A novel technique of cervical pedicle screw placement with a pilot screw under the guidance of intraoperative 3D imaging from C-arm cone-beam CT without navigation for safe and accurate insertion

Accuracy and Safety Assessment of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Given increasing use of both cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation in the subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7) and emerging navigation technologies, a quantitative profile of safety and accuracy remains wanting. Compared with lateral mass instrumentation of this region, CPS fixation shows superior biomechanical properties but poses higher risk of complications because of the narrow cervical pedicle width and proximity to neurovascular structures.

PURPOSE

This systematic review quantifies the accuracy and safety of all types of subaxial CPS insertion, with or without navigation or template-based methods, to weigh the strengths and limitations of each technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients who underwent CPS instrumentation since its introduction.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary and secondary outcomes in our review included pedicle screw breach in the subaxial cervical spine determined on intra- or postoperative imaging, and screw-related operative complications, respectively.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, our literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases identified 3,312 clinical studies (1980-2024) using subaxial CPS that assessed for screw accuracy. After full-text analysis, data extracted included number of CPS, level of placement, number of patients, indications, insertion techniques, accuracy assessment method, classification of accuracy, breach rate, complication rate, and study origin.

RESULTS

The 73 studies included in final analysis from Asia (80%), Europe (12%) and North America (8%) yielded 14,118 CPS in 3,342 patients (1999-2024). Accuracy rates were 85.3% for 10,108 CPS placed with non-navigated techniques (free-hand and fluoroscopy), 82.7% for 3,067 with navigation techniques, and 96.3% for 943 CPS placed using 3D templates. Complication rates were 1.1%, 2.1%, and zero, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our comprehensive review of more than 14,000 subaxial CPSs inserted found rates of high 84% overall accuracy and low 1.2% perioperative complications (i.e., attributed to a misplaced screw). With biomechanical advantages superior to lateral mass screws, our quantitative findings support consideration for CPS instrumentation in select patients by experienced surgeons.

Comparison of Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy With Robotic Guidance System Versus Image Guidance System Using Propensity Score Matching

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using a robotic guidance system (RGS) with that of using an image guidance system (IGS; navigation system) through propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND

The RGS may provide accurate CPS placement, which may outperform IGS. However, no study has directly compared the accuracy of CPS placement with the RGS to that with the IGS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who had undergone cervical fusion surgery using CPS with the RGS or IGS. To adjust for potential confounders (patient demographic characteristics, disease etiology, and registration material), propensity score matching was performed, creating robotic guidance (RG) and matched image guidance (IG) groups. The accuracy of CPS placement from C2 to C6, where the vertebral artery runs, was evaluated on postoperative computed tomography images according to the Neo classification (grade 0 to grade 3). Furthermore, the intraoperative CPS revisions and related complications were examined.

RESULTS

Using propensity score matching, 22 patients were included in the RG and matched groups each, and a total of 95 and 105 CPSs, respectively, were included in the analysis. In both the axial and sagittal planes, the clinically acceptable rate (grades 0 + 1) of CPS placement did not differ between the RG and matched IG groups (97.9% vs 94.3% and 95.8% vs 96.2%, respectively). The incidence of CPS revision was similar between the groups (2.1% vs 2.9%), and no CPS-related complications were documented. Meanwhile, the incidence of lateral breach (grades 1 + 2 + 3) was significantly lower in the RG group than in the matched IG group (1.1% vs 7.7%, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

The RGS and IGS can equally aid in accurate and safe CPS placement in clinical settings. Nonetheless, RGS can further reduce the lateral breach, compared with IGS.

Low Radiation Protocol for Intraoperative Robotic C-Arm Can Enhance Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Deformity Correction Accuracy and Safety

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-series study.

OBJECTIVES

To assess (1) low cone beam CT (CBCT) mediated intraoperative navigation to limit radiation exposure without compromising surgical accuracy, and (2) the potential of intraoperative C-arm CBCT navigation to augment pedicle screw (PS) placement accuracy in AIS surgery compared to pre-surgery CT-based planning.

METHODS

The first part involved a prospective phantom study, comparing radiation doses for conventional CT, and standard (6sDCT) and a low dose (5sDCT) Artis Zeego®-imaging. Next, 5sDCT- and 6sDCT-navigation were compared on PS accuracy and radiation exposure during AIS correction. The final part compared surgical AIS deformity correction through intraoperative 5sDCT navigation to a matched cohort treated using conventional pre-surgery CT-scans for navigation. Outcome parameters included operation time, skin dose (SD), dose area product (DAP), intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and PS deviation rates.

RESULTS

The phantom study demonstrated a reduction in radiation for the 5sDCT protocol. Moreover, 5sDCT-imaged patients (n = 15) showed a significantly lower SD (-27.41%) and DAP (-30.92%), without compromising PS accuracy compared with 6sDCT-settings (n = 15). Finally, AIS correction through intraoperative CBCT C-arm navigation (n = 27) significantly reduced screw deviation rates (6.83% versus 10.75%, P = .016) without increasing operation times, compared with conventional CT (n = 37).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative navigation using a CBCT C-arm system improved the accuracy of PS insertion and reduced surgery time. Moreover, it reduced radiation exposure compared with conventional CT, which was further curtailed by adapting the low-dose 5sDCT protocol. In short, our study highlights the benefits of intraoperative CBCT navigation for PS placement in AIS surgery.

Feasibility of a Prototype Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Motion Correction in Interventional Cone-Beam CT Scans

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Assess the feasibility of a prototype image reconstruction algorithm in correcting motion artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of interventional instruments in the lung.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, phantom experiments were performed to assess the algorithm, using the Xsight lung phantom with custom inserts containing straight or curved catheters. During scanning, the inserts moved in a continuous sinusoidal or breath-hold mimicking pattern, with varying amplitudes and frequencies. Subsequently, the algorithm was applied to CBCT data from navigation bronchoscopy procedures. The algorithm's performance was assessed quantitatively via edge-sharpness measurements and qualitatively by three specialists.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, the algorithm improved sharpness in 13 out of 14 continuous sinusoidal motion and five out of seven breath-hold mimicking scans, with more significant effects at larger motion amplitudes. Analysis of 27 clinical scans showed that the motion corrected reconstructions had significantly sharper edges than standard reconstructions (2.81 (2.24-6.46) vs. 2.80 (2.16-4.75), p = 0.003). These results were consistent with the qualitative assessment, which showed higher scores in the sharpness of bronchoscope-tissue interface and catheter-tissue interface in the motion-corrected reconstructions. However, the tumor demarcation ratings were inconsistent between raters, and the overall image quality of the new reconstructions was rated lower.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that applying the new prototype algorithm for motion correction in CBCT images is feasible. The algorithm improved the sharpness of medical instruments in CBCT scans obtained during diagnostic navigation bronchoscopy procedures, which was demonstrated both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Intraoperative 3D imaging with cone-beam computed tomography leads to revision of pedicle screws in dorsal instrumentation: a retrospective analysis

Background

Correct positioning of pedicle screws can be challenging. Intraoperative imaging may be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of intraoperative 3D imaging with a cone-beam CT. The hypotheses were that intraoperative 3D imaging (1) will lead to an intraoperative revision of pedicle screws and (2) may diminish the rate of perforated screws on postoperative imaging.

Methods

Totally, 351 patients (age 60.9 ± 20.3 a (15–96); m/f 203/148) underwent dorsal instrumentation with intraoperative 3D imaging with 2215 pedicle screws at a trauma center level one. This study first evaluates intraoperative imaging. After this, 501 screws in 73 patients (age 62.5 ± 19.7 a; m/f 47/26) of this collective were included in the study group (SG) and their postoperative computed tomography was evaluated with regard to screw position. Then, 500 screws in 82 patients (age 64.8 ± 14.4 a; m/f 51/31) as control group (CG), who received the screws with conventional 2D fluoroscopy but without 3D imaging, were evaluated with regard to screw position.

Results

During the placement of the 2215 pedicle screws, 158 (7.0%) intraoperative revisions occurred as a result of 3D imaging. Postoperative computed tomography of the SG showed 445 (88.8%) screws without relevant perforation (type A + B), of which 410 (81.8%) could be classified as type A and 35 (7.0%) could be classified as type B. Fifty-six (11.2%) screws in SG showed relevant perforation (type C–E). In contrast, 384 (76.8%) screws in the CG were without relevant perforation (type A + B), of which 282 (56.4%) could be classified as type A and 102 (20.4%) as type B. One hundred and sixteen (23.2%) screws in the CG showed relevant perforation (type C–E).

Conclusion

This study shows that correct placement of pedicle screws in spine surgery with conventional 2D fluoroscopy is challenging. Misplacement of screws cannot always be prevented. Intraoperative 3D imaging with a CBCT can be helpful to detect and revise misplaced pedicle screws intraoperatively. The use of intraoperative 3D imaging will probably minimize the number of revision procedures due to perforating pedicle screws.

The comparative accuracy and safety of fluoroscopic and navigation-based techniques in cervical pedicle screw fixation: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the comparative accuracy and safety of navigation-based approaches for cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement over fluoroscopic techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature published between January 2006 and December 2019 relating to CPS instrumentation and the comparative accuracy and safety of fluoroscopic and intraoperative computer-based navigation techniques was conducted. Several databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE, were systematically searched to identify potentially eligible studies. Data relating to CPS insertion accuracy and associated complications, in particular neurovascular complications, were extrapolated from the included studies and summarized for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were identified from the search methodology. Eleven studies evaluated CPS placement under traditional fluoroscopic guidance and 6 studies addressed outcomes following navigation-assisted placement (3D C-arm or CT-guided placement). Overall, a total of 4278 screws were placed in 1065 patients. Misplacement rates of CPS were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in navigation-assisted techniques (12.51% [range 2.5%-20.5%]) compared to fluoroscopy-guided techniques (18.8% [range 0%-43.5%]). Fluoroscopy-guided CPS insertion was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications relating to neurovascular injuries (p < 0.038), with a mean incidence of 1.9% compared with 0.3% in navigation-assisted techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review supports a logical conclusion that navigation-based techniques confer a statistically significantly more accurate screw placement and resultant lower complication rates.

Robotic Assistance for Minimally Invasive Cervical Pedicle Instrumentation: Report on Feasibility and Safety

BACKGROUND

Accurate screw placement remains challenging, especially in the cervical spine. We present our first experience of minimally invasive posterior cervical and upper thoracic pedicle screw fixation in the lower cervical spine.

METHODS

This study reports a case series of patients, undergoing posterior percutaneous pedicle fixation using Cirq robotic assistance coupled to the Airo intraoperative computed tomography scan and Brainlab navigation system. Routine computed tomography was performed on postoperative day 2 to evaluate pedicle screw placement. The effective dose was calculated.

RESULTS

Between February 2020 and December 2020, 7 patients (4 men and 3 women) were treated. The mean age was 58.8 years (range, 29-75 years). Fixation was performed with a cannulated PASS OCT Reconstruction System (Medicrea). Overall, 28 screws were placed within cervical and upper thoracic pedicles. According to the Neo and Heary classification, 85.7% were rated as acceptable and 14.3% as poor. The radiation dose received by the patient was 9.1 mSv (range, 7.7-10.6 mSv). The radiation dose received by the surgical staff was 0 mSv. The postoperative course was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior miniopen fixation using Cirq robotic assistance coupled with an intraoperative computed tomography navigation system is a major innovation that can improve the accuracy of pedicle screw positioning, with acceptable patient radiation and reduced surgical team exposure.

Posterior screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: a technique and literature review

Posterior cervical spine fixation is a key component in achieving spinal arthrodesis for treating various cervical spine pathologies including neoplastic, inflammatory, traumatic and degenerative diseases. Historically, various wiring techniques had played major roles in posterior cervical spine fixation. Today, posterior cervical screw fixation is utilized by most spine surgeons instead of wiring for its superior biomechanical strength. A review of lateral mass, pedicle, intralaminar and transfacet screw fixation techniques in the subaxial cervical spine is presented in a detailed fashion. A comparison among different posterior cervical subaxial fixation techniques is also included. Although the safety of freehand techniques was demonstrated in the majority of the existing studies, real-time navigation is becoming increasingly utilized for cervical screw insertion, especially for cervical pedicle screws, where the freehand technique is technically demanding and may carry a higher risk of neurovascular injury. Several different posterior screw fixation techniques exist for the subaxial cervical spine with generally low complication rate. Spine surgeons should be familiar with these techniques and choose the optimal technique based on each patient's individual anatomy and surgical needs.

Morphometric analysis of occipital condyles using alternative imaging technique

PURPOSE

The occipital condyles (OCs) are crucial anatomical structures in the cranial base. To our knowledge, there is no cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based study on the morphometric analysis of OCs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphometric analysis of OCs using CBCT.

METHODS

CBCT images of 200 OCs from 100 patients of which 39 males and 61 females in the age group of 18-67 years were included in the study population. Linear and angular measurements of OCs were performed.

RESULTS

The average OC width, length, height, sagittal angle, and effective height were 10.3 ± 1.3 mm, 19.6 ± 2.0 mm, 9.1 ± 1.4 mm, 7.4 ± 1.7 mm, and 35.3 ± 5.2 mm. Condylar width and sagittal angle measurements were found significantly different between the right and left sides; and were not found significant difference between the right and left sides in the measurements of condylar height, length, and effective height. Also the average intercondylar anterior distance (ICAD), intercondylar posterior distance (ICPD), distance between the basion and the anterior apex of the occipital condyle (B-AAOC), distance between the basion and posterior apex of the occipital condyle (B-PAOC), distance between the opisthion and anterior apex of occipital condyle (O-AAOC), and distance between the opisthion and posterior apex of occipital condyle (O-PAOC) were 20.9 ± 1.5 mm, 44.0 ± 2.0 mm, 12.3 ± 1.9 mm, 34.5 ± 4.2 mm, 29.8 ± 1.7 mm, and 27.0 ± 2.1 mm. There was not significant difference in the morphometric measurements among age groups. All morphometric measurements showed a significant difference depending on gender.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphometric evaluation of OCs may be effectively examined using CBCT. Linear and angular measurements data of OCs in the present study may be used as a reference database for future morphometric and surgical investigations.