Influence of a variation in the position of the arms on the sagittal connection of the gravity line with the spinal structures

Balance, barycentremetry and external shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis: What can the physician expect from it?

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to establish a corridor of normality for the external shape 3D parameters and then to assess these variables in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

Adolescent with mild and severe AIS were included prospectively, as well as a control group of asymptomatic subjects. A quasi-automatic 3D reconstruction of the spine and manual 3D reconstruction of the external envelope was performed from biplanar radiography. The center of mass position, the axial intersegmental moment resulting at the apex and junctional vertebrae, and the coronal trunk balance were automatically computed. A normality corridor of asymptomatic subjects was calculated as the range [5^th-95^th percentiles] for external shape parameters at each vertebral level.

RESULTS

Forty-one asymptomatic subjects (19 females; 22 males; 21 yo, SD=4) and sixty AIS (56 females; 4 males; 13 years old, SD=1.9; 30 mild and 30 severe; 34 thoracic curves and 26 thoraco-lumbar or lumbar curves) were included. All parameters based on the external shape showed differences between AIS and controls, as well as between mild and severe scoliosis. For instance, the intersegmental moment applied to the upper junctional vertebra was above the 95^th percentile of controls in 70% of AIS patient. The percentage of severe patients showing parameters higher than the normality corridor was significantly higher than mild patients (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of center of mass, vertebral intersegmental moment and coronal trunk balance parameters appear to be relevant in characterizing the 3D deformity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The upper junctional intersegmental moment seems to be able to distinguish the different stages of curvature severity.

Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions

Cervical alignment as a concept has come to the forefront for spine deformity research in the last decade. Studies on cervical sagittal alignment started from normative data, and expanded into correlation with global sagittal balance, prognosis of various conditions, outcomes of surgery, definition and classification of cervical deformity, and prediction of targets for ideal cervical reconstruction. Despite the recent robust research efforts, the definition of normal cervical sagittal alignment and cervical spine deformity continues to elude us. Further, many studies continue to view cervical alignment as a continuation of thoracolumbar deformity and do not take into account biomechanical features unique to the cervical spine that may influence cervical alignment, such as the importance of musculature connecting cranium-cervical-thoracic spine and upper extremities. In this article, we aim to summarize the relevant literature on cervical sagittal alignment, discuss key results, and list potential future direction for research using the '5W1H' framework; "WHO" are related?, "WHY" important?, "WHAT" to evaluate and "WHAT" is normal?, "HOW" to evaluate?, "WHEN" to apply sagittal balance?, and "WHERE" to go in the future?

How reproducible do we stand and sit? Indications for a reliable sagittal spinal assessment

BACKGROUND

Currently, an upright standing posture is normally adopted for evaluations of spinal alignment, which is however sensitive to posture variations. Thus, finding a reproducible reference is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of standing and sitting postures at different arm positions in five consecutive repetitions.

METHODS

22 asymptomatic subjects (11 males; 11 females) aged 20-35 years were included. Subjects were repeatedly asked to adopt different arm positions in standing and sitting. The absolute reposition errors of lumbar lordosis and sacral orientation between two consecutive repetitions were assessed with a non-radiological back measurement system.

FINDINGS

During standing at the relaxed arm position, the median absolute reposition errors of lumbar lordosis and sacral orientation were 1.14° (range 0.23°-3.80°) and 0.92° (range 0.17°-3.27°), respectively, which increased to 1.75° (range 0.21-4.97°) and 1.36° (range 0.35°-4.08°) during sitting (P < 0.01). The absolute reposition error of lumbar lordosis was non-significantly lower at the relaxed and clasped arm positions than at other arm positions. Between the first two repetitions, the absolute reposition errors of both, lumbar lordosis and sacral orientation, were greater than between the remaining two consecutive repetitions (P < 0.01). Both during standing and sitting, lumbar lordosis was smallest when hands holding two bars (P < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

Sitting showed a worse reproducibility than standing. When assessing sagittal spinal balance, the clasped arm position during standing is recommended and an initial trial can help to reduce inception irreproducibility.

Global postural re-education in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical modeling and analysis of curve reduction during active and assisted self-correction

Background

Global postural re-education (GPR) is a physiotherapy treatment approach for pediatric idiopathic scoliosis (IS), where the physiotherapist qualitatively assesses scoliotic curvature reduction potential (with a manual correction) and patient’s ability to self-correct (self-correction). To the author’s knowledge, there are no studies regarding GPR applied to IS, hence there is a need to better understand the biomechanics of GPR curve reduction postures. The objective was to biomechanically and quantitatively evaluate those two re-education corrections using a computer model combined with experimental testing.

Methods

Finite elements models of 16 patients with IS (10.5–15.4 years old, average Cobb angle of 33°) where built from surface scans and 3D radiographic reconstructions taken in normal standing and self-corrected postures. The forces applied with the therapist’s hands over the trunk during manual correction were recorded and used in the FEM to simulate this posture. Self-correction was simulated by moving the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae from their presenting position to their self-corrected position as seen on radiographs. A stiffness index was defined for each posture as the global force required to stay in the posture divided by the thoracic curve reduction (force/Cobb angle reduction).

Results

The average force applied by the therapist during manual correction was 31 N and resulted in a simulated average reduction of 26% (p < 0.05), while kyphosis slightly increased and lordosis remained unchanged. The actual self-correction reduced the thoracic curve by an average of 33% (p < 0.05), while the lumbar curve remained unchanged. The thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis were reduced on average by 6° and 5° (p < 0.05). Self-correction simulations correlated with actual self-correction (r = 0.9).

Conclusions

This study allowed quantification of thoracic curve reducibility obtained by external forces applications as well as patient’s capacity to self-correct their posture, two corrections commonly used in the GPR approach.