevant articles. Only 2 discussed pediatric patients. Overall, significant displacement of implants was infrequent. Radiofrequency-induced heating of implants differed among the studies, but most reported increases of less than 1°C. The authors conclude MRI is safe in patients with orthopedic implants because implant displacement and heating pose little risk to patients. A risk-to-benefit ratio is warranted, however, to assess the clinical utility and necessity of the study. Further research and individual assessment of implant properties and MRI-related interactions are warranted.