Radiation exposure to the patients in thoracic and lumbar spine fusion using a new intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography imaging technique: a preliminary study

Integrated Optical and Magnetic Navigation for Simplified Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Novel Approach

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the clinical benefits of the integrated optical and magnetic surgical navigation system in assisting transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent TELD for LDH at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from November 2022 to December 2023. Patients treated with the integrated optical and magnetic surgical navigation system were defined as the navigation-guided TELD (Ng-TELD) group (30 cases), while those treated with the conventional x-ray fluoroscopy method were defined as the control group (31 cases). Record and compare baseline characteristics, surgical parameters, efficacy indicators, and adverse events between the 2 patient groups.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration for the 61 patients was 11.8 months. Postoperatively, both groups exhibited significant relief from back and leg pain, which continued to improve over time. At the final follow-up, patients' lumbar function and quality of life had significantly improved compared to preoperative levels (p < 0.05). The Ng-TELD group had significantly shorter total operation time (58.43 ± 12.37 minutes vs. 83.23 ± 25.90 minutes), catheter placement time (5.83 ± 1.09 minutes vs. 15.94 ± 3.00 minutes), decompression time (47.17 ± 11.98 minutes vs. 67.29 ± 24.23 minutes), and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies (3.20 ± 1.45 vs. 16.58 ± 4.25) compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of efficacy evaluation indicators and hospital stay. At the final follow-up, the excellent and good rate of surgical outcomes assessed by the MacNab criteria was 98.4%, and the overall adverse event rate was 8.2%, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the integrated optical and magnetic surgical navigation system can reduce the complexity of TELD, shorten operation time, and minimize radiation exposure for the surgeon, highlighting its promising clinical potential.

Low Radiation Protocol for Intraoperative Robotic C-Arm Can Enhance Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Deformity Correction Accuracy and Safety

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-series study.

OBJECTIVES

To assess (1) low cone beam CT (CBCT) mediated intraoperative navigation to limit radiation exposure without compromising surgical accuracy, and (2) the potential of intraoperative C-arm CBCT navigation to augment pedicle screw (PS) placement accuracy in AIS surgery compared to pre-surgery CT-based planning.

METHODS

The first part involved a prospective phantom study, comparing radiation doses for conventional CT, and standard (6sDCT) and a low dose (5sDCT) Artis Zeego®-imaging. Next, 5sDCT- and 6sDCT-navigation were compared on PS accuracy and radiation exposure during AIS correction. The final part compared surgical AIS deformity correction through intraoperative 5sDCT navigation to a matched cohort treated using conventional pre-surgery CT-scans for navigation. Outcome parameters included operation time, skin dose (SD), dose area product (DAP), intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and PS deviation rates.

RESULTS

The phantom study demonstrated a reduction in radiation for the 5sDCT protocol. Moreover, 5sDCT-imaged patients (n = 15) showed a significantly lower SD (-27.41%) and DAP (-30.92%), without compromising PS accuracy compared with 6sDCT-settings (n = 15). Finally, AIS correction through intraoperative CBCT C-arm navigation (n = 27) significantly reduced screw deviation rates (6.83% versus 10.75%, P = .016) without increasing operation times, compared with conventional CT (n = 37).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative navigation using a CBCT C-arm system improved the accuracy of PS insertion and reduced surgery time. Moreover, it reduced radiation exposure compared with conventional CT, which was further curtailed by adapting the low-dose 5sDCT protocol. In short, our study highlights the benefits of intraoperative CBCT navigation for PS placement in AIS surgery.

The use of hybrid operating rooms in neurosurgery, advantages, disadvantages, and future perspectives: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hybrid operating rooms (hybrid-ORs) combine the functionalities of a conventional surgical theater with the advanced imaging technologies of a radiological suite. Hybrid-ORs are usually equipped with CBCT devices providing both 2D and 3D imaging capability that can be used for both interventional radiology and image guided surgical applications. Across all fields of surgery, the use of hybrid-ORs is gaining in traction, and neurosurgery is no exception. We hence aimed to comprehensively review the use of hybrid-ORs, the associated advantages, and disadvantages specific to the field of neurosurgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for all studies on hybrid-ORs from inception to May 2022. Findings of matching studies were pooled to strengthen the current body of evidence.

RESULTS

Seventy-four studies were included in this review. Hybrid-ORs were mainly used in endovascular surgery (n = 41) and spine surgery (n = 33). Navigation systems were the most common additional technology employed along with the CBCT systems in the hybrid-ORs. Reported advantages of hybrid-ORs included immediate assessment of outcomes, reduced surgical revision rate, and the ability to perform combined open and endovascular procedures, among others. Concerns about increased radiation exposure and procedural time were some of the limitations mentioned.

CONCLUSION

In the field of neurosurgery, the use of hybrid-ORs for different applications is increasing. Hybrid-ORs provide preprocedure, intraprocedure, and end-of-procedure imaging capabilities, thereby increasing surgical precision, and reducing the need for postoperative imaging and correction surgeries. Despite these advantages, radiation exposure to patient and staff is an important concern.

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Assessment of Pedicle Screw Accuracy in Clinical Utilization of a New Robotic System in Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in patients undergoing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with robotic guidance, using a newly developed 3-dimensional quantitative measurement system. The study also aimed to assess the clinical feasibility of the robotic system in the field of spinal surgery.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients underwent pedicle screw insertion using the CUVIS-spine pedicle screw guide system (CUREXO Inc.). Intraoperative O-arm images were obtained, and screw insertion pathways were planned accordingly. Image registration was performed using paired-point registration and iterative closest point methods. The accuracy of the robotic-guided pedicle screw insertion was assessed using 3-dimensional offset calculation and the Gertzbein-Robbins system (GRS).

RESULTS

A total of 448 screws were inserted in the 113 patients. The image registration success rate was 95.16%. The average error of entry offset was 2.86 mm, target offset was 2.48 mm, depth offset was 1.99 mm, and angular offset was 3.07°. According to the GRS grading system, 88.39% of the screws were classified as grade A, 9.60% as grade B, 1.56% as grade C, 0.22% as grade D, and 0.22% as grade E. Clinically acceptable screws (GRS grade A or B) accounted for 97.54% of the total, with no reported neurologic complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that pedicle screw insertion using the novel robot-assisted navigation method is both accurate and safe. Further prospective studies are necessary to explore the potential benefits of this robot-assisted technique in comparison to conventional approaches.

Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Spinal Pedicle Screws Placement Precision Is in Full Agreement with Postoperative Computed Tomography Assessment

OBJECTIVE

To assess agreement between pedicle screw placement evaluated on postoperative computed tomography (CT) and on intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) and compare procedure characteristics when using first-generation and second-generation robotic C-arm systems in the hybrid operating room.

METHODS

All patients who received pedicle screws for spinal fusion at our institution between June 2009 and September 2019 and underwent intraoperative CBCT and postoperative CT were included. The CBCT and CT images were reviewed by 2 surgeons to assess the screw placement using the Gertzbein-Robbins and the Heary classifications. Intermethod agreement of screw placement classifications as well as interrater agreement were assessed using Brennan-Prediger and Gwet agreement coefficients. Procedure characteristics using first-generation and second-generation generation robotic C-arm systems were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were treated with 315 pedicle screws at thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels. No screw had to be repositioned. On CBCT, accurate placement was found for 309 screws (98.1%) using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification and 289 (91.7%) using the Heary classification and on CT, these were 307 (97.4%) and 293 (93.0%), respectively. Intermethod between CBCT and CT and interrater agreements between the 2 raters were almost perfect (>0.90) for all assessment. There were no significant differences in mean radiation dose (P = 0.83) and fluoroscopy time (P = 0.82), but length of surgery using the second-generation system was estimated at 107.7 minutes (95% confidence interval, 31.9-183.5 minutes; P = 0.006) shorter.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative CBCT provides accurate assessment of pedicle screw placement and enables intraoperative repositioning of misplaced screws.

Can intraoperative radiation dose in percutaneous posterior thoracolumbar internal fixation be reduced by impedancemetry-guided pedicle sighting? A prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous spine surgery is on the rise; the main drawback is iterative irradiation of the care team in theater. The aim of the present study was to compare intraoperative radiation dose in percutaneous posterior thoracolumbar internal fixation (PPTLIF) using impedancemetry-guided pedicle sighting by the PediGuard device (SpineGuard®) versus gold-standard free-hand sighting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center, single-surgeon continuous prospective randomized study was conducted from September 2017 to April 2018. Dose-area product (DAP, in cGy.cm²) was recorded at the end of pedicle sighting and end of surgery in the free-hand control group and the impedancemetry group. Pedicle screw position was studied on postoperative CT scan.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included in either group after 2 had been excluded. The groups were comparable for age, gender, body-mass index (BMI), indication and number of instrumented levels. Mean DPA at end of sighting and end of procedure was respectively 147.4 cGy.cm² and 230.9 cGy.cm² in the control group and 171.1 cGy.cm² and 280.7 cGy.cm² in the PediGuard group (p> 0.05). Screw positioning on CT was comparable in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, the PediGuard device did not reduce intraoperative radiation dose. The correlation between radiation dose and BMI was confirmed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; prospective randomized study.

Comparison of the Accuracy and Safety of TiRobot-Assisted and Fluoroscopy-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Studies have compared the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted techniques for inserting conventional open pedicle screws for spinal surgery. However, no relevant studies have confirmed that robot-assisted percutaneous screw placement is better than fluoroscopic percutaneous screw placement for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. This study compared the accuracy and safety of TiRobot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement with those of the fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 126 patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Sixty-five patients were treated with the TiRobot-assisted technique and 61 patients were treated with the fluoroscopy-assisted technique. Patient demographics, accuracy of screw placement (according to the Gertzbein and Robbins scale of grades A to E), screw insertion angle, radiation exposure, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, incision length, hospital expenses, surgical site infection, and neurological injury of the TiRobot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted groups were compared using Student's t-test, Pearson χ² test, or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 729 screws were placed (TiRobot-assisted group: 374 screws; fluoroscopy-assisted group: 355 screws). In the TiRobot-assisted group, 82.8% of screws were optimally positioned (grade A); however, the placement grades of the remaining screws were categorized as grade B (13.3%), grade C (3.2%), and grade D (0.5%). In the fluoroscopy-assisted group, 66.7% of the screws were optimally positioned (grade A); however, the placement grades of the remaining screws were categorized as grade B (21.4%), grade C (7.6%), grade D (3.6%), and grade E (0.5%). The proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grade A or B) was greater in the TiRobot-assisted group than in the fluoroscopy-assisted group. Additionally, the TiRobot-assisted group had a significantly larger mean screw insertion angle (22.27° ± 5.48° vs 20.55° ± 5.15°), larger incision length (13.86 ± 1.24 cm vs 12.77 ± 1.43 cm), and higher hospital expenses (69061.55 ± 7166.60 yuan vs 59383.85 ± 5019.64 yuan) than the fluoroscopy-assisted group. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and rates of surgical site infection and neurological injury in both groups (p > 0.05). However, the TiRobot-assisted group had significantly better surgical times, radiation times, and radiation exposure than the fluoroscopy-assisted group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous TiRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a safe, useful, and potentially more accurate alternative to the percutaneous fluoroscopy-assisted technique for treating thoracolumbar fractures.

Cone-Beam Navigation Can Reduce the Radiation Exposure and Save Fusion Length-Dependent Operation Time in Comparison to Conventional Fluoroscopy in Pedicle-Screw-Based Lumbar Interbody Fusion

This study investigates the advantages and disadvantages of cone-beam-based navigated standardized posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery (PLIF), regarding the radiation exposure and perioperative time management, compared to the use of fluoroscopy. Patients treated receiving an elective one- to three-level PLIF were retrospectively enrolled in the study. The surgery time, preparation time, operation room time, and effective dose (mSv) were analyzed for comparison of the radiation exposure and time consumption between cone-beam and fluoroscopy; Results: 214 patients were included (108 cone-beam navigated, and 106 traditional fluoroscopies). Using cone-beam navigation, reductions in the effective dose (2.23 ± 1.96 mSv vs. 3.39 ± 2.32 mSv, p = 0.002) and mean surgery time of 30 min (143.62 ± 43.87 min vs. 171.10 ± 48.91 min, p < 0.001) were demonstrated, which leveled out the extended preparation time of 7−8 min (37.25 ± 9.99 min vs. 29.65 ± 7.69 min, p < 0.001). These effects were fusion length dependent and demonstrated additional benefits in multisegmental surgeries. The cone-beam navigation system led to a reduction in the perioperative time requirements and radiation exposure. Furthermore, the controversially discussed longer preparation time when using cone-beam navigation was amortized by a shortened surgery time, especially in multilevel surgery.

Comparison of novel machine vision spinal image guidance system with existing 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system: a randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The use of spinal image guidance systems (IGS) has increased patient safety, accuracy, operative efficiency, and reduced revision rates in pedicle screw placement procedures. Traditional intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy or CT imaging produces potentially harmful ionizing radiation and increases operative time to register the patient. An IGS, FLASH Navigation, uses machine vision through high resolution stereoscopic cameras and structured visible light to build a 3D topographical map of the patient's bony surface anatomy enabling navigation use without ionizing radiation.

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare FLASH navigation system to a widely used 3D fluoroscopic navigation (3D) platform by comparing radiation exposure and pedicle screw accuracy.

DESIGN

A randomized prospective comparative cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing open posterior lumbar instrumented fusion.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adults diagnosed with spinal pathology requiring surgical treatment and planning for open posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws implanted into 1-4 vertebral levels.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time and dose, mean CT dose length product (DLP) for preoperative and day 2 CT, pedicle screw accuracy by CT, estimated blood loss and revision surgery rate.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were randomized 1:1 to FLASH or 3D and underwent posterior lumbar instrumented fusion. Radiation doses were recorded from pre- and postoperative CT and intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy. 2 independent blinded radiologists reviewed pedicle screw accuracy on CT.

RESULTS

A total of 429 (n=210 FLASH, n=219 3D) pedicle screws were placed in 90 patients (n=45 FLASH, n=45 3D) over the 18-month study period. Mean age and indication for surgery were similar between both groups, with a non-significantly higher ratio of males in the 3D group. Mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time and doses were significantly reduced in FLASH compared to 3D (4.51±3.71s vs 79.6±23.0s, p<.001 and 80.9±68.1cGycm² vs 3704.1±3442.4 cGycm², p<.001, respectively). This represented a relative reduction of 94.3% in the total intraoperative radiation time and a 97.8% reduction in the total intraoperative radiation dose. Mean preoperative CT DLP and mean day 2 postoperative CT DLP were significantly reduced in FLASH compared to 3D (662.0±440.4mGy-cm vs 1008.9±616.3 mGy-cm, p<.001 and 577.9±294.3 mGy-cm vs 980.7±441.6 mGy-cm, p<.001, respectively). This represented relative reductions of 34.4% and 41.0% in the preoperative CT dose and postoperative total DLP, respectively. The FLASH group required an average of 1.2 registrations in each case with an average of 2447 (±961.3) data points registered with a mean registration time of 106s (±52.1). A rapid re-registration mechanism was utilized in 22% (n=10/45) of cases and took 22.7s (±11.3). Re-registration was used in 7% (n=3/45) in the 3D group. Pedicle screw accuracy was high in FLASH (98.1%) and 3D (97.3%) groups with no pedicle breach >2mm in either group (p<.001). EBL was not statistically different between the groups (p=.38). No neurovascular injuries occurred, and no patients required return to theatre for screw repositioning.

CONCLUSIONS

FLASH and 3D IGS demonstrate high accuracy for pedicle screw placement. FLASH showed significant reduction in intraoperative radiation time and dose with lower but non-significant blood loss. FLASH showed significant reduction in preoperative and postoperative radiation, but this may be associated to the lower number of males/females preponderance in this group. FLASH provides similar accuracy to contemporary IGS without requiring 3D-fluoroscopy or radiolucent operating tables. Reducing registration time and specialized equipment may reduce costs.

Emerging Issues Questioning the Current Treatment Strategies for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Lumbar disc herniation is among the common phenotypes of degenerative lumbar spine diseases, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. The practice pattern is diverse. Choosing conservative measures or surgical treatments is still controversial in some areas. For those who have failed conservative treatment, surgery with or without instrumentation is recommended, causing significant expenditures and frustrating complications, that should not be ignored. In the article, we performed a literature review and summarized the evidence by subheadings to unravel the cons of surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation. There are tetrad critical issues about surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation, i.e., favorable natural history, insufficient evidence in a recommendation of fusion surgery for patients, metallosis, and implant removal. Firstly, accumulating evidence reveals immune privilege and auto-immunity hallmarks of human lumbar discs within the closed niche. Progenitor cells within human discs further expand the capacity with the endogenous repair. Clinical watchful follow-up studies with repeated diagnostic imaging reveal spontaneous resolution for lumbar disc herniation, even calcified tissues. Secondly, emerging evidence indicates long-term complications of lumbar fusion, such as adjacent segment disease, pseudarthrosis, implant failure, and sagittal spinal imbalance, which get increasing attention. Thirdly, systemic and local reactions (metallosis) for metal instrumentation have been noted with long-term health concerns and toxicity. Fourthly, the indications and timing for spinal implant removal have not reached a consensus. Other challenging issues include postoperative lumbar stiffness. The review provided evidence from a negative perspective for surgeons and patients who attempt to choose surgical treatment. Collectively, the emerging underlying evidence questions the benefits of traditional surgery for patients with lumbar disc herniation. Therefore, the long-term effects of surgery should be closely observed. Surgical decisions should be made prudently for each patient.

Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques and the Influence of Patient and Procedural Factors

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to elucidate the relative influence of multiple factors on radiation usage for anterior, lateral, and posterior based lumbar interbody fusion techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There has been substantial global growth in the performance of lumbar interbody fusions, due to evolution of techniques and approaches and increased attention to sagittal alignment. Utilization of intraoperative imaging guidance has similarly expanded, with a predominance of fluoroscopy and consequent increased radiation exposure. There have been no larger-scale studies examining the role of patient and procedural factors in driving radiation exposure across different interbody techniques.

METHODS

We used a clinical registry to review all single-level lumbar interbody fusions performed between January 2016 and October 2020. Operative records were reviewed for the amount of radiation exposure during the procedure. Patient age, biologic sex, body mass index (BMI), operative surgeon, surgical level, surgical time, and fusion technique were recorded. Multivariable adjusted analyses using negative binomial regression were used to account for confounding.

RESULTS

We included 134 interbody fusions; 80 performed with a posterior approach (TLIF/PLIF), 43 via an anterior approach (ALIF) with posterior pedicle fixation, and 9 performed with a lateral approach (LLIF/XLIF). Average radiation per case was 136.4 mGy (SE 17.3) for ALIF, 108.6 mGy (16.9) for LLIF/XLIF, and 60.5 mGy (7.4) for TLIF/PLIF. We identified lateral approaches, increased BMI, minimally invasive techniques, and more caudal operative levels as significantly associated with increased radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION

We identified several novel drivers of radiation exposure during interbody fusion procedures, including the relative importance of technique and the level at which the fusion is performed. More caudal levels of intervention and lateral based techniques had significantly greater radiation exposure.Level of Evidence: 4.

Effective dose of radiation per screw in surgery of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: matched pair analysis of 293 pedicle screws inserted using three different techniques

PURPOSE

Reports on heterogenous groups of patients have indicated that pedicle screw insertion guided by navigation (PIN) leads to, for the patient, higher doses of radiation compared with pedicle screw insertion guided by fluoroscopy (PIF). This would be a major concern, especially in paediatric deformity correction.

METHODS

After a power analysis (aiming at > 0.8) 293 pedicle screws which were inserted in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were analyzed by comparing effective dose and fluoroscopy time per screw for three different techniques. Groups 2 and 3 were matched to Group 1 by Lenke type of scoliosis. Group 1 were prospectively enrolled consecutive patients that have been operated on by PIN with image acquisition by preoperative CT scan (CTS). Group 2 were consecutive retrospectively matched patients who have been operated on by PIN with image acquisition by an intraoperative 3D scan (3DS). Group 3 were consecutive retrospectively matched patients who have been operated on by PIF.

RESULTS

Mean dose of radiation per screw was 1.0 mSv (sd 0.8) per screw in CTS patients, 0.025 mSv (sd 0.001) per screw in 3DS patients and 0.781 mSv (sd 0.12) per screw in PIF patients. The difference was significant (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

When we compared different techniques of navigation, navigation by image acquisition with CTS showed a significantly higher (by 97.5%) dose of radiation per screw for the patient than navigation by image acquisition by a 3DS. Navigation by 3DS showed significantly lower effective dose per screw for the adolescent patients than the fluoroscopic technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease: a meta-analysis

Aims

The aim of this study was to systematically compare the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted (RA) technique with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted (CT) pedicle screw insertion for spine disease.

Methods

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the safety and accuracy of RA compared with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion for spine disease from 2012 to 2019. This meta-analysis used Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance method with mixed-effects model for heterogeneity, calculating the odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, and risk of bias were analyzed.

Results

Ten RCTs with 713 patients and 3,331 pedicle screws were included. Compared with CT, the accuracy rate of RA was superior in Grade A with statistical significance and Grade A + B without statistical significance. Compared with CT, the operating time of RA was longer. The difference between RA and CT was statistically significant in radiation dose. Proximal facet joint violation occurred less in RA than in CT. The postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of RA was smaller than that of CT, and there were some interesting outcomes in our subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

RA technique could be viewed as an accurate and safe pedicle screw implantation method compared to CT. A robotic system equipped with optical intraoperative navigation is superior to CT in accuracy. RA pedicle screw insertion can improve accuracy and maintain stability for some challenging areas.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(10):653-666.

Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Spine Surgery to Minimize Staff Radiation Exposure

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess staff and patient radiation exposure during augmented reality surgical navigation in spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical navigation in combination with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging has been shown to significantly increase the clinical accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Although this technique may increase the total radiation exposure compared with fluoroscopy, the occupational exposure can be minimized, as navigation is radiation free and staff can be positioned behind protective shielding during three-dimensional imaging. The patient radiation exposure during treatment and verification of pedicle screw positions can also be reduced.

METHODS

Twenty patients undergoing spine surgery with pedicle screw placement were included in the study. The staff radiation exposure was measured using real-time active personnel dosimeters and was further compared with measurements using a reference dosimeter attached to the C-arm (i.e., a worst-case staff exposure situation). The patient radiation exposures were recorded, and effective doses (ED) were determined.

RESULTS

The average staff exposure per procedure was 0.21 ± 0.06 μSv. The average staff-to-reference dose ratio per procedure was 0.05% and decreased to less than 0.01% after a few procedures had been performed. The average patient ED was 15.8 ± 1.8 mSv which mainly correlated with the number of vertebrae treated and the number of cone-beam computed tomography acquisitions performed. A low-dose protocol used for the final 10 procedures yielded a 32% ED reduction per spinal level treated.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated significantly lower occupational doses compared with values reported in the literature. Real-time active personnel dosimeters contributed to a fast optimization and adoption of protective measures throughout the study. Even though our data include both cone-beam computed tomography for navigation planning and intraoperative screw placement verification, we find low patient radiation exposure levels compared with published data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion: systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Minimally invasive spine techniques are becoming increasingly popular owing to their ability to reduce operative morbidity and recovery times. The downside to these new procedures is their need for intraoperative radiation guidance.

PURPOSE

To establish which technologies provide the lowest radiation exposure to both patient and surgeon.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review OUTCOME MEASURES: Average intraoperative radiation exposure (in mSv per screw placed) to surgeon and patient. Average fluoroscopy time per screw placed.

METHODS

We reviewed the available English medical literature to identify all articles reporting patient and/or surgeon radiation exposure in patients undergoing image-guided thoracolumbar instrumentation. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed for studies providing radiation exposure or fluoroscopy use per screw placed to determine which navigation modality was associated with the lowest intraoperative radiation exposure. Values on meta-analysis were reported as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

We identified 4956 unique articles, of which 85 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Forty-one articles were included in the meta-analysis. Patient radiation exposure per screw placed for each modality was: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (0.26±0.38 mSv), conventional fluoroscopy with pre-operative CT-based navigation (0.027±0.010 mSv), intraoperative CT-based navigation (1.20±0.91 mSv), and robot-assisted instrumentation (0.04±0.30 mSv). Values for fluoroscopy used per screw were: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (11.1±9.0 seconds), conventional fluoroscopy with navigation (7.20±3.93 s), 3D fluoroscopy (16.2±9.6 s), intraoperative CT-based navigation (19.96±17.09 s), and robot-assistance (20.07±17.22 s). Surgeon dose per screw: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (6.0±7.9 × 10^-3 mSv), conventional fluoroscopy with navigation (1.8±2.5 × 10^-3 mSv), 3D Fluoroscopy (0.3±1.9 × 10^-3 mSv), intraoperative CT-based navigation (0±0 mSv), and robot-assisted instrumentation (2.0±4.0 × 10^-3 mSv).

CONCLUSION

All image guidance modalities are associated with surgeon radiation exposures well below current safety limits. Intraoperative CT-based (iCT) navigation produces the lowest radiation exposure to surgeon albeit at the cost of increased radiation exposure to the patient relative to conventional fluoroscopy-based methods.

Individualized Strategies for Intraoperative Localization of Non-palpable Pulmonary Nodules in a Hybrid Operating Room

Background: Precise preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules is a key prerequisite to their successful excision. With the advent of hybrid operating rooms (HORs), a patient-tailored approach encompassing simultaneous localization and removal of small pulmonary nodules has become feasible. In this study, we describe our individualized image-guided video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (iVATS) strategies implemented within a HOR environment. Specifically, localization was performed through different marking approaches (single- vs. double-marker) and access routes [percutaneous technique with Dyna-computed tomography (DynaCT) imaging vs. electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)]. Methods: Between April 2017 and November 2018, a total of 159 consecutive patients (harboring 174 pulmonary nodules) were treated with iVATS. The marking approach and access route were individually tailored according to lesion localization and its distance from the pleural surface. The efficacy and safety of our iVATS technique were determined through a retrospective review of clinical charts. Results: All of the localization procedures were performed in a HOR by a single team of thoracic surgeons. The mean tumor size on preoperative CT was 8.28 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-8.96 mm), whereas their mean distance from the pleural surface was 9.44 mm (95% CI: 8.11-10.77 mm). Of the 174 tumors, 150 were localized through a percutaneous DynaCT-guided approach (single-marker: 139, dual-marker: 11), whereas localization in the remaining 24 was accomplished via the ENB-guided approach (single-marker: 4; dual-marker: 20). The mean localization time was 17.78 min (95% CI:16.17-19.39 min). The overall localization success rate was 95.9%. We failed to localize a total of seven nodules either because of technical complications (pneumothorax, n = 3; microcoil dislodgement; n = 1) or machine failure (n = 3). No operative deaths were observed, and the mean length of postoperative stay was 3.65 days (95% CI: 3.19-4.11 days). Conclusions: The use of tailored marking approaches and access routes allowed us to individualize the iVATS procedure for small pulmonary nodules, ultimately promoting a more patient-centered workflow.

Navigation Versus Fluoroscopy in Multilevel MIS Pedicle Screw Insertion: Separate Analysis of Exposure to Radiation of the Surgeon and of the Patients

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a retrospective radiographic analysis of consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze exposure to radiation of the surgeon and-separately-of patients in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of multilevel posterior stabilization by percutaneous pedicle screw insertion guided by navigation (PIN) versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion guided by fluoroscopy (PIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spine surgeons are exposed to a 12-fold higher dose of radiation than other nonspinal musculoskeletal surgeons and PIF in MIS leads to a 2-fold higher dose of radiation than in open surgery. PIN might reduce the dose of radiation for the surgeon and the patient, especially in multilevel MIS surgery. To the best of our knowledge, there are only rare data of short-segment fusions that do not focus on exposure to radiation of surgeons.

METHODS

After power analysis, we included 205 consecutive screws (22 patients). We monitored dose of radiation (recorded separately for patient and surgeon), accuracy of screw placement, time of operation, and approach-related complications.

RESULTS

In PIN, only 58.7% of dose area product (cGy×cm) per screw of PIF was determined for patients (P<0.01). The surgeon was only exposed to 19.9% of radiation per screw in PIN compared with dosage in PIF (P<0.01). Four of 205 screws (2.0%) were classified as being incorrectly positioned: 2 of 87 screws (2.3%) in PIF and 2 of 118 screws (1.7%) in PIN (P>0.05). We did not observe any wound infections.

CONCLUSIONS

PIN in MIS is a safe procedure and does, compared with PIF, lead to significant reduction of radiation dose for patients and-even more-for spine surgeons.

Feasibility study of intraoperative cone-beam CT navigation for benign bone tumour surgery

Background

Intraoperative cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers the advantage of navigation on the current anatomical situation and the possibility to take a control scan. We assessed the feasibility of using intraoperative CBCT for navigated intralesional curettage.

Methods

Nine benign bone tumour patients were studied. Feasibility was assessed by describing the workflow and indications for navigation, scoring CBCT image quality and registration accuracy, and measuring scan and navigation set‐up times. Short‐term follow‐up was described.

Results

CBCT navigation was successful in all patients. Median tumour visibility, tumour delineation, and vital structure visibility scores were good. Median registration accuracy score was very good. Median scan and verification times were 5 and 3 minutes, respectively. One patient had a tumour recurrence after 6 months.

Conclusions

Intraoperative CBCT navigation is feasible and safe. Indications for use of navigation in clinical practice are closeness to vital structures, complexly shaped tumours or bone, minimally invasive surgery, and repeated surgery.

Radiation Exposure and Operation Time in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using Fluoroscopy-Based Navigation System

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated radiation exposure and operation time of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) by using a fluoroscopy-based navigation system for access and localization.

METHODS

Eighty-six PELDs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were separated into 2 groups: group A (using a three-dimensional [3D]-printed navigation instrument and fluoroscopy-based navigation system) and group B (with conventional fluoroscopy and standard instrumentation). The operation, fluoroscopy, and total access time were collected, as well as fluoroscopy and access times.

RESULTS

The operative time for group A was 59 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 6 minutes) and 106 minutes (SD, 15 minutes) in group B (P < 0.001). In group A, fluoroscopy was used an average of 5 times (SD, 0.7) and 29 times (SD, 8) in group B (P < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time was 9 minutes (SD, 2 minutes) in group A and 40 minutes (SD, 8 minutes) in group B (P < 0.001). The number of access attempts was 1.3 (SD, 0.5) in group A and 8 (SD, 2 times) in group B (P < 0.001). The total access time was 11 minutes (SD, 2 minutes) in group A and 28 minutes (SD, 5 minutes) in group B (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PELD using the fluoroscopy-based navigation system showed lower operative, fluoroscopy, and access time compared with conventional techniques. In addition, fewer fluoroscopy images and access attempts were made in the navigation group. These data suggest that this novel technique reduces fluoroscopy and operation time and may reduce risks of repeated surgical access attempts.

Radiation exposure to the surgeon during minimally invasive spine procedures is directly estimated by patient dose

PURPOSE

Radiation exposure is a necessary component of minimally invasive spine procedures to augment limited visualization of anatomy. The surgeon's exposure to ionizing radiation is not easily recognizable without a digital dosimeter-something few surgeons have access to. The aim of this study was to identify an easy alternative method that uses the available radiation dose data from the C-arm to accurately predict physician exposure.

METHODS

The senior surgeon wore a digital dosimeter during all minimally invasive spine fusion procedures performed over a 12-month period. Patient demographics, procedure information, and radiation exposure throughout the procedure were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-five minimally invasive spine fusions utilizing 330 percutaneous screws were included. Average radiation dose was 0.46 Rad/screw to the patient. Average radiation exposure to the surgeon was 1.06 ± 0.71 μSv/screw, with a strong positive correlation (r = 0.77) to patient dose. The coefficient of determination (r²) was 0.5928, meaning almost two-thirds of the variability in radiation exposure to the surgeon is explained by radiation exposure to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-operative radiation exposure to the patient, which is easily identifiable as a continuously updated fluoroscopic monitor, is a reliable predictor of radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous screw placement in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery and therefore can provide an estimate of exposure without the use of a dosimeter. With this, a surgeon can better understand the magnitude of their exposure on a case-by-case basis rather than on a quarterly basis, or more likely, not at all. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Accuracy of a new intraoperative cone beam CT imaging technique (Artis zeego II) compared to postoperative CT scan for assessment of pedicle screws placement and breaches detection

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of a novel intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging technique with that of conventional computed tomography (CT) scans for assessment of pedicle screw placement and breach detection.

METHODS

Three hundred and forty-eight pedicle screws were inserted in 58 patients between October 2013 and March 2016. All patients had an intraoperative CBCT scan and a conventional CT scan to verify the placement of the screws. The CBCT and CT images were reviewed by two surgeons to assess the accuracy of screw placement and detect pedicle breaches using two established classification systems. Agreement on screw placement between intraoperative CBCT and postoperative CT was assessed using Kappa and Gwet's coefficients. Using CT scanning as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to determine the ability of CBCT imaging to accurately evaluate screw placement.

RESULTS

The Kappa coefficient was 0.78 using the Gertzbein classification and 0.80 using the Heary classification, indicating a substantial agreement between the intraoperative CBCT and postoperative CT images. Gwet's coefficient was 0.94 for both classifications, indicating almost perfect agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the CBCT images were 77, 98, 86, and 96%, respectively, for the Gertzbein classification and 79, 98, 88, and 96%, respectively, for the Heary classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative CBCT provides accurate assessment of pedicle screw placement and enables intraoperative repositioning of misplaced screws. This technique may make postoperative CT imaging unnecessary.